HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.8 Shannon Architect SvcsCITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 11, 1988
SUBJECT Shannon Community Center Renovation
Architectural Services
EXHIBITS ATTACHED A. Summary of Proposals
B. Excerpts from Proposal for
Architectural Services - Associated
Professions, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve the revised scope of work
to include design services for both
the Phase I and Phase II
Improvements for FY87-88
2) Retain the firm of Associated
Professions, Inc. to provide
architectural services for Shannon
Center Renovation
3) Direct staff to prepare the
documents necessary to execute the
contract agreement at a cost not to
exceed $38,000
FINANCIAL STATEMENT Proposed Fee - $32,000-$38,000
$195,800 is available in FY87-88
for Shannon Center Improvements
DESCRIPTION At the January 25, 1988 meeting of the
Dublin City Council the Council approved the Request for
Proposals for Phase I of Shannon Center Renovation and authorized
staff to advertise for consultants. Initially seven
architectural firms submitted proposals for the suggested Phase I
improvements. However after reviewing the proposals, the scope
of work associated with the Phase I improvements and the timeline
for implementation of the work, staff agreed that it could be
more cost effective and time saving to do the design and
construction documents for both Phase I and Phase II
improvements in FY1987-88 and embark on the actual construction
in FY1988-89. Thus staff invited the top three firms to submit
addendums to their original proposals to include the additional
work associated with the Phase II improvements as well.
A summary of the three proposals is attached in Exhibit A.
After a thorough review
determined that Associate
suited to complete the wo
Shannon Community Center.
diversified design and
architecture and planning
surveying and electrical
Their proposed fee for
$14,500 to $18,000. If
their fee increases to
renovation as provided
Program is as follows:
of the proposals received, staff has
d Professions, Inc. of Livermore is best
rk associated with the renovation of the
Associated Professions, Inc. is a
engineering corporation and includes
civil and structural engineering, and
engineering as its major elements.
the Phase I improvements ranges from
the Phase II improvements are included
$32,000-$38,000. The budget for the
for in the 1986-91 Capital Improvement
PHASE I
PHASE II
FY87-88
FY88-89
TOTAL
Design
$17,175
$20,920
$38,095
Inspection
$ 6,870
$ 8,365
$15,235
Construction
$1 71 , 755
$209,1 85
$380, 940
TOTAL
$195,800
$238,470
$434,270
----------------------------------------------------------------- 6c
ol
COPIES TO: Associated Professions Inc. „Q,
ITEM NO. ♦ null j'
Agenda Statement - Shannon Community Center Renovation
April 1 1, 1 988
Page Two
Their proposed fees falls within the budget for design and
inspection services. A copy of their proposal is attached in
Exhibit B.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of staff that the Council
take the following action:
1) Approve the revised scope of work to include design
services for both the Phase I and Phase II
Improvements for FY87-88.
2) Retain the firm of Associated Professions, Inc. to
provide architectural services for Shannon Center
Renovation.
3) Direct staff to prepare the documents necessary to
execute the contract agreement at a cost not to exceed
$38,000.
