HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.06 Civic Cntr Completion CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 23, 1990
SUBJECT:
Final Acceptance of Civic Center Project
(Prepared by:.Paul S. Rankin, Assistant City Manager)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Proposed Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: ~AdoptResolution.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
See Below.
DESCRIPTION: At the City Council meeting on February 26, 1990, the City
Council authorized the filing of a Notice of Completion on the Civic Center
Project. Staff filed the Notice with the County Recorder on February 27,
1990.
In addition to filing the Notice, Staff was directed to negotiate a final
resolution of all outstanding issues. The City Attorney's Office and Staff
have been working diligently with representatives of DNI to reach an
agreement which is acceptable to both parties.
Attached is a proposed agreement which DNI has accepted. The agreement
includes a punch list of items remaining, along with a value for each item.
The City will only release the funds when the item has been corrected. The
total value of punch list items is $24,700. Although this appears to be a
significant number, two factors should be kept in mind. First, this
represents approximately 1/4 of 1% of the total construction cost.
Secondly, a large part of the monies withheld are related to landscape
items which was the last trade actively working on the project.
Approximately $16,750 of the total amount withheld for punch list items is
associated with landscape issues. Any items not corrected by June 1, 1990
will result in forfeiture of the value and the Contractor will be relieved
from further liability to complete the item. The Agreement does allow the
City to authorize an extension of up to 30 days.
In addition to retaining an amount to cover punch list items, the agreement
authorizes the City to retain $50,000. The Agreement is the result of a
compromise and does not reflect an admission of liability or responsibility
on either the City of Dublin or Dickman-Nourse, Inc. The Agreement also
stipulates certain indemnifications to be provided by each party and the
extent that each party is released from obligations arising from the
construction agreement.
FINANCIAL
The following breakdown identifies the final construction costs associated
with the Dickman-Nourse, Inc. Agreement:
Original Contract Amount
Change Orders as adjusted by Final Agreement
TOTAL Dickman-Nourse, Inc.
$9,695,000
179,627
$9,874,627
The Agreement with DNI is only one element of the overall Civic Center
Capital Project. Costs associated with the project have been incurred each
Fiscal Year since Fiscal Year 1985-86. The project was extremely complex
involving several contractors, consultants, and suppliers. The total
project cost presented in the June 1988 Capital Improvement Program has
remained unchanged and the project has been completed within those
parameters.
ITEM NO.
COPIES TO:
The following Table identifies the estimated final project cost compared to
the budget contained in the approved Capital Improvement Program:
DUBLIN CIVIC CENTER
COST BREAKDOWN AS NOTED IN CIP
ESTIMATED ACTUAL PROJECT COST
BUDGET
Cost of COP Issuance (1985)
Cost of COP Issuance (1988)
Underwriters Discount (1985)
Underwriters Discount (1988)
Sub-total Financing Costs
$ 88,726 $ 88,726
143,588 143,588
394,944 394,944
258,450 258,450
$ 885,708 $885,708
Design
Construction Mgt/Insp
Soils/Testing
Utilities
Bidding/Capitalized Taxes
Sub-total Soft Costs
812,389 864,706
421,364 470,044
75,741 79,916
217,633 217,633
61,115 61,919
$1,588,242 $1,694,218
Land Acquisition
Improvements(Buildings)
Furnishings/Equipment
Sub-Total
6,517,149
10,042,133
455,180
$17,014,462
6,517,149
9,881,050
453,459
$16,851,658
Budget Transfer for
Fountain Project
( 6,300) N/A
TOTAL PROJECT
$19,482,412
$19,431,584
As the City Council may recall, a 5% construction contingency was budgeted
at the beginning of the project. Given that the City was able to keep the
actual changes well within the 5% parameter, the funds were available to
cover additional design and inspection costs due to the extended
construction process. The bottom line is that the project has been
completed within budget and is being enjoyed as the central location for a
variety of community events.
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT
As described above, the total project costs are within the budget.
However, the expenses for Fiscal Year 1988/89 were less than the approved
Budget for that year and the opposite result occurred in Fiscal Year
1989/90. The extended construction period resulted in payment for project
expenses later than was anticipated in the approved Budget. Therefore, it
will be necessary for an additional appropriation to the Civic Center
Project for Fiscal Year 1989-90.
