Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.8 Shannon Architect SvcsCITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 11, 1988 SUBJECT Shannon Community Center Renovation Architectural Services EXHIBITS ATTACHED A. Summary of Proposals B. Excerpts from Proposal for Architectural Services - Associated Professions, Inc. RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve the revised scope of work to include design services for both the Phase I and Phase II Improvements for FY87-88 2) Retain the firm of Associated Professions, Inc. to provide architectural services for Shannon Center Renovation 3) Direct staff to prepare the documents necessary to execute the contract agreement at a cost not to exceed $38,000 FINANCIAL STATEMENT Proposed Fee - $32,000-$38,000 $195,800 is available in FY87-88 for Shannon Center Improvements DESCRIPTION At the January 25, 1988 meeting of the Dublin City Council the Council approved the Request for Proposals for Phase I of Shannon Center Renovation and authorized staff to advertise for consultants. Initially seven architectural firms submitted proposals for the suggested Phase I improvements. However after reviewing the proposals, the scope of work associated with the Phase I improvements and the timeline for implementation of the work, staff agreed that it could be more cost effective and time saving to do the design and construction documents for both Phase I and Phase II improvements in FY1987-88 and embark on the actual construction in FY1988-89. Thus staff invited the top three firms to submit addendums to their original proposals to include the additional work associated with the Phase II improvements as well. A summary of the three proposals is attached in Exhibit A. After a thorough review determined that Associate suited to complete the wo Shannon Community Center. diversified design and architecture and planning surveying and electrical Their proposed fee for $14,500 to $18,000. If their fee increases to renovation as provided Program is as follows: of the proposals received, staff has d Professions, Inc. of Livermore is best rk associated with the renovation of the Associated Professions, Inc. is a engineering corporation and includes civil and structural engineering, and engineering as its major elements. the Phase I improvements ranges from the Phase II improvements are included $32,000-$38,000. The budget for the for in the 1986-91 Capital Improvement PHASE I PHASE II FY87-88 FY88-89 TOTAL Design $17,175 $20,920 $38,095 Inspection $ 6,870 $ 8,365 $15,235 Construction $1 71 , 755 $209,1 85 $380, 940 TOTAL $195,800 $238,470 $434,270 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 6c ol COPIES TO: Associated Professions Inc. „Q, ITEM NO. ♦ null j' Agenda Statement - Shannon Community Center Renovation April 1 1, 1 988 Page Two Their proposed fees falls within the budget for design and inspection services. A copy of their proposal is attached in Exhibit B. Therefore, it is the recommendation of staff that the Council take the following action: 1) Approve the revised scope of work to include design services for both the Phase I and Phase II Improvements for FY87-88. 2) Retain the firm of Associated Professions, Inc. to provide architectural services for Shannon Center Renovation. 3) Direct staff to prepare the documents necessary to execute the contract agreement at a cost not to exceed $38,000. EXHIBIT A Shannon Community Center Renovation Summary of Revised Proposals Associated Professions, Inc. Chester powles, Jr./Daniel Hi.llmer, Associ.ated Architect Hanson, Murakami, Eshima -1200 liast :lvenua 1898 Hyde Street 429 Second Street Livermore, CA 9~550 San Francisco, CA 99109 Oakland, CA 94607 Proposed Pro~ect Team Proposed Proiect Team President - Randall H. Schlientz Principal-In-Charqe - Chester Bowles Principal in Charge - Norman Eiong Project Manager - Daniel Hillmer Project Ar chitect.