EXHIBIT A
Shannon Community Center Renovation
Summary of Revised Proposals
Associated Professions, Inc. Chester powles, Jr./Daniel Hi.llmer, Associ.ated Architect Hanson, Murakami, Eshima
-1200 liast :lvenua 1898 Hyde Street 429 Second Street
Livermore, CA 9~550 San Francisco, CA 99109 Oakland, CA 94607
Proposed Pro~ect Team Proposed Proiect Team
President - Randall H. Schlientz Principal-In-Charqe - Chester Bowles
Principal in Charge - Norman Eiong Project Manager - Daniel Hillmer
Project Ar chitect.- Wynn Neti~ton Structural Engineer - Forell/Elsseser
Structural Engine2r - Frank Linhart Mechanical & Electrical Eng. - Hansen & Slaughter
Electrical Engineer - Glenn Polzin
Ncoustical Consultant - Clzarles Salter Assoc. Fee Ranqe
Fee Ranqe Phase I $19,542
Phase I & II $95,558
Phase I - $14,500
Phase I & II - ~32,000
Hourly Rates
Principal
Project Architect/Engineer
Senior Architect/Engineer
F.rchitect/Engineer
Drafters
Clerical
$1II,000
$38,000
$95.00
$75.00
$60.00
$53.00
$15.00 - $49.00
$26.00
Timeline (Phases I & III
Preliminary Design 7 weeks
Construction Documents 7 weeks
Review 4 weeks
Biddinq 4 weeks
Ccntract Review 2 weeks
Ccnstruction 16 we~ks
Hourlv Rates
Principal $70.00
Project Manager $50.00
Architect ~30.00
Timeline (Phases I & II)
Preliminary Design
Construction Documents
Review/Bidding
ContraCt Review
Construction
6 weeks
8 weeks
6 weeks
2 weeks
2Ei weeks
Total
12-1/2 months
Proposed Prolect Team
Project Leader - John Clelson
Project P.rchitect - Lorna Dare
Structural Engineer - David L. Messinger &^r.ssoc.
Mechanical Engineer - Yamamoto Engineering
Electrical Engineer - ~9ilkinson Engineerir.g
Fee Ranqe
Phase I $21,000 - Sz~, 000
Phase I& II 545,000 - 350, 000
Hourly Rates
Principal 380-5100
Senior Architect 560-580
Project Architect 560-570
Senior Draftsperson/Designer S45-S60
Draftsperson/Designer $30-540
Timeline (Phases I & ZI)
Preliminary Design 8 ~aeeks
Construction Documents 6 weeks
Review 4 weeks
Bidding 4 weeks
Contract Negotiations 2 weeks
Construction 12 weeks
Total 9 months
'Ibtal 10 months
~ :~..: ~ . ~E~ov~~riorv o~:
. .
~ : ~ i ; .
.:: :::;: ~::~ :::::::
~~ : ::~::: : ~:~::~:
::~~~ ~..
:::::~ :~ :~ ~:~::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::
~
~ r.
.
~ _ .
~
~'!
~
~ ~ ~
~~~
~~~
:, ,
;-
t ,
.° - - -~ •-
. Y.I--~+'+' ' _
' .,rry~_-~;:'.~...."~ .~'
'
2` i
. . ~ ' ~
-
~ •+
rt~ ~!'t F
l
y,
k,
7-~ :9
£C ~ .
. ~ ~
1
;q
~ ~.. 5 t .:T ,~~".
~~
'
#
~ ~~
r
~
ser ~
~'i 'f f l
~
~...t:•, k , ~~. ~.s y r
.
1 F .
. _ ~ . ,.~
t -. ,. ~ .~ , t _.,,..~ .. ,x ..... ,e.
C` _ a
_ . ; r, .,~ .:~. I._ .. ~.' ~ ;
:~ .~ ~•~ t . ~
•' • ~ ' ~~~ ' ,
i..yt J ./ . • ~ !
R . ~ 1' 'i ~ . "r , . I
_i v e
i
.- `~}~ . . . a
1` ~ . I~
~'~~,~1`+{{ l,, •jt, rt"L~~'~ i ;J,tt.-..~ ~ ~ .~ ~ .
~JJ~,~•1~~! ~` f ~~~' ,
~~j~~J~11 '''t'~ ~ ~, . ~,,
i I 1 ~ ~ T ~ ,t I ~ ~ .~..~ r i.-r..~.r~:;. ' - - ~ . . ~
- ~ ~11~~. ~~`•,` . - ... =~:::=~° ;
.., . . -., ,
~~:~~ ~ . ,
:- ~
, R ~
,
"~_-r _ 'x . -
-.F
_ , Z-i `~ ,~ ~i .
'~~
i ,
~
~i
I (
~ . . 1
~~r .•-" : . . ,
'~ , ,
.. _ ~. , ~ . , ~ ~
.'...r `~. • t _ . . . .
.~ ' ' • !
)r y ~ ~
.~~ ! j~ i _ ~ .F' ' - . , , . ~
5~ ~ t h .F't ~ . Y .