Staff will need to evaluate the amount of Dublin Information, Inc. (DII)
funds available, after accounting for all interest earnings and expenses.
The additional appropriation would be made from a combination of the
remaining DII funds and a General Fund contribution. The completion of
this transaction after all expenses are finalized will assure that 100% of
the DII funds developed from the Certificate of Participation financing are
expended at the final close of the project. The proposed resolution
authorizes Staff to make the additional appropriation for 1989/90as
necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution accepting the
improvements, approving the agreement, and authorizing an additional
appropriaton for Fiscal Year 1989/90. Also, the action will authorize
Staff to release any payments due DNI.
RESOLUTION N0. 45 - 90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF CIVIC CENTER PROJECT
AND A MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT WITH DICKMAN NOURSE, INC.
AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO MAKE AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION
WHEREAS, the Dublin Civic Center Project was constructed under an agreement with
Dickman Nourse, Inc. (DNI); and
WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the filing of a Notice of Completion, which
was recorded with the County Clerk on February 27, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Attorney's Office has developed a Mutual Release Agreement with
DNI; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement will authorize the final acceptance of the project and
establish a procedure for all amounts payable to DNI; and
WHEREAS, although the total project cost was within Budget, an additional
appropriation will be necessary for Fiscal Year 1989/90 due to expenses being incurred
later than anticipated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby take the following actions:
Accept the Dublin Civic Center Project Improvements in accordance with the Mutual
Release Agreement, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof.
Approve the Mutual Release Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute said
Agreement on behalf of the City.
Authorize the City Treasurer to issue all payments due Dickman-Nourse, Inc. pursuant
to the Mutual Release Agreement.
4. Authorize the Finance Director to make a supplemental appropriation of funds to the
Dublin Civic Center Project for Fiscal Year 1989/90. Said supplemental appropriation
shall be based upon final project costs and shall be made from remaining Dublin
Information, Inc. (DII) funds and any General Funds necessary to close the project. The
supplemental appropriation shall not result in a total project expense greater than the
total Civic Center project cost identified in the approved 1989 update to the 1988-1993
Five Year Capital Improvement Program.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of April, 1990.
AYES: Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Snyder, Vonheeder and Mayor Moffatt
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT
This agreement is entered into by and between the City of
Dublin ("City"), a municipal corporation and Dickman-Bourse, Inc.
("DNI"), a California Corporation.
RECITALS
A. On or about December 21, 1987, the City and DNI entered
into an agreement ("Contract Documents") for the construction of
the Dublin Civic Center ("project"). In order to fulfill its
responsibilities and obligations under the Contract Documents,
DNI subcontracted out portions of the work required by the
Contract Documents to various subcontractors.
B. The project is complete, the City occupied it on
September 30, 1989, accepted it on February 26, 1990 and recorded
a Notice of Completion on February 27, 1990.
C. During the project, disagreements have arisen between
the City and DNI regarding their rights and responsibilities
under the Contract Documents.
D. The parties to this agreement desire to resolve their
present disputes, settle their differences regarding the same,
provide for final payment and provide for mutual releases, with
certain specific exclusions, upon final payment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
forebearances set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. The City currently controls the sum of $100,000
in an escrow agreement for security deposits in lieu of
retention. The City agrees to instruct the escrow agent, Wells
Fargo Escrow Services, to release all securities held pursuant to
paragraph 14 of said escrow agreement. The City further agrees
to pay to DNI on April 24, 1990, and DNI agrees to accept, the
sum of $152,696.80 as and for final payment for the project
through Change Order #160 less the sum of $24,700 for the agreed
value of the punch list items set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein and less the sum of $50,000. The
City agrees to release the sums set forth in Exhibit "A" as each
punch list item is completed. If any punch list item remains
uncorrected in the reasonable determination of the City Engineer
by June 1, 1990, the sum attributable to its correction shall be
forfeited by DNI and DNI shall have no further liability to the
City for its completion subject, however, to exceptions in
paragraph 2 hereof, provided that City, in its reasonable
discretion, can extend the June 1, 1990, date by up to thirty
(30) days as to specified items on the punch list.
