The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7.2 OverszdVehPkg Altrntvs CITY CLERK File# 570-20 AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 17, 2003 SUBJECT: On-Street Parking of Oversized Vehicle Alternatives Report Prepared by Joni Pattillo, Assistant City Manager, Lieutenant Glenn Moon, Dublin Police Services, and Marnie R. VFaffle, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Council Agenda Statement dated October 15, 2002 2. City Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2002 on Item 5.1 3. Power Point Presentation from Town Hall Meetings 4. Public Comment from Town Hall Meetings 5. Existing DMC Ordinance Chapter 6.04.430 6. Proposed Ordinance 7. Off-Site Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility Survey RECOMMENDATION: ~\~ Receive Staff presentation and provide Staff with direction on the proposed alternatives or supply additional direction to Staff. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Alternative 1: Adopt the Proposed Ordinance- The cost estimate to implement this alternative is $2,000, which would pay for the new street signs at the entry points to the City of Dublin and the installation of these signs and printing cost associated with the educational brochure. The staff time associated with Alternative 1 is not known at this time. Alternative 3: Community Education- The cost estimates to implement this alternative is $1,000, which will pay for the printing cost associated with the educational brochure. The staff time associated with Alternative 3 is not known at this time. BACKGROUND: A letter dated August 30, 2002, addressed to the Mayor and City Council Members, was received from a group of residents of the Willow Creek subdivision (page 3-4 of Attachment 1) on September 10, 2002. The letter described the residents concerns regarding the parking of recreational vehicles and other COPIES TO: Oversized Vehicle Committee ITEM NO. oversized vehicles in the area of Shady Creek and Alamo Creek Park, and requested that the City consider adopting an Ordinance to address these issues. At the October 15, 2002 City Council Meeting a report was presented to the City Council in response to the issues raised by the residents of Willow Creek (Attachment 1). The City Council directed Staff to form an advisory committee in order to evaluate the feasibility of adopting an Oversized Vehicle Ordinance (Attachment 2). DESCRIPTION: Oversized Vehicle Committee At the Council's direction, Staff posted advertisements in the local newspaper and the City's website seeking interested persons to serve on the advisory committee. The City received a total of eight applications. At the January 21, 2003 City Council meeting, the City Council confirmed the Mayor's recommendation to appoint all eight volunteers who applied by the deadline to serve on the Oversized Vehicle Committee. Staff met with the newly appointed Committee members on February 5, 2003 to review the purpose and intent of the Committee, which was to look at the safety issues associated with parking of recreational and other oversized vehicles on City Streets and to establish regular meeting dates and times. The Oversized Vehicle Committee held five meetings on alternating Wednesday's at 6 p.m. in the City Manager's Conference Room located at 100 Civic Plaza. These meetings were open to the public. The Committee evaluated the current on-street vehicle storage ordinance; identified issues that the existing ordinance did not address; identified issues within the community that needed to be addressed; and proposed a new ordinance to more effectively regulate on-street vehicle parking/storage. The proposed ordinance underwent multiple revisions in order to address all the concems raised by the Committee members. Another key element that the Committee wanted to see accompany the proposed ordinance was an outreach and education campaign. At the April 9, 2003, Oversized Vehicle Committee meeting, dates and locations for three Town Hall meetings were established. All of the Town Hall meetings were held at 7pm. The first meeting was located at Dougherty Elementary on April 30, and approximately 20 citizens, excluding Staff, attended this meeting. The second meeting was at Nielsen Elementary on May 7th, and approximately 8 citizens, excluding Staff, attended this meeting. The third and final Town Hall meeting was held at City Hall on May 14th, and was attended by approximately 15 citizens, excluding Staff. The dates, times, and locations of the Town Hall meetings were advertised in a local newspaper, posted on the City's website, and posted at City Hall, the Library, Shannon Center, and Senior Center. Staff prepared a PowerPoint presentation (Attachment 3) for the Town Hall meetings and received public comment on the Committee's proposed Ordinance (Attachment 4). The Oversized Vehicle Committee met one last time on May 21st to review the outcome of the Town Hall meetings, and incorporated a new section, which addressed that in a declared State of Emergency that the prohibitions of this proposed ordinance would not apply. Alternatives Staff has provided the Council with four alternatives regarding on-street parking/storage of vehicles. Each alternative weighs the pros and cons of choosing that alternative. The first alternative is to consider adopting the proposed ordinance as recommended by the Oversized Vehicle Committee (Attachment 5). The second alternative is to amend the existing ordinance to address vehicle parking/storage near intersections. The third alternative is to maintain the existing ordinance, but conduct community outreach and education regarding responsible ownership of large vehicles. Lastly, the fourth alternative is to simply maintain the existing ordinance. Alternative 1 - Adopt the Proposed Ordinance At the conclusion of the Oversized Vehicle Committee Meetings and the three Town Hall meetings, the Committee is recommending that the City Council adopt the new proposed ordinance to regulate on-street parking/storage of large or oversized vehicles (Attachment 5). Table 1 compares the existing ordinance regarding on-street vehicle storage with the proposed ordinance recommended by the Committee. Highlight most critical aspects of the proposed ordinance. Table 1 48 ~. for L~ge Vehcles Time Li~ts for Paring 72 Ho~ Max~m 24 ~. Pemt Extension 72 ~. Time Limt Total Outside Ci~ Limts or Moved None Specified - allows ~1 to Private Prope~ for a Movement Distance Required movement to avoid e~orcement M~um of 48 ~s. Yes - Co~ercial, Large Motor Vehicle and Non- Definitions of Oversized Vehicles None Motor~ed (Xeepage 1 of A~achment 6). 