- Wynn Neti~ton Structural Engineer - Forell/Elsseser Structural Engine2r - Frank Linhart Mechanical & Electrical Eng. - Hansen & Slaughter Electrical Engineer - Glenn Polzin Ncoustical Consultant - Clzarles Salter Assoc. Fee Ranqe Fee Ranqe Phase I $19,542 Phase I & II $95,558 Phase I - $14,500 Phase I & II - ~32,000 Hourly Rates Principal Project Architect/Engineer Senior Architect/Engineer F.rchitect/Engineer Drafters Clerical $1II,000 $38,000 $95.00 $75.00 $60.00 $53.00 $15.00 - $49.00 $26.00 Timeline (Phases I & III Preliminary Design 7 weeks Construction Documents 7 weeks Review 4 weeks Biddinq 4 weeks Ccntract Review 2 weeks Ccnstruction 16 we~ks Hourlv Rates Principal $70.00 Project Manager $50.00 Architect ~30.00 Timeline (Phases I & II) Preliminary Design Construction Documents Review/Bidding ContraCt Review Construction 6 weeks 8 weeks 6 weeks 2 weeks 2Ei weeks Total 12-1/2 months Proposed Prolect Team Project Leader - John Clelson Project P.rchitect - Lorna Dare Structural Engineer - David L. Messinger &^r.ssoc. Mechanical Engineer - Yamamoto Engineering Electrical Engineer - ~9ilkinson Engineerir.g Fee Ranqe Phase I $21,000 - Sz~, 000 Phase I& II 545,000 - 350, 000 Hourly Rates Principal 380-5100 Senior Architect 560-580 Project Architect 560-570 Senior Draftsperson/Designer S45-S60 Draftsperson/Designer $30-540 Timeline (Phases I & ZI) Preliminary Design 8 ~aeeks Construction Documents 6 weeks Review 4 weeks Bidding 4 weeks Contract Negotiations 2 weeks Construction 12 weeks Total 9 months 'Ibtal 10 months ~ :~..: ~ . ~E~ov~~riorv o~: . . ~ : ~ i ; . .:: :::;: ~::~ ::::::: ~~ : ::~::: : ~:~::~: ::~~~ ~.. :::::~ :~ :~ ~:~::::::::::::: :::::::::::::: ~ ~ r. . ~ _ . ~ ~'! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ :, , ;- t , .° - - -~ •- . Y.I--~+'+' ' _ ' .,rry~_-~;:'.~...."~ .~' ' 2` i . . ~ ' ~ - ~ •+ rt~ ~!'t F l y, k, 7-~ :9 £C ~ . . ~ ~ 1 ;q ~ ~.. 5 t .:T ,~~". ~~ ' # ~ ~~ r ~ ser ~ ~'i 'f f l ~ ~...t:•, k , ~~. ~.s y r . 1 F . . _ ~ . ,.~ t -. ,. ~ .~ , t _.,,..~ .. ,x ..... ,e. C` _ a _ . ; r, .,~ .:~. I._ .. ~.' ~ ; :~ .~ ~•~ t . ~ •' • ~ ' ~~~ ' , i..yt J ./ . • ~ ! R . ~ 1' 'i ~ . "r , . I _i v e i .- `~}~ . . . a 1` ~ . I~ ~'~~,~1`+{{ l,, •jt, rt"L~~'~ i ;J,tt.-..~ ~ ~ .~ ~ . ~JJ~,~•1~~! ~` f ~~~' , ~~j~~J~11 '''t'~ ~ ~, . ~,, i I 1 ~ ~ T ~ ,t I ~ ~ .~..~ r i.-r..~.r~:;. ' - - ~ . . ~ - ~ ~11~~. ~~`•,` . - ... =~:::=~° ; .., . . -., , ~~:~~ ~ . , :- ~ , R ~ , "~_-r _ 'x . - -.F _ , Z-i `~ ,~ ~i . '~~ i , ~ ~i I ( ~ . . 1 ~~r .•-" : . . , '~ , , .. _ ~. , ~ . , ~ ~ .'...r `~. • t _ . . . . .~ ' ' • ! )r y ~ ~ .~~ ! j~ i _ ~ .F' ' - . , , . ~ 5~ ~ t h .F't ~ . Y . 1 b ~~ G r~ . ~'' ~ . ~ A ~` ~iS y~ L '~+ ~ ~ - ~--.. ~ -_ \ a V 5 . . 4 ~ ~. ~'.t'.x _a* ~-r . ~..:: ~° .: ~,- tj~ ~x .. .. ~ a.~ J G~4 ' 3 ~ :. . . . ~ : . . 1 "j,,:.. _ .. . . '=Y; ~ +°i _ _ , ' . ~ S . ,. . ' . ." . . ~ ' i - . . ~ - . . , . . ~ ','~ SC.... . ' . • ~~' . _y ~~ ~PSa. ~ ~ ' ' f :- i, '~. #' : ( " - . ` " . . . ~ ~Y ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ' . , . '~` ~ ~ # ~ ' ~ ' ~ ir : ~ .. 1 • . . . V . . . ~ .~.~kd~Y . . ~ , .Si . - ~ ' ~ ~ ~r ti:: . . . .. . _ .. ~Y3 ~' . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . i d ~ Mr k 3.~.~ ~ - 4 a `. t ~ , ; ' ~ ~ ., .. . , * ' , _ ' ' . . , . , . . y~q(~. , ..- . ~::~~~.~.~:~-: -_:., ;-~ ~ P r e p a r e d B y: r . .~ , ~ ~°-, ~ ~ ,A~sociatec~ Pr~f~ssion~ inc. ~,~;:~"~~` Planners • . Enginee~s • Architects • Surveyors ~ -~ .. -. . ~~ ~~ -~ 4200 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550 ~:x. N. ~~;; - . - ~:: ~.. .9~'_ _ ~.. cF-, '.;P.i `P~"' " ........:..... . .. . . ..... ........ : ...: .........:. :w::::::::::::._:.~:::•)}:~:<•}i}Y }:::.~:: :w::v:::::.~:5r: i::<~>i>:~ `C~:Y?ii:{i{L:ji??}i}?}fi~~ii>?ii}i}}iii}i .: za5.•-.,:+'f":~_ ................................ ....... ..j,~,~.;~s _ .. _ .... ........ ... .. ................... ...........~. ...... +~. 3 ~` 3~'~ -- :. ~ ' ' " . . . - . . WY T~ ~ d ..~. '. . . ~ . '... ' ...• . .. __ . '. . . . 4a 1 . . ' ~ "4`' ~'i ti x~ f . .~' . . . . . ~ . -yeyt;,~n,~..:.~....,......_ .., .v..... - . . .. . ~ (415) 4~17-4017 ~ ~ i We at Associated Professions perceive this to be a unique project and a unique opportunity. The Shannon Community Center is a graceful building situated in a beautiful setting. The multitude of improvements required should not impose on or destroy the charac- ter of the community center. We believe,that a dedi- cated team of professionals is needed to sensitively restore this building, and we believe that our firm embodies those unique requirements. API has a dedicated team of specialists all within our own staff, with prior experience in similar work. Our in-house team would include an Architect, Struc-. tural Engineer, Civil Engineer and Electrical Engi- neer. We have an excellent Mechanical Engineer, Entek, wha specializes in restorative work and energy conservation. Our team would involve our firm with only one outside consultant. If we were retained to do Acoustics work as well we would retain an Acoustic Engineer, Salter & Associates, with whom we have worked previously. The core Design Team would involve our office team with only one outside Mechanical consultant. This close-knit team approach is particularly important when dealing with a variety of small, but inter-re- lated, design problems. Our firm is expert in this size project. Most of our work is $250,000 to $1 million in size. our close proximity to the project site (15 minutes) means quick response time and easy accessibility. We believe that our prior experience in this projec~ type, our in-house team of pro~essionals, and our close proximity make API uniquely qualified for this project. BACKGROUND Associated Professions, Inc. has a 27 year history~ in the Tri-Valley region. Organized in 1960 by Earl Mason of Livermore and known originally as Mason and Associates, the firm has been instrumen- tal in the surveying and planning of subdivisions and communities along the 580 corridor. The Archi- tectural Division was initiated in 1961 and has . been managed by Randall Schlientz since 1965. Together with Norm Hong, with API since 1971, our Architectural Division has designed many of the . commercial, industrial and residential buildings in~ the area. CAPABILITIES Associated Professions, Inc. is a diversified design and engineering corporation, and includes Architecture and Planning, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Surveying and Electrical Engi- neering as its major disciplines, in two offices within the state. Our combined capabilities allow API to provide a complete professional design ser- vice. FINANCIAL STABILITY We have a quarter of a century of experience in business and client service. Our diversity strengthens our financial base and allows us to weather changing patterns of growth and develop- ment. With an average Gross Receipts over the last 5 years of over 2 million dollars per year.. API anticipates a stable financial future with steady growth. Our Professional Liability insurance cov- ers us and protects our clients as well. $1,000,000 in both Professional and General Liab- ility is supplemented by an active Professional Education Program by our insurance carrier. Addi- tionally our firm has just completed a Peer Review Program designed to objectively review the organi- zation and staffing, management and technical expertise of our staff, and provide positive input for improvement of the firm, an evaluation of the firms management practices. We are one of few firms who have yet undergone the Peer Review, and are pleased with the outcome. Certificates of Insurance are available upon request. _, .. ' . _ :. _: 1;'<;. , , :. : , >.: RANDALL H. SCHLIENTZ As President of Associated Professions, Inc. ARCHITECT, AIA Randy oversees the operation of management in our Architectural Division. His 23 years with API enable him to provide valuable guidance to the key players for each project, and to contribute insight on local conditions which can only be gained through years of experience in this region. EDUCATION ~Bachelor of Arts in Architecture 1957 University of California, Berkeley REGISTRATION California - 1965; Arizona - 1977 EXPERIENCE Randy has had considerable experience in the design of public and private buildings. Prior to his partnership in API, he was emplyed with the English firm of Gerald Banks, F.R.I.B.A. near Oxford, England and was responsible for the design and production of several sizeable projects. His experience while with other California firms includes primarily school design. PROFESSIONAL American Institute of Architects, East Bay Chapter ORGANIZATIONS American Institute of Architects, California Council _ _ _. .. .... , <2 . : NORMAN HONG As Principal - in - Charge for this project ARCHITECT, AIA and limited partner with API, Norm will provide valuable job management capabilities and 15 years of technical expertise as a licensed Architect. Norm manages the day-today aspects of our Archi- tectural Division and is actively involved in each project from conception to completion. EDUCATION Bachelor of Architecture 1966 University of California, Berkeley REGISTRATION State of California 1973 EXPERIENCE Norm's experience in Architecture and Civil Engi- neering includes service as a Captain with the United States Air Force as a civil engineering officer with and architectural specialty, in charge of the Construction Management for 26 Lock- heed aircraft support facilities totaling over 28 million dollars. and other large planning and pro- gramming projects. He also participated in the design of various commercial and residential buildings, while employed in the Sacramento area. PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS While with API Norm has designed a large variety of Architectural projects including various office buildings, banks, restaurants and industrual facilities. Norm was the project architect f~r an extensive study of handicapped accessibility prob- lems found within the Livermore Ualley Joint Uni- fied School District's 15 schools. His experience at API includes the design of the Young California Building Exhibition Hall at the Alameda County Fairgrounds, and the Livermore Area Park District Community Center addition. American Institute of Architects, East Bay Chapter American Institute of Architects, California Council _ ,, ; $ WYNN E. NEWTON As Project Architect for the proposed Shannon ARCHITECT, AIA Community Center Renovation, Wynn will utilize her strong technical background and experience with commercial buildings, design for the disabled and renovation. EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts in Architecture 1981 University of California, Berkeley REGISTRATION State of California 1987 EXPERIENCE Wynn has a background in industrial, commercial, residential, and educational building projects. While in the Stockton area, she participated in several extensive remodeling projects for the Uni- ~ versity of the Pacific, the San Joaquin County Jail, including the Men's Maximum Security and the Women's Honor Farm, as well as many commercial remodels and tenant improvements. Other projects include new commercial facilities, such as the Stockton Shelter for the Homeless and Crystal Val- ley Winery, Yountville,Ca. PROFESSIONAL American Institute of Architects, Sierra Valley ORGANIZATIONS Chapter American Institute of Architects, California Council ;; , ': ' ` ', _ , ; _ . : ,; : 4 FRANK J. LINHART Our Structural Engineer has been with API for 10 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER years. A limited partner with API, Frank's asso- ciation with the firm allows us to coordinate the Engineering, Analysis, and consultation required in building design and modification, and design structural solutions in a timely and cost- effective manner. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering 1976 University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA REGISTRATION 1979 - Civil Engineering 1983 - Structural Engineering EXPERIENCE . A specialist in wood-frame construction design and analysis, Frank has designed a variety of mid- sized commercial structures, and, most recently, supervised the construction of the multi-million dollar Triad Facility in Livermore. Other pro- jects for which he is responsible include the Eschen Medical Buildings, Livermore, Lakeshore Plaza Condominiums, San Mateo, and Brookmeadow Park Recreation Building in Livermore. PROFESSIONAL Structural Engineers Association of Northern ORGANIZATIONS California American Society of Civil Engineers ';S .:. GLENN POLZIN API's Electrical engineer provides our team the ELECTRICAL ENGINEER electrical expertise to design power distribution systems, lighting and HVAC controls and layout, and a comprehensive plan for current and future power needs in buildings. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering 1960 University of Wisconsin REGISTRATION State of California Professional Electrical Engineer No. E-6575 EXPERIENCE While working for the Lawrence Livermore Labora- tory, Livermore, California and Mercury, Nevada, Glenn designed electrical power distribution and lighting systems, and researched equipment con- trol, including large scale direct current recti- fier systems. Nis experience with API includes Livermore National Bank, Livermore; First Baptist Church, Dublin; Lake Mobile Home Park in Stockton and the Emperor's Garden Restaurant in Livermore. PROFESSIONAL Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ORGANIZATIONS >. a The scope of required Architectural Services as outlined in the request for proposal, requires some clarification, and we have included the following items in our Fee Proposal: 1. We feel that it would be most cost-effective for the City of Dublin to consider sharing the Construction Inspection, thereby using our firm on an hourly basis in this capacity. It is rarely neccessary to have the Architectural firm on sit.e for complete Construction Inspection service, par- ticularly for a job of this nature, and we feel the cost to you would be excessive. 2. As a part of the Contract Administration phase we would review submittals, issue payment certifi- cates, etc., but change order items would be billed on an hourly basis, as extras. 3. API, as part of our service to the City of Dublin, would make required site inspections in the preliminary design.phase, prepare and present preliminary plans, cost estimates and outline spe- cifications for City Staff and Park and Recreation Commission and City Council Review. Following review, API would prepare final plans, specifications, cost estimates and bid doc~ments, and assist in pre-bid and pre-construction meet- ings. . ; ; , ; ,, , , :, ; . . . > . : ,.; . , ;< ;.;; - ;. : ;:: > :., . .: : ; ;:. ; ; >: ,:.... In In reviewing the detailed Building Improvement Plan for the proposed Renovation to the Shannon Community Center, it has become apparent to our staff that many of the costs, as estimated by Han sen/Murakami/Eshima, Inc. may not reflect 1988 construction costs, may not be accurate, or may vary widely because of job conditions which cannot be anticipated. Some costs might be eliminated, some might be added, depending on actual improve- ment choices. For example: 1. Inspection of the existing toilet facilities reveals the need for new toilet partitions, or at least re-surfacing of the existing partitions, in addition to the need to move at least the parti- tion adjacent to the proposed new handicapped stall. Any work done that requires moving parti- tions will effectively ruin the floor in this area, which does not comply with current sanitary requirements anyway. However, new flooring should also be installed in the corridors outside the restrooms, and also in the vestibule outside the Kitchen door, because the surface is lifting and presents a hazard to occupants. Additionally, the floor in the Kitchen will need to be modified when new cabinets are installed. It seems reasonable, then, to assume that new floor coverings should be installed in all of these related areas. 2. API would review the need to replace the Kitchen lighting. It is unclear whether the lighting has been determined to provide inadequate lighting levels or if there is another reason for its proposed replacement. 3. The Building Improvement Plan calls for moving the Non-complying exit door in the Pre-School out by 8" or so, in order to provide the required 2'-0" clear space on the strike side of the door. This modification would require significant work to the exterior of the building, including pos- sible replastering, roofing of the new area, and extensive flashing. The final result would be unsightly and expensive. (continued) ' ; ,' ; ; <' :: ; :. _ _.. , , ; `: ; ; > ;: < : <:., ,:. ,. ; ,;;; ; 8 ;. <; , . : ,: .. Our inspection of the Pre-School doors revealed the existance of two original doors which have been closed off. One of these will be removed if the proposed building plan is implimented but the other could be utilized in lieu of moving the existing door out. The non-complying door could be transformed into a fixed glass light. 4. The double doors in the Pre-School room are presently in use. They do not comply with exit requirements, however, because they have flush- bolts, and do not have knobs. Proper hardware should be installed on these doors as well. 5. Other doors have flush bolts which are prohi- bited. 6. The required exit doors in the West Room are impeded by draperies, and would be unusable for exiting when these drapes are closed. Study should be done regarding this situation. 7. API feels that the cost to install the eleva- tor and related walls, structures and entry, will be higher than the estimated $60,000. ;~ A more detailed study of the existing conditions and further evaluation of the proposed solutions is required. The items noted above are only indic- ative of the conflicts we see in the program and are not intended to be all-inclusive. Our cost estimates appear on our Fee Proposal, and may be modified by changes in the program resulting from a final study and recommendation. Having reviewed the Building Improvement Plan and taken an informal walk-thru of the project, as well as a careful site review of currently recog- nized problem areas we feel comfortable that we have an understanding of the nature of the project, and are interested in participating with the City of Dublin in the proposed upgrade of this community landmark. The building is a fine piece of work, and, with careful and thoughtful plan- ning, can be made more useful to the children, seniors, handicapped persons and others who visit and use the Shannon Community Center, without com- promising the character of the building or its surroundings. _ 14: ::: SHANNON COMMUNITY CENTER RENQVATION DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA DESCRIPTION Preliminary Plans, Cost Estimates. amd Specifica- tions Final Plans, Specifications, Cost Esti- mates Bid Documents, Pre-Bid Meeting, Pre- Construction Meeting Construction Inspection. WORK COST TOTAL ARCHITECTURAL Administration and Review $2,000 Working Drawings b8,500 ~ ~ $10,500 CONTRACT Bid Phase $1,000 ADMINISTRATION Contract Administration $3,000 SUBTOTAL • ~4,000 STRUCTURAL Structural Engineering $2,000 ENGINEERING $2,000 TOTAL $16,500 (continued, next page) ~.w..~_,_ ~_ _.._ ~. ~ . .. _ - - - FEE RANGE Our proposed fee will be within the range of $14,500 to $18,000. We anticipate that changes to the program and resulting changes in the scope of our services will modify the contract price. CONDITIONS A. The Proposal is based in part on the estimates by Hansen/Marakame/Eshima, Inc. Our services include improvements for Phase 1 only, and assume to be correct the recommendations made by the , Building Improvement Plan~. If, in our estimation during the preliminary planning stage, we find that other codes require additional work, or that more or less work is necessary, our fees will be revised. B. Our estimates also take into consideration and revise the costs as estimated by Han- sen/Murakami/Eshima.. Total Phase 1 work shall include: a. Install single door hardware $2,350 b. Install double door hardware $5,000 c. Replace dbl doors at East Rm ~3,000 d. Ext. Landing level w/int. flr. $1,000 e. Temp. glass in hazard. locations $1,500 f. Safety film on glazing above exits $1,500 g. Handrails (int. and ext.) $6,500 h. Relocate doors to achieve 18" jambs $2,000 i. Corridor from N. Entry thru E.Meeting $7,500 Rm. and Storage Rm. . j. Kitchen (remove pantry, warmer, $30,000 replace cabinets. New Wolf range, oven, mocrowave, ventilatiorr and lighting). k. Elevator (including new Entry, $75,000 courtyard access and corridor thru Pre-School Room 1. Accessible drinking fountain and ~2,000 telephone. m. Make existing Restroom handicapped $15,000 accessible, increase lighting; light, non-absorb. finishes. n. New lower level restrooms $25,000 o. Exterior access to lower level $5,000 restrooms (ramp w/handrail) p. Brace wood Chandeliers $1,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ~ $183,350 Exclusive of Fees :::~ :~: ;::>. PROFESSIONALS AND OFFICE STAFF Principal, Architect, Engineer Project Architect, Engineer Senior Architect, Engineer Architect, Engineer Senior Drafter Design Architect or Engineer Drafter Technician III Drafter Technician II Drafter Technician I . Apprentice Drafter Secretarial REIMBURSABLE Travel Expense COSTS ' RATE $95.00 $75.00 $60.00 ~53.00 $44.00 $42.00 $35.00 $28.00 $23.00 $15.00 $26.00 $ ..25/mile Consultant Fees and Agency Fees and other Reimbursable Costs will be subject to an Administration Fee. Cost + 15% _ : ; ;;; ; ': ;»>. , . - . 18; ,:: :. . ,.: _ : >:: ,. ; V w 0 O z U O a w ~~~ v~ ~ ~ . Q J ~ ~ ~:ti~: ' ~ ~ ~ ~- Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ . . m W LL. Z Q ~ W ~ a _ G. y o u•~ .~ v~ a a.o 0~0 ~z A .~ ~ ~: ~n v u~ o v u~ A c0 ~>, p~ u p, •.-I P~+ •~ ~+ b.~ U cU UI ~' W~y I •ri •rl p a~ .~ 3 •,~ ~n v v ~ o~+ ,~ a~ c~ a> s~ v ~__ _. x '• ~ ~ a ~ ~ a u 0 Q G O •rl u u ~ v ~+ a G~ o ~ c~ v u• rl cU c~ ~ G•~ •rl 4.~ f=. tn W N ~+ u ~ cn m ' a. 0 v c.~ ! s~ . ~ a . ~ ~, ; ~ x v u•~ c~.~ 0~4' e G~ o~ 0,1 ~C G rl r-1 •rl w a a.+ aJ ~+ ~, v O a~ ~ v-~ •rl CJ 'b ~+ •~ •~ ~: oa 5 ro ~ a a ; v ~•~ ~+ c~ ~.; ; a. ~ i j I . u] ~ R1 ~.c ~ w i.o '•~ ca .; ~ ~~ . 0 ~ .~ v ~ ~ 3 o v ,i ,i a.+ D u v ~ P: 1+ ~.+ u Ul U .{'. ro o ~+ c~ ~ v o ~+ c~ a ~ ~i .~ ~ a~ .~ u a ~ ~+ ~ u O (A rl G J.+ O U U~ ~+ ~ u 'iao G v o m c~ REFERENCES Livermore Area Recreation and Parks District Bill Payne, General Manager 447-7300 . County of Alameda Guy Richards, Senior Architectural Project Manager 670-5450 ~ Diocese of Oakland Clem Finney, Architectural Engineering Coordinator 893-4711 City of Livermore . Lee Horner, City Manager 449-4020 Veterans Hospital of Livermore Marvin 0'Rear, Hospital Administrator 447-2560 Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District Rudy D'Ambra, Director of Facilities Planning 447-9500 :'~~:~.:. .;. ~.w,; r~ ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS 4200 EAST AVENUE LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA 94550 (415) 447-4017 INTRODUCTION The following package is a supplement to Associated Professions previous submittal " titled "Proposal For Architectural Services, Renovation To: Shannon Community Center", ~~ dated February 29, 1988. CONTENTS Revised Fee Schedule and Project Schedule f~r Addendum 1 Resume for Acoustical Engineering Consultant Resume for Mechanical Engineering Consultant SHANNON COMMUNITY CENTER RENOVATION DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA DESCRIPTION Preliminary Plans, Cost Estimates, and Specifications Final Plans, Specifications, Cost Estimates ' Bid Documents, Pre-Bid Meeting, Pre- _. Construction Meeting Construction Inspection FEE RANGE Our Proposed fee will be within the range of $32,000 to $38,000. We understand that, because of unknown building conditions, the scope of work may involve more or less than is itemized in the "Building Improvement Plan". Our fee would be negotiated accord- ingly. Additionally, should our firm make recommendations which change the items included in the project, we would adjust our fee appropriately. The rate schedule which we submitted pre- viously will apply. . ~ ~ a. ; ... Q , ~u > ~v ~ ~ Q o 3 ~ a~ ~ w r ~ ~ N ~ N Z t Q ~ 7 ~ ~ U v ~ ~ , ~ > ~ ~ , Z ~ F- = ~ O ' . .... I- ° o- o ` ~ c. N V ~ : Q :~:: 3 J ''f:'r: • .C ~: f:~ ~ ~ ~ \ W ~= Z a~ ~ - ~ -~ . c co L } C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O v a Q ' ~ r ~ ~ ~ . ~. o a ~ . d .~ a ~ O 0 q V ,G o N O ~ ~ ~ U] v~ G .~ v~ 1.r U7 ~a xv ,~ ~ ~ ~ . .v W ~ cn~ ~ ~ v aUi > i a y Q a~o ~z A G- U~ o ~ O u~i O C = .,~ ~n w cn a~ m o o ~n v v G~ o~ 3 0 ~ ~.~ u N ' a v u G A ~1 cC 9, ~ r-1 ct3 oJ cd G r-i r-1 •rI v •~-1 t~ a ~ >,~a ~ ~,~ wa ~ a~, ~ ~ o . cU N U FL+ U1 O L~ ~ d ~ ~ q+J . W C W~ I •rl •rl W Cl w~+ U 'b •~ ~n cS1 c ~ v1 U .f+ cd o O U U'.7 N ~-. O p ,~ .~ 3 •,~ u~ a, a ~+ ,~ ~a u~ ~+ •~+ ,~ ° aa . w ~+ c~ , i , a+~ -i v~ Z ~ ~ o w•.~ a~ c~ a~ a o v c~ ~ ~o . i .n a a~ b . ~ a- , ao ~ a, a . aa . :cn w a~ ~a`~o c.°~ a v~a c°~ ~