2. Except as set forth below, the City, its respective
officers, agents, predecessors, successors, assigns and related
entities ("First Releasors") agree to release and fully discharge
DNI from all known and unknown claims that could be asserted by
First Releasors, past, present or future, which relate to the
Rev. 4/6/90
4/10/90
4/lV/90
2
project. Except as set forth in the following sentence, the
First Releasors expressly waive their rights under California
Civil Code Section 1542 which provides:
A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE
CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT
THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST
HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is expressly understood between
the parties to this agreement that nothing contained herein shall
preclude the First Releasors from any of the following: (a)
asserting a claim against DNI for guarantee and warranty under
the Contract Documents; (b) asserting a claim against DNI for any
"latent deficiency" in the construction of the project as that
term is defined in California Code of Civil Procedure ~ 337.15;
(c) asserting a claim against DNI for indemnity for any claim
against the City contemplated by Section 1.18 of the agreement or
within the scope of insurance coverage or sureties afforded the
City by or through DNI as a condition of the Contract Documents
3. Except as set forth below, DNI, its respective
officers, agents, predecessors, successors, assigns and related
entities ("Second Releasors") agree to release and fully
discharge the City from all known and unknown claims that could
be asserted by Second Releasors, past, present or future, which
relate to the project. Except as set forth below, the Second
Releasors expressly waive their rights under California Civil
Rev. 4/6/90
4/10/90
4/17/90
3
Code Section 1542 as set forth in paragraph 2 above.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is expressly understood between
the parties to this agreement that nothing contained herein shall
preclude the Second Releasors from asserting a claim against the
City for any claim against DNI asserted by Olympia Drywall Co.,
Pim Electric Inc., and Renfrow's Inc., ("Third Party Claimants"),
for losses, costs or damages arising out of the project caused by
delays to Third Party Claimants, changes in the work, extra work,
increased or decreased scope of work, rejection of claims or
extensions of time caused by the City, its agents or
representatives. Provided, however, this exception to this
general release shall not be construed 1) as an independent
source of liability of the City either to DNI or Third Party
Claimants, 2) a modification, waiver, or release of any
provisions of the Contract Documents, 3) a basis for DNI to
assert its own claim, independent of Third Party Claimants'
claims, for losses, costs or damages caused by delays, changes in
the work, extra work, increased or decreased scope of work,
rejection of claims, defense of claims by Third Party Claimants
or extensions of time caused by the City, its agents or
representatives, 4) an agreement for the benefit of any third
party including but not limited to Third Party Claimants. The
parties hereto agree that the provisions of this Mutual Release
Agreement shall not be construed to violate the provisions of
Section 7100 of the Public Contracts Code.
Rev. 4/6/90
4/10/90
4/ 7/90
4
4. Each of the parties hereto acknowledges that it may
hereafter discover facts different from or in addition to those
it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the claims,
demands, damages, debts, liabilities, actions or causes of action
herein released, and hereby agrees that these releases shall be
and remain in effect in all respects as complete, general and
mutual releases as to the matters to be released, notwithstanding
any such different and additional facts.
5. Each of the parties hereto represents and warrants that
it has not heretofore assigned or transferred or purported to
transfer or assign, to any other person, firm or corporation, any
claim, demand, damage, debt, liability, account, action or cause
of action herein released. Each party hereto agrees to indemnify
and hold harmless each other party hereto against any claim,
demand, damage, debt, liability, account, action, cause of
action, cost or expense including attorneys' fees actually paid
or incurred, arising out of or in connection with any such
transfer or assignment or purported or claimed transfer or
assignment.
6. This agreement is the result of a compromise and shall
never at any time for any purpose be considered as an admission
of liability or responsibility on the part of the parties herein
released, nor shall the payment of any sum of money in connection
Rev. 4/6/90
4/ o/9o
4/ ?/9o
with the execution of this agreement constitute or be construed
as an admission of any liability whatsoever of any of the parties
herein released, who continue to deny such liability and to
disclaim such responsibility. The parties further agree that the
negotiations that resulted in this agreement are subject to
California Evidence Code SS 1152 and 1154.
7. The undersigned hereby represent and warrant to each
other that they have the legal capacity and authority to enter
this agreement and to grant the releases set forth above, and
that the undersigned have the sole right and authority to execute
this agreement.
