Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-01-2011 Adopted CC Min~~4F DU.~~~ MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~,`` OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ~ ~~~ 8~ REGULAR MEETING - MARCH 1, 2011 ,~~/// ~ ~~ CLOSED SESSION A closed session was held at 6:31:26 PM, regarding: CONFERENCE W1TH LEGAL COUNSEL---ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9: 2 cases. ~i A regular meeting of the Dubfin City Council was held on Tuesday, March 1, 2011, in the City Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 6:59:41 PM, by Mayor Sbranti. . ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Biddle, Hart, Hildenbrand, Swalwell, and Mayor Sbranti ABSENT: ~'i PLEDGE OF ALLEG{ANCE The pledge of allegiance to the flag was recited by the City Council, Staff and those present. ~'i ~ REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTION Mayor Sbranti stated that, during tonight's closed session, the City Council authorized the initiation of a litigation action and authorized the intervention in a separate litigation action. Once either of the actions is formally commenced, the City will identify the action, the defendants, and the other particulars to any person upon inquiry. ~~ DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 30 `~,~OFDp~ REGULAR MEETING n; ~ a~ MARCH 1, 2011 '~~~~~~ f 4GIFpR~~ 1 ORAL COIIAMUNICATIONS Introduction of New Employees: Sqt. Rafael Alvarez, and Deputv Vikki Sarasua, Dublin Police Services 7:00:33 PM 3.1 (700-10) Dublin Police Chief Tom McCarthy introduced Sgt. Rafael Alvarez and Deputy Vikki Sarasua (not present) to the City Council. The City Council welcomed Sgt. Alvarez and Deputy Vikki Sarasua to Dublin Police Services. ~ Certificates of Recognition for City of Dublin Young Citizen of the Year, Citizen of the Year and Orqanization of the Year 7:04:24 PM 3.2 (610-50) The City Council presented Certificates of Recognition to Aslan Brown for being named the City of Dublin Young Citizen of the Year, Chris Bennett for the Citizen of the Year, and Kaleidoscope Activity Center for the Organization of the Year. Acceptance of Charitable Donation from Anthonv, Anpie and Lauren Bilich 7:10 p.m. 3.3 (150-70) Chief Tom McCarthy presented the Staff Report and stated that Dublin Police Services Crime Prevention Unit was given a$500 donation by Anthony, Angie and Lauren Bilich that would be used for costs associated with producing an age-appropriate music video to reach Dublin school children with an anti-drug message. The Dublin City Council would present the Bilich family with a Certificate of Appreciation. On motion of Vm. Hart, seconded by Cm. Swalwell and by unanimous vote, the City Council accepted the $500 donation, approved the Budget Change and formally recognized the donor. Public Comments 7:12:20 PM 3.4 No comments were made by any member of the public at this time. v~ DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 VOLUME 30 G~~,~OFDpB~ REGULAR MEETING m ~ir a~ MARCH 1, 2011 '~~~~~fl '~GI R~~ CONSENT CALENDAR 7:12:26 PM Items 4.1 through 4.5 On motion of Cm. Hildenbrand, seconded by Vm. Hart and by unanimous vote, the City Council took the following actions: Approved (4.1) Minutes of February 15, 2011; Adopted (4.2 600-60) and RESOLUTION NO. 20 -11 APPROVING TRACT 7982 FINAL MAP RESOLUTION NO. 21 -11 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR LONG TERM ENCROACHMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE FEATURES WITH TRACT 7982 Adopted (4.3 600-35) RESOLUTION NO. 22 - 'i 1 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 11-01, SPEED FEEDBACK DEMONSTRATION PROJECT TO WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL, LLC Adopted (4.4 600-60) ORDINANCE NO. 2 -11 APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 9717 KNOWN AS THE PROMENADE WITHIN AREA G OF DUBLIN RANCH BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND JAMES TONG AND MEI FONG TONG, PA 08-006 Approved (4.5 300-40) Check Issuance Reports and Electronic Funds Transfers. ~~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None ~i DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 VOLUME 30 ~~oFDO~ REGULAR MEETING ni MARCH 1, 2011 '~\~~~~~ ~4LI R~S PUBLIC HEARINGS - None ,~_ UNFINISHED BUSINESS Automatic External De~brillator Proqram Options 7:12:55 PM 7.1 (540-70) Alameda County Fire Department Deputy Fire Chief Demetrious Shaffer presented the Staff Report and advised that the Dublin City Council established a Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Goal to "study the feasibility of the City establishing a process that would require business participation in the Alameda County Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) program". At the City Council meeting on November, 16 2010, Staff presented the initial findings with a recommendation to implement