HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.2 SB 343 September 22, 2015
OF D(//3 U��f�
1 —0 82
w
SB 343
Senate Bill 343 mandates supplemental materials that have been
received by the Community Development Department that relate to
an agenda item after the agenda packets have been distributed to the
Planning Commission be available to the public. This document is
also available in the Community Development Department, the Dublin
Library, and the City's Website.
The attached document was received in the Community Development
Department after distribution of the September 22, 2015 Planning
Commission meeting agenda packet.
9/22/15 Item #8.2
Debra LeClair
From: Danielle Diaz
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 3:26 PM
To: Debra LeClair
Subject: FW: Time Sensitive Message for the Planning Commissioners
Attachments: jr_student_generation_table_9.8.15_-_demographic_study_2014-15_backup from Sept 22
meeting.pdf
141 Danielle Diaz
Office Assistant II -Community Development Department
City of Dublin
DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA 94568
C A l OR N i, (925)833-6656 1 (925) 833-6651 FAX
THE NEW Danielle.diaza,dublin.ca.gov 1 www.dublin.ca.gov
AMERICAN
BACKYARD Mission Statement:The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure
environment, and fosters new opportunities.
From: Amy Miller [mailto:amymillertrustee@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 3:20 PM
To: Danielle Diaz
Subject: Time Sensitive Message for the Planning Commissioners
Dear Ms. Bhuthimethee, Ms. Do, Mr. Goel, Mr. Kohli, and Mr. Mittan,
I am writing to you today to express my concern about an item you will be discussing at your meeting tomorrow
night. Unfortunately I am unable to attend as the school board has a regular board meeting at the same time.
As you are all aware, Kevin Fryer's request to have the 150 additional homes he would like to have vested as a
part of his project, will be coming to you Tuesday night. I would like to give you some perspective about why
its important for this project (unlike the last 3-Trumark, Jerry Hunt (aka the Green) and the Promenade) to be
approved.
We at the DUSD have been working very hard with the city and the developer to come to an agreement so that
we are able to build a K8 school in this development. We have spent countless hours meeting, consulting with
our lawyers and planning so that this school can get built. I'm sure you're sick of hearing about how the state has
failed us, but it is the reason we are in this situation. We never thought for a second we'd be having to pay for an
entire new school until recently. The Governor's decision to stop funding school construction is only a couple
years old. We unfortunately never new this could or would happen. Thankfully there will most likely be a ballot
measure in 2016. But until then, we are working hard at finding solutions for our community.
We cannot purchase the land set aside for us by Mission Valley, which by no means is their fault. We have
come to an agreement with the developer and city to acquire the land on Central Pkwy for this school and have
also found the means to build it. Most of Kevin Fryer's project is in fact already vested. The difference these
150 homes will make is insignificant due to the trade off of getting the school site, collecting another $1 on top
of the developer's level 2 fees and the agreement of the developer to make all of the street improvements needed
on the new school site.
1
I am asking you to consider voting to give the council a chance to discuss the project's merits and the hard work
and many hours that have been devoted to finding an agreement that works for everyone. I know more homes is
not what the residents want. But do they also want to face the alternative? We will be forced to look at boundary
changes, diverting students (hundreds from East to West) and possibly placing portables on Nielsen to house the
kids that are coming due to all the vested properties that will be built regardless.
Here is some info for you to digest:
If these units get vested he is still building 65 less homes than what is in the original plan. He originally planned
for 964, of those 749 are already vested and he is asking for 150 more (unvested), which totals 899. That is 65
less units than originally planned. And while we all know that the medium density may bring a few more kids
than high density, the difference is somewhat insignificant in this case since we will have a school. Although I
understand the interest in stopping all unvested properties, this is not a good idea on this particular project.
MOST of his units are vested and he will build them no matter what. So,the 749 units will come and we will
have NO school because the city cannot give us the land if those units are not approved. I do know that a large
contingency of residents concerned about the development on Parcel H, would like to see their view preserved
(by not allowing two-story or higher homes built-something I recently learned).
Please, I urge you to at least agree to allow the city council to take the matter up. We will be there (my board
and Dr. Hanke), to speak about the process we've been through regarding this particular project and why we
support it.
