HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.3 EstbROW LinesDBCITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: June 13, 1988
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing: Establishment of Right-of-Way Lines
for Dublin Boulevard Between Donlon Way and Golden
Gate Drive (Continued from April 11 meeting)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
iA) Draft Ordinance indicating no protests received
lB) Draft Ordinance indicating protests received
2) Resolution Adopting Negative Declaration
3) Environmental Assessment
4) Proposed Negative Declaration
5) Planning Commission Resolution Recommending
Adoption of Negative Declaration (No. 88-012)
6) Planning Commission Resolution Recommending
Establishment of Plan Line (No. 88-013)
7) Planning Commission Minutes, March 7, 1988
8) A revised plan will be displayed at the Council
Meeting
RECOM}iENDATION:~)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Open public hearing
Receive Staff report and public testimony
Question Staff and the public
Close public hearing and deliberate
Adopt Resolution Adopting Negative Declaration
Waive reading and introduce ordinance iA or lB as
appropriate.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
These changes would substantially reduce the cost of
implementing these changes in the future. Costs to
the City as a result of development of the road would
depend on the financing mechanism selected for the
project. A separate action would be required by the
City Council to authorize financing the project.
DESCRIPTION:
At its regular meeting of April 11, 1988, Council
heard a presentation by Staff and testimony from the
public relating to the adoption of a plan line calling
for the widening of Dublin Blvd. between Amador Plaza
Road and Donlon Way.
The recommendation by the City's Traffic Engineer
included widenings for a triple left turn lane
westbound on Dublin Boulevard to southbound on San
Ramon Road together with additional turn lanes and bus
turn outs.
The City Council directed Staff to review the
feasibility of removing the bus turn outs at this time
to see if reduced lane width standards could lessen
the impacts on the adjacent properties without
jeopardizing the safety of the project.
TJKM has reviewed these issues and has recommended the
following changes:
1) A general narrowing of traffic lanes by 1 to
2 feet,
2) median narrowing and realignment, and
3) removal of bus turn outs.
The impacts on adjacent properties could be minimized
as follows:
1) Elimination of the need to take right-of-way
on the north-west corner of Dublin Blvd. and
San Ramon Rd. (76 Station)
2) reduction of needed right-of-way for the
right turn lane on the north-east corner of
Dublin Blvd. and San Ramon Rd. from 22 ft. to
8 ft. (Standard Station)
3) A reduction in the right-of-way need on the
~south-east corner of Dublin Blvd. and San
Ramon Rd. so that no parking is removed from
Bob's Big Boy
4) No right-of-way will now be needed on the
north-east corner of Dublin Blvd. and
Regional St. (Homestead Savings and Mervyns)
5) A reduction in right-of-way width along the
south-east corner of Dublin Blvd. and
Regional St. from 14 feet to 8 feet (Hibernia
Bank and Orchard Shopping Center). This will
only reduce the Orchard parking by a few
spaces rather than effecting about 36 spaces.
6) Removal of bus turn-outs on both sides of the
street, eliminating the need for Plan Line
revisions between Golden Gate Drive and
Amador Plaza Road.
Mr. Chris Kinzel of TJKM will be available to review
these differences at the meeting.
-2-
ORDINANCE NO. -88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ESTABLISHING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN DONLON WAY AND
GOLDEN GATE DRIVE
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution calling for a
public hearing to consider future right-of-way lines for Dublin Boulevard
between Donlon Way and Amador Plaza Road (Resolution No. 42-88) and set a
public hearing for April 11, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. to hear objections to the
establishment of said right-of-way lines; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was opened, the City Council provided
direction and continued the hearing to June 13, 1988; and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly given; and
WHEREAS, protests to establishment of said right-of-way line were
made by the owners of , which protests are hereby denied;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and ordains that:
Section 1. Right-of-way lines are hereby established for Dublin
Boulevard between Donlon Way and Golden Gate Drive, within the City of Dublin,
County of Alameda, State of California, as follows:
Ail additions to be in excess of the existing one-hundred foot
(100') adopted right-of-way:
as described in Exhibit 1 and as more particularly shown on that certain map
entitled "MAP SHOWING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN DONLON
WAY AND GOLDEN GATE DRIVE," dated June 2, 1988, and filed in the office of the
City Clerk on June 9, 1988, which map is hereby adopted as a precise plan of
said right-of-way lines.
Section 2. The effect of said right-of-way lines shall be
governed by the provisions of Dublin Ordinance No. 44-87.
Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE. This
Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after
the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause
this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of
Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of , 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Description for the adoption of right-of,way lines f6r Dublin
Boulevard between $~ Ramon Road and Donlon Way.
