HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.01 StopSignLewis&PortageCITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: April 13, 1987
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing: STOP Sign at the Intersection of
Lewis Avenue and Portage Road
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Draft Ordinance
2) Excerpt from Letter from Lyn Dinelli
3) Report from TJKM
4)
5)
Open Public Hearing
Receive Staff report and public testimony
Question Staff and the public
Close Public Hearing and deliberate
Waive reading and adopt ordinance for installation
of STOP sign on Lewis Ave. at intersection of
Portage Road; approve installation of related
improvements.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Approximately $800 for installation of sign and
pavement markings.
DESCRIPTION:
Staff received a request from Mrs. Lyn Dinelli of Portage Road
regarding the need for traffic control at the intersection of Lewis Avenue and
Portage Road. At the time her letter was written, there was not a "NO U TURN"
sign posted for eastbound traffic on Lewis; however, the sign has since been
replaced.
findings:
TJKM has investigated this intersection and presents the following
Traffic Volumes
Twenty-four hour traffic counts were made on March 16th and 17th.
Traffic approaching from Lewis Avenue totaled 936 vehicles per day.
Southbound vehicular volume on Portage Road was 180 vpd, and northbound was
847 vpd. The peak hour volume on Portage Road was 86 vehicles per hour and on
Lewis Avenue was 121 vph. The primary turning movements are right turns from
Lewis onto Portage and the reverse left turn from Portage onto Lewis. The
average hourly volume of the eight highest hours was 148 vph. The daily
approach volumes, plus high turning volumes, plus some sight distance
restrictions, indicate that a STOP sign is warranted on Lewis Avenue. Review
of total hourly volumes, however, indicates that STOP signs should not be
installed on Portage Road.
Accident History
There were six reported accidents between January of 1984 and the
end of March, 1987. Only one accident involved two moving vehicles; the
1. Install STOP sign, legend, and limit line on Lewis Avenue.
2. Install ceramic and reflective raised pavement markers along
the existing double yellow centerline on Lewis Avenue.
3. Install raised pavement markers along the existing single
yellow centerlines on all approaches to the intersection on Portage Road.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
ordinance on an urgency basis and authorize Staff to implement the recommended
improvements.
ORDINANCE NO. 22-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
Section 1. STOP MANDATORY ON ALL APPROACHES:
Article 4, relating to "Stop Intersections", of the Alameda County
Ordinance Code previously adopted by the City of Dublin is amended by the addition of
Sections 6-81.20 to read:
6-81.20 Lewis Avenue at the intersection of Portage Road.
Section 2. IMMEDIATE EFFECT:
This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its enactment
because the adoption and immediate effect thereof is necessary in order to protect
vehicular and pedestrian safety.
Section 3. POSTING OF ORDINANCE:
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to
be posted in at least three (3) public -places in the City of Dublin in accordance
with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin on this 13th
day of April, 1987.
AYES: Councilmembers Hegarty, Moffatt, Snyder, Vonheeder
and Mayor Jeffery
NOES: None
ABSENT: None L_
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
RECElYED
FEB ]. ,3 1987
CITY OF F, UE,,LIN
MEMORANDUM
4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 214
Pleasanton Ca. 94566
(415) 463-0611
DATE: April 3, 1987
TO: Lee Thompson
FROM: Ty Tekawa
SUBJECT:
Traffic Investigation - Lewis Avenue and Portage Road
Richard Ambrose received a letter from a Dublin citizen on February 13, 1987.
Among various items in the letter, concern was expressed about the need for
traffic control at the intersection of Lewis Avenue and Portage Road. A "blind
section" at the corner was referenced, as well as the absence of a NO U-TURN
sign, and accidents involving parked cars. Since this letter, a NO U-TURN sign
has been installed.
In response to the citizen's letter, TJKM has completed an investigation of the
traffic situation at the intersection.
The investigation included a field survey, traffic counts and a review of accident
history. The field survey consisted of an overview of existing physical and traffic
conditions. The traffic counts were used to compare traffic volumes against
criteria for installing STOP signs. Accident history was reviewed to uncover any
apparent patterns related to the reported collisions.
Field Survey
The development along Lewis Avenue is primarily commercial from Village
Parkway to Portage Road. Only the corner lots at Lewis Avenue and Portage Road
are single family residential. All the development fronting along Portage Road is
single family residential. Both Lewis Avenue and Portage Road are forty feet
wide. A double yellow centerline stripe has been painted along Lewis Avenue.
Single yellow stripes are painted at the intersection approaches on Portage Road.
There is a STOP sign controlling Lewis Avenue at Village Parkway. The only
control at Portage Road is a NO U-TURN (R34) sign for traffic approaching on
Lewis Avenue. Parking is allowed on both streets except for some red curb on
Lewis Avenue near Village Parkway. All these existing features are depicted on
Figure 1. Visibility to the south is somewhat limited for traffic entering the
intersection on Lewis Road because of parked cars and a curve in Portage Road.
Traffic Volumes
Twenty-four hour machine counts were made on March 16 and 17, 1987. The
counts recorded the total volume of traffic approaching the intersection from each
street and also showed the hourly volumes. These volumes were checked against
warrants for STOP signs (Figures 2 and 3). Traffic approaching from Lewis
Avenue totaled 936 vehicles per day (vpd). Southbound vehicular volume on
Portage Road was 180 vpd and northbound was 847 vpd. The peak hour volume on
Portage Road was 86 vehicles per hour (vph) and on Lewis Avenue was 121 vph.
The predominant traffic movements are the right turn from Lewis Avenue onto
PLEASANTON · SACRAMENTO · FRESNO · CONCORD
Mr. Lee Thompson
-2- April 3, 1987
Portage Road and the reverse left turn movement from Portage Road onto Lewis
Avenue. The average hourly volume of the eight highest hours equaled 148 vph.
The sum of the daily approach volumes and the high turning volumes, plus some
sight distance restrictions indicate that a STOP sign is warranted on Lewis Avenue.
Review of total hourly volumes, however, indicate that STOP signs should not be
installed on the Portage Road approaches.
Accident History
There were six reported accidents from January 1, 1984 to March 31, 1987. As
shown on the collision diagram (Figure 4), there was only one accident involving
two moving vehicles. All of the other accidents involved a single moving vehicle
and either a parked car or a fixed object. Of the six accidents, two involved
vehicles turning onto Lewis Avenue from Portage Road. One accident involved a
moving southbound vehicle and a vehicle parked legally facing north. Four of the
six accidents occurred in hours of darkness. A STOP sign on Lewis Avenue and
some improved night-time delineation near the intersection may have helped to
prevent these accidents.
Recommendation
Based on the field review, traffic volume counts and accident report review, it is
our recommendation to implement the following improvements (see Figure 1):
Install STOP sign, legend and limit line on Lewis Avenue.
Install ceramic and reflective raised pavement markers along the existing
double yellow centerline on Lewis Avenue.
Install raised pavement markers along the existing single yellow centerlines on
the approaches to the intersection on Portage Road.
nlc
157-001
~ (, DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE~~ ~ ~-'~~
~ ~ INSTAL~ ........ ~ ~ ~EX~TING ~
~ ~X {~'~~-~-~-~-' x~~ .~~.~.s ,~,
,..,,
R~ = STOP S~N NO SCALE
LEW~S AVENUE AN9 PORTAGE ROAD RECOaUENDE9 ~aP.OVEaENTS
CITY OF DUBLIN ~~ F~GURE
TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
FIGURE 2
WARRANTS FOR TWO-WAY STOP SIGN INSTALLATION
Stop sign installation may be considered if any TWO of'the
following conditions exist:
1. ~0L~..~E
(a) Total vehicular volume on the major street must
be 500 vehicles per day or 50 vehicles per hour
during the peak hour on ~n average day,
(b) Total vehicular volume on the minor street must
be 250 vehicles per day or 25 vehicles per hour
during the peak hour on an average day,
2. ACCIDENTS
Two or more of types susceptible of correction by stop
signs within a 12-month period. Yield sign to be consi-
dered if no other warrant is met.
3. VISIBILITY
Critical approach speeds less than 15 mph.
4. UNUSUAL CONDITIONS
Where 85-percentile speeds greater than 25 mph prevail
or where unusual conditions exist (such as school, play-
ground, steep hill, etc.)
Be
Stop sign installation may be considered if any ONE of the
following conditions exist:
1. VOLUME
(a) Total vehicular volume on the major street must
be 1000 vehicles per day or 100 vehicles per hour
during the peak hour on an average day.
(b) Total vehicular volume on the minor street must
be 500 vehicles per day or 50 vehicles per hour
during the peak hour on an average day.
2. ACCIDEb~S
Four or more of types susceptible of correction by stop
signs within a 12-month period.
3. VISIBILITY
Critical approach speeds of 10 mph or less.
FIGURE 3
WARRANTS FOR FOUR-WAY STOP SIGN INSTALLATION
Four-way stop sign installation may be considered if any
of the following conditions exist,
1. VOLD~4E
(a) Total vehicular volume entering the intersection
from all approaches must average 300 per hour for
any 8 hours of an average day. (24-hour equivs_l-
ent approximately 4000 vehicles.)
(b) In addition, the vehicular volume entering the in-
tersection from the minor street or streets for the
same 8 hours must average at least 1/3 of the total
volume entering the intersection (100 per hour min.)
2. ACCIDENTS
Five or more of types susceptible of correction by stop
signs within a 12-month period, with satisfactory ob-
servance and enforcement of less restrictive control.
3. VISIBILITY
The straight line sight distance on one or more approach-
es of the major street for vehicles or pedestrians cross-
ing the intersection is less thsm 160 feet.
4. RESIDENTIAL AREA
Volume warrants to be reduced to 60% of the values above
if ALL of the following conditions are met~
(a)
Both streets have residential frontage with existing
25 mph speed limits.
(c)
(a)
Neither street is an adopted through street.
Neither street exceeds 40 feet of roadway width.
No existing stop sign or signal is located on the
more heavily traveled street within a distance of
800 feet.
(e)
(f)
Intersection has four legs, with streets extending
800 feet or more away from the intersection on at
least three sides.
Installation of a four-way stop is compatable with
overall traffic circulation needs for the residen-
tial area.
ACC DATE 'I ,E
/. 5'-~5- ~4 2/..5'0 (0
2. ~-2£- 85' /~
~. ~- ~4 - ~ U~K~O~N
4. 12-12-~5 I ~00 (~)
L [lJI..5 ,,~ VE
FIGURE 4
LEGEND:
(~ RIGHT ANGLE
-(~ LEFT TURN
---(3--- REAR -END '-
~ HEAD-ON '-
~ SIDE SWIPE, REAR- EN[
~ SIDE SWIPE, HEAD-ON
PED_.~raKE PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE
~ BACKING
(L) DAYUGHT
(D) DARKNESS
0 PROPERTY DAMAGE
l'"l FIXED OBJECT
~) INJURY
· FATAL
E~ PARKED CAR
~ OUT .OF CONTROL
FOR,xl CD- 2
CITY OF
DU~L IiV
LOCATION
,/Eidlb hVE.
POD Tt~ G E
PERIOD COVERED:
/-/-,~4 to 3-/7-~7
DATE
COMPILED-~ 3-..51-~7
^
Traffic Control on Lewis and Portage Rd. Public Hearing April
13, 1987;signatures collected by Lyn Dinelli on 4-12-6- to
represent residents unable to attend. -]°��[) Dvv�
We the undersigned unable to attend the Public Hear inL, on
4-13-87 at the DublinLibrary concerning TRAFFIC CONTROL at the
intersection of Lewis and Portage Rd feel that traffic control
is necessary and ask the Council to do so.
Siganture Address Phone
L/
/'ry ' v~4�/�m ~-
^ '
� �
2 ( ��'' �*o �� Ap'� SL=
��
�
�� /-� \
.~�
4
5 ����-���}
\ , � ��-� -~, �-� 0
6
' �
3 9
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
2% 1