Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 012-03 Fire Facility Fee Amen RESOLUTION NO. 12 - 03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ******* AMENDING THE FIRE FACILITY FEE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DUBLIN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.78 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging a Public Facilities Fee ("Fee") to pay for municipally owned public facilities within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Dublin; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("E Dublin GP A") and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ("SP") were adopted by the City in 1993; and WHEREAS, the SP was amended in October 1996 by Resolution No. 124-96; and WHEREAS, the E Dublin GPA outlines future land uses for approximately 4176 acres within the City's eastern sphere of influence including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square feet of commercial, office, and industrial development; and WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies and action programs for approximately 3313 acres within the E Dublin GP A area nearest to the City; and WHEREAS, the E Dublin GPA and SP areas ("Eastern Dublin") are shown on the Land Use Map contained in the GPA and exclude the area shown on the Land Use Map as "Future Study Areal Agriculture" (Exhibit A attached hereto); and WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report ("E Dublin EIR") was prepared for the E Dublin GPA and SP (SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993 by Resolution No. 51-93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994 ("Addenda") have been prepared and considered by the Council; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan anticipates new development in several areas, including Eastern Dublin and Western Dublin, as well as infill development; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan has been amended by, among others, the Schaefer Ranch General Plan Amendment (adopted by the City in July 1996 by Resolution No. 77-96); and Trumark Homes General Plan Amendment (adopted by the City in May 1996 by Resolution No. 49-96); and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report ("Schaefer EIR") was prepared for the Schaefer Ranch General Plan Amendment (SCH No. 95033070) and certified by the Council on July 9, 1996 by Resolution No. 76-96; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 1989 the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority approved a "Fire Station Location Study" ("Station Location Study") prepared by Hughes-Heiss; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 1999, in Resolution No. 206-99 the City Council approved a "Fire Station Prototype Study" ("Station Prototype Study") prepared by Dommer Associates; and WHEREAS, the City's Building Code, as adopted in Dublin Municipal Code section 7.32.260 ("Building Code") requires a five-minute fire response time; and WHEREAS, a goal of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (8.3.1) is to ensure that fire protection services in Eastern Dublin are consistent with standards maintained in the rest of the City, including a five-minute response time; and WHEREAS, the Station Location Study, Station Prototype Study, Building Code, SP, E Dublin ErR and Addenda, and Schaefer ErR describe the municipal public facilities necessary to provide adequate fire services in the City, including construction of two new fire stations; and WHEREAS, the General Plan, the Station Location Study, Station Prototype Study, Building Code, SP, E Dublin GP A, E Dublin EIR and Addenda, and Schaefer EIR describe the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities in the City of Dublin through the year 2025 and contain an analysis of the need for new municipal public facilities required by future development within the City of Dublin, including two new fire stations and related necessary equipment; and WHEREAS, a detailed comprehensive study of the impacts of contemplated future development on existing fire-related public facilities in the City of Dublin through the year 2025, along with an analysis of the need for new fire-related public facilities and improvements required by future developments, was prepared by Hausrath Economics Group, dated March 1997 entitled "Dublin Fire Facilities Financing Study"; and WHEREAS, MuniFinancial recently prepared a study, entitled "Fire Facilities Impact Fee Update," dated January 17, 2003, which updated the Hausrath Study and the 2000 Fire Facilities Impact Fee Update prepared by MuniFinancial (Exhibit B attached hereto, "MuniFinancial Study"); and WHEREAS the MuniFinancial Study was based on the General Plan (as amended to include not only Eastern Dublin but all other general plan amendments to date, including the Schaefer Ranch and Trumark Homes projects, hereafter the "General Plan"); and WHEREAS, the MuniFinancial Study sets forth the relationship among contemplated future development, the needed facilities, and the estimated costs of those improvements; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing at which this resolution was adopted, notice of the time and place of the hearing was mailed to eligible interested parties who filed written requests with the City for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased fees or service charges; and WHEREAS, the MuniFinancial Study was available for public inspection and review for ten (10) days prior to the public hearing held on the date hereof; and FINDINGS WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. The purpose of the Fire Facilities Fee (hereafter "Fee") is to finance municipal public facilities to reduce the impacts caused by future developments in the City of Dublin. Such facilities, which are specifically described in the MuniFinancial Study, include the following: land acquisition and construction of two new fire stations, rolling stock and equipment for two new stations, other associated 2 vehicles and equipment, administrative space, and improvements to existing facilities. The public facilities described in the study are hereinafter referred to as the "Facilities." B. The Fee collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the Facilities. C. After considering the MuniFinancial Study, the testimony received at this noticed public hearing, the Agenda statements, the General Plan, the SP, the Station Location Study, the Station Prototype Study, the Building Code, the E Dublin EIR and Addenda, the Schaefer EIR, and all correspondence received (hereafter "Record"), the Council approves and adopts said MuniFinancial Study and incorporates such herein; the Council further finds that the future development in the City of Dublin will generate the need for the Facilities, and that the Facilities are consistent with the City's General Plan, the Station Location Study, and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. D. The adoption of the Fee as it relates to development within Eastern Dublin is within the scope of the E Dublin EIR and Addenda. The Facilities were identified in the EIR as necessary to accommodate development in Eastern Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the Facilities, were adequately analyzed at a Program level in the E Dublin EIR. Since the certification of the E Dublin EIR there have been no substantial changes in the projections of future development as identified in the E Dublin EIR, no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances, and no other new information of substantial importance so as to require important revisions in the E Dublin EIR's analysis of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA of the Facilities will be required before any such Facilities are approved. It is not feasible to provide project specific environmental review of the Facilities at this stage, as they will be implemented over a 30-year period and specific details as to their timing, construction, and precise location are not presently known. E. The adoption of the Fee as it relates to development within the area covered by the Schaefer Project ("Schaefer Ranch Annexation Area") is within the scope of the Schaefer EIR. The Facilities were all identified in the Schaefer EIR as necessary to accommodate development in Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the Facilities, were adequately analyzed at a Project level in the Schaefer EIR. Since the certification of the Schaefer EIR there have been no substantial changes in the projections of future development as identified in the Schaefer EIR, no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances, and no other new information of substantial importance so as to require important revisions in the Schaefer EIR's analysis of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA of the Facilities will be required before any such Facilities are approved. It is not feasible to provide project specific environmental review of the Facilities at this stage, as they will be implemented over a 30-year period and specific details as to their timing, construction and precise location are not presently known. F. The adoption of the Fee as it relates to development within the City of Dublin (excluding Eastern Dublin and the Schaefer Annexation Area) is to obtain funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within the existing service areas; that the City currently provides fire protection and suppression services through a contractual relationship with the Alameda County Fire Department, which operates from three fire stations, two of which are located within the City limits (including the temporary Santa Rita station); that the Fee will be used to maintain current service levels; and that no existing deficiencies have been found to exist. As such, the Fee as it relates to development within the City (excluding Eastern Dublin and the Schaefer Ranch Annexation Area) is not a "project" within the meaning ofCEQA (Public Resources Code ~ 21080(b)(8)(D)). G. In adopting the Fee, the Council is exercising its powers under Article XI, S 7 of the California Constitution, Chapter 7.78 of the Dublin Municipal Code, and Chapter 5 of Division 1 of the 3 Government Code, commencing with section 66000 (and section 66018, in particular) collectively and separately. H. The Record establishes: 1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Facilities and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged in that new development in the City of Dublin (hereafter to include Eastern Dublin and the Schaefer Ranch Annexation Area)-both residential and non-residential-will generate persons who live, work, and/or shop in Dublin and who generate or contribute to the need for the Facilities; and 2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the Fee's use (to pay for the construction of the Facilities) and the type of development for which the Fee is charged in that all development in the City of Dublin-both residential and non-residential-generates or contributes to the need for the Facilities; and 3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fee and the cost of the Facilities or portion thereof attributable to development in the City of Dublin in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of residents or employees generated by specific types of land uses, the total amount it will cost to construct the Facilities, and the percentage by which development within the City of Dublin contributes to the need for the Facilities; and 4. That the cost estimates set forth in the MuniFinancial Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Facilities, and the Fees expected to be generated by future development will not exceed the projected costs of constructing the Facilities; and 5. The method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development bears a fair and reasonable relationship to each development's burden on, and benefit from, the Facilities to be funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of residents or employees each particular development will generate. I. The Study is a detailed analysis of how public services will be affected by development in the City of Dublin, and the public facilities required to accommodate that development. ADOPTION OF FEE NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, 1. Defmitions. a. "Commercial" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on land having a General Plan land use or zoning designation for facilities for the purchase and sale of commodities and services and the sales, servicing, installation, and repair of such commodities and services and other space uses incidental to these activities. Commercial land uses include but are not limited to: apparel and clothing stores; auto dealers and malls; auto accessories stores; banks and savings and loans; beauty salons; book stores; discount stores and centers; dry cleaners; drug stores; eating and drinking establishments; furniture stores and outlets; general merchandise stores; hardware stores; home furnishings and improvement centers; hotel/motels; laundromats; liquor stores; restaurants; service stations; shopping centers; supermarkets; and theaters. 4 b. "Developed" and "development" shall mean the construction or alteration of or addition to, other than by the City, any building or structure within the City of Dublin. c. "Facilities" shall include those municipal public facilities as are described in the MuniFinancial Study and as described in the Fire Station Location Report, Station Prototype Report, SP, E Dublin EIR and Addenda. "Facilities" shall also include comparable alternative facilities should later changes in projections of development in the region necessitate construction of such alternative facilities; provided that the City Council later determines (1) that there is a reasonable relationship between development within the City of Dublin and the need for the alternative facilities (2) that the alternative facilities are comparable to the facilities in the Study, and (3) that the revenue from the Fee will be used only to pay new development's fair and proportionate share of the alternative facilities. d. "Industrial" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on land having a General Plan land use or zoning designation for the manufacture, production, assembly, and processing of consumer goods and other space uses incidental to these activities. Industrial land uses include but are not limited to: assembly; concrete and asphalt batching plants; contractor's storage yards; fabrication; lumber yard; manufacturing; outdoor stockyards and service yards; printing; processing; warehouse and distribution; and wholesale and heavy commercial uses. e. "Mixed Development" shall mean a development that includes more than one of the types of development defined in this Section 1. Mixed developments may combine residential types of development (Single Family and Multiple Family), non-residential types of development (Commercial, Industrial, and Office), or a combination of residential and non-residential types of development. f. "Multiple Family" shall mean any dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code, as adopted by the City, which is constructed on property designated in the General Plan or SP for 6.1 or more units per acre. g. "Office" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on land having a General Plan land use or zoning designation for general business offices, medical and professional offices, administrative or headquarters offices for large wholesaling or manufacturing operations, and research and development and other space uses incidental to these activities. Office land uses include but are not limited to: administrative headquarters; business park; finance offices; insurance offices; legal offices; medical and health services offices; offices and office buildings; professional and administrative offices; professional associations; real estate offices; research and development and travel agencies. h. "~ingle Family" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC), as adopted by the City of Dublin, which is constructed or to be constructed on property designated in the General Plan or SP for 6 or fewer units per acre. 2. Fire Facilities Fee rmposed. a. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66000 et seq., ("Mitigation Fee Act") a Fire Facilities Fee shall be imposed and paid at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and be administered as prescribed in this Resolution on each Single Family and Multiple Family 5 residential unit developed within the City of Dublin, including each portion of such residential development within mixed development. b. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66000 et seq., ("Mitigation Fee Act") a Fire Facilities Fee shall be imposed and paid at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and be administered as prescribed in this Resolution on each non-residential building or structure, including commercial, industrial, and office buildings and structures, developed within the City of Dublin, including each portion of such non-residential development within mixed development. c. Any use of land which is not included in the definition of "Commercial," Industrial," or "Office" shall be allocated by the Community Development Director to one of the three categories, maintaining as much consistency as possible with the definitions of such terms. 3. Time for Imposing Fee for Residential Subdivisions. In accordance with Government Code Section 65961, the Fee for Single Family and Multiple Family subdivision development for which tentative or parcel maps are required pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Sections 66410 et seq.) shall be imposed at the time of approval of the conditions that apply to the tentative or parcel map for such residential subdivision development, as applicable. Payment of the Fee shall be deemed to be a condition of all such tentative or parcel maps. Notwithstanding this Section 3, the time for payment of the Fee for all development, including Single Family and Multiple Family subdivisions, shall be as specified in Section 4, below. 4. Time for Fee Payment. a. In accordance with Government Code Section 66007, a Fee shall be charged and paid for each Single Family and Multiple Family residential development upon the date of final inspection or issuance of the certificate of occupancy for such residential development, which ever is earlier; however, if the Fee is to reimburse the City for expenditures previously made, or if the City determines that the Fee will be collected for Facilities for which an account has been established and funds appropriated and for which the City has adopted a proposed construction schedule prior to issuance of the building permit for such residential development, then the Fee shall be charged and paid upon issuance of the building permit for such residential development. b. A Fee shall be charged and paid for each non-residential development, including commercial, industrial, and office developments, upon issuance of the building permit for such non-residential development. c. A Fee shall be charged and paid for each mixed development upon the times specified in this Section 4 that apply to such mixed development. For example, if a mixed development includes residential development and non-residential development, and the Fee is to reimburse the City for expenditures previously made, or the City has made the required determination to permit requiring payment of the Fee upon issuance of the building permit, the Fee as applicable to the entire mixed development shall be paid upon issuance of the building permit for the mixed development. If a mixed development includes residential and non- residential development, and the Fee is not to reimburse the City for expenditures previously made or the City has not made the required determination to permit requiring payment of the Fee upon issuance of the building permit, the Fee as to the residential portion of the mixed development shall be paid upon the earlier of the date of final inspection or issuance of the certificate of 6 occupancy for such residential portion, and the Fee as to the non-residential portion of the mixed development shall be paid upon issuance of the building permit for such non-residential portion. 5. Amount of Fee. a. The amount of the Fee for residential and non-residential development shall be as set forth on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein. b. applicable: The amount of the Fee for mixed development shall be the sum of the following, as i. The applicable amount per-unit pursuant to Section 5(a), above, for each Single Family and Multiple Family development within a mixed development. ii. The applicable amount per 1,000 sq. ft. pursuant to Section 5(a), above, for each commercial, office, or industrial development or portion of such development within a Mixed Development. 6. Exemptions From Fee. a. The Fee shall not be imposed on any of the following: (1) Any alteration or addition to a residential structure, except to the extent that a residential unit is added to a single family residential unit or another unit is added to an existing multiple-family residential unit; (2) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished, if the building permit for reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished. This subsection shall not apply if the replacement or reconstruction increases the square footage of the structure by 50 percent or more. (3) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished, if the building permit for reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished, there is no change in the land use designation of the property, and the square footage of the replacement building does not exceed the square footage of the building that was destroyed or demolished. (4) Any non-residential building or structure constructed on property on which a building or structure was demolished for which a development impact fee to fund fire facilities has been paid to the City within the prior ten year period. The exemption provided in this subsection shall be in the amount of the previously paid fee only, and the applicant shall pay any additional amount based on the then-current Fee. (5) Any addition to an existing non-residential structure of 500 square feet or less. b. The City Council, in its discretion, may waive the applicability of the Fee to certain development constructed or to be constructed by a public entity on land having an appropriate General Plan land use designation upon findings of the City Council that such 7 a waiver is in the interest of the public health, safety, and/or welfare, for reasons specified in the fmdings. Such reasons may include, but are not limited to, that the Fee, as it would apply to such development by a public entity, will be sufficiently recovered in whole or in part from residential development the residents of which may constitute the primary users of the public entity development. 7. Use of Fee Revenues. a. The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall be placed in the Capital Project Fund. Separate and special accounts within the Capital Project Fund shall be used to account for such revenues, along with any interest earnings on each account. The revenues (and interest) shall be used for the following purposes: (1) To pay for design, engineering, right-of-way or land acquisition and construction and/or acquisition of the Facilities and reasonable costs of outside consultant studies related thereto; (2) To reimburse the City for the Facilities constructed by the City with funds from other sources including funds from other public entities, unless the City funds were obtained from grants or gifts intended by the grantor to be used for the Facilities. (3) To reimburse developers who have designed and constructed Facilities which are oversized with supplemental size, length, or capacity; and (4) To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing administration of the Fee program. b. Fees in these accounts shall be expended only for the Facilities and only for the purpose for which the Fee was collected. 8. Standards. The standards upon which the needs for the Facilities are based are the standards of the City of Dublin, including the standards contained in the General Plan, the Station Location Study, Station Prototype Study, the SP, E Dublin EIR and Addenda and the Schaefer EIR. 9. Existing Deficiencies. There are no existing deficiencies. 10. Periodic Review. a. During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare a report for the City Council, pursuant to Government Code section 66006, identifying the balance of Fees in each account. b. Pursuant to Government Code section 66002, the City Council shall also review, as part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the approximate location, size, time of availability and estimates of cost for all Facilities to be financed with the Fee. The estimated costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council shall 8 make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the purpose for which it is charged. 11. Subsequent Analysis of the Fee. The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the Council in reliance on the Record identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council shall review the Fee to determine that the amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of 'development within the City of Dublin and within areas included in the City's General Plan. The City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the findings and conclusions of further studies and any standards in the SP and General Plan, as well as increases due to inflation and increased construction costs. 12. Fee Adjustments. The purpose of this Section 12 is to provide for annual adjustments of the Fee for inflation, beginning July 1,2003 and each July thereafter. The Fee shall be adjusted based on the change in construction costs, land acquisition costs, and equipment costs using the percentage increase/decrease in the three indicators describe in subsections (a), (b), and (c) below. Those adjustments shall be applied to the Fee rate based on the relative allocation among the cost estimate for construction of improvements, acquisition of land, and purchase of equipment included in the MuniFinancial Study. Based on the information contained in Table 7 of the MuniFinancial Study, 85% of the cost estimate is attributable to construction, 5% to land acquisition, and 10% to acquisition of apparatus. Accordingly, the construction cost indicator shall be weighted 85%, the land cost indicator 5%, and the apparatus acquisition indicator 10%. a. Construction Cost. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust the cost of construction of the Facilities, as shown in Table 7 in the MuniFinancial Study, increasing/decreasing such construction cost by the annual percentage increase/decrease reached by comparing the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (20-city average) for the prior March or April over the same Construction Cost Index for the same month for the prior year. The City Manager may round the adjusted Facilities construction cost to whole dollars. b. Land Acquisition Cost. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust the cost of acquiring real property interests for the Facilities, as shown on Table 7 in the MuniFinancial Study, by calculating the percentage change in land cost per acre within the City, based on a comparison of the most recent appraisal (prepared for the City for the purpose of adjusting the Fee) and the immediately preceding appraisal (prepared for the City for the purpose of adjusting. the Fee and using the same methodology). The City Manager may round the adjusted Facilities land acquisition cost to whole dollars. c. Facilities Acquisition Cost. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust the cost of acquiring (through purchase or otherwise) the vehicles, equipment, and furnishings, as shown on Table 7 in the MuniFinancial Study, by applying the then current Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers for the San Francisco/Oakland bay area for the months of March or April. The City Manager may round the adjusted Facilities acquisition cost to whole dollars. 9 d. Total Annual Fee Adjustment. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust the Fee by applying the total annual Fee adjustment for that year to the prior year's Fee. The total annual Fee adjustment shall be reached by apportioning the adjustment in construction cost, land acquisition cost and facilities acquisition cost calculated according to this Section 12 according to the percentage each cost comprises of the whole Fee. 13. Administrative Guidelines. The Council may, by resolution, adopt administrative guidelines to provide procedures for calculation, credit, reimbursement, or deferred payment and other administrative aspects of the Fee. Such guidelines may include procedures for construction of designated Facilities by developers. 14. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately. The Fee provided in Section 2 of this resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the resolution. 15. Severability. Each component of the Fee and all portions of this resolution are severable. Should any individual component of the Fee or other provision of this resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining component or provisions shall be and continue to be fully effective, and the Fee shall be fully effective except as to that component that has been judged to be invalid. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers McCormick, Oravetz, Sbranti and Zika and Mayor Lockhart NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I ..... , '- ". X. '\ '/.... ."[~' , " /-,,' :/'>;.(. :~'__.,-i . Ii /' 5 ("' "",>,,,,-:,,/ l -,if /' K,'-'" A<VJ ,/:> li~A ; \ f \"<"-/I,\j(...J"1(.__"I.>it;~:~~/L,/1 MAYOR ATTEST:~LcIz Y CL RK K2/G/2-4-03/reso-firefee.doc (Item 6.3) J:\ WPD\MNRSW\114\OO 1\2000\Reso\firefees_ll 0 l.doc , i I J V 10 DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP * <~;l;~ ,;? 't,,'~ '~ ;t;)-~:: ~ -~." ..r:.....-... .I"~ fj {[",~~l "~, (Figure 1-1a) as amended through November 'torr'. \".~>l 5,2002 NORTH 11 iIDO ICH ftoN,r:ift i::;;:::;;..~ Q <L :l; l!: '" ~ 'i!/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! .. ~ i :t ~ ,yn- Boundary Aru BoUndlllry Amendments: City ColRlCil Nov. 5, 2002 02-045 205-02 Nov. 5. 2002 Boundary 'We-stern Exiend ed Planning Planning Area ....... Influence Urban Urnl Eastern Extended Lmo :Prime ry Plannj n of Limt . _ _ _ _ _ Sphere Clty Approved By: Date: PA#: Reso #: Reso date Lines Note Future Residential ~ Rural R-esJdenUeJ/Agricullure (1,0 unit per 100 00"'.) ...id fi:.~le _ R~d ~n~~ per e.cr~) ~ low Den:!lJty Slnill:1e- famllY' Reslde-n U~l {o. 6 - :). a unitS- per acre) - low Denllity Rerrid-e l'l Ul!l Residilmtial {C.O - 6.0 units ~r- acre) ~~0~~:'~1 ~rwle hmll)' ResidenUal ;-'--'-~--,:'" D. - 8.0 unJts per acre) ~~ Wed iwn Oensity I<<!sid ImUal (B.t - 14.0 UlUts per acre) _ M-d1um-H1!h Dons1ty Re'ld:f'U.1 1.04.1 - :G5. un.i:u:per acre _ I!~h Clans'tif ReoldentJ.1 ,2 .0 + un :!I per I!-cre) --.J ~~~~~r Park/Medium I}.ensily A Exhibit Office CommerciaVI ndustrial _ Gen~T&1 CommoeJ"C'ial :. Reudl/OffiC'e ~ Nei,ghbotbood C-ommerc-il!ll _ RelaU!Omce ill: .AutomoUve ---.I Campus Office :~*~ lndustdal ParK _ Bnsjnels Parlt:/lndustrJel _Business :Parl1:/1ndustrie.l: Ol;ltdoor SlCIrag-e _ Indull'lriaJ Park/Campus Office- ~ il.d/HJ~h Re,idential ~ &: Relu. Office _ General Commucie.l/Ce.mpul _ Mixed Use MILE Publi clSemi -P ublicl Open Space _ PubHc:-/Semi-PublJc FaeiUty [!I Elementary School ~ Junior Hlah School BlI High Soh 001 --.J Pi!lIrlcl!Pubilc Re-creation B CRy Park B Commwtity Park HD. Neigh 'borhooCl Park .. Open Space :__,: _ -<:. -::-_, Str~am Corridor __ hbHc ~nd:l .---.I NeJihborhood Square C0IVTRA COSTA COu/.try ALA"'EDA:OU'frY Extended Planning Area Notes: * "The C-eneral Plan umd Use W-ap- 'Was cree-toed by combining into Cone ma:p:: ,TIle origJnllll Land UlIe and C.i.n:!ula tion Map for the Primary PlanniIII Arelll (Jl'lgure 1-1 in the 1985 General Plan}, ,The Ell stl:rn. Ex lended Plannlng Arc-a J...m nd Use ~1!I p (Figure- '28 of lhe E"'Z!I'toe-m Dublin G-eneral Plan Amendment): and ~ All G~nera! Plan Amendme:n.ls apprDved b-y City Co-une.i.l b~t w~-en '\.he d-n. t ~ of the origine;l General Plan oBI dopUcn on Febnlllry U, J 985 I!IIDd :N ovem bel' 5, 2002. ** Fro:pe:rlles no-te--d wI t.b clua t asterlskll .....Ill convert tel futun- study lll'ea/i!lllrk'ultuTe ..mere determin-ed incClnsist~nl with Lbe Livermore Airport Planning Area. *** CenlraJ Park....ay Is prol'01Ied. to -c-onneet with 'D1.lblin Boulevard within the Clty 1.J..mlts In 11le future. However, the exact alignment "JIl be determIned folio-wing rurtiler alignment stud i-es. Th-e Genera I PJan l.and Use },{a p ll'll.S approved and adopted by City COllnoe!l on November 5. :aOO:2'. Gen-e-r-e.l Plan Land. Use Nap- should be use-d In c-om bina tlon .....itb the- GeneraJ Pian and ap.plicable SpeejJ'je Plens that contain poHcJe51 and de ve lopml!'nt eta ndards for -SIp'e-cItI~ pJanning a re1!ll5l. 'ifhile the Generel Plan Land Use Yap -shows e:dstlr.Ji d-e-n-Iopment and 16 fOUt. only the land Ulte de:lliDl!;tions for the land an whicn :such d~velopmenl exists &n!' pII ri. 01 the Genera! P Jan. Si!IIinb '" l ~~ ~ '* .~ *' $' Western Churches, Parks, Public Schools and Ci Facilities 1. Valley eh rjl!lUan Center 2. John Knox ?reabyterll!!ln Churcb 3. Nielsen E.lil!'mentary 5e hool 4. St. RayrnQDd'9 Ca.tholic Church '5.. St. Philip's Lulheran Church 6. ltUM'l!lY E.I~menltlry St:hool 7. Dublin Hlemenlary &:hool 8. Lutheran CbuJ"I::!b 0' the Re'5lurrection 9. BART Pa.rkinl!l: 10. Dublin Ci'Vic Center ElM PoJlce Senj:e-el' 11. VeJley Hill:h Seboal ana Staaer Communlty Gym 12. "Wells- Mid cUe SehaoJ 13.. PeJ"kny Bap.tist Ch-urc-n 14. Fredericksen Elementary School 15. DubJln High SchooJ :is. Cburch 01 JesWl Chrjst o! the LaLter Do}' n. Mamo Creek Park 1 B. DoUllfh-e-rl.y Hills Open Space 19, -Stapeaach Park 20. Dublin Spcn-lJo Ground.s 21. Site of the rormer Cronin Park :2:2'. Oub!ln CommunJty Swim Center 23. Kolb Park 2-4. ShlllJ1non Park and Community C'cnte-' 25. Dola n Park 2.8. Ma:pe Memorial PEll'k 2'7. DubUn HeT'lLa~ Center 28. EmeraJd Glen Park 29. Ted fairfIeld Pad: 30. Dub!iD Libra ry {dosing Win t.er, 2oo3} 3:], Ilublln L1bn,., (opening WInter, 200~) :):2, DubUn Sen..ior Center 33. D1.lbl.ln Fire Sbticn HD.. ~6i 34. OtIblhl Fire- Sl.alion No.. 17 35. Dublin Fire StostiOt1 No. IS 36. DouSbi!"rty Elementary Sc-.hool CITY OF DUBLIN FIRE FACiliTIES IMPACT FEE UPDATE JANUARY 17, 2003 MuniFinancial Oakland Office 1736 Franklin Street Suite 450 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 832,-0899 Fax. (510) 832.-0898 Temecula, CA Industry, CA Jacksonville, FL Lancaster, CA Oakland, CA www.muni.com Exhibit B Phoenix, AZ San Diego, CA Seattle, WA Washington, DC ............-........-.....-.-............-............- .....................-...............-..-............- ...................-.....-....... .....-.....-..-....-..............-..-............ ...................-.-.-........-..-............-.-.........-...-...-.........-.-......-............-.....-..-.-........ ... TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.............................................................................................. ...2 Fire Facilities Service Population................................................................2 Existing and Planned Fire Facilities............................................................3 Fire Facilities Standards............................................................................. 7 Fire Facilities to Accommodate New Development ....................................8 Alternative Funding Sources......................................................................9 Fee Schedule.............................................................................................9 Program Implementation.......................................................................... 1 0 Page i MuniFinancial CitY of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee Introduction ii H '" j ;'11 ' , , MuniFinancial was retained by the City of Dublin to complete an update of the City's fire facilities impact fee. This report is an update of Fire Facilities Impact Fee, completed by MuniFinancial in October 2000 and adopted by the City Council. The City of Dublin contracts with the Alameda County Fire Department for fire services. The City is responsible for providing all necessary capital facilities. The City currently imposes an impact fee of $646 per single-family dwelling unit, $404 per multi-family dwelling unit, $0.095 per square foot for commercial, $0.185 per square foot for office, and $0.081 per square foot for industrial. Development impact fees should be regularly updated to ensure sufficient funding of facilities to serve growth. Annual updates typically adjust fees for capital project cost inflation. More extensive updates incorporate new data on growth projections as well. This report updates the fee for both of these types of assumptions, and recalculates the facility standard to ensure new development continues to only pay its fair share of total system costs. The cost of new facilities attributable to new development includes financing costs associated with a general fund loan to be repaid by impact fee revenue. Fire Facil~ties Service Po ulation ' I ' The City serves both homes and businesses in its service area. Need for the City's services and associated facilities is measured by its service population, or the number of residents and workers within its service area. Service population reasonably represents the need for fire facilities because people requesting medical assistance generate most calls for service, rather than structure fires requiring suppression. Hence, the demand for fire service is strongly correlated with the distribution of residents and workers within the service area. Table 1 shows the estimated service population for 2002 and 2025. In calculating the service population, residents are given a weight of 1.0 and workers are weighted at 0.24 to reflect lower per capita service usage. The 0.24 weighting for workers is based on the amount of time workers spend in the City compared to residents. Nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average per-worker usage of services is less than average per-resident usage. Page 2 MuniFinancial City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee Table 1: Fire Facilities Service Population Residents Workers Service Population 1 Existing (2002) New Development (2002-2025) Total (2025) 28,200 31,600 59,800 19,500 30,000 49,500 32,900 38.800 71,700 Service Pop. Weighting Factor 1.00 0.24 Note: Workers are weighted at 24% of residents to reflect the amount of time workers spend in the City compared to residents. 1 Service population equals residents plus workers with each weighted by factor shown at bottom of table. Sources: Chris Foss, City of Dublin; MuniFinancial. Existin Clind Planned Fire Facilities 1': ,,: :. The inventory of existing and cost of planned fire facilities provides a basis for calculating the City's facility standard based on the total system needed to serve existing and new development. This standard is used to determine new development's fair share obligation to expand facilities as growth occurs. The planning horizon is 2025 that represents substantial build out of the City of Dublin. The facilities described here serve only the City of Dublin. The Alameda County Fire Department currently serves the City of Dublin from two fire stations (Stations 15 and 16). The City leases Station 15 from Alameda County as part of a joint-use county facility. The City owns Station 16 and associated equipment. Both stations are staffed entirely by Alameda County Fire Department personnel. The City plans to build a new station 17 to replace station 15, and a new station 18 to maintain response times as the new areas develop. This facility plan is shown in Table 2. Detailed data on the Department's master facilities to serve existing and new development are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Vehicle cost estimates shown in Table 2 include the fire fighting and emergency medical equipment needed to stock each vehicle. Table 3 summarizes the Department's existing and partially funded inventory of land, buildings, and vehicles and equipment as well as new facilities to be constructed or purchased. The new facilities represent costs to be funded from the start of the current fiscal year (FY 2002-03). Page 3 MuniFinancial City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee The existing and planned facilities summarized in these tables are designed to prevent a decline in current service standards as discussed in the next section of this report. Table 2: Existing and Planned Facilities Station Current Use Future Use 15 Single engine company Replaced by Station 17 16 17 18 Double engine company Transfer one truck to Station 17 and function as a single engine company To be built Double engine company with medical transport To be built Single engine company Sources: Alameda County Fire Department staff. MuniFinancial Page 4 City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee Table 3: Existing and Future Fire Equipment Inventory Vehicle Type and Make Vehicle Equipment Total Fire Station 16 (Existing) 1998 Pierce Quantum - Type I Engine $ 350,000 $ 110,000 $ 460,000 1984 Van Pelt - Type I Engine 350,000 110,000 460,000 2002 Ford 4X4 - Patrol 120.000 45.000 165,000 Total Fire Station 16 $ 820,000 $ 265,000 $ 1,085,000 Fire Station 17 (Existing) 1 1999 L TI - Ladder Truck $ 550,000 $ 125,000 $ 675,000 1991 Pierce - Type I Engine 350,000 110,000 460,000 1995 Fire Bann - Type III Engine 300,000 80,000 380,000 Total Fire Station 17 $1,200,000 $ 315,000 $ 1,515,000 Fire Station 18 (New) Standard GPM Pumper $ 388,000 $ 122,000 $ 510,000 2003 Ford 4X4 - Patrol 117.000 43,000 160.000 Total Fire Station 18 $ 505,000 $ 165,000 $ 670,000 Total All Vehicles & Equipment $ 2,525,000 $ 745,000 $ 3,270,000 Note: Valuation based on current replacement value. 1 Includes truck from Station #16 that will be transferred to future Station #17. Sources: Alameda County Fire Department staff; MuniFinancial. Page 5 MuniFimmcial City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee Table 4: Existing and Future Fire System Facilities Amount Unit Cost Total Cost ExistinQ and Funded Fire Station 16 (Existing): Land1 1.00 acres $ 871,200 $ 871,000 Building 1 8,815 sq.ft. 257 2,265,000 Building Contents & Equipmenf NA $ 60,000 60,000 Vehicles & Equipment NA 1,085,000 1.085,000 Subtotal Existing Facilities $ 4,281,000 Fire Station 17 (Funded as of 6/30/2002): 3 Land NA $ 654,000 $ 654,000 Building NA 322,000 322,000 Vehicles & Equipment NA 1,515,000 1.515,000 Subtotal $ 2,491,000 Fire Station 18 (Funded as of 6/30/2002): 3 Land & Building Development NA $ 308,000 $ 308.000 Subtotal $ 308,000 Total Existing $ 7,080,000 New and To Be Funded Fire Station 17 (New): 3 Building NA $ 4,010,000 $ 4,010,000 Building Contents & Equipment NA 141,000 141,000 Subtotal $ 4,151,000 Total Station 17 $ 6,642,000 Fire Station 18 (New): 3 Land 0.75 acres NA $ 429,000 Building Development NA $ 3,496,000 3,496,000 Furnishings NA 120,000 120,000 Vehicles & Equipment NA 670,000 670,000 Subtotal $ 4,715,000 Total Station 18 $ 5,023,000 Subtotal New Facilities $ 8.866.000 Total Fire System Facilities $ 15,946,000 NA = Not available or not applicable. 1 land value for Station #16 of $20 per square foot was approximated by City of Dublin staff. Building replacement cost per square foot based on $2.77 mil. for a 10.800 square foot station. 2 Represents additional equipment not included in building cost (radio, office equipment, telephone, etc). Value based on current replacement value as estimated by District staff. 3 Costs for Station 17 and 18 based on updated costs from 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program provided by Chris Foss, City oID ublin. Sources:Table 3; Alameda County Fire Department;A lameda County Fire Station Prototype Study, Don Dommer Associates. February 25, 2000; AR/WS valuation report - Dublin Ranch; 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program; City of Dublin staff; MuniFinanciaL MuniFinancial Page 6 City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee Fire FaciliJies Standards,' ,:' ", ' The fire facilities standards used'for planning new facilities and to calculate the impact fee are discussed in this section. Response Time Planning for new fire facilities typically uses a response time standard or the time from service call to arrival of the first-response team. The Alameda County Fire Department has a five-minute average response time standard. The Department currently considers that it meets that standard on a citywide basis with an average response time of five minutes or less. The planned fire facilities will enable the Department to maintain this response time standard as growth occurs. ISO Rating The Insurance Services Organization (ISO) in the form of a rating provides another standard used for planning fire facilities. The insurance industry uses ISO ratings to assist in determining insurance premiums for building owners. The ISO rating is based on travel distance (not travel time) to the nearest fire station, and other factors such as water availability and communications systems. Any deterioration in the ISO rating would have an adverse affect on property insurance rates in the City. Currently the Alameda County Fire Department, the agency that operates the fire stations serving the City of Dublin, has an ISO rating of Class 2. The Department's plans for