HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 72-15 Parks & Rec Master Plan RESOLUTION NO. 72 - 15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ADOPTING THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN (2015)
WHEREAS, in July 1994 the City Council adopted the Parks & Recreation Master Plan which
established goals, long-term policies and standards to guide the City of Dublin in the acquisition,
development and management of Dublin's park and recreation facilities; .and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to prepare an update to the Master Plan every five to ten years to
address changing conditions in the development of the City; and
WHEREAS, the most recent updates to the Master Plan were adopted by the City Council on
March 16, 2004 and August 1, 2006; and
WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed development proposals, population projections and their
impact on park and recreation facility demand; and
WHEREAS, the Master Plan reflects the most current planning and population data available
to the City; and
WHEREAS, the Master Plan identifies a future deficit of parks and facilities, and potential sites
and alternatives to address that deficit; and
WHEREAS, an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration from the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan (2004) has been prepared and processed for the Master Plan (2015) in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State CEQA Guidelines and City
Environmental Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Community Services Commission and Heritage and Cultural Arts
Commission did review and consider the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2015) at a special joint-
meeting on April 20, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did review and consider the Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Update at a public hearing on May 5, 2015; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearings was given in all respects as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby adopt the Parks and Recreation Master Plan - 2015 (Exhibit A).
Page 1 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Biddle, Gupta, Hart, Wehrenberg, and Mayor Haubert
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
i--074 tviiAt
Mayor
ATTEST:
avy ;<!--
City Clerk
Reso No. 72-15, Adopted 5-19-15, Item 6.3 Page 2 of 2
r S ,.- . v'
,\ e `
. = ;"A- . .... k . r;
. •3...o- •,.3 :'c- - - _
4,
.
s1
...
k
1 "�• 1 A,
r
s e:,
.'mad°+t ,0 ' t� ;t%'' _ , :•
iratmitio;ir
....„„ _ _-_,:amilti.,_ iL _ ,..- iy/ 1.1,7'
lc) mil— — 182
1
City of Dublin
CALIFORNIA
Dublin
biatil
i edcaC j
I 1.
2011
PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
20 15
0��/- DU�IJ�
19 dal I-I I.* 82
City of Dublin
CALIFORNIA
Dublin
blksi
'I I,
2011
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
2015
City Council
David Haubert—Mayor
Abe Gupta—Vice Mayor
Don Biddle— Councilmember
Kevin Hart— Councilmember
Doreen Wehrenberg— Councilmember
Parks and Community Services Commission
Anthony Totaro—Chairperson
Mona Lisa Ballesteros —Vice Chairperson
Philip Tucker—Commissioner
Janine Thalblum— Commissioner
Joseph Giannini—Commissioner
Alicia Tran —Student Commissioner
This page intentionally left blank.
City of Dublin
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
20I5
CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Overview: Parks, Environment and Image 1
The Master Plan 2
Regional Location 2
Planning Process 4
Organization 5
Chapter I: Background and Analysis 7
The Setting 7
Population, Demographics and Growth 9
Facilities Evaluation and Demand 11
Park and Recreation Facility Needs and Standards 13
Park and Recreation Facility Inventory 21
Future Parks and Recreation Facility Development 24
Chapter 2: Parks and Recreation Facility Standard 33
Introduction 33
Active Community Park Standards 35
Natural Community Park Standards 37
Neighborhood Park Standards 38
Neighborhood Square Standards 39
Downtown Plaza Standards 40
Cultural Arts Center Standards 41
Trail Standards 42
Contents 41 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 iii
Chapter 3: Goals and Policies 45
Park System 45
Linear Parks and Trails 47
Park Acquisition and Development 48
Park Design, Maintenance,and Operations 49
Chapter 4: Implementation 5 I
Overview 51
Funding Mechanisms 51
Cost of Development and Operations 52
List of Figures 55
List of Tables 57
iv City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 Contents
THE MASTER PLAN
The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is to establish goals, standards, guiding policies, and
action programs to guide the City of Dublin in the acquisition, development and management (operations and
maintenance) of Dublin's park and recreation facilities through the ultimate build-out of the City in accordance
with the General Plan.
The Master Plan must evolve to respond to the City's growth and changing demographics.Thus, it contains both
specific standards that guide the City's actions, as well as provide clear direction to other agencies and private
developers regarding the "rules" under which Dublin is developing, maintaining, and operating its park and
recreation system. Policies and programs are included that are flexible enough to accommodate new opportunities
and shifts in priorities.
The Dublin climate allows for almost year-round use of the park facilities. That fact, combined with the
active, recreation-oriented lifestyle of the population, places a significant emphasis on the provision of high-
quality amenities and ample recreational opportunities for the community. Over the past five years, the City has
experienced noticeable growth in sports and fitness activities taking place in parks and facilities. Additionally,
sports seasons are becoming longer and new sports are becoming popular with residents. Nationally recognized
standards for park and recreation facilities establish thresholds that often do not reflect the recreational demands
of a specific community. The standards and policies set forth in this Master Plan,while recognizing national and
peer community standards,are unique to Dublin.
This Master Plan is a reflection of the City of Dublin's commitment to ensuring a high quality of life for the
community.
REGIONAL LOCATION
Since the City's incorporation in February 1982,the City's population has increased as both residents and businesses
found the benefits of calling Dublin home. Dublin is located approximately 350 miles north of Los Angeles and 35
miles east of San Francisco. Dublin is 14.59 square miles in area. Dublin is located within the Tri-Valley region of
the Bay Area,and is generally bounded by the City of San Ramon to the north,unincorporated Castro Valley to the
west, the City of Pleasanton to the south, and the City of Livermore to the east.
Because of this strategic location at the intersection of two major freeways (Interstates 580 and 680),the City is a
great place to live,work,and play.Dublin has become known for its high quality of lift in the areas of public safety,
excellent educational opportunities, and abundant and diverse housing opportunities. Dublin's new residents
include more families with children,more young active adults, and an expanding senior population—all of whom
arc seeking quality recreational opportunities.
Open space planning by other regional agencies plays a role in Dublin's planning as well. The East Bay Regional
Park District (EBRPD) is actively seeking to complete a segment of the ridgeline trail corridor through Western
Dublin. They have also developed "Guidelines for Open Space Planning and Management," which could have a
significant influence on the provision and design of open space in the Dublin area.The Tri-Valley Trails Council and
adjacent communities support the development of a regional network of trails and bikeways utilizing the railroad
right-of-way,flood control channels and existing bikeways throughout the area's communities.Development plans
in San Ramon and Contra Costa County to the north and Livermore to the east and Pleasanton to the south are
proposing potential open space and trail connections, all of which could provide opportunities to link the various
communities with a vast recreational network.
2 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 '' Introduction
Santa ; Si.Helena 128 ■ COUNTY
ACRAMENTr
dt Rosa 128
__ Dixon \ Elk
Park r Grove SACRAMENTO
Sebastopol SONOMA COUNTY COUNTY
COUNTY
I
Rohner! \ ® ®
\ Vacaville —
`, __ 113
1111!\ Napa SOLANO 5
\C0101i
1:05 Sonoma Fairfield COUNTY 16B 104
YY Petaluma ' , `- Suisun City Gait
116 22C 1 �-
\-� ® r ®
`` s, Rio
x di f ® r~
ista ri
37 ;Vallejo
0
® Lodi
MARIN Novato AS Benicia ,, 160 ■
O COUNTY Vie` I�nn
88 en:UI e4O O "�
Martinez , /
Antioch \A /
8B' Concord '] Stockton a
Lafayette CONTRA O
Walnut Creek COSTA ; SAN
1 4 Orinda COUNTY 4 JOAQUIN
COUNTY
aB, 13 Danville
Lathrop
�, Oakland.) -- r
�1 _ San Ramon I V 580 Tracy 1�fa 101 i U
Hayward Pleasanton Livermore ,
fil gpJ
ALAMEDA 132
Milibn Union COUNTY
280 City
Nillsboroug ♦ ■
/�4 , 04 Newark Fremont
'''.\\Crill II i- ---_--<
di 82{
'Palo Alto
K
f[1�7,, 680
SAN MATEO 1 280 L'�'4► �r �'N
COUNTY
STANISLAUS
_ �, ( COUNTY
lCupertino ` ,
67 62 San Jose
A Saratoga 85 SANTA
9 CLARA ,
LOS COUNTY \
i 236 _
Morgan
c]...
-N-
.-0
Hill
O
Scotts \
o �` ��
a Valley SANTA CRUZ
n COUNTY .\
Santa Capitols 152 152
2 Cruz r Gilroy 152
1
. )�;. x.129 iiiriL 25 156
Hollister
\` 156
\ SAN BENITO
� COUNTY
Figure 1 I Regional Location Map
Introduction is City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 3
PLANNING PROCESS
1994 to Present
Well-designed and sufficient parks and facilities convey a positive image of the quality of life in any community.As
the City of Dublin continues to develop,it is the goal to acquire and develop new parks,open space and recreation
facilities. In addition, the City continues to upgrade and maintain existing facilities and provide innovative and
diversified recreation programs.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was originally prepared by David Gates and Associates and adopted by the
City Council in July 1994.The information for the Master Plan was gathered through a series of public meetings,
interviews, site visits,joint study sessions, and the careful review of local agency policy documents. Additionally,
there was a Steering Committee composed of representatives of City Commissions and special recreation interest
groups such as little league(baseball),soccer, and senior groups. Through meetings with the Steering Committee,
Staff and the consultants identified and evaluated various recreation standards and park site alternatives.Through
a process of demand assessment,park land requirement allocation verification,and alternative site testing,the final
Park and Recreation Master Plan emerged.
In March 2004, the Master Plan was updated with the goal of revisiting the assumptions that were used in the
original document to ensure that they were still realistic and that adequate park and recreation facilities were
available for the current and future population of the City. This update took into account updated population
projections and the most current land use assumptions for ultimate build-out in accordance with the General Plan.
The March 2004 update anticipated a 5.3-acre parkland deficit at build-out of the City and identified the need to
select and designate sites for new parks to alleviate the deficit. Furthermore, the Update recommended pursuing
opportunities to expand the Dublin Heritage Center around the City's Donlon Way historic core.