Thank your for taking the time to read this long email. I have attached some documents I think you might find
interesting. Please don't hesitate to contact me anytime with questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Amy Miller
Amy Miller
President,Dublin Unified School District Board of Education
Vice Chair,Alameda County Commission on the Status of Women
925-577-5866
2
ii +_,
ca c v
m
v -3
0 4
V)
N (n
4-.+ a--+
c.l -0 00 N O0 0 ch r—I
= Y
(n (/)
CD
F'- " _
N 2
^N
_ L 0
£ p L.n Ln r o
N N
00
N _o 0p0 m CID
Op0 oa
D QL Ln 00 Ln U
4" 4-+ (9 dl (NI Ol
N Q V) I.n r-i (/') Ln —
_c (1)
Tr Tr
cn
I� N N h
ca
CC
C
co tan
co E an
�0 = =a =
a a) a -
CV a,�
I 2 ° 2 = I °
G1 .= N C
dA
1STR! L C — M al= 0
Z V O 0
Z
GC H
(vn . Gcoo ,
Dublin Unified School District Preliminary
Demographic Study,2014-15
Elementary School No.5
Unit Planned To Build ' K-5 Buildout K-5 Remaining
Development Project Density Units Units Medium High Medium High
Fallon Village(Croak) Low 469 469 218 251 218 251
Fallon Village(Croak) Medium 130 130 49 56 49 56
Fallon Villages(Anderson Property) Medium-High 108 108 20 23 20 23
Fallon Villages(Branuaugh) Medium 67 67 25 29 25 29
Fallon Villages(Chen) Medium-High 100 100 19 22 19 22
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch 2)MU Medium 115 115 43 50 43 50
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch 2)N5 Medium 56 56 21 24 21 24
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch 2)N6 Medium-High 109 109 21 24 21 24
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch 2),Ardmore N2 Medium 111 111 42 48 42 48
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch 2),Capri N3 Medium 94 94 35 40 35 40
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch 2),Trio N4 Medium-High 126 126 24 27 24 27
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch),Mariposa Low 85 0 40 46 0 0
Fallon Villages(Jordan Ranch),Windwood Low 168 55 78 90 26 29
Fallon Villages(Righetti Property) Medium 81 81 30 35 30 35
Original E5 School Site Medium 105 105 39 45 39 45
Jordon Ranch Parcel H Medium 45 45 17 19 17 19
Total,Elementary School No.5 1,969 1,771 721 829 629 723
El
Capacity Analysis TK-5 6-8 Buildout 6-8 Remaining
TK-5 Enrollment(2014-15) 0 Medium High Medium High
mi
TK-5 Capacity(2014-15) 950 E5 323 371 I 282 324
Surplus!(Deficit) 950
K-8 Buildout K-8 Remaining
Medium High Medium Hi h
K-8 1,044 1,200 910 1,046
Notes:
E5 attenance boundary is preliminary the area East of Fallon Road and South of La Vina Street.
Preliminary Elementary School No.5 As of 8/21/2015
Dublin Unified School District
Demographic Study,2014-15
Student Generation Rates for New Housing
Housing Housing 14.15 K-12 , Current K.
Development Project Density Units Students 12 SGR SGR New Housing
Low Density Housing
Dublin Ranch(Area Al) Low 110 85 0.773 High 1.000
Dublin Ranch(Area A2-A5)(Signal Hill Area) Low 265 240 0.906 Medium 0.870
Dublin Ranch(Area A6-A7)(Bent Tree Area) Low 187 188 1.005 Low 0.739
Dublin Ranch(Phasel) Low 847 902 1.065
Dublin Ranch F2 Verona(Pulte) Low 121 104 0.860
Positano(Biella,Cortona and Livomo) Low 238 184 0.773
Positano(Fallon Ridge) Low 56 31 0.554
Positano(Fiorano) Low 43 40 0.930
Positano(Salerno) Low 120 64 0.533
Schaefer Ranch(Ridgeline Drive) Low 105 34 0.324
Medium Density Housing
Dublin Ranch Area F South(Sorrento 1 Milano) Medium 75 50 0.667 High 0.804
Dublin Ranch Fl Sonata Medium 119 106 0.891 . Medium 0.700
Tassajara Meadows Medium 206 142 0.689 Low 0.595
Medium-High Density Housing
Dublin Ranch Area F South(Sorrento 2 Trevi) Medium-High 117 30 0.256 High 0.368
Dublin Ranch Area F South(Sorrento 3 Firenza) Medium-High 66 29 D.439 Medium 0.320
Dublin Ranch Area F South(Sorrento 4 Siena) Medium-High 64 27 0.422 Low 0.271
Dublin Ranch Area F South(Sorrento 5 Amalfi) Medium-High 96 10 0.104
Dublin Ranch Villages(The Cottages) Medium-High 200 116 0.580.
