The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 100-95 TVT Plan/ActionRESOLUTION NO. 100 - 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING THE TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ACTION PLAN FOR ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has actively participated in the cooperative, multi- jurisdictional planning efforts undertaken by the Tfi-Valley Transportation Council; and WHEREAS, the solution of providing reasonable transportation services in the Tri-Valley will require the combined efforts of all of its member jurisdictions and other transportation agencies; and WHEREAS, the seven Tri-Valley jurisdictions in 1991 formed the Tri-Valley Transportation Council with the charge of preparing the Tri-Valley Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, these jurisdictions working diligently have developed a Tri-Valley Transportation Traffic Model and subsequently produced the Tfi-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance ("Plan)"; and WHEREAS, there were opportunities throughout the development of the Plan for public input, the Draft Plan was circulated and there was opportunity for public testimony at all Tri-Valley Transportation Council meetings; and' WHEREAS, each jurisdiction has previously reviewed and commented upon the Circulation Draft and the Plan for Adoption; and WHEREAS, a follow-up study will be conducted to provide the basis for consensus on actions necessary to achieve Level of Service D at all study intersections within the Tri-Valley; and WHEREAS, the successful implementation of the Plan is partially contingent upon the adequate funding of transportation facilities which may require a Regional Traffic Impact Fee; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Dublin has determined and orders as follows: The Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance is recommended for adoption subject to inclusion of the modifications shown on Exhibit 2; , The Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance shall be used as a guide when adopting or amending elements to the City' s General Plan and specific plans, zoning ordinances or capital improvement programs; The City shall consider working with other jurisdictions in the Tri-Valley region to adopt multi-jurisdictional cooperative planning agreements; Following completion of the Combined Study, the City shall consider adopting actions required to achieve compliance with Traffic Service Objectives; , The City shall contribute $15,000 as its fair share of the "Combined Study: Transportation Model Upgrade, Transportation Service Objectives Management Study and Traffic Impact Fee Study." PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 8th day of August, 1995. AYES: Councilmembers Barnes, Burton, Howard, Moffatt and Mayor Houston NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: g: ~agenmisc ~resotvtp K2 /8-8- 9 5/resotvtp. doc CITY OF DUBLIN RO. Box 2340, Dublin. California 94568 Oilices, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. California 94568 March 17, 1995 Millie Greenberg, Chairperson Tri-Valley Transportation Council c/o Town of Danville 510 La Gonda Way Danville CA 94526 SUBJECT: Changes to Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan Dear Millie: We would like to commend the Tri-Valley Transporta!ion Council (TVTC) and the Tri-Valley Transportation Technical Advisory Committee for all of their hard work in preparing the Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan (Plan). At their February 27, ~995, meeting The Dublin City Council approved tile adoption of the Plan with the contingency that the following changes be made. Added text is underlined and deleted test is indicated by brackets, [ ]. Add the following to the first "resolved" statement to read as follows: "...or Capital Improvement. Programs, with lhe ti-fil, ,wing revisions to the Plan. Page xiii, paragraph 2: Delete the fifird sentence, beginning with "nevertheless", regarding indirect effects on growill. Page 119, paragraph 5: Reduced LOS Standards. These were considered [ ] for lhe freeway system in locafons where through traffic made achievement ofTSOs impossible for the TVTC to achieve. While demand volumes could not be accommodate.!, ramp metering would allow achievement of CMP mandated levels of s'.:n'ice on the freeways· Reduced LOS standards were also cons__idered for arlerials as pan of the strategy for resolving TSO violations, a.s.di,qgussed on p. 237 of the l~laj3~ Page 121, column 5, rmv 4: Revise the table to add a footnote reference at the "Dublin-Reduced Land Use" entry with the footnote to read as follows: "Via consideration of growth plan per p. 232 of Plan". Page 131, paragraph 3: Revise to read as ~qllows: Jurisdictions EXHIBIT 2 Administration (415) 833-6650 * City Council (415) 833-6605 ·Financc- H15) 8:1.