HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 01-06-1992
• ~ ~
Reqular Meetinq - January 6, 1992
A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held
on January 6, 1992, in the Dublin Civic Center Council Chambers. The
meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Commissioner Burnham.
* * * *
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Burnham, North, Barnes, Rafanelli and Zika;
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director; Libby Silver, City Attorney;
David K. Choy, Associate Planner; Brenda Gillarde, Planning
Consultant; and Gail Adams, Recording 5ecretary.
* * * *
FLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Cm. Burnham led the Commission, Staff, and those present in the pledge
of allegiance to the flag.
* * * *
ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA
Mr. Tong indicated to the Commission that item 9.1 was a Staff related
item and requested that it be heard after item 8.2.
The Commission concurred.
* * * *
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of December 2 and 16, 1991 were approved.
* * * *
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Ken Johnson, Tamarack Drive, indicated that he had witnessed a
near bicycle accident on Amador Valley Boulevard and Village Parkway
and was concerned that bike riders were not obeying the rules of the
road. He also indicated that people are dropping their children off
at the Dublin High School where the red curb area is located. He
indicated that these individuals should not be parking in a red curb
zone. If the zone is incorrect, then someone should change the color
to indicate the correct parking regulations.
The Commission thanked Mr. Johnson for his input.
6.1 Election of Officers
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-1 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
. i •
~ Mr. Tong indicated that on December 2, 1991 the Commission continued
~ the election of officers and recommended that the Commission elect a
Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson.
Cm. Barnes nominated Commissioner George Zika to be the Chairperson.
Commissioner North seconded the motion. By a vote of 4-0,
Commissioner Zika was appointed Chairperson.
Cm. Barnes nominated Commissioner Ralph Rafanelli to be the Vice-
Chairperson. Commissioner North seconded the motion. By a vote of
4-0, Commissioner Rafanelli was appointed Vice-Chairperson.
The meeting was turned over to Commissioner Zika.
* * * *
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARINGS
SUBJECT: PA 91-099 Hansen Ranch/Bren Company Development Aqreement
(to be continued to the January 21, 1992 Planninq Commission
meeting)
Mr. Tong indicated that Staff was recommending continuance of this
item to allow Staff to complete the analysis for the Staff Report.
Since the Negative Declaration has been prepared and noticed for this
project, Staff recommended that the Commission open the public hearing
and continue the item to the January 21, 1992 meeting.
Cm. Zika opened the public hearing and asked if there was any public
comment. Being none, the item was continued to the January 21st
Planning Commission meeting.
SUBJECT: PA 91-067 Dublin Municipal Ordinance Amendment Management
Audit (to be continued to the Januarv 21, 1992 Planning
Commission meeting)
Mr. Tong indicated that the Commission had continued this item from
the December 16, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. Staff was
recommending continuance of this item to the January 21st meeting in
order to review and incorporate the City Attorney's comments into the
Draft Ordinance Amendment.
The Planning Commission continued the item to the January 21, 1992
Planning Commission meeting.
SUBJECT: Review of Draft Site Development Review Guidelines
(continued from the November 4, 1991 Planninq Commission
meetinq)
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-2 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
. •
~ Mr. David Choy presented the staff report to the Commission. He
~ indicated that this item had been continued from the November 4, 1991
Planning Commission meeting. He indicated that the guidelines were
created to provide Staff and Applicants with general design direction.
They are to be used in conjunction with the Zoning Ordinance. Staff
recommended that the Commission approve the Site Development Review
Guidelines.
The Planning Commission unanimously approved the Draft Site
Development Review Guidelines.
SUBJECT: PA 88-144 Western Dublin General Plan Amendment, Specific
Plan, Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Prezoning,
Amendment to the Sphere of Influence, and Annexation to the
City of Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District
~Continued from the December 16, 1991 Planninq Commission
meetinq. For this public hearing, discussion is limited to
Chapters 4 throuqh 7 of the Specific Plan)
Ms. Brenda Gillarde gave a brief review of the previous meeting as
well as Chapters 4 through 7 of the Specific Plan. An adjournment
time of 10:30 p.m. was discussed and approved by the Planning
Commission.
The Planning Commission indicated that the January 6th meeting would
be continued to January 14th to continue the discussion of the West
Dublin Specific Plan.
Ms. Gillarde indicated that if there was sufficient time left, there
would be discussion on the General Plan Amendment at the January 14th
meeting as well. i
The Planning Commission reviewed possible meeting dates after the
January 14th meeting. It was decided to continue the January 14th '
meeting to January 29th. '
The Planning Commission and Staff discussed the letter regarding the
Morris property. Ms. Silver, City Attorney, had reviewed the letter.
She indicated that a bike path was considered a public right-of-way
and therefore the property could be taken for that purpose. A
General Plan Amendment was the appropriate exercise to follow for
planning purposes.
Ms. Gillarde gave a brief overview of the planning process for the
project. The first meeting involved land use and traffic circulation.
She indicated that there was a concern regarding the Brittany Lane
road extension. Possible alternatives were also mentioned.
Ms. Gillarde emphasized that the West Dublin project would go through
many public hearings. There would be no decisions made at this
meeting. The City Council would need to review the Specific Plan,
General Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Report before any
final decisions were made. There would be plenty of opportunities
for the public to voice their comments and/or concerns.
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-3 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
' • ~
~ Ms. Gillarde continued the Specific Plan discussions and briefly
~ described the bike/pedestrian trails within and around the proposed
project. She asked if there was any public comments.
Diana Day had concerns that people would park on the streets in
existing neighborhoods to access the trails. She asked if there would
be sufficient amount of parking for these individuals or would people
be parking on the streets. She also was concerned with additional
litter caused by the pedestrian traffic and asked who would be
responsible for maintaining the trail areas.
Bob Doyle, EBRPD, had concerns regarding the trail system and the
public's safety. He indicated that the park district had a lot of
experience with regional systems and had a basic plan laid out for the
Alameda and Contra Costa County areas. He was also concerned with the
cost of maintaining open space areas, ridgeline road development and
aesthetics. He felt that a natural environment was less costly. A
road would cost more to maintain.
Cm. Zika asked Mr. Doyle what if there was no money to maintain the
area.
Mr. Doyle indicated that the City would cut costs by good planning of
the areas. For instance, if there were no roads or housing, it would
cost approximately $100 per acre to maintain uninterrupted open space
versus $500 per acre if there was development intruding into open I
space areas. '
Cm. Zika asked who maintains the area at the present time.
Mr. Doyle indicated that a development assessment would need to take
place.
Mr. Zev Kahn asked if there would be limited access to the trail areas
for people who lived outside of the proposed project site.
Ms. Gillarde responded that the open space area would be open to the
general public.
Mike McKissick referred to the "Morris" letter. He indicated that he
has not proposed any development on or around this property. Staff
has proposed a trail system in this area.
Ms. Gillarde continued the discussion on the sewer and water section
of the Specific Plan. She indicated that the area would be serviced
by and annexed into the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD).
The treatment plants/lines would need to be extended to the project
site. This cost was borne by the Developer. There would be
reclaimed water which was suitable for irrigating the golf course,
trees, etc. This would be very beneficial in conserving water.
Mr. Bert Michalczyk, DSRSD, described the plan for water services. He
indicated that the necessary steps would be taken to provide water to
everyone in the area. The recycled water program is very beneficial
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-4 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
n • • •
~ and would cut down on the amount of water needed. There would be a
~ sewage treatment plant set up as well.
~
Cm. North asked what the cost would be to expand the water services to I
the site and who would be paying this added expense.
Mr. Michalczyk indicated that the costs would be borne by the new
development.
Cm. Burnham asked if it was legal to pump wastewater into Alamo Creek
or the reservoirs.
Mr. Michalczyk indicated that the creek and reservoirs would be
protected from contaminated water. The water would be discharged into
a storage area and would then be used for irrigation.
Cm. North asked if the recycled water would be stored in a separate
reservoir. He hoped it would not be used for drinking water.
Cm. Zika indicated that the State had cut Zone 7's water allotment and
asked what type of percentage of a cut that was.
Mr. Michalczyk indicated that there had been a 90~ cutback in the
water allotment. However, there was 2/3 of the water now available.
Cm. Zika asked if there was enough water available now that could be
delivered to the Western Dublin project. Will there be a need for
rationing?
Mr. Michalczyk indicated that with good planning and management of the
water there would not be any water shortages.
Cm. North requested clarification on well drilling. He indicated that
Zone 7 indicated in the reports that by 2007 there would be a need for
well drilling or they would be running into water shortages.
Mr. Michalczyk indicated that some shortages could occur after 2007.
This indicator should motivate us to plan now for the future.
Cm. Zika asked if water could be bought from another source.
Mr. Michalczyk said this possibility was being looked into.
