HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 Att 3 Public Comments Received Seth Adams
Subject: FW: PLPA-2013-00063
From: Robert S.Enea
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:50 PM
To: Luke Sims
Subject: PLPA-2013-00063
Hi Luke,
I own part of the shopping center across the street from the former Goodguys Building.
Please note my property does not have an existing reciprocal parking agreement with the applicant's property,
therefore no allocation of my parking spaces should be used to calculate off-site parking availability.
I just received this notice on Friday, December 13th and have several questions, concerns and comments:
1.) Why wasn't a parking required to determine the impact of the proposed use?
2.) The last "Indoor Recreational Facility" use that was proposed at this site was denied by the planning
commission for related parking and safety issue.
3.) In the past the City has determined offsite parking at this site is unsafe because of the heavy traffic
generated on Amador Plaza Road by the off/on ramp and the BART station.
3.) Why would the current proposed use be deemed a "Minor Use Permit" and not subject to public
hearing?
In the last several years a health club was proposed at this site and rejected by the Planning Commission
because there was not enough onsite parking to support that use.
Also in the last several years a Bowling Alley was proposed on the site and rejected by the Planning
Commission because there was not enough onsite parking to support that use.
In the past, Public Works and Planning have determined that any use proposed on the subject site must be able
to accommodate 100% of the parking requirement onsite.
Without the benefit of site specific parking study, how can you make the determination that the proposed
"Indoor Recreational" can in fact be parked 100% onsite?
Please contact me at your earliest convenience.
Best Regards,
Robert
Robert S.Enea
Enea Properties Company
einginaffinijniMie
1
ATTACHMENT 3
IPINIIMIMMINS
IIIIMINIPIMIININOr
2
Seth Adams
Subject: FW: Comments on Project PLPA-2013-00063
From: Tejas Saraiya ]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:58 AM
To: Jeff Baker; Luke Sims
Subject: Comments on Project PLPA-2013-00063
To City of Dublin Community Development Department:
I would like to express my concern about PROJECT: PLPA-2013-00063 Guns, Fishing, and Other Stuff Minor
Use Permit. I believe this permit should not be approved for the following reasons:
* It conflicts with the City of Dublin's own branding initiative
(http://www.ci.dublin.ca.us/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=925)
* Even gun enthusiasts are speaking out against the the applicant "Guns, Fishing, and Other Stuff'
(http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=866016)
Thank you for your consideration.
Tejas Saraiya
Fortezza Ct
i
Seth Adams
Subject: FW: indoor shooting rang
From: Rohit Vij
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Jeff Baker; Luke Sims
Subject: indoor shooting rang
Hello Jeff and Luke,
I would like to express my support for having an indoor shooting range in Dublin. Simply for the sake of this
being an interesting activity, and there is none in this area. It will put Dublin on the map of a lot of enthusiasts.
Thanks,
Rohit Vij
Dublin, CA 94568
Founder and Administrator, local community Portal:
Proposed indoor shooting range in Dublin (comments due 12/20/13)
* Please send comments to Jeff.Bakera,dublin.ca.gov and luke.sims(c dublin.ca.gov or(925) 833-6610
1
Seth Adams
Subject: FW: Proposed indoor shooting range.
From: Ramesh Sudini [
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:58 PM
To: Jeff Baker -
Subject: Proposed indoor shooting range.
Dear Mr Baker,
I would like to oppose the proposed "Indoor shooting range". Please let me know if I need to do anything more
to get my voice heard.
Thank you
Ramesh Sudini
i
Seth Adams
Subject: FW:Against Shooting range
From: Suraj Dudhoria E ]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:05 PM
To: Luke Sims; Jeff Baker
Subject: Against Shooting range
As Dublin homeowners,we are against the proposed shooting range in Dublin. We do not feel that Dublin is suitable
location for the proposed range.
Suraj & Nlharika Dudhoria
Dublin, CA 94568
1
Seth Adams
II
Subject: FW: Comments - Proposed indoor shooting range in Dublin
From: Nitesh Gandhi [
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:55 PM
To: Jeff Baker; Luke Sims
Subject: Comments - Proposed indoor shooting range in Dublin
Dear Sir,
I am a resident of Dublin Ranch and writing this email to request your kind attention to our concerns on a proposed indoor
shooting range in Dublin, California.
There are 3 to 4 Elementary schools close to our community (Kolb, John Green, etc.)and we are quite concerned about
having a shooting range in Dublin, close to our home or schools. I know that this indoor shooting range may not mean that
our safety is compromised but still this creates a risk to our family and peace.
We request you to deny this application from anyone trying to set up this facility considering larger interest of the
community. This facility should be allowed only close to a police station and that will ensure strict compliance with the
rules and regulations and not next to a residential community.
We appreciate your kind attention to our concerns.
Thanks!
Nitesh
1
Seth Adams
Subject: FW: Shooting range
From: Jeevan Vaidya
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 6:57 AM
To: Jeff Baker; Luke Sims
Subject: Shooting range
I have been a homeowner in Dublin for almost 10 years now, and a shooting range is certainly NOT the kind of
business I want to see in my town.
Jeevan Vaidya
i