The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 141-00 Levy Assess MAD99-1RESOLUTION NO. 141 - 00 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION CONFIRMING REPORT, ORDERING ANNEXATION, AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AND TRACT 7067) The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: This City Council has taken a series of actions preliminary to ordering the annexation and improvements in Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 99-1 (Dublin Ranch and Tract 7067) and now makes the following findings and orders: 1. The City Council adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for Annexation of Tract 7067, for the improvement described therein under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and directed the City Engineer, as Engineer of Work for the assessment district, to prepare the report required by Section 22565, and following, of the Streets and Highways Code. The improvement is generally described as follows: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public street lighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements within private streets within the District Boundaries, as shown on the approved improvement plans for the existing tracts throughout the District as well as, the proposed annexation of Tract 7067, including, but not limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service.boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with all incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the street lighting system. 2. The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed, and the City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention calling a hearing on the report as required by Section 22587 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of the hearing was given by publication and by mailing to affected property owners, all according to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Affidavits of publication and mailing were filed with the City Clerk. 3. At the time and place for which notice was given, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to object to the proposed improvement, the extent of the assessment district, or the proposed assessment. 4. The City Council finds that written protests against the proposed improvement have not been made by owners representing more than one half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement. 5. The documents and events described in Paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, are stated herein tabular form, with their dates and, where appropriate, their numbers. All documents are now on file with the City Clerk. Document or Event Date Number a. Resolution Initiating Proceedings 5/16/00 70-00 b. Filing of Engineer's Report 6/1/00 N/A c. Resolution Preliminarily Approving Engineer's Report 6/6/00 84-00 c. Resolution of Intention 6/6/00 85-00 d. Certificate of Mailing Notice 6/16/00 N/A e. Affidavit of Publication of Notice 6/16 & 23/00 1825353 7/18 & .f. Public hearings to be conducted 8/1/00 TBD 6. The City Council approves the Engineer's Report and each component part of it, including each exhibit incorporated by reference in the report. 7. The City Council finds that the Engineer of Work, in the Engineer's Report has fairly and properly apportioned the cost of the improvement to each parcel of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each parcel, respectively, from the improvement. The City Council hereby confirms and levies each individual assessment as stated in the Engineer's Report. 8. The City Council orders the improvement described in Paragraph 1, as detailed in the Engineer's Report, confirms the annexation of Tract 7067, and the levying of assessments for Fiscal Year 2000-01. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1~t day of August, 2000. AYES: Counciimembers Howard and Zika, Vice Mayor Lockhart and Mayor Houston NOES: None ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmember McCormick None AT TE S T~~j.~j~~ ~_ g:\assessdist\99- B20(kLr s~evy K2/G/8-1-00/reso-levy99-1.doc (Item 6.8) ~ -~/4ayor~ 2 - ENGINEER'S REPORT e :3 c;( 1-.3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA AND TRACT 7067) (PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972) 7/' Ci ! 00 ENGINEER OF WOR THE UNDERSIGNED RESPECTFULLY SUBMITS THE ENCLOSED REPORT AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL q DATED: I'll 0'. ()() g-f-()() _.._..