Commencing at the northwest corner of Parcel B of parcel Map
2834, Records of Alameda County, said point being on the south
line of Dublin Boulevard; thence northeasterly along said south
line 125 feet, more or less, .to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence continuing northeasterly along said south line of Dublin
Boulevard 235 feet, more or less, to an angle point in said
south line; thence easterly alon. g said south 1.fne 67.87 feet,
more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right
having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence easterly along the arc of
said curve to a point southerly 12.O0 feet, measured at right
angles to the south line of Dublin Boulevard at the true point
of beginning; thence leaving the south line of Dublin Boulevard
southwesterly on a course parallel with and southerly 12.00
feet, measured at right angles to the south line of Dublin
Boulevard at the true point of beginning a distance of 235
feet, more or less; thence westerly 85 feet, more or less, to
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
DeSCription for the adoption of right-of-way lines for Dublin
Boulevard between San Ramon Road and Regional Street.
Commenclng at the southeast corner of Parcel A of parcel Map
3253, Records of Alameda County, said point being on the north
line of Dublin Boulevard; thence so'uthwesterly along the north
line of Dublin Boulevard 19 feet, .more or less, to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing southwesterly along said
north line of Dublin Boulevard 240 feet, more or l~'ss, to the
· tan ent curve to the right hav ing'a radius of
beginning of.a g .... ~-- -~on- the arc of said curve 70.75
40.00 feet; t~ence nor~ne~ ~ ~ .. .
or l'ess, to a point on t~e east line
feet, more. _ . '-- -f a non-tangent curve, concave to t. he
ne De ink-n9 u .
Road and t. g ..... =--~ ~ or less thence leaving
north, having a raolus or ~u ~==~, ..... e ,
said east line of San Ramon Road and southeasterly along the
arc of said Curve to a point northerly 8.00 feet,'measured at
right angles to the north line of Dublin Boulevard; thence
northeasterly on a course parallel with said north line of
Dublin Boulevard 160 feet, more or less, to an angle point on
said north line; thence easterly 80 feet, more or less, to the-
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Beginning at the northeast corner of parcel B Of Parcel Map
2018, Records of Alameda County, said point'being on the
southerly line of Dublin Boulevard; thence southwesterly along
said south line of Dublin Boulevard 308.83 feet, more or less,
to an angle point in said south line; thence leaving said south
line of Dublin Boulevard northeasterly 309 feet,' more or less,
to a point On the east line of said Parcel B, said point being
southeasterly 12.00 feet from the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence
northerly along said east line of Parcel B a distance of 12.00
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Description for the adoption of right-of-waY lines for Dublin
Boulevard between Regional Street and Golden Gate Drive.
Commencing at the northeast corner of Parcel B of Parcel Map
4224, Records of Alameda County; thence southwesterly along the
northerly line of said Parcel B and the southerly line of
Dublin Blvd. a'distance of 185 feet, more or less, to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuifg along said southerly line
of Dubl in Boulevard 560 feet, more or less, to the beginning of
a curve to the left having a radius of 40.00 feet; thence along
the arc of said curve 62.83 feet through a central angle of 90~
00' 00" to a point on the east line of Regional Street and the
beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the east having a
radius of 40 feet, more or less; thence leaving said east line
and northerly along the arc of said curve to a point southerly
8.00 feet measured at right angles to said southerly llne of
Dublin Boulevard; thence northeasterly on a codr§e tangent to
the previous.curve 560 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
ORDINANCE NO. -88
AN ORDINANGE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ESTABLISHING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN DONLON WAY AND
GOLDEN GATE DRIVE
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution calling for a
public hearing to consider future right-of-way lines for Dublin Boulevard
between Donlon Way and Amador Plaza Road (Resolution No. 42-88) and set a
public hearing for April 11, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. to hear objections to the
establishment of said right-of-way lines; and
WHEREAS, said hearing was opened, the City Council provided
direction and continued the hearing to June 13, 1988; and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly given; and
WHEREAS, no protests were made either in writing or orally to the
establishment of said right-of-way lines; or
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council finds and ordains that:
Section 1. Right-of-way lines are hereby established for Dublin
Boulevard between Donlon Way and Golden Gate Drive, within the City of Dublin,
County of Alameda, State of California, as follows:
Ail additions to be in excess of the existing one-hundred foot
(100') adopted right-of-way:
as described in Exhibit 1 and all as more particularly shown on that certain
map entitled "MAP SHOWING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN
DONLON WAY AND GOLDEN GATE DRIVE," dated June, 1988, and filed in the office
of the City Clerk on June 9, 1988, which map is hereby adopted as a precise
plan of said right-of-way lines.