Mr. Zev Kahn felt that developing the land would cause water shortages
to occur quicker. He indicated that DSRSD showed a poor record of
water control. He referred to the pump station located in the western
hills. This location is not well screened and asked that DSRSD take
more time in planning the future pump station locations so that they
could not be seen.
Doug Abbott, PARC, indicated that the State could not deliver enough
water to accommodate this project. He felt that DSRSD was drawing too
much ground water and buying water from other sources should not be
considered. He was also concerned about the existing Williamson Acts
existing on most of the property in the Western Dublin area. He
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-5 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
. i •
~ indicated that cancelling these agreements was not a routine matter.
There needed to be specific findings and most of these agreements
would be in effect until 1998.
Mr. Shagrill had concerns regarding the water resources. He indicated
that the availability of water would only get worse and we should not
rely on future resources. He indicated that the water district did
not have the money to set up a water recycling system. '
Bob Zapotosky had concerns regarding the water supply. The State was
now in its sixth drought year and Zone 7 needed to update their
reports that were done back in 1989. He was concerned that recycled
water would be in contact with people and there should be other
alternate water supplies. There has not been enough discussions to
properly address these concerns.
Lanna Herrmann had concerns regarding water supply. She used a
private well and she knows what its like to run out of water. She
asked if the property owners in the Eden Canyon Road area would be
impacted by the Western Dublin development.
Mr. Michalyzck responded to the public's concerns. He indicated that
DSRSD would cooperate with the Planning Commission and City Council on
the location of the pump stations. The cost for infrastructure would
be borne by the project applicant. Zone 7 would be responsible for
drilling wells and there would only be a slight concern regarding
water shortages in the peak demand time periods.
Cm. North asked for clarification on the recycling water system.
Mr. Michalyzck indicated that the recycled water was not drinkable or
swimmable. This water would not come in contact with the regular
water supply to people. It would be on an entirely different system.
There would be no contamination of the drinking water.
Cm. North hoped that the City and the water district would work
together in the location of the pump station.
Cm. Barnes asked if the golf course would be on recycled water.
Mr. Michalyzck indicated yes. The recycled water was processed under
certain standard regulations.
Cm. Burnham was concerned that people would swim in the reservoir and
asked what measures would be taken to keep people out.
Mr. Michalyzck indicated that whoever was responsible for maintaining
the reservoir would need to take precautionary measures. The area
could be fenced off from the development.
Mr. Mike McKissick responded to the recycled water concerns. He
indicated that there has never been a problem in the past with
reclaimed water. He strongly believed in using this system. It
would cut down on the amount of water needed for the area.
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-6 January 6, 1992
[1-6minJ
• ' . ~
~ The Planning Commission took a five minute break. On returning,
everyone was present.
Ms. Gillarde continued the meeting with discussions regarding the
Community Facilities for the Western Dublin project. She indicated
that there would be a"village" center which was the focal point of
the project. There would be retail uses, offices and shopping
centers. An elementary school, fire station, postal office, and
library would also be constructed. Currently, the Castro Valley
Unified School District was responsible for the area, however, the '
Dublin School District might take over the responsibility. Dougherty
Regional Fire District would be responsible for the fire station and
the City of Dublin would be responsible for policing the area.
Diana Day had concerns with the police protection and felt that there
should be additional police patroling the area.
Robert Patterson had concerns with the cost of constructing an
additional school and felt development fee/assessment should be
considered to provide the needed funds.
Tom Treto, Castro Valley School District representative, indicated
that present fee calculations only provide 25-30~ of the cost to run
schools.
Mr. Zev Kahn had concerns with having two separate school districts
for the area. He felt that there should only be one whole district.
Cm. Zika felt that joint ventures were not advantageous.
Ms. Gillarde continued onto discussions regarding Recr~ation and Open
Space. She indicated that approximately 60~ of the open space would
be preserved and pointed to the recreation and open space areas on the
wall map.
Diana Day reiterated her concerns with parking availability. She
asked where were the additional cars to park when accessing the
recreational sites.
Ms. Gillarde indicated on the site plan where people would be allowed
to park. There would be access points to the recreational areas
throughout the project; however a staging area was located near the
future Schaeffer Ranch interchange.
Diana Day also had concerns with the additional garbage and debris
that would be caused by the additional traffic accessing the open
space areas.
Mr. John Anderson had concerns regarding the two access roads into the
project. He asked who would be responsible for maintaining the open
space. Was there anyone committed to taking care of this area?