~ e e ( d{;. ., ./'~ ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ~ LEE THOMPSON, City Engineer of the City of Dublin and Engineer of Work for Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 99-1 (Dublin Ranch Area and Tract 7067), City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The total assessment district area is 225.5 acres as shown in Part A (the Assessment Diagram and Boundaries Map) of this report. The "ultimate improvements" consist of: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public street lighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements within priyate streets within the District Boundaries, as shown on the approved improvement plans for the following Tracts: Final Maps 6925 and 6956 through 6964 and Tract 7067, including, but not limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with all incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the street lighting system. This report consists of five parts as follows: Part E - An Assessment Diagram and Boundaries Map showing all of the real property within the Assessment District. An estimate of the annual maintenance costs for the planned "ultimate improvements" to be maintained. An Assessment Roll detailing the estimated cost of the maintenance on each residential parcel within the Assessment District. A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel. A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. Part A - Part B - Part C - Part 0 - This District is being established to pay for maintenance, operation, and repair of the proposed street light fixtures, which differ from the City Standard. A special light fixture has been proposed to create a community element which is a benefit to the future homeowners within the proposed District boundary. Page 2 e e ,;" s; ~/ ./..:) 1,/ PART A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND BOUNDARIES MAP STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 PAGE I (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) PAGE 2 (TRACT 7067) SEE REDUCED COPY ON FOLLOWING PAGES Page 3 w ;;: w ,.. oiE ~15Ii~~ ~~g~:o ::JO~ c:; g ",w ~'-' ;;;iE:5t!~ ~ I-b~~~ ~ ~B~!iE;;:~~ Vi5U<ca:;:~ l):l8:ivl:Zo~ < iilt!~ 1- ~5~~~ ~ e e ~ ~ ffi~ 0. :o~ ~~~ "lSu ~?::15 z~ 68:;; '3 VlO ~;] c.:>::> ::JCD ....:. o 0:::- w row ~~ ZCL ~ ~ ;;;. ~ Sf ~ ;::; ;::; ~ ~ ~ ~~~~5F~;;; ~ N ~ ~~ '" z '" B :5 < 12 d U z z w,? W~:5 '" ;;:u ~ ;;:~~ 12 lS~ u ::J <:S ~:ZL5 < t!~lS 8~ w5~ u "'~ :00 Uuo ~lS,.. ~~~ ~~~>- l"z >0< c5 Wi::~ "lSU ~ts,,:o "0 ~~ I ~~lS << ~ 25 8 I ~8 :z~ Z:o oiE", ~B>o O!::::I.(I'l 13:5 ~~a: UU</> ~~~a:i5 u< f5~ CDZ ::l"::> ::>l>.. Zo cnr.o~::~~~;;;:: ~ ~tO..-_ III" ~ -.r :;:;::- ~ t> gJr;;~~~~~~~m ~ g m m m COlD to. to CD to ~., ~~ "'0 or- r- Z 0 Z g ~ N. ~~~ ~m~ 111111 "'''~ ;i ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 0, ~ ;;; t; in I:: z ~ ~ Ci f;; :;> ~ ,,; ~ " ~ }.. ~ ~ ;;; IS " "' " z '" Inm ~ ~;:..., "s- "w ~ ~~~ ('-.l t'~_ Sf II 11 II "'''~ 0 0 N I 0 0 0 N !' ;; ~l! ;., g ~ g i<l ,^ ~ ::: '" '" "s- o, ~ ;., " ~ z ~-- --~-- ~;i ~ 90 ~ !! := ~~ l.k -2 '" - =- 9';; i wt5 0,::: om "'. ~~ " ~o ~@ ;,. NN ..,,,, o~ z~ / " 'I :3 o o>S' I OJ OJ c:i ~ :2 I~~ ~ ~ ~~ E" :s VI;;;- ~ ......... ~ tJ :z ~e CO L:5 w ~ ::s:; 12 ~~ ~OC>-~05::;;J ~:~ W <( =i:c =:> 0 ~z6 en 050&i~Clg~h- [D Z c;:~ l1.. ::> ......,,~ ~ Vl~WiE 0 8 ~j ~ !:2zx >- ~. w:J I- CD ~ 8~c:l ?i ~ gs~ u :;;i~~ < o~. ~ z~ Z ---- I- 5:z i=' u i5e' z g :ire ~ ~~ c.:> z t= :r: c.:> ::J ~ 1i'i 8 ~ ~ '" ~ ;;; ~ 8 ~t5 ~ai ~ z ~: L-Jr: '.-~ N<n " ON ~0 IS '~ffi ",f':' ;;o;.::J IIUII cr <1_' .-/ o . 5~ ~~~ II n n "'''~ ~ ~ " ! ;; . I..'-'~ si6 0,. ~~ -N ~ ~ ~ ~ 3- ~ "-<~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ bZ u()8 Zb t'-o:::~C\J 31~~ CD<( ~ ~QU Ro... 8 ~~~ t)6J @ ~~~ ~~ j ~(/)~f-....J~ 8ti3P=l U z ~ (/) ;::J ~ >- N(/)n ::::J ~ ~<c 0::2 Z b ~ o ~ N () '" u~ e', ~ .,,,~ ti ~ ~~ ~~: ~CI'Il5~~ti 1:~ 1lirh,,;'1IIl~ _ ~ w > _:"::~ f~...J-l..JC':::c~~ ,,_~ <r 0- ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ... .- ~ci ~.... ~~~yj ...c;;J p~ "'G,., .d!~ ""' "" ~ ~ ~ e C" 0 ~ ~ ~ Co --N-- , ~ 11 - :::~ ~ " " e'tn g.~. 8 G8 ;;:0:. ~~I 50..: '-...Jc::. t:~?s a :>- ~t1~ ~ '" , >-5:: I Co , 1>.0 C1::':; 1 les '-'::;:, I S. _. I...., lij i:; l?= ~:; ", 1 ~~ 1 ~~~g 1 ~~~ I t!::'<>.:'<( ti~a , '.::..l~v 1 ~~~ 1 t ~~~ ! ~e;~~ al..JU) ~ ,... lQ ci IN "'" "" ~ on ~ .,.. ~ "'" ... ~ <C ... t; ~ c;;J ~ ';J .... ~ :.;! ~ ~" ~ ~ t-- ~ '~ h ;- " ~ ~ 2' 8 2'~ ~ ~ c.