In August 2006,the Dublin Village Historic Area Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council,which amended
the land use designation of five parcels in the area for the purposes of expanding the Heritage Center into a
full Historic Park. Shortly thereafter, the City Council adopted the Historic Park Master Plan, which served to
enhance this key area and also alleviate the park deficit. In 2006,the City Council adopted an update to the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan that reflected the addition of this parkland to the City's inventory.
Predicting Dublin's Future Population
The California Department of Finance's 2015 population data estimated that Dublin had approximately 51,784
residents (excluding group quarters). The goals, policies and standards adopted in the 2006 Master Plan Update
assumed a build-out population of 59,900.Since 2006, two key population factors changed,which resulted in the
expected population of Dublin at build-out of the General Plan to increase to 75,000. This change in population
forecasting is due to:
1. The average density per unit used to calculate the population was amended in the General Plan. Instead of
different population figures assumed for different residential densities, the City now uses a blended figure of
2.7 persons per residential unit, which was based on the 2010 Census figures that showed this as Dublin's
average household size. The means of calculating persons per household contributed to population forecasts
that were higher than previously predicted.
2. Two key land use amendments were approved in recent years that increased the number of residential units
expected to be built in Dublin.In 2013,the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan was approved,which added up to
1,995 future residential units to the City's build-out number. In 2014,the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan
was amended to increase the development cap in the Downtown by 1,200 units to a total of 2,500 units.
4 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 44 Introduction
Combined,these two changes added the potential for 3,195 additional residential units to be constructed in
Dublin,which increased the projected population at General Plan build-out.
Based on the City's current standards,the anticipated population of 75,000 creates a 11.5-acre parkland deficit at
build-out and creates a potential need for 40,000 square feet of additional community facility space.
Measuring Current Park and Facility Needs
Over the past five years the City has undertaken several community needs assessments related to parks, facilities
and programs. The input from those assessments has been used to develop the new Parks and Recreation Master
Plan.In 2008 the City engaged over 1,000 residents in several surveys and focus groups to develop the Department
Strategic Plan.This included a statistically valid mail-in survey of park and facility interests and priorities.In 2012
the City undertook a Marketing and Communic ations Study and conducted a statistically valid phone-survey
of over 400 residents related to recreation and cultural program needs and marketing preferences. In 2013 the
City engaged over 800 residents in a web-based survey identifying preferred park amenities for the Iron Horse
Nature Park Master Plan,which helped inform the City of the more passive and un-programmed activities desired
by residents. Most recently the City engaged over 1,000 residents in a community survey on active and passive
recreation needs as part of the development of the Dublin Crossing Community Park Master Plan.
ORGANIZATION
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan is divided into four chapters:
I. Background and Analysis.This chapter summarizes the analysis of background information and projections
used in developing the Plan.
II. Parks and Recreation Facility Standards.This chapter provides specific standards and criteria for Dublin's
parks and recreation facilities.
III. Goals and Policies.This chapter identified goals,guiding,policies,and action programs to implement the
Master Plan.
IV. Implementation. This chapter describes the funding sources and regulatory tools available to make the
plan a reality.
Introduction i,G City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 5
This page intentionally left blank.
City of Dublin
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
2015
Chapter 1
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
THE SETTING
Regional Context
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan study area is coterminous with the city limits. Future growth in Dublin
will occur primarily in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area,the Dublin Crossing Planning Area,the Downtown
Specific Plan Area, and with limited growth in the Primary Planning Area,which lies to the west. Consequently,
the unification of the proposed outlying sections of the community with the existing core, and to each other, is a
primary goal of the Master Plan.
The East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) has overlapping jurisdiction in the Master Plan Study Area.
EBRPD is striving to provide regional trail connections with adequate corridor widths and buffers. They value the
preservation of the natural and rural essence of the undeveloped portions of the community. These natural open
spaces are an important part of Dublin's character.
There are also opportunities to make trail connections with the adjacent communities ofSan Ramon and Pleasanton
and with other trail facilities operated by the East Bay Regional Park District and the Livermore Area Recreation
and Park District.Trails that follow creek and drainage channels may provide opportunities for new connections.
Along the Union Pacific/Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, the Iron Horse Trail has been developed as a
regional facility,linking cities in Contra Costa County,Dublin,the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station,and beyond
into Pleasanton.
Existing Resources
There are numerous creeks and drainage channels throughout the Study Area which provide opportunities to
develop creek-side trails. The continuous connections these creeks and drainage channels provide are especially
critical in the developed areas of Dublin. In 2013, the City acquired 12.5 acres of land adjacent to South San
Ramon Creek and the Iron Horse Trail between Amador Valley Boulevard and the city limit with San Ramon to
the north.This land will be used for the future"Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space,"a community park with
a focus on creating passive recreational amenities and restoring open space areas to natural conditions.
Currently there are four major pedestrian/bikeways in Dublin: along San Ramon Road, along Dougherty Road,
the regional-serving Iron Horse Trail,the Alamo Creek Trail,and Alamo Canal.These paths are separated from the
Background and Analysis ,, City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan — May 201.5 7
street and are well utilized by the local community.Additional open space trails include the Martin Canyon Creek
Trail and the Tassajara Creek Trail. These paths and trails are the foundation for Dublin's separated pedestrian and
bicycle network.
The Dublin Civic Center complex includes the City Hall, the Police Facility, and a plaza area to accommodate
outdoor festivals and civic events, and an adjacent Public Safety Complex partially serving Alameda County
Fire.A new Library was completed in Spring 2003,which provides additional community meeting and function
spaces and completes the Civic Center Complex. The adjacent Sports Grounds contain many of the competitive
sports fields in Dublin. Additional sports fields are at Emerald Glen Park, Fallon Sports Park, and the City has
worked cooperatively with the Dublin Unified School District to upgrade existing school yard facilities to provide
additional sports fields for the community.
The historical heritage of the Dublin community has been preserved by the City with help from the Dublin
Historical Preservation Association and the Amador/Livermore Valley Historical Society.The Old Murray School
House and St. Raymond's Church, which were acquired by the City, are located adjacent to the Dublin Pioneer
Cemetery.This historic site,which is located near Downtown Dublin,has provided the community with a special
place to preserve and celebrate local history. The recently-expanded Historic Park complements the existing
Heritage Center by providing additional facilities for the programs that already exist there and by providing
additional parkland for the community.
The Downtown Dublin Specific Plan, adopted by the City Council in 2011, aims to facilitate the creation of a
vibrant and dynamic commercial and mixed-use center that provides a wide array of opportunities for shopping,
services, dining, working,living and entertainment in a pedestrian-friendly and aesthetically pleasing setting that
attracts both local and regional residents.. The size and location of Downtown Dublin offers the opportunity to
create accessible public spaces and a central gathering place for civic celebrations and activities that take place in
the Downtown. The Specific Plan focuses on integrating design features such as monuments, signage and public
plazas with improvements to landscaping,green spaces and wider sidewalks to unify the predominantly retail area.
Within the existing city limits, the potential for further expansion of park and recreation facilities is extremely
limited.The 1986 Parks Master Plan Report and subsequent 1990 Sports Ground Master Plan Report and School
Facilities Plan illustrate maximum utilization of existing park sites and joint use of several school play yards to
meet the current demands of the community. Thus, the weight of providing park land and facilities for the future
growth falls mainly upon the undeveloped west and east portions of the community,although there may be some
opportunities in the primary planning area as properties redevelop.
The eastern portion of Dublin is characterized by rolling grass lands divided into three canyons. In this area, the
gentle topography and proposed roadway system have been able to accommodate larger Community Park facilities
such as Emerald Glen Park and Fallon Sports Park as well as several smaller Neighborhood Parks. The creeks and
swales have provided natural opportunities for open space linkages between parks.
The western portion of Dublin is characterized by steep topography and a dense cover of oak woodland.The steep
terrain limits the opportunities for large active community recreation facilities, although have been opportunities
to locate and develop Neighborhood Parks such as Schaefer Ranch. The natural features of the area warrant
protection through the development of passive recreation areas and regional trail connections such as to Martin
Canyon Creek.
Currently, the City of Dublin's Subdivision Ordinance requires the dedication of 5-acres of park land for every
1,000 persons. This standard has been retained and is further defined in this Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
8 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 Background and Analysis
POPULATION, DEMOGRAPHICS AND GROWTH
The City of Dublin, along with the entire Tri-Valley region, continues to experience population growth. From a
population of approximately 14,300 in 1982, the City of Dublin has grown to a resident population of 51,784 in
2015 (without group quarters) per the California Department of Finance. At full build-out of the City in 2040
as envisioned by the General Plan, the resident population is expected to be 75,000.The population growth since
1982 can be attributed to the annexation and development of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area,the Schaefer
Ranch General Plan Area, new development planned for in the Dublin Crossing Planning Area, additional
development planned in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area,and build-out of approved developments and
infill growth including residential areas around the City's two BART stations.This projected increase over the next
twenty-five years will create demand for additional recreational facilities and programs.
Population Structure
According to the 2010 U.S. Census, Dublin's largest population segment is represented by adults aged 25 to 44.
This group statistically representing over 38%of the City's population in any given year and includes young adults
and families as well as single adults and couples without children.Individuals and families in this category have the
most diverse needs in terms of recreation facilities and available programs based on age and interest. Statistically,
it is expected that dual-employed families with children will continue the nationwide growth trend in the Dublin
area. This growth will impact the need for increased day care services for young children as well as heightened
demand for after-school programs for school-aged youth.
Parallel to the national"graying"trend,a larger segment of Dublin's population is also expected fall into the middle
and older age categories than in previous years. Between 1990 and 2010, the percentage of Dublin's population
aged 45 and above has increased from 19.5% to 31.4%,as shown in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2 I Population Structure Comparison (City of Dublin)
3.3% 1990 2010
7.3%
16.296
•Under 18 •Under 18
■18to24 •18to24
•25 to 44 8.096 •25 to 44
11.8%
•45 to 64 •45 to 64
•65 and over •65 and over
This increase in the older adult and senior populations will further impact recreation,leisure and fitness programs.
Anticipation of, and planning for, these shifts in population demographics early in the programming process
allows planning for classes and other opportunities to meet the needs of specific populations in addition to general
recreational programs.