Section 2. The effect of said right-of-way lines shall be
governed by the provisions of Dublin Ordinance No. 44-87.
Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE. This
Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after
the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause
this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of
Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of
California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of , 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Description for the ~option of right-ofjway l~es f6r Dublin
Boulevard between Sa.. Ramon Road and Donlon Way,
Commencing at the northwest corner Of parcel B of Parcel Map
2834, Records of Alameda County, said point being on the south
line of Dublin Boulevard; thence northeasterly along said south
line 125 feet, more or less, ~to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence continuing northeasterly along said south line of Dublin
Boulevard 235 feet, more or less, to an angle point in said
south line; thence easterly alon. g said south line 67.87 feet,
more or lesS, to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right
having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence easterly along the arc of
said curve to a point southerly 12.'00 feet, measured at rlght
angles to the south line of Dublin Boulevard at the true point
of beginning; thence leaving the south line of Dublin Boulevard
southwesterly on a course parallel w~th and southerly 12.00
feet, measured at right angles to the south line of Dublin
Boulevard at the true point of beginning a distance of 235
feet, more or less; thence westerly 85 feet, more or less, to
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Description for the adoption of right-of-way lines for Dublin
Boulevard between San Ramon Road and Regional Street.
Commencing at the southeast corner of Parcel A of parcel Map
3253, Records of Alameda County, said point being on the north
line of Dublin Boulevard; thence southwesterly along the north
line of Dublin Boulevard 19 feet, lmore or les-~, to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing southwesterly.along said
north line of Dublin Boulevard 240 feet, more or less, to the
' a tan ent curve to the right having'a radius of
beginning of. g ....... ~--- the arc of said curve 70.75
t' thence nortne[z~
40.00 fee , -' ..... ~-t on the east line of San Ram.on
e or less,
feet., moor==_ ~^.~.{n~ n{ a non-tangent curve, concave to the
north, having a radius of 40 feet, more or less; thence leaving
said east line of San Ramon Road and southeasterly along the
arc of said Curve to a point northerly B.00 fee~,'measured at
right angles to the north tine of Dublin Boulevard; thence
northeasterly on a course parallel with said north line of
Dubl in Boulevard 160 feet, more or less, to an angle point on
said north line; thence easterly 80 feet, more or less, to the-
TRUE POIN~ OF BEGINNING.
Beginning at the northeast corner of Parcel B Of P'arcel Map
2018, Records of Alameda County, said point'being on the
southerly line of Dublin Boulevard; thence southwesterly along
said south line of Dublin Boulevard 308.83 feet, more or less,
to an angle POint in said south line; %hence leaving said south
line of Dublin Boulevard northeasterly 309 feet,' more or less,
to a point On the east line of said Parcel B, said point being
southeasterly 12.00 feet from the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence
northerly along said east line of Parcel B a distance of 12.00
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Description for the adoption of right-of-way lines for Dublin
Boulevard between Regional Street and Golden Gate Drive.
Commencing at the northeast corner of Parcel B of Parcel Map
4224, Records of Alameda County; thence southwesterly along the
northerly line of said Parcel B and the southerly line of
Dublin Blvd. a distance of 185 feet., more or less, to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said southerly line
of Dublin Boulevard 560 feet, more or less, to the beginning of
a curve to the left having a radius of 40.00 feet; thence along
the arc of said curve 62.83 feet through a central ~ngle of 90~
00' 00" to a point on the east line of Regional Street and the
beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the east having a
radius of 40 feet, more or less; thence leaving said east line
and northerly along the arc o~ said curve to a point southerly
8.00 feet measured at right angles to said southerly line of
Dublin Boulevard; thence northeasterly on a co~r~e tangent to
the previous.curve 560 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
RESOLUTION NO. -88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DEGLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CONCERNING
DUBLIN BOULEVARD REVISED PLAN LINE (DONLON WAX TO GOLDEN GATE DRIVE)
CITY OF DUBLIN
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as
amended together with the State's administrative guidelines for implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and City environmental
regulations, requires that certain projects be reviewed for environmental
impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and
WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted finding that the project,
as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et.
seq., a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared
by the Dublin Planning Department for this project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance and considered it at a public
hearing on March 7, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did review the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance and considered it at a public hearing on April 11,
1988 and June 13, 1988; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given as
legally required;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council finds
that the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared
and processed in accordance with State and Local Environmental Law and
Guideline Regulations, and that it is adequate and complete.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
cITY OF 'pU~l"4~ ...' , 'PA Mb :'
ENVI Fi O N~/~EP~ITAL;' A--S.S E s-'c P''''1 E hi T
(Pur:uant fo Public Resources Code Section 2]000 et' se~.)
