Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 051-93 EDub GPA/SP EIRRESOLUTION NO. 51 -93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE ADDENDUM AND THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN Recitals 1. In response to a proposal for residential development of the Dublin Ranch property, the City of Dublin undertook the Eastern Dublin Study to plan for the future development of the eastern Dublin area. 2. The City Council and Planning Commission conducted three joint public study sessions and three workshops relating to planning issues in eastern Dublin. a. The April 18, 1990, study session considered a land use concept report containing four land use scenarios and the consistency of each land use concept with existing general plan policies. Alternative #4 was considered the preferred land use concept for environmental study by informal consensus. b. The August 22, 1990, study session considered Alternative #4 and a fifth concept (based on the 1986 annexation agreement with Alameda County). The "Town Center" concept, types of streets, location and types of parks were discussed. c. The November 15, 1990, workshop solicited comments from the public regarding the existing and desired life style qualities in Dublin and what the public wanted to see in a new community. d. The December 6, 1990, workshop continued with a similar discussion of desired types of commercial development and discussed circulation systems and parks and open space. e. The December 18, 1990, workshop presented preliminary conceptual land use plan. Input was received on the transit spine, location of civic center, types of residential uses, location of commercial uses, the concentration of high density residential uses, and jobs/housing balance. f. The February 14, 1991, study session considered a land use plan that incorporated comments made at the three workshops and included a discussion of major issues, such as the location of a high school, connection to existing Dublin, size of streets and'types of parks. 1 3. With the identification of a preferred alternative on February 14, 1991, the City prepared a Draft General Plan Amendment for approximately 6,920 acres and a Draft Specific Plan for approximately 3,328 acres. 4. The City completed an Initial Study on the project and determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required. A Notice of Preparation dated September 12, 1988, was prepared, published in a newspaper of general circulation and mailed to Responsible Agencies and various other interested parties. A subsequent Notice of Preparation, dated October 16, 1991, was distributed in the same manner. 5. A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared on the project, including the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, sphere of influence changes, prezoning, annexation to the City and the Dublin San Ramon Services District, and detachment from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District. The Draft Environmental Impact Report consisted of two volumes -- a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Part I) and the Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendix (Part II), both volumes dated August 28, 1992. A Notice of Completion was filed with the State Secretary of Resources via the State Clearinghouse on August 28, 1992 (SCH No. 91103064). 6. The Draft Environmental Impact Report was initially circulated for a 45-day public/agency review period beginning on August 28, 1992, and ending on October 13, 1992, and was extended for an additional 16-day period to October 29, 1992. Public notice of the availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Report was published in a newspaper of general circulation and posted on and off the project site. 7. The City of Dublin Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on September 21, 1992, which hearing was continued to September 23, 1992, September 29, 1992 and October 1, 1992. At these hearings, and through submitted written comments, the Planning Commission received comments on the Draft EIR from the public, responsible agencies, other governmental and private organizations, as well as from City staff and its consultants and property owners and their consultants. 8. The City prepared responses to comments on environmental issues received during the public review period and at the public hearings, which responses clarify and amplify the information contained in the Draft EIR, providing good faith reasoned analysis supported by factual information. The comments and responses to comments were published in two parts, on December 7, 1992, and December 21, 1992, and were distributed to or otherwise made available to the Planning Commission, Responsible Agencies, and other interested parties. 9. The Planning Commission reviewed specific text revisions to the Draft EIR and directed that portions of the comments and responses be incorporated into the Final EIR. 10. An Addendum to the Draft Environmental Impact Report dated May 4, 1993, ("Addendum") has been prepared which is attached to the Final Environmental Impact Report. 11. A.~Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the City, which~consists of: (a) Draft Environmental Impact Report (Part I) dated August 28, 1992; (b) Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendix (Part II) dated August 28, 1992); (c) (d) Letter from DKS Associates to Laurence Tong dated December 15, 1992; and Responses to Comments dated December 7, 1992, and December 21, 1992. 12. On May 10, 1993, the City Council considered the Addendum with the Final Environmental Impact Report and the Planning Commission's recommendation for certification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: A. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. B. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Addendum with the Final Environmental Impact Report. The City Council hereby finds and certifies the Addendum and the Final Environmental Impact Report are complete, adequate, and in compliance with CEQA and the City of Dublin's Environmental Guidelines and reflect the independent judgment of the City Council and the City as the lead agency. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of May, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Burton, Houston, Howard, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: 114\RESOL\Z9\CERTIF2.EST 4