Background and Analysis 's City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 9
Recreational needs specific to age groupings include:
• Pre-school and daycare programs appropriate for ages 0 to 4
• After school,intercession and summer session programs for school ages 5 to 19
• Programs available for young adults, families,working adults and extended use hours for ages 20 to 54
• Older adult and senior programs for those ages 55 and older, and
• Organized leagues, classes and facilities to accommodate age specific programs including youth and adult
sports leagues, art and recreation classes for all ages,senior fitness opportunities,aquatic programs,facilities
rental,community affairs and promotions.
Summary
In general, the recreational needs and interests of the current population are being met by the existing facilities.
However,if the standards outlined in the Master Plan are to be maintained,additional parks and facilities will be
needed in the future.
10 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 44 Background and Analysis
FACILITIES EVALUATION AND DEMAND
Assessment
Identifying recreation needs is a very important component of any park and recreation master plan. Assessment
of need, however, is also one of the most difficult tasks because many variables will influence public recreation
participation and demand.Additionally,in the case of Dublin,a portion of the population being planned for does
not yet reside in the City.It is,therefore,necessary to make projections and assumptions regarding the characteristics
and preferences of the future population.Underestimating the future need can result in overutilization of facilities
whereas overestimating the need can also result in expenditures for facilities that are not required.The Master Plan
does,however,provide flexibility to modify the types of facilities and/or the priority for implementation.This will
allow the City to develop facilities in a sequence that matches the recreation demand of the new residents.
The original Master Plan document studied the demand for recreation facilities and activities and developed a
quantifiable statement of need based on a process that included six steps. They were:
1. An analysis of trends in recreation participation
2. A study of who presently provides recreation service in Dublin
3. An analysis of who currently participates in recreation
4. Results of public workshop meetings
5. The development of park and facility standards
6. Identification of park and facility needs
Each method is described in more detail below.
Participation Ratios
Participation ratios arc guides by which facilities and park acreage required to meet population demand is
quantified. By attaching a standard to a population variable, the future park and facility needs of the City of
Dublin are forecast based on population growth. The most recognized standards used for municipal planning are
those developed by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA). These are only one facet to consider
when establishing standards for Dublin.
User Trend Analysis
Facility demand estimates are developed by extrapolating historical use statistics for each facility.'This methodology
produces reasonably accurate data because it reflects specific community use. However, the trend analysis
methodology can be influenced by local conditions or current trends in recreation interest.As an example, if one
charts tennis playing over the last 20 years, a cycle of interest and level of play emerges.Also,operating conditions
such as quality of the courts, their location, user fees and hours of operation can impact the level of use. Actual
user data from 2014 was evaluated in preparing this master plan.
Public Input
Input from the general public is another method of assessing community needs. Caution is required in relying
solely on this, however, since special interest groups can dominate the process and may not reflect the broader
community interest. In 2008 the City initiated an intensive needs assessment to prepare the Department Strategic
Plan. The process included input from over 1,000 residents. Methods included a statistically valid mail-in survey,
online survey, focus groups and public workshops. In 2012 the City initiated another intensive needs assessment
Background and Analysis Rs City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 11
as an update to the Strategic Plan.The data from these studies was used to prepare this update to the Master Plan.
Standards Definitions
Another means of measuring need is to develop a standard and measure that standard against the existing inventory.
Recreation standards are guides by which Dublin can estimate in quantifiable terms the number of acres and
square feet of facilities required to meet recreation demand. By attaching the standard to a population variable,
it is possible to forecast future needs as the population grows. Standards are important for a number of reasons
including:
• Standards can be an expression of minimum acceptable facilities and areas.They can be looked upon as goals.
• A standard is a guideline to determine land requirements for various types of park and recreation facilities.
• Standards are a basis for relating recreation needs to spatial analysis within a community-wide system of park
and open space areas.
As part of the current update to the Master Plan, analysis was done on the current standard being provided based
on the existing facility inventory and current population.Additionally the occupancy rates of facilities during peak
high-demand periods were analyzed to determine if the current standards are meeting community needs or need
correction to avoid a surplus or deficit of facilities at build-out.
12 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 4' Background and Analysis
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY NEEDS AND STANDARDS
The City of Dublin offers a wide variety of recreational and cultural opportunities to the residents of Dublin. The
City's inventory of facilities generally meets the minimum service standards established by the Master Plan.When
developing the original Master Plan,the City worked with the Dublin Unified School District to upgrade school
facilities in the Primary Planning Area to add to the existing park and sports field inventory and to expand existing
programs to better serve the interest and needs of the existing population.
Dublin, like all Tri-Valley communities, has a very high demand for organized sports programs.Again, the facility
improvements at the schools, the implementation of the Sports Ground Master Plan, and the newer sports fields
at Emerald Glen Park and Fallon Sports Park,will meet most of the existing demand.
This Master Plan update addresses the program and facility needs of the anticipated future population growth.The
development standards for new parks and facilities will provide for quality parks,trails,sports fields and recreation
and cultural facilities needed at build-out in a manner that is fiscally sustainable to operate and maintain.
The previous Parks and Recreation Master Plan only referred to "Community Parks." Based on community input
this Master Plan divides this category into two different types:Active and Natural:
Active Community Park (new category)
Active Community Parks offer a variety of recreational opportunities that attract a wide range of local age groups
and interests. They feature large open space areas, unique natural and cultural areas as well as group picnic areas,
bicycling and hiking trails, sports fields and courts, aquatics facilities, community center or other unique features
or facilities.Active Community Parks are generally 10+acres in size.Examples of Active Community Parks include
Emerald Glen Park, Dublin Sports Grounds, Fallon Sports park, and the Dublin Historic Park.
Natural Community Park (new category)
Natural Community Parks offer a mix of quieter, passive uses such as trails and outlook areas with a few nodes
of more active uses such as a nature interpretive area, picnicking sites, a community and/or children's garden, or
other low-intensity uses. There are no Natural Community Parks that are already developed in Dublin, but the
Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space is planned for a site in the Primary Planning Area.
The other park types in Dublin include:
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Parks are designed to meet the local residents' recreational needs while reflecting the unique
character of each neighborhood. They typically feature spaces for relaxation, practice fields (not for competitive
use), open multi-use areas, playgrounds, and unlit sports courts (e.g. basketball, tennis, bocce). Neighborhood
Parks are generally around five-acres in size.Examples of Neighborhood Parks are Kolb Park,Schaefer Ranch Park,
and Positano Hills Park.
Neighborhood Square
Neighborhood Squares offer specialized facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population or special interest
group such as young children,senior citizens, or in some cases, dogs and their owners.The Neighborhood Square
is a scaled-down version of the Neighborhood Park, with an average size of two acres and located in high density
residential urban areas where a green pocket is the central focus of the neighborhood. Examples of Neighborhood
Squares include Piazza Sorrento and Devaney Square.
Downtown Plaza (new category)
A Downtown Plaza is a new category in this Master Plan, and there is not yet a Downtown Plaza in Dublin.
Background and Analysis +' City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 13
This park can provide a small public space within the 284-acre Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area that would
serve as a public gathering space in this bustling commercial and residential district. The Downtown Plaza could
include benches and seating, public art, historic resources, a small performance space, or other elements that are
appropriate to a small,vibrant urban space.
The Recreation Needs Assessment also identified several major buildings for indusion in the Master Plan. These
facilities have significant costs associated with both the construction and annual operation and maintenance. On
the other hand, due to the demand for facilities and programs these buildings can offer, there can be revenue
generated to offset a portion of the operating costs.A discussion of each of the major facilities follows.
Community Facilities
During peak demand times,there is the need for space for the public to meet for social gatherings such as weddings,
family reunions,banquets, fund raising events; neighborhood meetings; organizational meetings;and clubs,such
as Girl and Boy Scouts, gardening clubs, etc. Through the provision of multi-use space, a myriad of activities can
also be accommodated. These uses can include a preschool, crafts classes, fitness programs, dance, cooking, and a
place for youth to"hang-out" as well as participate in activities and games.
Indoor Recreation Center
The Recreation Needs Assessment, completed in 2005 and approved by the City Council, indicated that the
demand exists for a multi-purpose recreation center. To meet community demands and to generate sufficient
revenue to offset operating costs,the Center must offer a wide range of activities and facilities.These activities and
facilities should include:
1. A pleasant,well-maintained,state-of-the-art facility
2. Activities and facilities that will be of interest to all age groups
3. An environment that encourages use by families
4. Space for drop-in recreation and instructional classes
5. Court space for activities such as basketball and volleyball
6. High quality aerobics and dance studio
Senior Center
When the study was completed, there was demand for an enhanced Senior Center designed solely to serve the
needs of Dublin's mature adult community. Approximately 7.3% of the population is 65 years or older. Dublin's
Senior Center was replaced in 2005 with a state-of-the-art facility that meets the programming needs of today's
active senior population.
Aquatic Facility
When the study was completed, there was demand for a full-scale community pool facility, complete with an
indoor pool with lanes for competitive and recreational swimming,teaching bays for swim lessons,lap swimming
and water exercise and fitness programs; an outdoor sport pool for competitive swimming and water polo. Phase I
of the Emerald Glen Recreation and Aquatic Complex was designed to respond to these needs,and it also includes
an outdoor water playground;six waterslides;a fitness center;locker rooms and administrative offices.Phase II has
been planned to accommodate the Indoor Recreation Center identified above.
Cultural Arts Center
A space that has a lower demand, according to the study, than the community center,recreation center or aquatic
facility is the cultural arts and community theater identified in the original Master Plan. A new state-of-the-art
Performing Arts and Education Center was recently constructed on the Dublin High School Campus.This facility
14 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 * Background and Analysis
will be available for community use and provides adequate rehearsal and performance space for theater, music
and dance. In addition there are other regional theaters in Livermore, Pleasanton,San Ramon and Walnut Creek.
With the plethora of theaters in the region,the Community Theater component has been removed from the future
Cultural Arts Center.This facility will afford cultural,educational and social experiences for the entire community.
It would be a hub for the arts in Dublin,providing opportunities for adults and youth to learn to create with their
hands, develop their artistic potential and share in the vital cultural currents of the community.The primary focus
of the facility would be a gallery space that can multi-function as a social and event space. The facility would also
feature multi-purpose classrooms, music and media rooms.
National Park Standard Comparison
The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) published standards in 1970 that have been widely used
since being adopted. In 1979, NRPA developed a task force that worked three years to revise and update park
and recreation standards. Published in 1983, the report titled "Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and
Guidelines", represented the consensus on space and facility standards at the national level at the time.