Based on the project information submitted in Section 1 General Dater the Plannk~g Staff
will use Section 3, Initial Study, to determMe whether a Negstl.,e Declarbtion or an
Environmental ImFac?' R~?~rt is required....
SECTION 3. INITIAL STUDY - - -
to be completed by the PLANNING STAFF
"Name oF Pro[ecl or Applic=nh DUBLIN ~OULEVARD REVISED PLAN LiNE (Donlon Way to Amador
~ Plaza Road)
A.- ENVIRONMENTAL SEiTIN G - Descr~?icn of proiect site be{ore the proiectt including
' information on: topogrc?h~}; ~oil stability; plants and animcl.s; histcriccIt culturalt and
scenic aspects; existing structures; and use aF structures
Descr[ptlcn oF surrounam~ properties, lnc~uclng inFormcticn an: plants aha cnlmals;
historlc=It cultural, and scenic aspects; ~pe and intensify cf tcnd use; end sc:le or
d~velopmenL_ Surroundin~ properties ~e__ rer~il ~l~q . ~qrm,r~rq., ~s.
station, and other similar uses.
ENVIRONMENTAL h~PACTS - Factual ex?IcncHgns of c[l cr, s',vers excep,' "no" ere re- .
quired on attached sheets.
1.0 WATER
1.2 Cwound Water
'j.~ Dc~h to Water Tabl~
1.4 Dta~g~ and Qonn~l Form
$.$ J: Ioedln,g
WHI cont,:ruc:;en o[ thc pro[cc: al~cr
log;c
Will ~h~ pto~ct ofrcct Ih~ quoli~ or q~n~ o~
ground ~er
Will consl~ct[cn ;mpede the natural
or caus~ air,ration of stream cKanne~
~0
X
tis
I 1
I !
I I I
I .I I
I ! I
tn
A-5
®
federal ~landards?
Will sewage be ina.:le~luatoly accomm~",ated
Will grou~
~epa~t,
ad~acenl
2.0 Al~ .
- '
2.1 Air Pollution Will there be genemHon a~ 4;~ers;~
' by projecl relat~
pro~e~
2.2 W;~ A~era~on Will slmctme
~slruct;~ o~ w~ mo~e~ents?
~.0 ~A~
-
3.T S[~e S~bil~ Are Ihere
excess;ye
3.3 ~n~ligat;~ Will I~er~
3.4 S~sl~ence Is lhere r~ oF ~or gr~nd s~sld,~
wirh the ~oiec~?
Is there ri~ o[ ~ge or loss
3.5
3.6 ~lque[actI~ Will tRe pro~cc~ ~'~ or
' of ~;Is ;n sl~s
slrucli~ p~cllces~
3.8 Pem~b;l;~ Will Ihe perm~bility
: velopment of wells~
3.9 L~iR~ F~/ures Will ~y ~que geal~iml ~ea/mesbe
· or des~y~g
3.10 Mineral Re~ccs' . Are there
~]ue close Io ~e pro~ec~?
4.0 P~NTS AND ANIMALS
.
J4.l Plant and An;~l Spec;es Are there rare ~ ,~ang=r~ m~c~es
Are thee ~cies pre2nt whlch
suscept ~l~ to
4
Vegetative
be oF scr~Hfic interest?
Are th:re ~[~ trees or major
ho c~:~l}' nf~c~.te~ hy
:oF which w;ll deny r~ or hob;to'
Is there ~ston:inl d~vers;ty in
4.3
Dlvers;ty
as reflected in t~ nt,m~er O~
o~ plant ~ecic5 prc~cnt?
A-6
'.
5.0 FACILITIE~1 ANtD SERVICES
'
5.1 Educat;o~l Focillt;e~ Will projected enrollments odvcr~ly affect IRe ex-
o(~s, cM ~toff~ng needs?
as to imp~e the learning process?
Is ~e school Io~d such INaf Jl pre,nil a
~or o p~t;on oF the enrollment ~ terms oE travel t;me, ~
d~slance, or ~ety ~zards?
5.2 ~mmerc~al FaclJil~es Will I~ere be an Jnadeq~te ~pply of o~ access to ~
' ' co~rclal facilil[es ~or lhe project?
