HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-076 RnbwInvstmntReZn 08-17-1987TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 17, 1987
Planning Commission
Planning St~ ~ ~
PA 87-0~Rainbow Investment Company Rezoning
request <C-O, Administrative Office District to
C-I~ Retail Business District~
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNER:
LOCATION:
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER:
GENERAL PLaN
DESIGNATION:
LXISTING ZONING
~YD I~ND USE:
Rezoning request to rezone a 1.3~ acre partially
developed property from a C-O, Administrative
Office District to a C-l, Retail Business
District.
Robert F. Glockner
dba Rainbow Investment Co.
690 Industrial Road
San Carlos, CA 94070
7601 Amador Valley Boulevard
Dublin, CA 94568
941-173-01-6
Commercial/Industrial - Retail/Office
Current Zoning is C-O, Administrative Office
District. The site is partially developed,
containing two single-story office structures
totaling 3,880~ square feet in size, previously
occupied by Great Western.
SURROUNDING LAND USE
AND ZONING: North:
South:
East:
West:
R-S-D-20 (Suburban Residence Combining
District) - DSRSD Fire Station and
Residential Apartments
C-1 (Retail Business District) - ~ador
Valley Boulevard and Dublin Library, and
mixed retail uses~
R~S-D-3 (Suburban Residential Combining
District) - Residential Apartments
R-S-D-20 (Suburban Residential Combining
District) - Medical Clinic, Residential
Apartments, and mixed retail uses;
ZONING HISTORY:
The Site was initially developed in 1965 with the construction of a
single story 1,750~ square foot structure for Salinas Valley Savings.
Development was limited to a long, generally rectangular portion of the site
(a 90+ ft. x 290~ ft. parcel, with the long property alignment fronting along
Amado~ Valley Boulevard). Site development included establishment of two
dead-end parking areas (each with 14 parking spaces) which were established on
either side of the structure and served respectively by single driveway
connections to Starwood Drive and Donahue Drive.
~ & COPIES TO: Applicant/Owner
ITEM NO. 0 File PA 87-076
In May of 1972, a 750~ square foot addition was made to the north side
of the structure. The addition included establishment of drive-thru window
banking service. This service was made possible by establishing a one-way
driveway connection between the two previously developed parking areas.
In October of 1973, an 1,100~ square foot freestanding single story
"Community Room" was added to the site along the east side of the original
structure. The two structures were interconnected with a raised exterior
walkway and a covered patio area. The Community Room occupied the majority of
the eastern parking area, and as such prompted the development of a new twenty
space parking area within the undeveloped property along Donahue Drive. This
new parking area was serviced by a new driveway connection to Donahue Drive.
The two driveway connections to Donahue Drive were signed as one-way driveways
(with the southerly driveway being an entrance and the northerly drive being
an exit.) Sometime following the installation of ATM service at the southwest
corner of the original structure, the drive-thru banking window service was
disconnected. This allowed a more accessible, but one-way, driveway
interconnection between the on-site parking areas.
The piece-meal development of the site has resulted in the creation of
awkward and inefficently laid out on-site circulation and parking areas.
Approximately 20% of the site is currently undeveloped (an irregularly
shaped area comprising 12,000~ square feet at the northwest corner of the
property).
The existing structures on the site are currently unoccupied. The
building and support site work are in comparatively good shape. The size and
design of the structures (single-story structures with wooden siding and with
1:3 sloped wooden shake roofs) are compatible with adjoining and neighboring
apartment developments.
Eh~IRONMENTAL REVIEW: The City proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance which finds the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment.
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the August 17, 1987, hearing was published in
The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public
buildings.
ANALYSIS:
The Applicant is requesting approval of a Rezoning request to rezone a
1.3+ partially developed property from a C-O, Administrative Office District
to a C-i, Retail Business District. The site lies just beyond (north) of the
lands involved with the recently adopted Dublin Downtown Specific Plan.
The site directly abuts the eastern parking area of the 60-unit two-
story Greenwood Apartment Complex. A portion of the northern boundary of the
site abuts the 1/3~ acre DSRSD - Donahue fire station facility. Across
Donahue Drive from the site is a 20-unit two-story apartment complex.
Although lying outside the formal boundary of the Dublin Downtown
Specific Plan Area, the site's proximity to the Plan Area mandanes than land
uses ultimately allowed on the site and development criteria established for
such uses be reviewed to assure they will not be inconsistent with the goals
and objectives established by the Plan. The proximity to the existing
apartment complexes also dictates that special care be taken in the
development of land use and development criteria established through the
rezoning process for this site. The Zoning Regulations for the C-1 District
generally permit more intensive land uses than the Zoning Regulations for the
existing C-O District. Taken in combination, these factors raise a Staff
concern that a straight application of the C-l, Retail Business District land
use and development criteria may not be appropriate. Use of the C-1 District
standards may not provide a level of sensitivity for land use guidelines for
the site reflective of its site specific characteristics.
-2-
To that end, Staff recommends that a modified C-l, Retail Business
District be applied to the site through the application of a site-specific PD,
Planned Development Zoning District. This approach would allow the permitted
land uses and conditionally permitted land uses applied to the site through
the rezoning process to be more reflective of site specific considerations
then would be otherwise established. Specifically, it is Staff's recommenda-
tion that the uses listed in Sections 8-48.1 (Permitted uses: C-1 Districts)
and 8-48.2 (Conditional Uses: C-1 Districts) be adjusted to delete potential
uses that would not appear to be appropriate for this site. Additionally,
Staff recommends the PD, Planned Development District applied to the site
establish site specific development criteria reflecting such things as setback
requirements, building height and coverage restrictions and landscaping
standards.
Background Attachments #9 - ~13 have been taken from the Dublin Downtown
Specific Plan and are supplied to provide background information of the
Specific Plan as it relates to the subject property. Of specific interest are
the following points:
A. Diagram 4 - Circulation Improvements (Attachment ~9) details the
proposed new traffic signal at Amador Valley Boulevard and Amador Plaza
Road. With any approvals for intensification of the development on the
subject property, the Developer should be required to contribute towards
this future traffic signal.
Diagram 8 - Land Use Objective (Attachment ~10) indicates that the
subject property immediately adjoins the area identified by the Specific
Plan which is appropriate to accommodate greater development densities
due to a presence of less traffic congestion. Redevelopment and
intensification of the subject property appears to be consistent with
this direction.
Diagram 9 - Development Zones Map and Table C - Development Standards
(respectively marked as Attachments #11 and #12) provide direction for
land uses (and floor area ratio and building height standards ) for the
Development Zones in closest proximity to the subject property. As
regards their location at the periphery of the Specific Plan and
proximity to existing residential uses, Development Zones 9 and 11
appear to be most comparable to the subject property.
Diagram 12 - Special Site Development Requirements (Attachment ~t3)
indicates that the Specific Plan calls for imposition of a two-story
height restriction for structures located in close proximity with
existing residential properties.
RECO~IENDATION:
F 0 P~ T:
ACTION:
1)
5)
Hear Staff presentation.
Open public hearing.
Hear Applicant and public presentations.
Close public hearing.
Consider and act on two Draft Resolutions.
Draft Resolution regarding the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance for PA 87-076.
Draft Resolution regarding the PD, Planned Development
Rezoning request PA 87-076.
Based on the above Staff report, Staff recommends the Planning
Commission adopt the following two Resolutions: Exhibit A which
recommends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration of
Environment Significance for PA 87-076 and Exhibit B with
recommends that the City Council rezone the subject property to a
PD, Planned Development District.
-3-
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A:
Draft Resolution Recommending the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for PA
87-076
Exhibit B: Draft Resolution Recommending the City Council rezone the
subject property to a PD, Planned Development District
Exhibit C: Draft Ordinance for PA 87-076
Exhibit D: Site Plan pertaining to Rezoning Request
Background Attachments:
1 - Zoning Map
2 - Copy of Applicant's Written Statement
3 - Environmental Assessment Form
4 - Negative Declaration of Environment Significance for PA 87-076
5 - Pertinent Agency Comments
6 - Site Photographs and Photo Key Map
7 - Section of Zoning Ordinance pertaining to C-l, Retail Business
District
8 - Diagram 4 - Circulation Improvements - Dublin Downtown Specific
Plan
9 - Diagram 8 - Land Use Objective - Dublin Downtown Specific Plan
10 - Diagram 9 - Development Zones Map - Dublin Downto'~n Specific Plan
11 - Downtown Dublin Development Standards (Draft) - Dublin
Downtown Specific Plan
12 - Special Site Development Requirements - Dublin Downtow~a
Specific Plan
13 - Staff Study - Conceptual Parking Layout - August, 1987
-4-
RESOLUTION NO. 87 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CONCERNING PA 87-076
RAINBOW INVESTMENT COMPANY REZONING APPLICATION
WHEREAS, Robert Glockner filed an application requesting the City
rezone approximately 1.3 acres from C-O, Administrative Office District to a
C-l, Retail Business District: and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as
amended together with the State's Administrative Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental Regulations, requires that certain projects be
reviewed for environmental impact and that environmmental documents be
pYepared; and
WHEREAS, a Nagative Declaration of Environmental Significance has
been prepared'for PA 87-076~ and
WHEREAS, the Staff report was submitted recommending that the
Planning Commission recommend that the City Council rezone the property to a
PD, Planned Development District allowing a general range of C-i, Retail
Business District uses which, along with site specific development criteria,
would be consistent with the goals and objectives identified in the recently
adopted Dublin Downtown Specific Plan and which would also be reflective of the
adjoining sites' potential impacts to the existing residential land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance and considered it at a public hearing
on August 17, 1987; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission determined that the project:
PA 87-076, will not have any significant environmental impacts;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
recommends that the City Council find that the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance has been prepared and processed in accordance with
State and Local Environmental Law and Guideline Regulations, and that it is
adequate and complete.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17nh day of August, 1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Chairperson
Planning Director
RESOLUTION NO. 87 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISH FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
FOR A PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING PA 87-076,
RAINBOW INVESTMENT COMPANY REZONING APPLICATION
WHEREAS, Robert Glockner filed an application to rezone
approximately 1.3 acres from a C-O, Administrative Office District to a C-l,
Retail Business District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on
August 17, 1987; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance has been adopted (Planning Commission
Resolution No. 87 - ) for this project, as it will have no significant
effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Staff report was submitted recommending that the
Planning Commission recommend that the City Council rezone the property to a
PD, Planned Development District allowing a general range of C-l, Retail
Business District uses which, along with site specific development criteria,
would be consistent with the goals and objectives identified in the recently
adopted Dublin Downtown Specific Plan and which would also be reflective of the
adjoining sites' potential impacts to the existing residential land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said
reports, recommendations and testimony herein above set forth; and
WHEREAS, rezoning the property to a PD, Planned Development
District will be appropriate for the subject property in terms of providing a
range of allowable and conditionally allowable uses which will be compatible to
existing and proposed land uses in the immediate vicinity and conforming to the
underlying land use designation; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning will not have a substantial adverse affect on
health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be
injurious to property or public improvement; and
W~HEREAS, the rezoning will not overburden public se~-vices~ and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the PD, Planned Development
Rezoning request subject to the following general provisions:
The subject PD, Planned Development District is established to provide
areas for comparison retail shopping and office uses, with the specific
range of permitted uses to include the following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Retail Stores
Office Uses (as delineated in Section 8-46.1 a) of the Zoning
Ordinance)
Financial Institutions
Service Commercial (including, but not limited to: Barber Shop, Beauty
Parlor, Tailor Shop, Handicraft Shop, Repair Shop for Cameras Shoes,
Watches and Household Applicances)
Conditional uses in the subject PD, Planned Development District permitted
only if approved as provided in Section 8-94.0 of the Zoning Ordinance,
shall include:
a) Community Facility
b) Commercial Recreation Facility, if within a building
c) Hotel, Motel or Boarding House
d) Service Station, Type A
e) Restaurant or Tavern
Minimum setback requirements for new development on the subject property
shall be as follows:
a) Front Yards: For this site, for purposes of calculating setback
requirements and the property's front lot line, the minimum setback
from Amador Valley Boulevard shall be a minimum of 20 feet for single-
story stuctures and a minimum of 25 feet for any structure with a
height in excess of 18 feet.
b) Street-Side Side Yard: The setback from both Starward Drive and
Donahue Drive shall be a minimum of 20 feet, a standard which shall
extend to the mid-point of the radius returns onto kmador Valley
Boulevard.
c) Side and Rear Setbacks: The minimum setbacks along the property's
north and west boundaries shall be 10 feet for one-story structures and
15 feet for structures with a height in excess of 18 feet.
No building established in this PD, Planned Development District shall
exceed a height of two-stories or 35 feet.
No building or buildings estalished in this PD, Planned Development
District shall exceed a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent.
A minimum of 25 percent of the land in this PD, Planned Development
District shall not be occupied by buildings, structures, or pavement, but
shall be landscaped. A minimum of 75 percent of this open area shall be
planted and maintained with growing plants.
Development of any new structure in this PD, Planned Development District,
or any construction activity in the form of exterior building alterations
(beyond minor alterations and/or repairs) or additions involving the
existing structures in the District, shall be subject to Site Development
Review pursuant to Section 8-95.0 of the Zoning Ordinance. Plans submitted
for a Site Development Review application covering this site shall detail
the following site modifications.
a) Elimination of the existing unused drive-thru window roof and support
structure and creation of a two-way on-site driveway connection between
on-site parking areas.
b) Modification of the dimensional layout and striping plan layout for the
westerly parking lot to create a 90-degree, double-loaded parking area
with a raised landscape planter separation between the parking lot and
the adjoining on-site driveway.
c) Elimination of the southerly Donahue Drive driveway with a concurrent
revamping of the eastern parking area to substantially reflect the
layout and dimensions of the 90-degree, double-loaded parking area
detailed in the Staff Study dated August, 1987.
Prior to occupancy of any existing or new structure by a use allowed by
this District, compliance with the following City Engineer recommendations
shall occur:
a) Repair deficiencies in existing frontage improvements such as chipped
and offset sidewalk as required by the City Engineer.
b) Raise low dirt grade to be level with the sidewalk.
c) Remove damaged fence and post at the northeast driveway.
d) Trim landscaping at all driveways so that sight distance for vehicles
entering and exiting the site is not obstructed. Also trim landscaping
that is encroaching on the sidewalk.
10o
Development of any structure in this PD, Planned Development District, or
any construction activity in the form of exterior building alterations
(beyond minor alterations and/or repairs) or additions involving the
existing structures in the District, shall not occur until the Developer
makes a contribution to the planned future signal at Amador Plaza Road and
Amador Valley Boulevard. The amount of contribution shall be determined by
the City Engineer based on increased traffic generated by the project.
Except as specifically modified by the above listed Conditions of
Approval, development and operation of land use activities within this PD,
Planned Development District shall be subject to the guidelines of the
C-l, Retail Business District of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance as
regards both land use restrictions and minimum/maximum development
criteria.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Chairperson
Planning Director
-3-
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT
THE REZONING OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST
CORNERS OF THE INTERSECTION OF AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND DUBLIN BOULEVARD
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
Section 1
Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin Ordinance Code is hereby amended in the
following manner:
Approximately 1.3 acres consisting of lands fronting along the northeast
corner of Starward Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard and the northwest corner of
Donahue Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard, more specifically described as
Assessor's Parcel Number 941-173-1-6, to a PD, Planned Development District; and
PA 87-076 - Rainbow Investment Company, as shown on Exhibit A (Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance), and Exhibit B (Approval, Findings and
General Provisions of the PD, Planned Development Rezoning) on file with the City
of Dublin Planning Department, are hereby adopted as regulations for the future
use, improvement, and maintenance of the property within this District.
A map depicting the rezoning area is outlined below:
Section 2
This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days from and
after its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage,
it shall be published once, with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the same, in The Herald, a newspaper published in Alameda County and
available in the City of Dublin.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council-of the City of Dublin, on this 14th
day of September 1987, by the following votes:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
SEE SHEET lA
]
A
· A PART OF 'THE
ZONING 'MAP
THE 'CIT~' OF
--DUBLIN
ATTACHMENT
"~o~ ~ ~ /1/tt~ Pk gT-O7ro
RAINBOW INVESTMENT COMPANY
0 ? 6
690 Industrial Road · San Carlos. CA 9407u
415 · 594-9378
May 13,1987
Mr. Laurence L. Tong
Planning Director
City of Dublin
6500 Dublin Blvd.
Dublin, CA 94568
Dear Mr. Tong:
The purpose of this submittal is to obtain rezoning of the
property at 7601 Amador Valley Blvd., Dublin, CA 9~566. The
current zoning is C.O., the proposed zoning is C-1. The
location of the property is well suited to retail of C-I
designation, being situated on Amador Valley Blvd., with
convenient access from both Amador Valley Blvd. and Donahue
Street, (a traffic signal is located at this corner). This
request is consistant with the revised version of the longterm
Dublin General Plan.
Our intent is to offer these buildings for lease to retail or
service oriented office users. We are co~ident that the
quality of the existing buildings, the high visability and
convenient location will encourage tennants which wi!! continue
a standard of increasing quality in retail space offered in the
City of Dublin.
Our plan for the future includes further development of the
property to better utilize the available land. CurrrentIy about
half of the property remains underdeveloped. We hope to use
this space to build additional buildings which will increase the
amount of retail space. By using the same building style and
improving the current landscaping we feel that estheticaily this
will be appealing. As these plans become more complete we will
be filing for a Site Development Review.
Thus, in order to bring the l~d at 7601 p~2ador Valley Blvd.
it's greatest potential, we feel that the rezoning as C-1 is
essential. We hope that you will agree.
to
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
RFG:emg
AI'T&CH EflT .
REc£1VED
CITY OF pu~LIR
DUBUN I~ LAI'I,,N~NG
' ENVI FII::]i~MENTAL ASSESSMENT
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 er sec.)
The State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines
require the City to take an active role in preparing environ-
mental documents. This comprehensive Environmental Assessment
Form is designed to assist the Cit~ in preparing a complete and
accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in
conformance with the State CEQA Guidelines- The form has three
sections: General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The
applicant is requested to complete Section 1, General Data. The
Planning Staff will prepare either Section 2, Exemption, or
Section 3, Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink.
PA No. "
FOUr, n, I~TEF--1 M
SECTION 1. GENERAL DATA - - -
to be ccmpleted by the APPLICANT
1. Name (iF any) and address oF proiect: 7601 Amador Valley Bird, Dublin
to lease building for C-1 retail or service
9. Proposed use of properb/:
oriented office use
· 3. Name, address, and telephone a[ Appliconh' Ro~ez-d: F. Giockner
dba. RAINBOW INVESTMENT CO. 690 Indu_~_al Rd. San carlos, CA 940~0
(415l 594~3 378
-~. Nome, address, an~ ~elephone CF COn~ct person ~[n addit[on to cp~J[canf or
[~ instead o~ cppllconh 1. Ellen M. Glcckner/ above address
2. John Orr 1533 N. Main Street, WaLnL~ Creek, CA 94596 (415)
5. A~tached plansorer~pr~Jlmlncp/or~uIIy ~eveloped- (in terms of
' rezoning) -
6. BuHdlng area: 3880 ,_ ~.F~.
7. Site area: 1.3 [] sq. Ft. or~ acres. 8. Currenf zoning: C O
9. Maximum Building He~ght' 35 ~h. arJ-~s:cr[es.
10. Describe amount oF daily troFRc generated by nL'm~er, type and ;,me oF
Unable to determ±ne.
947-5885
11. Number oF oFF-street perking spaces provided: 3i
12. Number oF loading FaclJffies provided: None
ATTACHMENT,-
current rezo'ning requires no' schedule. -.
· ]3. Proposed development schedule: beginning: A'u0us~'8i~,°mpie~lOn: ']~mm '88
]4.0. iF resi~ent[o[: number' oF new 'un[ts ; number o[ ex~:ting unffs ;number o[ ne'e/
' bedrooms ; un[~ s[zes ;range o~ ~ sole prices or ~ ren~s ; type
14.b. Ir c6~erc[a[~ '~cope o[ pr~iect~ ne;shbcrhood, ~ ci~y; ~ reg[oneI .
sales area 3880~-ft- or'acre; esHma~ed employment pershff~ **;h0urs
.. operaHon- ** **Determined by ~ennan~.
14. c. tf [ndustrial: m~teria]s involved '; e~Hma~ed employment per shift
ho6rs o~ 6peraHon
14.d. IF [nstituHona[: ma]or funcHon ; estimated employmen~ per
estimated oc?pan~ ;.hours o[ o~eraHcn
15. Describe Ci~ permDs requ~red:~ fitc ~¢~[o~e< ~vlc~3
] 6. Describe other public approvals required: ~nknowz; ~ locc[ cgenc[es;~ reg[onc[
afienc[e5; ~ s}s~e agenc;es; ~ ~ederal c~enc[es; ~cr
CERTIFICATION
1 hereby certi5/ that the [n,~ormaH°n submitted i.~ true and correc~ to the best o~ my knowledee
and belieF. I understand that the findings o~ th{s Env[ror. men~l Assessmen~ cpply only to ~e
Name (prim or type): Robert f. Glockner dba: Rainbow ? ..... tment Co.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR:
PA 87-076 Rainbow Investment Company
Rezoning Request
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq)
LOCATION:
A 1.3+ acre property fronting along both the
northeast corner of Starward Drive and Amador
Valley Boulevard, and the northwest coner of
Donahue Drive and J~ador Valley Boulevard.
APPLICANT AND
PROPERTY OWNER:
Robert Fo Glockner
dba Rainbow Investment Comopany
690 Industrial Road
San Carlos, CA 94070
DESCRIPTION:
A Rezoning request to rezone 1.3~ acres from a
C-O, Administrative Office District to a C-i,
Retail Business District.
INITIAL STUDY:
The Project Initial Study is available for
review at the City Offices and indicates the
proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment.
MITIGATION MEASURES:
None Required.
PREPARATION:
This Negative Declaration was prepared by the
City of Dublin Planning Staff (415) 829-4916.
SiGNA%VJRE: DATE:
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
'. ~ ' ,-~--~'",;~-~. ~ -~,~ -,'. . ~ ~,, ,~.,~.,~.:.'~r.-~.--~'.~ ..", .t .'~..' , . ~.. "'.'; .' ". .~ - '.. ' ~ ~ .'-- ' ', -~-.~.. ~ -'
..... ~ ~'-'Z~'C,"-~b~' "~'.~{-~'~' ~';~'~ 'b' "! ,';~; CI~ OF DUBLIN z'"-: ..' '' ..... ~'~-~: ':"~.'~ ":'.-~ ....
'-l-~.f .~;;~ '~7~.5,~ m~.~ ~', ' ~: ? ~:r~'~ -'~:~:'0'~ ~ ?~?.-? ';,.,:''.- '.
""'~/~'~?'~'; .... --" . Ju~e ~ ;". ~987
-:,-.~.~:..: ' '~'~..:... ~.; t,~_.:.,:: ~ .- ~[:-. ~,:.~... ,'- ..,.. _ _ . - , ~.
- 5.:.~To: - - '' '-:'~vi~ gailey/'Se'~ion'Planner - ' ........
....
From: City Engineer ..' '
Subject: PA 87-076 Rainbow Investment Co.
1. Repair deficien~ie~ in existing frontage improvements such as c~pped and -
offset sidewalk as required by the City Engineer.
2. Raise low dirt grade to be level with the sidewalk.
-3. Remove damaged fence and post at the northeast driveway.
4. Trim landscaping at ail driveways so that sight distance is not obstructed.
~so trim landscaping t~t is encroac~ng on the sidewalk.
ATTA(:HMENT --
" SITE PHOTOGRA~S (;ert F. Glockner
dba: RAINBOW INVESTMENT'
Location of Photo'grapher
as marked
ASSESSOR'S MAP 941
TRACT 2162{~42 ~}
'17,,.%C T 29441e~.55~.~o}
s~l,,l". ~ TF{, 4 447. ~"~
174
Co8,, Ar,, No.,.2~-001
P
305
- 3 -
q)'7- 0 76
ATTACHMEN'j'
Robert F. Glockner
dba: RAINBOW INVESTMENT CO.
SITE PHOTOS:
7601 Amador Valley Blvd.
Photo
~ECEIVED
Robert F. Glockner
dba: RAINBOW INVESTMENT Co.
SITE PHOTOS:
7601 Amador Valley Blvd.
Photo "B"
RECEIVED
'~?- 076
Robert F. Glockner
dba: RAINBOW INVESTMENT CO.
SITE PHOTOS:
7601 Amador VAlley Blvd.
Photo: "C"
RECEIVED
DL3~.k ] :';--'<: -:
Robert F. ~lockner
dba: RAINBOW INVESTMENT CO.
SITE PHOTOS:
7601 Amador Valley blvd.
Photo: "D"
RECEIVED
:"¥ >'7,-~
'.~ :~ ;
Robert F. Glockner
dba: RAINBOW I}~VESTMENT CO.
SiTE PHOTOS:
7601 Amador Valley blvd.
Photo: "E'
Robert F. Glockner
dba: RAINBOW INVESTMENT CO.
SITE PHOTOS:
7601 Amador VAlley Blvd.
Photo: "F"
· 87- Oq6
Robert F. Glockner
dba: RAINBOW INVESTMENT CO.
SITE PHOTOS:
7601 Amador Valley blvd.
Photo: "G"
RECEIVED
DU~.Li?i .r:__ .?D:'×''~
Photo: "H"
'87-
c-z ~ TS:ZZC-ZS
8-48.0 RETAIL BUSINESS DIS~--RICTS: IN'~.~. Retail Bu~i=ess Districts,
hereinafter designated as C-1 Districts, ara established to provide
areas for comparison retail shopping and office uses, and to enhance
their usefulness By protec'.iag them frcu incs=.aatible types of cor~mer-
rial uses which can be provided for more effectively in the General
Commercial Dis cricks.
(Amended by sec. !, Ord. 68-58)
{"- -.
8-48.1. PERMITTED USE~: C-t DISTRICTS. The fot!ow[n~
Pr~c[~ Us~ are permkted ~n a C-I Dfz~zlct: rah]eot ~c ~he
l~m[tat[cns of Section 8-4S.9:
a) Retail store, exceo[ book store:
b) Office, Bank;
c) Barber shop, beauty parlor mud keau:y school, bu_q-
ne~. school, dressmaking or kn[t~fn% shop, talldr
shoD, c!e~ or laundry a~ency, ha,~c. =~ ~ shop;
d) Reoa~. shoo. for camer~ shoe~, ~,:+~x~, ho~ahold
appliances;
e) Se!f~ervice Iaundry~
f) ~estauran[;
g) Parking lot ~ re%utated by Section S-~S.4.
. ; otel,_Boqd. g .o se; · . .... ....
Automo'b~-.e. Sales loc; ~../~" '
repair; ~ '
merchandise other than plant ~~s ara kept ~ithin a completely
enclosed building; -J -
~) Tavern; '
~) Book S~ore; ~ .
.. ~) Massage Parlor; / ' . -
! on the s~e/g~ezises; . ._ ~
~ i~_z-mi:cent, contain may. tn*- ant-ssa- aa _oc=:e_ so ~s co ut_
~owa-ds lands in any adjacent R D<~t~t~_ _, =/</~ "~
(Amended hy sec. 12, Ord- 69-23; a_~en~ed by sec. 4~ Ord. 69-83; a~ended
by sec. 17, Ord. 70-57; mnended hy sec. 2, Ord. 7i-2~; a~e~_ded by sac.
Ord. 71-26; amended by sec. !, Ord. 73-27; a_~ended hy sec. 2~ Ord. 73-74;
amended by sec. 3, 0cd- 74-1; amende~ by sec. 2~ Crg. 74-78; amended by sec.
1, Ord- 75r20)
8-48.3' AC~SSORY USES: C-! Dv-EiT~--xiCTS- No use shall be permitted as ar.
9 'Accessory Use which involves the production of goods not izte"-del for
retail sale on the premises, or the cleaning or r~-pzir af atria!es of
clocking not directly received fram and delivered t~ the hustcmer an
the premises where suck c!ea~-ing or re,airing is done.
· '' ~-r ~ 09~_.~-~ .................. -~--.' ...... -'-'~
, R,,4ew pra~.dur.. '~"-'. ~ .;::~-~::;¢c':";"~,';'--'-' ......... ""
i..' ..... ' ~c yards are -~":-='; ;'~ a C-i District
; ~ 8-48.5 yARDS: Cz! DISiF. iCTS.
~ 'excep~ as .specified in Sections ~-48.6 a_nd 8-~.7~ ar in cc;_nectian
' with the approval of a Canditicnz! Use, or z variance.
· 9 8-48:6 F~Oh-f yJ_~LDS: C-! DiS,_-7~iC--5- ~q~erever a C-! Distric'- Ce_-----in-
aces at che baur. dary of an R District ar cf any other C District excep~
a C-2 District in the s~e B!cck, the depth af ?rant Yard in that Block
shall be'~a~ lass than is re%uirea {n such a'- .... ~'-~ District. Wherever
the Use of a Building Site is for a Mctel, Ea?-i or 5aarding House, the
depth of Front yar~ shall be n~t less than twen:]; (lO) feet.
§ 8-48.7 SIDE AMD REA~R y.~_RD£: C-1 DiSi?.iCTS. Cn :he street side cf a
Corner Lot in a C-1 Discric~ which abuts a Kay Lot in any i{ Dis~ric:
or in any ocher' c District, excep~ a C-2 District, the width cf the
Side yard shall he not lass than one-half (%) ~ha deo[k of the.FranC
yard required on such Kay Lot. Where the side Lc[ Line o-~ a Lo~ [.
in a C-1 DistricC abuts a lo~ in cay K District there shall be provided '
a'Side yard along chac line having a width ncc l~-~s thsn tha~ required
on suck abutting Lot. Where the rear Lo~ Line cf a lo~ in ~ C-1
Distric~ abuts a LoC in any K Dia~ric~, ~her~_ shall be provided a
Rear Yard having a depth not less than six (6) ~e~t. Wherever the Use
of a Building Site is for a }Iotel, Hotel or Boarding House, there
shall be Side Yards hOC less than Cam (10) feet in widtH, and a Rear
Yard not less than Cam (10) feet in~eptk.
8-48.8 HEIG~KT OF BUILDINGS: C-1 DISTRICTS. Except as otherwise pro-
vided in Section 8-60.9 and 8-60.10, no Building or Structure in a C-1
District shall have a Heigh~ in excess of foruy~five (45) feet, or in
excess of thir:y-five (35) feat if the Building or Sc~cture is situated
withim fifty (50) fee~ of the bounda~y line of an R-l, R-2 or R-3 or
R-S District.
~ r~:iec':.i .hq sic/n =nzli.
Ie¢L whichever L~ 1~==: and (~
(9/2) o( the frontwall
nd one-half (1~] ~cu~re feet for each Enezl-
· be Ilmite~ by bhls Sec:ion to le.~ u?kC.<] scu3:~ ~L' u:.:.-.-:-~' ::-
- T~pe and Lo~tion: Wall =ig~a~
· pe~it~ for ezch lot =u~Jo ~ cond?on~
.'.wi~in ~e middle on~i~ {~/21 of ~e =treet ?ontage.~n =aid free=tending =ign
~ within ~enty (20~et ot.~id street t~ant3ge; ~d
':-m~i~um ~{ te~0) ~e~ h~gh and have a
{. 'provided ~a~r e~ch o~e (q)~? Zh~t ~zld ~ree=unding
;. S~i~i~ign.~ pe~i~ed b7 Secdon
square leer. "' J ..." - :~- ;; '~'. ;{ "~ :' '~--' ~ '-."
~ing
~.ighc.
in
P~' gal faa. of !o~
~~ ~_a s~ha!! be.
(Based on sec- 2, Ord. 74-1; amended by sec.
~ ~igning
(Based on sec. 2, OrE- 7S-!)
'
~2: Building
~:g
d and i~ ~rea~ - ~ '" '
~~c~ Building
tha our 4) t~n ..... .
(Ba~ed on ~e=- 2, Or~. 74-1)
(Based on sec. i, Ord. 75~80)
8-48.
· OT:~R pgGULATIONS: C-1 DiS ,_-T~!CTS.
A_I1 Principal Uses in C-! Districts ani al! fabricatiuE, processing
or repair uses, accessory thereto' shall %e conducted ~tk~ g
~arking Lot, R~crazuicna! Vehicle and ~czt Storage~ Drive-in Tkaatra~
Drive-in BusinesS, Kanua!, Ser~ca S~z~icn~ ?!ant ~t~ria! storage
as authorized by Secti=n 8-4~.2(m)~ crz Cc~ty Facility cr
recreation facility.
b) Ail uses Ln C-! Distric:s shall cc~=~ to the oerfo~c~ stzn-
6erda of this Chapter ~cr M-~ Districts as sat forth ~ Sectizn
c) The ta~ "shop" as used in Section S-aS.! ~ha!! Be dam-ad to in-
clude only =ha establisi~ent of artisans dealing at ratzii ~ir~c't!y
~ith the cons~er~ an~ canceler pr~zri!/ vith cus:c: trada~ as
6istir. guished from quantity production. Except as a T~:pcrary Usa
regulated by Section S-60.60, usa cf ~ Ecbi!ahcma is r.=t pe~istad.
(J~an~gd by sec. 3, Ord. 6~-5~; ~ended ~y sac. i~ Or~. 69-~3; ~andad'
by sac. 2, Or~. 74-78)
NEW TRAFFIC
WIDENING OF
DUBLIN
'N
NEW TRAFF]C
IGNAL
AN RAMON ROAD
WIDENING
--.$A~ RAMON ROAD
OFF-RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
NEW STREET
Circulation Improvements
DUBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN
DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
18
Diagram 4
ALLOW G~EATER DEVELO
.INTENSITY IN AREAS LESS
AFFEC..TEp BY TRAFFI
CONGESTION CONSTR
.%
RETENTION OF ....
)'I~'EALER$.HI?.5"BU.T PLAN'
tENTUAL RELOCATION:'
ENCOURAGE INCREASED
DEVELOPMENT IN A-RE~ WITH
EXCESSIVE PARKING\ ~\ ~
CONTROl. DEVELO?ME
AND DEVELOPMENT
DISTRIBUTION TO LI&41T
CONGESTION AT KEY
· INTERSECTLON$
Land Use Objectives.
DUBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN
DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
__PLAN FOR FUTURE ACCOMODATION
OF A REGIONAL TRANSIT STATION
26
Diagram 8
Development Zones Map
DOBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN
DUBLIN, CALIFOR,'qlA
28
Diagram 9
Z
-<
~ z
ATTACHMENT
, . VISUAL APPEARANCE FRO
~AN RAMON ROAD IMPORTANT
..(
I]UILDING HEIG
.-'~ :STORI
NTRIES
3~i'ENT ED TO
kM),DOR pLAZA RD.
,;i;!S';.'~:i','-'L .'~ :
15'.. MIN.' LANDSCAPED
TBACK REQ'D..
PEDESTRIAN
REQ'D.
',.'~ i :".:,-
LIC AND ClALTY
RETAIL USES El
SUB~ANTIAL LA
REQUIRED
NEW ROADWAY- AND LANDSCAPED
PEDESTRIAN WAY REQUIRED
STRONG PEDESTRIAN TION
ENCOURAGED ~
IMPROVEMENTS TO INTERNAL CIRCULATION
AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING ENCOURAGED
PROJECT WITH PUBLIC FOCAL POINT,
CoMMERCIAL.USES AND REGIONAL TRANSIT PAI~KING
DESIRED
Special Site'Development
DUBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN
DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
Requirements
Diagram 12
ATTAJ BI ENT-7 =
../
~ Or~H
in o 22'
i-,o~
ITl
r-
ITl
· '? i;.: ' <
,' ';!:';:i --!
· :;3 ,
2'-9 1/2"
3 '-2 1/2"
ATM UNIT
I
SEAM
3 '-2 1/2"
DESK IlNIT
.1
0