an.Automatic External Defibrillator (AED) educational outreach program with a one-year study period for new and existing businesses. The City Council directed staff to examine the possibility of implementing a more robust program that could require new and existing businesses to deploy AEDs. Staff had researched potential AED/PAD programs for the Dublin community and conducted a preliminary analysis of the fiscal and implementation impacts. In the development of options, Staff reached out to the Dublin Chamber of Commerce and the Alameda County Emergency Medical Services (County EMS) for input. Staff was seeking further direction from the City Council on this item. Cm. Biddle asked if it would be up to the City to provide the development and Staff training associated with any program implemented by the City. Chief Shaffer stated that was correct. Vm. Hart asked why there was no information regarding retail establishments in the Staff Report. Chief Shaffer stated that the retail establishments at Hacienda Crossings were in Attachment 3 in the Staff Report. Option 1 would include all businesses, as detailed in the Staff Report. Cm. Swalwell stated that the Staff Report indicated a small percentage of calls for service required AEDs. What was that percentage? Chief Shaffer stated he did not have that exact percentage but he could get the information later for the City Council. Cm. Swalwell asked, within that small percentage, how many times was an AED nearby that was not used, or there was lack of training. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 30 REGULAR MEETING MARCH 1, 2011 G`~~ OF DpB~ 19~~_ S=7N7,82 ~ ~~. f ~'1GII~OB~~` 4 Chief Shaffer stated he did not have the exact statistic, but there were studies that showed when an AED was available, it was used less than 5% of the time. Theoretically, reasons for non-use could be a person was not trained to use it, reluctant to use it, did not want to get involved or was unable to act. Cm. Swalwell stated, at the Fire Advisory Committee meeting, Chief Shaffer had discussed an iphone application that showed where AEDs were located. He asked for information as to where it was available and would it being coming to Dublin. Chief Shaffer stated the application had been developed by and deployed at San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (District}. The appfication showed all the AED locations the District had been able to log, in real time. It was designed to allow a person to receive push notification of the immediate need for CPR. If a person was trained in CPR and in the area, they could assist. Alameda County Fire was watching the application and would return with information if its use was being considered. Cm. Hildenbrand stated she had received inquiries from residents regarding this application. Mayor Sbranti stated he received a letter from Nancy Feely, CEO of the Dublin Chamber of Commerce, discussing a recent meeting she had with Alameda County Fire Department representatives. She stated there needed to be an educational outreach program for Dublin businesses regarding the benefits and costs of the AED program. She stated the Chamber would be happy to work with the City on this. Suzette Clark Walker, Chamber of Commerce representative, stated the Chamber would be discussing this item at their meeting next week. Cm. Hildenbrand stated this was an excellent idea, but considering the costs, the City should go with Option 3, an educational outreach program to businesses (new and existing) identified in Option 2, with a potential incentive program implemented after one year. There needed to be an educational outreach program. It was important to have an AED at Hacienda Crossings. She did not know if the City could justify hiring a Staff person to administer a program at this time. She did support this. Cm. Swalwell stated the City was ahead of the curve and he would choose to start with Option 3. If the City went with any other option, the City would have to consider geographic locations of businesses. He was interested in the iphone application discussed earlier. Cm. Biddle stated he would support starting with Option 3 and working toward Option 2, a mandated program requiring only those businesses (new and existing) that qualify as a location with a higher need for the use of an AED. Vm. Hart stated his passion was defibrillators. They saved lives. He was very supportive of working with the Chamber of Commerce, but at a more expeditious pace towards Option 2. Option 2 should be the City's goal. He was not sure administrative support would require one DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5 VOLUME 30 ~oFOOB REGULAR MEETING n;~ ~ ~~ MARCH 1, 2011 '~~~~~~~ ~`1LIFOR~~ full time employee. He believed that estimate was on the high end. He knew it was doable. There would be some administrative