5.3 Llqurd Wasle DZ~I Are provh~ans [~ ~go ~c{~ ~te Fo(
th. need, o' Ih. proj.c, wit~u, exc,~ing q~li~
Will the project be ex~d lo nu~mnces a~
as~ated w~th ~sle~ler ~tm~t plants?
~stes generar~ by gte project?
5.6 S~mm Water Drai~ge Will ~orm ~ter dro~g~ be i~te to pre~t ~
do~slr~n Jl~Ing and to ~et F~emJ 5~te a~
loml ~o~ords?
5.7 Pol~ce Will ~ project's oddtt;o~l ~Jot;~, facilities,
~ o~her ~l~es g~n~te an ~n~ ~n poJ~ce ~rv~ce. ~
or ~te a pol~ce
5.8 Fire Will lhe project's addir;onal Fellahin, ~acJlit~es,
~ oth~ [ea~es gen~afe an ;n~ ~n fire services ~
or cr~le o ~re hazard?
5.9 Recr~f;~ Will t~e project ~ve Jnad~te [acNhies lo meet ~
I~e re~t;o~J needs of the res;d~H? . ,
5.10 Cultural FacJl;l~es W;II cul~rol fac~l;r[es ~e ~;loble ~o ~ project
res;~eflts?
6.0 TaNSPOiTAT1ON
'
of ~ a~ve m~clty? If not, ~11 r~ ~ffic gen:
j emt~ by l~le ~oject muse the o~acent ~ds Io
r~c~ ~ exce~
. Are the oth~ ~n~tat;~ facilit;es ~;~ ~rve Ihe
project J~d~te to occo~at~ th~ ~oject*s
. travel
6.2 'Circurat[on ~fl;ct/ :WZIt des;ga of th~ pruject m c~;t~s ~ the 5mrou~- X
~ng ar~ Jfl~ accidents d~ ~ c~/at;~
6.3 R~d ~fe~ and Des;gn Will project r~s~dents end us~s be e~o~d to in~sed
occ;dcfll ri~s d~ Io r~y o~ s~rcct des]~ ~ Joc~ ~
°f ~aff;c c~'r°ls?
. ·
7.1 Odors. Will rko project be ~xposed ~o or generate any ;nrense
7.2 '~o~ing a~ Densi~ Will Ihe res;dents and users be exp~ to ~o~;ng ~ ~
7.3 Nut ..... Willt~eproicctbeexpo~dto~g .... lc factorst~t [~
~y be consJder~ os nu~mnces?
7.4 5l~ucl~ol ~e~ Will design and proposed const~ct~m~ techn~q~s foil
to meet state a~ local buHdlng c~es?
8.1 Noise Levers Will the project bo cxpo~4 tn ~r Ocn~ote advcr~ ~ ,temporary
noise levels ?
..
9.0 COMMUI'41TY CHARACTE~
9.1 ~mm~;~ Or~nrzmi~ ?/ill the project d;~up~ an e~;~Hna ~ o~
9.2 ~mo~enel~ a~ Diver~i~ Will the Proiect c~nge Ibc c~mcler of IRo
10.0 VISUALG~LITY
10. ! View~ Will res;denis of the s~ro~;no ot~ b~ od~er~ely
1.0 HISTORIC AND CULTL~L
I 1. ] Hislorlc ~nd Cuhural Will I~ project in.lye Ihe destruction ~ alter-
~e~ces at~ oF a h~stoe~c re.urea?
~ atmospheric elemenls r~ a/c hal ;n c~roctcr
~n ar~lo~;cal re~ce ~ i~ setting?
-
o~ the s~v;cc utility core.ny?
13~2 Ph~s;coJ Thr~l. Will Ibc project ~ the ~rround;n9 ar~ ~care a
~[ ~n~ecurily and physical Ihr~t a~n~ the residents
no'se, o~r, or ~jrface nnd grand ~tcr pollution
13.4 V,'otcr~ys W~:I thc pmicct of Fccl on ex;st;nD ~lct~y lhtouDh
ch:rgcs, loss of vls~l q~lity ~ oth,:r land use
A-8
i I I
Land Use Will the project involve the X - ! ! !
afteration of existing site i- ! !
I I. I
~ improvements that wou].d ad-
versely affect the u-se of the
property? I, ! ~ !
.. " ~ I ! !
I
.1
Other En¥;,o,nmenial Co~,onenl*s':
! II *.'
~ '1 I
I I !
I ! !-
I I I
· C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
(1) Does the proiect h~ve the potential to degrade the
queli~ of the environment, substantially reduce
hcotra, oF o fish or
the '" - wildlife species, c:use a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sus['alning levels, threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal communib/, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or end'angered plant or animal
or eliminate impor~nt examples of the major periods
or California history cr prehistory?
