Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 019-92 DBX AD 91-1RESOLUTION NO. 19-92 RESOLUTION. APPROVING AMENDED REPORT AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: This City Council has taken a series of actions preliminary to ordering the improvement in Dublin Boulevard Extension Assessment District 91-1, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, and now makes the following findings and orders: 1. The City Council adopted a map showing the boundaries of the land benefited by the proposed improvement. A copy of the boundary map was filed in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Alameda in the Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts. 2. The City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention to order the improvement described therein under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and directed the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, as the Engineer of Work for the assessment district, to prepare the report required by Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. The improvement is generally described as follows: All those proposed public improvements within Tract 4978 and the proposed Tract 5900. These include curbs, gutters, sidewalk, pavement, street monuments, drainage, street lights, street trees, signs, striping, irrigation, and related miscellaneous improvements on Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard extended. The construction of the westerly one-half of the road which is to be on either side of the Chabot Channel. The limits of these improvements are from the end of the existing cul-de- sac north to the improvements of Dublin Boulevard extended, the reconfiguration of the cul-de-sac bulb to a through street, and changing of the driveway entrance at Scarlett Court to street curb returns. The construction of the Extension of Dublin Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Tract 4978, together with the necessary right-of-way to construct these public improvements. The five-foot widening on the east side of Dougherty Road from Dublin Boulevard extended north to Tract 4978. The acquisition of right-of-way for the above. improvements' in Items 1 and 2. The miscellaneous costs involved in the engineering, legal process, and financing. 3. The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed, and the City Council called a hearing on'the report as required by Section 10301 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of the hearing was given by publication, by street posting and by mailing to affected property owners, all according to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. Affidavits of publication, posting and mailing were filed with the City Clerk. 4. At the time and place for which notice was given, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to object to the proposed improvement, the extent of the assessment district, or the proposed assessment. Following the hearing, at the direction of the City Council the Engineer of Work filed an amended report. 5. The City Council 'finds that written protests against the proposed improvement have not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement. 6. The documents and events described in paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, are stated here in tabular form, with their dates and, where appropriate, their numbers. All documents are now on file with the City Clerk. Document or Event Date Number a. Resolution approving boundary map b. Boundary map filed with County Recorder c. Resolution of Intention d. Filing of Engineer's Report e. Resolution accepting Report f. Certificate of Mailing Notice of Improvement g. Affidavit of publication of Notice of Improvement h. Certificate of posting Notice of Improvement i. Public hearing conducted 12/23/91 133-91 02/19/92 Filed 12/23/91 135-91 01/21/92 Filed 01/21/92 5-92 01/23/92 Filed 01/25/92 Filed 01/24/92 Filed 02/24/92 7. The City Council approves the Amended Engineer's Report and-- each component part of it, including each exhibit incorporated by reference in the report. 8. The City Council finds that the Engineer of Work in the Amended Engineer's Report has.fairly and properly apportioned~the cost of the improvement to each parcel of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received. by each parcel, respectively, from the improvement. The City Council hereby confirms and levies each individual assessment as stated in. the Amended Engineer's Report. 9. This City Council orders the improvement described in paragraph 2 and as detailed in the Amended Engineer's Report. 10. Bonds representing unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10, Streets and Highways Code), and the last installment of the bonds shall mature not to exceed twenty-four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. 11. According to Section 10603 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City designates the City Treasurer to collect and receive payment of the assessments. The property owners who elect to pay their assessments in cash before the issuance of improvement bonds will not be required to pay their pro rata share of the allowance for special reserve fund, allowance for bond discount and allowance for capitalized interest. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: Councilmembers Burton, Howard, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder 3