Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 5.2 Motor Lodge Rezone C fg ,of f)ffJ3Cjff • 30 6500 DUBLIN BLVD, SUITE 100 ` (415) 829-4916 DUBLIN, CA 94568 AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: March 28, 1983 SUBJECT: PA 83-002 Motor Lodge Associates Rezoning EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis including Ordinance, Negative Declaration, and letter from Bedford Properties RECOMMENDATION: 1 . Open Public Hearing, Hear Public Comment, Close Public Hearing. 2 . Make the 6 findings indicated on Page 4 of the Pre-Hearing Staff Anaysis . 3 . Adopt the Negative Declaration 4 . Introduce Ordinance and waive reading. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: Motor Lodge Associates, the applicant, is requesting that a 0 . 9 acre portion of the former Liberty House property be combined with the existing Howard Johnson Motor Lodge site . The application would reclassify the 0 . 9 acre portion from Light Industrial (M-1 ) , and the existing Motor Lodge site from Highway Frontage (H-1) to Retail Business (C-1 ) . The applicant has indicated a desire to add approximately 80 rooms and would use the added property for parking and possibly recreational use . Other retail and business uses could occur on the property. The proposed rezoning is appropriate for the site and would be beneficial to the City. The site is suitable for retail business development . The surrounding properties are nearly ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. -5• ou 27 COPIES TO: Applicant all zoned Retail Business (C-1) . The surrounding land uses are predominately retail and business . Almost all of the lands formerly zoned Highway Frontage (H-1) have been reclassified Retail Business (C-1 ) . Additional information is contained in the attached Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis . The Planning Commission and Staff recommends that the application be approved. After the March 7 , 1983, Planning Commission public hearing, the Staff received a letter from Bedford Properties suggesting that a traffic study be prepared. Staff believes such a traffic study is not necessary and recommends that it not be required for this project. �s THE CITY OF DUBLIN P.O. Box 2340 Dublin,CA 94566 (415) 829-3543 MEMORANDUM PRE-HEARING STAFF ANALYSIS Meeting Date: March 28, 1983 TO: City Council u FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning - PA 83-002 Motor Lodge Associates GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT: This is a request for a rezoning to allow the expansion of the Howard Johnson Motor Lodge on land now zoned for Light Industrial (M-1) and to rezone the existing Howard Johnson property making the zoning on both parcels consistent with the surrounding zone : Retail Commercial (C-1) . APPLICANT: Motor Lodge Associates, 6 Blackthorn Road, Lafayette CA 94549 REPRESENTATIVE: Johnson Clark ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-1500-22-01 and 941-1500-19-01 LOCATION OF PROPERTY: The southern end of Regional Street PROPERTY OWNER: Parcel 1 - APN 941-1500-22-01 - Motor Lodge Associates 6 Blackthorn Road Lafayette CA 94549 Parcel 2 - APN 941-1500-19-01 - Peter Bedford 3470 Mt . Diablo Blvd. Lafayette CA 94549 EXISTING ZONING: Parcel 1 - (H-1) Highway Commercial Parcel 2 - (M-1 ) Light Industrial EXISTING LAND USE: Parcel 1 - Howard Johnson Motor Lodge - Commercial Parcel 2 - Vacant -1- SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE: North - C-1 - Bowling Alley East - C-1 - Restaurant and Warehouse South - Flood Control Channel and Highway 580 West - Flood Control Channel and Highway 580 SITE/ZONING HISTORY: S-421 - The Alameda County Planning Director u approved a Site Development Plan for a 93-unit motel and restaurant (Howard Johnson Motor Lodge) y - March 15, 1972 . -Y >; S-595X and C-3206 - In April, 1977, approval was granted to add 48 units to the motel . S-777X and C-3787 - In May, 1980, an additional 22 units were approved for the Motor Lodge . 5-600 - A Site Development Plan for the Willow Tree Restaurant was approved by the Alameda County Planning Director on June 23 , 1977 . 5-776 and C-3805 - Liberty House received approval to add a hardware and garden center on August 20, 1980 . APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Sections 8-48 . 0 to 8-48 . 9 of the Zoning Ordinance describes the basic land use regulations that apply to (C-1 ) Retail Commercial Zones . Hotels are permitted as Conditional Uses ( 8-48 . 2 ) . Site Development Review would be required ( 8-48. 