~ ~ Go, ~ r " ~ l ?t~ ~~ ~;; ,. '" " ~ f S ~. ~ tj I ~.~ Q ~ I ~"-=::: ,. V> t'sG ~ t;~ t!b c; '"' . ~:; 1 /::' e:~ I f~ ~ S~ I ~ 0::- 1:5 - ~~ l~~~ 1'-:"'\ ~:; 1~8 "'~ '~:3 Co I~ ~c; !(:)C'>l..... ~~ 1 , ::;'-.." !~~~ r"-Q ~'" .~i e~ l~ ~ 11::::8~ t~ lu ~ ,'-' ~ l'dl...J....' e ~ .~ ~ e N8~"02'JO.[ 2.H_~8' '3 '3 ~ h S 8 >... ;;:: ::::; <3 ~ o 0 ~, g t; ..J ~ 3J'fld 3SIYNIV.lNflOfV '" , ~ c:.J <- ~ ~. /~~ ~ 'f.~(, .6<; (":--/ -~ ~"<;~'$9,tc. .C'(: .".; M.OI.lL\<;g", ~ l> "" ",,"" '" "'~ f>., ~ ~f"') '" F"I;'\-: "'"" <1E< '" '" "" l-, "" ~p 5 ..J {~) ~ "'w "..' .S c.:> 2!;: to.. l:..-) <:'-:1; r-;.-: ... " ~~ ~.i J ?~ /.;' ; -/ n ~ ~ ~~ ; ~ e e r/ ,-/ /-5 /:; ;/'J , ~) PART B AN ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST OF THE ULTIMATE STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99.;.1 Fiscal Year 2000-2001 street lights to be installed = 288 T r otal street Iqhts estimated to be installed = 362 (ultimate improvements) Fiscal Year 2000- 2001 ENERGY COST Dublin Ranch Phase 1 (existing District) $8,280.00 Tract 7067 (annexation area) 360.00 $8,640.00 STANDARD MAINTENANCE Dublin Ranch Phase 1 (existing District) $9,834.00 Tract 7067 (annexation area) 466.00 $10,300.00 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (for both areas) Engineer's Report and cost of noticing $630 Annual Administrative Cost $498 $1.258.00 CAL-SLA Dues and Conference $130 Subtotal: $20,198.00 FUND FOR FUTURE POLE PAINTING Dublin Ranch Phase 1 (existing District) $2,940.00 Tract 7067 (annexation area) 150.00 $3,090.00 Subtotal: ! $23,288.00 Use of Existing Reserve to Offset Portion of Cost: $(12,187.00) Subtotal: $11,101.00 COUNTY COST OF COLLECTION AND DELINQUENCY Cost of collection @ 1.7% $424.76 Estimated delinquency @ 2% TOT AL FY 2000-2001 ASSESSMENT $11,525.76 7 TOTAL OF 864 LOTS $13.34 per lot Cash Balance Information: Be~innin~ Fund Balance, Julv 1, 1999 $(128.00) Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Estimated Revenue (assessment) $18,858.00 Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Estimated Interest Income $510.00 Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Estimated Expenditures $(851.00) Estimated Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 $18,389.00 Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Assessment: $11,525.76 Fiscal Year 2000-2001-Estimated Interest Income $830.00 Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Estimated Expenditures: $(20,198.00) Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Fund for Pole Paintinq ($3,090.00) Fiscal Year 2000~2001 Cost of Collection and Delinquency ($424.00) Estimated Fund Balance, July 1, 2001 . $7,032.76 Page 4 e e I ff /3 Part B continued In addition to the increase in the annual maintenance cost as a result of additional lights, the annual maintenance cost shall be increased annually beginning July 1, 2000, by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index ("Index") (applies to all costs except electricity), plus any actual increase in the cost of electricity. If the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index is unavailable or deemed by the City Council to be inappropriate, a comparable consumer price index, as approved by the City Council, shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index. SAMPLE CALCULATION: Assume an increase in the index of 1 % and a utility increase of 5%. IKJDEX INCREASE (ASSUMED 1 %) '19,911 x .01 = 199 $29,566 $(9,655) $19,911 $199 ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT COST LESS ENERGY COST (SUBJECT TO RATE INCREASE ONLY) ASSESSMENT SUBJECT TO INDEX1NCREASE ENERGY COST 5% UTILITY RATE INCREASE 9,655x.05 = 483 $9,655 $483 NEW TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST $30,248 Page 5 e e / ./1 '...:J /0 -J / PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 ZONE I Assessment No. Name of Property Number Annual Assessment Owner of Lots Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Ultimate Improvements Per Lot Total Per Lot Total" Lots 1-69 MSSH Mayfield LLC Tract 6957 69 13.34 920.46 34.22 2,361.18 Lots 1-86 MSSH Mayfield LLC Tract 6958 86 13.34 1,147.24 34.22 2,942.92 Lots 1-45 Standard Pacific Tract 6963 COrD. 45 13.34 600.30 34.22 1,539.90 Lots 1-113 Centex Homes Tract 6960 113 13.34 1,507.42 34.22 3,866.86 Lots 114-116 of First American Title Tract 6960 Corp. 300 13.34 .., 4,002.00 34.22 10,266.00 Future Tracts 6956,6959,6961 Lots 1-111 Standard Pacific Tract 6962 COrD. 111 13.34 1,480.74 34.22 3,798.42 Lots 1-123 Standard Pacific Tract 6964 Corp. 123 13.34 1,640.82 34.22 4,209.06 Tract 7067 Taylor Woodrow (annex area) Homes 17 13.34 226.78 34.22 581.74 LIOT AL: 864 13.34 I 11,525.76 34.22 i 29,566.08 I *Subject to incI'eases in index and actual utility cost. Page 6 e e /1 ,y/? /:J ,) PART D METHOD OF SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 DUBLIN RANCH AREA AND TRACT 7067 The maintenance of the street lighting within the boundaries of the Assessment District benefits each residential lot in the District in the same manner and to the same extent. Therefore, the Assessment has been equally apportioned over the proposed 864 planned single-family residential lots contained within the District. The per lot assessment will be $13.34 per lot for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, increasing to $34.22 (subject to inflation and utility rate increases) at buildout for all residential lots within the boundaries of the District on a per lot basis. All non-residential lots within the District have been excepted and will have a zero assessment since they receive no special benefit with regard to the special light fixture proposed. The following Lots 114, 115, and 116 of Tract 6960 will be subdivided at a later date. The projected lot counts are: Tract 6960 Lot 114 - Lot 115 - Lot 116 - 92 lots (future Tract 6956) 91 lots (future Tract 6959) 117 lots (future Tract 6961) Until they are subdivided, the assessment for these lots shall be equal to the per-lot assessment each year times the number of proposed lots within each Tract listed above, With the recording of the future Tract maps, the new assessments will be reapportioned to each of the individual residential lots, As more street lights are installed each year, until all 349 are installed, the assessment each year will be based on the estimated cost of maintenance (using the numbers in Part B, adjusted for inflation as noted in Part B), divided by the number of lights to be installed that year, provided in no event will the per lot assessment be more than $34.22 (as adjusted for inflation), It should be noted that future annexations to this District may affect the spread of assessments. It should be noted that future annexations to this Zone may affect the spread of assessments. Page 7 e e ;./J j'.'/-::S r:7"- .-" /---- -) PART E PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 Assessment No. Name of Property Owner Lots 1-69 . MSSH Mayfield, LLC Tract 6957 25 Metro Drive Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95110 Lots 1-86 MSSH Mayfield, LLC Tract 6958 25 Metro Drive Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95110 Lots 1-45 Standard Pacific Tract 6963 ."._. 3825 Hopyard Road Suite 195 Pleasanton CA 94588 Lots 1-113 Centex Homes Tract 6960 1855 Gateway Blvd. Suite 650 Concord CA 94520 Lots 114-116 of Tract 6960 First American Title Co. Future Tracts (Under Holding Agreement) 6956, 6959, and 6961 6681 Owens Drive Pleasanton CA 94588 Lots 1-111 Standard Pacific Tract 6962 3825 Hopyard Road Suite 195 Pleasanton CA 94588 Lots 1-123 Standard Pacific Tract 6964 3825 Hopyard Road Suite 195 Pleasanton CA 94588 ._-~.__._-_..~~~---~--~._-~ Lots 1-17 faylorWoodrow Homes Tract 7067 467 Hamilton Parkway Novato CA 94949-5008 J The above property owners and the City of Pleasanton and Dublin San Ramon Services District own additional non-residential properties such as community-owned open space parcels, proposed public facilities, and community owned recreation parcels, within the proposed Assessment District No. 99-1 boundaries, but they will have a zero assessment. P~ge 8 tit e /) e;")~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA AND TRACT 7067) CERTIFICATES I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Part B, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 1, 2000. c1 '-- I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify tha he foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, wa's preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 84-00, duly adopted by said Council on June 6, 20~0. -w r!]) . ( ~( J\;!ct . , I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify ~ the foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. ***, duly adopted by said Council on ***. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that tlle foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County o.r Alameda, California, on , 2000. Page 9