Dublin Ranch Villages(The Courtyards) Medium-High 281 77 0.274,.
Dublin Ranch Villages(The Terraces) Medium-High 626 121 0.193
Dublin Ranch Villages(The Villas) Medium-High 289 89 0.308
High Density Housing
Archstone Emerald Park High 324 149 0.460 High 0.172
Amador Lakes Apartments High 555 55 0.099 , Medium 0.150
Avalon at Dublin Station 2 Apartments High 253 18 0.071 Low 0.128
Avalon at Dublin Station Apartments High 305 32 0.105
Avalon Dublin Station Apartments High 205 51 0.249
Cottonwood Apartments High 248 48 0.194
Elan at Dublin Station Apartments High 257 42 0.163
Emerald Park Apartments High 368 86 0.234 -
Ironhorse Trail Apartments High 177 31 0.175
Park Sierra at Ironhorse Trail Apartments High 283 60 - 0.212
Park Wood Apartments High 224 48 0.214
Springs Apartments High 174 44 0.253
Waterford Place Apartments High 390 36 0.092
...
Ir. i ._
I'M
a_ . :. .4: c:,
F1.■..I
§ 4c.
F f.
3 a I
.9 ? -•1
S3l1el3c1021c1A3-11VA NOISSINI •
VIN?:10ArVO WilenG M HONVel NV02:10r
—— -- - -
-,•,-- -—--w-77,---7,c-" -g."74."-"--, `--r4-77:-. _, _ ,. ....-,...,_.._,:t. Q Ihe , ..: „-. Ailit,1)
. 4& IP*a a..., • , i. _
'4•Z\ ., • st •• .,le i 4:Ell:.+:1 I Et 1 „,
.,E'N!
.1.14 .4 3 iza;,, ■ I) .., ,
' .."' i 1 41 •' Ativ
,.„....• ,. ,:,
,........ t' i
bf-L,
I r E„ 3 ii
,t,,,), k, / ,,,,. - '• I zeti 3 Mill-011i2. :.1 :1
3.0110 . 44*;# n.' I •.1.. "44 4 .46-41[464t ,=.-- -`,2,
, ,I 1. ,41;,
`V") \• 4 , .
kv ,,,,,, ‘ ,,,,, 4„,,_. J I.. ?:'
i
I 'S•c( / \,.,4‘ , \
„,\ ` „.-
‘ i 1 it 4,;,64.7.;.". / \s • ' \
.7 ' I P, '`*°. era.
a
.....4. .
i ' '' -/ ‘-'-` • 3-t, \, i' ,L. i( „ill 4`,'
az .
NsVi";11.1 I ' e 2 •
AL:, („,„..1 k....“\ z \S . sti, ,..kr•,,,..t.,'4%--. „*"....1 ' 1" D
\ . 'N,,• •‘'3%,47 ..NiZt* , .4., i , •• ,
''''.-^v * 4•C!"it....r•-•• •' • 4fr• ' 3.' 0 +
U ,.
1._.
g"'•-:, .. ;
, I.-- '1...- 1 •s V s '
.r. , I--- ,,' .ir-,1 Li • . . - ‘ sl?,,z1 ,1, '44,,,,i,
........',,
A... ' 4--. ' ' ' \'`• ' .' 1:: L.. C.;. 'fr, ti,
A.
f..-.0 :P--4 k “.1.. v{ ■ 0....I:1 'N,.., H",' d__t ,,,,
t.,.., IL-di I.- •jk.7. I 1.«.I ' 1,„_,, t.... t-1 Z ••• «
• b'ti Lt f ' ' 3 ,',...i--1- -;,',
Ill
CL
Lei. ' 0
d,
. , Ari:. '1_ .
, 1 - I ,. ' , LI . $ '
44 -i , ;, I-- , I «1
■ i• / ,
4
z
..i.,
-1'. i. .. : ,.,I ' LI IL L- I iej - '' '
,1 ,1 ■CAliiipl. 2...,. t 0
ti-■L ... ..-' 4'.. ,L.':
4 ..,-,1 ,{—. ', „901 05. 4 ,
.„. ,i,,,,,„:p°1_,„, --- — • ` , I 4 i *
• > 4, -.A---. .---,----- - 1,i .1 ,f1 F4,
,, , 4•""; IA 444.04 41 h.. 4 ,
i _. _ - . .ti',,,..1)V11_1)._ _P , . v: I, — ----
_•4_,„_,t-t-.4.-.. :4Y....V,..,' '
.', , - • "'w -- - —7--.r..- -_---
‘,..„----
Alk girl*.