1 b ~~ G r~ . ~'' ~ .
~ A ~` ~iS y~ L '~+ ~ ~ - ~--.. ~ -_ \ a V 5 . .
4 ~
~.
~'.t'.x _a* ~-r . ~..:: ~° .: ~,- tj~ ~x .. .. ~
a.~ J G~4 ' 3 ~ :. . . . ~ : . . 1 "j,,:.. _ .. . .
'=Y; ~ +°i _ _ , ' . ~ S . ,. . ' . ." . . ~
' i - . . ~ - . . , . . ~
','~ SC.... . ' . • ~~' .
_y ~~ ~PSa. ~
~ ' '
f :- i, '~. #' : ( " - . ` " .
. . ~
~Y
~ '
~~
~ ~
' .
,
.
'~`
~
~ #
~ ' ~
'
~
ir
:
~ ..
1
• . . .
V . .
.
~ .~.~kd~Y . .
~ , .Si . -
~ '
~
~
~r
ti:: . . .
.. . _
..
~Y3
~' . ~ ~
~ ~ . . .
i
d
~
Mr k 3.~.~
~ -
4 a `. t ~ ,
; ' ~ ~
., .. .
,
* ' ,
_
' ' . . , . , . .
y~q(~. , ..- .
~::~~~.~.~:~-: -_:., ;-~ ~ P r e p a r e d B y:
r .
.~ ,
~ ~°-, ~ ~ ,A~sociatec~ Pr~f~ssion~ inc.
~,~;:~"~~` Planners • . Enginee~s • Architects • Surveyors
~ -~ .. -. .
~~ ~~ -~ 4200 East Avenue, Livermore, California 94550
~:x. N.
~~;; - . -
~::
~..
.9~'_ _
~..
cF-,
'.;P.i
`P~"' " ........:..... .
.. . . ..... ........ : ...: .........:. :w::::::::::::._:.~:::•)}:~:<•}i}Y }:::.~:: :w::v:::::.~:5r: i::<~>i>:~ `C~:Y?ii:{i{L:ji??}i}?}fi~~ii>?ii}i}}iii}i
.: za5.•-.,:+'f":~_ ................................ .......
..j,~,~.;~s _ .. _ .... ........ ... .. ................... ...........~. ......
+~. 3 ~` 3~'~ -- :. ~ ' ' " . . . - . .
WY T~ ~ d ..~. '. . . ~ . '... ' ...• . .. __ . '. . . .
4a 1 . . '
~ "4`' ~'i ti x~ f . .~' . . . . . ~ .
-yeyt;,~n,~..:.~....,......_ .., .v..... - . . .. . ~
(415) 4~17-4017
~
~
i
We at Associated Professions perceive this to be a
unique project and a unique opportunity. The Shannon
Community Center is a graceful building situated in a
beautiful setting. The multitude of improvements
required should not impose on or destroy the charac-
ter of the community center. We believe,that a dedi-
cated team of professionals is needed to sensitively
restore this building, and we believe that our firm
embodies those unique requirements.
API has a dedicated team of specialists all within
our own staff, with prior experience in similar work.
Our in-house team would include an Architect, Struc-.
tural Engineer, Civil Engineer and Electrical Engi-
neer. We have an excellent Mechanical Engineer,
Entek, wha specializes in restorative work and energy
conservation. Our team would involve our firm with
only one outside consultant. If we were retained to
do Acoustics work as well we would retain an Acoustic
Engineer, Salter & Associates, with whom we have
worked previously.
The core Design Team would involve our office team
with only one outside Mechanical consultant. This
close-knit team approach is particularly important
when dealing with a variety of small, but inter-re-
lated, design problems. Our firm is expert in this
size project. Most of our work is $250,000 to $1
million in size. our close proximity to the project
site (15 minutes) means quick response time and easy
accessibility.
We believe that our prior experience in this projec~
type, our in-house team of pro~essionals, and our
close proximity make API uniquely qualified for this
project.
