Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Reso 041-96 TIF Benefit Fee
RESOLUTION N0.41- 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REVISING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE AND AREA OF BENEFIT FEE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN AREA, AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1-95 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Ordinance No. 14-94 which creates and establishes the authority for imposing and charging a Transportation Impact Fee; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("GPA") and Specific Plan ("SP") were adopted by the City in 1993; and WHEREAS, the GPA outlines future land uses for approximately 4,176 acres within the City's eastern sphere of influence including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square feet of commercial, office, and industrial development; and WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs for approximately 3,313 acres within the GPA area nearest to the City; and ,.-. WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas ("Eastern Dublin") are shown on the Land Use Map contained in the GPA (attached hereto as Ezhibit A and exclude the area shown on the Land Use Map as "Future Study Area/Agriculture"; and WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the GPA and SP (SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993 by Resolution No. 51-93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 ("Addenda") have been prepared and considered by the Council; and. WHEREAS, the SP, EIR, and Addenda describe the freeway, freeway interchange, and road improvements necessary for implementation of the SPs along with transit improvements, pedestrian trails, and bicycle paths; and WHEREAS, the EIR and Addenda assumed that certain trafFic improvements would be made and that development within Eastern Dublin would pay its proportionate share of such improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a "Mitigation Monitoring Program: Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment" by Resolution No. 53-93 which requires development within Eastern Dublin to pay its proportionate share of certain transportation improvements necessary to mitigate impacts caused by development within Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, the SP, EIR., and Addenda describe the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities in Eastern Dublin through the Year 2010, and contain an analysis of the need for new public facilities and improvements required by future development withir~Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1-95 on January 9, 1995, establishing an "Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee" for development within Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City of Dublin by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., in a document dated November 1994 and entitled "Traffic Impact Fee--Eastern Dublin" (hereafter "Study"), which is attached as Exhibit B to Resolution No. 1-95; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 further relies upon a second report which was prepared for the City of Dublin by Santina and Thompson in a document dated December 30, 1994, entitled "Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Study/Roadway Costs, Initial Level" (hereinafter "Report"), which was attached as Exhibit C to Resolution No. 1-95; and WHEREAS, Section 8 of Resolution No. 1-95 provides that the City will periodically review the fee and make revisions as appropriate; and WHEREAS, the City has retained TJKM Transportation Consultants to assist the City in reviewing and updating the Traffic Impact Fee; and WHEREAS, TJKM has prepared a revised report dated January 4, 1996, as revised and entitled "1995 Update to the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee" (hereafter "Study Update") which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Study Update includes and incorporates revised cost estimates for anticipated roadway improvements, prepared by Santina & Thompson and dated January 3, 1996 as revised (hereafter "Cost Estimate Report Update"), which are attached hereto as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95, in reliance upon~the Study and Report, sets forth the relationship between future development in Eastern Dublin, the needed improve-ments and facilities, and the estimated costs of those improvements.and facilities; and WHEREAS, the Study Update and the Cost Estimate Report Update demonstrate the appropriateness of modifying the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee in certain respects; and WHEREAS, the Study Update and the Cost Estimate Report Update were available for public inspection and review for ten (10) days prior to this public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. The purpose of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (hereafter "Fee") is to finance public improvements and facilities needed to reduce the traffic-related impacts caused by 2 future development in Eastern Dublin. The public improvements and facilities are listed in the Study and the Study Update under Sections I, II, and III and are hereafter defined and referred to as "Improvements and Facilities". The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section I are needed solely to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin. The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section II are needed to accommodate new development projected within Eastern Dublin and the nearby vicinity and development within Eastern Dublin will pay its fair proportional share of such Improvements and Facilities with the implementation of this Fee. The Improvements and Facilities listed under Section III ("Section III Improvements") are all necessary to accommodate new development projected within the region by the Year 2010, including development within Eastern Dublin. However, if there later are changes in the projections and development in the region, one or more of the Improvements and Facilities may. not be necessary, and additional improvements and facilities maybe required. Such alternative improvements and facilities are included in the definition of Improvement and Facilities to the extent development in Eastern Dublin contributes to the need for such improvements and facilities, and the proceeds of the Fee may be used to fund such alternate improvements and facilities. However, since the Study was prepared in December 1994, there have been no significant changes in projects warranting any revisions to the list of Section III Improvements. B. The fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the Improvements and Facilities. C. After considering the Study, the Study Update, the Cost Estimate Report, the Cost --° Estimate Report Update, Resolution No. 1-95, the Agenda Statement, the GPA, the SP, the General Plan, the EIR and Addenda, all correspondence received and the testimony received at the noticed public hearings held on January 23 and continued to the meetings of February 27, March 26, and April 9, 1996, (hereafter the "record"), the Council reapproves and readopts the Study, as revised by the Study Update, and. the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the Cost Estimate Report Update, and incorporates each herein, and further finds that future development in Eastern Dublin will generate the need for the Improvements and Facilities .and the Improvements and Facilities are consistent with the GPA, the SP, and the City's General Plan. D. The adoption of the Fee is within the scope of the EIR and Addenda. The Improvements and Facilities were all identified in the EIR as necessary to accommodate traffic from and/or to mitigate impacts of development in Eastern Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the Improvements and Facilities, were adequately analyzed at a Program level in the EIR. Since the certification of the EIR, there have been no substantial changes in the projections of future development as identified in the EIR, no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances, and no other new information of substantial importance so as to require important revisions in the EIR's analysis of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA of the Specific Improvements and Facilities will be required before any such Improvements and Facilities are approved. It is not feasible to provide project specific environmental review of the Improvements and Facilities at this stage, as they will be implemented over at least a 20-year period and specific details as to .their timing and construction are not presently known. E. The record establishes: 1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Improvements and Facilities and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged in that new development in Eastern Dublin -- both residential and non-residential -- will generate traffic which generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and 2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the Fee's use (to pay for the construction of the Improvements and Facilities) and the type of development for which the Fee is charged in that all development in Eastern Dublin -- both residential and non-residential -- generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and 3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fee and the cost of the Improvements and Facilities or portion thereof attributable to development in Eastern Dublin in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of trips generated by specific types of land uses, the total amount it will cost to construct the Improvements and Facilities, and the percentage by which development within Eastern Dublin contributes to the need for the Improvements and Facilities; and 4. That the cost estimates set forth in the Study, as revised by the Study Update, and the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the Cost Estimate Report Update, are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Improvements and Facilities, and the Fees expected. to be generated by future development will not exceed the projected costs of constructing the Improvements and Facilities; and 5. The method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development, set forth in the Study, as revised in the Study Update, bears a fair and reasonable relationship to each development's burden on, and benefit from, the Improvements and Facilities to be funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of automobile trips each particular development will generate. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does RESOLVE as follows: 1. Definitions 'R~ a. "Development" shall mean the construction, alteration or addition of any building or structure within Eastern Dublin. b. "Eastern Dublin" shall mean all property within the "General Plan Amendment Study Area" as shown on the Land Use Map Exhibit A hereto) excepting the property designated as "Future Study Area/Agriculture." The individual properties within this area are listed by assessor's parcel number on Exhibit D of this resolution. c. "Improvements and Facilities" shall include those transportation and transit improvements and facilities as are described in Sections I, II and III of the Study and as described in the Study Update, Cost Estimate Report, Cost Estimate Report Update, SP, EIR and Addenda. 