5 Day Parhng Pemt Available Guest Paring of Oversized Vehicle None Specified from Police Se~ices Ve~cle Over 7 ft in Height Restrictions in Proxi~ to Intersections None Res~cted ~om Park~g M~ 45ft of an Intersection Co~ercial Vehicle in Residential Area - 6,000 lbs. 10,000 lbs. Weight Li~ts No Parking be~een 2:00m Commercial Vehicle Restrictions in No Parhng except for 2 ~. and 6:00 am. Exceptions Residential Area loadin~load~g allowed for 2 ~. loadin~oading Cite and Towing Authority Yes Yes 72 ~. Ve~cle Par~g Oversize Over 48 ~s. 72 ~. parking violation - $50.00 Oversize Over 72 ~s. Faille to Move ~om Ci~ Paring Feemail Schedule Co~ercial Vehicle ~ Residential Mea Li~ts for 48 ~s. violation - $ 50.00 $100-$250-$500 1st, 2nd, 3~a, Offense ~ 12 Monks. For all above offenses Would allow on-s~eet park~g State of Emergency Clause- Excludes None of Overs~ed Vehcles d~ing Emergency Vehicles declared state of emergency Pros · Proposed ordinance would require the movement of identified oversized vehicles from the City streets for a minimum of 48 hours. This would eliminate the circumventing of the existing ordinance by requiring the removal of the oversized vehicles from the roadway. · Increased sight distance and increased vehicular and pedestrian safety in those neighborhoods with existing on street oversized vehicle storage. · Ordinance would allow 48-hour preparation and cleanup period for oversized vehicles parked in front of owner's residence. · Proposed ordinance would allow 5-day guest parking for oversized vehicles. Cons · Possible increased congestion of passenger vehicle parking on roadways based on the removal of oversized vehicles onto driveways and side access. · Difficulty of compliance for some oversized vehicle owners based on lack of availability at local storage sites. · In a residential neighborhood, this alternative may displace some on street parking near intersections to other on-street locations mid-block. While this would make the intersection safer, it could create visual obstructions mid-block for residents who are backing out of their driveways. · This alternative would prevent resident's who live on a comer lot and own a vehicle over 7- feet in height from parking their vehicle on the street in front of or to the side of their home. This restricts on-street parking for residents of comer lots and may result in displacing these vehicles to other on-street locations in front of an adjacent residence. · Lastly, this alternative may result in an increase in parking in the front yard of a residence, impacting the aesthetics of the neighborhood and potentially creating zoning violations. If is City Council's direction is to proceed with Alternative 1, the following identifies the next step(s): I. Staff to publish/post Public Hearing Notice introducing the proposed Ordinance for minimum of 10 days. II. Staffto bring back the proposed Ordinance for City Council's consideration. III. Staff to develop a public education campaign if the proposed Ordinance is passed. IV. Staff to develop an operating procedure on the issuance of the 24-hour resident and 5-day visitor permits. Alternative 2 - Amend the Existing Ordinance This alternative would amend the Dublin Municipal Code Title 6, Article VII, Chapter 6.04.4309 On-street vehicle storage prohibited, to include a provision that would prohibit the parking of any vehicle, motorized or non-motorized, which is 6-feet or more in height, within 45-feet of any intersection within the City of Dublin. This provision was recommended by the Oversized Vehicle Committee in response to concerns about the safety of intersections where the parking of large vehicles creates visual obstructions to motorists. Currently, Chapter 6.04.430 prohibits the parking of vehicles on a public street for more than seventy-two (72) hours (Attachment 6). This alternative proposes to add language to this Chapter that would prohibit parking within 45-feet of an intersection if a vehicle is over 6-feet in height. This provision would apply to all intersections City-wide. Pros · By adding language to the existing regulations, visual obstructions at intersections would be reduced and the safety of intersections within Dublin would be improved. Cons · This alternative does not address existing problems with the "72 hour law". Currently, a vehicle is prohibited from being parked on the street for more than 72 hours. Because the existing ordinance does not specify a time period for which a vehicle must be removed from the street, a vehicle can be shifted just a few feet and the 72-hour time limit starts over. This effectively allows the storage of vehicles on the street. · In a residential neighborhood, this alternative may displace some on street parking near intersections to other on-street locations mid-block. While this would make the intersection safer, it could create visual obstructions mid-block for residents who are backing out of their driveways. · This alternative would prevent resident's who live on a comer lot and own a vehicle over 7- feet in height from parking their vehicle on the street in front of or to the side of their home. This restricts on-street parking for residents of comer lots and may result in displacing these vehicles to other on-street locations in front of an adjacent residence. · Lastly, this alternative may result in an increase in parking in the front yard of a residence, impacting the aesthetics of the neighborhood and potentially creating zoning violations. If is City Council's direction is to proceed with Alternative 2, the following identifies the next step(s): I. Staffto publish/post Public Hearing Notice introducing the amended Ordinance for minimum of 10 days. II. Staff to bring back the amended Ordinance for City Council's consideration. Alternative 3 - Community Education There would be no change to the existing city ordinance regarding on-street storage of vehicles. Staff would create an educational pamphlet concerning responsible ownership of large vehicles. The educational pamphlet would include, but would not be limited to, information on the safety hazards that on-street parking of large vehicles creates for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The pamphlet would also include options for on-site storage based on the current Dublin Zoning Ordinance and a list of local off-site storage facilities (Attachment 7). The police would utilize the informational pamphlet during those times when complaints are received regarding violations of the current 72-hour on-street vehicle storage ordinance. Pros · This alternative would provide education concerning the hazards surrounding the parking/storage of large vehicles on the public roadways. It would kindly request compliance and provides other options for vehicle storage. Cons · This option would provide no further enhanced enforcement during those occasions when an individual circumvents the current ordinance by moving a vehicle a few feet every 72-hours. The vehicle would be in compliance with the current ordinance even though the vehicle remains basically in the same location. In these cases, the police continue to receive complaints from the community. If is City Council's direction is to proceed with Alternative 3, the following identifies the next step(s): Staff to develop information pamphlet and distribute them when complaints are received regarding the violations of the current 72-hour on-street vehicle storage. Alternative 4 - Maintain the Existing Regulations This alternative would maintain the existing regulations (Chapter 6.04.430) that prohibits the parking of any vehicle on a street for more than 72-hours. Pros · None could be identified. Cons · Maintaining the existing regulations would not address the safety issues that have been identified as a result of on-street parking/storage of large vehicles. It also does not address existing problems with the "72-hour law" as mentioned previously in this staff report. If is City Council's direction is to proceed with Alternative 4 the following identifies the next steps: None required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council, receive the Staff presentation and provide Staff with direction on the proposed alternatives or supply additional direction to Staff. CITY CLERK AGENDA STATEMENT CiTY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 2002 SUBJECT: Oversized Vehicle Parking on Residential Streets Report Prepared by: Glenn Moon, Lieutenant - Police Services ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Complaint From Residents Of Willow Creek Subdivision RECO/VllVlENDATION: .