BACKGROUND Associated Professions, Inc. has a 27 year history~
in the Tri-Valley region. Organized in 1960 by
Earl Mason of Livermore and known originally as
Mason and Associates, the firm has been instrumen-
tal in the surveying and planning of subdivisions
and communities along the 580 corridor. The Archi-
tectural Division was initiated in 1961 and has
. been managed by Randall Schlientz since 1965.
Together with Norm Hong, with API since 1971, our
Architectural Division has designed many of the
. commercial, industrial and residential buildings
in~ the area.
CAPABILITIES Associated Professions, Inc. is a diversified
design and engineering corporation, and includes
Architecture and Planning, Civil and Structural
Engineering, and Surveying and Electrical Engi-
neering as its major disciplines, in two offices
within the state. Our combined capabilities allow
API to provide a complete professional design ser-
vice.
FINANCIAL STABILITY We have a quarter of a century of experience in
business and client service. Our diversity
strengthens our financial base and allows us to
weather changing patterns of growth and develop-
ment. With an average Gross Receipts over the
last 5 years of over 2 million dollars per year..
API anticipates a stable financial future with
steady growth.
Our Professional Liability insurance cov-
ers us and protects our clients as well.
$1,000,000 in both Professional and General Liab-
ility is supplemented by an active Professional
Education Program by our insurance carrier. Addi-
tionally our firm has just completed a Peer Review
Program designed to objectively review the organi-
zation and staffing, management and technical
expertise of our staff, and provide positive input
for improvement of the firm, an evaluation of the
firms management practices. We are one of few
firms who have yet undergone the Peer Review, and
are pleased with the outcome.
Certificates of Insurance are available upon
request.
_, .. ' .
_ :. _:
1;'<;.
, , :. :
, >.:
RANDALL H. SCHLIENTZ As President of Associated Professions, Inc.
ARCHITECT, AIA Randy oversees the operation of management in our
Architectural Division. His 23 years with API
enable him to provide valuable guidance to the key
players for each project, and to contribute
insight on local conditions which can only be
gained through years of experience in this region.
EDUCATION ~Bachelor of Arts in Architecture 1957
University of California, Berkeley
REGISTRATION California - 1965; Arizona - 1977
EXPERIENCE Randy has had considerable experience in the
design of public and private buildings. Prior to
his partnership in API, he was emplyed with the
English firm of Gerald Banks, F.R.I.B.A. near
Oxford, England and was responsible for the design
and production of several sizeable projects. His
experience while with other California firms
includes primarily school design.
PROFESSIONAL American Institute of Architects, East Bay Chapter
ORGANIZATIONS American Institute of Architects, California
Council
_ _ _. .. ....
, <2 . :
NORMAN HONG As Principal - in - Charge for this project
ARCHITECT, AIA and limited partner with API, Norm will provide
valuable job management capabilities and 15 years
of technical expertise as a licensed Architect.
Norm manages the day-today aspects of our Archi-
tectural Division and is actively involved in each
project from conception to completion.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Architecture 1966
University of California, Berkeley
REGISTRATION State of California 1973
EXPERIENCE Norm's experience in Architecture and Civil Engi-
neering includes service as a Captain with the
United States Air Force as a civil engineering
officer with and architectural specialty, in
charge of the Construction Management for 26 Lock-
heed aircraft support facilities totaling over 28
million dollars. and other large planning and pro-
gramming projects. He also participated in the
design of various commercial and residential
buildings, while employed in the Sacramento area.
PROFESSIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS
While with API Norm has designed a large variety
of Architectural projects including various office
buildings, banks, restaurants and industrual
facilities. Norm was the project architect f~r an
extensive study of handicapped accessibility prob-
lems found within the Livermore Ualley Joint Uni-
fied School District's 15 schools.
His experience at API includes the design of the
Young California Building Exhibition Hall at the
Alameda County Fairgrounds, and the Livermore Area
Park District Community Center addition.