4 "Improvements and Facilities" shall also include comparable alternative improvements and ,~ facilities should later changes in projections of development in the region necessitate construction of such alternative improvements and facilities; provided that the City Council later determines (1) that there is a reasonable relationship between development within Eastern Dublin and the need for the alternative improvements and facilities, (2) that the alternative improvements and facilities are comparable to the improvements and facilities in the Study and Study Update, and (3) that the revenue from the Fee will be used only to pay Eastern Dublin development's fair and proportionate share of the alternative improvements and facilities. d. "Low Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for up to six units per acre. e. "Medium Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 6 to 14 units per acre. f. "Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit" shall. mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 14 to 25 units per acre. g. "High Density Dwelling Unit" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (IIBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 25 units per acre. 2. Traffic Impact Fee Imposed. a. A Traffic Impact Fee ("Fee") shall be charged and paid for each Low Density Dwelling Unit, Medium Density Dwelling Unit, Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit, and High Density Dwelling Unit within Eastern Dublin no later than the date of final inspection for the unit, provided that the Fee shall be payable by the date that the building permit is issued for any such Unit from and after the date the City Council approves a Capital Improvement Program for the Improvements and Facilities. ~ _ b: ' A Fee shall be charged and paid for rioh-residential buildings or structures within Eastern Dublin by the date that the building permit is issued for such building or structure, except where the building or structure will require a later stage of discretionary approval by the City before it can be occupied, in which case, with the approval of the Public Works Director, the Fee for that building or structure may be deferred for payment to the date the City makes the last discretionary approval which is required prior to occupancy. 3. Amount of Fee. a. Low Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Low Density '`~' Dwelling Unit shall be $4,182 per unit. b. Medium Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Medium Density Dwelling Unit shall be $4,182 per unit. c. Medium/High Density Dwelling Units. The amount of the Fee for each Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $2,928 per unit. d. High Density Dwellin Units. The amount of the Fee for each High Density Dwelling Unit shall be $2,509 per unit. e. Non-Residential Buildings or Structures. The amount of the Fee for each Non-Residential Building or Structure shall be $354 per average weekday trip. The amount of Traffic Impact Fees for Residential and Non-Residential Uses are shown on Exhibit E. 4. Exemptions From Fee. a. The Fee shall not be imposed on any of the following: (1} Any alteration or addition to a residential structure, except to the extent that a residential unit is added to a single- family residential unit or another unit is added to an existing multi- family residential unit; (2) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished provided that the building permit for reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished unless the replacement or reconstruction increases the square footage of the structure fifty percent or more. (3) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished provided that the building permit for new reconstruction is obtained within one year after the building. was destroyed or demolished and the reconstructed building would not increase the destroyed or demolished building's trips based on Exhibit E. 5. Use of Fee Revenues. a. The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall be placed in the Capital Project Fund. Separate and special accounts within the Capital Project Fund shall be used to account for such revenues, along with any interest earnings on each account. The revenues (and interest) shall be used for the following purposes: (1) To pay for design, engineering, right-of--way acquisition and construction of the Improvements and Facilities and reasonable costs of outside consultant studies related thereto; 6 (2) To reimburse the City for the Improvements and '"' Facilities constructed by the City with funds from other sources including funds from other public entities, unless the City funds were obtained from grants or gifts intended by the grantor to be used for traffic improvements. (3) To reimburse developers and/or public agencies who have constructed Improvements and Facilities; and (4} To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing administration of the Fee program. b. Fees in these accounts shall be expended only for the Improvements and Facilities and only for the purpose for which the Fee was collected. . 6. Miscellaneous. a. .The standards upon which the needs for the Improvements and Facilities are based are the standards of the City of Dublin, including the standards contained in the General Plan, GPA, SP, EIR, and Addenda. b. The City Council determines that there are no existing deficiencies within -- Eastern Dublin and that the need for the Improvements and Facilities in Category I (Section I) of the Study is generated entirely by new development within Eastern Dublin and, further, that the need for the Improvements and Facilities in Category II .and. III (Sections II and III) of the Study is generated by new development within Eastern Dublin and other new development and, therefore, the Study, as revised by the Study Update, has determined the proportionate share of the cost of the Improvements and Facilities for which development within Eastern Dublin is responsible. Exhibit D identifies the list of property owners by Assessor's Parcel Number. 7. Periodic Review. a. During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare a report for the City Council, pursuant to Government Code section 66006, identifying the balance of fees in each account. '~'- b. Pursuant to Government Code section 66002, the City Council shall also review, as part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the approximate location, size, time of availability and estimates of cost for all Improvements and Facilities to be financed with the Fee. The estimated costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council shall make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and demonstrating a reasonable relationship, between the Fee and the purpose for which it is charged. 7 8. Subsequent Analysis of the Fee. The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the Council in reliance on the record identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the Fee should be revised. Further study shall be made in increments of no more than two {2) years. When additional information is available, the City Council shall review the Fee to determine that the amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of development within Eastern Dublin. The City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the findings and conclusions of further studies and any standards in the GPA, SP and General Plan, as well as increases due to inflation and increased construction costs. 9. Tri-Valley Regional Fee. The City has joined with other cities and counties in the Tri-Valley area in a joint powers agreement to fund preparation of a "Tri-Valley Transportation PIan" for the purpose of addressing. transportation issues through the Year 2010 within the Tri-Valley area. The "Tri- Valley Transportation Council," an advisory group consisting of elected representatives from each jurisdiction, has prepared a "Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance" (hereafter "Action Plan". The City Council adopted the Action Plan by Resolution No. 100-95 on August 8, 1995. The Action Plan indicates that further study is necessary of a proposed regional transportation impact fee which would share funding of regional transportation improvements among development within the various jurisdictions. Because the Tri-Valley Transportation Council has not yet developed a regional traffic impact fee, the Study, as revised by the Study Update, has analyzed Eastern Dublin's proportionate share of responsibility for regional improvements which is set forth in Section III of the Study. In the event that a regional transportation impact fee is developed by the Tri-Valley Transportation Council and adopted by the City, the City Council will amend the portion of the Fee which is attributable to Section III improvements. 10. Area of Benefit Fee. A portion of the Fee shall also be deemed to be an Area of Benefit Fee adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 10-94. This is the portion of the Fee designated for the construction of those improvements and facilities identified in Category I (Section I) of the Study which are major thoroughfares and bridges. These improvements and'the estimated cost of such improvements are listed on Exhibit F attached hereto. The "Area of Benefit" is Eastern Dublin as defined herein. The fee shall be apportioned over the Area of Benefit in the same manner set forth in Section 3 of this resolution and in the Study, with the amount to be assessed for residential and non-residential as shown on Exhibit F. The Area of Benefit Fee shall be deposited into the City's Capital Projects Fund into separate accounts established for each of the improvements identified in Exhibit F. 11. Administrative Guidelines The Council may, by resolution, adopt administrative guidelines to provide procedures for reimbursement, credit or other administrative aspects of the Fee. The amount of any reimbursement or credit shall be determined by the Public works Director using the costs. of 8 construction and value ofright-of--way used by the City in calculating and establishing the Fee. ..~-~ The amount of any reimbursement or credit, once established, shall not be increased for inflation nor shall interest accrue on such amount. No credit or reimbursement shall be given unless the improvements constructed are the Improvements and Facilities described herein. Reimbursement shall only be from revenues raised by Payment of the Fee. 12. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately. The Fee provided in Sections 2 and 3 of this resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the resolution and shall supersede the Fee established by Resolution No. 1-95 sixty (60) days from the effective date of the resolution. The Area of Benefit Fee established in Section 10 of this resolution shall be effective only if the Fee provided in Sections 2 and 3 hereof is declared invalid for any reason. 13. Severability. Each component of the Fee and all portions of this resolution are severable: Should any individual component of the Fee or other provision of this resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be and continue to be fully effective, and the Fee shall be fully effective except as to that portion that has been judged to be invalid. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 1996, by the following vote: .--~ AYES:- Councilmembers Barnes, Burton, Moffatt and Mayor Houston NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Howard ABSTAIN: None MAYOR ATTEST: ! !~ ~~ IT CLE g: iagenmtsciresotif K'%g/4-9-96/reso-tif. doc 9 • General•>ilan -Eastern Extended Planning Are2 ~,.. ~~--~ l~1ND USE MAP -~. _~- ~- t_egend COt+1MERGIAL .~--P\J,M.EOA /- , ~ Ne(ghbahood Commercial . -- f~^ r - 4 ~ General Commercial `, ''"""~ Campus Ofrr,e S .~ /-- t. ~ r ~7 Industrial Park 1 -~ r RESIDENTIAL ~- flflA ~_--~ ~----~ ~M -) H'gh Densty 25• du~ac -'f--..~ __-__ -- ----~, r-M-H--~ Med'urmHgh Density 14-25 d,,rac E u y MH` L flAA ~ ~ . ~ t Medium Density 6-,4 ddac ~~~'*~ I ~ ~ C~ Low Density 06d/ac ,~ •''•-•' .jury.'. _"~ ~ ; RHA Rural ResidentiaUAgriculture, cWt00 ac ~,~ .=:.MH MH ?lleLiC/SEMf•PUBLIC70PEN ~f, / M ~ ' `` flflA ' FUTURE STUDY AREA ~ PubGc/5emi•Pubtc FaciGly flaA -' ~~' ~?•?.~ Elementary School I ' ® ,lunior t4igh School ,: ° ra - I I ® Hgh School "~. i ~. `~1 _~ f A G R f C U LTUR E ~ ~ PubGC/Semi-Pubk {-r;: L ~ ,~~ / - ~ J ) I ~ Parks S Recreal'an x.1.4 1 - / L ---- r--~ © Ciry Park ~ •'' -,' I ~ - 1 , ~ ® Community Park 1 _ - 1 _ - > ""A~ 2743.9 Acres ` ®Neighbamood Park ' ~ -~ -_ . ~ Neighborhood Square - 1 _- - i 1 - I ' ~ OPen SPace { -_ 1 - . _ ` - - __ f ~ ~ Stream Corridor ~_'` r 1 ~;`~` • ,r, i CIRCULATION _°_ °--.°_--__°-~ _ s. - - . -~ -- ~_ -_-- v \T~ .. .. .-- f~. ' {~ ...~... ArlerlaiStreet ' - 1 `.">~~ ~~ i; i ~ I 1 ~----- GolectorStreet "ri'- -•~•- ~~ ~T =,, .- I ..~ f SOI Boundary '~\` . ~ 1-= „ • ~ r • N ~ 1 ~ .., ~ r I .+-_..--- General Plan Amendment Swdy Mea . {, ' '• ' I 1 1 e.• ~ ~ - ., ..: - I•` .I.. ...•. Specific Plan SNdYAA'rea _~ ~..........~". ,. ..- .. _ : ~ - .-. - ~ ~.- "_ ~'~--_ ` ~ __ __ =I ,~STERIV May ,o, 1993 • t lr_r'' .. . ~... 1 ~. - - i ~ . - . t. ; - - ' . ~ • - - L t.~ 14 Acres l ----------= r.