Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 08-01-1988 _ , ` • • , ~ . + - Regular Meeting - August 1, 1988 A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held on August 1, 1988, in the Meeting Room, Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Cm. Barnes, Chairman. ~ ~ ~ ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Barnes, Tempel, and Zika, Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director, Gail Adams, Planning Secretary ABSENT: Commissioners Burnham and Mack ~ ~ ~ ~ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Cm. Barnes led the Commission, Staff, and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. ~ ~ ~ ~ ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA None ~ ~c ~ ~ MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes for the meeting of July 18, 1988, were approved. ~ ~ ~ ~ ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None ~ ~ ~ ~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Tong advised that the Commission had received 6 action letters. ~ ~ ~ ~ Regular Meeting PCM-6-1 August 1, 1988 . • • , , . PUBLIC HEARINGS SUBJECT: PA 87-045 Hansen Ranch General Plan Amendment Study, Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Subdivision Map No. 5766 and Annexation request for 248 dwelling units on 147 acres, west of Silvergate Drive and north of Hansen Drive ~continued from July 18, 1988 meeting) Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Mr. Tong indicated that this item had been continued from the July 18th Planning Commission meeting and at that time the Planning Commission decided to provide recommendations on the General Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Report issues. Mr. Tong indicated that the Planning Commission had requested that Staff ineet with the Applicant to discuss the density and traffic issues as presented in the EIR. He indicated that Staff had met with the Applicant on July 20th and 25th and these meetings had resulted in the recommendation of having a workshop format set up for further discussions. Mr. Tong indicated that Staff was recommending that the Planning Commission start by addressing at least two issues; where to develop and how much to develop. Mr. Tong indicated that the workshop format would enable issues to be clarified and would give the Planning Commission an opportunity for informal discussions plus hear additional public comments. He indicated that the Planning Commission would need to reconvene to a regular public hearing format and make decisions and recommendations on this project at that time. Mr. Tong indicated that potential dates available for the non-decision making format would be August 16, 17, 23, and 24, 1988. He indicated that the Planning Commission may also want to have a field trip to the site. Mr. Tong indicated that once all issues were clarified then the Planning Commission would need to request Staff to prepare appropriate resolutions to incorporate the decisions made. The Planning Commission recommended that they recess to a workshop format. They indicated that future workshops would be help on August 23 and 24, 1988. They indicated that they would like to have a field trip on August 20th starting at 9:00 a.m. Mr. Tong indicated that it would be appropriate at this time to discuss the key issues in regards to where the develop was to occur and how much potential develop would occur. Regular Meeting PCM-6-2 August l, 1988 ~ ~ • • Mr. Tong discussed the net versus gross density range and the potential traffic level of service at Dublin Boulevard and San Ramon Road. He indicated that the density range figures presented by the Staff at the previous meeting were the correct figures. Cm. Zika asked Mr. Tong to clarify the figures in regards to density range shown in the July 18th meeting. Mr. Tong indicated that when Staff was talking about gross density that meant exclusion of non-buildable areas. Mr. Tong indicated that Staff had reviewed the level of service issues with Chris Kinzel of TJKM and has found that the LOS for the Dublin Boulevard and San Ramon Road intersection shown in the EIR as LOS F is correct. Cm. Zika asked if the mitigation measures shown in the EIR were incorporated, and the potential project was developed, what would the LOS be. Mr. Kinzel indicated that the LOS would be "D" during peak hours. Cm. Zika asked if building the road at the Valley Christian Center would help the traffic situation on Silvergate. Mr. Kinzel indicated that TJKM had considered the effects of the project and based on all factors involved, these figures were correct. He indicated that they had a better handle on intersection traffic versus residential so these figures were subjective. Mr. Tong reiterated the land use designation as discussed in the July 18, 1988 Staff Report, Attachment 6. He showed the land use designations which were outlined on the wall map. He indicated that there were three differences shown on Attachment 3 of the Staff Report and indicated these areas on the wall map. Mr. Tong marked the cut and fill areas proposed for the development on the wall map as well as the areas that were in question. He outlined the proposed project site on the aerial map as well. David Gates discussed the three areas designated on the wall map that were in question in the Staff Report. He discussed the buildable road areas and why these areas could be built as designed for their development. Mr. Gates indicated that the area of development would be treated as gently as possible. He showed the projected roads to be developed. He discussed traffic accessibility, the best locations for cuts, discreet neighborhoods, protection of swales and grading issues. Mr. Jacoby indicated that Hansen Drive's view would not be destroyed. Cm. Zika indicated that he was concerned with the heavy grading because of possible slippage problems due to rainfall. Regular Meeting PCM-6-3 August 1, 1988 . • • Sid Cerate, Wilsey & Ham, indicated that if the engineering was done correctly there would not be any slippage problems. Cm. Zika asked if the developer could guarantee that there would not be any landslide problems occuring in the next 20 years. Mr. Jacoby indicated that the development would have the best techniques and all plans would be reviewed and approved by the City. He indicated that professional engineers as well as himself would still be around at that time. Mr. Tong indicated that Mark Trembley of EIP prepared the Environmental Assessment. Mark Trembley indicated that there were critical constraints shown in the DEIR on page 4-7 as well as in the City's Staff Report shown on Attachment 6. Mr. Gates discussed Area 2 in regards to land capacity and landslide areas. He indicated that this area would be re-built with or without development on this area. He indicated that this area was a non-riparian area. Mr. Gates indicated that Area 3 was a fragile zone and showed before and after pictures to the Planning Commission of the area to be developed. The Planning Commission took a break. Cm. Barnes indicated that she would like the public to fill out the speaker slips that were provided for their use. Mr. Jacoby discussed Area 3 in regards to the needed roads for emergency access. He indicated that there would be an all-weather road for emergency access only which would have electronic security gates. Cm. Tempel asked what would happen if there was an accident at the "Y" intersection. Mr. Jacoby indicated that there were many ways for emergency vehicles to access that area. Mr. Gates discussed the area where custom home lots would be built. Mr. Jacoby indicated that the planned development was a typical lot design which minimizes grading and was single loaded - houses on only one side of the street. Cm. Zika asked if the housing units in Area 3 were to be built below the road. Mr. Gates indicated that yes, they would be. Regular Meeting PCM-6-4 August l, 1988 • ~ Mr. Tong indicated that Staff feels part of this area is at 30~. I Cm. Zika asked if Area 3 was buildable at all. Mr. Tong indicated that more than one access road is required and that the I engineering for the site was feasible. Cm. Zika asked if there were no other choice. I Mr. Tong indicated that the length of the cul-de-sacs would be limited. ! Mr. Gates indicated he thought that the development was pretty consistent with City policies. Mr. Jacoby indicated that he was willing to have the map reduced to llxl7 for the upcoming field trip. Gloria Kasdon, 11418 Winding Trails Lane, indicated that she was concerned about flood control in the area. Marjorie LaBar, Preserve Area Ridgelands Committee, 11707 Juarez Lane, indicated that there was a response missing from the Fish & Game Department and that she could provide Staff with a copy. She indicated that EIP did not adequately respond to the archeology issues. She indicated that the area proposed for development was a natural place for archaeology finds and that this was a major concern of hers. Cm. Zika asked if anything had been found on the Hansen property. Ms. LaBar indicated that the Hansen property had not been fully surveyed. Cm. Zika asked who would pay for the archaeology survey. Ms. LaBar indicated that it would be up to the City or Developer and that it would cost the City more money later down the road. Cm. Zika asked about the Fish & Game response. Ms. LaBar indicated that the response was in the general area of Area 1 and 2 and their concerns were in line with the City Staff's concerns. Ms. LaBar indicated that she was concerned with endangered species. Ms. LaBar commended Staff's procedures on this