~r~tJ~ Receive Staff report and provide direction to Staff`regarding additional action or study on this issue FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: On September 10, 2002 a letter addressed to the Mayor and City Council Members was received from a group of residents of the Willow Creek Subdivision in Dublin. The letter described their concerns attributed to the parking of recreational vehicles and other oversized vehicles in the area of Shady Creek and Alamo Creek Park. The letter requested that the City adopt a City Ordinance that would address the issue of recreational vehicle and oversized vehicle parking in the City of Dublin. The current Dublin City Ordinance, Traffic Code, and Zoning Ordinances do not address the specific issue of on street parking of recreational vehicles or oversized vehicles. The only existing enforcement statute that pertains to this or similar situations is Dublin Municipal Code §6.04.430a "On-street Vehicle Storage Prohibited" This allows the "tagging" of the vehicle and towing the vehicle after seventy-two (72) hours. Unfortunately, it does not address how far the vehicle has to be moved, to meet the 72-hour restriction, nor does it place any limits on how many total days a vehicle can be on the roadway in a specific period of time. Police Services visited the neighborhood of Shady Creek on at least three separate occasions since the date of the letter. Staff observed three recreational vehicles parked in the surrounding neighborhood. One recreational vehicle could be deemed as a traffic hazard, as it blocked the view of oncoming traffic. This was a large motor home with an attached cargo trailer. The vehicle was marked for tow if not moved within 72 hours. This same motor home was given an advisement warning and'marked for tow on three additional occasions during the past three weeks. The owner moves the vehicle several feet every 72 hours, which prevents any further enforcement action. The motor home remains parked generally in the same location. The registered owners of the remaining two recreational vehicles complied with the existing statutory requirement when requested to do so by Police Services and moved their vehicles from the area. COPIES TO: Joseph & Pat Banchero for the Willow Creek 'Residents H/cc-forms/agdastmt doc / ~ ATTACHMENT 1 In the majority of cases, the "tagging" of a vehicle will gain compliance in moving a vehicle from th6~' roadway. There are those cases in which the owner of the vehicle moves the vehicle from one side of the road or a few feet down the road. This starts the 72-hour clock again and prohibits the enforcement of the ordinance. The current ordinance does nothing to help address the issues of traffic hazards that oversized vehicles cause in residential areas. In 1986, the City of Dublin adopted its current Recreational Vehicle Ordinance, which regulates off-street parking of recreational vehicles. This ordinance was adopted after intense debate over a proposed ordinance that would have restricted the parking of recreational vehicles in driveways and side yards throughout the City of Dublin. The ordinance did not address the issue of the parking of commercial, oversized and non-motorized vehicles on city streets; but it relied on the 72-hour ordinance to address the problem of long-term parking. A review was conducted of several City Ordinances from jurisdictions throughout California who have been successful in adopting specific Oversize Vehicle and Non-Motorized Vehicle Ordinances. The City of Costa Mesa has recently adopted an ordinance that covers the parking of commercial, oversized and non- motorized vehicles on all city streets. Their ordinance was adopted after considerable input from both city staffand the recreational vehicle owners of their city. Costa Mesa's ordinance contains the following: No parking of commercial vehicles over 5 tons over 3 hours except for loading and unloading. No parking of non-motorized and recreational vehicles/campers in residential areas for more than 48 hours. An additional 24 hours is allowed on a permit basis from the police department. No parking of oversized vehicle within forty-five (45) feet of an intersection. Vehicles parked on the street for the 48-72 hour permitted period must then be moved from the City limits for period of at least 48 hours. Adopting a similar ordinance could eliminate owners of oversized and non-motorized vehicles from evading the intent of the current law by moving their vehicle(s) a few feet every couple of days to avoid enforcement efforts. An advisory committee could be created in order to evaluate the feasibility of adopting an oversized vehicle ordinance for the City of Dublin. If approved, the committee should be made up of representatives from Police Services, the Planning Department, the Traffic Safety Committee, and community members. Staff recommends the City Council receive the report and provide direction to Staff regarding additional action or study on this issue. Mayor, City of Dublin Dublin City Council Dublin Blvd. ' Dublin, CA August 30e', 2002 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: We are residents of the Willow Creek Subdivision and are 'writing to express our ooncem regarding an increasingly serious problem we are expe~e~ing related to vehicles, including motor homes and boats and commercial vehicles, perked for ext~ded peric,::ls of ttme on the streets of o~ neighborhood. Of particular concern iS the area on _She.ally Creek across and in front of the Alamo Creek Park_ Over the weeks residents heve experienced numerous such problems. Recently, for a week Or longer, a large mater home and trailer with for sale sign parked there extending into the street. On this date a second motor home was perked on the opposite side of the street in the area- This caused a near collision between and resident driving into the area between the two vehicles and another exiting end approaching the same ama from a curve. The on coming vehicle ,.