(2)
(3)
Does
the proiect hsve ~he potentic~ to achieve short-
term, ~o the disadvantage oF ~ons-term, envlronmentcl
.goals? ·
Does the project have impacts which are indivJduaJly
· limited but cumulateively considerable? (A project
may jmpact on two or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is relatively small, b'ut
where the effect o~ the total 0t: those impacts-on the
environment is slgniFic=nt.)
(4)
Does the project, have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
NO, NO -YF_SO%xV~iC~iN
'7,
×,
×
D. MITIGATION MEASURES - Discussion oF the ways to mltlga~e the slgn[f[cant effects
identified, iF any:
E. DETERMINATION - On the basis oF this initial evaluation:
The' City oF D~blih finds that there will not be any'significant effect. The par-
ticular characterlst[cs oF this project and the mltkgatian .measures incorporated into
the design of the project pro'zlde .~he Factual b,'=sls for the Finding. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION !S REQUIRED.
The City oF ]2L~blir~ Finds that the proposed project MAy have a s[gnit:icant eFFect
on the environment. AN ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED**
Signa'ture and date:
Name and title:
**NOTF: Where a project ;s rev;sed ;n response to an Inlt;al Study so !ha.~ po,~e:~:;al adverse
eFFects are m;t[gated to a po;nt where no s;gn;flc~mt env;ronmental effects would occur, c
rev;sed In;rial S.~ud7 ;v;ll be prepared an'-d a Negat[ve Declaration w;li be requ'.'red i~s'eod oF
an EIR.
A--1/'~'
Development Services
P.O. Box 2,~4~
Dublin, CA 94568
CITY OF DUBLIN
Plannin~Zoning 829-4916
Building & Safety 829-(~22
EngmeerinoJPublic Works 829-4927
NEGATIVE DECLAP~ATION FOR:
DUBLIN BOULEVARD RE~JISED PLAN LINE
(Donlon Way to Amador Plaza Road)
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.)
LOCATION'
PROPONENT:
DESCRIPTION:
FINDINGS'
INITIAL STUDY:
MITIGATION MEASURES'
PREPAtL~TION:
Revision of Plan Line for Dublin Boulevard between
Donlon Way and Amador Plaza Road
City of Dublin
A proposal to revise the plan line of Dublin Boulevard
to consider widening the road between Donlon Way and
Amador Plaza Road.
The project will not have a significant effe'ct on the
environment.
The initial study is available with a brief discussion
of the following environmental components:
1) Landscaping
2) Parking
New or replacement of landscaping; restriping of
parking spaces.
This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of
Dublin Planning Staff, (415) 829-4916.
SIGNATURE:
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
DATE:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-012
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COmmISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CONCERNING DUBLIN BOULEV~ REVISED PLAN LINE
(DONLON WAX TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD)
CITY OF DUBLIN
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as
amended together with the State's administrative guidelines for implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and City environmental
regulations, requires that certain projects be reviewed for environmental
impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and
WHEREAS, an initial'study was conducted finding that the project,
as proposed, woUld not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WME~, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et.
seq., a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been
prepared by the Dublin Planning Department for this project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance and considered it at a public
hearing on March 7, 1988; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given as
legally required; and'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission
recommends that the City Council find that the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance has been prepared and processed in accordance with
State and Local Environmental Law and Guideline Regulations, and that it is
adequate and complete.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1988.
AYES: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Mack, Tempel, and Zika
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
Planning Direct~
/
Plann{~g Commzs~n Chairperson
RESOLUTION NO. 88-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMAMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISH PLAN LINE
FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION FROM DONLON WAY TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD
WHEREAS, the Dublin Downtown Plan was adopted by the City Council
of the City of Dublin by Resolution No. 55-87 on July 21, 1987; and
WHEREAS, the Downto'~n Plan identified the need to study the plan
line along Dublin Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the 1987-1988 Capital Improvement Program adopted by the
City Council by Resolution No. 44-87 on June 23, 1987, authorized a plan line
study for Dublin Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on
March 7, 1988; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significanc~ has been recommended for adoption
(Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-012) for this project, as it will have
no significant effect on the environment; and
WI{EtLEAS, the Staff report was submitted recommending that the
Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said
reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set'forth; and
WHERF-~S, the plan line is appropriate for the subject property in
terms of being compatible to existing and proposed land uses and conforming to
the underlying land use designation and it will not overburden public
sel-vices: and
WHEREAS, the plan line will not have a substantial adverse effect
on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or
be injurious to property or public improvement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission
does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the plan line as described
on the attached Exhibit A dated March 2, 1988.
BE IT FURTHER tLESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission
recommends that the City Council consider relocating the bus turnout shown
located on the south side of Dublin Boulevard one block to the west between
Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1988.
AYES: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Mack, Tempel, and Zika
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Planning Commi%~s-i~ Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
~y Corallo, 6499 Scarlett Court, Valley Boathouse, stated she wou]
to co. ~cttvely work with the City and other property owners. She s~ she
has a :ar plan with her bankers and would like to get on with t )roJect.
She su looking at the potential for making allowances fo! .on-
conforming s such as Miracle Auto Painting.
Cm. Burnham
how long would it be before the
Mr. Thompson said
18 months, if not,
an assessment district was
years approximately.
There being no further
Cm. Barnes cl
On motion by Cm. Zika,
Resolution was adopted r
Negative Declaration of
extension plan line.
be completed.
apProximately 1 year to
the public hearing.
d by Cm. Bur and by a vote of 5-0 a
ing thai City Council adopt a Mitigated
.gnificance concerning Dublin Boulevard
RES(
RECOMMENDING THAT TIlE CITY ICIL
OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNI!
PLAN LINE ROAD TO
88 - 010
A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION
PAGIFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)
On motion by Cm. Mack ~onded by Cm. Zika
was adopted recomme~ the City Council
Boulevard extensi( from Dougherty Road to Southern
a vote of 5-0 a Resolution
[an line for Dublin
~ific Right-of-Way.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-011 -
THE CiTY COUNCIL ESTABLISH PLAN LINE FOR D~IN BOULEVA1LD
by Cm. Mack, seconded by Cm. Tempel, and by a vote of 5.~S. taff was
to prepare a Zoning Ordinance which would provide a. con.fo.n~g~ status
,roperties rendered non-conforming solely because of condemnation
,erty.
SUBJECT:
Dublin Boulevard extension Plan Line
between Don!on Way and Amador Plaza Road
to consider establishment of plan lines
for a portion of the Dublin Boulevard
extension.
Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report.
Mr. Tong stated a plan line was established for Dublin Boulevard between
Donlon Way and Amador Plaza Road in 1984. Since the City Council adopted the
plan line, other studies and projects have revealed that future traffic on
Dublin Boulevard will result in unacceptable traffic volumns at peak hours. A
revised plan line which would widen Dublin Boulevard and provide additional
left and right turn lanes is proposed.
Regular Meeting
PCM- 8 - 42
March 7, 1988
Mr. Thompson stated the need for revising the plan line was first apparent
when conducting the traffic study of the build-out of downtown Dublin and the
traffic impact study for the Hansen Hill Ranch project. These studies
revealed that the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and San Ramon Road would
experience future congestion during peak hours with existing plan line
configuration. The traffic impact study of the Hansen Hill Ranch recommended
revised lane configurations for the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and San
Ramon Road that would also accommodate additional dwelling units in the
western hill area of Dublin. The build-out figures include allowances for BART
station traffic.
Mr. Thompson stated the major differnce between the previous plan line and the
revised plan line is the provision of double right-turn lanes on the eastbound
approach of Dublin Boulevard to San Ramon Road and triple left-turn lanes on
the westbound approach lanes of Dublin Boulevard to San Ramon Road. There
would also be four westbound lanes on Dublin Boulevard at the westbound
approach to Regional Street.
The provision of double right-turn lanes on the eastbound approach at San
Ramon Road would require the acquisition of right-of-way from the Shell
service station on the southwest corner of the intersection.
The provision of triple left-turn lanes plus a through lane and a right-turn
lane on the westbound approach at San Ramon Road would require the acquisition
of right-of-way west of San Ramon Road on the north side of Dublin Boulevard
for approximately.400 feet. Also, acquisition of right-of-way above and
beyond that which is depicted on the existing Dublin Plan Line would be
required on the north side of Dublin Boulevard between San Ramon Road and
Regional Street. Between Regional Street and Golden Gate Drive, the revised
plan line proposes the same right-of-way requirement on the north side of
Dublin Boulevard as the existing Plan Line. On the south side of Dublin
Boulevard, the revised plan line would require the acquisition of additional
right-of-way between San Ramon Road and approximately 180 feet west of
Regional Steer and again between Regional Street and Golden Gate Drive,
whereas the existing Dublin Plan Line would retain the existing right-of-way.
Although additional right-of-way is required for the revised plan line, no
structures would have to be demolished.