In recent years municipalities have started to use other methods to establish standards, realizing that the NRPA
standards are more of a one-size-fits-all approach, and do not take into account the unique demands of individual
regions and communities. In addition to the use of national standards, this update also uses statistical data about
current usage and demand and projects that onto future recreational demands.
Background and Analysis 4. City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 15
Table 1 I Park Standards
Park Facilities NRPA Standards City of Dublin City of Dublin
(acres per 1,000 residents) Existing Service Level Standards
(2015—includes
School Park
Improvements)
Neighborhood Park 1-2 2.109 1.7
Community Park 5-8 3.144 3.3
Special Usc Park Variable Nonc Nonc
Regional Park 5-10 None None
Total (Neighborhood/ 6-10 5.253 5
Community)
16 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 411 Background and Analysis
Table 21 Outdoor Sports Field/Court Standards
Sports Facilities NRPA Standards City of Dublin City of Dublin
Existing Service Standards
Level (2015 -
includes School Park
Improvements)
Baseball Fields 1 per 5,000 1 per 3,237 1 per 3,200
Soccer Fields 1 per 10,000 1 per 3,237 1 per 3,500
Softball Fields 1 per 5,000 1 per 10,357 1 per 15,000
Swimming Pool 1 per 20,000 192 SF per 1,000 400 SF per 1,000
Tennis Courts 1 per 2,000 1 per 2,725 1 per 2,700
Basketball Courts 1 per 5,000 1 per 4,315 1 per 4,300
Cricket Fields 1 per 51,784 1 per 40,000
Volleyball Courts 1 per 5,000 1 per 17,261 1 per 17,000
Note:Data presented in number of facilities per population
*No Standard
Background and Analysis R4 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 201.5 17
Table 3 I Facility Standards Per Capita
Square Feet Persons Square foot per
Capita
Community Center 15,000 25,000 0.60
Recreation Center 15,000 30,000 0.50
Senior Center 5,000 25,000 0.20
Cultural Centers/Museums 16,000 75,000 0.20
Total 1.50
18 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 +!F Background and Analysis
Table 4 I Existing Community Facilities Inventory
Existing Existing
Square Feet Square Feet
per Capita
Community Center Facilities
Shannon Community Center 20,088
Sunday School Barn 2,900
Old St. Raymond Church 1,550
Murray Schoolhouse and Visitor Center 2,482
Subtotal Community Center Facilities 27,020 0.52
Recreation Facilities
Stager Community Gymnasium* 6,002
Dublin Swim Center 9,800
Emerald Glen Recreation&Aquatic Complex—Phase I 30,480
Subtotal Indoor Recreation Facilities 44,421 0.86
*Stager is a joint-use facility. The City has use 69% of available time annually. Total SF prorated for City share.
Senior Center Facilities
Dublin Senior Center 15,500
Subtotal Senior Center Facilities 15,500 0.30
CulturaUMuseum Facilities
Kolb House Museum 2,304
Old House Art Building 1,650
Subtotal Cultural/Museum Facilities 3,954 0.08
Background and Analysis City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 19
Stager Community Gym is a joint-use facility with the Dublin Unified School District, in which City has use
69% of available time annually. The gym includes one full-court and two half-courts for basketball; two courts
for volleyball;lobby and restrooms.There is an adjoining multi-purpose room the City can reserve as available for
City and community programming.
The Dublin Senior Center provides community gathering and programming space for adults in Dublin in a
facility adjacent to the Wicklow Square Senior Apartments in Downtown Dublin.
Shannon Community Center serves as the City's primary rental facility for social gatherings. It features a large
hall that seats 300 for dining and can be used for a variety of dasses and programs. There is a catering kitchen for
culinary programs. The facility features two multi-purpose spaces as well as a preschool wing with two classrooms
and support spaces.
The Dublin Civic Center and Library provide several multi-purpose spaces that are available for recreational and
cultural classes,civic meetings and community rentals.
The Emerald Glen Recreation Center and Aquatic Complex Phase I is under construction and includes an
indoor pool with six lanes for lap swimming, water exercise and fitness programs, and three large teaching bays
for swim lessons; an outdoor sport pool for competitive swimming and water polo with eight lanes and three
additional warm-up lanes; an outdoor water playground; six waterslides; a fitness center; and locker rooms and
administrative offices.
The Heritage Park Sunday School Barn,Art Studio and Old St.Raymond Church facilities serve primarily as
community centers for smaller social gatherings, classes,events and drop-in performing arts programs.
The Murray Schoolhouse Museum is a historic facility and cultural center that has two primary spaces. An
Exhibit called "The Journey" is featured in the main room of the Schoolhouse and depicts the journey Dublin's
early settlers took from New York to California. The secondary classroom is used as a multi-purpose space for
classes, meetings and temporary exhibitions.
The Kolb House Museum is a historical facility that is used primarily as a period-museum depicting ranch life in
the early 1900s. In addition to providing tours the facility also has archival rooms for research and special projects.
In order to meet the standards identified in this Master Plan, the City may need to build an additional 40,000
square feet of facility space. Public Facilities Fees charged on new development and existing fund balances would
pay for the construction of these new facilities. In order to the most efficient and effective way to use this future
public facility space, the City should conduct a new "Facilities Feasibility Study". This study would identify
current community priorities and interests for future facilities and amenities; develop program needs; identify
level of community willingness to pay for programs and the ongoing operations and maintenance of the facilities;
and identify potential locations for future facilities. Prior to including any of these future facilities in the Capital
Improvement Program the City shall develop a business plan for each facility to refine the ongoing operational
subsidy and replacement costs to the General Fund.
20 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 +'F Background and Analysis
4 g
PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY INVENTORY
The City of Dublin has 18 parks, 5 deeded park sites, and 6 school parks and City-owned open space areas that
account for nearly 233 acres of dedicated open space and developed park land. In addition the City has over 59
acres of undeveloped parkland that has either been offered for dedication by landowners or acquired by the City.
Table 5 (below) identifies the existing parks and open space in Dublin.
Table 51 Existing Parkland Inventory
Park Type Acres
Active Community Parks
Dublin Civic Center/Library Grounds 11.420
Dublin Historic Park and Museums (new) 4.200
Dublin Historic Park and Museums (original) 3.580
Dublin Senior Center 2.000
Dublin Sports Grounds 22.770
Dublin Swim Center 3.600
Emerald Glen Park 49.137
Fallon Sports Park 27.200
Fallon Sports Park(deeded/credits; unimproved) 32.863
Shannon Park 9.670
Total Active Community Park 166.440
Natural Community Parks
Iron Horse Nature Park(purchased;unimproved) 12.129
Total Natural Community Parks 12.129
continuer..
Background and Analysis R. City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 21
Park Type Acres
Neighborhood Parks and Squares
Alamo Creek Park 5.260
Bray Commons 4.780
Devany Square 1.910
Dolan Park 4.850
Dougherty Hills Dog Park 1.430
Jordan Ranch NP (deeded/credits; unimproved) 4.990
Jordan Ranch NS (deeded/credits; unimproved) 2.000
Kolb Park 4.860
Mape Memorial Park 2.680
Passatempo Park 5.010
Piazza Sorrento 2.000
Positano Hills Park 4.600
Sean Diamond (deeded/credits; unimproved) 5.030
Schaefer Ranch Park 10.550
Stagecoach Park 0.820
Ted Fairfield Park 6.970
Total Neighborhood Parks and Squares 67.740
School Parks(Serve as Neighborhood Parks)
Dublin Elementary School 8.800
Dublin High School 5.400
Frederiksen Elementary School 7.800
Murray Elementary School 8.600
Nielsen Elementary School 5.400
Wells Middle School 7.600
Total School Park Land 43.600
Total Existing Parkland Developed 232.897
Total Existing Parkland Undeveloped 57.012
Total Existing Parkland "
22 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 OF Background and Analysis
Table 6 I Park Amenities
1y 91 U y oh • r!i - • N et p "p
Alamo Creek Park
7601 S h a d y Creek Road z z z z z z z z
B r a y Commons x x x* x x x x x z x
3300 Finnian Way
Devany Square
4405 Chancery Lane z a z,z x
Dolan Park
11651 Padre W a y z Y z x z x z a
Dougherty Hills Dog Park z z
Amador Valley Blvd.&Stagecoach Road
Dublin Heritage Park&Museums
6600 Donlon Way z x x x I x
Dublin Sports Grounds z z x z a z z z z z z
6700 Dublin Blvd.
Emerald Glen Park
4201 Central Pkwy. z z z x x x x Y x x z x
z x
Fallon Sports Park z z z x z Y z z
4605 Lockhart Street
Kolb Park
8020 Bristol Road x Y x z x z x Y a
Mape Memorial P a r k z Y Y z z x z z
11711 Mape Way
Passatempo Park
3200 Palermo W a y x x z x Y a Y
Piazza Sorrento
3600 Palermo Way I I z z
Positano Hills Park
2301 Valentano Drive x z x a x z x z
Schaefer Ranch Park
9595 Dublin Boulevard Ix z x Z a z a z z
Shannon Park
z x Y x x
11600 Shannon Avenue x z z
Stagecoach Park
7550 Stagecoach Road Z a z z
Ted Fairfield Park
3400 Antone W a y x z z z z a a z x z z
Background and Analysis 1,11 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 23
FUTURE PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
There will be additional parks needed in the future to provide recreational spaces for residents that are not yet
here. Listed below are future parks that are included in the General Plan, but that have not yet been acquired or
improved by the City.
Table 7 1 Future Parks and Open Space Inventory
Park Type Acres
Community Parks—Active
Jordan Ranch Community Park (Mission Valley) 10.080
Jordan Ranch Community Park (Chen) 7.200
Dublin Crossing Community Park 30.000
Wallis Ranch Community Park 7.660
Total Community Park Active 54.94E
Neighborhood Parks
Croak Neighborhood Park A 5.000
Croak Neighborhood Park B 5.500
Sub Area 3 Neighborhood Square 2.000
Moller Ranch Neighborhood Square 1.100
Dublin Crossing Neighborhood Park 5.000
Total Neighborhood Parks 18.6
24 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 Al Background and Analysis
Figure 3I Fxtaind and Argun Baia,Farilisia,and Opal Spa
e DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN (Figure3)
DUI Difiig EXISTING AND FUTURE PARKS, FACILITIES, AND OPEN SPACE March 16, 2015
PS 1.1.1611se P.PO usiNNINNNym
IV CWICerreaq Pie a...■waM e
nr r.eMrwP.NNA elx NO,
.i0 Mi..wMie , DOOIA
II!
