HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 7.3 Calif for Better Trans Membership logo'(0
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 11, 1985
SUBJECT Membership in Californians for Better Transportation
EXHIBITS ATTACHED Letter from Jack D . Maltester, President , Californians
4
for Better Transportation dated February 8, 1985 ;
League of CA Cities Bulletin dated February 8 , 1985
RECOMMENDATION Consider membership
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Membership Fee - $250. 00
A budget transfer would be required from the City
Council ' s Advertising Account to the City Council ' s
Membership & Dues Account in that amount
DESCRIPTION At the regular City Council meeting on February 25 ,
1985 , the City Council considered a proposal for membership in Californians
for Better Transportation. This organization is undertaking a public aware-
ness campaign which will focus on the needs for improved transportation
throughout the State . The focus of this campaign is legislation proposed by
Senator Foran (SB 290) .
The proposed legislation is a major transportation finance bill which was
introduced on January 30, 1985 . The measure includes : a 50 gas tax
increase effective January 1 , 1987; a $250 million guarantee for transit
from the State General Fund ; an increase in truck weight fees ; an index
which would increase transportation funding when the purchasing power of
funds were eroded by rising construction costs ; and a fare box incentive for
transit operators .
Traditionally, gas taxes have been used to generate funds for construction
and maintenance of the state ' s transportation systems. As a major revenue
source , gas taxes have been impacted by several changes in the economy.
This has included the legislative difficulties with increasing the tax and
the limit in the revenue source expansion due to more efficient automobiles .
The City Council requested additional information related to the services
which will be provided to members of Californians for Better Transportation.
Representatives of the organization have stated that their activities will
include editorial board briefings in major media markets , development of
countywide committees to support funding increases , development of infor-
mation and press kits , establishment of a speaker' s bureau, development of a
newsletter, information related to transportation legislation, and access to
a transportation finance consulting service . The specific frequency of any
publications has not been determined, however, the general intent is to
develop a statewide public awareness campaign spotlighting the problems of
transit and local roads .
The second area of concern raised by the City Council was the question of
the expenditure of public funds in an area which may be interpreted as
legislative lobbying. The Californians for Better Transportation have
specifically stated that City funds would not be used for lobbying purposes .
The focus of these funds would be on the public awareness campaign. It
should be noted that many of the State ' s larger cities expend funds on
legislative lobbyists who represent a city' s interest in proposals which
would impact their operations . Smaller cities often pool resources through
associations such as the League of CA Cities . These groups do not provide
contributions to State Legislators as do some of the private sector lobbying
organizations . Instead , their focus is on explaining the cities ' interest
and assisting in developing new legislative proposals of interest to public
agencies .
The City Attorney has reviewed State Law related to this area and has
indicated that it would not be a conflict . The public funds would be
utilized for promoting an awareness of the need for additional
transportation funding.
Staff requests that the City Council consider the additional information and
determine whether the Council wishes to enlist the City as a member of
Californians for Better Transportation.
�-j COPIES TO :
ITEM NO. /• 3
Californighs for Better Trar portation
... Working Together to Keep Californians on the Move
KEVIN C. ECKERY
Executive Director
February 8 , 1985 E ► V E D
BOARD OF [t E C
DIRECTORS 1 5 A985
Jack D. Maltester
President
George P. Griffith Mr. Richard C. Ambrose
CITY of �...
Vice President City Manager
Al Hollinden P.O. Box 2340
Second Vice President Dublin, CA 94568
Jerry Cremins
Secretary Dear Mr. Ambrose:
John C. Beckett
Treasurer Three years ago, the Legislature passed and Governor
Brown signed into law SB 215 (Foran) . The resulting
revenue increases and formula changes were regarded
as essential to the integrity of transportation, and
ADVISORY many people felt that the problem of transportation
COMMITTEE finance in this state had been solved.
Ross Barrett
Metromedia, Inc. But they were wrong.
Don Benninghoven In 1981, when Californians for Better Transportation
League of California Cities was formed, the State Transportation Improvement Plan
Harry V. Cheshire (STIP) was $2.4 billion in the red. Today, studies
Automobile Club of by the Assembly Office of Research, the Governor' s
Southern California
Task Force on Infrastructure, Caltrans, and others
Gilbert F. Decker show a repair backlog for local streets totalling
TRW, Inc. over $4.5 billion--nearly twice the deficit that led
Ivan Hinderaker to the widespread support for SB 215.
University of California,
Riverside In Alameda County, cities are falling 80 to 90% short
Cornell C. Maier of their road maintenance needs. The City of
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Oakland, for example, was only able to repave 13.3
Robert W. Murray miles of roadway last year, out of some 645 miles in
Whittaker Corporation need of attention.
R.W. Rood
Atlantic Richfield Public transit is in trouble, too. The high demand
James C. Schmidt for bus and rail service is outstripping the ability
Great American Federal to purchase vehicles and train drivers. In Los
T.J. Stapleton Angeles, for instance, daily patronage on public
Operating Engineers, Local 3 transit has increased by more than 600,000 riders, to
the point where buses in Los Angeles County carry
more than 2 million people a day. This, at the same
time Congress considers budget cuts that would wipe
out or reduce all operating and capital assistance.
1118 Tenth Street • Sacramento, California 95814 • (916) 446-3275
4:)
This is why CBT has begun a new public awareness
campaign spotlighting the problems of transit and
local roads. We want to educate the public so that
they will understand the needs and support new
funding in the future. The outlook for success is
good but, like most things, it will require money.
The minimum budget is estimated to be $150,000; but
in a tough fight, that could easily double.
As the Mayor Emeritus of San Leandro and a former
President of the League of California Cities, I hope
your city will consider supporting this campaign by
joining CBT. A $250 to $1,000 membership from each
city in California would allow CBT to effectively
convey the proven transportation funding needs of
local government.
Californians for Better Transportation is not a
lobbying organization. It is a non-profit,
tax-exempt corporation supported by business, trade
unions, and government agencies concerned about
transportation. City funds would not be used for
lobbying purposes (A membership roster is attached) .
California cities need a break. With your help, we
can show how important good transportation is to the
overall well-being of a community, and the disastrous
impact poor transportation would have on economic
development.
Please read the enclosed material. If you need
further information, please get in touch with me or
CBT Executive Director, Kevin Eckery at (916 )
446-3275.
Sincerely,
Jack D. Maltester
P.S. : Memberships fall in the following population
groups:
200 ,000 and above $1,000.00
100,000 to 199,999 750.00
25, 000 to 99,999 500.00
24,999 and below 250.00
(Please send checks to our Sacramento office noted on
letterhead) .
•
•air
■a111z
;;M; League of California Cities
u m ni- 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO,CA 95814 • (916)444-5790
11111111111-` Sacramento, California
California Cities February 8, 1985
Work Together
TO: City Managers
FROM: Don Benninghoven, Executive Director
RE: Transportation Financing and The Californians for Better Transportation
The 1984 Legislative Session was one of major accomplishment. The local
government finance package passed last year now permits cities to make reasonable
long-term financial plans for city operations. This stability is finally achieved
after six years of post-Proposition 13 financial turmoil.
With the operating side of city budgets in reasonably stable condition, time has
arrived to address the deterioration of our city public works facilities. Many
people argue that the real victims of recent city financial problems have been our
streets, roads, transit, water, sewer and park systems. Capital budgets to
support these facilities were cut or eliminated; maintenance necessary to guard
the public's investment was deferred. This growing problem can no longer be
ignored without multiplying the price tag for repair and expansion.
On the top of any list of city public works needs is our local transportation
system, i.e., streets, roads, and transit.
The Californians for Better Transportation (CBT) is spearheading an effort this
session to secure funding for that portion of our public works facilities in most
desperate need: the transportation system. CBT is a coalition of interests.
concerned about the inadequacy and deterioration of our transportation system in
California. The League of California Cities is a member of the CBT and has been
since its inception. CBT was formed to direct the public's attention on this
growing problem in California's transportation system and has dedicated its
1 efforts over the past three years to that purpose.
CBT is focusing its efforts this year on a push to pass Senate Bill 290 (Foran).
This is a major transportation-finance proposal introduced in the California
Legislature on January 30, 1985. The measure does the following:
1. Five-Cent Gas Tax Increase. Two of the five cents goes to the state and three
cents to cities and counties; the increase will take effect on January 1,
1987.
2. $250 Million Transit Guarantee. A state general fund guarantee for transit of
$250 million per year; this constitutes an increase of approximately $140
million over current funding levels and will take effect in the 1985-86 budget
year.
3. Truck Weight Fees. An increase of 50 percent in weight fees for all trucks,
except pickups. This is estimated to produce approximately $80 million and
this revenue will go to the state.
0
. 0
4. Modified Index: . A modified index to trigger the Governor and Legislature to
act in the budget to increase transportation funding when the purchasing power
of transportation funds is eroded by rising construction costs.
5. Fare Box Incentive. A financial Transit Assistance
the local when a transit system generates ocal
fare box.
While the legislative lobbying effort to push SB 290 will be the responsibility of
CBT members such as the League, County Supervisors Association, Associated General
Contractors, California Publicly Owned Transit Systems, and, most
importantly,numerous California business community representatives, the CBT
organization will perform the vital role of developing public support for SB 290.
Without that support, it will be impossible to get the Legislature and the
Governor to seriously consider the bill.
CBT is asking League member cities to join the organization. A CBT member can
expect the following services:
1. Editorial Board Briefings in California's major media markets by CBT
members from public and private sector on the transportation funding
crisis.
2. Development of countywide committees to support a transportation funding
increase.
3. Information and analysis in press kits to support countywide committee
efforts with local community groups and the media.
4. Speakers Bureau on Transportation Funding issues.
5. Access to information and activities of statewide business and public
sector interest groups involved in transportation funding effort.
6. CBT Newsletter on pertinent transportation finance issues. .
7. CBT update on transportation related legislation.
8. Access to CBT transportation finance consulting service for local inquiry
and research issues.
1 The League supports the CBT effort to solicit more city membership. The CBT
organization will provide the critical support effort needed if there is any hope
for the passage of SB 290. A package of information on CBT is enclosed for your
review. We encourage you to review this information and to join as a member of
the Californians for Better Transportation.
Californians for Better Transportation
Working Together to Keep Californians on the Move
KEVIN C. ECKERY
Executive Director
MEMBERSHIP ROSTER
Aggregates & Concrete Assn. County Supervisors Association
of Northern California of California
American Medical International CPS Partnership
Ameron Daley Corporation
Associated General Contractors Daniel, Mann, Johnson &
of California Mendenhall
Astec Industries, Inc. DeLeuw, Cather and Company
Atkinson, Guy F. Construction Diani, A. J. Construction
Atlantic Richfield Dilorio, Joseph N.
Automobile Club of Southern Edgington Oil Company
California ESL, Inc.
Baker International Corporation Fait, Kenneth E.
Bank of America Farmer, Justin F.
Barton-Aschman Associates Fenton, H.G. Material Company
Basalt Rock Products First American Title Insurance
Bay Area Coalition for Company
Transportation Fluor Corporation
Bay Area Rapid Transit District Fontana Paving, Inc.
Brutoco Engineering and Foundation Constructors, Inc.
Construction, Inc. Gallagher & Burk, Inc.
Bullock's Genstar Cement & Lime Company
Butler, Roy Getty Oil Company
California Asphalt Pavement Assn Grade-Way Construction
California Assn. of Publicly Granite Construction Company
Owned Transit Systems Great American First Savings
California Building Industry Bank
Association Greek, Don & Associates
California Institute of Public Griffith Company
Transportation Grossmont Bank
California Portland Cement Co. Hacienda Business Park Owners
California Railroad Association Association
California Trucking Association Haskell, John
Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. Hawley, L.S. Corporation
Chadwick & Buchanan, Inc. Hazard, R.E. Contracting Company
Chevron, U.S.A. Hermreck, M.J. , Inc.
Chicago Title Insurance Company Hewlett-Packard
of San Diego Hinderaker, Ivan
Chumo Construction, Inc. Hollinden, Al
Church Engineering, Inc. Huntway Refining Company
Clorox Company IBM Corporation
Conrock Company Independent Construction Company
Construction Industry Research Industrial Asphalt
Board Irvine Company
_ ' -°
0 0
Johnson Tractor Company Penhall International
Jones, Gordon B. Peterson, Dan J.
K West Engineering and Pick, Art
Contracting, Inc. PRC Engineering
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Ransome Company
Kahn, Robert Regional Transit, Sacramento
Kasler Corporation Richter, Ruth
Keces, Mery Roberts, Earl V.
Kiewit Pacific San Bernardino Association of
Kimmel, Herman & Associates Governments
Lawrence, Bill San Diego Fence Company
League of California Cities San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Long Beach Transit San Diego Metropolitan Transit
Lockheed Corporation Development Board
Lone Star Industries San Diego Rock Producers
Los Angeles County Association
Transportation Commission Santa Clara County
Los Angeles District Council Transportation Agency
of Carpenters Schlaefli , Andrew P.
Marconi, William Schmidt, James C.
Matich Corporation Schultz, Thomas G. , Ph.D.
Maxwell, W.F. , Inc. Security Pacific National Bank
McClain, Bruce W. Segerstrom, C.J. & Sons
McKean, Keith E. Sentinels
Mendel Associates, Inc. Shell Oil Company
Merced County Department of Simmons, Thomas N.
Public Works Southern California Contractors
Metromedia, Inc. Association
Metropolitan Transportation Southern California District
Commission Council of Laborers
Moseman Construction Southern California Gas Company
Nelson & Belding Contracting Southern California Rapid Transit
Corporation District
Nelson & Sloan Southern California Rock
Nelson, William E. Products Association
Newman & Sons So. California Transportation
Noble, R.J. Company Action Committee
Novo-Rados Southern Pacific Transportation
Operating Engineers, Local 3 Company
Operating Engineers, Local 12 Southwestern Portland Cement
Pacific Gas & Electric Company Company
Parsons, Brinkerhoff , Quade and State Building & Construction
Douglas Trades Council of California
Sully-Miller Contracting Company
Superior Gunite
TRW, Inc.
Taxicab Paratransit Association
of California
Teichert, A. & Son, Inc.
Ticor
Underground Construction Company
Union Oil Company
Utility Industrial Supply, Inc.
Watt Industries
Whittaker Corporation
Wilberg, Dennis
Wood, Claude C. Company, Inc.
Woods, Doyle
Young, William P. , Inc.
Zoraster, Albert