Mr. Thompson stated that although triple left-turn lanes are an unusual
configuration, in order to assess the potential for triple left-turn lanes to
operate satisfactorily the destination of vehicles currently executing the
westbound to southbound left turn was observed. Destinations were fairly
evenly split between westbound on 1-580, eastbound on 1-580, and southbound on
Foothill Road into Pleasanton. It should therefore be feasible to erect
overhead signs above each of the triple left-turn lanes indicating that
vehicles desiring to arrive at one of these three destinations should be in a
specific left-turn lane. It is Staff's opinion that signing would be
necessary for the smooth operation of the triple left-turn lanes.
Mr. Thompson continued by saying the revised plan line also includes two bus
turnouts. One is located about 327 feet east of the centerline of Dublin
Boulevard/Golden Gate Drive intersection on the south side of the street (in
front of Crown Chevrolet). The other is located about 170 feet west of the
centerline of the same intersection on the north side of the street (in front
of Toys R Us).
Regular Meeting
PCM-8-43
March 7, 1988
Mr. Thompson stated landscaping and parking impacts from the revised plan line
will be minimal and the preliminary estimated costs for right-of-way
acquisition, design and construction of the road widening is $1.7 million.
Cm. Zika asked if the islands at San Ramon Road and Dublin Boulevard would be
removed.
Mr. Thompson stated that they would be removed.
Cm. Tempel expressed concern with lack of expansion for Dublin Boulevard
widening.
Cm. Burnham asked why the bus turnouts had to be located at the sites
suggested.
Mr. Thompson stated that the existing bus transfer sites were located at these
locations and they encouraged people to cross at a signaled intersection.
Pat Costello, Crown Chevrolet express concern with the location of the bus
turnout and the widening of Dublin BoulePard. He proposes to loose
approximately 50-60 display spaces for cars and the buses will block display
of cars. He is concerned with people waiting for the bus sitting on cars. He
suggested moving the bus turnout to the east to the Orchard Shopping Center
parking lot.
Cm. Barnes stated she would like to se~ the bus turnout moved near the Orchard
Shopping Center parking lot.
Cm. Barnes closed the public hearing.
Cm. Zika questioned whether it would create a problem moving the bus turnout
to the Orchard Shopping Center instead of Crown Chevrolet.
Michelle DeRobertis, TJKM, saw no major problem with moving the bus turnout
site.
Mr. Thompson stated a recommendation could be made to the City Council to
change the location of the bus turnout.
On motion by Cm. Burnham, seconded by Cm. Zika and by a vote of 5-0, a
Resolution was adopted recommending that the City Council adopt a Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance concerning Dublin Boulevard revised
plan line.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 012
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CONCERNING DUBLIN BOULEVARD REVISED PLAN LINE
(DONLON WAY TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD)
On motion by Cm. Zika, seconded by Cm. Mack, and by a vote of 5-0 with an
amendment to consider moving the bus turnout 1 block west, a Resolution was
adopted recommending the City Council establish plan line for Dublin Boulevard
extension from Donlon Way to Amador Plaza Road.
Regular Meeting
PCM-8-44
March 7, 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 013
RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISH PLAN LINE FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD
EXTENSION FROM DONLON WAY TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD
BUSINESS OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Cm. lika inquired about the slurry seal of Peppertree Road.
Mr. stated that Staff will try to include Pe~
slurry gram.
in the annual
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Tong advised
the Amador Auto
meeting.
~nd reading of the
sign appeal would
Planned Development Rezone and
heard at the upcoming City Council
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERN
Cm. Burnham questioned if the __.xin front of Oshman's Sporting Goods on
Amador Valley Boulevard w ~/~ Be lan~ped.
~r. Thompson stated that/~ec! [on of g.maahoX[ Valley Boulevard was scheduled to
be done when the signayintersection was ~e.
Cm. Tempel was extre~ly concerned with the ~affic related problems
throughout the City ~ ..~
Cm. Barnes was~ce?ed with the transformT[ on ~?herty Road.
Mr. Thompson ytated ~hat the Army was actually staring with regard to the
removal o f~e transformer. ~
Cm. Zika,~as concerned with the number of er quests for v~iance to the Sign
Ordinan~. _ ~
oAg stated that the Applicant h. aLa . t3o variance and
tha. t/~f the Zoning Ad~. inistrator and ~omm.i~sion dec,ions are upheld,
tha~would indicate that the Sign Ordinance is working._. .~
Cm. Barnes reminded those Commissioners that were attending the~lanning
Institute to meet at the designated time of 5:15 a.m.
Regular Meeting
PCM-8-45
March 7, 1988