YIP lrwyseM `t+.'•' ...
PM P.m MR
PO Ron Pat r.
P R"smwwrrwM .---___._" , k� ,MY.e<.....r.«n.wws M. ?��
•OorloaCM, — � # .,��1�,., �,. , .
x.IN *INN M e C1 St �, �E ! ��� ��' �%4
In DelmiNg
1.....1•114.1 ��' { ,r . 094 J—I I u , ....di ,v
wn �q.r Western extendedt7lenning Am w •���� � Y r, 401% j; i s w a.nwrr. -—���J,T5tV3_p .111 ittr�.� jh
sr MM.
•, POPOW,.w
IW• • b, a, I t eA
• � f���.t f
11( �ki ?1�L�i e1•m .Ntwas
123 i.. ` Lt.:, _^ �i♦
N I ANON _ 1 41,---.11. l/1i
PM Nrnee N.
4 HrM +
.. R..N 4N4..., = • ±fi .r l►ilbe,iMr
rn nunM ..J • : e••_ _ i
�. p:i
�.._. - - \ -' --
D ir 1 , ..Weslem Extended Planning Area Boundary 0 City of Dubin —Class I,Existing,Shared Use Path Class IIB,Proposed,Buffered Bicycle Lanes(Existing Class 2A)
0 Primary Planning Area Boundary ED Sphere of Influence Class I.Proposed,Shared Use PethPeth —pass III,Existing,Bicycle Route
r d Eastern Extended Planning Area Boundary - Streets —Class II,Existing,Bicycle Lanes --= Class IIIA,Proposed,Bicycle Route with Shallows
r–1 Dublin Crossing Planning Area Boundary ®Parks --- Class II,Proposed,Bicycle Lanes
—Recreation
IM Trailhead Class IIA,Proposed,Bicycle Lanes(One-Side) ••••• Proposed Recreation
--- Class IIB,Proposed,Buffered Bicycle Lanes
Background and Analysis 4 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 25
This page Intentionally lek blank
F i g u r e 4 1 a i a i u a and F u t u r e Srhw4 awl P,d&Z rds
it DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN (Figure4)
Dail' EXISTING AND FUTURE SCHOOLS AND PUBLIC LANDS March 16, 2015
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SI Nieben EleneM ry School
52 Dubin Elemedary School -
53 Murray Elementary School DOOLA
.
54 Dubin Unified School District c ,..' u ,• .
55 Dubin High School it
56 imdwaunF4mrnary Scheel i
S7 Valley High School and Stager Community Gym
Sa Web Middle Scheel . 1,� r.n.a...r.!r.«...rn�.q.v« t .
ss ouujanry[heunrHry Salmi `1l `
513 Eleanor Murray Fallon School ato► s." ! 1 ��
511 John Green Ekmenlery School VC � ii11 _�� r G� 1+ tr %512 H.W.Kob Elementary 5drod a/�� �1i �,I _r—�..... �� �11_, q 513 AmadorElemMa School 1.��. . ` g: . � �- are „i+_ i 514 E-5 ry ;`1 r. `,, 1 �'�.S�l O �r f 11►
515 Future School !1 , •• 7.
G -∎ ` fiv- 0 E a n r • ISpu � 1 6;,..iiio-ints,FW
ill OWillialk %or -az-AN *.1 MIS„....„ Wee
P4,141sii)i --..4,eadoll41,'\ 11111,1003, 11111W111111111.1.1111011114 116;01112 111
vr
ID Western Extended Planning Area Boundary i.-Ii Eastern Extended Planning Area Boundary CI City of Dublin • Public Schools
CD Primary Planning Area Boundary Eil Dublin Crossing Planning Area Boundary El Sphere of Influence I Streets
Background and Analysis*City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Ran—May 2015 27
Vila page intentionally left blank
Utilizing data gathered through workshops, interviews and review of existing recreation programs and facility
usage data, the Park Master Plan establishes the number and type of facilities which will be required if the City of
Dublin is to meet the recreation needs of future residents at the level of service enjoyed by the current population.
This Master Plan was developed incorporating the development plans of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan,Dublin
Crossing Specific Plan, Downtown Specific Plan and the Western Dublin Extended Planning Areas to ensure
consistency and compatibility with previously established goals. The Master Plan emphasizes the acquisition and
development of community parks and restricting the use of neighborhood parks to those activities which will have
a limited impact on adjacent residential uses.Table 8, Park Facility Distribution, describes a possible distribution
of parks and other facilities.
Background and Analysis '!' City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 29
Table 81 Park Facility Distribution
.max" `� " � t '�-
Current Inventory —'�, m. 1.-1 c,
C3�
Proposed Facilities: N oo
Facilities Needed Based on NEW Ratio N '^ N N 'd' N M
Proposed Standard: 1 Per X N °
13 ° c°r) $ scp
ch ,� K) N so' I^ `d
Existing Condition: 1 Per X c` o etiN m
; c
30 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 '!s Background and Analysis
The careful siting of new facilities and buildings within a major park complex provides opportunity for shared
use on the site. This can reduce the acreage required for parking, vehicular and emergency vehicle access, some
building sizes and provides other types of land use efficiencies. It must be noted that if these facilities are not sited
in the proposed parks or as parts of a larger complex, the acreage requirements may be increased.Table 4 has been
used as the basis to develop the guidelines for the character and programs for the various types of parks currently
within Dublin and for those types of parks to be developed in the future.
As population growth and community needs are more precisely defined,the facility distribution plan and standards
must also be refined and development priorities identified. In the previous chapters, Table 5 identifies existing
parks and school grounds for sports fields.Table 7 identifies future park locations, and Figures 3 and 4 illustrate
the Existing and Future Parks and Open Space,Schools and Public Lands within the community.Table 9 (below)
identifies other key areas in which there may exist opportunities to acquire additional park land to meet the 5 acre
per 1,000 standard, benefit underserved areas (such as Downtown Dublin), and provide more passive recreation-
oriented Natural Community Parks.
Table 91 Bridging the Gap—Identifying Future Potential Acquisitions
Existing and Planned Park Acreage 363.5 acres
Total Park Acreage Need at General Plan build-out(75,000 residents) 375.0 acres
Deficit -11.5 acres
Potential Future Sites Future Park Type
Sub-Area 3 10.75 acres Natural Community Park
Wallis Ranch Public/Semi Public Parcel 1.90 acres Active Community Park
TBD 0.50-0.75 acres Downtown Plaza
South of Dublin Boulevard between Tassajara and Fallon Roads 2.0 acres Neighborhood Square
Expansion of Community Park on Chen Property 5.0 acres Community Park
Historic Park Expansion to DHPA Property 0.9 acres Active Community Park
Total of Potential Future sites 21 +1-acres
Background and Analysis Re City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 201.5 31
This page intentionally left blank.
City of Dublin
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
20I5
Chapter 2
PARKS AND RECREATION
FACILITY STANDARD
INTRODUCTION
Park Types and Standards
There are a number of types of public facilities in Dublin. Dublin has two types of Community Parks:Active,and
Natural.
Dublin has several Active Community Parks, including the Sports Grounds, Emerald Glen Park, and Fallon
Sports Park. Each of these Active Community Parks has a Park Master Plan that was developed with input from
the community, reviewed by the Parks and Community Services Commission, and which was approved by the
City Council. Each Park Master Plan is specific to the Active Community Park and it identifies the recreational
amenities and facilities that are to be constructed within the park.
The Sports Grounds is fully developed and will require renovation in the coming years. Emerald Glen Park has its
fourth (and final) phase under construction with a 2017 opening. Fallon Sports Park has one phase constructed
with two more forthcoming as funding becomes available. Lastly, Dublin's Historic Park has already completed all
of the facility development, and the Historic Park Master Plan identifies enhancements in the future.
Dublin currently has one Natural Community Park: The Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space. The Park
Master Plan was approved for this facility in 2013.
Future Community Parks, including the Dublin Crossing Community Park and the Jordan Ranch Community
Park,will each develop Park Master Plans after engaging in a community process to determine the desired amenities
for that specific park site.Active Community Parks typically indude a variety of actively-programmed sports fields
and courts as well as other components that help"round out" the park.Natural Space Community Parks typically
respond to the community's desire to have non-programmed public spaces that focus more on passive recreation,
the preservation or enhancement of natural landscapes,and limited sports facilities.Like Active Community Parks,
each new Natural Community Park will have a Park Master Plan developed that outlines the specific features that
the park will have once completed.
Neighborhood Parks do not have individual Park Master Plans developed for each one, but rather descriptive
standards have been developed to elaborate on the characteristics of the three types of Neighborhood Parks to aid
Facility Standards 4, City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 33
in the future design and development of new facilities:
• Typical Neighborhood Park
• Neighborhood Square
• Downtown Plaza
34 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 ' Facility Standards
�a
ACTIVE COMMUNITY PARK STANDARDS
Active Community Parks should offer a variety of recreational opportunities that attract a wide range of local age
groups and interests.Active Community Parks should feature large open space areas,unique natural,historic,and/
or cultural areas as well as group picnic areas, bicycling and hiking trails, sports facilities, dog runs, community
facilities, and other unique features or facilities.
Size: Approximately 10 to 60 acres
Service Area: Preferably centralized within the City of Dublin.
Access/Location: Highly visible and easily accessible. These Community Parks should be utilized to
create a central focus for the Dublin community Active Community Parks with
future phases include Dublin Crossing Community Park, Fallon Sports Park,Jordan
Ranch Community Park and Wallis Ranch Community Park.
Park Design: Active Community Parks should create a memorable social hub and landmark public
destination.
Facilities that maximize the recreational and leisure experience of all residents.
Provide a mixture of facilities to attract a broad spectrum of user groups.
Provide a sense of connection linking the uses on the site to the surrounding retail,
residential or recreational facilities.
Play Area: High quality and innovative play structures.
Larger than neighborhood parks.
Separate facilities for tots from those for older children.
Provide parents seating area.
Potential Sports Facilities: Ball fields (60-foot, 80-foot and 90-foot), graded and maintained for practice and
competitive baseball.
Spectator amenities.
Regulation soccer fields with a combination of natural and synthetic turf
Practice soccer fields (may overlap ball fields).
Cricket field.
Football field.
Futsol court (may overlap with basketball).
Outdoor basketball courts.
Outdoor volleyball courts.
Lighted tennis courts.
Frisbee golf
Exercise equipment.
Picnic Facilities: Shaded and secluded picnic areas with tables for 6 to 8 people located throughout the
park providing areas for spontaneous picnic use.
Group picnic facilities by reservation.
Natural Areas: Open meadow zones that provide soft, green use areas for picnics, informal sports as
well as passive group and individual uses.
Provide pedestrian trails to link with regional trail and transit systems.
Potential Special Features: Dog runs.
Multi-Purpose Room Buildings for classes and camps.
Facility Standards 4G City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 35
Cultural and Performing Arts spaces.
Public Art for visual impact.
Community garden.
Maintenance yard for the park.
Additional unique features may include an education center or museum, outdoor
amphitheater, rose gardens, or outdoor wedding facilities.
Restrooms: Permanent restroom structure.
Parking: Sufficient parking lot to accommodate demand during high use periods.
36 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 R. Facility Standards
NATURAL COMMUNITY PARK STANDARDS
Natural Community Parks should offer a variety of passive recreational opportunities that attract a range of age
groups of people looking for a more serene park experience.Natural Community Parks should feature areas that are
primarily un-programmed and more natural in appearance, often including features that have historically existed
on the site, such as hills, creek or wetland features, or man-made structures such as bridges or small buildings.
Size: Varies depending on location and adjacencies.
Service Area: The Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space is to be constructed in the Primary
Planning Area. Future Natural Community Parks should be located in the Western
and/or Eastern Extended Planning Area.
Access/Location: Dependent on the location of the natural features to be enhanced and/or retained.
Park Design: Natural Community Parks should create a space for quiet, passive enjoyment of the
natural landscape primarily with low-intensity uses and a few active nodes. Uses that
may be appropriate for inclusion in a Natural Community Park include:
• Trails and sitting areas.
• Wildlife viewing platforms.
• Outdoor educational spaces.
• Nature interpretive areas with signage.
• Shaded and secluded picnic areas with tables for 6 to 8 people located throughout
the park providing available areas for small-scale picnic use.
• Community and/or children's garden.
• Par course style exercise.
• Open meadow zones that provide soft, green use areas for informal sports as well
as passive group and individual uses.
• Public restrooms.
• Parking area.
• High quality and innovative natural play features built into the landscape may be
appropriate in limited areas.
• Ample pedestrian and bicycle connections to nearby residential areas.
• Other appropriate facilities that maximize the recreational and leisure experience
of all residents.
Facility Standards 4' City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 37
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK STANDARDS
The neighborhood park can be the visual and social center for the local community. In addition to meeting the
local residents' recreational needs,the neighborhood park is also a"village green."These parks should be designed
to reflect the unique character of each neighborhood.
Neighborhood parks are developed to provide space for relaxation, play and informal recreation activities in a
specific neighborhood or cluster of residential units. The park improvements are oriented toward the individual
recreational needs of the neighborhood in which it is located. Facilities should be designed to include practice
fields and not for competitive use,which traditionally bring more traffic into a neighborhood.
Development Criteria: Approximately 5 to 7 net acres.
Service Area: Service area defined by major arterials or topography.
Adjacent to neighborhood boundaries or open space area,visible from neighborhood
entry.
Site Characteristics: Major percentage of the site should be level to accommodate active recreation uses.
Natural or visual qualities to enhance the character.
Access/Location: Minimum of two public street frontages.
On collector or residential streets; not major arterials.
Park Design: Central green/social center for neighborhood. Reflect character of setting—natural
features or architectural style of homes.
Play Area: Tot lot for children 2-4 years.
Playground for youths 5 - 12 years.
Parents seating area.
Potential Sports Facilities: Turf fields graded and maintained for practice softball/baseball (minimum 250'
outfield) and soccer(minimum 180').
Tcnnis courts.
Volleyball courts.
Outdoor basketball courts.
Walking track.
Exercise/Par-Course Equipment.
Picnic Facilities: Tables and secluded space for informal family picnics up to 6- 8 people.
Barbecue facilities in family-sized picnic areas.
Natural Areas: Open space meadow for informal sports, games and passive activities.
Restrooms: Two unisex restrooms.
Parking: Sufficient off-street parking where minimum street frontages are not provided.
Lockable parking for 6- 10 bicycles.
Lighting: Provide lighting for security purposes not for night-use activities.Avoid penetration of
unwanted light into adjacent neighborhood.
38 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 Facility Standards
woossolir
NEIGHBORHOOD SQUARE STANDARDS
Neighborhood Squares provide specialized facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population or special
interest group such as young children or senior citizens. The Neighborhood Square is a scaled-down version of
the Neighborhood Park,with an average size of 2-acres and located in high density residential urban areas where
a green pocket is the central focus of the neighborhood.
Site Characteristics: Approximately 2-net-acres on a predominately level site.
Access/Location: Prominent location preferably at cross street. Within neighborhoods and in close
proximity to apartment complexes,townhouse development or housing for the elderly.
Linked with trails and pedestrian walkways.
Park Design: Each park should have unique characteristics such as public art, fountain,bandstand,
formal gardens, etc. to create a focal point for high density areas.
Develop plaza areas for gathering and neighborhood social events.
Play Area: Small scale, high quality play structures.
Parents seating area.
Sports Facilities: As appropriate to user groups in adjacent homes; provide tennis court, volleyball
court, or basketball court.
Picnic Facilities: Tables and benches with limited open space for individual use.
Seat walls for informal picnicking.
Natural Areas: Views and vistas are desirable.
Restrooms: Not provided.
Parking: Street parking.
Lighting: As necessary for security only.
Facility Standards 4' City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 39
DOWNTOWN PLAZA STANDARDS
Urban Plazas provide a public gathering place for the Downtown area.
Site Characteristics: 0.5 net acres minimum on a predominately level site.
Access/Location: Prominent site, preferably at a historically-relevant location or a centrally-located site
in the Downtown.
Linked with pedestrian walkways that access commercial,civic,and/or residential uses
in Downtown Dublin is preferred.
Park Design: Should have unique characteristics such as public art, fountain, seating, etc. to create
a focal point for gathering and social events.
Play Area: Small scale, high quality play structures may be appropriate with a parents seating
area.
Sports Facilities: None.
Picnic Facilities: Tables and benches with limited open space for individual use and seatwalls for
informal picnicking.
Natural Areas: Views and vistas are desirable.
Restrooms: Not provided.
Parking: Street parking.
Lighting: As necessary for security only.
40 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 I; Facility Standards
CULTURAL ARTS CENTER STANDARDS
A Cultural Arts Center can provide a multi-use facility that affords cultural, educational and social opportunities
for the entire community.The primary focus of this facility would be the Gallery and adjacent multi-purpose space
making it a destination for exhibitions and social events. The facility would also feature classrooms to support a
variety of cultural arts experiences.
Size: Dependent on program study.
Development Criteria: One facility per community.
Acreage: Dependent on program study.
Service Area: Centralized to major population centers.
Site Characteristics: Predominantly level.
Interesting natural or visual characteristics such as existing trees, creek,vistas.
Access/Location: Located on a major arterial or collector road with high visibility
Twenty minute driving time.
Facility Design: Memorable public destination point which would be a source of pride for the City.
Destination that will serve the diverse needs of the entire Community.
Indoor Facilities: Lobby and Reception.
Classroom/Music Room.
Art Classrooms.
Gallery Space.
Multi-Use Room.
Administrative Space.
Special Features: Outdoor patios.
Facility Standards 's City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 41
TRAIL STANDARDS
There are three basic types of trail types that may be found in Dublin-hiking and jogging,bicycle,and equestrian.
Trails are different than parkways or paths within neighborhoods that are privately maintained, and they are
different than sidewalk or bike lanes as described in the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. While those
facilities are great amenities for the community, they are not counted as parkland,whereas a trail that is improved
to the standards contained within this Master Plan and dedicated to public use can be considered parkland.
The types of trails that have standards in this Master Plan include:
Parkway Trail: Paved path suitable for bicycles and pedestrians which is physically separated from the
street and not a part of the road section.
Creekside Trail: Paved trails along creeks for pedestrian and potential bicycle use.
Open Space Trail: Unpaved trails for equestrian and hiking use.
Hikers, joggers and strollers make up the majority of trail users. This group naturally prefers to use trails that
are safe, that provide good footing and that are routed through interesting landscape with attainable destination
points and offer some amenities along the way such as benches and rest areas. Pedestrians will use all of the trail
types noted above.
Cyclists typically use the Parkway and Creekside Trails. Recreational cyclists typically prefer trails which have
smooth surfaces (preferably paved) and which are separated from other types of traffic. Often traveling a distance
of 25 miles on an outing, the serious recreational cyclist prefers trails with sweeping curves, good visibility,and a
minimum of cross streets.
Equestrians typically use Open Space Trails,which are generally planned for the outlying areas of the City where
there is more open space and natural landscape. Because of the limited available space in Dublin, equestrian trails
are intended to connect with other regional-serving trails in neighboring communities and park districts.
General Trail Design
Trail design should include appropriate landscaping to provide a pleasant visual and physical environment,
including protection from sun,wind, and noise where possible.
• Where feasible and desirable, trail projects should accommodate more than one type of trail use.
• Designed to require as little maintenance as possible over time and to avoid steep inclines.
• Preserve existing vegetation,removing only as much as necessary to accommodate the trail.Analyze existing
topography and locate trails so that minimal grading is required.
Parkway Trail Design
The parkway links areas within the community.As an important recreation and transportation corridor, it should
be visually distinct. It should accommodate both bicyde and pedestrian use, both separated from the street. The
parkway should be well landscaped and lighted.
Easement Width: Minimum 20 feet with landscaping on either side of formal paths.
Pedestrian Path: Minimum 5 feet wide, concrete.
Bicycic Path: Minimum 8 fcct, maximum 12 fcct widc; 12 fcct whcrc joint use with pedestrians.
Asphalt or concrete.
Rest Areas: Rest area should include a bench and drinking fountain.
42 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 I; Facility Standards
Creekside Trail Design
• Creekside trails are a desirable community amenity and are a scenic and educational resource.
• Width of creek trails should be a function of amount of use and sensitivity of natural resource. However, a
minimum 8'width is desirable.
• Creek trail design and location should be coordinated with Alameda County Flood Control (Zone 7),
California State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and EBRPD (as appropriate).
• Maintenance roads/paths along creek banks can frequently serve as trails. The final design of the trail must
accommodate appropriate maintenance.
• Where possible, creek trails should be located at top of bank. Because these areas are flat, grading is kept
to a minimum and existing vegetation can be preserved. Erosion and bank stabilization problems are also
minimized. Access to and from streets and access by disabled persons is generally easier when the trail is
located at the top of bank.
• Where creek trails must be located on slopes, a bench will have to be cut into the slope to provide a flat
platform for the trail. The cut should be minimized to preserve as much native vegetation as possible.
• Generally,thc trail should be located as high above the crcck as possible. Ease of access to and from thc street
and by disabled persons should be considered when locating a trail on a slope.
• Provide rest areas and overlooks with educational signagc to enhance enjoyment of crcck arca.
• Special wildlife habitat areas should be protected from access. Habitat restoration and creek revegetation
should occur in degraded crcck arcas.
• Where creeks are deeply incised, railing or fencing may be necessary to prevent access to the creek.
Open Space Trail Design
Open space trails, at a minimum, may be narrow corridors that provide critical linkage to important facilities.
However, at best, open space trail corridors may incorporate many hundreds of acres of significant open space
and provide the public with unique opportunities to enjoy the natural environment between developed areas.
Frequently, trails in open space areas follow old jeep roads or fire roads.
The ideal alignment will "fit" the trail to the ground and will afford users the best views from the trail as well as
follow the topography of the land.
• Long, straight stretches should be avoided as well as excessive switch backs.
• Avoid areas with high soil erosion,high fire hazard or unstable slopes.
• Where possible, route trails away from residences in order to maintain privacy.
• Establish trail rights-of-way that are wide enough to accommodatc the designated uscs.For single or double-
use trails that permit hiking and/or equestrian use, provide a minimum right-of-way width of 20 feet.
Multiple-use trails that permit hiking, equestrian and bicycle use, provide a minimum right-of-way width
of 30 to 40 feet.
Staging Area And Trail Head
A trail staging area is best located on arterial or collector roads in areas that are both convenient to the public and
that are easily accessible for maintenance and operation purposes.
• Where possible, located away from nearby residents.
• Provide lights, gates and fencing, as well as fire hydrants and fire truck turnarounds that address specific
needs of police and fire departments.
Facility Standards a!' City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 43
• Identify and utilize existing parking lots on schools and park facilities,wherever possible,to avoid duplication
of staging facilities.
A trail head is smaller,often consisting of nothing more than a sign. It may also include a small rest area.Whether
staging area or trail head, each should be improved to include:
• Signs indicating by color and/or graphics trail type;trail name(if appropriate);distance to distinctive feature
or trail junction;
• Map (where appropriate) showing overall system;
• Trash and recycling receptacle(s).
44 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 Facility Standards
City of Dublin
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
2015
Chapter 3
GOALS AND POLICIES
PARK SYSTEM
The plan provides direction for addressing the long-term recreational needs of the City and its changing population
at build-out in accordance with the General Plan.The plan emphasizes providing community facilities to meet the
program demands of the Dublin population.
Based on a projected service population of 75,000 at build-out, a 380-acre park system is required based on
providing 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, which has been the City standard since the Master Plan was first
developed.As the existing park system (including deeded, but undeveloped, parkland) consists of approximately
278 acres (including five school park sites in the Primary Planning Area), this plan calls for the acquisition of an
additional 102 acres of parkland.The total park acreage currendy planned for the eastern and western growth areas
in the General Plan, combined with the existing park acreage anticipates a deficit of approximately 16 acres at
build-out of the City.Consequently it will be necessary to pursue additional opportunities for parkland acquisition
as the City reaches its ultimate population. Since there is little undeveloped and entitled land remaining in the
City limits, the City will need to consider alternative parkland dedication standards to meet the needs of existing
and future residents.
This plan, combined with the City's recently updated Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, also provides for a
network of park trails, bikeways, staging areas and open space that will link the parks into a community-wide
system.This system will serve to visually link the new eastern and western growth areas into a visually unified city.
Since the adoption of the latest Park and Recreation Master Plan (updated in 2006), the costs to operate and
maintain parks and facilities has increased significantly. Therefore the updated goals and policies in this Master
Plan update are focused on balancing the demands with the need to develop a fiscally-sustainable park system.
The City will plan to meet the future parkland needs using the following strategies:
• The acquisition and development of community and neighborhood park facilities in the yet-to-be-developed
portions of the City;
• The acquisition and development of passive, un-programmed, nature parks as part of the community park
standard; and
• The assumption that the City of Dublin will utilize all available and appropriate school property in eastern
Dublin (as has been done in the primary planning area) to allow for park acquisition while minimizing
future operation and maintenance costs.
Goals and Policies ,F City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 45
The guiding principles on which Dublin has built its Park and Recreation Master Plan are:
• Meeting community-wide recreation needs;
• Meeting local neighborhood recreation needs;
• Providing open space areas which protect the existing natural character of the area; and
• Establishing linkages (trails, streets, bikeways) which unite the park system into a cohesive whole.
Each of these principles has been incorporated into an overall plan,with the Guiding Policies and Action Programs
outlined below:
GOAL 1: Provide for a high-quality and diversified park system to meet the recreational needs and quality
of life goals of existing and future residents of Dublin.
Guiding Policies
1.1 Ensure a minimum standard of 5.0 acres of public park per 1,000 residents with the following ratios:
A. Establish a community park standard of 3.2 acres for every 1,000 residents. The community park
standards shall be further divided as follows:
Al. 2.8 acres for Active Community Parks on usable acreage that is level land that can be utilized for
active facilities (i.e. ball fields, buildings, courts,etc.).
A2. 0.4 acres for Natural Community Parks.
B. Establish a Neighborhood Park standard of 1.8 acre for every 1,000 residents. Neighborhood Parks
should be dispersed throughout the community. Included in this standard are Neighborhood Squares
and Downtown Plazas.The parks should be designed and sited to provide a neighborhood identity and
social focus and be on level land that can be utilized for active recreational facilities.
1.2 Use the following criteria when considering the suitability of potential park sites:
• Accessibility of the site to the total Dublin community.Avoid sites that are removed from multi-modal
circulation corridors;
• Proximity to other public facilities such as schools;
• Relationship to natural features (creeks, knolls, open space). Where possible, park sites should be
selected to relate to natural features such as creeks or open space;
• Visual presence(visibility from major roadways).The park system is an integral part of the community's
image thus, the view of recreation facilities from roadways is critical not only to encourage use but to
enhance the"look"of the City.Avoid creating terraces where possible,which place the park significantly
above the road and provide only views of steep slopes; and
• Select park sites where the configuration and slope will accommodate the proposed facilities. Limit
site development constraints such as steep topography for active community and neighborhood parks.
Where possible, avoid sites that are subject to strong winds.
1.3 Create a park system in which each park satisfies the recreation needs of a variety of user groups and a
range of active and passive activities.
1.4 In order to insure permanent availability of facilities for the entire community, private recreation
facilities that have restricted entry may not be considered adequate substitutions for public parks.They
are an additional amenity that are available to certain residents and/or user groups and are recognized
as valuable features in the community.
1.5 incorporate community input into the planning and design of specific park facilities.
46 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 Goals and Policies
1.6 Identify sites for parkland acquisition in order to provide for the anticipated deficit of 16+ acres.
Action Program
1 a. Complete the development of the 48+ acre Emerald Glen Park adjacent to Tassajara Creek.
1 b. Complete the development of the 60+ acre Fallon Sports Park to meet the community demand for
high-quality competitive sports fields.
1c. Develop the 30+acre Dublin Crossing Community Park in accordance with the new Park Master Plan.
1 d. Identify additional acreage south of the existing planned Jordan Ranch Community Park to help address
the anticipated park deficit.
1 e. Discourage development of parks of less than 5 acres with the exception of the neighborhood squares
located in higher density areas and Downtown Plaza(s) located in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan
area.
1£ Seek to preserve existing and to acquire additional sites of historical interest as identified in the Dublin
Historic District Specific Plan and the Dublin Historic Park Master Plan (i.e.the Green Store,Alamilla
Spring, and the Cottage at Dublin Kennel).
lg. Require recycled water use for landscape irrigation in accordance with DSRSD's recycled water policy
for park development. Work with DSRSD to convert existing parks using potable water to recycled
water for irrigation.
lh. Design community facilities to encourage evening use. Limit night lighting of neighborhood parks to
level adequate for security
Identify sites for new Natural Community Parks to alleviate the 16+ acre deficiency at build-out of the
General Plan.
LINEAR PARKS AND TRAILS
Linear parks with trails and un-programmed uses are one of the fastest growing segments of public park and
recreation activity. Linear parks are primarily for pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle use and they can be local or
part of a more extensive regional system.They can serve as transportation alternatives for students traveling to and
from school, residents traveling around town,and commuters.
Linear parks and trails may be narrow corridors that provide critical linkage to important facilities. At best,
however,trail corridors may incorporate many hundreds of acres of significant open space and provide the public
with unique opportunities to enjoy the natural environment between developed areas. EBRPD has developed a
regional trail plan which includes trail corridors within Dublin. Thus,Dublin's trail system can be linked into the
overall Tri-Valley network.
GOAL 2: Create a continuous network of linear parks, paths, walks, and trails, thereby providing a
recreational resource of routes and linear open spaces enabling the public to travel by non-motorized modes
throughout the Dublin community.
Guiding Policies
2.1 De-emphasize reliance on the automobile for transportation by encouraging the development of off-
Goals and Policies I kF City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 20 15 47
street paths linking community amenities such as parks,schools,open space areas,nearby neighborhood
amenities and other destinations.
2.2 Identify desired trail alignments in advance of development and work to secure trail easements or
dedications, and develop trails in conjunction with development.