414
11
. -
y..
/ . \
Li„,,. . --,,y i )i '
(
'MAP :-.:4„:±74114170›,11 , Alf' / - - 4. -.
_ ., , ,,..,. .,....:.
, . io 111 -g .4- li "ftV
Vt. -
, ' ' 4 .1... . k ' - -- .:-
•.
,_ w, . ,,. , :it
1 i - ‘4,f• (-.•. i 3
. `1•4' ii •4 dic . /X 1 X i;. • '... i,fl
.10 `A,.
• 2. ,. 1.,61, „,- - . 1 , , Ilt ■ - i :- 1 • ..?
1 *• - ‘ fl ';' '', '' ,
_ -
, . f 4)• '
• ------, • '''''
it'; I - , _ .., .... 1 ■
s '. ..... ..' •Jr - ,,4 taiirtr#*
..r
_ ,
I
1p�111 ii s
J
e 1 Ia
S311213dOild A3'I'MA NOISSIII m R
•f o2 g
W3`Nl ern N1 113SVHd HONV2� Nva?io * R Z Q
W N F F
N W Z
D N w w O
0 N
0 p t-
Z f-
N to
5 0 0 0 u0 0 L 8 W
D'>-:: 0n0 ^0 0 QO 30 00 0 0 22 Z -U
V
—10 J (n F
Z u-co a-co Wm -1m m cc 0 oz oc LLm rm
>''
fm a
OO�L2 00 00 tj0 d0 -0 °0 0= W _g= 7w t
a i NUJ Ow j W LLJ h W 8w N� 0� �K K
Q- in v UZ t/)Z A MZ roZ Z V6 d
- _ I-1 — I
p-- --- - .\-- -- L s --
i _,_,,. r I
■ It .owe. 0.,,
L•"•!t I it.
$ it
% Q& !
Jeff Baker
From: Marlene Massetti <daveandpb @sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:19 PM
To: Planning Commission
Subject: Fw: Deny the Jordan Ranch Project
Commissioners Goel, Bhuthimethee, Do, Kohli and Mittan:
I understand Jordan Ranch is on the Planning Commission Agenda this evening.
Unfortunately, I'm not able to attend. However, I hope there is something you can do
in support of the community in your position as Planning Commissioner.
As you know the community does not support any more residential housing until we have
the infrastructure to support them, including schools. There are 8787 units planned for Dublin
and over 5,000 of these units are vested and under developer agreement. Therefore, we
are unable to make any changes, effect any change, except for those units that are non-vested,
including Jordan Ranch.
As a Planner you understand the number of car trips per day that will be generated by each of
the residential projects planned. Thousands of trips daily will further increase the traffic congestion
in Dublin; on Dublin Blvd. At build-out our population is projected to increase by 25,000 more
residents bringing our total population to 75,000 with some projecting 80,000! Our city can not
continue down this path, as it has, with no regard to the consequences. The residential projects
proposed offer nothing in return to the community. Most fail to provide parks for children to play,
have insufficient parking to support units and lack trees and open space. In short, they contribute
to urban sprawl with nothing but concrete structures as far as the eye can see.
We are quickly losing the quality of our lives in Dublin and hope as a Planning Commissioner
you can, within the scope of your position, do something to change this course.
Please deny the Jordan Ranch project before the Commission tonight!.
Sincerely,
Marlene Massetti
Dublin San Ramon 7051 Dublin Boulevard phone(925)828-0515
Services District Dublin,CA 94568-3018 Fax(92.5)829-1180
Water,wastewater,recycled water www.dsrsd.com
September 15,2015
Mike Porto, Planning Consultant
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin,CA 94568
Subject: Comments on Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for
General Plan Amendment/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment
For Jordan Ranch,Sub Area 3 and Wallis Ranch
Dear Mr. Porto:
Thank you for providing Dublin San Ramon Services District(DSRSD, District)the opportunity to review and comment
on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the General Plan Amendment/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Amendment for Jordan Ranch,Sub Area 3 and Wallis Ranch. This study analyzes the impact of anticipated small
changes to the land uses planned for the projects known as Jordan Ranch,Sub Area 3 and Wallis Ranch,all in eastern
Dublin. DSRSD has a significant role in the area to be developed by the Project. Our agency took note of the list of
environmental issues covered by the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. We have included our comments
below on the environmental topics that bear on our agency's responsibilities in the area of the Project.