~s barely able to stop in time to prevent s collision. We requested an officer to come out and checJ( on the Vehicles and were informed that the only thing he could do was to mark the tires and, if the vehicle remained in the same spot for 72 hours it =oulcl then be towed. However, since some residents called the owner Of one of the vehicles to complain, it is now being moved from one side to the street to the other side. Therefore, we feel that the existing City Ordinance needs to be changed. The ordinance need to revised to state that both motor, homes and non motorized vehicles such as boats and trailers not be allowed to park on city streets, without permits, between the hours of 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM. There are ordinances in surrounding cities that enable the police to cite and I or tow such vehicles. These ordinances have been effective in deterring residents from storing vehicles on city streets and potentially creating dangerous conditions such as the one described above. Enclosed, for your reference, is a copy of the pertinent.section of an ordinance end warning from the City of.San Leandro. As the growth of Dublin continues, this problem will only increase. For example ali types of vehicles ranging from commercial to mc, mational, are frequently perked on Amador VaJiey Boulevard. Therefore, we are requesting that such an ordinance be drafted and adopted by the Dublin City Council. Such an ordinance ATTACttMENT # i SEP-20-~002 00:09¢~1 TEL)985 4~ 2430 ID)DUBLIN CITY MGR OFFC PRGE:00~ R=99~ will keep our streets an a more safe' condition an well help'to preserve the attmclNe chamb'ter and aesthetics ~ our neighborhood.~ Your attention to this matter will help the.city avoid potential liability for any' injuries that could result from accidents likely to occur if these issues are not addressed. More over your assistance with and attention to c~ur conoems shaJl be greatly ap~. Very truly yours. SEP-tO-~00~ OB:OgRM TEL)925 422 2430 ID~DUBLIN CITY MGR OFFC PRGE:003 R=99~ and authorized the Mayor to executed the Agxeement. OVERSIZED VEHICLE PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS 7:29 p.m. 5. I (570-20) Lt. Glenn Moon, Police Services, presented the Staff Report, indicating that a letter to the Mayor and City Council was received on September 10, 2002, from a group of residents of the Willow Creek Subdivision in Dublin. The letter described their safety concerns attributed to the parking of recreational vehicles and other oversized vehicles in the area of Shady Creek and Alamo Creek Parle The letter requested that the City adopt an Ordinance'that would address the issue of recreational vehicle and oversized vehicle parking in the City of Dublin. In 1986, the City of Dublin adopted its current Recreational Vehicle Ordinance, which regulates off-street parking of recreational vehicles. This ordinance does not address the issue of the parking of commercial, oversized and non,motorized vehicles on City streets; but relied on the 7g-hour ordinance to address the problem of long-term parking. A review was conducted of several City ordinances from jurisdictions throughout California who have been successful in adopting specific Oversize Vehicle and Non- Motorized Vehicle Ordinances. The City of Costa Mesa's recently adopted ordinance covered the parking of commercial, oversize and non-motorized vehicles on all city streets, and contains the following restrictions: No parking of commercial vehicles over $ tons over 3 hours except for loading and unloading; No parking of non-motorized and recreational vehicles/campers in residential areas for more than 48 hours, with an additional 24 hours is allowed on a permit basis from the police department, No parking of oversized vehicles within 45 feet of an intersection; and Vehicles parked on the street for the 48-72 hour permitted period must then be moved from the City limits for a period of at least 48 hours. Staff recommended that an advisory committee be created in order to evaluate the feasibility of adopting an Oversized Vehicle Ordinance ff Council so desired, and asked for Council direction regarding this matter. Cm. McCormick asked for the definition of "oversized vehicle." CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 21 REGULAR MEETING October 1 S, 2002 PAGE 51 9 ATTACHMENT 2 Lt. Moon advised that an oversized vehicle would be 22 feet in length or 7 feet in width or 7 feet in height. .Mayor Lockhart asked about commercial vehicles. Lt. Moon indicated that Dublin's present Commercial Vehicle Ordinance does not allow commercial vehicles in residential areas unless loading or unloading, with a 5-ton or 10,000 lb. limit. "Most recreational vehicles don't reach the 5~ton limit. The adoption of an ordinance for oversized vehicles needs to be adopted to cover all City streets, not just the residential area. Otherwise, people will move their oversized vehicle out of the. residential area into the commercial area, and then move it back. Staff suggests the vehicles be moved from City limits for a period of 48 hours. Mayor Lockhart asked how the ordinance would be mordtored? Lt. Moon indicated that the Traffic Division of Dublin Polices Services is in time to these vehicles already through citizen complaints. An ordinance would establish procedures, including a warning placard on the vehicle, and vehicle tracking. Cm. Zika asked if Dublin already had a Commercial Vehicle Ordinance? Lt. Moon indicated yes, an ordinance was adopted several years ago regarding major commercial vehicles (semi-trucks with trailers) on certain commercial streets, as well as restrictions on residential streets. These vehicles have a three-hour parking limit in restricted areas and cannot be parked overnight. Cm. Zika stated that Police Services is not doing good job of enforcing that ordinance now. Two dump trucks have been parking on Village Parkway for the past two weekends. City Manager Richard Ambrose asked where on Village Parkway the dump trucks were parked. The Commercial Vehicle Ordinance prohibits parking in residential districts, and certain restricted commercial areas. Some commercial areas allow for commercial vehicle parking. Cm. Zika indicated that the proposed ordinance amendment should exclude parking commercial vehicles along all of Village Parkway. Lt. Moon recommended that the ordinance encompass both commercial and oversize vehicles. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 21 REGULAR MEETING October 15, 2002 PAGE 520 Mayor Lockhart advised that she always receives complaints about people bringing home work vehicles with trailers attached, and asked if the proposed ordinance would cover commercial vehicles parked in front of an employee own home? Lt. Moon indicated yes, if it falls under tonnage limit. This ordinance would allow for vehicles under 10,000 lbs and moved daily, so it wouldn't apply to that situation. Cm. Oravetz asked what happened to the camper on Shady Creek Road that instigated the neighborhood letter? Lt. Moon indicated that the vehicle stayed in place over 7Z hours and was towed; however, it took several weeks to achieve that. Cm. Oravetz asked if the whole curb area on Shady Creek where this vehicle was parked could be painted red? Lt. Moon advised against that suggestion; it would take away too much parking for the park. Although an oversized vehicle on that portion of the road would cause safety concerns, regular vehicles would not. Mayor Lockhart read a letter submitted by 10 residents on Burnham Way and Frederiksen Lane, encouraging the Council to form a taskforce to consider amending the current ordinance. Mayor Lockhart read a speaker slip submitted by Jefrey Watts, Frederiksen Lane, who supported the concept of an ordinance against oversized vehicles parking on residential streets. Mayor Lockhart read a speaker slip submitted by Yvonne Nickles, Burnham Way, who supported the formation of a committee to discuss an ordinance amendment. Kathleen Robinson, Frederiksen Lane, encouraged the Council to review the Municipal Code section regarding parking motor homes on private property, and alleged that a motor home was parked in the driveway of a neighbor's house to provide housing for transient workers fOr a local fast-food restaurant. She distributed photos to the Council of the motor home. Cm. Sbranti recommended that, for safety and aesthetic reasons, the Council establish a committee to look at on~street and off~street parking for all oversized commercial and recreational vehicles. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 21 REGULAR MEETING October 15, 2002 PAGE 521 Mr. Ambrose reviewed the current ordinance, which prohibits commercial vehicles in residential district, and those in excess of :5 tons on any street, with several exceptions including delivery trucks, passenger buses, pubhc utility vehicles, school buses, and garbage/recycling trucks. Currently, the Commercial Vehicle Ordinance in residential districts does not have a size limitation, but has a weight limitation of $ tons. Commercial districts are affected by other sections of the code, depending on how the streets are posted, the weight of the vehicle, etc. In terms of residential areas, Council has discussed the issue before and has prohibited vehicles based on weight. Mayor Lockhart asked the size of the motor home shown in the photo? Lt. Moon advised that the majority of motor homes are 'built hsht for fuel economy, and offered to look into the weight capacity of the vehicle in photo. Mr. Ambrose indicated that the current ordinance was precipitated by owner-operators of trucking businesses parking their rig on the residential street in front of their homes. The Council initiated and adopted the ordinance to preclude those types of commercial vehicles in residential districts. Cm. Sbranti asked if Council could direct a committee to review the existing ordinance and the new issue about oversized vehicles parking on residential streets? The Council and Staff discussed the scope of the committee, and how the meetings would be held. It was suggested that community input be derived from a series of town hall meetings, with an advisory committee with representatives from both sides of the issue, discu~ssin$ and making recommendations. Cm. McCormick expressed a desire to really define the scope of the committee. The commercial area may not need to be looked at right now. Cm. Sbranti suggested that the committee look at the issue of oversized vehicle parking on residential streets. As a separate issue, the Council could review and consider the issue of commercial vehicle parking in commercial districts at a future Council meeting. Cm. Zika felt that the Council still needed to consider off-street oversized vehicle parking in residential areas, as well as on-street parking. Lt. Moon indicated that Dublin's current Recreational Vehicle larking Ordinance is part of the Zoning Ordinance, which dealt with designated off-street parking areas (driveway, paved area next to the roadway, rear yards, etc.) in private residences. He recommended any established committees dealing with on-street parking, and CITY COUNCIL MINIYrF3 VOLUM~ 21 REGULAR MEETING October 15, 2002 PAGE 522 commercial parking, should be handled separately.from parking on private property because it would be too cumbersome. One is a private property zoning issue; the other is a traffic and a street issue. Cm. Oravetz made a motion to form an advisory committee in order to evaluate the feasibility of adopting an Oversized Vehicle Ordinance. The Committee should be made up of representatives from Police Services, Planning Department, Traffic Safety Committee, and community members appointed by Mayor Lockhart. Cm. McCormick seconded the motion for discussion. Cm. McCormick clarified that a committee would be created to look at one item: residential on~street parking. The other two issues, commercial vehicles parked in commercial districts and on-site RV parking, are problems that should be dealt with by the Council. The Council concurred and indicated a desire for the issues to come back to Council in a timely manner. Mr. Ambrose advised that most of the complaints received by Staff were regarding . inoperative vehicles on private property or on the public street, few complaints are received with respect to commercial vehicles parked on commercial streets. He asked CounciFs permission to look specifically into Cm. Zika's complaints to ascertain whether. or not it's in compliance with our currant ordinance. Cm. Zika agreed. Mayor Lockhart stated that it might resolve that particular issue; however, it is obvious that the oversized vehicles on private property zoning issue needs to be considered by Council. The Council concurred and directed Staff to prepare a Staff Report for a Council meeting in the near future regarding oversized vehicle parking on private property. On motion of Cm. Oravetz, seconded by Cm. McCormick, and by unanimous vote, the Council accepted Staff's recommendation to establish a Committe.e, which would be advertised to the public, and set up a series of town hall meetings to discuss the issue of on-street parking of oversized vehicles in residential areas. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 21 REGULAR MEETING October 15, 2002 PAGE 523 City of Dublin Town Hall Meeting Proposed Changes to Oversized Vehicle Ordinance Agenda · Introductions · Overview · Comparison of Current and Proposed Ordinance · Next Steps · Questions and Answers ATTACHMENT 3 I. Introductions II. Overview · Ground Rules · Purpose · Intended Outcome 2 II. Overview (cont.) · Oversized Vehicles · Motorized · Non-Motorized Boat and Trailer Travel Trailer Class C Motorhome Boat and Trailer Class C Motorhome Commercial Vehicle Over 5 Tons Boat and Trailer Class A Motorhome Class A Motorhome Two (2) Class C Motorhomes Boat and Trailer III. Comparison of Current and Proposed Ordinance · Current-Dublin Municipal Code 6.04.430 - On-Street Vehicle Storage - No vehicle shall be parked or left standing on a street for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours. III. Comparison of Current and Proposed Ordinance III. Comparison of Current and Proposed Ordinance III. Comparison of Current and Proposed Ordinance III. Comparison of Current and Proposed Ordinance Definitions · "Large Motor Vehicle"- any house car, pickup truck with camper, recreational vehicle or other vehicle that measures more then twenty two (22) feet in length OR is more then eighty four (84)inches in width OR eighty four (84)inches in height. The term "large motor vehicle" does not include a pickup truck without a camper or sports utility vehicle. ~i Definitions (cont.) ~ · "~on-motodzed Vehiclo" shall mean any I trailer or any other device that is not self-propellod. · How big is 22-feet in len§th and 84- inches in width and hei§ht? Class A Motorhome · WIDTH 102" · HEIGHT 127" · LENGTH 33' ]2 Class C Motorhome · WIDTH 100" · HEIGHT 120" · LENGTH 22' Boat Trailer- No Boat · WIDTH 98" · HEIGHT 32" · LENGTH 19' Class A Motorhome · WIDTH 96" · HEIGHT 120' · LENGTH 33' Boat and Trailer · WIDTH 90" · HEIGHT 82" · LENGTH 18' ]4 Enclosed Cargo Trailer · WIDTH 94" · HEIGHT 86" · LENGTH 18' IV. Next Steps Two Additional Town Hall Meetings: -May 7, 2003, Nielson Elementary - May 14, 2003, City Hall · Oversized Vehicle Committee to meet again on May 21,2003 IV. Next Steps (cont.) · Present the proposed Ordinance to the City Council in June 2003 (2 hearings required) · If City Council approves the proposed Ordinance, there will be a 90 day educational period V. Question and Answer Proposed Oversized Vehicle Ordinance Town Hall Meetings Public Comment April 30, 2003 1. City should find a solution to park RV's. )~ Land within City limits ~ City building RV park 2. Private property parking of RV's is not always feasible. 3. Curvature issues, not intersections (residential). (Should be referred to Traffic Safety Committee.) 4. Can residents get a visitor permit for guests? 5. Who can file a complaint? Affected parties? Needs to be defined. 6. There should be no ordinance at all restricting RV's. 7. City should actively look for a site to store vehicles )~ There is vacant land available now; there might not be in the future. 8. Costa Mesa was used as a model. It is a go-to City and Dublin is a come-from City. 9. Dublin has undersized streets. May 7, 2003 1. There is no place in the Tri-Valley to take an RV. 2. Is the City going to provide a place for storage? 3. Newspaper article stated City was targeting RV's. 4. There should be no ordinance; Police should identify safety issues in the field and address them at that time. 5. What about off-street RV parking? Is the City not going to allow off-street parking/storage as well? May 14, 2003 1. There are safety issues at the Dublin Post Office. 2. Find a place within the City of Dublin to park RV's, boats, and large vehicles. 3. Currently, there are long waiting lists in Dublin for storage. 4. Vandalism is a concern. Residents prefer to have vehicle close by to keep an eye on the vehicle. 5. What is the availability of Camp Parks? 6. What about SUV's parked on corners? 7. A narrow street with an RV parked on-street obstructs visibility when backing out of a driveway. 8. Currently there is a problem with tracks parking on Kimball. Is this in the City of Dublin or San Ramon? ATTACHMENT 4 City of Dublin Municipal Code Applications to On-Street Parking Enforcement 6.04.430 On-street vehicle storage prohibited. No vehicle shall be parked or left standing on a street for seventy-two (72) or more consecutive hours. (Ord. 55-87 § 33: Ord. 13 § I (part), 1982) 6.04.450 Obstruction of enforcement prohibited. No person shall obstruct the enforcement of this chapter by any officer, employee, or peace officer of the city by: A. Removing, obliterating, or concealing any distinguishing mark placed by any such officer or employee on any vehicle in the course of enforcing any provision of this chapter; or B. Moving any vehicle from any parking space on any street where parking is limited as to time to any other parking space on any street where parking is limited as to time for the purpose of evading any such parking time limitation established by or pursuant to any provision of this chapter. (Ord. 55-87 § 31: Ord. 13 § 1 (part), 1982) ATTACHMENT 5 ORDINANCE NO. - 03 (Revised 05/22/03) ~ ~'~-9~ ~ A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTION 6.04.430 REGARDING ON-STREET STORAGE OF VEHICLES AND REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF OTHER AFFECTED SECTIONS OF TIlE DUBLIN MUNICPAL CODE. The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: Section 1: Section 6.04.430 of Chapter 6, of the Dublin Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Section 2: A new Section 6.04.430 of Chapter 6, of the Dublin Municipal Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: 6.04.430 Use of streets for parking and/or storage of certain vehicles prohibited. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. (1) "Chief of Police" means the Chief of Police of the City of Dublin, or his designee. (2) "Commercial Vehicle" shall mean any vehicle having more than two axles, or any single commercial vehicle or combination of said vehicles, which exceed twenty (20) feet in length, any single commercial vehicle or combination of said vehicles eighty-four (84) inches or more in width, or any single commercial vehicle or combination of said vehicles having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating of ten thousand (10,000) pounds or more. A Commercial Vehicle includes a truck tractor, but does not include a large motor vehicle or non-motorized vehicle as defined herein or a pickup truck without a cab over camper or sports utility vehicle. (3) "Large Motor Vehicle" shall mean any house car, pickup truck with cab over camper, recreational vehicle or other vehicle that measures more than twenty two (22) feet in length OR is more then eighty-four (84) inches in width, OR more than eighty-four (84) inches in height. The term "large motor vehicle" does not include a commercial vehicle as defined herein, a pickup truck without a cab over camper or sports utility vehicle. (4) "Non-motorized Vehicle" shall mean any trailer or any other device that is not self- propelled. (5) "Motor Vehicle" shall mean a passenger vehicle, pickup truck without a cab over camper, sports utility vehicle, motorcycle and motor-driven cycle but shall not include a house car as defined in Section 362 of the California Vehicle Code. (6) "Residential District" shall mean any area within the City, which is zoned R-l, R-2, R- M, and those portions of planned community districts and specific plan districts that are specified for residential uses. (b) Measurements: To determine the width or length of the vehicles defined in this section, any extension to the vehicle caused by mirrors, air conditioners, or similar attachments shall not be included. ATTACHMENT 6 (c) No person who owns or has possession, custody, or control of any motor vehicle, shall pa~k °r leave standing, such motor vehicle upon any public street, highway or alley for a more than a period of seventy (72) consecutive hours. (d) No person shall, at any time, park or leave standing any large motor vehicle or non-motorized vehicle on any public street, highway or alley except: (1) In residential districts, large motor vehicles, or non-motorized vehicles which are attached to a motor vehicle or large motor vehicle and parked on the right of way fronting the owner's residence, are allowed for the purposes of loading, unloading, cleaning, battery- charging, or other activity preparatory or incidental to travel for a period of time not to exceed forty-eight (48) consecutive hours. (2) In residential districts, large motor vehicles, or non-motorized vehicles which are attached to a motor vehicle, parked on the right of way fronting the owner's residence may be allowed for an additional twenty-tour (24) consecutive hours, but no more than a total of seventy-two (72) hours, provided an extension permit has been granted by the chief of police. The chief of police shall establish general standards for an extension provided by this section. (3) Any large motor vehicle or non-motorized vehicle which is attached to a motor vehicle or large motor vehicle that is parked on a public street pursuant to either subsections (1) or (2) hereinabove shall, at the end of the permitted period of time, whether forty-eight (48) or seventy-two (72) hours, be removed from its location and shall not be parked on any public street, or posted private property within the city limits, for the purposes stated hereinabove for a period of at least forty-eight (48) hours. (4) Visitor Parking, A visitor to a resident of a single family or two family dwelling located in a residential district may temporarily park a "large motor vehicle" or a "non-motorized vehicle" attached to a motor vehicle on the right of way fronting the dwelling being visited, based on the criteria listed below. (i) The visitor obtains a "Visitor Parking Permit" from the Chief of Police or designee. (ii) The vehicle is registered or leased and operated by a person permanently residing more then fifty miles from the visitation site. (iii) The vehicle complies with the definition of a "large motor vehicle" or a "non- motorized vehicle" which is attached to motor vehicle and is used for recreational housing purposes only. (iv) The vehicle shall not be used for habitation and cannot be connected to utility services for the duration of the visit. (v) The vehicle may be parked for a period of time not to exceed a total of five days in a thirty-day period. (5) State of Emergency, The prohibitions provided in this ordinance shall not apply to the parking of any oversized vehicle during any state of emergency declared to exist within the City of Dublin by the City Council. (e) No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle or non-motorize~l'D% vehicle which is six (6) feet or more in height (including any load thereon) shall park or leave standing any such vehicle on a street or highway within forty-five (45) feet of any intersection. (f) No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any commercial vehicle exceeding a manufacturers gross vehicle weight of ten thousand (10,000) pounds, shall, park or leave standing any such commercial vehicle on a street or highway which is prohibited to commercial vehicle traffic pursuant to Section 6.88.040 of this code. (g) No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any commercial vehicle exceeding a manufacturers gross vehicle weight of ten thousand (10,000) pounds, shall park or leave standing any such commercial vehicle on any restricted street between the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 a.m. (h) No person who owns or has possession, custody, or control of a commercial vehicle exceeding a manufacturers gross vehicle weight often thousand (10,000) pounds, shall park or leave standing any such commercial vehicle for more than two (2) hours on any public street, highway, roadway, alley or thoroughfare, except: (1) For such reasonable time in excess of two (2) hours that may be necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used for repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon a restricted street or highway; or (2) For such reasonable time in excess of two (2) hours that may be necessary when such vehicle in parked in connection with the performance of a service to or on a property in which such vehicle is parked; or (3) For such reasonable time in excess of two (2) hours that may be necessary time to make emergency repairs. (4) No regulation adopted in this chapter shall apply to any vehicle owned by a public utility or licensed contractor while necessarily in use in the construction, installation, or repair of any public utility. (i) Vehicles found in violation of this section may be cited or removed, or both cited and removed in accordance with section 6.04.210. (j) The City Engineer shall erect and maintain suitable signs notifying the public of the permissible weights and sizes of vehicles and their loads operated or moved upon those streets hereinafter designated. Section 3; Section 6.92.010 of Chapter 6 of the Dublin Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Section 4; A new Section 6.92.010 of Chapter 6, of the Dublin Municipal Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: 6.92.010 Established. 3\ ~'3 ''J No person shall operate any commercial vehicle, as said term is defined in the California Vehicle Code, having a gross weight, including load, in excess of five (tons) on any street within any residence district, as such term is defined in the California Vehicle Code, in the city; provided, signs are in place at city entrances giving notice of this prohibition. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of__, 2003. AYE S: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk H: ICC-FORMS~FORM-reso. doc PROPOSED BAIL SCHEDULE - OVERSIZED VEHICLE ORDINANCE ~, ~'~ ~ The bail for the first, second and third offense in a 12-month period £or the following violations of the Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 6 shall hereby be as follows: 6.04.430(c) Vehicle Parking - over 72 hours I $100-$250-$500 6.04.430(d)(1) RV Parking - over 48 hours I $100-$250-$500 6.04.430(d)(2) RV Parking - over 72 hours I $100-$250-$500 6.04.430(d)(3) RV Parking - failure to remove RV for 48 hours I $100-$250-$500 6.04.430(e) Vehicle over 6' height within 45' I $50-$100-$200 of Intersection off-Site Storage Facility Survey Do you lease space for the storage of recreational vehicles, including RV's, How many spaces are If there are no spaces How much does it List of businesses that may provide storage of trailers, boats; and currently available for available, is there a How are spaces cost to store one Miles recreational vehicles including RV's, trailers, boats, and similar types of the storage of these waiting list? If so, how leased, i.e. month recreational from similar vehicles, vehicles? types of vehicles? long is the wait? to month? vehicle? Dublin Cost to Store Business Name & Address Telephone Number Yes or No # of Spaces Available Length of Waiting List Type of Lease .... Vehicle~ *Dublin Self Storage 6100 Dougherty Road 10 Total Dublin, CA 94568 925-828-3063 Yes 1 available No - always booked Month to Month 0.5 *Pleasanton RV & Equipment $42 (20') 3700 Boulder Street 225-250 Total Yes $115.50 (55') Pleasanton, CA 925-426-0777 Yes 2 available 2-3 mo wait Qrtrly 4 *Pleasa~ton RV & Equip Storage This is an off-site office only 147 Old Bernal Avenue for above facility- no storage Pleasanton, CA 925-426-0777 at this address 4.3 Lockaway Storage 8555 Dublin Canyon Road Castro Valley, CA 510-582-5956 Not open until Spring 2003 4.3 Airport Self Storage 1491 Rutan Drive 130 Total $110 (10'x25') Livermore, CA 925-606-1024 Yes 56 available No Month to Month $175+- (1.21X351) 6.7 Shurgard Storage Center Month to Month 21655 Redwood Road 4 Total