American Institute of Architects, East Bay Chapter
American Institute of Architects, California
Council
_
,, ;
$
WYNN E. NEWTON As Project Architect for the proposed Shannon
ARCHITECT, AIA Community Center Renovation, Wynn will utilize
her strong technical background and experience
with commercial buildings, design for the disabled
and renovation.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts in Architecture 1981
University of California, Berkeley
REGISTRATION State of California 1987
EXPERIENCE Wynn has a background in industrial, commercial,
residential, and educational building projects.
While in the Stockton area, she participated in
several extensive remodeling projects for the Uni-
~ versity of the Pacific, the San Joaquin County
Jail, including the Men's Maximum Security and the
Women's Honor Farm, as well as many commercial
remodels and tenant improvements. Other projects
include new commercial facilities, such as the
Stockton Shelter for the Homeless and Crystal Val-
ley Winery, Yountville,Ca.
PROFESSIONAL American Institute of Architects, Sierra Valley
ORGANIZATIONS Chapter
American Institute of Architects, California
Council
;;
,
': ' ` ', _ ,
; _ .
:
,; : 4
FRANK J. LINHART Our Structural Engineer has been with API for 10
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER years. A limited partner with API, Frank's asso-
ciation with the firm allows us to coordinate the
Engineering, Analysis, and consultation required
in building design and modification, and design
structural solutions in a timely and cost-
effective manner.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering 1976
University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA
REGISTRATION 1979 - Civil Engineering
1983 - Structural Engineering
EXPERIENCE . A specialist in wood-frame construction design and
analysis, Frank has designed a variety of mid-
sized commercial structures, and, most recently,
supervised the construction of the multi-million
dollar Triad Facility in Livermore. Other pro-
jects for which he is responsible include the
Eschen Medical Buildings, Livermore, Lakeshore
Plaza Condominiums, San Mateo, and Brookmeadow
Park Recreation Building in Livermore.
PROFESSIONAL Structural Engineers Association of Northern
ORGANIZATIONS California
American Society of Civil Engineers
';S .:.
GLENN POLZIN API's Electrical engineer provides our team the
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER electrical expertise to design power distribution
systems, lighting and HVAC controls and layout,
and a comprehensive plan for current and future
power needs in buildings.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering 1960
University of Wisconsin
REGISTRATION State of California
Professional Electrical Engineer No. E-6575
EXPERIENCE While working for the Lawrence Livermore Labora-
tory, Livermore, California and Mercury, Nevada,
Glenn designed electrical power distribution and
lighting systems, and researched equipment con-
trol, including large scale direct current recti-
fier systems. Nis experience with API includes
Livermore National Bank, Livermore; First Baptist
Church, Dublin; Lake Mobile Home Park in Stockton
and the Emperor's Garden Restaurant in Livermore.
PROFESSIONAL Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
ORGANIZATIONS
>.
a
The scope of required Architectural Services
as outlined in the request for proposal, requires
some clarification, and we have included the
following items in our Fee Proposal:
1. We feel that it would be most cost-effective
for the City of Dublin to consider sharing the
Construction Inspection, thereby using our firm on
an hourly basis in this capacity. It is rarely
neccessary to have the Architectural firm on sit.e
for complete Construction Inspection service, par-
ticularly for a job of this nature, and we feel
the cost to you would be excessive.
2. As a part of the Contract Administration phase
we would review submittals, issue payment certifi-
cates, etc., but change order items would be
billed on an hourly basis, as extras.
3. API, as part of our service to the City of
Dublin, would make required site inspections in
the preliminary design.phase, prepare and present
preliminary plans, cost estimates and outline spe-
cifications for City Staff and Park and Recreation
Commission and City Council Review.
Following review, API would prepare final plans,
specifications, cost estimates and bid doc~ments,
and assist in pre-bid and pre-construction meet-
ings. .
; ; , ; ,,
,
, :, ; . . . > . :
,.; . , ;<
;.;; - ;. :
;:: > :., . .: : ; ;:. ; ;
>: ,:....
