HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 208-00 FireFacilityFeeRESOLUTION NO. 208 - 00
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING THE FIRE FACILITY FEE
FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DUBLIN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Dublin Municipal Code Chapter
7.78 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging a Public Facilities Fee ("Fee") to
pay for municipally owned public facilities within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment ("E Dublin GPA") and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan CSP") were adopted by the City in 1993; and
WHEREAS, the SP was amended in October 1996 by Resolution No. 124-96; and
WHEREAS, the E Dublin GPA outlines future land uses for approximately 4176 acres within the
City's eastern sphere of influence including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square
feet of commercial, office, and industrial development; and
WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies and action programs for
approximately 33 13 acres within the E Dublin GPA area nearest to the City; and
WHEREAS, the E Dublin GPA and SP areas CEastem Dublin") are shown. on the Land .Use Map
contained in the GPA and exclude the area shown' on the Land Use Map as "Future Study
Area/Agriculture"; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact. Report CE Dublin EIR") was prepared for the E
Dublin GPA and SP (SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993 by Resolution
No. 51-93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994 CAddenda") have been prepared
and considered by the Council; and
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan anticipates new development in several ateas, including
Eastern Dublin and Western Dublin, as well as infill development; and
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan has been amended by, among others, the Schaefer Ranch
General Plan Amendment (adopted by the City in July 1996 by Resolution No. 77-96); and Trumark
Homes General Plan Amendment (adopted by the City in May 1996 by Resolution No. 49-96); and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report ("Schaefer EIR") was prepared for the Schaefer
Ranch General Plan Amendment (SCH No. 95033070) and certified by the Council on July 9, 1996 by
Resolution No. 76-96; and
WHEREAS, on November 20, 1989 the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority approved a "Fire
Station Location Study" ("Station Location Study") prepared by Hughes-Heiss; and
WIqF, REAS, on November 2, 1999, in Resolution No. 206-99 the City Council approved a "Fire.
Station Prototype Study" C'Station Prototype Study") prepared by Dommer Associates; and
WHEREAS, the City's Building Code, as adopted in Dublin Municipal Code section 7.32.260
("Building Code") requires a five-minute fire response time; and
WHEREAS, a goal of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (8.3.1) is to ensure that fire protection
services in Eastern Dublin are consistent with standards maintained in the rest of the City, including a
five-minute response time; and
WHEREAS, the Station Location Study, Station Prototype Study, Building Code, SP, E Dublin
EIR and Addenda, and Schaefer EIR describe the municipal public facilities necessary to provide
adequate fire services in the City, including construction of two new fire stations; and
WI-IF, REAS, the General Plan, the Station Location Study, Station Prototype Study, Building
Code, SP, E Dublin GPA, E Dublin EIR and Addenda, and Schaefer ElR describe the impacts of
contemplated future development on existing public facilities in the City of Dublin through the year 2025
and contain an analysis of the need for new municipal public facilities required by future development
within the City of Dublin, including two new fire stations and related necessary equipment; and
WHEREAS, a detailed comprehensive study of the impacts of contemplated future development
on existing fire-related public facilities in the City of Dublin through the year 2025, along with an
analysis of the need for new fire-related public facilities and improvements requited by future
developments, was prepared by Hausrath Economics Group, dated March 1997 entitled '~)ublin Fire
Facilities Financing Study"; and
WHEREAS, MuniFinancial recently prepared a study, entitled '~ire Facilities Impact Fee for the
City of Dublin," which updated the Hausrath Study (Exhibit B hereto, hereafter "MuniFinancial Study");
and
WHEREAS the MuniFinancial Study was based on the General Plan (as amended to include not
only Eastern Dublin but all other general plan amendments to date, including the Schaefer Ranch and
Trumark Homes projects, hereafter the "General Plan"); and
WHEREAS, the MuniFinancial Study sets forth the relationship among contemplated future
development, the needed facilities, and the estimated costs of those improvements; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Govemment Code, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the
public hearing at which this resolution was adopted, notice of the time and place of the hearing was
mailed to eligible interested parties who filed written requests with the City for mailed notice of meetings
on new or increased fees or service charges; and
WHEREAS, the MuniFinancial Study was available fox public inspection and review for ten (10)
days prior to the public hearing held on the date hereof; and
WHEREAS, ten (10) days advance notice of the public hearing at which the resolution was
adopted was given by publication in accordance with section 6062a of the Government Code.
FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows:
A_ The purpose of the Fire Facilities Fee (hereafter "Fee")is to finance municipal public
facilities to reduce the impacts caused by future developments in the City of Dublin. Such facilities,
which are specifically described in the MuniFinancial Study, inchde the following: land acquisition and
construction of. two new fire stations, rolling stock and. equipment for two new stations, other associated
vehicles and equipment, administrative space, and improvements to existing facilities. The public
facilities described in the study are hereinafter referred to as the 'Tacilities."
B. The Fee collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the Facilities.
C. After considering the MuniFinancial Study, the testimony received at this noticed public
hearing, the Agenda statements, the General Plan, the SP, the Station Location Study, the Station
Prototype Study, the Building Code, the E Dublin. EIR and Addenda, the. Schaefer EIK and all
correspondence received (hereafter "Record"), the Council approves and adopts said MuniFinancial Study
and incorporates such herein; the Council further finds that the future development in the City of Dublin
will generate the need for the Facilities, and that the Facilities axe consistent with the City's General Plan,
the Station Location Study, and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
D. The adoption of the Fee as it relates to development within Eastern Dublin is within the
scope of the E Dublin EIR and Addenda. The Facilities were identified in the EIR as necessary to
accommodate development in Eastern Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the Facilities,
were adequately analyzed at a Program level in the E Dublin EIR. Since the certification of the E Dublin
EIR there have been no substantial changes in the projections of future development as identified in the E
Dublin EIK no substantial changes in the surrounding circumstances, and no other new information of
substantial importance so as to require important revisions in the E Dublin EIEs analysis of impacts,
mitigation measures, and alternatives. Subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA of
the Facilities will be required before any such Facilities are approved. It is not feasible to provide project
specific environmental review of the Facilities at this stage, as they will be implemented over a 30-year
period and specific details as to their timing, construction, and precise location are not presently known.
E. The adoption of the Fee as it relates to development within the area covered by the
SChaefer Project C'Schaefer Ranch Annexation Area") is within the scope of the Schaefer EIR. The
Facilities were all identified in the Schaefer EIK as necessary to accommodate development in Dublin.
The impacts of such development, including the Facilities, were adequately analyzed at a Project level in
the Schaefer EIR. Since the certification of the Schaefer EIR there have been no substantial changes in
the projections of future development as identified in the Schaefer EIK no substantial changes in the
surrounding circumstances, and no othe~ new information of substantial importance so as to require
important revisions in the Schaefer EIR's analysis of impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives.
Subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA of the Facilities will be required before
any such Facilities are approved. It is not feasible to provide p.roject specific environmental review of the
Facilities at this stage, as they will be implemented over a 30-year period and .specific details as to their
timing, construction and precise location axe not presently known.
F. The adoption of the Fee as it relates to development within the City of Dublin (excluding
Eastern Dublin and the Schaefer Annexation Area) is to obtain funds for capital projects necessary to
maintain service within the existing service areas; that the City currently provides fire protection and
suppression services through a contractual relationship with the Alameda County Fire Department, which
operates from three fire stations, two of which are located within the City limits (including the temporary
Santa Rita station); that the Fee will be used to maintain current service levels; and that no existing
deficiencies have been found to exist. As such, the Fee as it relates to development within the City
(excluding Eastern Dublin and the Schaefer Ranch Annexation Area) is not a "project" within the
meaning of CEQA (Public Resources Code § 21080(b)(8)(D)).
G. In- adopting the Fee, the Council is exercising its powers under Article XI, § 7 of the
California Constitution, Chapter 7.78 of the Dublin Municipal Code, and Chapter 5 of Division 1 of the
Government Code, commencing with section 66000 (and section 66018, in particular) collectively and
separately.
H. The Record establishes:
1. That there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Facilities and the
impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged in that new
development in the City of Dublin (hereafter to include Eastern Dublin and the Schaefer Ranch
Annexation Area)--both residential and non~residential--will generate persons who live, work,
and/or shop in Dublin and who generate or contribute to the need for the Facilities; and
2. That there is a reasonable relationship between the Fee's use (to pay for the
construction of the Facilities) and the type of development for which the Fee is charged in that all
development in the City of Dublin--both residential and non-residential--generates or contributes
to the need for the Facilities; and
3. That there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fee and. the cost
of the Facilities or portion thereof attributable to development in the City of Dublin in that the Fee
is calculated based on the number of residents or employees generated by specific types of land
uses, the total amount it will cost to construct the Facilities, and the percentage by which
development within the City of Dublin contributes to the need for the Facilities; and
4. That the cost estimates set forth in the MuniF inancial Study are reasonable cost
estimates for constructing the Facilities, and the Fees expected to be generated by future
development will not exceed the projected costs of constructing the Facilities; and
5. The method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development bears a fair and
reasonable relationship to each development's burden on, and benefit from, the Facilities to be
funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the number of residents or employees
each particular development will generate.
I. The Study is a detailed analysis of how public services will be affected by development in
the City of Dublin, and the public facilities required to accommodate that development.
ADOPTION OF FEE
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,
1. Definitions.
a. "Commercial" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on
land having a General Plan land use or zoning designation for facilities for the purchase and sale
of commodities and services and the sales, servicing, installation, and repair of such commodities
and. services and other space uses incidental to these activities. Commercial land uses include but
are not limited to: apparel and clothing stores; auto dealers and malls; auto accessories stores;
banks and savings and loans; beauty salons; book stores; discount stores and centers; dry cleaners;
drug stores; eating and drinking establishments; furniture stores and outlets; general merchandise
stores; hardware stores; home furnishings and improvernent centers; hotel/motels; laundromats;
liquor stores; restaurants; service stations; shopping centers; supermarkets; and theaters.
'~)eveloped" and "development" shall mean the construction or alteration of or
addition to, other than by the City, any building or structure within the City of Dublin.
c. "Facilities" shall include those municipal public facilities as are described in the
MuniFinancial Study and as described in the Fire Station Location Report, Station Prototype
Report, SP, E Dublin EIR and Addenda. "Facilities" shall also include comparable alternative
facilities should later changes in projections of development in the region necessitate construction
of such altemative facilities; provided that the City Council later determines (1) that there is a
reasonable relationship between development within the City of Dublin and the need for the
alternative facilities (2) that the alternative facilities are comparable to the facilities in the Study,
and (3) that the revenue from the Fee will be used only to pay new development's fair and
proportionate share of the alternative facilities.
d. "Industrial" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on land
having a General Plan land use or zoning designation for the manufacture, production, assembly,
and processing of consumer goods and other space uses incidental to these activities. Industrial
land uses include but are not limited to: assembly; concrete and asphalt batching plants;
contractor's storage yards; fabrication; lumber yard; manufacturing; oredoor stockyards and
service yards; printing; processing; warehouse and distribution; and wholesale and heavy
commercial uses.
e. 'WIixed Development" shall mean a development that includes more than one of
the types of development defined in this Section 1. Mixed developments may combine residential
types of development (Single Family and Multiple Family), non-residential types of development
(Commercial, Industrial, and Office), or a combination of residential and non-residential types of
development.
f. "Multiple Family" shall mean any dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building
Code, as adopted by the City, which is constructed on property designated in the General Plan or
SP for 6.1 or more units per acre.
g. "Office" shall mean any development constructed or to be constructed on land
having a General Plan land use or zoning designation for general business offices, medical and
professional offices, administrative or headquarters offices for large wholesaling or manufacturing
operations, and research and development and other space uses incidental to these activities.
Office land uses include but are not limited to: administrative headquarters; business park; finance
offices; insurance offices; legal offices; medical and health services offices; offices and office
buildings; professional and administrative offices; professional associations; real estate offices;
research and development and travel agencies.
h. "Single Family" shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building
Code (UBC), as adopted by the City of Dublin, which is constructed or to be constructed on
property designated in the General Plan or SP for 6 or fewer units per acre.
2. Fire Facilities Fee Imposed.
a. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66000 et seq., C'Mitigation Fee Act") a Fire
Facilities Fee shall be imposed and paid at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and
be administered as prescribed in this Resolution on each Single Family and Multiple Family
residential unit developed within the City of Dublin, including each portion of such residential
development within mixed development.
b. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66000 et seq., ("Mitigation Fee Act") a Fire
Facilities Fee shall be imposed and paid at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and
be administered as prescribed in this Resolution on each non-residential building or structure,
including commercial, industrial, and office buildings and structures, developed within the City of
Dublin, including each portion of such non-residential development within mixed development.
c. Any use of land which is not included in the definition of "Commercial,"
Industrial," or "Office" shall be allocated by the Community Development Director to one of the
three categories, maintaining as much consistency as possible with the definitions of such terms.
3. Time for Imposing Fee for Residential Subdivisions.
In accordance with Government Code Section 65961, the Fee for Single Family and Multiple
Family subdivision development for which tentative or parcel maps are required pursuant to the
Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Sections 66410 et seq.) shall be imposed at the time of approval
of the conditions that apply to the tentative or .parcel map for such residential subdivision development, as
applicable. Payment of the Fee shall be deemed to be a condition of all such tentative or parcel maps,
Notwithstanding this Section 3, the time for payment of the Fee for all development, including Single
Family and Multiple Family subdivisions, shall be as specified in Section 4, below.
4. Time for Fee Payment.
a. In accordance with Government Code Section 66007, a Fee shall be charged and
paid for each Single Family and Multiple Family residential development upon the date of final
inspection or issuance of the certificate of occupancy for such residential development, which ever
is earlier; however, if the Fee is to reimburse the City for expenditures previously made, or if the
City determines that the Fee will be collected for Facilities for which an account has been
established and funds appropriated and for which the City has adopted a proposed construction
schedule prior to issuance of the building permit for such residential development, then the Fee
shall be charged and paid upon issuance of the building permit for such residential development.
b. A Fee shall be charged and paid for each non-residential development, including
commercial, industrial, and office developments, upon issuance of the building permit for such
non-residential development.
c. A Fee shall be charged and paid for each mixed development upon the times
specified in this Section 4 that apply to such mixed development. For example, if a mixed
development includes residential development and non-residential development; and the Fee is to
reimburse the City for expenditures previously made, or the City has made the required
determination to permit requiring payment of the Fee upon issuance of the building permit, the
Fee as applicable to the entire mixed development shall be paid upon issuance of the building
permit for the mixed development. If a mixed development includes residential and non-
residential development, and the Fee is not to reimburse the City for expenditures previously made
or the City has not made the required determination to permit requiring payment of the Fee upon
issuance of the building permit, the Fee as to the residential portion of the mixed development
shall be paid upon the earlier of the date of final inspection or issuance of the certificate of
occupancy for such residential portion, and the Fee as to the non-residential portion of the mixed
development shall be paid upon issuance of the building permit for such non-residential portion.
5. Amount of Fee.
a. The amount of the Fee for residential and non-residential development shall be as
set forth on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein.
applicable:
The amount of the Fee for mixed development shall be the sum of the following, as
i. The applicable amount per-unit pursuant to Section 5(a), above, for each
Single Family and Multiple Family development within a mixed development.
ii. The applicable amount per 1,000 sq. ft. pursuant to Section 5(a), above, for
each commercial, office, or industrial development or portion of such development within
a Mixed Development.
6. Exemptions From Fee.
a. The Fee shall not be imposed on any of the following:
(1) Any alteration or addition to a residential structure, except to the extent that
a residential unit is added to a single family residential unit or another unit is added to an
existing multiple-family residential unit;
(2) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing residential structure that
has been destroyed or demolished, if the building permit for reconstruction is obtained
within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished. This sub section shall not
apply if the replacement or reconstruction increases the square footage of the structure by
50 percent or more.
(3) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure
that has been destroyed or demolished, if the building permit for reconstruction is obtained
within one year after the building was destroyed or demolished, there is no change in the
land use designation of the property, and the square footage of the replacement building
does not exceed the square footage of the building that was destroyed or demolished.
(4) Any non-residential building or structure constructed on property on which
a building or structure was demolished for which a development impact fee to fund fire
facilities has been paid to the City within the prior ten year period. The exemption
provided in this subsection shall be in the amount of the previously-paid fee only, and the
applicant shall pay any additional amount based on the then-current Fee.
(5)
Any addition to an existing non-residential structure of 500 square feet or
less.
b. The City Council, in its discretion, may waive the applicability of the Fee to certain
development constructed or to be constructed by a public entity on land having an appropriate
General Plan land use designation upon findings of the City Council that such a waiver is in the
interest of the public health, safety, and/or welfare, for reasons specified in the findings. Such
reasons may include, but are not limited to, that the Fee, as it would apply to such development by
a public entity, will be sufficiently recovered in whole or in part from residential development the
residents of which may constitute the primary users of the public entity development.
7. Use of Fee Revenues.
a. The Eevenues raised by payment of the Fee shall he placed in the Capital Project
Fund. Separate and special accounts within the Capital Project Fund shall be used to account for
such revenues, along with any interest earnings on each account. The revenues (and interest) shall
be used for the following purposes:
(1) To pay for design~ engineering, right,of-way or land acq,,isition_ and
construction and/or .acquisition of the Facilities and .reasonable costs of outside consultant
studies related thereto;
(2). To reimburse the City for the Facilities con stnmted by the City witk~mds
from other sources including fimds from other public entities,. unless the City fim~s were
obtained from grants or gifts intended by the grantor to be used for the Facilities.
(3) To ~:eimbutse dexzelopexs who have_ designed and c~onstsmtec[ Facilities
which are oversized with supplemental size, length, or capacity; and
(4) To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing
administration of the Fee program.
h. Fees inthese~ accounts. shallbe expenc[ed only for the Facilities and only for the
purpose for which the Fee was collected.
8. Standards.
The standards upon which the needs for the Facilities are based are the standards of the City of
Dublin, including the standards contained in the General Plan, the Station Location Study, Station
Prototype Study, the SP, E Dublin EI]R and Addenda and the Schaefer EIR.
9. Existing Deficiencies.
There are no existing deficiencies.
10. Periodic Review.
Council,
account.
During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall prepare a report for the City
pursuant to Government Code section 66006, identifying the balance of Fees in each
11. Subsequent Analysis of the Fee.
The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the Council in reliance on the Record
identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the
b. Pursuant to Government Code section 66002, the City Council shall also review, as
part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the approximate location, size, time
of availability and estimates of cost for all Facilities to be financed with the Fee. The estimated
costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council shall
make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and
demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council shall review the Fee to
determine that .the amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of development within the City of Dublin
and within al:eas included~in the City!s Gemeral. Plan_ The City Council. may ~evise the Fee to incorporate
the findings. and conclusions of further studies and any standards in the SP and General Plan, as well as
increases due to inflation and increased construction costs.
12. Fee Adjustments.
The purpose of this Section 12 is to provide for annual adjustments of the Fee for inflation,
beginning July 1,2001 and each July thereafter.
The Fee shall. be adjusted base& on_the change. in_ construction_ co sts,_ land aeqni siti on costs~ and
equipment costs using the percentage increase/decrease in the three indicators describe in sub sections (a),
(b), and (c) below. Those adjustments shall be applied to the Fee rate based on the relative allocation
among the cost estimate for construction of improvements, acquisition of land, and purchase of equipment
include& irk tim MuniFinancial. Study~ Based_ on the informalion. containeel in. TabLe.. 2 o£ the
MuniFinancial Study, 81% of the cost estimate is attributable to construction, 8% to land acquisition, and
11% to acquisition of apparatus. Accordingly, the construction cost indicator shall be weighted 81%, the
land cost indicator 8%, and the facilities acquisition indicator 11%.
a~ Construction_ Cost. Annually eaclxluLy> the City Manager shall adjnst the cost of
construction of the Facilities, as shown in Table 2 in the MuniFinancial Study,
increasing/decreasing such construction cost by the annual percentage increase/decrease reached
by comparing the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (20-city average) for the
pdo~ Mamk o~ Ap~[ over the same Construction Cost Index.fox the. same.month fo~ the prior. year.
The City Manager may round the adjusted Facilities construction cost to whole dollars.
b. Land Acquisition Cost. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust the cost
of acquiring real property interests for the Facilities, as shown on Table 2 in the MuniFinancial
Smdy,_by calculating the percentage. elmage in land cost per acre within the. City,. hased on a
comparison of the most recent appraisal (prepared for the City for the purpose of adjusting the
Fee) and the immediately preceding appraisal (prepared for the City for the purpose of adjusting
the Fee and using. the same methodology). The City Manager may round the adjusted Facilities
land acquisition cost to whole dollars.
c. Facilities Acquisition Cost. Annually each July, the City Manager shall adjust the
cost of acquiring (through purchase or otherwise) the vehicles, equipment, and furnishings, as
shown on_ Table2 in_the MuniFi nanci al Study,_by applyingthe. then current Consumer Price Index
for all .urban consumers for the San Francisco/Oakland bay area for the months of March or April.
The City Manager may round the adjusted Facilities acquisition cost to whole dollars.
qZotalAnnnal Eee. Adjustment_ AnmmlLy eackluty~the City Managex .~hall_adjust
the Fee by applying the total annual Fee adjustment for that year to the prior year's Fee. The total
annual Fee adjustment shall be reached by apportioning the adjustment in construction cost, land
acqt~sifion cost and facilities acquisition cost calculated according to this Section 12 according to
the percentage each cost comprises of the whole Fee.
13. Administrative Guidelines.
The Council. may, by msolutio~ adopt administrative. guidelines to provide pxocedums for
calculation, .credit, reimbursement, or deferred payment and other administrative .aspectsof itie Fee. _Such
guidelines may include procedures for construction of designated Facilities by developers.
14. Effective Date.
This resolution shall become effective immediately. The Fee provided in Section 2 of this
resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the resolution.
15. S everability.
Each component of the Fee and all portions of this resolution are severable. Should any individual
component of the Fee or other provision of this resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable,
the ~:emaining component o~ p~:ovisions. shall_ he and_ continue to be fully effeet~e~ and_ the Fee shall be
fully effective except as to that component that has been judged to be invalid.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
Counciimembers Lockhart, McCormick, Oravetz, Zika and Mayor Houston
NOES: None
AB SENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
K2~'Gtl~-5-00/reso-~refee.doc
J:\WPDXMNRS WX 114\001X2000XResoNfirefees_l 101 .doc
Corporate Office
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590
Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864)
Fax: (909) 699-3460
FIRE FACILITIES
IMPACT FEE
FOR THE
CITY OF DUBLIN
OCTOBER 18, 2000
:M........,........ .a!f". ." . .. I
::. .. 'U' .-.. .].n....gn... n. 'Ia"
<':. :;" ,:~ ..I}I'- " ,"'" : :- 'GI :0, - - :
A W1LLDAN OOMPANY
IS e6 3b
Regional Office
1736 Franklin Street, Suite 450
Oakland, California 94612
Tel: (510) 832-0899
www.muni.com Fax: (510) 832-0898
EXHIBIT B
fLAD ';08'- 00
/J- - 5' - () V
fl.!;
/6 ~ 3b
OTYOP DUBLIN
FIRE FAaLlTiESIMPAcr FEE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
E .. F' F ili'" 1
XlStIng Ire ac ties................................................................................................................................
Fire Facilities Service Population ......................................................................... ...................... .............. 4
Fire F acilities Standards ............................................................................................................................. 5
Fire Facilities To Accommodate New Development ...........................................................................7
Alternative Funding Sources............................................................................................ ......................... 8
Fee Schedule and cash Flow Model........................................................................................................ 8
Program Implementation ........... ........ ..................................................................................................... 19
MUNIFINANaAL
FINAL REPORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGEi
J 1 136
CiTYOF DUBLIN
FIRE FAaLlTlES lMPAcr FEE
FIRE FACILITIES IMPACT FEE
This report summarizes an analysis of funding for new fire facilities by the
City of Dublin (the "City") to accommodate new development. The report
documents a reasonable relationship between new development and an
impact fee for funding these new facilities.
The City of Dublin contracts with the Alameda County Fire Department for
fire services. The City is responsible for providing all necessary capital
facilities. The Citycurrently imposes an impact fee of $512 per single family
dwelling unit, $312 per multi-family dwelling unit, $.148 per square foot for
office, $.076 per square foot for commercial and '$.065 per square foot for
industrial. This report updates the fee based on current facility standards,
costs, and projections of new development. The report documents funding
of new facilities with a combination of general fund loans and debt financing.
The inventory of existing and planned fire facilities provides a basis for
calculating the City's facility standard. This standard is used to determine new
development's fair share obligation to expand facilities as growth occurs. The
facilities described here serve the City of Dublin.
The Alameda County Fire Department currently serves the City of Dublin
population from two fire stations (Stations 15 and 16). The City leases Station
15 from Alameda County as part of a joint-use county facility. The City owns
station 16 and associated equipment. Both stations are staffed entirely by
Alameda County Fire Department personnel. Detailed data on the
Department's vehicles are shown in Table 1. Vehicles cost estimates include
the fire fighting and emergency medical equipment needed to stock each
vehicle. Table 2 summarizes the Department's inventory of land, building
square feet, vehicles, and equipment as it currently exists and partially funded
as well as new facilities to be constructed or purchased. $1.5 million of
vehicles and equipment and approximately $800,000 of land and building
design expenditures will have been incurred as of July 1,2001, the beginning
of fiscal year 2001/02.
MUNIFlNANaAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 1
/ '5 u6 3~
Table 1: Existing and Future Fire Equipment Inventory and Valuation
Vehicle Tvee and Make Vehicle Eauiement Total
Fire Station 16 (Existing)
1998 Pierce Quantum - Type I Engine $ 350,000 $ 110,000 $ 460,000
1984 Van Pelt - Type I Engine 350,000 110,000 460,000
1986 Ford 4X4 - Patrol 120,000 45,000 166,000
Total Fire Station 16 $ 820,000 $ 265,000 $ 1,085,000
Fire Station 17 (Existinq) 1
1999 L TI - Ladder Truck $ 550,000 $ 125,000 $ 675,000
1991 Pierce - Type I Engine 350,000 110,000 460,000
1995 Fire Bann - Type III Engine 300,000 80,000 380,000
Total Fire Station 17 $ 1,200,000 $ 315,000 $ 1,515,000
Fire Station 18 (New)
2000 Pierce Quantum - Type I Engine $ 350,000 $ 110,000 $ 460,000
2000 Dodge 4X4 - Patrol 120,000 45,000 166,000
Total Fire Station 18 $ 470,000 $ 155,000 $ 625,000
Total All Vehicles & Equipment $ 2.490,000 $ 735.000 $ 3.225.000
Note: Valuation based on current replacement value.
1 Truck from Station #16, purchased with funds derived from the existing population, will be transferred
to future Station #17.
Sources: Alameda Countv Fire Deoartment staff - vehicle and eauioment estimates: MuniFinancial.
CiTYOF DUBUN
Table 2: Existing and Future Fire Facilities
Existing
Fire Station 16 (Existing):
Land1
BUildinQ2
BuildinQContents & Eouiornene
Vehicles & Equipment
Subtotal Existing Facilities
Amount
1.00
8,815
$ 60,000
$ 1,085,000
acres
so. ft.
Fire Station 17 (Funded as 0'6130/2001):
Land & BuildinQ Develooment4 $ 800.000
Vehicles & Equipment $ 1,515,000
Subtotal
Total Existing
New
Fire Station 17 (New):
Land & BuildinQ Developmene
BuildinQ Contents & Equipmene
Subtotal
Total Station 17
Fire Station 18 (New):
LandS
BuildinQ2
BuildinQ Contents & Eouipment3
Vehicles & EqUipment
Subtotal
Subtotal New Facilities
Total Fire System Facilities
$ 2.391.037
$ 97.465
$
$
0.75 acres
8.181 so. ft,
50.000
625,000
Unit Cost
$ 871,200
$ 257
NA
NA
$ 653.400
$ 282
NA
NA
/9 ~ 2>~
FIRE FAaLlTIES IMPAcr FEE
Cost
Total Cost
$ 871,000
2,265.000
60.000
1.065,000
$ 4,281,000
$ 800.000
NA 1,515.000
$ 2.315.000
, $ 6,596,000
2,391.037
NA 97 .465
$ 2,488,502
$ 4,803,502
$ 490,050
rf309.00O::~:J,
~~--""."~..
50.000
67'5,000
$ 3,474,050
$ 5,962,552
$ 12,558,552
NA=Not applicable.
1 Land value for Station #16 of $20 per square foot was approximated by City of Dublin staff .
2 Building replacement cost based on the cost per square foot for a new double engine company for Station 16, a
new c\.ouble engine company "litl'> rnerjical transport for Station 17, and a new sU:lgIe engine company for Station
18, all concrete block construction, as provided in the Alameda County Fire Station Prototype Study. Building
replacement cost for Station 17 was provided by City of Dublin staff, which approximates the cost per Alameda
County Fire Station Prototype Study,
3 Represents additional equipment not included in building cost (radio, office equipment, telephone, etc). Value
based on current replacement value as estimated by District staff.
4 Per telephone conversation with Chris Foss, Economic Development Director, the City will have spent approx.
$800,000 on land acquisition and building design by 6/30/2001, existing development's portion. The remaining
portion is to be funded by new development.
5 Land value for Station #18 of ,$15 per square foot was approximated by considering two land appraisals (from
ARfWS report provided by City staff) of adjacent comparable properties with valuations of $7.50 per sqft and $16
per soft. Smaller lots (such as Station #17) tend toward hioher purchase prices.
Sources: Table 1; Alameda County Fire Department; Alameda County Fire Station Prototype Study. Don
Dommer Associates, Februarv 25, 2000: ARIWS valuation reoort - Dublin Ranch: MuniFinancial
MUNIFINANaAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE)
). Di 3~
QTY OF DUBLIN
FIRE FAaLlTIES IMPAcr FEE
The Gtyplans to use monies fromthe new development impact fee to
purchase land and construct two new stations, purchase new apparatus and
equipment, new engines and a patrol vehicle. All proceeds from future impact
fee collections will be spent with the purpose of preventing a decline in
current service standards as well as improvements necessary to address
requirements brought on by new development.
The City serves both homes and businesses in its service area. Need for the
City's services and associated facilities' is measured by its service population,
or the number of residents and workers within its service area. Service ,
population reasonably represents the need for fire facilities because people
requesting medical assistance generate most calls for service, rather than
structure fires requiring suppression. Hence, the demand for fire service is
strongly correlated with the distribution of residents and workers within the
servIce area.
Table 3 shows the estimated service population for 2002 and 2025. In
calculating the service population, residents are given a weight of 1.0 and
workers are weighted at 0.24 to reflect lower per capita service usage. The .24
weighting for workers is based on the amount of time workers spend in the
City compared to residents. Nonresidential buildings are typically occupied
less intensively than dwelling units, so it is reasonable to assume that average
per-worker usage of services is less than average per-resident usage.
MUNIFINANaAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 4
CiTYOF DUBLIN
:< I 0I:3~
FIRE FAaLlTIES IMPAcr FEE
Table 3: Fire Facilities Service Population
Residents
Workers
Service
, PODulation 1
ExistinQ (2002)2
New Development (2002-2025)
Total (2025)3
34,100
24,300
58,400
28,700
12,200
40,900
41,000
27,200
68,200
Service Pop. Weighting Factor
1.00
0.24
Note: Workers are weighted at 24% of residents to reflect the amount of time workers spend in
the City compared to residents.
1 Service population equals residents plus workers with each weighted by factor shown at bottom
of table.
2 Resident and Worker populations as of July 1, 2001 (FYE 2002) as estirn~ted frorn ABAG,
Projections 2000 .
3 Resident and Worker populations as of 2025,obtained from the Public Facilities Fee Study,
1998 Update prepared by Hausrath Economics Group, used per direction of City of Dublin staff.
Sources: Association of Bay Area Governments, Projections 2000, Subregional Study Area;
Public Facilities Fee Study, 1998 Update prepared by Hausrath Econornics Group; ,
MuniFinancial.
The impact fee is based on a system standard. The system standard
incorporates all existing development and public facilities designed to serve
that development. The standard represents the average per capita cost of all
facilities to serve the entire service population. Using this per capita standard
as a basis for the impact fee ensures an equitable distribution of total system
costs between existing and new development. The City's public facilities
system standard is shown in Tables 4. This standard assumes cash at!1d
general fund financing of Station 17 and debt financing of Station 18. The
per capita cost standard is shown separately for residents and workers because
their respective demand for services is weighted differently (see discussion
above) .
Response time
Planning for new fire facilities typically uses a response time standard, or the
time from service call to arrival of the first- response team. The Alameda
County Fire Department has a five- minute average response time standard.
The Departmeht currently considers that it meets that standard on a citywide
basis with average response times of five minutes or less.
MUNIFlNANaAL
FINAL REPORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 5
CiTYoFDUBUN
MUNIFINANCIAL
;.~ 4' 3b
FIRE FAaLlTIESIMPAcr FEE
ISO rating
Another standard used for planning fire facilities is in the form of a rating
provided by the Insurance Services Organization (ISO). The insurance
industry uses ISO ratings to assist in determining insurance premiums for
building owners. The ISO rating is based on travel distance (not travel time)
to the nearest fire station, and other factors such water availability and
commumcatlOns systems.
Currently, the Alameda County Fire Department, the agency that operates the
fire stations serving the City of Dublin, has an ISO rating of Qass 2. The
Department's plans for new facilities are intended to maintain that rating as
growth occurs. Any deterioration in the ISO rating would have an adverse
affect on property insurance rates in the City.
Per capita standards and unit costs
To ensure equity between the ,level of existing facilities and the facilities that
new development should be responsible for, we have developed per capita
facility standards under both the pay-as-you-go and debt financing models.
These standards are based on existing fire department facilities, and are
shown in Tables 4. Use of these standards in calculating the impact fee
ensures that new development pays for the same level of facilities as existing
development has funded in the past.
Table 4: Future Fire Facilities Standard
Existing Public Facilities
Planned Public Facilities
Total Public Facilities
Cost of Debt Financing
Total Cost
2025 Service Population
$ 6,596,000
5.962.552
$ 12,558,552
1.215.950
$ 13,774,502
68,700
Facility Standard per Capita
$
202
Cost per Resident
Cost per Worker
$
$
202
48
Sources: Tables 2 and 3; MuniFinancial.
FINAL REpORT _ OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 6
CiTYOF DUBLIN
;Z 2J i :3~
FIRE FAaLlTlES IMPAcr FEE
Tables 5 shows the specific configuration of current and future fire facilities.
The allocation of costs for planned facilities to new development within the
City is shown in Tables 6. The total cost of facilities associated with growth
is based on the facility standards shown in Tables 4, and represents the
maximum amount that could be funded with an impact fee.
The importance of Tables 6 is the bottom line ($1,684,502) that shows the
share of planned facility costs that must come from revenue sources other
than impact fees imposed within the City. The City can raise the funding
needed to complement impact fee revenues over the planning horizon of this
study (through 2025). This funding is necessary to justify the fee imposed on
new development within the City using the system standard documented here.
If this funding does not materialize, then new development would have paid
too high a fee.
Table 5: Existing and Planned Facilities
Station
Current Use Future Use
15
Single engine company Replaced by Station 17
16
Double engine compan/ Transfer one truck to
Station 17 and function as
a sinQle enQine company
17
To be built Double engine company
with medical transport
18
To be built Single engine company
1 Station 15 will be replaced by Station 17.
2 Station 16 will transfer a truck and equiprnent to Station 17 and function as
a siegle engine company. The construction of the station remains as a
do.uble engine company.
Sources: Alameda Countv Fire Deoartment staff.
MUNIFINANCIAL
FINAL REPORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 7
CiTYOF DUBliN
;z, L/ i 3b
FIRE FAaLlTIESIMPAcr FEE
Table 6: Fair Share of Future Fire Facilities CQsts
Facility Standard per Capita $
Service Population Growth Within Town (2002-2025)
202
27,200
Net Contribution from Other Revenue Sources
$ 5,494,000
(5,962,552)
(1.215.950)
$ 1,684,502
Impact Fee Revenue To Serve Growth
Cost of Planned Facilities
Cost of Debt Financing
Sources: Tables 2, 3 and 4; MuniFinancial.
The City anticipates availability of a limited amount of general fund monies
to fund existing development's fair share of new facilities. The City could also
develop new sources of tax revenue besides impact fees, such as a parcel tax,
though all new taxes would require approval by voters.
Fee schedules
Table 7 shows the fire facilities impact fee for new development based on the
facilities cost per capita as shown in Tables 4. The fee represents the
maximum justified fee to fully fund all fire facilities needed to accommodate
growth based on existing facility standards. Both residential and
nonresidential development would pay the fee based on the service
population for fire facilities.
MUNlFlNANaAL
FINAL REPORT - OCTOBER 18,2000
PAGES
CiTY OF DUBliN
MUNIFrNANCIAL
~ 5 ~13b
FIRE FACILlTIES1MPAcr FEE
Table 7: Fire Facilities Impact Fee
Costs per
land Use CaDita Densitv 1 Fee2
Residential
Single Family $ 202 3.20 $ 646
Multifamily 202 2.00 404
Nonresidential
Office $ 48 260 $ 185
Commercial 48 505 95
Industrial 48 590 81
1 Persons per dwelling unit for residential land uses and square feet per ernployee
for nonresidential land uses.
2 Per dwelling unit for residential uses and per 1,000 square feet for nonresidential
land uses.
Sources: Public Facilities Fee Study, 1998 Update prepared by Hausrath
Economics Grauo: Table 4: MuniFinancial.
Projected fire facility fee revenue and cash flow analysis
We have prepared models of the fire impact fee fund in order to analyze the
sufficiency and timing of impact fee revenue in relation to capital
expenditures. Tables 8 projects the annual fire facility fee revenue through
build-out (2025). Table 9 presents the cash flowanalysis through build-out.
The cash flow analysis assumes capital expenditures for Station 17 in fiscal
year 2002 and Station 18 in fiscal year 2006. The model assumes impact fee
and general fund financing of Station 17 construction costs. The model also
assumes debt financing of Station 18 in the amount of the station's projected
construction cost in current dollars plus the costs of issuance as well as
interim general fund financing of debt service. Debt financing is assumed to
have an interest cost of 5% and maturity in 2015 (10 year term).
The cash flow analysis assumes the general fund will be used, by way of inter-
fund loans, when impact fee revenue becomes inadequate to cover debt
service and capital projects. The inter-fund loans are over and above existing
development's fair share contribution. Impact fee revenues will reimburse the
general fund for all inter-fund loans as detailed in the cash flow analysis on
Table 9. The model assumes the interest cost on interim inter- fund loan
balances from the general fund is offset by interest earnings on positive
impact fee fund balances.
FINAL REpORT- OCTOBER 18,'2000
PAGE 9
CiTYOF DUBliN
;J, Go 'i:3 b
FIRE FAaLlTIEslMPAcr FEE
Table 8: Projected Annual Fire Facility Fee Revenue
Land Use 20022 2003 2004 2005
Residential 1
Single Family
Dwelling Units 194 194 194 194
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646
Fee Revenue $ 125,188 $ 125,188 $ 125,188 $ 125,188
Multifamily
Dwelling Units 465 465 465 465
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404
Fee Revenue $ 187,990 $ 187,990 $ 187,990 $ 187,990
Total Residential Fee Revenue $ 313,178 $ 313,178 $ 313,178 $ 313,178
Nonresidential 1
Office
1,000 Square Feet 85 85 85 85
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 L I
Fee Proceeds $ 15,641 $ 15,641 $ 15,641 $ 15,641
Commercial
1,000 Square Feet 99 99 99 99
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95
Fee Proceeds $ 9,399 $ 9,399 $ 9,399 $ 9.399
Industrial
1,000 Square Feet 20 20 20 20
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81
Fee Proceeds $ 1,636 $ 1,636 $ 1,636 $ 1,636
Total Nonresidential Fee Revenues $ 26,677 $ 26,677 $ 26,677 $ 26,677
Total Fee Revenues $ 339,855 $ 339.855 $ 339,855 $ 339.855
Note: Fee revenue not adjusted for inflation.
1 Growth between 2002 and 2025 in annual increments in residential DUE's and non-residential square
footage is estimated on growth factors in five year periods as derived frorn ABAG Projections 2000 data.
2 Fiscal Year endinQ June 30. 2002.
Sources: Public Facilities Fee Study, 1998 Update prepared by Hausrath Economics Group;
MuniFinancial.
MUNIFINANClAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 10
OTYoFDUBLlN
cR I} i3b
FIRE FAClLlTIESlMPAcr FEE
Table 8: Projected Annual Fire Facility Fee Revenue (Continued)
Land Use 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Residential 1
Single Farnily
Dwelling Units 108 108 108 108 108
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646
Fee Revenue $ 69,748 $ 69,748 $ 69,748 $ 69,748 $ 69,748
Multifarnily
Dwelling Units 259 259 259 259 259
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404
Fee Revenue $ 104,737 $ 104,737 $ 104,737 $ 104,737 $ 104,737
Total Residential Fee Revenue $ 174.485 $ 174,485 $ 174,485 $ 174,485 $ 174.485
Nonresidential 1
Office
1 ,000 Square Feet 93 93 93 93 93
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185
Fee Proceeds $ 17,242 $ 17,242 $ 17 ,242 $ 17,242 $ 17,242
Comrnercial
1,000 Square Feet 109 109 109 109 109
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95
Fee Proceeds $ 10,361 $ 10,361 $ 10,361 $ 10,361 $ 10,361
Industrial
1,000 Square Feet 22 22 22 22 22
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81
Fee Proceeds $ 1,804 $ 1,804 $ 1,804 $ 1,804 $ 1,804
Total Nonresidential Fee Revenues $ 29,407 $ 29,407 $ 29,407 $ 29,407 $ 29,407
Total Fee Revenues $ 203,892 $ 203,892 $ 203,892 $ 203,892 $ 203,892
Note: Fee revenue not adjusted for inflation.
1 Growth between 2002 and 2025 in annual increments in residential DUE's and non-residential square footage is
estimated on growth factors in five year periods as derived from ABAG Projections 2000 data.
Sources: Public Facilities Fee Studv, 1998 UDdate oreoared bv Hausrath Economics Grouo: MuniFinancial.
MUNIFINANaAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18,2000
, PAGE 11
CiTYoF DUBLIN
rJ.. 9: " ::!; .f,
FIRE FAaLlTIES IMPAcr FEE
Table 8: Projected Annual Fire Facility Fee Revenue (Continued)
Land Use 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Residential 1
Single Farnily
Dwelling Units 100 100 100 100 100
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646
Fee Revenue $ 64,382 $ 64,382 $ 64,382 $ 64,382 $ 64,382
Multifarnily
Dwelling Units 239 239 239 239 239
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404
Fee Revenue $ 96,680 $ 96,680 $ 96,680 $ 96,680 $ 96,680
Total Residential Fee Revenue $ 161,063 $ 161,063 $ 161,063 $ 161,063 $ 161 ,063
Nonresidential 1
Office
1,000 Square Feet 46 46 46 46 46
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185
Fee Proceeds $ 8,523 $ 8,523 $ 8,523 $ 8,523 $ 8,523
Comrnercial
1,000 Square Feet 54 54 54 54 54
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95
Fee Proceeds $ 5,121 $ 5,121 $ 5,121 $ 5,121 $ 5,121
Industrial
1,000 Square Feet 11 11 11 11 11
Fee per 1 ,000Square Feet $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81
Fee Proceeds $ 892 $ 892 $ 892 $ 892 $ 892
Total Nonresidential Fee Revenues $ 14,536 $ 14,536 $ 14,536 $ 14,536 $ 14,536
Total Fee Revenues $ 175,599 $ 175,599 $ 175,599 $ 175,599 $ , 175,599
Note: Fee revenue not adjusted for inflation.
1 Growth between 2002 and 2025 in annual increments in residential DUE's and non-residential square footage is
estimated on growth factors in five year periods as derived from ABAG Projections 2000 data.
Sources: Public Facilities Fee Studv, 1998 Uodate oreoared bv Hausrath Economics Grouo: MuniFinancial.
MUNIFlNANaAL
FINAL REPORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 12
CiTYOF DUBliN
cl-9 ci Sb
FIRE FAaLlTIES IMPAcr FEE
Table 8: Projected Annual Fire Facility Fee ,Revenue (Continued)
Land Use 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Residential 1
Single Family
Dwelling Units 123 123 123 123 123
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646
Fee Revenue $ 79,584 $ 79,584 $ 79,584 $ 79,584 $ 79,584
Multifamily
Dwelling Units 296 296 296 296 296
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404
Fee Revenue $ 119,508 $ 119,508 $ 119,508 $ 119,508 $ 119,508
Total Residential Fee Revenue $ 199,092 $ 199,092 $ 199,092 $ 199,092 $ 199,092
Nonresidential 1
Office
1,000 Square Feet 90 90 90 90 90
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185
Fee Proceeds $ 16,700 $ 16,700 $ 16,700 $ 16,700 $ 16,700
Cornrnercial
1,000 Square Feet 106 106 106 106 106
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95
Fee Proceeds $ 10,036 $ 10,036 $ 10,036 $ 10,036 $ .10,036
Industrial
1,000 Square Feet 22 22 22 22 22
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81
Fee Proceeds $ 1,747 $ 1,747 $ 1,747 $ 1,747 $ 1,747
Total Nonresidential Fee Revenues $ 28,483 $ 28,483 $ 28,483 $ 28,483 $ 28,483
Total Fee Revenues $ 227,575 $ ,227,575 $ 227,575 $ 227,575 $ 227,575
Note: Fee revenue not adjusted for inflation.
1 Growth between 2002 and 2025 in annual increments in residential DUE's and non-residential square footage is
estimated on growth factors in five year periods as derived from ABAG Projections 2000 data.
Sources: Public Facilities Fee Studv. 1998 Vodate oreoared bv Hausrath Economics Grouo: MuniFinancial.
MUNIFINANaAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 13
CiTYOF DUBUN
5D ~t/ :3 b
FIRE FAaLlTIES lMPAcr FEE
Table 8: Projected Annual Fire Facility Fee Revenue (Continued)
Land Use 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2001 - 2025
Residential 1
Single Family
Dwelling Units 121 121 121 121 121 3,037
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646 $ 646
Fee Revenue $ 78,466 $ 78,466 $ 78,466 $ 78,466 $ 78,466 $ 1,961,654
Multifamily
Dwelling Units 292 292 292 292 ' 292 7,291
Fee per Dwelling Unit $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404 $ 404
Fee Revenue $ 117,829 $ 117,829 $ 117,829 $ 117,829 $ 117,829 $ 2,945,731
Total Residential Fee Revenue $ 196,295 $ 196,295 $ 196,295 $ 196,295 $ 196,295 $ 4,907,385
Nonresidential 1
Offi ce
1,000 Square Feet 74 74 74 74 74 1,857
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185
Fee Proceeds $ 13,745 $ 13,745 $ 13,745 $ 13,745 $ 13,745 $ 343,614
Commercial
1,000 Square Feet 87 87 87 87 87 2,174
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95 $ 95
Fee Proceeds $ 8,259 $ 8,259 $ 8,259 $ 8,259 $ 8,259 $ 206,487
Industrial
1,000 Square Feet 18 18 18 18 18 444
Fee per 1,000 Square Feet $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81 $ 81
Fee Proceeds $ 1 ,438 $ 1 ,438 $ 1,438 $ 1,438 $ 1 ,438 $ 35,948
Total Nonresidential Fee Revenues $ 23,442 $ 23,442 $ 23,442 $ 23,442 $ 23,442 $ 586,049
Total Fee Revenues $ 219,737 $ 219,737 $ 219,737 $ 219,737 $ 219,737 $ 5,493,434
Note: Fee revenue not adjusted for inflation,
1 Growth between 2002 and 2025 in annual increments in residential DUE's and non-residential square footage is
estimated on growth factors in five year periods as deriveq from ABAG Projections 2000 data.
Sources: Public Facilities Fee Studv199B UDdate oreoared bv Hausrath Economics Grouo"'MuniFinancial
MUNIFlNANaAL
FINAL REPORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 14
eEl 06 3~
CiTYoF DUBLIN
FIRE FAaLITIES IMPAcr FEE
Table 9: Financing Plan
FY Endina June 30 2002 2003 2004 2005
Beainnina Fund Balance 1 $ 911,427 $ $ $
Revenues
Fee Revenues $ 339,855 $ 339,855 $ 339,855 $ 339,855
Other Sources2 1,237,220 (339,855) (339,855) (339,855)
Bond Proceeds
Annual Revenues $ 1,577,075 $ $ $
Expenditures
Station #17 $ 2,488,502 $ $ $
Station #18
Debt Service3
Annual Expenditures $ 2,488,502 $ $ $
Ending Fund Balance $ $ $ $
1 Balance in Fire Irnpact Fee Fund as of July 1. 2001 provided by City of Dublin staff.
2 Other Sources: Represents funding from the general fund to pay for existing development's fair share
of new fire facilities as well as interirn loans from the general fund. Negative amounts represent
repayment of general fund loans. The net funding from other sources plus the beginning impact fee
fund balance represents existinQ developments fair share of fundinQ for new fire facilities.
3 Debt financinQ based on 5% interest cost, $3.6mm financinQ cost and 10 year bond term.
Sources: Table 2 and 8: MuniFinancial.
MUNIFINANaAL
FINAL REPORT - OcrOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 15
CiTYOFDuiJi.rJi;;
3:2 c(.3;b
FIRE FACIL1TIES IMPAcr FEE'
Iab'~.9,:Einanc:ingR.lanJCQntinLJ~d)
FYEndina June 30. 2006 2007 2008 200,9 2010
Beqinninq /Fund Balance 1 $ $ $ ,$ $
Revenues
Fee Reven~es $ 203,692 $ 203,692 $ 203,89? $ 40:3,~92 $ 203,892
Other Sources2 265.108 265.108 265. to~ 2~5,1 08 265.108
Bond Proceeds 3.474.050
AnriTjal ReVenues $ 3;943;050 $ 469,000 $ 469,000 $ 469,000 $ 469,000
Expenditures
Station #t7 $ $ $ '$ $
Station #18 3,474,050
Debt Service 3 469.000 469.000 469.000 469.000 469.000
Annual Expenditures $ 3;943;050 $ 469,000 $ 469,060 $ 469,000 $ 469,000
Ending Fund Balance $ $ $ $ $
1 Bi3lancein Fire h'npact Fee ~l.lndas of J91Y 1; 2001prbvided bv Citvof Doblinstaff.
2 Other S.ources:. Represents funding from the general fund to pay for existin9, development's fair share of new fire
facilities a~.well.as interim loans from the gen~ral fund. Negative amounts represent repayment of ~eneral fund loans.
The n~t funding, from other sources plus the beginning impact fee fund balance represents existing developments fair
share of fundino for new fire facilities.
3 Debt financinq based on 5% interest cost. $3.6mm financinq cost and 10 year bond term.
Sources: Table 2 and 8: MuniFinancial.
MUNlFlNANaAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 16
CiTY OF DUBLIN
Table 9: Financing Plan (Continued)
FY Endina June 30
Beqinninq Fund Balance 1
Revenues
Fee Revenues
Other Sources2
Bond Proceeds
Annual Revenues
Expenditures
Station #17
Station #18
Debt' Service 3
Annual Expenditures
Ending Fund Balance
2011
$
$
175,599 $
293.401
2012
$
175,599 $
293.401
469,000 $
$
469.000
469,000 $
$
3.5
crt
":3./
.....I1cO
2014
$
175,599 $
293.401
469,000 $
$
469.000
469,000 $
$
FIRE FAaLlTIESIMPAcrFEE
2015
$
175,599
293,401
469,000
$
469.000
469,000
$
1 Balance in Fire Impact Fee Fund as of Julv 1, 2001 provided by City of Dublin staff.
2 Other Sources: Represents funding from the general fund to pay for existing development's fair share of new fire
facilities as well as interim loans from the general fund. Negative amounts represent repayment of general fund loans.
The net funding from other sources plus the beginning impact fee fund balance represents existing developments fair
share of fundinQ for new fire facilities.
3 Debt financinQ based on 5% interest cost. $3.6mm financinQ cost and 10 year bond term.
Sources: Table 2 and 8: MuniFinancial.
$
469,000 $
$
$
469,000
469,000 $
MUNlFINANaAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
$
2013
$
175,599 $
293.401
469,000 $
$
469.000
469,000 $
$
PAGE 17
CiTYOF DUBLIN
3Y '1f 36
FIRE FAaLlTIESlMPAcr FEE '
Table 9: Financing Plan (Continued)
FY Endina June 30 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Beginning Fund Balance 1 $ $ $ $ $
Revenues
Fee Revenues $ 227,575 $ 227,575 $ 227,575 $ 227,575 $ 227,575
Other Sources2 (227,575) (227,575) (227,575) (227.575) (227,575)
Bond Proceeds
Annual Revenues $ $ $ $ $
Expenditures
Station #17 $ $ $ $ $
Station #18
Debt Service3
Annual Expenditures $ $ $ $ $
Ending Fund Balance $ $ $ $ $
1 Balance in Fire Impact Fee Fund as of July 1, 2001 provided by City of Dublin staff.
2 Other Sources: Represents funding from the general fund to pay for existing development's fair share of new fire
facilities as well as interim loans from the general fund. Negative arnounts represent repayment of general fund loans,
The net funding from other sources plus the beginning impact fee fund balance represents existing developments fair
share of fundina for new fire facilities.
3 Debt financina based on 5% interest cost, $3.6mm financina cost and 10 year bond term.
Sources: Table 2 and 8: MuniFinancial.
MUNIFINANClAL
FINAL REpORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 18
CiTYOP DUBliN
j:5 t:rf 36
FIRE'FAaLlTIESIMPAcr FEE
Table 9: Financing Plan (Continued)
FY Endina June 30 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2001-2025
Beainnina Fund Balance 1 $ $ $ $ $ $ 911,427
Revenues
Fee Revenues $ 219,737 $' 219,737 $ 219,737 $ 219,737 $ 219,737 $ 5,493,434
Other Sources2 (219,737) (219,737) (219,737) (219,737) (219,737) 773,641
Bond Proceeds 3.474.050
Annual Revenues $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,741,125
Expenditures
Station #17 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,488,502
Station #18 3,474,050
Debt Service3 4.690.000
Annual Expenditures $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,652,552
Ending Fund Balance $ $ $ $ $ $
1 Balance in Fire Impact Fee Fund as of Julv 1. 2001 provided bv City of Dublin staff,
2 Other Sources: Represents funding from the general fund to pay for existing development's fair share of new fire
facilities as well as interim loans from the general fund, Negative amounts represent repayment of general fund loans,
The net funding from other sources plus the beginning impact fee fund balance represents existing developments fair
share of fundinQ for new fire facilities,
3 Debt financinQ based on 5% interest cost. $3.6mm financinQ cost and 10 year bond term,
Sources: Table 2 and 8: MuniFinancial.
The fire facilities impact fee would be collected at time of building permit
issuance. To implement the fee the City should:
. Maintain an annual Capital Improvement Program budget to indicate
where fees are being expended to accommodate growth;
. Comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of
Gmen1m::nt Ccxie 66001 and 66006.; and
. Identify appropriate inflation indexes in the fee ordinance and allow
an automatic inflation adjustment to the fee annually.
MUNlFINANaAL
FINAL REPORT - OCTOBER 18, 2000
PAGE 19
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
Non-Residential
Commercial
Office
Industrial
3b ~
"" /
"'::;0
PROPOSED FIRE FACILITY FEE
(by Land Use Type)
$646 per unit
$404 per unit
$.095 per square foot
$.185 per square foot
$.081 per square foot
EXHIBIT C