2.3 Integrate trails with natural landscape features such as creeks and ridgelines.
2.4 Encourage joint agency cooperation in projects to promote and develop trails.
2.5 Designate trail right-of-ways that are wide enough to accommodate the designated uses, that provide
a buffer between the trail itself and adjacent development, and that allow for both emergency and
maintenance vehicles.Trail rights-of-way can occupy the same easement as emergency and maintenance
vehicle access and utility easements.
2.6 Designate wider trail corridors wherever possible to include sensitive resources,unique natural features
or vista points and to provide design flexibility.
2.7 Provide staging areas located on arterial or collector roads that are both convenient to the public and
that are easily accessible for maintenance and operation purposes.
2.8 Evaluate all utility rights-of-way for trail development potential.
2.9 Where possible, provide links to regional trails proposed in the EBRPD and LARPD Regional Trail
Plans, the Pleasanton Trail Plan and the Dougherty Valley, San Ramon Westside and Tassajara Valley
Plans.
Action Program
2a. Encourage the development of a trail along Tassajara Creek by EBRPD.
2b. Encourage development of the EBRPD Calaveras Ridge Trail along the Calaveras Ridge Trail near
Donlan Point.
2c. Encourage the development of open space trail corridors in eastern Dublin as it develops.
2d. Consider the Altamont Landfill Open Space Fund for future site acquisition.
PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan goals outlined in this document, if diligently followed, will provide the
residents of Dublin with a system of quality parks and recreation facilities for years to come.
Implementation of funding sources will require extensive pre-planning efforts. In addition to utilizing existing
funds for park and playfield renovations, strategies for acquiring additional capital and operational funds need to
be addressed.The success in implementing this Plan depends largely on adequate funding,not only to acquire and
develop park land,but to cnsurc that the revenue needed to operate and maintain the facilities is always available.
The implementation chapter of this Plan examines the existing and potential funding sources available to
acquire, develop, operate and maintain recreational facilities. A successful implementation program will rely on a
48 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 141 Goals and Policies
-
combination of regulatory mechanisms,public and private funding sources and innovative and creative approaches
to accomplishing park, recreation and resource objectives.
GOAL 3: Generate the necessary funds and utilize land dedication policies to insure implementation of
parks and facilities acquisition and development.
Guiding Policies
3.1 Emphasize the acquisition and development of facilities that serve the community.
3.2 Continue to implement and update the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Public Facilities Fee Program
with regard to the dedication of lands for park and recreation purposes to insure that it keeps pace with
land costs in Dublin.
3.3 Explore options to address park land acquisition, improvements and operation expenses beyond the
minimum established by the Subdivision Map Act for park dedication. Opportunities may exist during
the negotiations for Planned Unit Development rezoning, the Development Agreement Process, and
review of tentative maps for General Plan consistency.
3.4 Continue to explore inter-agency agreements and joint-control agreements to implement park
improvements.
3.5 Explore the variety of techniques for providing parkland including dedication, acquisition with Park
Facilities Fee funds, easements, and partnerships with other agencies.
3.6 Consider developer-built parks
Action Program
3a. Monitor the Public Facilities Fee Program to ensure that sufficient fees are collected for acquisition and
development of parks and facilities.
3b. Continue to actively pursue State and Federal grants to develop park facilities.
3c. Continue to implement park facility improvements as funding is available.
3d. Pursue opportunities to jointly develop recreation amenities with the Federal Government on Camp
Parks land.
PARK DESIGN, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATIONS
The City of Dublin will continue to face the challenge of meeting increased demands for parks, facilities and
services with disproportionately less available funds. Limited resources, including energy and water supplies and
their associated costs compounds the dilemma. Maintenance is integral with planning in the development of
community recreation facilities of all levels and uses. The City's challenge will be to provide direction, services
and management for the existing parks and facilities while planning accurately for the recreational needs of an
expanding community. This will require developing an efficient system of operations and maintenance which
capitalizes on cost effective, resource conservative methods.
Goals and Policies 41 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 49
Development of sufficient funding and staffing for operations and maintenance is critical to the success and
longevity of the City of Dublin's parks and facilities.
GOAL 4:Provide planning for asset allocation,services management and funding for the existing parks and
facilities while developing a thorough list of the recreational needs of the Dublin community:
Guiding Policies
4.1 Continue to develop an efficient operations and maintenance schedule to reduce costs by implementing
preventative maintenance procedures and contracting specialty services through a competitive bidding
process.
Action Programs
4a. Explore and identify new funding sources for maintenance and operations of proposed facilities.
4b. Work with property owners of the remaining undeveloped parcels with parkland identified in the
General Plan to create landscape districts to fund future operations and maintenance.
4c. Continue joint use agreement between the City of Dublin and Dublin Unified School District.
4d. Utilize, where appropriate, organizations such as California Conservation Corps and neighborhood
groups to augment full-time maintenance personnel.
4e. Evaluate water management practices.Conduct water auditing evaluations at each park and recreational
facility and encourage water conservation in irrigating and landscape design.
4f. Provide adequate storage at all facilities to promote efficient operations and maintenance.
4g. Explore joint agreements with public agencies to combine resources in maintaining public facilities.
4h. Utilize recycled water to irrigate parks where available. Design park systems, plant palates and soil
composition to respond well to the use of recycled irrigation water.
50 City of Dublin DRAM Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 * Goals and Policies
City of Dublin
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
2015
Chapter 4
IMPLEMENTATION
OVERVIEW
The goals,guiding policies and action programs established in this Master Plan represent an ambitious plan. The
plan, however, reflects the desire of the residents of Dublin to have and maintain high quality parks and recreation
facilities. This desire for quality attracts people to live and work in Dublin, and provides a drive to enhance and
preserve that essence as the community grows.
The goal of this chapter of the Master Plan is to identify implementation priorities and funding mechanisms along
with the key points related to the cost of development and operations.The successful implementation of the Master
Plan is contingent upon acquisition of land as well as funding for development, operations, and maintenance of
the new facilities. An aggressive campaign combining sources of funding will be required to maximize funds to
fulfill the objectives of the Plan.
The challenge for the City will be to continue to use available regulatory tools and to develop new and creative
methods for financing the planned facilities. The experience of other communities shows that a combination of
regulatory, public and private funding is likely to be the most successful approach. The Master Plan addresses
park and facility needs through build-out of the City. Financing strategies, like the Master Plan, should remain
flexible to respond to the changing statutory requirements and opportunities that will impact sources of funding
over time.This should not,however,limit planning and development of strategies to finance these public projects.
FUNDING MECHANISMS
Funds from a variety of sources, including the City's General Fund, Grant Funds, and Public Facility Impact Fee
Funds have been allocated for capital improvements for various park and recreation facility upgrades, renovations
and developments through the 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program. In addition, there are parks projects
totaling approximately$102 million dollars for which funding is not currently available.
When considering the funding responsibilities for parkland acquisition,development and maintenance,a number
of funding opportunities are available to the City of Dublin.There also exists a number of regulatory mechanisms
that should be considered in the City's long range implementation plans.The major funding sources and regulatory
mechanisms include:
Implementation '. City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 51
• Public Facilities Fee
• Land Dedication
• General Fund
• In-Lieu Fees
• User Fees
• Grants
• Cooperative Agreements
• Bond and Tax Measures
• Donations and Transfcr of Ownership
• Individuals, Business or Non-Profit Foundations
• Innovative Land Acquisition and Development
• Landscape and Lighting District
• Special Assessment Districts
• Mello Roos Districts
• Open Space and Conservation Easements
• Transfer of Development Rights
• Restrictive Covenants
• Performance and Speciality Zoning
• Planned Unit Development
Each type of financing structure has its own advantages and disadvantages relative to the specific type of project
and available resources. In the past, the City has either utilized, or considered, many of the above sources.At the
time funding is identified, consideration should be given to financing projects by using a combination of various
statutes and financing structures. Financing methods requiring voter approval must be planned far in advance to
ensure sufficient time to mount a public information and voter campaign for successful passage of funding options.
COST OF DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS
Construction Costs
The actual cost to construct the facilities identified in the Master Plan will be contingent upon a number of factors.
Among these are:
Site Conditions: Until a final site is selected, the actual cost to develop the site will not be known.
Design Criteria and Specialized Materials: The facilities development plan calls for the construction of quality
parks and buildings.Experience has shown that the investment in high quality materials and systems has significant
lifecycle cost benefit. By using materials and systems that extend serviceability and reduce maintenance over the
life of a facility,the result can be significant savings in maintenance costs.
Land Acquisition: The cost of land acquisition must be considered when determining the overall development
cost. The cost may vary according to location and whether it is for a community or neighborhood park.
Furnishings and Equipment: The total project cost will be impacted by the actual furnishings and equipment
selected.Again,lifecycle considerations will be an important criteria in making the final selections.
Date of Construction:The actual date of construction of the parks and community facilities will have a significant
impact on projcct costs.
52 City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 rF Implementation
Operating Costs
The cost for maintaining both park land and community buildings represents a significant on-going financial
commitment. The public's demand for these facilities leads to intensive use which in turn, impacts maintenance
costs. Many factors will influence operating costs, including programs, environmental conditions, hours of use,
utility costs, and source of labor, to name a few. A business plan should be developed for each capital project to
identify the ongoing subsidy to the City and total estimated cost over the estimated life of the asset.
Potential Revenue
Many factors will influence the actual amount of revenue generated by the facilities. Induded among these factors
are the number of fee based programs and services offered, pricing, marketing efforts, cost recovery objectives,
prioritization of use and rate of community growth.
Implementation City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 53
This page intentionally left blank.
City of :Dublin
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
20I5
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 I Regional Location Map 3
Figurc 2 I Population Structure Comparison(City of Dublin) 9
Figure 3 I Existing and Future Parks, Facilities, and Open Space 25
Figure 4 I Existing and Future Schools and Public Lands 27
List of Figures J' City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan—May 2015 55
This page intentionally left blank.
City of Dublin
DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
20I5
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Park Standards 16
Table 2 Outdoor Sports Field/Court Standards 17
Table 3 Facility Standards Per Capita 18
Table 4 Existing Community Facilities Inventory 19
Table 5 Existing Parkland Inventory 21
Table 6 Park Amenities 23
Table 7 Future Parks and Open Space Inventory 24
Table 8 Park Facility Distribution 30
Table 9 Bridging the Gap—Identifying Future Potential Acquisitions 31
List of Tables 's City of Dublin DRAFT Parks and Recreation Master Plan— May 2015 57