work that would need to be done. There would need to be work done regarding location. Not ever single business needed to get AEDs. There needed to be at least one AED at Hacienda. He did not want to hurt small businesses. He would like to give direction to move forward maybe with Options 2 and 3. The City could start with Option 3 and work toward Option 2. He did not believe the cost of each unit was $3,000-4,000. If it was mandated, it would save lives. He was not afraid to push the businesses a little bit. It was an opportunity to move forward with something that was very progressive. He would like to give direction to Staff to move forward in a more assertive manner, with Option 2 being the goal the City could move toward. Cm. Swalwell asked Vm. Hart what he would think about going with Option 3 for now and then having the City come back in a year with options in regard to geographic locations of AEDs. Vm. Hart stated he was not convinced an education program would take a year to implement. There was probably written materials already on the subject. Time was of the essence. He reiterated his passion regarding this subject matter. Implementation needed to be more robust than educational outreach. Cm. Swalwell stated this item was important, but the City should start with outreach. Mayor Sbranti stated the City needed to look at what the Fire District was doing. It was exciting. The City could use Option 3 to move toward Option 2. The City could set up a working group with the Chamber, Fire and Staff to prioritize direction. The group could take a look at geographic areas. Businesses could participate in purchasing a unit and share costs. He would like to get a report back by December from the working group. Cm. Hildenbrand stated it was like what was done with smoking, have the stakeholders involved in the discussions and get a report back in nine months and there might be more buy-in. Cm. Biddle stated to mandate a unit in businesses might just make the AED a piece of hardware, with no training or educational outreach. Mayor Sbranti stated the outreach needed to be there. There was a lot of work that could be done. Cm. Swalwell stated there could be anecdotes of actual local AED uses in the outreach. Mayor Sbranti stated with a report in nine months, he would like to see what was happening with the iphone application and see where Alameda County Fire was with this. Vm. Hart stated he could live with a report in six months. He would like to participate in the group. Mayor Sbranti asked the City Manager if a report back in six months was doable. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6 VOLUME 30 G~,~oFOVB~ REGULAR MEETING n~ ~ ,a MARCH 1, 2011 , '~~~~~~~ ~`1G/FOR~1~ City Manager Pattillo stated it would take three months just to get the participants lined up and then they could come back in three months to report what progress had been made. Usually, when the City implemented educational programs, they let them settle for a year. This had been done with the City's environmental programs. Would the City Council agree to three months for program development, and three months to see what results, if any, were accomplished. The group would be composed of the Fire Department, a member of the City Manager's Office, and the Chamber of Commerce. Mayor Sbranti stated he could agree to three months for formation and then another three months to see how education was working. City Manager Pattillo stated the City would also have to work with the Alameda County Health Department. Mayor Sbranti asked if someone donated an AED unit, was it a charitable donation. City Attorney Bakker stated it could be a business tax right off. Mayor Sbranti stated it was more expensive to buy a unit individually than buy in bulk and maybe businesses could share in the costs. Perhaps this could be an item on the agenda for the next faith-based round table meeting. City Manager Pattillo reiterated that City Council direction was to convene a group of Alameda County EMS, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, and City Staff and Fire, in developing a goal statement, as identified, and review associated outreach strategies; and return in three months to report. Then the group would implement strategies for three months and return with a status report. The report would come back to the City Council in August or September. The City Council concurred with the City Manager's stated plan. ~~ Sustainable Neiphborhood Desiqn. Stratepv 8:04:08 PM 7.2 (530-10) Principal Planner Kristi Bascom presented the Staff Report and advised that the City of Dublin had taken an active role in promoting environmental sustainability with initiatives such as the Green Building Ordinance and the City's recent adoption of a Climate Action Plan. In this report, Staff was presenting the City Council with various . options for implementing a "Sustainable Neighborhood Design Strategy," which would enable and promote sustainable site design and planning for the street, land use, and open space patterns for neighborhoods in Dublin. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 7 ~ VOLUME 30 ~,~OFDpB REGULAR MEETING in~ ,r~~ MARCH 1, 2011 19 ~~v`~ ~~ ~ ~~ Gc~FOR~s Vm. Hart asked if part of the policy would include width of streets. Ms. Bascom stated she had been working with Public Works and the policy would cover width of the ultimate right of way, which would incorporate sidewalks, parkway strips, bicycle lane, as well as travel lanes, medians and the light. Vm. Hart asked if there were certain areas of the City that had wider streets, or setbacks of residences, than others. He asked if the proposed policy would recommend guidelines relative to that aspect. Ms. Bascom stated it would focus more on the amenities on the street, such as ensuring correct bicycle lane widths and ample sidewalks for pedestrians as well as detached sidewalks, in particular, with a parkway sidewalk between the sidewalk and the street. There were many classifications of roadways. Cm. Swalwell asked if this was state-of-the-art. Ms. Bascom stated this was nothing cities were doing on a regular basis. Other cities were taking a variety of approaches. Looking at this on a broader level, it was unusual to be able to propose something on a planning level. There was no one in the area that the City could use as an example. City Manager Pattillo stated this compiled a lot of what the City was already doing. It was a collection of the City's current practices. Mayor Sbranti stated this was including parts of current City documents such as the City's Streetscape Master Plan and the Bikeways Master Plan. Ms. Bascom stated this was what the City was doing. The City could say from this point forward, this is what the City wanted to see in its neighborhoods. Cm. Hildenbrand stated the Summerglen community in Dublin was a wonderfully planned, walkable community. Residents were utilizing what was around them. The City should be striving for more green infrastructure; she would like to see more must-haves in green building infrastructures. Cm. Biddle stated this kept the City ahead of what was being presented in the County. The City Council discussed and, by consensus, approved the following five Staff recommendations of the Sustainable Neighborhood Design Strategy: Item 1 Content of the Draft SNDS Item 2 Applicabilit~of the SNDS based on proiect tvpe DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8 VOLUME 30 G~,~oFOO~~ REGULAR IVIEETING n, r~ir a~ MARCH 1, 2011 '~~~~~~~ '~GIFOR~ Item 3 Applicabilitv of the SNDS to actual proiects Item 4 Implementation and Incentives and Item 5 Adoptinq Draft SNDS By consensus, the City Council confirmed Staff's recommendations on the elements of the Draft Sustainable Neighborhood Design Strategy, the applicability of the Sustainable Neighborhood Design Strategy; the methods of implementing, and methods for adopting the Sustainable Neighborhood Design Strategy. ~i NEW BUSINESS Proposed Second Amendment to the First Time Homebuver Loan Proqram 8:34:24 PM 8.1 (430-60) Community Development Director Jeri Ram presented the Staff Report and advised that Staff was requesting the City Council authorize the Second Amendment to the First Time Homebuyer Loan Program to address changes in the residential mortgage industry that had occurred in the past several years. Additionally, the Amendment included minor clean ups that were necessary to streamline processes. Staff was also requesting direction from the City Council if a change should be explored that would offer borrowers the ability to repay their loans monthly with fixed principal and interest payments. Vm. Hart asked for an explanation of a third party vendor. Ms. Ram stated some nearby cities used a loan servicing company to manage its portfolio for the loans for the payments. The person who paid the loan did so through a servicing company that then worked with the city. Vm. Hart asked how many loans had been approved. Ms. Ram stated thirty loans had been approved and the program had been in existence for five or six years. The total value of the loans was $982,000 and the average loan amount was about $35,000. Cm. Swalwell asked if it was correct that there had only been one default on these loans. Ms. Ram stated that was correct. Suzette Clark Wa{ker, Bay East Realtors, stated the mortgage industry had changed and it made sense to make these changes. She asked the City Council to approve the changes. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 9 VOLUME 30 G~,~~oFDVB~ REGULAR MEETING u, MARCH 1, 2011 '`~~~~~ GwFOeN`° Vm. Hart asked why the City was involved in managing the First Time Homebuyer Loan Program. There was a budgetary cost associated with managing the program. Ms. Ram stated each city had a housing element that required certain housing programs. One program the City developed was the inclusionary program. The development community had the ability to build 12.5% inclusionary units or to put into a fund a portion of that, or 5%. That 5% went into a housing in-lieu fee fund that the City used for many of the programs that the City had. This was one of them. It also helped pay for Housing Staff to support those programs. City Manager Pattillo asked if Vm. Hart's questions was about the City's management of the program versus having a third party manage the program. The decision was made years ago when this program was established to have City Staff manage it. Vm. Hart asked if a non-profit organization could do the same thing. Ms. Ram stated she had not explored that option. City Manager Pattillo stated if that was an option the City Council would like Staff to explore, they could do that. Vm. Hart stated it was something to examine. It had budgetary ramifications to the City as a whole. There were other ways to provide the service at a significantly reduced cost. He stated he was trying to make clear that his concerns were not the program itself, but the delivery or management of the program needed to be evaluated. Cm. Hildenbrand stated she did not totally agree with Vm. Hart. She did not believe it had caused considerable hardship on the City to manage the program. It had come out of the Affordable Housing Task Force and had evolved. There were non-profits right now that were mismanaging monies funded by cities. She was concerned about that option. Vm. Hart asked about the cost of managing the program. City Manager Pattillo stated she did not have the exact costs at hand. If the City Council wanted Staff to evaluate it, they could take a look at how they currently delivered the program and current expenditures and is there an opportunity to do it differently? Staff could evaluate service delivery. Vm. Hart asked if, as a rough estimate, was it more or less than $400,000. City Manager Pattillo stated the $400,000 included the dollars allocated for the loans. Vm. Hart asked, if the City had only done 30 loans in a six year period, could there potentially be some cost savings that would benefit the City if a reallocation was done. The City Council was always striving toward more cost efficient ways of doing business. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10 VOLUME 30 G`~,~OFDpB~ REGULAR MEETING rn/~a MARCH 1, 2011 19v~'/~'~' ~~ ~ ~ ~`1GIFOR~~ Mayor Sbranti clarified that the money the City spent on the managing the program were not General Fund dollars. They were inclusionary housing dollars. Did most other cities manage their loan programs? Ms. Ram stated most of the surrounding cities managed their First Time Homebuyer Loan programs. Something to consider was that the Housing Staff manages a whole portfolio of different programs, e.g., Community Development Block Grant monies. This was only part of what they do. So far this year, the City had processed two loans. She did not know if a non- profit would be interested in managing something so small. Mayor Sbranti asked what the process was for someone to apply for a First Time Homebuyer loan. Ms. Ram stated the information was on the City website. The City actively marketed it with Bay East. The real estate agents that sold properties in Dublin were aware of the program. The financial institutions that worked in the area were also aware of the program. Citizens could come in and fill out an application. Mayor Sbranti stated Staff could take a look at what other jurisdictions were doing. He was also leery of taking this outside of the City and going to non-profits. In regard to history behind the First Time Homebuyer Program, he had asked that it be placed on the City's Goals & Objectives. It was approved after he was off of the City Council. The reason he suggested a program was because housing costs were escalating. First time homebuyers were having difficulties entering the market. First time homebuyers were still having difficulties entering the market today. This program had value. He agreed there was always opportunity to look to see how programs were managed. Vm. Hart said the City could have the program, but the City did not have to manage the program. There were other options to look at. Were there not other funding needs for inclusionary dollars? City Manager Pattillo stated there were a variety of things Staff wanted to present to the City Council for future consideration of inclusionary dollars. That would be part of the budget discussion. At one time, the First Time Homebuyer Loan program was set at $500,000. It was now set at $400,000. Staff would return with the cost of managing the program, look at other options, and how other cities managed their programs. Could someone else manage it? Would the City Council like Staff to research fixed monthly payment option? What did the City Council want Staff to return with? Mayor Sbranti stated Staff should look at all of the above. Staff should research fixed monthly payments and what were the different ways of handling it. Staff should also look at how other jurisdictions handled their loan programs. ~ DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 11 VOLUME 30 ~.