Smallest is 1 Castro Valley, CA 510-582-9800 Yes None available ..Not sure_ week $161 (10'x20') 8.5 *Mobile Storage - Irene 29505 Pacific Street 85 Total Yes $60 (15') Hayward, CA 510-690-1940 Yes 9 available Month to Month $120 (40') 9.3 Hayward Storage 29605 Pacific Street 300 Total Yes Hayward, CA 510-582-6472 Yes Unknown Availability Usually booked fast Month to Month $50-$120 9.3 Diamond Crossing RV Storage 11 W. Jackson Street No - Selling those Hayward, CA 510-538-1150 spaces 9.9 *Union City RV Storage 35136 Alvarado Niles Road Union City, CA 510-745-8470 10 Pre-§ton Ave-RV 'Storage 5721 Preston Ave 120 Total $60 (25') Livermore, CA 925-449-8211 Yes 3-4 available No Qrtrly $75 (40') 10.6 Please note: All unmarked information is current as of May 27, 2003. * All Marked information is current as of November 20, 2002. ATTACHMENT 7 Do you lease space for the storage of recreational vehicles, including RV's, How many spaces are If there are no spaces How much does it List of businesses that may provide storage of trailers, boats, and currently available for available, is there a How are spaces cost to store one Miles recreational vehicles including RV's, trailers, boats, and similar types of the storage of these waiting list? If so, how leased, i.e. month recreational from similar vehicles, vehicles? types of vehicles? long is the wait? to month? vehicle? Dublin Cost to Store Business Name & Address Telephone Number Yes or No # of Spaces Available Length of Waiting List _Type of Lease Vehicles 800 Total Ideal Boat & Camper Storage None available - Over 6271 Tesla Road 2000 if get rezoning, Yes $40 (10') Livermore, CA 925-447-6347 Yes_ ..... requ_es_ts.a.!etter 9~ reco _ _ 120 on list Month to Month $65 (42') 11.5 Mini-Safe Storage & RV $69 (21-27' uncvrd) 15311 Hesperian Blvd 208 Total $75 (20' cvrd) San Leandro, CA 510-276-2000 Yes 6 Available No Month to Month $80 (22'+ cvrd) 11.5 Industrial Self Storage Yes - Full all Winter, $75 (20') 27911 Industrial Blvd. 32 Total Begin to call in Summer $80 (21'+) Hayward, CA 510-887-_14_~4 .................... Y_e§_ .... ~ ava!l._a.b~!~_ _ _ wh~en spaces open up Month to Month 11.6 *A & B Storage 27649 Industrial Blvd. Hayward, CA 510-785-7575 No 11.6 Hayward RV Storage 3636 Depot Road 100 Total Hayward, CA 510-785-1854 Yes 3 Available Yes - 2-3 Month Wait Month to Month $60-$90 (up to 60') 12.4 Pacific RV Storage 16525 Worthley Drive No - Moving to San Lorenzo, CA 510-481-0900 Stockton 12.9 Seaside RV Storage $48 (20'), + $1 per 2477 Baumann Ave. 200 Total ft after that up to San Lorenzo, CA 510-481-1428 Yes 20 Available Yes Month to Month 40' 13.1 Emmett Associates 37955 Timber Street 400 Total $50-$80 / mo (25' - Newark, CA 510-797-3051 Yes 47 Available Yes- Not Long Quarterly 45') 13.1 Holiday Storage 43033 Osgood Road $44 Min + $2.20 / ft Fremont, CA 510-657-9596 Yes over 20' 13.2 ?Tic Storage i3842 Auto Mall Parkway 400 Total $50 (20') Fremont, CA 510-657-9600 Yes None available No Month to Month $125 (40') 13.8 Marina Boulevard Storage Cntr 2099 Marina Blvd. 200 Total $50 (27') San Leandro, CA 510-537-5169 Yes 1 available No Month to Month $100 (40') 14.1 Please note: All unmarked information is current as of May 27, 2003. * All Marked information is current as of November 20, 2002. 2 Do you lease space for the storage of recreational vehicles, including RV's, How many spaces are If there are no spaces How much does it List of businesses that may provide storage of trailers, boats, and currently available for available, is there a How are spaces cost to store one Miles recreational vehicles including RV's, trailers, boats, and similar types of the storage of these waiting list? If so, how leased, i.e. month recreational from similar vehicles, vehicles? types of vehicles? long is the wait? to month? vehicle? Dublin ~ Cost to Store Business Name & Address Telephone Number Yes or No # of Spaces Available Length of Waiting List Type of Lease Vehicles Cai Self Storage 44301 Fremont Blvd. 105 Total Fremont, CA 510-656-7066 Yes None Available Yes - Long Month to Month $45-$85 / mo _ ~. 14.2 $50 (25') Fremont Vehicle Storage $70 (25-34') 44655 Fremont Blvd. 349 Total $80 (34-40') Fremont, CA 510-656-3353 Yes 48 Available __NO _ Month to Month $85 (40-43') 14.4 Auto Mall RV & Boat Storage .... $65 (25') 42335 Boscell Road 478 Total $135 (12x45') Fremont, CA 510-490-2200 Yes 235 available (50%) Yes_- 2 weeks Month to Month $180 (70') 14.5 Rodie's Feed & Country Store 8863 Marsh Creek Road 25 Total Clayton, CA 925-672-4600 Yes _10 Available Yes Month to Month $59 - $71 ___14.5 *Bay RV & Boat Storage 2345 Warm Springs Ct. 450 Total $60 (25') Fremont, CA 510-490-0668 Yes 10_ aYail_a_ble Yes Month to Month $120 (40') 14.6 G K RV Storage 45852 Warm Springs Blvd. 300 Total $55 (20') Fremont, CA 510-656-7514 Yes 25 available No Month to Month _$8_5~_(30_')- _ 14.9 *Act Auto Storage 4800 E. 12th Street Oakland, CA 510-534-3788 No . 16.4 Harbor Bay Self Storage & RV ' 115 Total 500 Maitland Drive 2 Available $80 (20') Alameda, CA 94501 510-769-5222 Yes Expanding,_Add.ing_~00 Yes Month to Month $100 (40') 16.9 *Milpitas RV Storage 420 Railroad Court Milpitas, CA 408-946-0722 19 c0mr~-erce R-V Storage ..... $123.60 (21') 1420 Royal Industrial Way 100 Total $135 (25') Concord, CA 925-689-6441 Yes None available Yes - 20-25 People Qtrly _$_162-~.1_8~9 (_35'_) 19.5 *North First Street RV Storage 5201 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 408-263-5858 19.9 Please note: All unmarked information is current as of May 27, 2003. .-' * All Marked information is current as of November 20, 2002. 3 Do you lease space for the storage of recreational vehicles, including RV's, How many spaces are If there are no spaces How much does it List of businesses that may provide storage of trailers, boats, and currently available for available, is there a How are spaces cost to store one Miles recreational vehicles including RV's, trailers, boats, and similar types of the storage of these waiting list? If so, how leased, i.e. month recreational from similar vehicles, vehicles? types of vehicles? long is the wait? to month? vehicle? Dublin Cost to Store Business Name & Address Telephone Number Yes or No # of Spaces Available Length of Waiting List Type of Lease Vehicles *Wilbur Avenue Storage 3635 Wilbur Avenue Antioch, CA 925-778-5799 22.7 Delta Storage 1241 A Highway 4 Unsure Total Oakley, Ca 925-754-7011 Yes None Available No Quarterly $30-35 / mo 22.7 400 Total Long Way T'Go Ranch None Available Month to Month $35 / mo + $35 8413 Byron Hwy Adding 100 by Mid July Yes with Long Term Deposit (boats Brentwood, CA 925-625-1940 Yes 2003_ .l~ee!~ t0 1_ ~o~th- .... Brgf~r~n_ce. ....... _under__25') 23.1 Sugar Barge Resort & Marina 4515 Willow Road 200 Total $115 / mo Bethel Island, CA 925-684-8575 Yes A Few Available No Month to Month "No Junk" 26 Sugar Barge Resod & Marina Never Full, Very Large $115 / mo (to 30') + 1440 Sugar Barge Road Some Available, $4-5 per foot over Bethel Island, CA 925-684-9075 Yes Building More Sort Of Month to Month 30' 26 Please note: All unmarked information is current as of May 27, 2003. * All Marked information is current as of November 20, 2002.