8. This agreement contains the entire agreement between
the parties hereto with respect to the matters set forth herein
and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
executors, administrators, personal representatives, heirs,
successors, and assigns of each party hereto. This agreement
shall not be modified except by way of a further writing executed
by all the parties hereto.,
9. 'The parties hereto have cooperated in the drafting and
preparation of this agreement and, therefore, this agreement
Rev. 4/6/90
4/10/90'
4/17/90
6
shall not be construed against any party. The parties expressly
waive the provisions of California Civil Code § 1654, providing
that ambiguities are to be construed against the drafting
parties.
10. This agreement supersedes all previous agreements
between the parties.
DATED: April , 1990
City of Dublin
By:
DATED: April , 1990
Dickman-Nourse Inc.
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
CITY ATTORNEY
AIKEN, KRAMER & CUMMINGS,
INCORPORATED
By:
Attorneys for City
By:
Attorneys for DNI
J: \~/PD\HNRI4\114\AGREE\D 1CKMANA.SRH
Rev. 4/6/90
4/10/90
4/17/90
7
EXHIBIT A
FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF DUBLIN
AND
DICKMAN NOURSE, INC.
Description:
Seven Pages. of Punch List Items as of April 17, 1990.
Each Item has a value. Total Value of items is $24,700.
Page 1 of 8
AMENDED LISTING BASED ON ARCHITECT REVIEW
Prior Update - February 27, 1990
EXTERIOR AND SITEWORK
Review Janaury 26, 1990
(Original Inspection November 1-3, 1989)
Not reviewed in detail for 2/23/90 Listing. Contractor should advise
if there are items remaining. Architect will re-review.
POLICE WING
$50 1. Door P101, main police public entry replace missing
caps on closers (11/1/89, pg.3, #2)
$250
3. Windows on Line 2 - 2 lights to right of line 19,
replace accidentally sandblasted glass. (11/1/89, pg.3, #4)
$800
5. Door Pl19 and P120 touch up paint where paint has come
off door.
(Roll-up Sally Port)
7. See #14 Police Facility
Clean out Sally Port.
a:4-17pnlts.doc.misc
April 3, 1990
Notes to Punch List
$7oo (1)
$1ooo (2)
(on list) (3)
$15oo (4)
Doors
A similar problem occurs with three doors. A
new door skin was adhered, however, the color match is
noticeably off. The value assigned is $200 for each
door. In addition, a value of $100 has been assigned
to Door C216.
Carpets
Carpet stains are noted on several places on the'Punch
List. A consolidated value has been placed on these
items. The stains are typically oil from machinery and
equipment or window leaks. The value included on the
Punch List is intended to represent the loss of value
in accepting carpets in this condition. In addition,
all unplaced carpet shall remain the property of the
City. Area of primary importance for any replacement
would be the Regional Meeting Room.
Intercom
The missing intercom was not noted on previous Punch
Lists as the holding cell area was one the final areas
to be completed.
Drain Type
A separate memo has been issued.
cost for all locations.
This consolidates the
Page 2 of 8
Updated April 17, 1990
Updated as of April 4, 1990)
(Updated as of March 29, 1990)
(Prior Update was February 23, 1990)
CITY HALL
First Floor
Punch List Items remaining as of January 26, 1990
(1)
$800
(2)
$50
$750
(2)
(2)
$500
18. Room C121- At door C126 the thumb turn is missing. (8/89 -
pg. 6, #1)
Door replaced - color/stain is lighter/more orange.
24. Room C126 At Mechoshade, Pocket 7 sections remain on order
to be replaced.
35. Room C143 - remove spots and stains from carpets.
pg.5, #3)
Grease type spot s/e corner of table & along window.
(10/20/89,
44. C148/C149/C150 - Repair or replace dented aluminum sill just
south of column G-16.4 (10/20/89, pg.7,#11) Council Chamber
Wai ring Area
50. Room C152 - Finish installation of sound system. (10/20/89,
pg.9, #4) Provide operable master volume control @ Clerk's desk
never worked. (Subcontractor claims work to be complete 4/2/90)