~~Oe oUe~, REGULAR MEETING rn ~ MARCH 1, 2011 '`~~~~~ C'~~~R~S City Manager Pattillo stated the there were other Housing elements completed by the Housing Staff. Vm. Hart stated they needed to put everything on the table, including a program that the City could provide at a reduced cost and still have control over. On motion of Cm. Swalwell, seconded by Cm. Biddle and by unanimous vote, the City Council provided Staff direction on exploring the ability for a borrower to repay a loan with fixed monthly payments, research options on managing the loan program, and adopted RESOLUTION NO. 23 -11 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER LOAN PROGRAM ~ Letter of Support for Lawrence Berkelev National Lab Second Campus 9:03:20 PM 8.2 (470-10) Economic Development Director Linda Maurer presented the Staff Report and advised that the City received notification that Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory issued a Request for Qualifications for a second campus. The City notified property owners in Dublin and received notice that one site would be submitted from Dublin. Staff was recommending that the City Council direct the Mayor to provide a letter of support to Argent Development Group as part of their submittal to the Request for Qualifications. On motion of Vm. Hart, seconded by Cm. Hildenbrand and by unanimous vote, the City Council directed the Mayor to provide a letter of support to locate the second Lawrence Berkeley National Lab campus in Dublin. -G~i OTHER BUSINESS Brief /NFORMAT/ON ONLY reports from Council and/or Staff, including Committee Reports and Reports by Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB 1234) 9:10:37 PM City Manager Pattillo stated on the City's website citizens were encouraged to sign up for the Dublin Police Academy. There would be a public meeting on March 3~d regarding Altamont Corridor Rail Project. There would also be a webinar on March 10 regarding the same project. The information was on the City's website. The Green and White Gala would take place on DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12 VOLUME 30 G`~OFDpB~ REGULAR MEETING m ~, ~a MARCH 1, 2011 '~~~~~~~ ~, R~'s March 11, 2011, the St. Patrick's Parade and community event would be on Saturday, March 12, 2011, and Sunday March 13, 2011 at the Civic Center and the 5k Fun Run and Walk on Sunday. Cm. Swalwell stated he ' attended the Volunteer Recognition event. He attended the Fire Commission meeting, the Strategic Planning Workshop and the Chamber of Commerce Expo. Cm. Hildenbrand stated she attended the BART ribbon cutting ceremony. She had received a comment from a citizen regarding security at the station. Vm. Hart asked that the City Manager and Chief of Police work with BART regarding perceived security issues at the station. Cm. Hildenbrand stated she attended the Volunteer Recognition event, the Livermore Amador Valley Transportation Authority Finance Committee meeting and an Executive meeting of East Bay Division of League of California Cities. Cm. Biddle stated he attended the Tri-Valley City Council meeting, the Developer's Roundtable, the Tri-Valley Affordable Housing meeting, the Chamber of Commerce Expo, the Strategic Planning Workshop, and the BART ribbon cutting ceremony. Vm. Hart stated he attended the Fire Advisory Commission meeting, the Volunteer Recognition event, and an Associated Community Action Program meeting. Vm. Hart asked if the City Council would consider rescheduling the March 7, 2011 budget meeting. By consensus, the City Council agreed to reschedule the March 7, 2011 Budget meeting to Monday, March 14, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. Mayor Sbranti stated he attended the Tri-Valley City Council meeting, the Volunteer Recognition event, the BART ribbon cutting ceremony, the Chamber of Commerce Business Expo, the Strategic Planning Workshop, an Integrity in Action meeting, and a TV30 meeting. ~i ~ ADJOURNMENT 10.1 There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 9:41:11 PM in memory of Staff Sgt. Sean Diamond and our fallen troops. Minutes prepared by Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk. ATTEST: ,~` ~ City Clerk ~ ~ i ~~~~:~, Mayor ' DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 13 VOLUME 30 ,~oFOOB REGULAR MEETING n;~ ~ ~a~ MARCH 1, 2011 '~`~~~~ ~crFOt~~~