~-6640 · Building Inspection (415) 833-6620 /U,,.,t,-,.~..,- rdt~ Code Enlorcement (415) 833-6620 · Enf}ineelin9 (41:,) 83:~-66:ff. · Planning (415) 833-6610 Pr-,linc. (/llci~ RR.':t-(';670 · Pt~hl,C Work!; {41.~I 8.q:~,-6630 · Re:;teafion (415) 833-6645 March 17, 1995 Millie Greenberg, TVTC TVTC Resolution Page 2 in Tri-Valley may implement a proactive Growth and Congestion management strategy once a detailed growth management study has been conducted. The study should indicate the development reductions, land use density reductions, or other types of growth management/control that would be required for each applicable Tri-Valley jurisdiction in order to achieve TSO standards. Any development reduction should be proportional to the traffic distribution [ ] ibr each jurisdiction. Any development reductions should be considered for their equitable effect on the development potential of the participating jurisdictions. Reductions should not create a "race" to develop, and it' adopted. shall instire that jurisdictions with relatively greater development potential do not bear the full brunt of the development reductions. Also, the impact of this development reduction to traffic impact fees should be analyzed; other alternatives such as a toll road may also be analyzed. All jurisdictions will then review this information and know exactly how much reduction in development or growth management/control is needed to meet the TSOs. The growth management study and a:ly im!~act fees would each have to be approved unanimously, Violations or projected violations ofTSO standards remaining after a grow'th management strategy is adopted shall be resolved as discussed on p. 237 of the Plan, NOTE: The last paragraph on p. 232 is iden:ical to this paragraph, and the same changes are proposed for that text as shown below. Page 197, Recommended Actions: Cop::i. ter putting in place mutually agreed and equitable multi-jurisdictional growth management to insure achievement of TSOs. Page 232, last paragraph: Revise to read as follows: Jurisdictions in Tri-Valley may implement a proactive Growth and Congestion Management strategy once a detailed growth management study has been conducted. The study should indicate the de,,elopment reductions, land use density reductions, or other types of growth management/control that would be required for each applicable Tri-Valley jurisdiction in order to achieve TSO standards. Any development reduction should be proportional to the traffic distributioi! [ ] for each jurisdiction. Any developmere reductions should be considered for their equitable effect on the development potential of the participating jurisdictions, Reduc/ions should not create a "race" to develop. and if adopted, shall insure that jurisdictions with relatively greater development potential do not bear the full brunt of the development reductions. Also, the impact of this M~tCll 1'/, · MillI~ Grccnb~rg, TVTC ' TVTC R~soluflon P~g~ 3 development reduction to traffic impacl l~es should b~ analyzed; ~ alternatly:s stmh as II toll road may. also be anu~d. All jurisdictions will then review this inBnnation m~d ~ow exactly how much reduction in development or gmx~h m~agement/control {s needed to meet the TSOs. The_gro~ll ~8nagem~nt study and a~.tmpn~:t fees would ta~hhav~ to be ppproyM ununimoVs~. Violations Or projected yiolattons o~T~Q ~tandards rcmah~in~ uffcr a gro~h ma~ag~ment strategy is adopte¢..shall be resolved as discussed .on p. 23Zof the, PJnn, Page 235, first i}aragraph: Delete the last senlence regarding indirect effects on growth. Pflgo 235, third par ~graph,/ltird sentence: Revise as follows: In Al.ameda Cou,ty, th,: jurisdiction with the TSO violation cm~ elect to modify growth rates, :raprove the facility, or seek a lower 'rSo standard through the [ ] process set forth [ ] on p. 237 of the Plan. Page 237, third paragraph: Delete the third.sentence beginning with "nevertheless" regarding indirect effects on growth. Again, we would like to tlmnk you and the TVTC for doing such a commendable job. Please do not hesitate to eall ll' you have any questions on thes~ materials. ' ly Ouy ~6uston Mayor GH/MSImb City Council Richard C. Ambrose, City Mm~ager Elizabeth Silver. Ctty Attorney Lee S, Thoirlpson, Public Works Director Laurence Tong, Plmming Director Melu'art Sepehri, Sr. Civil Engineer Carol Cirelli, Sr. Plmmer ~:~corte~Xmehr~n\O3 1 ~Vta