57. Room C153 - Clean spots and stains from carpet.
pg. 11, #2)
Attemptto clean: not 100% effective
(10/20/89,
60. Room C158 - Clean paint and construction spots and stains
from carpet. (10/20/89, pg. 13, #2) Caucus Room: attempt ~ entry
& 3 ft right side Marker Bd. not 100% effective
61. Room C159 -at entry mat, clean paint, stain, carpet glue,
grout and mastic from carpet treads and frame. If carpet treads
cannot be cleaned, replace them. Replace carpet treads that were
cut too short (six in the middle, one at door C102, three at door
C101) Adjust carpet threads for uniform space. Caulk edges to
pill gap where storefront is exposed. (10/20/89, pg.13, #4)
Vestibule to P.D. from City Hall
( 1 ) See Note ( 1 )
(2) See Note (2)
Updated April 17, 1990
Updated April 4, 1990
Updated March 29, 1990
City Hall Second Floor
Punch List Items
Remaining as of 01/26/90
GENERAL NOTE: The following doors were worked on, however, the color does not match
the doors elsewhere in the facility.
(1)
8. Room C211 - (Const. Mgr Office) - Replace door C216 because of
imperfections on interior side. (07/25/89 pg 6, #1) Status: New door
hangs up at top.
(1)
11. Room C215 - (City Mgr Conf Rm) - At door C219 replace door (due to
severe scratch on interior side). (07/25/89 pg 7, #1) Door skin
replaced - please confirm stain color. Color lighter - more orange
(1)
12. Room C216 - (Mayor's Office) Replace door C221 due to chip and
scratch on interior. (07/25/89 pg 7, #1) See above
Updated April 17, 1990
Updated March 29, 1990
Prior Update as of February 23, 1990
Police Facility
First Floor
Punch List Items
Remaining as January 26, 1990
(2)
3. Rooms 101 & 102 - Remove dirt, stain and burns from carpet.
(10/13/89 pg 3-#14). Continues to come up after cleaning
(2)
20. RoomiP138 - Corridor, clean spot from carpet. (10/13/89 pg 10-#2)
(See General Notes on Carpets attempted to clean did not)
(2)
28. Room P154 - Clean spots from carpet. (10/13/89 pg 13-#1)
$300(3)
New Item: It has been noted that wire was pulled at the holding cell
booking counter, however, the intercorn was never installed.
Updated March 29, 1990
Supplemental Punch List
Originally Dated February 23, 1990
$5,000
5. Satisfactory completion of landscape maintenance period (see
comments on landscape punchlist).
$1,500
6. Correction of ponding problem:
b) South of arcade at building entrance
A:4-17pnlt.DOC
Page 4 of 8
.... : .~ '.i! ' '.';"-.'::~7~'" ~:'! ii · '
DUBLIN CIVIC CENTER
PUNCH LIST: VERTICAL LOUVRE BLINDS
(FEBRUARY 2:3, 1990)
TIlls punch list upclates progress by DIckman-Nourse, Inc. and/or their
subcontractors on Items contained on a punch list dated October 6, 1989.
Room numbers are as shown on the original contract drawings and tt~e
punci~ list.
TIle follow-up Inspection was limited In the Police
restricted access to certain rooms. Corrections for
repeated In tl~eir entirety on this list.
Room C II 7 (Expansion Area)
-Two sections continue to drag on the sill.
left & Section on far right)
-Install missing blades.
Facill ty due to
those rooms are
(2nd section from
Room C 134 (Planning Director)
-Dlinds bind at the right side, adjust track.
-Cut off screws
Room C232 (FInance Technician)
-Toucl~ up repair to off set Joint in curtain'pocket
I-loom C234 (FInance Director)
-Right side drags when curtains are open
UPDA TED A5 Of MARCH 2, I9902
Room P215 (Special Investigations)
-AdJ us t to keep b l 1 nds from dragg l ng (RIGHTS/DE WHEN OPEN)
-Relocate bt Inds In pocket to eliminate dragging
~age '5 of::"8~
LANDSCAPE PUNCH LIST
Taken from David Gates & Associates
Letter dated March 7, 1990
Update as of March 30, 1990
Updated April 17, 1990
Landscaping Subject to Final Review
At Conclusion of Maintenance Period
HARDSCAPE
The following hardscape items have yet to be corrected or completed.
Courtyard
(4) 1.
A green plastic drain grate was substituted for the brass Zurn
grate which was specified. The plastic grates are not durable
under traffic, there are several broken on the site already.
Grate should be replaced with that specified without detriment. to
the surrounding concrete paving. We would like to see the
procedure for this for approval before it is done.
Entry Plaza
(4) 7. The wrong drain type has been installed in all cases in the
planting areas in the entry plaza and along Dublin Boulevard
where Santa Rosa drains were called for. These are concrete
drain boxes with iron grates 12" square. The substitution was a
6" diameter plastic grate with no drain box. As was noted in
October, this is not acceptable. In some cases, the grates are
already broken. We would like these replaced as specified.
$500 8.
The large catch basin D.I. #11 appears to have been set too low
by 3"-4". It should be raised.
Dublin Boulevard Area
$250 9. There is a low spot in the sidewalk parallel to Dublin Boulevard
at the triangle where water collects on the paving and adjacent
planting.i
$300 11.
All areas impacted bythe fountain repair should be regraded to
eliminate humps, depressions and wheel marks. The mulch which
was washed from fountain berm should be replaced in planting area
by qualified landscape personnel. Berm at fountain requires
regrading. All disturbed lawn areas shall be reseeded.
Parkinq Area
$50 4. Four Fraxinus specified have been planted between the Police
parking lots; (Fill in hole at the north end.)
Courtyard
$50 7.
Plant Chrysanthemum which was not planted in planter between the
doors. Remove Felicia which was substituted.
Front Plaza
$750 9. Almost entire berm was damaged presumably during fountain
malfunction. Must be re-fine graded. Virtually all Agapanthus
are in poor condition and require replacement.
Other Site Areas
$50 10. There is a layer of rocks in the lawn adjacent to the sidewalk at
the corner of Civic Plaza and Dublin Boulevard. Please remove.
(4) See Note 4
Page 6 of 8
$50 11.
Repair of existing landscape:
Infill Gazania in median on Civic Plaza to match existing.
Remove sand from sandblast before planting.
The following additional items need action:
$8,000
13. All lawn.areas are in poor condition and in need of weed
control.
$300 14.
Where Feijoa was removed at west driveway, remove header and
mulch, convert to lawn irrigation and seed.
Parkinq Area
$200 15. Truck access Grass Cell at canal needs to be finished with
headerboard, filled, and seeded with lawn.
PSR:slh
a:4-171and.doc.misc
Page 7 of 8
· . .FP-VBI~B
,~/Rice
Ray Arthur
Amy [lallaher
FIELD REPORT
4 Union Bcluara,
Union Oily, CA 945E17
Phone 415/471-9244
Fax 415/471-37Lit1
001
FIELD REPORT NO.:
CONTRACT= _j,cEJ_ga tLo. n
INSTALLATION STATUS=
DATE:
12-13-89
INFDRMA'FION OR ACTION REQUIRED= /:~'~' '=, .:
, Install remote control' valve ID tags at each remote control valve
per note t19,
All quick couRltng valves must be Installed with drain rock and be
sial<eel wit angle Iron as detailed. Reinforcing bar will not
I~e accepted.
All remo'te control valves Installations In courtyard area need to have
rlraln rock lnstal led as detal'Ied,
'l'lm rnllnwlng valves do not have drain rock lnstalled~ -Ral3c valves-.
..-eu.t--e-I: nlL~d and InsLaH. drain rock allowing clearance under valve
hod I es as de La 11
A-7 'tl~rough A-11, A-16 through A-18, B-27, B-28, C-2 tl3rough C-6,
F-14, C-16, C-30 ticrough C-52,
Alelost all remote'control valves that DO have drain rock installed
are hurled In the rock up to the ad3'~sttng steels, Raise valves
I:o alloH clearance under valve bodies as detailed, Valves must
ilave plenty of room for servicing,
Valve A-'I~: No spare HIre was Installed to this valve location,
5;pl icP Into spare wire a~ nearest 1ocatlon and Install t:o
w~l ve box.
',/~:~lvas B-l, B-2. 8-:~. C'-9: ~ C-34~ Provide 2q' excess coiled loop ~1:
u,.,:l~ ~ire a~ eacl~ remote control valve location.
liEPont uv: I'~ay Arthur
<:OP~E.S',,,: t. lor l Hatsushl, Morl HatsLishl g Associates
l.'llf:llelle Scholz, David Gates g Associatess
PLANNINF:; · DESIGN
s/so/ o -
of' sl?ho
· REHABILITATION · MANAGEMEN'F
Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT