Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 02-06-1984 • ~ Regular Meeting - February 6, 1984 A regular meeting of the City of Dublin~Planning Commission was held on Monday, February 6, 1984, in the Meeting Room, Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Cm. Vonheeder. * * * * ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Alexander, Vonheeder, Petty, Mack, Thomas P. DeLuca, Associate Planner, and Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director. ABSENT: Commissioner Tenery * * * * PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cm. Vonheeder led the Commission, Staff, and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. * * * * MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the regular meeting of January 3, 1984, were approved as written. * * * * ORAL COMMUNICATION Candice Larson, a Silvergate Drive resident, addressed the Commission regarding zoning codes prohibiting commercial and abandoned vehicles being parked in residential neighborhoods. She commented on the need to refurbish Village Parkway and stated a need for higher standards with regard to street maintenance within the City. Mr. Tong responded that codes are in existence restricting parking over two hours, depending on the area, and weight of vehicle, however, enforcement is on a complaint basis, at this time. Cm. Vonheeder added comments regarding the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, and noted progress toward beautification of the City. Beth Grant-DeRoos, a Deervale Ave. resident, questioned plans for undergrounding utilities throughout the City. Mr. Tong stated that all new developments are being required to underground utilities, however, existing utility wires will remain because of the high cost of undergrounding. • • * * * * WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Cm. Vonheeder commented on the recent decision regarding the BART extension to the Dublin/Livermore area. She urged citizens to go to the Chamber of Commerce office to pick up a copy of a letter demanding an Amador Valley BART extension. Cm. Petty questioned the Shannon Center lease. Cm. Vonheeder responded that the lease is still in the negotiation stages. * * * * PUBLIC HEARING PA 84-001 VALLEY DATSUN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. DeLuca presented the Staff Report regarding the Conditional Use Permit application to estabTish a new and used car dealership at 6015 Scarlett Court. He noted that Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve the request for the Canditional Use Permit. John Ferreri, 7950 Dublin Blvd., agent for the applicant, was present in the audience and concurred with the Staff Report and conditions of approval. Dave Burton, 11396 Di11on Way, encouraged approval of the application, but felt that due to the large sum of money to be invested in this project, the duration of approval for the Conditional Use Permit should be in excess of five years, suggesting 15-20 years. Mr. Tong responded that City Ordinance dictates time limits for Conditional Use Permit approvals, and typically sets a 3-5 year review period. Mr. Ferreri agreed with Mr. Burton, noting that a longer duration would be preferred, and suggested as long as the use remains, or simply stated, revocable for cause. After the close of the public hea~ing, Cm. Alexander expressed concern regarding a five year time limit, seeing no reason to "get excited" over a review of the application. Cm. Vonheeder agreed that a longer time limit may be desirable, considering the large investment by the dealer, but she questioned the ultimate compliance of this project with the General Plan designation for the Scarlett Court area. Mr. Tong stated that, according to the preliminary designation: Open Outdoor Use, this project would eomply. ~ • Cm. Petty questioned whether this project was the beginning of a trend toward an "Auto Center" in the area, and Mr. Tong responded that it was not. Cm. Alexander made the motion, with Cm. Mack's second, to approve the Valley Datsun Conditional Use Permit, with a correction to Condition #7 to reflect 330 feet above the M.S.L. and to extend the expiration date to five years (February 6, 1989). The motion was passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present. RESOLUTION 84-07 APPROVING PA 84-001 VALLEY DATSUN REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A NEW AND USED CAR DEALERSHIP AT 6015 SCARLETT COURT * * * * PA 82-033(R) BARRATT SAN JOSE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE AND TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL Mr. Tong presented the historical background of the project, which would permit the construction of an 88-unit residential project. Richard Frisbee, Environmentai Center Architect, was present to address the Commission, reminding them of the long-term of the overall project and citing mitigation of neighborhood concerns. At this time, he introducecl an alternate sketch-plan of the project, which shifted the higher density units to the center of the project. It was noted that this shift was in response to neighbors' concerns. Nate Meeks, representing Barratt San Jose, noted that the new sketch was in response to Condition #5 of the Resolution, which required that the condominium buildings be redesigned such that they reflected the one-story and two-story design of the townhouses, in order to reduce visibility into the neighboring property owners' yards. Mr. Meeks also noted resistance to Condition #20 concerning handicapped ramps. He suggested that the developer install, at his expense, handicapped-related revisions, in response to purchaser requests only. Additionally, he requested that Condition #22, concerning solar hot water systems, be struck as not being cost-effective for the small units. After clarifying verbage of Conditions #24 and #31, he requested that the density of trees required, in