new facilities are intended to maintain that rating as growth occurs. System Costs Per Capita The impact fee is based on a system cost standard. The system cost standard incorporates all existing and new development and public facilities designed to serve that development. The standard equals the average per capita cost of all facilities to serve the City's service population in 2025. Using this per capita standard as a basis for the impact fee ensures an equitable distribution of total system costs between existing and new development. The City's public facilities system standard is shown in Table 5. The facility standard before financing costs is the total system facility cost from Table 4 divided by the total service population from Table 1. Financing for Station 17 is needed with a loan from the City's General Fund to ensure that it is operational in time to serve new development while maintaining the Fire Department's response time standard. For this reason, and because Table 4 did not include financing costs for Page 7 MuniFinancial City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee existing stations, these costs are allocated solely to new development. The per capita cost standard is shown separately for residents and workers because their respective demand for services is weighted differently, as discussed above in the "Fire Facilities Service Population" section of this report. Table 5: Fire Facilities System Cost Standard Total System Cost 2025 Service Population Facility Standard per Capita Before Financing Cost of Financing From General Fund' Service Population Growth Within City (2002-2025) Financing Costs per Capita Facility Standard per Capita Including Financing $ 15,946,000 71.700 $ 222.40 $ 1,079,000 38.800 27.81 $ 250.21 Cost per Resident Cost per Worker $ 250.21 60.05 I Assumes $3.671 million borrowed from General Fund with five percent interest for 10 years. Sources: Tables '1 and 4; MuniFinancial. Fire Facil,ties to Accommodate New Development The allocation of system costs to new development within the City is shown in Table 6. The total cost of facilities associated with growth is based on the facility standards shown in Tables 5, and represents the maximum amount that could be funded with an impact fee. The importance of Table 6 is the bottom line that shows the share of planned facility costs that must come from revenue sources other than impact fees imposed within the City. The City plans to loan $3.9 million from the General Fund to pay for the construction of Station 17. This General Fund loan amount was reduced $237,000, as shown in Table 6, to $3.671 million to account for existing developments fair share of the system. MuniFinancial Page 8 City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee Table 6: New Development Fair Share Net Contribution From Other Revenue Sources $ 250.21 38,800 $ 9,708,000 (8,866,000) (1 ,079,000) $ (237,000) Facility Standard per Capita Service Population Growth Within City (2002-2025) New Development Fair Share of System Costs Cost of Planned Facilities Cost of Financing From General Fund Sources: Tables 1 and 5; MuniFinancial. ~Iternativ~ Fundin Sources J,' , ' I; , The City plans to use impact fee revenues to complete Station 17 and 18, including land, buildings, and vehicles and equipment. The City plans to loan $3.9 million from the General Fund to complete Station 17 to be repaid with impact fee revenue. The City does not anticipate any alternative funding sources being available for fire facilities. Fee Sche~ule' l '\' p" ,; I "",, ,,:' " " The City is enabling developers to build fire facilities and dedicate them to the City. In this case the City will grant a credit against the fire impact fee up to the cost of the facilities dedicated. The credit will be for only that portion of the fee that otherwise would fund those dedicated facilities Oand, buildings, or vehicles and equipment). Thus, if the dedicated facilities only include buildings, then the credit will only be for that portion of the fee needed to fund buildings. To enable the City to calculate the credit, Table 7 shows the percent of the impact fee attributable to land, buildings, and equipment. This percentage is applied to the fee in Table 8. MuniFinancial Page 9 City of Dublin Fire Fadlities Impact Fee Table 7: Fire Facilities Impact Cost Components Cost Components Capital Projects land Bldg Equipment Total Station 17 $ - $ 4,010,000 $ 141,000 $ 4,151,000 Station 18 429,000 3.496,000 790,000 4,715,000 Total $ 429,000 $ 7,506,000 $ 931,000 $ 8,866,000 Percent of Total 5% 85% 10% 100% Sources: Table 4; MuniFinancial. Table 8 shows the fire facilities impact fee for new development based on the facilities cost per capita as shown in Tables 4. Resident and employment density assu~ptions are drawn from earlier impact fee studies completed for the City. The fee represents the maximum justified fee to fully fund all fire facilities needed to accommodate growth based on the facility system cost standard. Both residential and nonresidential development would pay the fee based on the service population for fire facilities. Table 8: Fire Facilities Impact Fee Cost Per Fee2 Capita Equip- land Use Density1 (rounded) land Bldg ment Total Residential Single Family 3.20 $ 250 $ 39 $ 677 $ 84 $ 800 Multifamily 2.00 250 24 423 53 500 Nonresidential Office 260 $ 60 $ 11 $ 196 $ 24 $ 231 Commercial 505 60 6 101 12 119 Industrial 590 60 5 86 11 102 1 Persons per dwelling unit for residential land uses and square feet per employee for nonresidential land uses. 2 Per dwelling unit for residential uses and per 1,000 square feet for nonresidential land uses. Sources: Public Facilities Fee Study, 1998 Update prepared by Hausrath Economics Group; Tables 5 and 7; MuniFinancial. Pro ram ;Implementation . The fire facilities impact fee would be collected at time of building permit issuance. To implement the fee the City should: MuniFinancial Page 10 City of Dublin Fire Facilities Impact Fee . Maintain an annual Capital Improvement Program budget to indicate where fees are being expended to accommodate growth; . Comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of Government Code 66001 and 66006; and . Identify appropriate inflation indexes in the fee ordinance and allow an automatic inflation adjustment to the fee annually. Page 11 MuniFinancial Residential Single Family Multi-Family Non-Residential Commercial Office Industrial PROPOSED FIRE FACILITY FEE (by Land Use Type) $800 per unit $500 per unit $ .119 per square foot $.231 per square foot $.102 per square foot Exhibit C