Land Use and Planning
Generally,DSRSD serves as the potable water,recycled water,wastewater collection and wastewater treatment
utility for the area of the Project and surrounding areas. As the provider for these utilities,DSRSD is responsible
for the planning and development of the infrastructure necessary for those services. Our intent is to ensure the
infrastructure is adequately planned to meet the interim as well as the ultimate build-out needs of the area.
Specifically,the study analyzes relatively minor changes to the planned land uses for these three developments.
The sum of the changes affecting residential land uses is the planned addition of up to 40 dwelling units. This is a
relatively minor change from the land uses analyzed in previous CEQA documents including the 2005 Supplemental
Environmental Impact Review. DSRSD agrees with the conclusion on page 87 of this study that there would be no
new or substantially more severe significant impacts than have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents.
DSRSD is the utility provider for the currently developed sections of Dublin surrounding the Project. The
development of services for the Project must be done in a way that does not disrupt or eliminate the services for
the active portions of the City of Dublin near the Project. Those services are to remain ongoing throughout the
construction and completion of the Project.
Potable Water Supply and Service
Generally,the wholesale provider for the District is Zone 7 Water Agency. Zone 7 provides potable water to
retailers in the Tri-Valley area including DSRSD,City of Pleasanton,City of Livermore and California Water Company
(also in Livermore). Zone 7 provides wholesale water to the Tri-Valley area and regulates the withdrawal and
recharge of the underlying groundwater. Zone 7 prepares a Sustainable Water Supply Report annually. The most
recent Sustainable Water Supply Report should be used as part of the basis for determination of available water
supply for future water demand.
Specifically, DSRSD will provide potable water to the three Sub Areas of the Project. DSRSD agrees with the
Dublin San Ramon 7051 Dublin Boulevard phone(925)828-0515
- Services District Dublin,CA 94568-3018 fax(925)829-1180
Water,wastewater,recycled rote vmrsv.dsrsd.com
Mike Porto
September 15,2015
Page 2 of 2
conclusions of the study on page 108 that state future development allowed on the three Sub Areas would
incrementally increase the need for potable water in eastern Dublin,and the supply of water could be limited to all
users in the future during periods of water shortages.
Recycled Water Supply and Service
Generally, DSRSD provides recycled water service to sections of the City of Dublin around the Project. DSRSD owns
and operates a facility for recovering recycled water at its wastewater treatment plant at 7399 Johnson Drive in
Pleasanton. This is a potable water conservation element. An increase in the use of recycled water in the Tri-
Valley area has an impact on reducing the total potable water demand on Zone 7's water supply.
Specifically,as a condition of potable water service, DSRSD will require the Project to plan for and build a recycled
water distribution network for landscape irrigation in the Project area. DSRSD will be able to provide the recycled
water supply for the three Sub Areas of the project.
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Generally, DSRSD provides wastewater collection,treatment and disposal for the area of the Project. DSRSD
believes that current capacity at the wastewater treatment plant is adequate to serve the proposed Project. The
Project would increase the amount of treated wastewater leaving the Tri-Valley area. Disposal of treated effluent
from DSRSD's wastewater treatment plant is the responsibility of the Livermore Amador Valley Water
Management Agency(LAVWMA). LAVWMA currently exports secondary treated wastewater to the East Bay
Dischargers Authority(EBDA)interceptor pipeline for ultimate discharge to the San Francisco Bay via a deepwater
outfall. Water treated at DSRSD's treatment plant that is not converted to recycled water for landscape irrigation
is disposed of through the LAVWMA system.
Specifically,DSRSD agrees with the conclusions of the study on page 108 that state the demands of the Project will
not exceed the existing wastewater treatment capacity of DSRSD,and that no new wastewater treatment and
disposal facilities are required by the impact of the Project.
Thank you for notifying DSRSD of the upcoming Draft Supplemental EIR. Please contact me at(925)875-2253 or
Rhodora Biagtan at(925)875-2255 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
/14‘)
STAN KOLODZIE
Associate Enginee
S K/ST
cc: Rhodora Biagtan, Principal Engineer
Ryan Pendergraft,Junior Engineer
File:Dublin CEQA/Chron
H:\ENGDEPT\CEQA\DSRSD Response to CEQA Documents\City of Dublin\2015\Comments Initial Study and MND-GPA and East Dublin SP Jordan Rch
SubArea3 Wallis Rch 9-15-15.docx