Condition #27, be reduced, and finally, asked for clarification of the term "at-grade patios. Dennis Ransdel, Calle Verde resident, commented that in his estimation, Dublin has a bad image, and he objected to the construction of condominiums. It was his feeling that it would downgrade Dublin's image. He encouraged denial of the project and a revision of the building code. • ~ Cathy Waterson, 11769 Serra Ct., asked for more details comparing the new sketch plan to the original plan. She further noted that the land has historically presented an "eye-sore", and agreed that it appeared to her that a multifamily residential project was the highest and best use for the property. She urged a positive move toward development. Jim Hjerpe, 7774 Woodren Ct., noted the response of the developers to citizens' concerns during the development of plans for the project, and encouraged approval of the project. Beth Grant-DeRoos questioned the sizes of the "mini- condominiums", and commented on the resale statistics of similar projects in the nearby communities. Mr. Joe Head, Project Manager, proposed to increase the average square footage of the condominiums to 650-700 sq.ft., in order to eliminate the "mini-condo" concept. When questioned whether or not the increase in unit size would have an effect on the number of units in the project, Mr. Head cammitted to the increase in condominium size even if it meant reducing the number of units. Steve Mansky, 11583 Manzanita Ln. resident, discouraged approval of the projeet, citing infringement on the investment of surrounding homeowners. Dick Hopkins, 7501 Calle Verde, opposed the projeet, objecting that it would erode the tax base of the City and expressing shoek over the overflow of Martin Canyon Creek. Peter Baldo, 75~8 Silvertree Lane, expressed approval of the project, as a representative of the Silvertree Homeowners' Association. He expressed concern over the fact that there was such a large number of "late-comers" voicing displeasure regarding the project. Barry Fell, Dublin Green Drive resident, questioned the economic feasibility of construction of single family homes on the property. Mr. Head responded that it would not conform to the density requirement, nor would it be a feasible option. Candy Larson, 11696 Corto Ct., spoke in favor of townhomes, however, she expressed concern regarding over-crowding of local schools. George Patterson, Calle Verde Rd. resident, Kathleen Copeland, 11623 Manzanita Ln., and Martin Locus, 11781 Betlen Dr., objected to the "mini-condo's". Tim Bellus, 7788 Woodren Ct., asked if the project could consist entirely of townhomes. He also called for a stop to all the objections and comments which have been heard time-and-time- again. Mr. Head responded negatively to Mr. Bel3us' question regarding the townhomes. • • Diane Mansky was in favor of development of a park on the site. Stan Harup, 7526 Calle Verde Rd., objected to the project, with the feeling that it was simply an experiment and urging the Commission to obtain more consumer data from other similar projects. He proposed a development of 68 900+ sq.ft. condominiums. After closing the public hearing, and with little further discussion, Cm. Alexander made the motion to adopt the resolution concerning the Negative Declaration. Cm. Mack offered a second, and the motion was passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present. RESOLUTION NO. 84-08 ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION CONCERNING PA 82-033.1(R) and PA 82-033.2{R) BARRATT SAN JOSE Cm. Mack motioned to recommend that the City Council accept the draft sketch plan, on the condition that details would be defined and analyzed by Staff. The motion was seconded by Cm. Alexander and passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present. Cm. Mack then made the motion to adopt the resolution recommending approval of the Planned Development Rezoning, with the following changes; Condition l. Revise to read: "Compliance with the plans contained in the new Conceptual Site Plan showing townhouses and condominium units (with condominiums a minimum of 650-750 sq.ft. in floor area, even if the increased size reduces the number of units}, and as amended by these Conditions. The details of the Site Plan to be defined and analyzed by Staff grior to a City Council public hearing." 20. Revise to read: "Handicapped ramps be provided at the request of the buyer and at the expense of the developer. . . 22. Add: . . where practical." 24. Revise to read: "All utilities fronting 27. Change number of trees to 3 to 5 trees per 1,000 sq.ft. of landsacping. 31. Shall now read: "The at-grade patios shall be fenced." The motion received a second from Cm. Alexander, and it passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present. ~ • RESOLUTION 84-09 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED'DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING PA 82-033.1(R) BARRATT SAN JOSE In view of the fact that a sketch plan had been submitted, which would affect the Tentative Map, consideration of the approval of Tentative Map Tract 5131 was continued to a later meeting. ~ * * * After a short break, the meeting reconvened at 10:30 p.m. with all Commissioners and Staff present except Cm. Tenery. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Cm. Mack questioned the status of the General Plan, and Mr. Tong responded that a Draft had been received and would be ready for distribution later this week, or early next week. Cm. Vonheeder questioned the status of the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Tong indicated that it was still being worked on. Several items caere brought to Staff's attention which would require zoning investigation. * ~ * * ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~ _ ~ ~ ~ anning C ission airm n Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director