project and distributed a hard copy of her comments to the Planning Commission and Staff. Ms. Labar commented on the revegetation process and haw it would take a considerable amount of time for re-growth. Daniel & Jane Erwin, 11408 Winding Trails Lane, were opposed to the development. Regular Meeting PCM-6-5 August 1, 1988 . • • Russell Smerz, 7530 Rolling Hills Circle, Silvergate Highlands Homeowner's Association, was opposed to the development and was concerned about the impact of noise and pollution levels. Carol Rutherfall, 11416 Winding Trail, was opposed to the Hansen Hill development. She made comment that John & Karen Terrozia, 11414 Winding Trail, also had concerns regarding this development. L. Stafford Johnson, 7546 Rolling Hills Circle, was concerned about endangered animals and plants as well as traffic safety around children in the area. He asked if a survey had been conducted in the spring in regard to the endangered species. Mr. Graham was opposed to the development and had concerns about noise and pollution levels, roads being torn up by heavy machinery and where the road entrance was being built. He asked if the City was prepared to pay for new roads in the area. He indicated that when he bought his home he was not told that there would be a road coming through his backyard. He asked what legal recourse was available. Mr. Smerz indioated that the Christian Valley Road access was not feasible for Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road commuters. Mr. Johnson asked if the City building codes required the pilings to go down to undisturbed area. Mr. Tong indicated that there were standard engineering and building code requirements that would apply. Mr. Johnson was concerned about possible landslides. There were questions raised from the audience concerning tra£fic impacts on ' San Ramon Road. Mr. Tong indicated that the City was working on widening a portion of San Ramon Road this year and plans were in the making for widening the remaining portion of the road. A member of the audience indicated that there was a concern on the blind spot over the hill and that this may necessitate a stop sign or stop light. Mr. Smerz asked about the procedures for requesting a stop sign. Mr. Tong indicated this would have to go to the City Council and a submittal request would have to be directed to the Public Works Director. Mr. and Mrs. Mark Allen, 7507 Rolling Hills Circle, were opposed to the item. Ms, Nancy Briest, 7503 Rolling Hills Circle, was opposed to the item. Mr. Don Briest, 7503 Rolling Hills Circle, was opposed to this item in regards to current development profile outlook. He indicated that the City had gone far enough up the hills with homes. Regular Meeting PCM-6-6 August l, 1988 , ~ ~ ~ a ~ • - Ms. Evelyn Freeman, 11400 Winding Trail Lane, was opposed to the item in regards to the possible litter problems. Ms. Joyce Graham, Board of Directors, Silvergate Townhouse Homeowners Association, 11426 Winding Trail Lane, was opposed to the item as presented by Applicant. She commended Staff for doing a good job and was concerned about the road being built because of the close proximity to existing townhouses. Cm. Barnes requested a larger facility for all future study sessions. Cm. Barnes kept the public hearing open and continued this item to August 23 and 24, 1988. ~ ~ ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS Cm. Zika asked about the status of his request for the City to obtain information regarding 90-gallon garbage cans. Mr. Tong advised that the idea to use 90-gallon garbage cans may not be economical for a city the size of Dublin. He indicated that San Ramon and Pleasanton use a different garbage company service than Dublin. Cm. Zika and Barnes asked if it was possible for the Planning Commission to ask the City Council to investigate the feasibility of 90-gallon garbage cans servicing the Dublin area. Mr. Tong advised that yes, the Planning Commission could make a request, however, it ma be more a ro riate to make the re uest as individ a Y PP P q u ls or residence of Dublin, instead of as the Planning Commission. ~ ~ ~ ~ OTHER BUSINESS Cm. Tempel asked about the traffic signal status on Lewis Avenue. Mr. Tong said that he would check. Cm. Barnes asked about the status of the mailboxes being moved. Mr. Tong indicated that there was no response from the postmaster as of yet. Cm. Barnes indicated that there may be a need for requests from the general public. ~ ~ ~e ~ Regular Meeting PCM-6-7 August 1, 1988 - . ~ , , ; . PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS None ~ ~ ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m.. ~ ~ ~ ~ Respectfully submi ted ~ ; ~ C ~ ~ P anning Commiss on Ch irperson ~ Laurence L. Tong Planning Director ~ ~ ~ ~ Regular Meeting PCM-6-8 August 1, 1988