~_.. RR hh'' , 1----`°-__--_ -` -- 1°•--° -----~- -- ---- -- - - ,_- _,~ ,~~~~ WalaceRoberts~Todd Figrre2S - ~ ~ :~~ \~~~ w ` a * General Commercial may be permitted Dy a nlanne$ vet'913'yP~?n! fPfJf19 °i26gss (seN text {or complete discussbn } ~~!11 iG3r ~ ** Wit canven ,o Future Study Area/Agriculnrre where determined inconsistent with APA fsee text for complete discussion) tats - - Transportation Consultants MEMO January 4, 1996 (Revised) To: Mehran Sepehri, City of Dublin From: Vinton Bacon Cazl Springer Project No.: 157-001 Task 7 Subject: 1995 Update to the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (Revised January 4,.1996) TJKM has completed the update of the Eastern Dublin TIF for 1995. This memorandum explains the new information that was used to revise the previous technical report which was prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates Inc. in November 1994 (hereafter referred to as the original report). The. majority of the information, methodologies, assumptions and findings of the original report were retained in developing the updated fee structure. Only the changes to that report are identified below. . Changes to the 1994 TIF Report 1. New Cost Estimates - As more studies have been completed for the planned infrastructure to support Eastern Dublin and the surrounding region, better cost estimates have become available for use in the TIF calculation. New cost estimates for the improvements applied to the TIF were provided by Santina & Thompson. The total fees covered by the TIF rose by approximately $20 million from $101,444,240 to $121,995,379. 2. New Residential Trip Categories -The TIF rate structure used in the original .report combined all residential uses into 'two categories -- single-family and multi- family. This update recognized that the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan shows four categories of residential development based on ranges of unit density per acre. By adding two residential categories, the accompanying calculation for residential trips was adjusted based on standard trip generation data. The selected trip generation rates were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers .Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, the San Diego Association of Governments October 1993 Traffic Generation Rates and engineering judgement Table 2.1 shows the rates used for each of the four residential use categories. The only change made from the original report is for high-density residentiai development The Iower rate more accurately reflects the propensity for a Iower number of residents and incomes per household in apartment units as compared to townhome or condominium units. The change in trip generation rate from 7 per unit to 6 per unit for high density uses results in a decrease in the total number of residential trips from 123,679 to 121,232. 4637 Chabot Drive, Suite 214, Pleasanton, CA 94588-2754, (510) 463-0 ~ Pl~santon Frasrw .Santa Rosa • Mehran Sepehri Page 2 Table 2-1 Trip Generation Rates Residential Trip Generation Rate - Trip Generation Rate - Land Use Type Density (DU/Acre) Original Report 1995 Update (Daily Trips/Unit) (Daily Trips/Unit) Low Density 1~ 10 10 Medium Density 7-14 10 10 Medium~High Density 15-25 7 '7 High Density >25 7 6 3. Re-Assessment of the Percent Responsibility for the I-580/I-b80 Interchange Project -The original report calculated the responsibility for funding the I-580/I- 680 interchange project based on the Tri-Valley Transportation Model during the p.m. peak hour of travel. These percentages were changed based on data obtained from the Alameda County Traffic Authority dated November 1995. The new data (shown in Section 3 Fees, Table 2-4) indicate a higher share for Eastern Dublin, Pleasanton and San Ramon, and a much lower share for Central Dublin. The percentage contribution for East Dublin changed from 12 percent to 24 percent. 4. Residential Development Improvement Responsibilities -The original report `v.~'' added the cost of park-and-ride lots to the exclusive responsibility of residential development. AIl other fees were proportionately divided among all land uses based on the relative share of trip generation. This update also added the Tassajara Creek Bicycle Trail to the exclusive responsibility of residential development. This was previously lumped into the Section 1 fees for all land uses. Updated TIF Cost Structure The TIF calculations were revised based on the above changes. As in the original report, the T1F costs were tiered for varying azeas of responsibilities which were described as Section 1 (East Dublin Only), Section 2 (Sub-Regional) and Section 3 ('liri-Valley) as depicted in'Tables 2-2, 2-3 and 2-4 in the 1994 report. These same tables were reprinted with the above changes incorporated (see attachments). Two new tables were created to present important summary information. Table 2-5 is a summary table which shows the total costs, and cost per trip for each of the three sections. Finally, Table 2-6 presents the recalculated the cost of residential development based on the new assumptions. The cost per trip for non-residential trips increased from $293 to $354. The cost per trip for residential units increased from $335.50 io $418.25. Atrachmenu 157-0O1.T7 ,,~.., Table 2-2 Section ~ Fees: Eastern Dublin Res onsibiti '100 Percent Se ment/lm rovement Cost Estimate Duhlin Boulevard $ 34,711,870 Southern Pacific Right-of-Way to Airway Boulevard Hacienda Drive 4,059,603 Gleason to Dublin (four lanes} Dublin to I-580 (six lanes} Hacienda Driven-5801mprovements 4,146,000 Transit Spine and Arnold Drive 10,724,892 Dublin w!o Hacienda to Fallon (four lanes) Gleason Drive 5,197,353 w/o Hacienda to Fallon (four lanes} Tassa}ara Road 8,861,039 Dublin Boulevard to Contra Costa County (four laneslsix lanes right-of-way) Dublin Boulevard tot-580 (six lanes/eight lanes right of way) Tassajata!(-5801nterchange 9,402,921 Fallon Raad 7,486,636 1-580 to Tassajara (four lane/six-lane right-of-way) Project Study Reports - El CharrolFalloNt-580 Improvements 220,000 Traffic Impact Fee Study 90,000 Street Au nment 5tua 451,000 Subtofat of Costs $ 85,351,314 Total Number of Oaily Trips 344,fl78 Cost er Tri ~ $ 248 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fes Update Page 3 Table 2-3 Section 2 Fees: Eastern Dublin/Dublin/Contra Costa Count /Develo er Res onsibilit Percent Responsibility due to New Development Cost by Juridiction ($1,000s) Contra Se ment/Im rovement Eastern Costa Cost Dublin Dublin Coun lwarrmore Pleasanton Estimate Eastern Contra Costa Dublin Dublin Coun Livermore Pleasanon Dublin Boulevard 96% 4% 0% 0% 0% $9,169 $8,802 $367 $0 $0 $0 Village Parkway to Southern Pacific Right-of-Way Scarlett Drive 96% 4% 0% 0% 0% $8,314 $7,981 $333 $0 $0 $0 Dublin eoutevard lb Dougherty Road (4 lanes) Dougherty Road 31% 3% 66% 0% 0% $8,871 $2,750 $266 $5,855 $0 $0 Contra Costa County to i-580 I-580 Fallon Road/EI Charro 39% 0% 5% 43% 12% $12,425 $4,846 $0 $621 $5 343 $1 491 Interchange , , I-580/Airway Boulevard i~% 0% 1% 84% 0% $7,942 $1,191 $0 $79 $6 67t $0 Interchange , subtotal of Costa (St,ooos) $46,721. $25,570 $965 $6,556 $12,014 $1,491 Total Daily Tripa 344,078 Coat per Trip $74 East )ublin Traffic Impact Fee Update age 4 t Table 2-4 Section 3 Fees; Tri-Vatiey Jurisd(ct(on Responsibility Percent Responslbllity due to New Development Se rnent/ 9 Easlem contra Costa Improvement Dubnn Dublin County livertnore Pleasanton San Ramon Danville i-580/1-680 Interchange ~' I Project' 24% 11% 2% 13% 28% 15% 3% I ~ I-580 ~ Auxiliary Lanes 13% 6% 2% 65% 14% t)% 0% I State Route i 84 8% 4% 1% 76% 11% 0°(° ~ 0% Improve ~~ Transit Service 26% 1 % 19% 35% 17% ' 1 % 1 Subtotal of costa ($1,000x) Cost by Jurldlctlon (S1,000s) Contra Cosl Easlem Costa aimate Dublin Dublin _County ~Ivermore Pleasanton San Ramon DanvlUe $5,548 $1,332 $595 $138 $704 :$1,563 $805 5172 $37,000 $4,810 $2,220 $740 $24,050 $5,180 SO SO $9,000 $720 $360 $90 $6,840 5990 SO 50 yio,cw y4,Yl"L ~ttiC $3,U1t3 $5,87U $2,754 $162 $162 SR7 7dp S11 NA M'a97 QA AAA MY NeA f,n .ems tnr~ .~~. ~_. ,, ._ • •,~• ~ w,w~ ~Y,v~e~ ~or,eu~t ~w,yor ~yU/ JJJ4 Total belly Trips ~ 344,078 Cost per Trip S32 Notes: `i-580/1-880 responsibility based on data from Alameda County Traffic Authority (11/95). Percentages do not total 100 percent since Alameda County responsibility Is not listed. Alameda County's share is $241,900. Easlem Dublin Tratf~ Impact Fee Update Page 5 Table 2-5 Summa of Tees for all i nree sections Total Cost of Cost per Non- . Im rovements Residential Tri Section 1 Fees $85,351,314 $248 Eastern Dublin Responsibility 100 Percent Section 2 Fees $25,570,473 $74 Eastern DubliNDubliNContra Costa County/ Developer Responsibility Section 3 Fees $11,073,592 $32 Tri-Valley Jurisdiction Responsibility Total Applied to A[I Uses $121,995,379 $354 Other Improvements (Residential Uses Only) Park-and-Ride Lots $1,716,OOD Tassa'ara Creek Bic cle Path $1,397,760 * The Traffic Impact Fee per residential trip is shown on Table 2-6. Non-residential development is responsible for 60.99 percent of the total applied to all uses (0.6099 X $121,995,379}. R Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update Page 6 ,~-. Tabte 2-fi Catcutation of T{F Cost per Residential Unit ~A Residential Share of Total Trips = Residential + Parfc + School Trips / Total Trips 134,227 / 344,078 = 39.01 ~B Residential Share of Cost for Sections 1, 2, and 3 = (A X Cost for Sections 1, 2, and 3} 39.01 % X $121,998,379= $47,591,168 Cost of Improvements Funded Exclusively by Residential Development =Park-and- Ride Lots +Tassajara Creek Bicycle Path $1,716,000+ $1,397,760 = $3,113,760 Total Funded by Residential Development = B + C $3,113,760 + $47,591,168 = $50,704,928 Cost per Residential Trip = D /Residential Trips $50,744,928 / 121,232 = $418.25 Cost per Low Density (1-6 DUTAcre) Dwelling Unit = $418.25 X 10 = $4,182 Cost per Medium Density (7-14 DU/Acre) Dwelling Unit = $418.25 X 10 = $4,182 ~ Cost per Medium/High Density (15-25 Du/Acre) Dwelling Unit = $418.25 X 7 = $2,928 ® Cost per High Density (> 25 DU/Acre) Dwelling Unit = $418.25 X 6 = $2,509 R Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update Page 7 SANTIN~ T11O~PS~IV,INC. ~--~ Muniapal Engineering Surveying Railroad Engineering Planning January 3 , 1996 (revised ) Mr. Mehran Sepehri CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Re: EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE STUDY ROADWAY COST ESTIMATES, INITIAL LEVEL Dear Mehran: As requested, we have attached cost estimates and supporting documentation for the development of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program. The Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) cost estimates present a cost per lineal foot for 100 percent of the improvement work for each roadway segment. The TIF portion of the cost was frequently not 100 percent of the improvement cost. A portion of the funding for some segments will be provided by future developers as their contribution for .frontage improvements. We derived the percentages for each FUNDING TYPE, (i.e., traffic impact funding or developer funding for frontage improvements) by allocating each cost estimate item to a funding source and then summing the cast estimate items to fmd an overall percentage allocation for each roadway segment. The resulting allocation was very close to what would be obtained by merely taking the total cross sectional width and then ratioing by the cross sectional lengths for each funding type shown on the attached cross sections. For simplicity, we did ~ not include documentation regarding the allocation percentage. The supporting documents are presented in three sections. The first section contains the TIF cost estimates for each roadway segment. The second section contains cross sections for each segment of the roadways as well as the cut off line for each funding type. .1355 Willow Way, Suite 280 510-827-3200 ~ ~ Concord, California ~ ' '' ~{ Fax 510-687-1011 ~ • Mr. Mehran Sepehri January 3, 1996 r..r~' Page Two The third section contains a cost breakdown for each roadway segment. The cost breakdown presents the cost for each item of work as well as a cost per lineal foot for each item. The cost per lineal foot is presented for comparison purposes. The cost breakdown was reduced to a total cost per lineal foot for each roadway segment and then rounded up or down for an ultimate cost per lineal foot. Until a plan line is established for the roadway network, the approximate cost per lineal foot represents an appropriate cost to be used for these initial level estimates. The cost ! per lineal foot number was used in combination with the funding allocation percentage and the ~ length of roadway to obtain the dollar .amount that is presented in section one of this report. Supporting documents for the cast estimates for land values have not been included in this report, but are on file in the City of Dublin. Contra Costa County developers may he required to contribute money to the TIF program as a result of their traffic impacts to the roadway network. The City of Dublin is currently. negotiating with Contra Costa County regarding this issue. The TIF program amounts may require adjustment as a result of these negotiations. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. ,, Sincerely, /, / i ~ l ~~~ Paul E. Hardy Principal phlduht960I04 SANTINA~ THOMPSONINC. Dougherty Road -Segment 1 4300 feet, 118 Right-of-Way City Limits to Amador Valley (Widening) 1!2 Improvements Exist. Sawcut and Extend Totals for T{F Share Civil Improvements at 5540 per LF @ 100% 52,322,000 Intersection Improvements w! right of way J Amador Valley, 3 legs; Willow, 3 legs (Civil improvements are minor} 5400,000 Right-of-Way ( None SO City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% J 5544,400 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) j 53,538,600 Dougherty Road -Segment 2 4,250 feet, 118 Right-of-Way Amador Va{ley to Houston Place (Widening) 1/2 {mprovements Exist. Sawcut and Extend J Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 5540 per LF @ 100% ~ 52,295,000 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way J None, see segment 21 ~ SO Right-o~-Way @ 100% ' 8 x 710 x 518, Southern Pacific Right-of--Way ~ 5102,240 500 x 38 x 518, near Houston Place J 5342,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5547,848 Tota! with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) j 53,561,Oi2 Dougherty Road -Segment 3 Right Hand Turn Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard (900`) Right Turn Pocket Oniy; All Other Improvements Are Done ~ Totals for Tlr Share Civil Improvements, 900' at 5150 per LF @ 100°I° j 5135,000 Right-of-Way, 140 x 8 x 518 @ 100% ~ 520,160 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way, see segment 6 j SO City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% j 531,032 Total with 10% Continoency (0 on Admin.) j 5201,708 0231E.XLS Pa°e 1 Dougherty Road- Segment 4 520 feet Dublin Boulevard to North of 1-580 Off-Ramp Widen Roadway Totals €orTIF Share Civil Improvements, Lump Sum @ 100% ~ 5207,480 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way, see segment 6 Sp Right-of--Way, Lump Sum; Including Demo 51,000,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 5241,496 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.} 51,569,724 Dougherty Road Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange} 58,871,044 (Note that the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County are responsible for that portion of Dougherty Road from the City Limits north to Old Ranch Road) Dubtin Boulevard- Segment 5 2,200 feet, 108 Right-of-Way, 6 Lanes East of Village Parkway to Sierra Court (Widening) As Submitted to Caltrans Totals for T1F Shs Civil Improvements at 440 per Linear Foot @ 1 DO% ~ 5968,DG. lntersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ Clark Modification ~ 5120,000 Sien-a Ct Modification ~ 5120,000 Bridge Widening ~ 5400,D00 Right-of--Way and Demo; have 100, need 108, 518 @ 100% ~ 5316,800 City Administration, Design, Construction Manaoem~nt, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5384,860 Total with 10°~ Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 52,502,240 51 Million Credit for 1STLA Contribution ~ ~ (51,000,000} Net Total for this Segment ~ 51,502,240 `.rr~' 0231 B.XLS Page 2 _ ~-- Dublin Boulevard, Segment 6 2,030 feet, 108 Right-of-Way, 6 Lanes Sierra Court to Dougherty Road (Widening) Future Improvements Witl Be Similar to Segment 5 Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 300 per Linear Foot @ 100% $609,000 Intersection Improvements w! right of way Sierra Ct, Civic -Modification ( 5130,000 Dublin Court -Modification $130,000 Dougherty with Civil Improvements 5758,080 _ Right-of-Way, 8.518+100K demo @ 100% ~ 5392,320 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 5403,880 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.} ~ 52,625,220 Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 7 2,000 feet, 8~ Lanes Dougherty to Southern Pacific R'sght-af-Way Totals for TIF Share Civil improvements of 5510 per Linear Foot @ 50% ~ 5510,000 Right-of-Way, 50%'126'2000'57, (Developer to receive R of W credit) ~ 5882,000 BART Loan of 52.938M, to be repaid with T1F funds ( 52,938,000 Signals with Other Street, see Segments 6 & 21 ~ 50 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0%; 0% on Loan ~ 5278,400 Total with 10% Contingency, including loan (0 on Admin.) ~ 55,041,400 Dublin Boulevard Subtotal (to Southern Pacific Right-of--Way) ~ 59,168,860 Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 8 2100 feet, 6 Lanes From Southern Pacific Right-of--Way to East BART Access (40 feet of roadway section exists) R - J Totals for TIF Share Civil improvements at 650 per lineal foot @75%, Camp Panics wil( not contribute ~ 'S1,D23,750 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way East and West Bart Access, 7 Pegs + 5783,818 Amold Road Intersection, New, 4 legs ~ 5442,058 Right-of-Way, 128`57 @ 75%, (City does not own R of W} ~ 51,389,150 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5727,755 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 54,730,408 X231 B.XLS Page 3 Dublin Boulevard Extension, Segment 8A 2700 feet, 6 Lanes East BART Access to Hacienda Drive A1I new Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 800 per lineal foot @50% 51,080,000 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way Hacienda, New, Major, 4 legs 5442,058 Right-of--Way, 126'57 @ 50%+ 100% of 200K demo, incl. pavement. j 51,390,700 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 5582,552 j Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.} j 53,786,585 Dubtin Boulevard -Segment 9 4,600 feet, 6 Lanes Hacienda to Tassajara Road (40 feet of roadway section exists} j Totals forTlF Share Civil Improvements at 5510 per lineal foot @ 50% j 51,173,000 intersection Improvements w/ right of way ( Tassajara New, Major, 4 legs j 5442,058 Bridge, 580'60W'100L, 1/2 bridge exists; TIF=100% at ACFC channel ~ 5480,OC~^ Right-of-Way, 126'57 @ 50%+ Ok demo, (City does not own R of W) j 52,028,6L City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ( 5824,732 Total with 10% Continoency (0 on Admin.) ~ 55,360,755 J Dubtin Boulevard -Segment 10 6,200 feet, 6 Lanes Tassajara Road to Fallon All New Roadway Included j Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 800 per lineal foot @ 50% '~ J S2,480,000 intersection Improvements w/ right of way _ J Fallon -New, Major, 4 legs J 5442,058 Right-of--Way, 126"57 @ 50% + Ok demo { 52,734,200 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% j S1,131,252 Tota! with 10% Continoency (0 on Admin.) J 57,353,135 ~`' 023~B.XLS Page 4 . ~ ri~ ~~~ Dublin Boulevard Extension -Segment 11 9,350 feet, 6 Lanes Fallon Road to Airway All New Roadway Included Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 800 per lineal foot @ 50% ~ 53,740,000 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way Airway Boulevard, Major, 4 legs ~ 5442,058 Bridge, S80`120W`100L J 5960,000 Right-of-Way, 126`57 @ 50% + Ok demo ~ 54,123,350 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 51,853,082 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) J 512,045,030 Dublin Boulevard Extension Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange) ~ 533,275,915 (The City of Dublin received 5573,000 from State of California (SB3D0 funds) and 5400,000 from the City of Pleasanton for roadway improvements from the Southern Pacific R of W to Tassajara Rd.) -973,000 (The City of Dublin borrowed 52,408,955 from the City of Pleasanton to build the 40 ft. width of Dublin Blvd Extension from SPRW to Tassajara Road; This loan must be repaid.) 2,408,955 Subtotal is therefore I 534,711,870 Freeway Interchange - Segment '12 Dublin Boulevard Extension with I-580 - (Airway Boulevard) ~ Totals for T!F Share Civil Improvements, New 3 lane Bridge & Ramps ~ 55,372,744 Signal Modifications J 5200,000 Right-of--Way ( 5100,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ( 51,134,549 Total wi#h 20% Contingency (0 on Admin.} - J 57,941,842 Hacienda -Segment 73 'I600 feet, 6 Lanes 1-580 (Not including interchange} to Dublin Boulevard Extension (60 feet of roadway section exists) ~ Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 640 per linear foot @ 40% ~ 5409,600 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ 50 Right-of-Way, 126`57.00 @ 5D% + Ok demo ~ 5705,600 City Administration, Desian, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5223,040 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 51,449,760 0231B.XLS Page 5 . Hacienda -.Segment 14 - 3100 feet, 4 Lanes Gleason to Dublin Boulevard Extension All New Roadway Included Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 650 per linear foot @ 38% 5765,700 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way Transit Spine, Major 5392,574 Gleason, Major 5366,720 Right-of-Way, 102 ft.(1700 ft @ 53 8~ 1400 ft @ 54.55)+100k demo, all at 38% ( 5482,577 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 5401,514 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) 52,609,843 Hacienda Road Subtotal (Without Freeway Interchange) 54,059,603 Freeway Interchange -Segment 15 Hacienda Road with 1-580 Widen Offramp and Modify Signal (Loan amount built prior) Totals for TIF 5ha~ Civi! Improvements, Ramps Signal and intersection Improvements ~ 5170,6,; 5150,OL.. Alameda County 53.762 M Loan (Including Interest) f 53,762,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0%; (0% on Loan) ~ 564,000 Total with no Contingency. ~ 54,146,000 Arnold Drive -Segment 1 f 3,100 feet, 4 Lanes Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason (Camp Parks is on one side of Roadway) Improved on each side of Existing Roadway (widened about CL) ~ Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 650 per linear foot @ 69% ~ 51,390,350 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ Gleason & Transit Spine, 3 legs each ~ 5567,316 Right-of-Way, 102 ft.(1700 ft @ 53 & 1400 ft @ 54.55) at 69% + 100k demo @ 100% ~ 5907,259 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ( 5572,985 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) 53,724,402 0231B.XLS Page 6 -~- :i Transit Spine -Segment 16A 1,600 feet, 4 Lanes Hacienda to Arnold Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 655 per linear foot @ 38% ~ 5398,240 intersection Improvements w/ right of way Future Road, 4 legs 5392,574 Right-of-Way, 106`54.55 + 100k demo, all at 38% ~ 5331,238 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 5224,410 Total with 10% Contingency (0 an Admin.} ~ 51,458,668 Transit Spine -Segment 17 4,500 feet, 4 Lanes Hacienda to Tassajara All New Roadway Totals for T1F Share Civil Improvements at 655 per linear foot @ 38% ~ 51,120,050 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ 50 Bridge, 580*96W 100E 5768,000 Right-of-Way, 106`54.55 + 5100k demo, all at 38% ~ 5862,733 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5550,357 Total with 10% Gontingency (0 on Admin.) i 53,576,018 Transit Spine -Segment 18 ~ 3,200 feet, 4 Lanes Tassajara to Fallon (Western Portion) ~ All New Roadway ! ~ Totals for TIF Share Civillmprovements at'655 per linear foot (i ft grading) @ 38% ~ ( 5796,480 Intersection lmprovements w/ right of way ~ 50 Right-of--Way, 106 ff. @ 54.55+100k demo, all at 38% ~ 5624,477 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5284,191 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 51,847,244 Page 7 i Transit- Spine -Segment 18A 3,200 feet, 4 Lanes ~ Tassajara to Fallon (Eastern Portion) A1I New Roadway ~ Totals for T1F Share Civil Improvements at 730 per linear foot (6 ft grading} @ 38% ~ 5887,680 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ SO Right-of--Way, 106 !f. @ 54.55+100k demo, all at 38% ~ 5624,477 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5302,431 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 51,965,804 Transit Spine and Arnold Drive Subtotal ~ 510,724,892 Gleason -Segment 19 1,600 feet, 4 Lanes Arnold Rd. to Hacienda 1/2 Improvements Exist. Sawcut and Extend ~ Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 425 per linear foot~@ 30% ~ 5204,00 Intersection Improvements w! right of way ~ Right-of--Way, 102'53 @ 38% ~ 5186,048 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 578,010 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 5507,062 Gleason -Segment 19A 4,60Q feet, 4 Lanes Hacienda to Tassajara 112 Improvements Exist. Sawcut and Extend '. ~ Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 425 per linear foot @ 30% ~ 5586,500 Intersection improvements w/ right of way ~ SO Bridge.580'S5W 100E ~ 5440,000 Right-of--Way, 102'53 @ 38% ~ ~ 5534,888 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5312,278 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 52,029,804 023'1 B.XLS Page 8 7 { :, :, .; .; :~ i • Gleason -Segment 20 5,100 feet, 4 Lanes Tassajara to t=anon All New Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements of 750 per linear foot @ 38% 51,453,500 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way 50 Right-of--Way, 102'53 @ 38% 5593,028 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 5409,306 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.} 52,660,486 Gleason Roadway Subtotal 55,197,353 (Note the portion of Gleason Road from Fallon Road to Doolan Road is not included because no development is proposed for Dooian Canyon as part of the Dublin General Plan Amendment) Scarlet Drive -Segment 21 2,600 feet, 4 Lanes Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard Extension Ati New Roadway ~ Totals for TIF Share Civil lmprovements at 650 per linear foot @ 100% ( 51,690,000 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ 50 Dougherty, Major, 3 legs ~ 5450,458 Dublin, Major, 3 leas ~ 5328,138 Railroad Utilities, demo and/or relocation ~ 52,D00,000 Bridge, 580'90W'100L I 572D,OD0 Right-of--Way, 102'54.55 ~ 51,206,660 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 51,279,051 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin,) ~ 58,313,833 Tassajara Road -Segment 22 5,800 feet , 6 Lanes 5000 ft north of Gleason to Contra Costa Co. line A(1 New Roadway Totals forTlF Share Civil Improvements at 800 per linear foot, (3 ft. grading) @25% (CCCo pays portion) S 51,160,000 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ 5D Falcon, 3 leas ~ 5275,040 Two Bridges, 120W''100L'S80'2 ~ Si,920,00D Right-of-Way, 126 Lf. @ 53 @ 25%+5500,OD0 for relocation of 2 houses ~ 51,048,100 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 588D,628 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ) 55,724,082 02318.XLS Page 9 . Tassajara Road -Segment 22A s 5,000 feet, 6 Lanes Gleason to 5000 ft. north of Gleason All New Roadway i r ~ Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 800 per linear foot, (3 ft. grading) @25% (CCCo pays portion) ~ 81,000,000 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way 80 Gleason ,see segment 23 ~ 80 Right-of-Way, TIF portion exists. 80 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% !f 8200,000 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 81,300,000 Tassajara Raad -Segment 23 2,600 feet, 6 Lanes Gleason to Dublin Boulevard A[I New Roadway Civil Improvements at 775 per linear 1 Intersection Improvements w/ right of Transit Soine. 4 leas ~ Totals for TIF Share ft. grading) @25% (CCCo pays portion) ~ 5503,750 5C' ~ 5392.574 Gleason ,Major, 4 legs ~ 5366,720 Right-of-Way, 126 ft.(1200 ft @ 83 & 1400 ft @ 54.55); TIF portion exists. ~ 50 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 8252,609 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 81,641,957 Tassajara Road -Segment 24 . 1000 feet, 8 Lanes Dublin Boulevard Extension to 1580; (not including Interchange) Portion of Existing Pavement Usable All New Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 150 per linear feet and 100% (cost to upgrade TIF portion) ~ 5150,OD0 Intersection Improvements w/ right of way ~ 80 Right-of-Way, 15D'S7; TIF portion exists ~ SO City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 530,OOD Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 5195,D00 Tassajara Road Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange .,-,.,. o ..~ Page 10 i Tassajara Road -Segment 25 at Freeway Intersection Freeway Interchange 112 of interchange Exists Totals for T1F Share Civil Improvements, Including new 4 lane Bridge ( 56,416,372 Signalized intersection ~ 5300,000 Right-of-Way gp City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 51,343,274 Total with 20% Contingency (0 on Admin.) 59,402,921 Falcon Road -Segment 26 14,000 feet, 6 t_anes Tassajara to Dubtin Boulevard Extension All New Roadway Totals for TIF Share Civil Improvements at 900 per linear foot @ 25% (CCCo contributes) ~ 53,150,000 intersection improvements w/ right of way Gleason, 3 legs ~ 5275,040 Transit Spine, 3 Pegs 5292,276 Right-of--Way, 126 ft (12,200 ft @ 53 & 1800 ft @ 54.55) @ 25% ~ 51,410,885 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 51,025,640 Total with 10% Contingency, (O on Admin.) ~ 56,666,669 Fallon Road -Segment 27 1,500 feet, 6 lanes Dubtin Boulevard Extension to North of 1-580 Afl New Roadway Totals for TIF Share Givi1 Improvements at~800 per linear foot @ 25% (CCCo contributes) ~. ~ 5300,000 Intersection Improvements wl right of way See Segment TM10 ~ SO No Freeway interchange or Freeway Sionals ~ SO Rioht-of-Way, 126'57 @ 25% ~ 5330,750 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% ~ 5126,150 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) I 5819,975 Fallon Road Subtotal (without Freeway Interchange) ~ 57,486,636 02316.XLS Page 11 a on - reeway n erc ange wi igna s - egmen Totals for TIF Share Freeway Interchange, new 6 lane Bridge 58,475,070 Signals ~ 54D0,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 51,775,014 Total with 20% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ~ 512,425,098 Tassajara Creek Bike. Path -Segment 29 12,800 feet ~Dubiin Boulevard Extension to Contra Costa County Line Totals for TIF Share Bike path, 12 ft. @ 57/sf @ 100% , 51,075,200 Right of Way, none; included with Tassajara of Creek Improvements 5p City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% 5215,040 Total with 10% Contingency (0 on Admin.) ( 51,397,760 Park 8~ Ride 40,000 s.f. for 150 cars Totals for TIF Sh; East of Tassajara, 40,000 s.f. @'(54 Improv. & 57 right of way) ) 5440,000 East of Hacienda, 40,000 @ (54 Improv. ~ 57 right of way) ~ 5440,000 East of Fallon, 40,000 @ (54 Improv. & 57 for right of way) ~ 5440,000 City Administration, Design, Construction Management, ROW Acquisition, 20.0% , 5264,000 Total with 10% Contingency {0 on Admin.) ~ ~ 51,716,000 Precise Ptan Line Costs ' Totals for TIF Share Total Cast - ~ 5451,000 t ~ Grand Total ~ 5134,875,751 --_- `rr~' o231B.XLS Page 12 __.^--- _~ _---- ~~. '~ .__ _. __ .. ~. _ _ o~ GI~.ER'~~ ~,OA~ SF~GM~HT ROADWAY ESTI~dA'PE CI'T'Y OF DUI3LIH EXISTING ~_,.,~ NEB TO REMAIN SEGMENT 3 DOUGHERTY ROAD • HOUSTON PLACE TO DUBLIN BLVD. RIGHT TURN POCKET' ONLY ROADWAY ESTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN ,~ n~G. DEMa. -. 12' NER l la~ x~ ~ T ~' ~G ~ ~~G TO ~~ -~-~~,~~ ROAD -RAC' 4 ~ ~~ G . TO NORTH I-5q0 ~~ SEGMENT DUI3LSN RL'VD ROAD'~AY ES~~ ~ Gay OF ,...... ' ~ •, ~ ~,A,.S~ //~,/\~ fib/ ffj'1 /J `~t r~ i . .f / Q /:tr~c i ~r' r. /' ~!, ~ ~ ,ra.Y.....,,,i f ,~, .,\ ..\ ~\ i ~ ": ,,\~ t 4 •~2~" ~ ...,~ ,,.... ,(~'; ~> l '; t ;~ i. /' i ,`J sEC~ExT 4 ~i DOUG~I~RTY ROAD DUDLTN DLYD. TO NORTIi I-5DO OFF-RA1iI' ~~ -r_-~; " rj.~:.. ~ , •` ~ •~ 7 . ~~ \ .:~ ~ti _,.--= t „t,. ~.. i:l\ \• ; t:`i `~ ,~ ~~i '~i % , ~~ ~~. /•"~. /~~ ' . ROAD'~AY ES9'TMATE CI'T'Y OF DUDLIN t ---'-_-~'- l __ __ __ ~ FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT ROADWAY ES"17MATE CI'I'V OF DUBLIN FRONTAGE ~' IMPROYEMEN'r DUBL~~ BLVD ~,L,AGE pARK1fAY TO SIERRA ~' ~E~G SEGMENP 5 I~[pROVk~ ' ROADWAY ESTndATE CTl'Y flF DUBLIN ~+,iV 1 B~vD. ~x~~NS~o~ ~ ,~ Dt~BLIN SEGI[E ~~~ Og ~g DUBLIN BLVD. s~cx~' 13 HACIENDA ROADWAY ESTIMATE ~y OF DUHLZN a _.--- x ~Ra~,~Nr x ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~8~~N BL 1~ ~- ~ ~ sEG~ ~~' ~ ~~A~ 22 23 SEGId~T ~' F.+ ~,o~ ~°~ 6 ~~ F ~L ~ Y E~~~' gEGI~ ~ gOAD~A UBI~ GTr`j 0~ D ,,.,...- _...~,_' - _. _ _ _. - G.~~-~--'""'"". -~ SEGO` 1 ~EGMEL3'r ~~ ~t 1~ ~~~~ ~ sC~~~~ ~EG~~ ~ ESTIMATE R ~ TyAOF pU~1,IN '~~~'_s= x X FRpg AGEV! ,~,~ UPI' FR AGE p~pRDYEI~NT ~ ~~,~4LD ~T~ . s~G ~- RpADRAY D ~TE ~y OF ~l l `~ FRONTAGE Tb~IPROVE~NT 106' R/~ 12' 7' T 12' ALL I NEW TIF 12' ~,4' 0' 1 ~ix~ 1~ FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT ~,~ 6a 17 18 S~ TRANSIT SPINE R CITY AOF DUB NE Rete~d~ b/~/R sEG?,d~'r ~-~ ,~sT p~ xA~~A To xA~~~~ 1500 9 GLEA~ON 5EGldEK'~ Rp~~AY ~~ CITY ~F D __~ ~5Q' Rte _--~~"~-12g' ~C~FG ,~~~ 12' 1~' ~ zo' ~ ~ ~-- _-- ~y_I ~o fiIF ~ --'"--~ GE FRO ,,. ~pgOV~~~ .~~ -~o ~~ ~~~~~~~ SEG~E~ ~0' !s ~p~AGE ~,~RQ~~ENT RO~~AY ES~~ G'1~`t a' ~~~ ~- ~~, - ii ii ii ii ii ii i ., i i j i ii ii i ii ii ,~ t r ~~ ~~ TYPICAL ROAD1fAY INTERSECTION CITY OF DUBLIN l ~~,~na ,~,~~,s~ ~~~. ,.~4 ,..i _ - -_ __ b` ~fi Y-- ~~'~ ~l E ~~~'~'tt''v~M..e.na~v, v„'4 wtf ~^. T.n.•1<~~~iSiT ~ ~ .... •. ~!"Y.~i, l:.~~ "v~'~)Y,,Y,~.:h:»i:'.`Z+~~{ ~~; .......v.,::. l FFFF~~~~~"~~~~~ V~ ~ ~~~`~~~~~y~ ~~ 15 ~ u t-CIEND~A ~ sg$? ' ~ ~.~ ff '' ' ` i. £x ~ ~ tf S t. ~~ fe ~ ~~µ R ~ N~1 ;jj ~ ~ ~~.n, K e~;..~r~;. .,... f. ..,. ... _ _ _. ~.m ... .k.,, ...yt n.,i 4`~ t .. *..i ..A ~ ~~'~ , t . ~"{ • .S # ie b.. ~#: ~: ;~ ,: i.~ ~.~ . 4 f i 2 ~: sF~ r ____--- ESTII~'I"~ DUBLIN N S:AfHi.... ................~- ~..N ,n ir..u M`.N~.N^~ ....n~.~n•.....~ ~.,.~~,a F; ,,.. ~~.>• ~ .I t.» ..............w............................................................w,... rs: L .r....>m>it. ..tY.....<. <;SSi'h8........_.~~szt:....srr.,...µss>. w~~~^ _ - .~. ,,, '+~ "'. ~,~ ~ ,nom, ~~ 1~j SEGMEN'P ~ ~~ 25 FWY INTERCHANGE t rASS~rARA I;oAD .~ 4 ~ ~. `~. ~~ , ~~ ~4~:~~ n ~ ~, _.... -~ , i~ ....v.~iC`„.. ..... :m:x sza;.:.,.. ..„.$._ 1' ROADIYAY ESTIMATE CITY OF DUBLIN ~?,',~~y... y, N9 DEMOLISH EXISTING 3 LANES BUILD 4 LANE INTO EXISTING 3 LANES. .,, M.q~~ ~ ~. 9~~ z ~~~s¢ w $ . ~~g~~ DEMOLLSH EXISTING INSTALL 6 LANE IIVfiE'lZCHANGE SEGMENT ~: A 28 FWY INTERCHANGE a ~~`~~ w~`:y~-~~~~ .. FALCON ROAD ~~* ~ ROAD1fAY ESTIMATE ,t' ! h CITY IUBLIN ,~ ,.~ _ _ ~-- ~ l _ ~ ~5 4 ~~~7 .~ ~ ty i ~ ~' 1 / -~ ~~l v ~~~ \ ~ ~~' .I ' /~ ~.~ •t i' '' 1 22 ~ 3.1.b < I l y..~ ~ • i San ot'r, r , I ' I8~ 1 (. ~~ ~ s.oo . Vilt ~ ~~• ~4 A•, P Ip g ~ r~/ ~ ~. .,-=: I ~r k ..~ . ~ _ ~..1~6 ~ /i . _. O • .. \ ;t / L~ . 1 ~~ n 111\ I~ ~. _ n , _. ,r .!.8~ • L `+ t „® 18. 2 . ,i . • I- ,~ ` 16 ~ ~~ j L g~~' `~1~"8I. ~ ~ ~~ u- q ~= °i I~ ~ r ~ '! `~~- t`°1, 2 •• '°~.~ 21 r I t4 ~ 9 y 23 ~ ~ ~. ~.~ ~6 0 ~ , !1 , ~- - 5 ; ~ 7 ' I d 10 DUBLIN ~ ''C• _ . ! ~ .> /I_': ,~ Y' ; • G 7 .. H 13 I ~ 24 BLVD. / ..., r •- 8 u 27 ........ .... 1 - X11 4 ~ . N ... ~ ~ ~ •. >a - ~ ... ... '•. :. ,,,, -..t /.. .. _.. _ ..-_. a cnxt -.. _ .... ' .r O I r ~~ Q ' i J L ~i I ~, ~. i ,..~ (.~' I ~ t.... . .•~' ~ • tt -'~ sJ 1 ~ I M @. .,,_ ._.... IlM1ULUl,ra G•W I - p ~c I a o `~ S A :N T A' R I T_; A; . N~~R•.•~ ~~ I I v :'M10k1, -•° LEGEND `,..a.,~~,,.~....°....°.~ ....~....~ . j~ _~~. 3 A ~ I T. ~(, -` / ~ 12 SEGMENT N0. _ - '. t ~' ~ • . k~ / w.n 3.00 E~Av_L~5T/$. 7= ~~ ~ • Na ep :I • .. .. .. .. T T. r ,.. ..,. _. I y~ ~ : L~~~)~ r '%Lil'' . y.` ~'' ! . ~"~~ I ~ / "~ , : ~ ~ " TRA C 9l6NAL, QEtJO7E.3 9. LF.~ . .. ~~' / . i:, Dougherty Road, Segment 1; 4300 ft and 118 ft right of way filename=segD1 length= 4300 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total ------------------ Mobilization --------------- 15.00 ------------------------------- 64500.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 64500.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 64500.00 .00 Sawcut 2.00 8600.00 Grind 3.00 12900.00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 Fu[l Pavmt 180.00 774000.00 c~G 1s.oo 64soo.oo 5u 24.75 106425.00 MC 20.00 86000.00 .DO Overlay (63.00 270900.00 .00 Earthwork 12.00 51600.00 .00 CBBSDMN 4.65 20000.00 SD pipe SO.DO 215000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 16.00 68800.OD signs 2.00. 8600.00 .00 Electrl 9.77 42000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 64500.00 Neu utl .00 Exist utl .00 .00 '. L&I 70.00 301000.00 .OD Survey ------------------ 7.44 ---------------- 32000.00 ------------------------------ GRAND TOTAL 2320325.OD COST PER LF 539.61 USE 540/Lf TIF = 100X Dougherty Road, Segment 2; 4250 fL and 778 ft right of way filename=seg02 length= 4250 treated 9/23/94 Price pcr Description Lin Foot Total • Mobilization 75.00 63750.00 traffic Ctl 15.00 b3750.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 63750.00 _ .00 Savcu: 2.00 8500.00 Grind 3.00 12750.00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 Ful[ Pavmt 180.00 7b5000.00 C&G 75.00 63750.00 Su 24.75 105187.50 rc 20.00 a5ooo.00 . .oo "• Avertay 63.00 267750.00 .OD Earthwork 12.00. 57000.00 ~= .OD C~85DHH 4.24 18000.00 SD pipe 50.00 212500.00 .00 ` Strpbmkings 1b.DD 68000.00 signs 2.00 8500.00 .DO " Elec:rl 8.47 36000.00 _ Sig Inter 15.00 b~75D.D0 keu, u:l .00 ~ .xis: u:[ .00 • .DO LbI 70.00 297500.00 .00 Survey b.54 28000.00 • GRAI:D 70TAL 2262437.50 C057 PAR LF 537.0E USA 540/LF 71 F = i DO:: "~~ r • Dougherty Raad, Segment 3; 900 ft; Rt Hand Turn,lloust Pl to Dub. Blvd .-~-- filename=seg03 length= 900 Greeted 9/23/96 Description Unit price Total- riobiliiation 70 9000.00 - Traffic CLl 5 4500.00 Clear 8 Grb 5 4500.00 5aucvt .00 Curb 8 Gutter 15 13500.00 Full Pavmt, 14 ft 4 50400.00 • Import 8 Grading 5 4500.00 CB 8 SD Pipe 50 45000.00 StrpBmkings S 4500.00 signs 1 900.00 Survey 2 7800.00 GRAND 70TAL 138600.00 COST PcR LF 754.00 US_ f's 150/LF TIF = 100X ' Dougherty Raad, Segment 4; Dublin Blvd. to North of 1-580 tilename=5eg04 ltngth= 520 created 12/01/95 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Hobili:ation 20.00 10000.00 Traffic Ctl 9.00 4680.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 7800.00 .OD Sawcut 3.00 1560.D0 Grind 3.00 1560.00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 ' Full Pavmt 9b.00 49420.00 CSG 24.00 12480.00 5u 37.50 195D0.00 MC 20.00 70400.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 ~ .00 ~ Earthwork 24.OD 12480.00 .DO C3&SDHH 10.00 5200,00 SD rips 50.00 2b000,00 ,00 Strpt~mkings 10.00 5200.00 signs 2.50 1300.00 ' .QO Eiectrl 20.00 7D400.00 Sig Inter .00 .00 New utl .00 EXISt L'tI .OO .OD LSI" 5D.00 26000.00 '. .00 Survey 5.00 260D.00 GRAND TOTAL 207480.00 CO57 PcR LF 399.00 U5_ LUHP SUY. 20748D.00 TJF = 100:: ..--~ Dublin Boulevard, Segment 5;.2200 ft end 108 ft right of uay filename=seg05 length= 2200 • created 9/Z3/4G !;o utilities (nev or relocated), sidewalk, maintenance overlay L&I, electroliers, intcrconnect Price per ' Description Lin Foot Total Hobilization 25.00 55000.00 . Traffic C:l 20.00 44000.00 Clear S Grb 15.00 33000.00 Remove & Relocate .DO Exist. Util. 5.00 11000.00 Remove trees,BStop 8.00 17600.00 Earthwork, grding 35.00 77000.00 Grind 3.DD 6600.00 ~~ Full Pavmt 50.00 110000.00 C8G 24.00 52800.00 • ~ SU E 48.00 105600.00 ._ HC 10.00 22000.00 Sawcut 1.50 3300.00 Overlay .00 .00 .00 Earthwork .00 .DO CoSSDHH 18.00• 39600.00 '~ SD pip- 36_DO 74200.00 .00 StrpBmkings E.00 17600.00 signs 2.00 LL00.00 .00 _ ELectrl S.DD i1000.OD Sig Inter 15.00 33000.00 e New utl .00 Exist utl .00 .00 LEI, incl exist 70.00 150000.00 .00 Survey 4.90 10780.00 GRAI:D 707AL 8E7L80.00 CCST P_R LF 403.40 LSE. G40/L r' ~~ TIF = 100X Dublin Boulevard, Segment 6; 2030 ft and 108 ft right of way filename=seg06 length= 2030 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 25.00 50750.00 Traffic Ctl 20.00 40600.00 Clear S Grb 14.00 28420.00 Savcut 1.55 3146.50 Grind .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 Full Pavrrt 50.00 101500.00 GSG 24.00 68720.00 Su 48.00 97440.00 KC ~ 10.00 20300.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 .OD Earthwork, grc~g 25.00 50To0.00 .00 CnBSDF'.H 10.00 20300.00 SD pipe 30.00 60900.00 .OD Strp8mlcings E.OD 16240.00 signs 2.00 4060.00 .00 Electrl 5.00 10150.00 Sig Inter .OD Neu utl .00 Exist utl .00 .DO L&I, incl exist 40.00 E1200.00 .00 Survey 4.93 10000.00 GRAND 70iA1 6~LG76.50 COS7 PER LF 317.48 USE 3DO/LF TIF = lOC~ '~ Dublin Boulevard Ext, Segment 7; 2000 ft and 125 ft right of -+ay - filename=segOT Length= 2000 created 9/23!94 Price pcr Description Lin Foos Total Mobilization 15.00 30000.00 Traffic Ctl 9.00 18000.00 Clear S Grb 7.50 15000.00 Saucut 1.00 2000.00 Grind 1.50 3000.00 Rm ez pavmt 7.14 14285.71 .00 Full Pavrt;t 212.50 425000.00 C&G 12.00 24000.00 SU 24,00 48000.00 MC ~ 20.00 40000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 .oa Earthwork 20.00 40000.00 .00 Cn85DMH 4.29 7E571.43 SJ pips 50.00 100000.00 .00 StrpFankings 19.29 3E571.43 signs 2.41 4820.00 .00 E{ectrl 20.00 40000.00 - Sig Inter 15.00 30000.00 New•u:l .00 '. Exist u:l .DO .00 L&I, incl exist 50.00 100000.00 .00 Survey 5.00 10000.00 GRAhO TOTAL 1001248.57 COST PER LF 500.62 LS=_ 510/LF TIF = 5~x North = CX . South = 50X Dublin Boulevard Ext., Segment 8; 3000 ft and 126 ft ri filename=seg08 length= 3006 created 9/23/94 Price per _ Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 25.D0 75000.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 45000.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 45000.00 .00 Sawcut 2.00 6000.00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .DO Full Pavmt 272.00 816000.00 C&G 24.00 72000.00 Su 49.50 148500.00 MC 20,00 60000.00 .00 Overlay ~ .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 20.00 60000.00 .00 CB85DMH 10.11 30315.79 SD pipe 50.00 150000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 12.00 36000.00 - - signs 2.00 6000.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 60000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 45000.00 New utl .00 - Exist utl .00 i .. .00 '. L&I 70.00 210000.00 .00 Survey 5.00 15000.00 GRAND TOTAL i 1879815.79 ! s COST PER LF 626.61 j USE Sb50/LF fl TIF = 75X FRONTAGE = 25X I Dublin Boulevard Ext., Segment 8A; 1b00 ft and 126 ft r filename=seg08a length= 1600 created 9/23/94 .. Price per Description ------------------ Lin Foot --------------- Total ---------------------- ------------------ Mcbilization --------------- 25.00 ---------------------- 40000.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 24000.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 24000.00 .00 Sawcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt 9.33 14932.21 .00 full Pavmt 340.00 544000.00 C&G 24.00 38400.00 SN 49.50 79200.00 MC 20.00 32000.00 .00 Overlay ~ .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 50.00 80000.00 .00 CB&SDMH 10.11 16168.42 SD pipe 100.00 160000.00 .DO StrpBmkings 16.00 25600.00 signs. 2.00 3200.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 32000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 24000.00 New utl .00 Exist utl .00 .00 L&I 70.00 R 112000.00 .00 Survey 8.42 13473.68 GRAND TOTAL 1262974.32 COST PER LF 789.36 USE 5800/LF TIF = 75X - FRONTAGE = 25X Dublin Boulevard Ext, Segment 9; 4600 ft and 126 ft right of way filename=seg09 length= 4600 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot .Total Mobilization 20.00 92000.00 Traffic Ctl 12.00 55200.00 Clear & Grb 10.00 46000.00 .00 SaWCUt 2.00 9200.00 -~ Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Full Pavmt 240.00 1104000.00 C&G 24.00 110400.00 Su 45.00 207000.00 MC 20.00 92000.00 .00 Overlay ~ .00 .00 Earthwork 20.00 92000.00 -" . 00 CBBSDMH 10.00 46000.00 SD pipe 30.00 138000.00 .00 Strp8~mkings 12.00 55200.00 signs 1.79 8214.29 • .00 Electrl 10.00 46000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 69000.00 Neu utl .00 '" Exist utl .00 _ .00 L81 50.00 230000.00 .00 Survey 5:00 23000.00 GRAND TOTAL 2423214.29 COST PER LF 526.79 USE 5510/LF • TIf = 50X frontage = 25X / 25X `~°t Dublin Boulevard Ext, Segment 10; 6200 ft and 126 ft right of ua filename=segl0 length= 6200 /^ created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 25.00 155000.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 93000.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 93D00.00 .00 Saucut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Full Pavmt 340.00 2108000.00 C&G 24.00 14$800.00 Su 49.50 306900.00 MC 20.00 124000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .QO ~--- .00 ~" Earthwork 50.00 310000.00 .oo C8&SDMH 10.00 62000.00 SD pipe 100.00 620000.00 ,00 StrpBdnkings 16.00 94200.00 signs 2.00 12400.00 ` . 00. ELectrt 20.00 124000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 .93000.00 ' Neu utl .00 __ Exist utl .00 .00 ~ L&I 75.D0 465000.00 .00 Survey 6.61 41000.00 ---------------------- GRAND TOTAL ------------ ------------------------------ 4855300.00 COST PER LF 783.11 US'c 5800/LF TIF = SOX " FRONTAGE = 25X / 25X Dublin Boulevard Ext, Segment 11; 9350 ft arxi 126 ft right of way filename=segll Length= 9350 ~ created 9/23/94 Price per Description ----------------- Lin Foot ---------------- Tota! ----------------------------------- ----------------- Mobilization ---------------- 25.00 ----------------------------------- 233750.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 140250.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 140250.00 .00 Sawcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 _ .oa Full Pavmt 340.00 3179000.00 C&G 24.00 224400.00 Su 49.50 462825.00 MC 20.00 187000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 72.00 673200.00 .00 CB&SDMH 10.00 93500.00 SD pipe 100.00 935000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 16.00 149600.00 signs 2.00 18700.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 187000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 140250.00 - New utl .00 Exist uti .00 ~. .00 L&I 70.00 654500.00 .00 Survey 6.75 63112.50 GRAND TOTAL 7482337.50 COST PER LF 800.25 USE 5800/LF 7IF = 50ti FRONTAGE = 25X / 25X `, i 1 `u/~r .--. ' Interchange, Airway/I-580 filename=seg121 length= 1800 crtated Price per Description Lin Foot Total riobilization 120.D0 215000.60 Traffic Ctl 120.00 216000.00 Clear & Grb 60.00 108000.00 .00 Sawcut 2.DO zoo.oo Grind 10.00 1000.00 Rm eX pavmt .00 Bridge & Clover 55D0.00 2950000.00 full Pavmt 120.00 215600.00 C&G 15.00 108000.OD RAMP 250.00 <50000.00 HC 2D.00 36000.00 ,~ __ PAVc'R 8».00 15I200.OD Overlay .00 .00 EarthWk, taro 100.00 180000.00 Earthwork 2D0.00 359650.00 .OD CnBSDHH 4.65 16744.19 50 pipe 25.00 67500.00 .DO Strp€dnkings 12.00 32400.00 signs 2.00 36DD.D0 .OD Electrl 20.00 72000.00 Sig Inter .OD .00 Nesr,utl .00 ~ Exist u:l .00 ' .DO L8I 60.00 108000.D0 .00 Survey 20.00 72000.00 GRhND T07AL 5353894.19 C057 PER LF L'SE 531 764.00 TIF = 500 ~- Hacienda, Segment 73; 1600 ft and 12b ft right of way t.ilename=segl3 length= 1b00 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 25.00 40000.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 24000.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 24000.00 .00 Sawcut 2.00 3200.00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 full Pavmt 272.00 435200.00 C&G 24.00 38400.00 su 49.50 79200.00 MC 20.00 32000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 20.00 320D0.00 .00 CB&SDMH 10.00 16000.00 5D pipe 45.00 72000.00 .00 StrpBmkings 16.00 25600.00 signs 2.00 3200.00 .00 Etectrl 20.00 32000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 24000.00 Hew utl .00 - Exist utt .00 .00 ~ L&I 75.00 120000.00 .00 Survey --------------------- 6.75 ------------- 10800.00 ------------------------------ --------------------- GRAND TOTAL ------------- ------------------------------ 1011600.00 COST PER LF 632.25 USE Y640/LF TIF = 50X FRONTAGE = 25% / 25% `~° Hacienda, Segment 14; 3200 ft and 102 ft right of uay filename=segl4 length= 3200 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin foot Total Mobilization 20.00 64000.00 Traffic Ctl 12.00 38400.00 Clear & Grb 12.00 38400.00 .00 Saucut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Full Pavmt 244.00 780800.00 C&G 24.00 76800.00 Su 49.50 158400.00 MC 20.00 64000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 ~ .00 Earthwork 19.00 60800.00 .00 ca&SDMH 10.00 32000.00 SD pipe 100.00 320000.00 ,00 Strp&nkings 16.00 51200.00 signs 2.00 6400.00 ` .00 Electrl 20.00 64000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 .48000.00 Neu utl .00 Exist utl ,00 .00 ~ L8~1 70.00 224000.00 .00 Survey 7.00 22400.00 GRAND TOTAL 2049600.00 COST PER LF 640.50 USE Sb50/LF TIF = 38~ FRONTAGE = 31X / 37X • Interchange, Hacienda-1-580 filename=seg151 length= Ramps 2L00 ~. created Price per Description Lin Foo: Total Mobilization L,DO 9600.00 Traffic Ctl 2.50 6000.00 Clear & Grb 2.00 L800.00 .00 SaVCU: 1.00 2400.00 Grind ,00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 lliden Pavm:, Rarb L8.00 115200.00 Rotted curb 8.00 19200.00 SU .00 .OD MC ,OD .00 .00 Overlay .00 .DO .QO Earthwork 6.40 74400.OD .00 Gn&SDMH 1.20 2880.00 SO pipe 1.00 2L00.00 .00 StrpBmkings 2.OD 4800.00 signs .OD .00 E[ectr[ .00 Sig Inter .00 .00 Neu utl .00 Exis: u:l .00 '. .00 L8I ,pp .QO Survey 2.00 L800.D0 GRAND TOTAL 18b=.80.00 COST PER LF US_= LS 170000.00 TIF = 10CX Arnold Drive, Segment 16; 3100 ft and 102 ft right of u filename=seglb length= 3100 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 20.00 62000.00 Traffic Ctt 12.00 37200.00 ' Clear 8~ Grb 12.00 37200.00 .00 Saucut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt 10.00 31000.00 .00 Full Pavmt 244.00 756400.00 C&G 24.00 74400.00 SU 49.50 153450.00 MC 20.00 62000.00 .00 Overlay E .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 21.00 65100.00 .00 CB&SDMH 10.00 31000.00 SD pipe 100.00 310000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 16.00 49600.00 signs 2.00 6200.00 - .00 Elecirl 20.00 62000.00 Sig Infer .00 .00 Neu utl .00 Exist utl .00 .00 R L&I 70.00- 217000.00 .00 Survey ---------------------- 7.00 ------------ 21700.00 --------------------- --- - ---------------------- GRAND TOTAL ------------ -------------- --- 1976250.00 COST PER LF 637.50 USE 5650/LF T1F = 69X FRONTAGE = OX / 31X Transit Spine, Segment 16a; 1600 ft and 102 ft right of way • filename=segl6a length= 1b00 ._, created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin foot Total Mobilization 20.00 32000.00 Traffic Ctl 12.00 19200.00 Clear & Grb 12.00 19200.00 .00 Sawcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Fuil Pavmt 254.00 406400.00 C8G 24.00 38400.00 Su 49.00 78400.00 MC 20.00 32000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 21.00 33600.00 .00 CB&SDMH 10.00 16000.00 SD pipe 100.00 160000.00 .00 StrpBmkings 15.00 24000.00 . signs 2.00 3200.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 32000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 24000.00 New utl .00 Exist utl .00 - .00 L&I 70.00 112000.00 R. .00 Survey 7.00 11200.00 GRAND TOTAL 1041600.00 COST PER LF 651.00 USE 5655/LF TIF = 38X FRONTAGE = 31X / 31X r~° ~,~' . Transit Spine, Segment 17; 4500 ft .and 102 ft right of way ~ filename=segl7 length= 4500 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin foot Total _ Mobilization 20.00 90000.00 Traffic Ctl 12.00 54000.00 Clear & Grb 12.00 54000.00 .00 Sawcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .. .00 Full Pavmt 254.00 1143000.00 C8G 24.00 108000.00 Su 49.00 220500.00 MC 20.00 90000.00 .00 ~"~ ~ Overlay .00 .00 -- .00 Earthwork 21.00 94500.00 .00 CB~SDMH 10.00 45000.00 SD pipe 100.00 450000.00 .00 StrpBmkings - 15.00 67500.00 signs 2.00 4000.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 90000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 67500.00 New utl .00 - Exist utl .00 .00 '. L&I 70.00 315000.00 .00 Survey 7.00 31500.00 GRAND TOTAL 2929500.00 COST PER LF 651.00 USE 5655/LF 7IF = 38X FRONTAGE = 31X / 31X Transit Spine, Segment 18; 3200 ft and 102 ft right of uay • filename=segl8 length= 3200 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foat Total --------------------- Mobilization ------------ 20.00 ------------------------------- 64000.00 Traffic Ctl 12.00 38400.00 Clear & Grb 12.00 38400.00 .00 Saucut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Full Pavmt 254.00 812800.00 C&G 24.00 76800.00 Su 49.00 156800.00 MC 20.00 64000.00 .00 overlay .00 .00 .00 Earths~ork, 1' C/F 21.00 67200.00 .00 CB$SDMH 10.00 32000.00 SO pipe 100.00 320000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 15.00 48000.00 signs 2.00 6400.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 64000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 48000.00 New utl .00 Exist utl .00 .00 L8I 70.00 224000.00 e .00 Survey 7.00 22400.00 GRAND TOTAL 2083200.00 COST PER LF 651.00 USE 5655/LF T I F = 38X FRONTAGE = 31X / 31X Transit Spine, Segment 18A; 3200 ft and 102 ft right of way filename=segl8A length= 3200 '~ created 9/23/94 Price per ~- Description --------------------- Lin Foot ------------ Total ------------------------------- --------------------- ". Mobilization ------------ 20.00 ------------------------------- 64000.00 .. Traffic Ctl 12.00 38400.00 Clear & Grb 12.00 38400.00 .00 Sawcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 - Full Pavmt 254.00 812800.00 C&G 24.00 76800.00 Su 49.00 156800.00 - MC 20.00 64000.00 .00 - Overlay .00 .00 .00 -- Earthwork, 6' C/F 98.00 313600.00 .00 CB&SDMH 10.00 32000.00 SD pipe 100.00 320000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 15.00 48000.00 signs 2.00 6400.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 64000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 48000.00 New utl .00 Exist utl .00 _ .00 _, L8I 70.00 224000.00 ~, .00 .~ Survey 7.00 22400.00 GRAND TOTAL 2329600.00 COST PER LF 728.00 USE $730/LF TIF = 38~ FRONTAGE = 31X / 31Y. Gleason, Segment 19; 4600 ft and 102 ft right of way filename=segl9 length= 4600 • created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 20.00 92000.00 Traffic Ctt 12.00 55200.00 Clear & Grb 12.00 55200.00 .00 Sawcut 1.00 4600.00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt 4.75 21850.00 .00 Full Pavmt 134.00 616400.00 C&G 24.00 110400.00 Su 25.00 115000.00 MC 20.00 92000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 19.00 87400.00 .00 CBBSDMH 4.00 18400.00 SD pipe 50.00 230000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 15.00 69000.00 signs 2.00 9200.00 .00 Electrl .00 .00 Sig Inter ~ 15.00 69000.00 Neu utl .00 Exist utl .00 .00 L8I 65.00 299000.00 ` .00 Survey 5.00 23000.00 GRAND TOTAL 1967650.00 COST PER LF 427,75 USE 5425 TIF = 30X FRONTAGE 9X / 61X °'~' Gleason, Segment 19a; 1600 ft and 102 ft right of way filename=segl9a length= 1600 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 20.00 32000,00 Traffic Ctl 12.00 19200,00 Clear & Grb 12.00 19200,00 .00 Sawcut 1.00 1600,00 Grind .00 ,00 Rm ex pavmt 4.75 7600.00 ,00 Full Pavmt 134.00 214400,00 C8G 24.00 .38400,00 Stl 25.00 40000.00 MC 20.00 32000,00 ,DO Overlay .00 .00 ,00 Earthwork 14.00 30400.00 .00 CB&SDMH 4.00 6400,00 SD pipe 50.00 80000.00 .00 StrpBmkings 15.00 24000,00 signs 2.00 3200,00 .00 Etectrt .00 .00 Sig Inter 15.00. . 24000.00 New utl .00 Exist utl ,00 .00 e L&I 65.00 104000.00 .00 Survey 5.00 8000.00 GRAND TOTAL 664400,00 COST PER LF 427.75 USE 5425 TIF = 30X FRONTAGE = 4X / 61X Gleason, Segment 20; 5100 ft and 102 ft right of way filename=seg20 length= 5100 created 9/Z3/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Totai Nobilixation 20.00 1020DO.OD Traffic Ctl 12.00 61240.00 Ctear S Grb 12.00 612D0.00 ' .00 Saucut .00 .00 Grind .40 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .DO .00 Futl PavmL 2~4.D0 1244400.00 C&G 24.00 122400.00 Su 49.50 252450.00 rc zo.oo 102040.00 .DD Overlay .00 .00 .oo Ear;huork 113.D0 576300.00 .00 Ca'&SDHH 9.68 44354.5: SD pipe i0D.00 510000.00 .00 Strptsnkings 15.00 76500.00 siSns 2.00 10240.00 .00 ~[ectrl 19.35 98709.b8 SiS Inter 15.00 76500.00 - Neu u.[ .00 Exis; utl .00 '. .04 LSI 70.00 357000.00 '.OD Survey 7.OD 35700.D0 GRA-ID TOTAL 3735914.52 CAST PER LF 732.53 QSc 575G/LF 7IF = 38X FROAiAG. = 31x / 3i: ~~ Scarlett Drive, Segment 21; 2600 ft and 102 ft right of way ,,,,~ filename=seg21 length= 2600 created 9/23/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 20.00 52000.00 - Traffic Ctl 12.00 31200.00 Clear 8 Grb 12.00 31200,00 ,00 Sawcut _ .00 .00 Grind .00 ,00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 -- Full Pavmt 244.00 634400.00 C&G 24.00 62400,00 - SW 49.50 128700,00. MC 20.00 52000.00 .00 Overlay .00 ,00 .00 Earthwork 21.00 54600.00 ,00 CS&SDMN 10.00 26000.00 50 pipe 90.00 234000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 14.00 36400.00 - - signs 2.00 5200.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 52000.00 Sig Inter. 15.00 .39000.00 New uti .00 Exist utl .00 -- .00 ~- L8I 75.00 195000.00 .00 Survey 8.00 20800.00 GRAND TOTAL 1654900.00 COST PER LF 636.50 USE 5650/LF TIF = 100X 7assajara Road, Segment 22; 580D ft and 126 ft right of way filename=segZ2 lengths 5800 created 9/Z3/94 Price per Description Lin Foot iotat Mobilization 25.00 145000.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 87D06.D0 Clear 8 Gr6 15.00 87000.00 .DO Sawcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Ful ! Par„it 340.00 1472000.00 CSG 24.00 134200.00 Su 49.50 287100.00 MC 20.00 116000.00 .00 Overizy .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 72.00 417500..00 .QO C38SDMH 10.00 58000.00 SD pipe 100.D0 58DOOD.00 .QO StrpBmkings 16.00 4280fl.00~ signs 2.DD 11500.00 .00 Elec:rl 20.00 11600D.00 Sig Inter 15.00 57D00.00 _ Neu utl .DO ~XISt utL .DD R .OD L8I 70.D0 4D6000.00 .OD Survey 6.75 34150.00 GRAND TOTAL 46:1450.D0 GOS7 PER LF 800.25 USE 5800/LF 7IF 50X FROFTAG~ = 2SX / 25: Tassajara Road, Segment 22a; 5000 ft and 126 ft right of way filcname=seg22a length= 5000 created 9/23/94 Pricc pcr Description Lin Foot Total F:obiliiation 25.00 125000.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 75000.00 Clear S Grb 15.00 T 000.00 .00 Saucut .00 .00 Grind .OD .OD Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Full Pavmt 340.00 1700000.00 G&G 24,00 120000.00 Su. 49.50 247500.00 HL 20.00 10D000.00 • ,•~-- .00 Overizy .00 .00 .00 Earthwork 72.OD 360000.00 .00 Cii85DriH 10.00 SDDOD_00 SD pipe i0D,00 50000D.D0 .00 Str,~mkin5s 16.D0 80000.00 signs 2.00 10000.00 .00 • Electrt ZD.00 ~ 100000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 ?5000.00 Neu utl ,00 Exist utl .00 ~ .oo l8I 7D.oo 35ooao.oo .oo Survey 5.T 33750.00 GRAND TOTAL 4001250.00 . CAST PAR LF 800.25 USE 5800/LF TiF 5DX FRONTAGE = 25~ / 25X ~"'^, Tassajara Road, Scgment 23; 2600 ft and 126 ft right of way filename=seg23 length= 2600 created 9/Z3/94 Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilisation 25.00 65000.00 Traffic Ctl 15.00 39000.00 Clear S Grb 15.00 39000.00 . 00 Sawcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .00 Full Pavmt 340.00 884000.00 C8G 24.00 62400.00 Su 49.50 728700.00 HC 20.00 52000.00 ' .00 Overlay .00 .DO .00 Earthwork 24.00 62400.00 .DO C'o&SOHH 10.00 26000.00 SD pipe 100.00 260000.00 .00 StrpBrnkincs 16.00 ~ 41600.00 ' signs 2.00 5200.00 .00 Electrl ZD_00 52000.00 Sig Inter 15.00 39000.00 _ New utl ,00 Exist utl .00 R .00 L&I 70.00 162000.00 .00 Survey b.T 17550.00 GRAND TOTAL 1955E50.00 COST PER LF T 2.25 USE S7T/ l f 71F = 50~ FRONTAGE = 25~ / 25~ ~I :. lassajara Road, Segment 2<; 7000 ft and 150 ft right of way filename=seg2C length= 1000 created 9!2':94 OhLT Tlf PORTION IS ESTIMATED ' Price per Description Lin Foot Total Mobilization 25x.30 7500.00 Traffic C:l 20x.30 6000.00 Clear L Grb 15x.30 4500.00 _ ,00 Sawcut 4x1.00 4000.00 Grind ,00 Rm ex pavmt 14x1.20 16800.00 .00 Full Pavmt 6x4.00 24000.00 C8G .00 Stt .00 MC 20x1 20000.00 .00 Overlay .00 .00 Earthwork 2fix.05 1680.00 .00 C385AMH 10x.20 2004.00 SD pipe 100x.75 15000.00 .00 Strp&mkings 16x.34 4800.00 signs 2x.30 600.00 .00 Etectri 75x.30 4500.00 Sig Inter 15x30 4504.04 New utl .00 Exis- Ott .00 .00 LSI 70x.50 35D00.00 _ .00 Survey 10x.3D 3000.00 GRAND TOTAL 153880.00 CC57 P'cR LF 153.88 USE 5150/LF Interchange, 7assajara/7-580 filename=seg25J length= 1800 created 2/22/96 Price per Description Lin Foot Totti Mobilization 150.00 270000.00 Traffic Ctl 150.00 270000.00 Clear & Grb 60.00 108000.00 .00 Sawcut 50.09 90000.00 Grind 10.00 18000.00 Rm ex pavmt .00 &?IDLE 6500.00 3900000.00 FuEI Pavmt 225.00 270000.00 C&G 15.00 27000.00 Pavmt Ramp 160.00 216040.00 HC 50.00 90000.00 PAVER SC.00 151200.00 Overlay .00 .00 Earthwork, Rarer 130.00 173500.00 Earthuark .250.00 500000.00 ' .00 C'nESDY,H 5.00 9000.00 SD pipe 25.00 45000.00 .DO + Strp~nkings 16.00 28500.00 signs 4.00 7200.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 36000.00 Sig Inter _00 .00 Neu utl .00 EXiSt Utl .OD .OD L&I 70.00 126000.00 .00 Survey 20.00 63000.00 GRAND TOTAL 6:.00700.00 COST PER LF USE 6L 16372.00 7IF = 1DC~ • Felton Road, Segment 26; 14000 4t and 12b ft right of ~sy .--. filename=5eg26 length= 140D0 created 9/23/94 Price per Description tin Foo; Total Yobiliza;ion 25.00 350000.00 Trattic Ctl 15.00 210000.00 Ciear & Grb 15.00 210000.00 .00 Savcut .00 .00 Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavm; .00 .OD .00 Full Pavnt 340.00 4760000.00 C&G 24.00 336000.D0 SU 49.50 693000.OD HC 20.00 280000.00 .00 __ ~ Overlay .00 .OD .00 Ear;hvcrk 144.00 201b000.OD .00 C88SDHH 10.OQ i4D000.00 ' SD pipe 100.00 1400000.00 .DO - - S;raSankin;s 16.00 2240D0.00: signs Z.00 2$000.00 .DO Elec;rl 20.D0. 280000.OD Sig Inter 15.00 210DDO.OD Nev u;l .00 -- EXls; u;l .OD t .OD L&I 70.00 980000.00 ,00 Survey 6.00 SCOOD,00 GnA1iD TDTAL i22Gi0DD.00 COST P.R LF 871.50 USc S9DD/LF TIF = 50~ FROFTAG~ = Z5~ / 25X i Fallon Raad, segmcnt 27; 1500 tt and 126 ft right of way - filename=seg27 length= 1500 '~ crcatcd 9/23/9L Price per Description Lin Foo; Total nobitiza;ion 25.00 37500.00 Tratfic Ctl 15.00 225DD.00 Clear & Grb 15.00 22500.00 .00 Sawcut .00 .OD Grind .00 .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 .00 .QO Fuli Pavm; 340.00 510000.00 C8G 24.OD 36000.00 S4 49.50 74250.00 Y.C 2D.OD 30000.00 .00 pverlay .00 .OD .DO Earthwork 24:00 3600D.00 .DO C88SDH!? 70.00 15000.00 SD pipe 100.00 15000D.00 .00 ` strpd~mkings 1b.00 24000.00 signs 2.00 300D.00 - .QO Elec;rl 20.00 30000.00 _ Sig Inter 15.00 22500.00 kew u;l .OD ~ Exist u;t .DO .DO LEI 70.00 1050DO.OD .00 survey 6_DO 9000.00 GRARD TOTAL 1127250.00 CD57 PER LF 751.50 USE 5800/LF TSF = 50:: FRDHTAGE = 25~ / 25~ ,~;~ Interchange, Fallon rd/I.580 filename=seg28l length= 2400 created Price ptr Description Lin foot Total riobilization 120.00 288000.00 Tra',tic Ctl 100.00 240000.00 Clear & Grb 60.00 144000.00 .00 Savcut .00 Grind .00 Rm ex pavmt .00 6R10G~ 10000.00 6000000.00 Full Pavmt 300.00 540000.00 C&G 24.00 57600.00 Pavmt Rasrn 128.00 23D4O0.00 NC 20.00 48000.00 PAV'eR 60.00 144000.00 Overlay .00 .00 'earthwork, Rarn~ 80.00 144000.00 ;arthxork 180.00 324000.00 .00 CSfiSDuH 5.00 i200C.00 sD pipe 20.00 48000.00 .Do StrD~ilfkings 16.00 38400.00 signs 2.D0 4800.00 .00 Electrl 20.00 48000.00 Sig Inter .00 .00 Ne+t utl .00 - Exist utl .00 .oo ~. LSI 50.OD 1i440D.00 .00 Survey 12.00 45000.00 GRAND TOTAL SGT 600.00 CAST P.R LF L'S. bGT 070.00 TI r' = 10GX - Park S Ride; <0,000 sf for 150 cars _ filename=seg park area s.f. <0000 created 9/23/9< Description Uniz price Total Mobilization .15 6000.00 Traffic C:l .05 2000.00 Clear 8 Grb .1 <000.00 Sauce: .00 Curb .Z 8000.00 Full Pavm: 2.5 100000.00 Import S Grading .25 10000.00 CS S SD Pip- .5 20000.00 Strp&mkings .15 6000.00 signs .O5 2000.00 Survey .05 2000.00 • GRAND T07AL 160000.00 per site COST PAR SF <.00 L'S. 4/S F TIr = 100 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Property O~i~ners Only 986-2-1-2 986-2-1-1/986-2-2-1 986-2-2-2 Anne G~~gi East Bay Regional Park District Margorie Koller & Carolyn A. Adams X865 Tassajara Rd. 29.50 Peralta Oaks Ct. 5379 Tassajara Rd. Pleasanton, CA 94588 Oakland, CA 94605 Pleasanton, CA 94588 986-2-3 986-1-1-8/986-1-1-9/985-3-3-3 946-4-1 Clyde C. Casterson City of Pleasanton James G. & Sue Tipper 5020 Tassajara Rd. City Clerk 7440 Tassajara Rd. Pleasanton. CA 94588 200 Bernal Ave. Pleasanton, CA 94588 Pleasanton, CA 94566 946-4-2-1 946-4-2-3 946-4-3 .lose L. R .'ioletta Vargas Thomas A. R; Helene L. Fredrick Elvera I. Bragg & Claire Silva 7020 Tassajara Rd. 6960 Tassajara Rd. 646 Donner Dr. Pleasanton, CA 94588 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Sonoma, CA 95476 446-4-5-1/95-3-2/955-3-1-2/985-3-3 ~ 905-1-4-4 985-1-2 Chaney Properties Robert D. & Shirley M. Branaugh Redgwick Construction Company c/o Chang S., Hong.Y., & Hor.~ L. Lin 1881 Collier Cannon Rd. 25599 Huntwood Ave. ",Owens Dr. Livermore, CA 94550 Hayward, CA 94544 nton, CA 94585 985-2-1 985-4-1-2!985-4-1-3 985-2-~-1/985-2-5-2 Mission Peaks Home Inc. john DiManto Michael H. Kobold Qe Road 245 Sinclair Fronta Dublin Land Company 815 Diablo Rd. _ Milpitas CA 95035 1991 Leigh Ann Place Danville, CA 94526 , San Jose, CA 95125 985-2-6-1 985-2-7-1 985-2-8-2 Rodman Scott & Claudine T. Azevedo Albert C. & Beverly A. Haight Ann H. Silveria 6363 Tassajara Rd. 6833 Tassajara Rd. 6615 Tassajara Rd. Pleasanton, CA 94588 . Pleasanton, CA 94588 - R Pleasanton, CA 94588 985-2-9 985-5-1/985-5-2 985-5-3-1 Robert J. Nieison Jr., Michelle Olds, & Lany R. Paoyeh 8: Bihyu Lin V~rilliam L. & May K. Devany R~illiamson c/o Kenny Wan 215 Tim Court P.O. Box 1667 Allwin Development Danville, CA 94526 Lafayette, CA 94549 9657 E. Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, CA 91780 985-6-4 985-6-5 985-6-6-2 Dublin Ltd. William L. & Jean S. Maynard Levins Metals Corporation c/o Teachers Management Inc. 350 Tideway Dr. 1800 Monterey Hwy Dennis B. SchmuckerJ my Alameda, CA 94501 San Jose, CA 95112 1 ~ ~ 0 Second Ave., # 1421 ~^go, CA 92101 ~~ 6 12/20/95 ~~~`" t~~r ~ g:~nailin¢s\e.dublinkplistdoc _ .. .._._ ._. Eactcrn Dublin Gcncral Plan Amendment Arca Future Stud~• .4rea Propcrt~• O~i'ners Onh' 905-I-:--'_!905-1-1-? 905-I ~-2 90>-8-1-6 Bank of tl~c 1~'est Livermore Valley Joint Unified School Disvict Anita S. R Ram S. \'ij, and i:hanna Tcjbir clo Harry Crosby 685 E. Jack London Blvd. 1066 Cross Strings Cord P.O. Box 1121 Livermore, CA 94550 San Jose, CA 95120 San 3ose. C.A 95105 905-5-1-3 905-8-1-7/905-S-I -1 I /905- i- I -I Cit`• of Livermore Irving $. ~ Betty J. Bloom 1052 So. Livermore Ave. 141 \'ia Serena Livermore, CA 94550 Alamo, CA 94507 90>-2-4/90 ~-3-x!905-= -4 905-7-1-~ Dooian East Associates Don R Pavicia Flanigan clo Ted Fairfield 4589 Donlan Rd. , P.O. Box 1148 Livermore, CA 94550 Pleasanton, CA 9;566 90: v-9-2 905-3-3 Jo .4. Shane Trevor J. R Cassandra M. Patterson 5210 Donlan Rd. 5661 Donlan Rd. Livermore. CA 94550 Livermore, CA 94550 905-3-12 905-3-10-2 ' H. 8 Ruth G. MuehJhauscr James 1\. & I~'adine Pestana 1434 Ardmore Dr. 5385 Donlan Rd. San Leandro, CA 94577 Livermore, CA 94550 905-7-2-3 905-3-]4-2/905-3-14-3 Donlan East Associate Donlan VY'est Associates P.O. Box 1 14S P.O. Box I I48 Pleasanton. CA 94566 Pleasanton, CA 94566 905-4-1 Charlotte A. R R_A., $ Aldine J. Bailey 520'Arlinston Ave. Berkeley, CA 94707 R 905-S-I -5 City of Livermore c/o Thomas Cum• 22320 Foothill Blvd. Ha~•v~•ard, CA 94541 905-3-6!905-3-7/905-3-5 Robert & Darlene Steffen 5033 Donlan Rd. Livermore, CA 94550 905v-10-I Charles S. &: Barbara M. Foscalina 5260 Donlan Rd. Livermore, CA 94550 905-3-11 Clarence C. Sih•a 10000 Stillwater Rd. Fallon, NV 59406 "~ 985-7-7 Donlan \~i'est Associates c/o Harold Moller P.O. Box 1145 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment increment Area Property' O«•ners Only 9S5-1-1 Robena S. Moller 6561 Tassaiara Rd. Pleasanton, CA 945SS 9s5-7-?-I4 Fallon Enterprises Inc. 57SJ Fallon Rd. Livermore, CA 94550 905-2-3 David P. Mandeville 4037 Croak Rd. Pleasanton, CA 945SS 905-3-]-I'905-2-2 Francis P. Croak 1362 Gabriel Ct. San l.eandm CA 9477 EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Residential Low Density Dwelling fup to 6 units per acre) Medium Density Dwelling (7-14 units per acre) Medium/High Density Dwelling (15-25 units per acre) High Density Dwelling (more than 25 units per acre) Non-Residential Development Other Than Residential LAND USE (Non-Residential) HOTEL/MOTEL OR OTHER LODGING: OFFICE: Standard Commercial Office Medica{/Dental RECREATION: Recreation Community Center Health Club Bowling Center Golf Course Tennis Courts Theaters: Movie Live Video Arcade EDUCATION (Private Schools): HOSPITAL: General Convalescent/Nursing Clinic CHURCH: INDUSTRIAL: Industrial (with retail) Industrial (without retaiq 54,182/unit S4,182/unit 52,928/unit S2,509/unit S 354/trip ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE* 10/room 20/1,000 sf 34/1,000 sf 26/1,000 sf 40/1,000 sf 33/1,000 sf 8/acre 33/court 220/screen 0.2/seat 96!1,000 sf 1.5/student 12/bed 3/bed 24/1,000 sf 9/1,000 sf R 16/1,000 sf 8/1,000 sf "Source of information for Trip Generation Rates: Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers and San Diego Assoc. Government Trip Generation Rates. These trip generation rates are based on averages... Retail commercial has been given a 35% pass-by reduction. Page 1 Of 2 g: forms/edubtifx/s ~[. ~ ~~~~ ~~'~~"~` Fia~.~ ~~ b Bi~~ • ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE LAND USE TRIP GENERATION RATE (Non-Residential) [WITH PASS-BYS1 RESTAURANT: Quality (leisure) 63/1,000 sf Sit-down, high turnover (usually chain other than fast food) 133/1,000 sf Fast Food (with or without drive through) 511/1,000 sf Bar/Tavern 100/1,000 sf AUTOMOBILE: Car Wash: Automatic 585/site Self-Serve 70/wash stall Gas Station with or without food mart 97/pump Tire Store/Oil Change Store 28/service bay Auto Sales/Parts Store (no pass-bys) 48/1,000 sf Auto Repair Center (no pass-bys) 20/1,000 sf Truck Terminal (no pass-bys) 80/acre FINANCIAL: Bank (Walk-In Only) 91/1,000 sf Savings and Loan {Walk-In Only} 40/1,000 sf Drive-Through/ATM (Add to Bank or Savings & Loan) 65/lane or machine COMMERCIAL/RETAIL: Super Regional Shopping Center 22/1,000 sf (More than 600,000 SF; usually more than 60 acres, with usually 3 + major stores) Regional Shopping Center 33/1,000 sf (300,000 - 600,000 SF; usually ' 30 - 60 acres, w/usually 2+ major stores/ Community or Neighborhood Shopping Center 46/1,000 sf (Less than 300,000 sf; less than 30 acres w/usually 1 major store or grocery store and detached restaurant and/or drug store) Commercial Shops: Retail/Strip Commercial 26/1,000 sf Commercial with unknown tenant 33/1,000 sf Supermarket 98/1,000 sf Convenience Market 325/1,000 sf Discount Store 46/1,000 sf Lumber Store/Building Materials 20/1,000 sf Garden Nursery 23/1,000 sf Cemetery (no pass-bys) 4/acre Page 2 Of 2 g: Vo~ms{edubtiLxfs AREA OF BENEFIT MAJOR THOROUGHFARES AND BRIDGES WITHIN EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Dublin Blvd.. Extend and widen to 6 lanes from the Southern Pacific Right-of-way to Airway Bfvd. (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on pages 1 and 2 of the DKS revised report from December 15, 1992 and mitigation measure 3.3/10) Hacienda Drive. Widen and extend as 4 lanes from Dublin Blvd. to Gleason Drive and to 6 lanes from I-580 to Dublin Blvd. (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) Transit Spine. Construct four-lane road from Dublin Bivd. west of Hacienda Drive to Fallon Road (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) Gleason Drive. Construct new 4-lane road from west of Hacienda Drive to Fallon Road (from the ElR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) (The Project does not require extension of Gleason Drive to Doolan Road due to no development proposed in the future study area) Tassajara Road. Widen to 4 lanes over a 6-lane right-of-way from Dublin Blvd. to the Contra Costa County Line, and to 6 l-'~~nes over an 8-lane right-of-way from Dublin Bivd. to I-580 .rom the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report and mitigation measure 3.3/14.0) Fallon Road. Extend to Tassajara Road, widen to 4 lanes over a 6-lane right-of-way from I-580 to Tassajara Road (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the DKS revised report) Street Alignment Study. A study is required to specify the exact street alignments in the Eastern Dublin area Cost of Roadway Cost of Bridge Improvements Improvements $ 32,839,870 $ 1,872,000 $ 4,059,603 -0- $ 11,523,736 $ 998,400 $ 4,625,353 $ 572,000 $ 6,365,039 $ 2,496,000 $ 7,486,636 -0- $ 451.000 -0- $ 67.351.237 8 5.938.400 ~. TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS: $ 73,289,637 The Area of Benefit Fee for roadway improvements based on 134,227 related trips for residential and 209,718 trips for non-residential is $1,957/unit for Low Density (1-6 units per acre) and Medium Density Residential (7- 14 units per acre), $1,370 for Medium/High Density Residential (15-25 units per acre), and $1,174 for High Density Residential (more than 25 units); and $196/trip for non-residential. The Area of Benefit Fee for bridge improvements for Low and Medium Density residential is $173/unit, for Medium/High Density .Residential is $1211unit, and for High Density Residential is $104/unit; and non- residential is $17/trip. ,--- ie proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area has 3,916 Low Density units; 4,863 Medium Density units; 2,680 Medium/High Density units; and 2,447 High Density units. ;. ~~:= =~: