Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 027-91 TriVlyForecastModel RESOLUTION N0. 27-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, THE CITY OF DUBLIN, AND THE CITY OF LIVERMORE FOR FUNDING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRI-VALLEY TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL WHEREAS, the five Tri-Valley Cities (Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, Danville, and San Ramon) and two Counties (Alameda and Contra Costa) entered into a joint powers agreement to work together to attempt to solve common area-wide transportation problems; and WHEREAS, the first step in this process is proposed to be development of a local travel forecasting computer model; and WHEREAS, Dublin's share of the cost of development of the model is $24,750; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby approves the cooperative agreement between the Contra Costa Transportation Authority and the Alameda jurisdictions; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the agreement. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this llth day of March, 1991. AYES: Councilmembers Burton, Howard, and Mayor Snyder NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmembers Je~~ ~/~ Y ATTEST: ORIGII,?\L Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN ' THE CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, THE CITY OF DUBLIN, AND THE CITY OF LIVERMORE FOR THE FUNDING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRI-VALLEY TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this Z.O~'' day of F'E~., 1991, by and between. the CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "AUTHORITY', and the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, the CITY OF PLEASANTON, the CITY OF DUBLIN, and the CITY OF LIVERMORE, hereinafter referred to as "ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS". RECrrALS The following recitals are part of this AGREEMENT: .. 1. AUTHORITY and ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS wish to jointly develop a computerized Tri-Valley Travel Forecasting Model (hereinafter referred to as "MODEL") capable of forecasting traffic within the following jurisdictions and areas: City of Pleasanton, . City of Dublin, City of Livermore, City of San Ramon, Town of Danville, their spheres of influence, and selected unincorporated areas of Alameda and. Contra Costa Counties, including Alamo and the Tassajara and Dougherty Valleys, hereinafter referred to as 'TRI- VALLEY". 2. Representatives from AI-AMEDA JURISDICTIONS, Contra Costa County, City-of San Ramon, and Town of Danville serve on the TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL (hereinafter referred to as 'TVTC") which serves as a forum to address transportation issues in the TRI-VALLEY. '3. A qualified transportation engineering and planning consulting firm (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT') shall develop MODEL under contract with AUTHORITY. CONSULTANT shall develop MODEL in accordance with the Scope of Work and Milestone Schedule shown in Exhibit A, which is hereby incorporated into this AGREEMENT and made a part hereof. 4. Each jurisdiction in TVTC shall designate a staff person and an alternate staff person .to participate in a TVTC MODEL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (hereinafter referred to as "MODEL TAG') to attend regularly scheduled meetings to review scope, schedule, budget, and technical issues that arise in development.of MODEL. 5. The MODEL.TAC shall provide technical direction to CONSULTANT on a consensus basis. 6. The Contra Cosha County Measure C has authorized AUTHORITY to expend monies for Regional Transportation Planning and Growth Management, including partial funding of MODEL. 7. Pursuant to State' legislation - AB 471 '(1989) and AB 1791 (1990) '- AUTHORITY has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency for'.Contra Costa County, and win work with TVTC to apply MODEL to prepare a Cotigesti0n Management Program and address traffic levels on regional routes in Contra Costa. 8. The jurisdictions' of Alameda-County are in the process of designating a Congestion Management Agency (hereinafter referred tO as "AI AMEDA CMA") that will prepare a Congestion Management Program and address traffic levels on regional routes in Alameda County.. 9. TVTC and-AUTHORITY wish to-participate in a cooperative planning process to address tran.qportation issues in the TRI-VALLEY. Joint development of MODEL is a key step in .develo. ping the tools necessary to address regional and local planning issues in the TRI-VALLEY. 10. The cost of MODEL shall be shared between AUTHORIT:Y and AI AMEDA JURISDICTIONS, with each paying fifty (50) percent. The total estimated cost for CONSULTANT to develop MODEL is $198,000. Costs greater than $198,000' shall be addressed in future amendments to this AGREEMENT and subject to the approval .of the parties hereof. , 11. AUTHORITY will provide $99,000 in Measure C sales tax revenues, to fund MODEL development. ' 12. ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS will provide $99,000 in funds for MODEL development. Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore Page 2 of 7 SECTION I .. ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS AGREE TO: 1. Fund fifty (50) percent of the cost. of MODEL development and initial baseline rum for the years 1990, '2000, and 2010, to an amount not to exceed $99,000. 2. Provide funding for the $99,000 referred to in Paragraph 1 above by payment to AUTHORITY of $24,750 from each of the four ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS by March 1, 1991. 3. Designate, for each ALAMEDA JURISDICTION, a specific staff liaison to be primary contact for AUTHORITY staff and CONSULTANT, and to attend regularly scheduled MODEL TAC meetings; SECTION II AUTHORITY AGREES T0: $99,000. Provide fifty (50) percent of the cost of MODEL to an amount not to exceed 2. Manage CONSULTANT effort and coordinate regular MODELTAC meeting arrangements for review of CONSULTANT progress. .- Management requested. Provide consultant management services through its staff,-and Growth- Consultant at no cost to the pa. ffies of this AGREEMENT. Respond to issues raised in a reasonable time franie. Make records available to AI_AMEDA JURISDICTIONS for:audit if Refund any excess funds remaining at ihe end of the CONSULTANT contract in amounts proportional to .original contribution .as a percent of total contribution. 7. Pay CONSULTANT in .a timely manner provided that CONSULTANT · submits invoices to AUTHORITY in accordance with AUTHORITY invoicing procedure. Cooperative Agreement No..45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleasaaron, Dublin, and Livermore Page 3 of 7 IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: SECTION III 1. MODEL will be housed, maintained, and updated in accordance with an agreement to be entered into between ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS, TVTC, ALAMEDA CMA, and AUTHORITY, and shall be available for use by all participating jurisdictions. 2. Term:. The term'of this .AGREEMENT will remain in effect until terminated as provided in Paragraph 3 of this Section. - 3. Termination: i~my party may terminate its paxcdcipation in this AGREEMENT at any time with caUse by giving written notice of terminati6n to all other parties which shall specify the effective date thereof. Notice of terminationunder this paragraph shall be given at least ninety (90) days before the effective date of such termination. -'In such event, the terminating party's remaining proportionate share of funds paid to AUTHORITY shall be refunded by AUTHORITY after payment of all outstanding obligations as of the effective date of such termination.. -. 4. Indemnity: It is mutually understood and agreed, relative to the mutual indemnification of AUTHORITY and AI .AMEDA JURISDICTIONS: a. . That neither AUTHORITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be'responsible for any damage or liability occu.r~ng., by reason of apything done or omitted to be- done by' under or in connection' with any' work,' authority or jurisdiction delegated to ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, .pursUant to Government Code Section 895.4, ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS shall. fully indemnify and hold the AUTHORITY harmless from any .liability imposed for injury as defined by Government Code Section 810.8 occurring by reason of anything done or Omitted to be done by ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS under this agreement or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS under this AGREEMENT. b. That neither AIAMEDA JURISDICTIONS, nor any :officer or employee thereof, ihall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by AUTHORITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to AUTHORFFY under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government .Code Section 895.4, AUTHORITY shall fully indemnify and hold ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS harml'ess from any liability imposed "for injury as defined by Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 · Between ConIra Costa Transportation Authority 'and' County of Ahmeda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and. Livermore Page 4 o f 7 Government Code Section 810.8 occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by AUTHORITY under this AGREEMENT or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction deleg:~ted to AUTHORITY under this AGREEMENT. 5. Ownership: MODEL shall become the mutual property of ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS and AUTHORITY, and may be transferred to TVTC upon mutual consent of all paxties. 6. NOtices: Any notice which may be required under this AGREEMENT shall be in. writing, shall be effective when received, and shall be given by personal sen, ice, or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, tO the addresses set forth below, or .to such addresses which may be specified in writing to 'the paxties hereto: ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS: Dennis R. Fay Manager, Transportation Planning County of Alameda Public Works AgenCy 399 ElmhUrst Street Hayward, CA 94544-1395 Deborah Acosta City Manager City of Pleasanton 123 Main Street ' P.O. Box 520 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Richard C. Ambrose, City Manager City of Dublin' P. O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568. Lee Horuer, City Manager City of Livermore 1052 South LiVermore Avenue Livermore, CA 94555 AUTHORITY: Robert K. McCleary Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority 2702 Clayton .Road, Suite 202 Concord, CA 94519 7. Additional Acts and Documents: Each party agrees to do all such things and take all such actions, and to make, execute and deliver such other documents and instruments, as shall be reasonably requested to 'carry out the provisions, intent and purpose of this AGREEMENT. Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation AUthority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore Page 5 of 7 · 8. lntegi-ation: This AGREEMENT represents the entire AGREEMENT of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and all such agreements entered into prior hereto are revoked and superseded by this AGREEMENT, and no representations, warranties, inducements or oral agreements have been made by any of the parties except as expressly set forth herein, or in. other contemporaneous written agreements. 9. Amendment: This AGREEMENT may not be changed, modified or rescinded except in writing, signed by all parties hereto, 'and any attempt at oral modification of this AGREEMENT shall be void and of no effect. 10. Independent Agency: ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS render their oversight and staff participation in development of MODEL under this AGREEMENT .as independent agencies. None of the ALAMEDA JURISDICTIONS' agents or employees shall be agents or employees of the AUTHORITY. AUTHORITY renders .its oversight and staff participation in development of MODEL under this AGREEMENT as an ind6pendent agency. None of the AUTHORITY,S agents or employees shall be agents or employees of the AI AMEDA JURISDICTIONS. 11. Assignment: This' AGREEMENT may not be assigned, transferred, hypothecated, or pledged by any party without the express written consent of all other parties. 12. Binding on Successorsl Etc.:. This AGREEMENT shall be binding upon the · successors, assigns or transferees of the AUTHORITY or A!-AMEDA JURISDICTIONS as the case may be. This provision shall not be construed as an authori.za. tion to assign/ · transfer, hypothecate or pledge this AGREEMENT other than as provided above. 13. Severability: Should any part of this AGREEMENT be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or beyond the authority of either party to enter into or .carry out, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this AGREEMENT which shall continue in full force and effect; provided thit, the remainder of this AGREEMENT can, absent the excised portion, reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.' Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleas. anton, Dublin, and Livermore Page 6 of 7 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA by: Mary King President / CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Chair Execuiive Director C~ CITY OF PLEASANTON Deborah Acosta City Manager cITY OF DUBLIN Richard C. AmbroSe City Manager CITY OF LIVE. fi~_O RE by: '" ' City Manager Approved as to legal form and content: by: County of Alameda General Counsel by: City of Pleasanton Leg~>,~C~el Legal Counsel mre:planning:trimodLcop by: of/~ublin 2~]~ j City Legal Counsel Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, DUblin, and Livermore Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK AND MILESTONE SCHEDULE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRI-VALLEY EMMFJ2 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL CONSULTANT shall develop a validated Tri-Valley EMMFd2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model Valley Model). The Tti-Valley Model shall have an appropriate level of detail to adequa~ly add.ross the needs of the counties and the Authority, as well as of each individual dry, to conduct major Iratile impact studies, etlVilOnmenta! analyse~ evaluate alteriia~ve. transpo~ation improvement strategies, and support the requirements of Proposi.'tions 111 and 108. The Td-Vallcy MOdel ~ be a nested subset of' the Alameda and Con Costa.Countywidc models, w.hich, in turn, are a subset of the regional lVlTC travel demand model system.. The T~-Valley Model will be consistent with the MTC models, as well as the Contra Cosha cotmtywt.'de and subregional models and The Td-Valley Model shall'be capable of projecting AM and' PM peak hour, as well as ADT, forecasts for the highway netw. ork, including major intersection mining movements for 1990 (exis~g conditions) and the forecast. years.2000 and 2010. - " ,' APPROACH AND MEtHODOLOGY CONSULTANT shall develop the Tti-Valley Model fronl the existing ConIra Costa and Alameda County EMME/2 models. Both of these models have been developed to nest within the lvITC iegional m~lel and .dam base. CONSULTANT shall "focus" model refinement on ihe "subarea' called ihe Td-Valley~ which includes the Town of Danville, the Cities of Hyermom, San Ramon, Dublib, and Pleasanton, their spheres of influence, and selected unincorporated axeas of Alameda .and Contra Costa Counties, including Alamo and the Tassajara and Doughc~y Valleys, but not Castxo Valley. CONSULTANT sitall develop a .substantially more detailed zone system and roadway network within and immediately bordering thi.~ subaxea. Tri-Valley Model shall provide significant additional detail than is currently available at the cotmtywidc level and shall include minor arte~als, selected collectors, and tunring movements at all major intersections for which counts are available. The T~-Valley Model shall provide a zonal levd of detail equal to or greater than the existing TJKM Tfi-Val!.ey model Or a level of .detail mutually agreed upon with the jurisdictions. Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation AUthority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublith and Livermore Exhibit A Page 1 of 13 Task 1: Review Existing Transportation Models and Land Use RequiremenLs Purpose The puq>ose of this task is to review the existing Alameda and ConIra Costa Countywide models, and the existing TJKM Tfi-VaHey model, to identify differeaccs and determine which model structure to apply for Lhc Tri-VaHey. area. TMs task also involves ~viewing the ~_a~;s of the technical inputs to the Alameda and Contain Costa countywide and subregional models to assure consistency'among-the models. Approach and Methodology Pursuant to the passage of Proposition IlL Alameda and ConIra Cost~ Counties Gill develop congestion management programs which' require that the Tri-Valley model be consistent with MT.C's modeling .' methodology and assumptions. Also, a methodology that incorporates both the Alameda and Contra Costa models will need to be develo.pgd. It is anticipated-that thl_~ will involve writing a program that incorporates ConIra Costa trip generation models and data for the zones in ConIra Cosm County and the · Alamed,{ trip generation model and land use for zones within .Alameda CoLmty. The modeling methodology WiH be reviewed with MTC staff for approval Product .The product of thi~ task will be a .t~:hnical report docttmenting.~ the model that will be used in the Tri- Valley area. This report shall be seat to the MTC for their review and approvaL' To:ensure that the consistency standard is met, the CONSULTANT shah meet with the MTC to answer any questions they may have. Task 2:. Network/Zone System Definition Puttrose The CONSULTANT shall design the focused zonal system and the detailed highway and transit networks for the Tri-Valley area model Network definition sitall include proper location of traffic zone "centtold" connector links and other network details. CONSULTANT shall review the location and number of traffic zones and centmid connectors with each locality and incorporate comments. Approach and Methodology Traffic Zone System: Definition of the zonal. system to be used for the Tti-Valley model will be the · responsibility of the CONSULTANT. Using AAA base maps, the CONSULTANT shah prepare a Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Exhibit A Between Coatra Costa Transportation Authority and Page 2 of 13 County of Alameda, Pleasdnton, Dublin, and Livermore preliminary draft and a draft version of a refined zone structure for Tri-Valley that will be submitted to · the jurisdictions, the counties,. and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority for review. Based upon the jurisdictions' comments, a final zone map will be prepared and distributed to the jurisdictions. the -. counties, and the Authority. The refined zone system will comist of subsets of the individual county-level structures, the 1980 census tracts, and MTC's 550-zone system. To the extent possible, zone boundaries shall conespond with city jurisdictional limits. The remaining portions of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties Shall be ctinsistent with MTC' s 550-zone system. In the other Bay Area cormties, the aggregated zone size shall conespond with the MTC superdistricts. Highway Network: CONSULTANT .shall refine the highway network to provide a suitable level of detail The networks shall include freeways, .major and minor artedals, and selected collector streets. The CONSULTANT shall assure that all FAU (Federal Aid Urban) routes'will'be included in the-network Us'rag AAA base map, the'CONSULTANT sbal_!_ prepare preliminary draft and draft roadway' maps showing the. proposed strea'system tq.. be included in 'the network, including critical roadway characteristics, such as number of lanes; facility type (fre~.ways, arterials, collectors), and area type (ke., CBD, residential, rural). These maps will be sent to each of the jurisdictions for review. Based on their comments, the network definition will be .Transit Networks: The CONSULT.ANT shall review and update the transit networkS previously developed for the countywidi inodels. The networks will be reviewed by transit operators against cttr~,mt service practices and shill be updated by the CONSULTa~NT as required. Etut Product "' The end product of this task will be a reproducible map showing the refined zone system, and madway maps displaying the roadway facilities to be coded in-the network, including the critical roadway characteristics, such as facility type and number oi5 lanes.-. Task 3: Update Demographic Data Base Purllose .. CONSULTANT shah develop the land use and demographic data for the base year.(1990) and two future years (2000 and 2010) necessary to do the model validation and produce the travel forerests. Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, pleasanton, Dublin, and 'Livermore Exhibit A Page 3 of 13 Approach and Methodology The travel demand model requires land use and demographic data input at the appropriate zone level for all nine Bay Area counties. For the purpose of land use dam collection, the nine Bay Area counties will be divided into rite following regional areas: Region 1. Region 2. Region 3. Region 4. Region 5. Tri-Valley area llxe remainder of Contra Costa County The remainder of Alameda County Other seven Bay Area counties San Joaquin Co .tmty. The data. inputs for the zones within Regions 1, 2, and 3 consist of the following variables: 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Number of Households HouSehold Population Employed Residents Household Income (expressed in 1979 or 1980 $) Retail Emplbyment Service Employment Other Employment Total Zonal Acres Diablo Valley An.d Contra C0sta College Enrollment. Alameda County Model d_a_ta rcxtuitexnents. For the axei external to Regions I, 2, and 3, only the total number of jobs and households for each traffic zone wilt be prepared. The zonal m'acture in areas outside Regions 1, 2, and 3 are at a greatly aggregated level that shall'only require household and empIoyment variable in order to produci travel fo.mcists. Economic and Planning Systems (EPS), as a subconsultant to Barton-Aschraan, with partk:ipation of Alameda County and Contra Costa County staff and the Tti-Valley jurisdictions, shall create the data base system containing detailed exisling and future.land use assumptions for all the traffic zones within Contra Co. sta County and the Alameda County portion of the Tri-Valley area forthe years 1990, 2000, at;td 2010. With this data base system,' land use and demogiaphic data files for Regions 1 and 2 will be created to be used as the input for the 'm'.'p generation model EPS contribution to the land use and demographic i.nput refinement will consist of the following effort: Improvement/modi~catipn of the existing computer data base system. EPS shall use 'dam base management programs used for the Contra Costa County General Plan as the. building block for this application. Modifications shall be Cooperative Agreement No. 45.0]L.00 Exhibit A Between Contra Costa'Transportation Authority and Page 4 of 13 County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livdrmore made to reflect the refined zone system. New data gathered from the participating jurisdictions shall be added to the data base. EPS will provide system support to file cities on an as-neLded basis. Data Collection and ResearctL liPS with assistance of Alameda County and Contra Costa County staff and the participating C[lies o.f San RamOn. Livermore. Dublin, Pleasanton and the town of DanviII.e. shall prepare the 1990. 2000. and 2010 land uSe. and demographic data. EPS shill provide the cities with data specifications and the data formats and shall provide overall guidance to the participating jurisdictions in the data collection eftoff. The 2010' land use projection, prepared by EPS. will be" constructed using rend line analysis from ABAG projections.. other available projections, market data, and land capacity analysis. · Docttrnet~tafion. · -. EPS shall prepare' documentation deseiibing. the data sources, estimated relationships'and other assumptions used in the development of the 1990. 2000. and'2010 land nse data basis. EPS will pSepare comparison spreadsheets showing the existing (1990) and future (2000 and 2010) land use and demographic assumptions by zone and jurisdiction. These assumptions will l:e submitled to the jurisdictions and MTC for .review and comments. Years 1990, 2000, and 2010 household and .employment data for ineas external to Regions 1, 2 and 3 shall be consWacted by the CONSULTANT based upon available data' from the Alameda .Countywide. Transportaa'on P/an, from the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAft) projections, available lVlTC data, and external travel data from Caltrans~ ff nece~ary, year 2010 household and employment projections shill be adjusted in order to obtain an acceptable job/housing ratio in the region. End Product The end product of this task will be computer data ties coBtaining the land use and demograpl~c variables for each traffic zone within Conlra Costa County and the Alameda County portion of the Tfi-Valley area. as well as for the zones representing the remainder of the Bay .,Area counties for 1990, 2000 an;t 2010. Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between ConIra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore Exhibff A Page 5 of 13 Task Network Coding Purpose CONSULTANT shall code the highway and transit networks based on the roadway and transit definitions from Task 2. Approach and Methodology The Alameda and ConIra Costa County highway networks shaIl b~ .used'as the basis for the netwo~ development in Tri-Valley. Beyond freeways and major and selected minor arterials, which are' cun~iay present within the counties' networks, the complete set of minor af~ials and selected collectors as defined in Task 2 shall be added to the highway network. CONSULTAI~ shall refine the network in the areas surrounding Tri-.Valley, in order to be~ter reflect travel patterns between Tri-Valley 'and outlying areas. The peak-hour and off-peak period .transit networks, Obtained. from the existing alam~da Countywide network. shall be upd~xt and implemented in the model The contra Costa' County 'network shall be incoxporated into fi,js network, ,. End Product ." . ~ The end product of this task wilt be a base year (I~90) highway and transit network, inchding centroid cotlnectoF loca~otLg, repre~extt]llg a'd~ transporta~on 8y~r~ll hi and immediately bordet:tilg the Valley area. Task 5: Traffic Data Requirements Purpose The purpose of thi.~ ~_~-_~: is to ob~_in~ current year (1990) traffic count data .for use in validating the Tri- Valley subarea travel demand models. Approach and Methddology Mainline traffic counts on freeways, expressways, and arterials shotrid be provided for an average weekday as we.t1 as for both th~ AM and PM peak hours. Intersection count data should include AM and PM peak- Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Exhibit A Between ConIra Co~ta Transportation Authority and Page 6 of 13 Cotrely of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore hour turning movements at major arterials. including on- and off-rampS. The CON. SULTANT shall request existing roadway and intersection .traffic counts fnim Caltrans and from each jurisdiction_ The CONSULTANT shall review and compile this count data 'and prepare a list of proposed Iocalions where additional counts will be necessary. Following review by the jurisdictions. each individual jurisdiction will conduct additional traffic counts as required. Daily transit ridership information (for BART, B.ART Express, County Connection and LAVTA) will be collecled by the CONSULTANT. End Product The end product of this task will be a set of current roadway traffic counts and intersection tu.ming-- movement counts for use in validating the T~-Valley travel demand model. The count localions and dates shall be illustrated on a map of the area. Task 6: Model Implementation Ptupose The purpose of this task'is to get ..the model up .and nmning by implementing the travel. demand model -within the EMME/2 traxtsportation planning software, ' Approach and Methodology lifts tz. sk iuvolvcs upd_atinE tl~ model application procedures to reflect the revised zonalstmcmm. The same travel demand model stmcatre as either of the cotmtywide models shall be used in order to ensure cousistext.cy with the countywide travel demand models. The 1990 land use and demographic data tieS, developed in Task 3, sb_~!! be used as input for the selecXed trip g&ncration program. The mathematical equations representing the trip distribution, modal choice.models, and the.assignment procedure, sb_~l! be upda?_d in thd ~ software. User friendly macros sban be created to allow application of the various moddlng procexlures in sequence without manual intervention. End Product . The end product of this effort will be 'an execumble travel demand forecasting' model for the Td-Valley area that will be validated. in Task 8, Cooperative Agreement No.' 45.01.00 - Between Contr.a Costa Transportation Authority and ' County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore Exhibit A Page 7 of 13 - /5"' Task 7: Traffic Engineering Programs Purpose The focus of this task is to develop the data base files that are used by computer program-~ to convert' EMME/2 output to a format readable by trallic engineering level of s~.rvice'progmms. These ~es are also used in the validation effortto. compare counted intersection turning movements with model-forecasted taming movements. Approach and Methodology The CONSULTANT shall create a turning-movement fie imd a geographic correspondence ~e for each counted intersection. These ~es shall be t~sed to automate the validation effort by creating a comparison table of counted and EMME/2-simulated turning moiements for these intersections. The CONSULTANT will de~/elop separate computerpr6grams to take data from EMMF./2 output adjusted b.asgd on existing count d_a_ta__, which will be combined with descriptions of interse~,-'tion geometries (such as the.number of lades for each movement, signal p.~, eta) to perform intersection level of service b, alcula~ons for various level of service pmgrfl. m:s, .such as tile V/C program. 'The VIC program will include the Fumess .adj.us~ment procedure' for inletsecaon analysis. ' '-The CONSULTANT shall-perform AM and PM peak-hour level of service calc:xlatious at 80 to 85 major intersec~om. in the Td-Vall.ey area. These intersections include all ramp terminals and most major arterial' infersections within'lIB study axea. The level of service. analysis will be performed forthe 1990, 21300 and 2010 traffic conditions. The CONSULTANT, in conjunction with the jurisdictions, will provide the 1990. (existing3 AM and PM peak-hour taming-movement counts at the selected intersections as well as the intersection characteristics, such as the number of lanes, sigxml phasing, etc., for those intersections for the existing (1990) conditions and for the two forecast years. Individual judsdictums '.shall be responsible for analysis of the intersectloft End P~'oduct The end product of this t$1c will be a set of computer programs and necessary Output tables showing existing. and projected intersection ruing mov~tnents, and level of service at intersections calctfiated from adjusted model output. For each intersection, the .CONSULTANT shall submit all output data for review. Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore Exhibit A Page 8 of 13 Task 8: Model Validation Purpose The purpose of this task is to adjust the model so that the travel demand modeling system produces realistic, validated eitimates of current uaffic-~ow panems in'the Tri-Valley area. Approach and Methodology The CONSULTANT shall execute the trip generation. trip distribution, modal split. and trip assignment modules for the 1990 base year' and measu/e the accuracy of the model against actual traffic volumes. The CONSULTANT shah v~date the model to the following tolerances, by jurisdiction, for ADT, and peak-hour directional traffic or levels mutually agreed upon by the Authority, the Counties and jurisdictions.' · Seventy-five percent of freeway link volumes will be within +/- 20 percent. Fifty percent of fleeway ~ volumes will be within +1-10 percent. Seventy-five percent of major aaerial link volumes will be within +/- 30 percratE Fifty percent of major aaedal link volumes w~l be within +/- 15. percent. " .Intersection movements. imatex thart 1,0130 velficles per hour -- 50 percent wi/l be within +/- :20. percent. .. 'Intersection movements bet~.eea 500 and i,000 vehicles per hour --30 percent wiil.~.~.'' within +/- 20 percent. Thes~ tolerances are basid on direct output from Fxnmed2 and do not inchde any manual adjustments. Higher tolerances will be achieved by m.anually adjusting the 'model ou~ut and developing, where appropriate, factors to big the model generated numbers closer to the counts. ~! Intersection turning movements Will be estimated based on using the Femess adjusttnent method as descrilid in the Authority's Techiical Procedure Manual The intersection-analysis will be conducted using adjusted volumes. The CONSULTANT shah prepare detailed compaxisous of observed and estimated average daily (and AM and PM peak-hour) traffic volumes at critical roadway sections and screenlin.ei, as. well as peak-hour turning-movement vohtmes at intersections in the Tri-V'alley area to test the models' accuracy. Based on the results. adjustments shah be made in the modeling process, and new model runs shall be performed - Exhibit A Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.. 00 Between ConIra Costa Transportation Authority and Page 9 of 13 County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore until the model output reasonably agreeS. with observed traffic flows. If necessary for validation. the need for special generators shall be analyzed. CONSULTANT shall analyze transit ~der~ip projections, make comparisons with the data collected in Task 4, and adjust 'the model to validate transit-passenger levels. Etut Product The end product of this'-task will be a validated T~-Valley travel area forecasting model The CONSULTANT shall provide plots and appropriate tabulations for review by the jurisdictions. Task 9: Travel Forecasts Purpose The p~ of thig task iS to produce year 2000 and yem- 2010'forecasts for the Tri-Valley area. Approach and Methodoloo~ The CONSULTANT will meet with staff from the T~-V~tlley eities~ the Authority, the eo'u~ies, Caltrans, and transit agencies (B~tRT and LAVFA): to obtain ~rtation plans that are likely to be implemented' by 2000 and 2010. CONSULTANT shall sitbruit the plan improvements to Alameda County and the . Authority for their mvie.w and ai~proVal for inclusion into the future networks. CONSULTANT shall code plan improvements in~ .the model to develop 2000 and 2010 highway and transit network alternatives for the T~-Valley area. The conestxmding land use. and demographic data for 2000 and 2010 developed in Task 3 shall be input into the modal to project future travel The CONSULTANT shall nm the model to produce the 2000 and 2010 forexam. CONSULTART shall check the reasonableness of the forecasts by comparing screenline and link-leveI data with existing traffic .and validated 1990 model output. CONSOLTA_NT shall analyze the following model outputs: AM and PM peak-hour and average daily traffic volumes on freeways and · arte~als. :. · AM and PM -peak-hour turning movements and level of service projections at . .Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County.of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore Exhibit A Page 10 of 13 AM and daily transit ridccship on BART. County Connection and LAVTA. CONSULTANT slmll adjust the model to obtain forecasts that appear reasonable wl~n compared with existing data and future employment and population data. End Product The product of this task will be a tec.hnical memorandm describing the approach. methodoIogy. assumptions, and tesuLIts of the year 2000 and year 2010 travel demand .forec, a~. Task 10: Documentation Purpose The purpose of this task is to prepare appropriate documentation of the travel demand model, and also prepare a user instnfctions manual.for co .rmct application of the foOxsed Tri-Valley ModeL Approach and Methodolo,,~ CONSULTANT shall prepare a Technical Report documenting the approach~ methodology, assumption and restfits of the Tri-Valley ModeL The report shall include existing count data and validation records in a technical appendix. The Technical Report shall describe the development and yalidation o1~ the travel demind moddL The report shall docttment the n&work/zone and land use assumptions, as well as the trip generation/distribution/assignment methodoloiies'for the Tri-Valley model step-by-step. CONSULTANT shah prepare a Users' Gtdde to provide-instmctlons for running the Tti-ValIey ModeL Included in the Guide shaI1 be computer-program-flow ,diagrams and the options and pacteli'used when executing the travel models as well as the utilization of separate programs that will convert model ou~ut to a suitable format for subsequent traffic engineering applications. End Product The end product of rifts task will be a Tec. hnical. Report and a Users' Guide for the Tri-Valley Model. Upon completion of the Tri-Valley TraveI Demand model. the CONSULTANT shah deliver all the hardware and software to the location designated by the Authority in conjunction with Alameda Counties and the. Td-Valley jurisdictions. Exhibit A Cooperative Agreement No. _45.01.00 Page 11 of 13 Between ConIra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore Task 11:- Meetings and Project Administration Purpose The purpose of this task is to provide a regular basis for coordination of activities to anticipate any scope or schedule changes and to document progress and performance throughout the agreement period. The task also includes coordination meefing~ with the.lVrFC, Caltrans. and local jurisdictions. Approach .. Trend mee. tings will be held on a monthly or "as-necessary" basis with repres~ita~ves of the Tri-Valley Transportatioa Council, the Auth0dty, and Contra Costa and Alameda County staffs, to review the stattu of the project.' The existing budget will allow for eight trend meetings. For each trend meeting, the CONSULTANT shall prepare the following items: Agenda: The agenda should address technical issues, scope/budget issues, three- week. horizon schedule, M~ster SchedUle, and percent-complete versus perc~- expended-. Four.Week Horizon 8chedu/e: Shows key current activities and those pl~n.~ during the next month. Key activities that span beyond .the month may be shown Action Items Lo~ Key :submittals and issues. for invoIved parties ~hould be shown on the Action Items Log. ff responses are expected, the initial due d-~ should be shown and the final date mortitored,.The log should give acontinuous chronology of the project from sfaxt to finish. However, only the most' recent action items need. to be attached to the agenda. Master Schedule: Shows key project activities through the completion date, with emphasis On deliyerabI.es, review periods. by jutisdi~o~/~ittees, and final submLn_~ls at the end of the contract duration. Master schedule should be date- specific and easily updatable, as activities may be added or deleted. Budget Status ;~.unlmary:' A table showing total budget, total expended, percent expended, percent complete (qualitative), budget remaining by task, and total budgeL Cooperative Agreement No. 45.01.00 Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and County of Alameda, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore" Exhibit A Page 12 of 13 Project Team Roster. A list of axe names, addresses, phone 'and FAX numbers of all involved parlies. _.The roster should be distributed at the. trend mc.~ng whenever it is revised. CONSULTANT shall prepare. the'above mate/.~ for-each trend' meeting. Agendas shall be distributed two days i~dor to the meeting. · FoRowing the meeting. CONSULTANT shall issue minutes within three working darts. ' ' ~ SCHEDU/~ bigure l displays a detailed time.schedule for each individual rusk. The 2000 and 2010 forecasts w/ll be completed seven months afternotice to proceed with docmnentation to f6How in'the eighth*m~mlL Th/s schedule shall be monitored through the trend meeting process. · ' ' Cooperative Agreement No. _45.01.00 Between ConIra Costa Transpor.tation Authority and Cotmty of Ala.meda, Pleasanton, 'Dublin, and Livermore 4 i ~4 'I i I I. i- I I I '.1 I I I ': I 1 I I I: i I I I ': i i I t ' I Exhibit A Page 13 of 13 COMMISSIONERS: Taylor Davis Chair Avon Wilson Ifice Chair Wayne Bennett Sharon J. Brown Catbryn R. Freitas David MacDiarmid Sunne W. McPeak Ronaid K. Mullin Evelyn Munn Tom Powers Tom To~akson Robert I~ McCleary Executive Director 1340 Treat Blvd. SuHe 150 Walnut Creek CA94596 Phofie: (415) 938-3970 (4 15) 938-3993 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO: FROM: City Managers, City Legal Counsels Royanne Boxell'~ Contra Costa Transportation Authority March 14, 1991 Now that the councils have approved the Cooperative Agreement between the Contra Costa Transportation AUthority and the County of Alameda, the City of Pleasanton, the City of Dublin, and the City of Livermore for the funding and development of the Tri-Valley travel forecasting model, we are in the process of getting signatures for seven copies (two for CCTA, two for Alameda'County, and one for each of the three cities). Please make sure that all 7 copies get signed and that you initial off your city below: Royanne Boxell, C.C. Transporation Authority 1340 Treat Blvd., Ste. 150 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 415-938-3970 Sheryl Nafie City of Livermore 1052 South Livermore Ave. Livermore, CA 94555 '415-373-5200 Kay Keck City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 415-833-6650 peggy Ezidro City of Pleasanton 123 Main St. Pleasanton, CA 94566 415-484-8199 Gloria Calhoun City of Alameda 1221 Oak St. Ste. 536 Alameda, CA. 94612 415-272-6694 We have arranged for a courier service to drop off and pick up the cooperative agreements from each location {DVC Courier, 833-0777}. The schedule is as follows: Authority, Royanne Pick up 3-15-91 @ 4:30 City of Livermore from Sheryl Drop off 3-18-91 @ 9:30, Pick up 3-18-91 @ 1:30 City of Dublin from Kay Drop off 3-18 @ 2:30, Pick up 3-19 @ 1:00. City of Pleasanton, Peggy Drop off 3-19 @ 2:00, Pick up 3-20 @ 1:00 County of Alameda Drop off 3-21 @ 8:30 Pick up 3-21 @ 12:30 Authority Drop off 3-21 @ 4:30 Please make sure this cover sheet stays with the package. Thank you for your help in this matter.