In In reviewing the detailed Building Improvement
Plan for the proposed Renovation to the Shannon
Community Center, it has become apparent to our
staff that many of the costs, as estimated by Han
sen/Murakami/Eshima, Inc. may not reflect 1988
construction costs, may not be accurate, or may
vary widely because of job conditions which cannot
be anticipated. Some costs might be eliminated,
some might be added, depending on actual improve-
ment choices. For example:
1. Inspection of the existing toilet facilities
reveals the need for new toilet partitions, or at
least re-surfacing of the existing partitions, in
addition to the need to move at least the parti-
tion adjacent to the proposed new handicapped
stall. Any work done that requires moving parti-
tions will effectively ruin the floor in this
area, which does not comply with current sanitary
requirements anyway. However, new flooring should
also be installed in the corridors outside the
restrooms, and also in the vestibule outside the
Kitchen door, because the surface is lifting and
presents a hazard to occupants. Additionally, the
floor in the Kitchen will need to be modified when
new cabinets are installed. It seems reasonable,
then, to assume that new floor coverings should be
installed in all of these related areas.
2. API would review the need to replace the
Kitchen lighting. It is unclear whether the
lighting has been determined to provide inadequate
lighting levels or if there is another reason for
its proposed replacement.
3. The Building Improvement Plan calls for moving
the Non-complying exit door in the Pre-School out
by 8" or so, in order to provide the required
2'-0" clear space on the strike side of the door.
This modification would require significant work
to the exterior of the building, including pos-
sible replastering, roofing of the new area, and
extensive flashing. The final result would be
unsightly and expensive.
(continued)
' ; ,' ; ; <'
:: ;
:.
_
_..
, ,
; `:
;
;
>
;: < : <:., ,:. ,.
; ,;;; ; 8 ;.
<; , . : ,: ..
Our inspection of the Pre-School doors revealed
the existance of two original doors which have
been closed off. One of these will be removed if
the proposed building plan is implimented but the
other could be utilized in lieu of moving the
existing door out. The non-complying door could be
transformed into a fixed glass light.
4. The double doors in the Pre-School room are
presently in use. They do not comply with exit
requirements, however, because they have flush-
bolts, and do not have knobs. Proper hardware
should be installed on these doors as well.
5. Other doors have flush bolts which are prohi-
bited.
6. The required exit doors in the West Room are
impeded by draperies, and would be unusable for
exiting when these drapes are closed. Study
should be done regarding this situation.
7. API feels that the cost to install the eleva-
tor and related walls, structures and entry, will
be higher than the estimated $60,000.
;~
A more detailed study of the existing conditions
and further evaluation of the proposed solutions
is required. The items noted above are only indic-
ative of the conflicts we see in the program and
are not intended to be all-inclusive. Our cost
estimates appear on our Fee Proposal, and may be
modified by changes in the program resulting from
a final study and recommendation.
Having reviewed the Building Improvement Plan and
taken an informal walk-thru of the project, as
well as a careful site review of currently recog-
nized problem areas we feel comfortable that we
have an understanding of the nature of the
project, and are interested in participating with
the City of Dublin in the proposed upgrade of this
community landmark. The building is a fine piece
of work, and, with careful and thoughtful plan-
ning, can be made more useful to the children,
seniors, handicapped persons and others who visit
and use the Shannon Community Center, without com-
promising the character of the building or its
surroundings.
_ 14: :::
SHANNON COMMUNITY CENTER
RENQVATION
DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
DESCRIPTION Preliminary Plans, Cost Estimates. amd Specifica-
tions
Final Plans, Specifications, Cost Esti-
mates
Bid Documents, Pre-Bid Meeting, Pre-
Construction Meeting
Construction Inspection.
WORK COST TOTAL
ARCHITECTURAL
Administration and Review $2,000
Working Drawings b8,500
~ ~ $10,500
CONTRACT Bid Phase $1,000
ADMINISTRATION Contract Administration $3,000
SUBTOTAL • ~4,000
STRUCTURAL Structural Engineering $2,000
ENGINEERING
$2,000
TOTAL $16,500
(continued, next page)
~.w..~_,_ ~_ _.._ ~. ~ . .. _ - - -
FEE RANGE Our proposed fee will be within the range of
$14,500 to $18,000. We anticipate that changes to
the program and resulting changes in the scope of
our services will modify the contract price.
CONDITIONS A. The Proposal is based in part on the estimates
by Hansen/Marakame/Eshima, Inc. Our services
include improvements for Phase 1 only, and assume
to be correct the recommendations made by the
, Building Improvement Plan~. If, in our estimation
during the preliminary planning stage, we find
that other codes require additional work, or that
more or less work is necessary, our fees will be
revised.
B. Our estimates also take into consideration
and revise the costs as estimated by Han-
sen/Murakami/Eshima..
Total Phase 1 work shall include:
a. Install single door hardware $2,350
b. Install double door hardware $5,000
c. Replace dbl doors at East Rm ~3,000
d. Ext. Landing level w/int. flr. $1,000
e. Temp. glass in hazard. locations $1,500
f. Safety film on glazing above exits $1,500
g. Handrails (int. and ext.) $6,500
h. Relocate doors to achieve 18" jambs $2,000
i. Corridor from N. Entry thru E.Meeting $7,500
Rm. and Storage Rm. .
j. Kitchen (remove pantry, warmer, $30,000
replace cabinets. New Wolf range,
oven, mocrowave, ventilatiorr and
lighting).
k. Elevator (including new Entry, $75,000
courtyard access and corridor thru
Pre-School Room
1. Accessible drinking fountain and ~2,000
telephone.
m. Make existing Restroom handicapped $15,000
accessible, increase lighting; light,
non-absorb. finishes.
n. New lower level restrooms $25,000
o. Exterior access to lower level $5,000
restrooms (ramp w/handrail)
p. Brace wood Chandeliers $1,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ~ $183,350
Exclusive of Fees
:::~ :~: ;::>.
PROFESSIONALS
AND OFFICE STAFF Principal, Architect, Engineer
Project Architect, Engineer
Senior Architect, Engineer
Architect, Engineer
Senior Drafter
Design Architect or Engineer
Drafter Technician III
Drafter Technician II
Drafter Technician I
. Apprentice Drafter
Secretarial
REIMBURSABLE Travel Expense
COSTS '
RATE
$95.00
$75.00
$60.00
~53.00
$44.00
$42.00
$35.00
$28.00
$23.00
$15.00
$26.00
$ ..25/mile
Consultant Fees and Agency Fees
and other Reimbursable Costs will be
subject to an Administration Fee. Cost + 15%
_
:
; ;;;
; ':
;»>. , .
- . 18;
,:: :. . ,.: _ :
>:: ,. ;
V
w
0
O
z
U
O
a
w ~~~
v~
~ ~ .
Q
J
~
~ ~:ti~: '
~
~
~
~-
Q
~ ~
~
Q
~
Q
~ .
.
m
W
LL.
Z
Q
~
W
~
a
_
G.
y
o u•~
.~ v~
a a.o
0~0 ~z A
.~ ~ ~:
~n v u~ o
v u~
A c0 ~>,
p~ u
p, •.-I P~+ •~
~+ b.~ U
cU UI
~' W~y I
•ri •rl
p a~ .~ 3
•,~ ~n v v
~ o~+ ,~
a~ c~ a>
s~ v
~__ _. x
'• ~
~
a
~
~
a
u
0
Q
G
O
•rl
u u
~ v
~+ a
G~
o ~
c~ v
u•
rl cU
c~ ~
G•~
•rl 4.~
f=. tn
W
N
~+ u
~ cn m
' a. 0
v c.~
! s~
. ~ a .
~ ~,
;
~
x v
u•~
c~.~ 0~4' e
G~ o~
0,1 ~C G
rl r-1 •rl
w a a.+
aJ
~+ ~, v
O a~ ~
v-~ •rl
CJ 'b
~+ •~
•~ ~: oa
5 ro ~
a a ; v
~•~ ~+
c~ ~.; ; a.
~ i j I
.
u]
~ R1
~.c
~ w
i.o
'•~
ca .;
~ ~~ .
0
~
.~
v
~
~
3 o
v ,i
,i a.+
D u
v ~
P: 1+
~.+
u Ul
U .{'.
ro o
~+ c~
~ v
o ~+
c~ a
~
~i
.~ ~
a~ .~
u a
~
~+ ~
u O
(A rl
G J.+
O U
U~
~+
~ u
'iao G
v o
m c~
REFERENCES Livermore Area Recreation and Parks District
Bill Payne, General Manager
447-7300 .
County of Alameda
Guy Richards, Senior Architectural Project Manager
670-5450 ~
Diocese of Oakland
Clem Finney, Architectural Engineering Coordinator
893-4711
City of Livermore
. Lee Horner, City Manager
449-4020
Veterans Hospital of Livermore
Marvin 0'Rear, Hospital Administrator
447-2560
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District
Rudy D'Ambra, Director of Facilities Planning
447-9500
:'~~:~.:. .;.
~.w,; r~
ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS
4200 EAST AVENUE
LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA 94550
(415) 447-4017
INTRODUCTION The following package is a supplement to
Associated Professions previous submittal
" titled "Proposal For Architectural Services,
Renovation To: Shannon Community Center", ~~
dated February 29, 1988.
CONTENTS Revised Fee Schedule and Project Schedule f~r
Addendum 1
Resume for Acoustical Engineering Consultant
Resume for Mechanical Engineering Consultant
SHANNON COMMUNITY CENTER
RENOVATION
DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
DESCRIPTION Preliminary Plans,
Cost Estimates, and
Specifications
Final Plans, Specifications, Cost Estimates
' Bid Documents, Pre-Bid Meeting, Pre- _.
Construction Meeting
Construction Inspection
FEE RANGE Our Proposed fee will be within the range of
$32,000 to $38,000. We understand that,
because of unknown building conditions, the
scope of work may involve more or less than
is itemized in the "Building Improvement
Plan". Our fee would be negotiated accord-
ingly. Additionally, should our firm make
recommendations which change the items
included in the project, we would adjust our
fee appropriately.
The rate schedule which we submitted pre-
viously will apply. .
~ ~
a. ; ...
Q , ~u
>
~v
~ ~
Q o
3
~
a~
~
w r
~ ~
N
~ N
Z t
Q ~
7 ~
~
U v
~ ~
,
~
> ~
~ ,
Z
~
F- =
~
O ' . ....
I- °
o- o
`
~ c.
N
V
~
:
Q :~::
3
J ''f:'r: • .C
~: f:~ ~
~ ~ \
W ~=
Z a~
~
- ~
-~
. c
co
L
} C~
~ ~
~
~ O
v
a
Q ' ~
r
~
~
~ . ~.
o
a
~ . d
.~ a
~ O
0
q
V
,G o N
O ~ ~
~
U] v~ G
.~ v~ 1.r U7
~a
xv ,~
~
~
~ .
.v
W ~ cn~ ~ ~ v aUi > i
a
y
Q a~o ~z A G- U~ o ~ O u~i O
C
= .,~ ~n w
cn a~ m o o ~n
v v
G~ o~
3 0
~
~.~
u N
'
a v u G
A ~1 cC 9, ~
r-1 ct3 oJ cd G
r-i r-1 •rI v
•~-1 t~ a
~
>,~a ~ ~,~ wa ~ a~, ~ ~ o .
cU N U FL+ U1 O L~ ~ d ~ ~ q+J . W
C W~ I
•rl •rl W
Cl w~+
U 'b
•~ ~n
cS1
c ~ v1
U .f+
cd o O U
U'.7
N ~-.
O
p ,~ .~ 3
•,~ u~ a, a ~+ ,~
~a u~ ~+
•~+ ,~ ° aa .
w ~+ c~
, i
, a+~
-i v~
Z
~ ~ o w•.~
a~ c~ a~ a o
v c~ ~ ~o . i
.n a a~ b .
~ a- ,
ao ~
a, a . aa . :cn w a~ ~a`~o c.°~ a v~a c°~ ~