Ms. Andrea McKenzie, EBRPD, wanted to see the open space preserved.
The area was a scenic backdrop for the City and there was the various
wildlife habitat to consider. There should be buffer zones between
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-7 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
• •
~ , the open space and the proposed development and the City might want to
consider fencing off areas for grazing purposes. She had concerns
regarding the amount of grading being done and the public's safety.
She felt that homes built on one side of the street would be
beneficial. She was looking forward to working with the City.
Mr. Mike McKissick responded to the pubiic's concerns. He indicated
that the intent was to dedicate the open space to someone. There
would be no more development on the remaining open space. He pointed
to various locations on the wall map where there would be homes built
on only one side of the street.
Mr. Zev Kahn asked where the regional and city parks would be located.
Ms. Gillarde pointed to the proposed locations of the parks on the
wall map.
Mr. Kahn asked if the residents of the Donlan Canyon development would
be able to use the open space in the Western Dublin area. There
should be a commitment from someone to maintain the open sgace.
Mr. Tong explained that the Hansen Hill and Donlan Canyon projects had
undeveloped open space. Staff was currently talking with the Bren
Company regarding access to a linear park. The Donlan Canyon project
was still under review.
Robert Patterson pointed out that there could be a homeowners'
association. He was concerned with the cost of liability.
Mr. Bill Banse had concerns with open space maintenance. He indicated
that there was no guarantee that this undeveloped land would stay in
open space.
The following individuals did not wish to speak of their concerns;
however, turned in speaker slips.
Mr. Gary Laughridge had concerns regarding the extension of Brittany
Lane.
Ms. Debra Feo had concerns regarding the land east of the northeast
border of the proposed development and Marwick Drive. She asked what
this area was zoned.
Ms. Lisa Magnoli had concerns regarding the current drought situation.
The area is already having difficulty supplying water to the existing
residents. She felt that another development would deplete the
existing resources.
Ms. Magnoli was also concerned with the open space areas. She felt
that the management of the open space should be determined before the
plan was adopted. She felt that the undeveloped land should be
preserved as there were very few natural areas left. Wildlife would
be adversely affected.
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-8 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
~ ~ ~ ~
~ , Tom Horrillo had concerns regarding the depletion of ground water
supplies. The State supply has already been cut back and there will
be additional costs incurred with the new development. He asked if
the new development would be bearing all of the costs.
Ms. Gloria Kasdan had concerns regarding the wildlife habitat. Over
the past four years, she has witnessed the disappearance of numerous
animals because of encroaching development. Additional development
and the drought would not benefit or enhance the wildlife habitat.
Ms. Gillarde concluded the discussions for the evening. She
indicated that additional concerns can be addressed by letter to the
Commission or Staff. There will be additional opportunity for
comments at the January 14th meeting. She indicated that the General
Plan Amendment document was available at the City offices.
Cm. Burnham asked if the City Attorney could address the concern
regarding the Williamson Act.
Ms. Libby Silver indicated that the property owners under the
Williamson Act were restricted in the use of their property and their
property taxes were reduced. She indicated that contracts can be
changed; however, she would provide a memo to the Commission regarding
the Williamson Act regulations.
The Commission continued the public hearing to the January 14, 1992
meeting.
* * * *
NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Tong indicated that the City Council would be considering the
Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding massage establishments at the
January 13th meeting. They would be considering adoption of the
Negative Declaration for the 2-lane parallel road as well.
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS
Cm. North asked for clarification regarding financing of
infrastructure.
Ms. Silver indicated that she would provide a memo to the Commission
explaining assessment districts, sales taxes, road improvements, etc.
The Commission requested information regarding the Williamson Act
cancellations.
Ms. Silver responded that she would provide a memo to the Commission
on this matter as well.
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-9 January 6, 1992
[1-6min]
y
? ~
~ ~ ^ ~
~ Cm. Barnes questioned the red curb located at Dublin High School.
Mr. Tong indicated that he would notify the traffic committee through ~
the Public Works Department about the concern.
Cm. Barnes asked how specific detailed questions from the citizens get ~
answered. i
Mr. Tong indicated that Staff provided general answers at the public
hearings. The individuals could talk with the Staff after the
meeting.
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~
W~,c.,<..~~P- ~e ~ :r-
annin ommiss' n hairperson
~
~
'
La rence L. Tong
II Planning Director
Regular Meeting PCM-1992-10 January 6, 1992
[1-6minJ