4 and 8-95 . 0 to 8-95 . 8) . (H-1) Highway Commercial zoning regulations are contained in Sections 8-45 . 0 to 8-45 . 9 (M-1) Light Industrial zoning regulations are contained in Sections 8-51 . 0 to 8-51.10 . Conditional Use Permit requirements are covered by Section 8 . 94 . 0 to 8-94 . 7 . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The proposed zoning change was deemed to have no significant environmental impacts associated with it. A Negative Declaration was prepared on February 15, 1983 - See Attachment #1 . The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Negative Declaration at a public hearing on March 7 , 1983 . -2- NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the March 28, 1983 , hearing, was published in the Tri-Valley Herald and mailed to adjacent property owners . ANALYSIS : The applicant is requesting that a . 9 acre portion of the Liberty House property be separated from that land, and that the new parcel be rezoned from M-1 to C-1 . The request is also to :. rezone the existing Howard Johnson Motor Lodge site from its present H-1 designation to C-1. The applicant expects to add about 80 rooms to the existing motel and needs the . 9 acre parcel for parking and possibly a recreational use . Should the rezoning be granted, other retail and business uses could occupy both sites . The manner in which the new development occurs is governed by the Site Development Review process which, in essence, will assure that new construction is safe, aesthetic, functional, and protective of adjacent developments from traffic, engineering, and design perspectives . The central question to ask when analyzing a rezoning request is : Is the proposed rezoning appropriate for the site, and, will it create a net benefit to the City? The surrounding land uses are retail and business uses : a bowling alley, restaurant, shops and a warehouse . Two sides of the subject property are adjacent to a flood control channel and freeway. The site is quite visible from the freeway. Future construction will be assessed as to its aesthetic impact from the freeway, to assure that the site continues to present a positive image for Dublin, and to those passing by. The site is partially subject to noise of sufficient magnitude that, were new construction to occur within the areas with the highest noise rating, the new construction would need to be designed to limit the noise internal to the buildings . The noise level in 1977 was rated at above 65dbA. Hotel and residential noise levels from exterior sources should be limited to 45dbA interior to the buildings . Such a reduction is possible with standard construction techniques, should the proposed rooms be in the 65+dbA areas . Alameda County Flood Control has requested that they review future plans, and that surface runoff, not be permitted to enter the existing channel . These requests can be complied with when development occurs . Changing the zoning on the property will not, in itself, lead to any drainage problems . -3- PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission reviewed this request at its meeting on March 7 , 1983 . The Commission recommended (4-0 ) that the City Council approve the rezoning request as stated in the Pre-Hearing Recommendation section below. COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: The City Council needs to hold a public hearing on this request, then to act on the Negative Declarations, make a decision on the application, and then make findings to '. support the action it wishes to take . The motion on the action must include the findings . If the Council approves the rezoning, it must also pass an ordinance in support of that decision. (See attached draft Ordinance) . FINDINGS : 1 . The City of Dublin is in the process of preparing and adopting a general plan. 2 . There is a reasonable probability that the proposed rezoning will be consistent with the future general plan. 3 . There is little or no probability that the rezoning will be a detriment to, or interfere with the future general plan, should the new zoning ultimately be inconsistent with the future general plan, . 4 . The rezoning will not have a" significant environmental impact . 5 . The rezoning is appropriate for the subject properties in terms of being compatible to existing and permitted land uses, transportation, and service facilities . 6 . The rezoning will not have substantial adverse effects on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to property or public improvements . -4- PRE-HEARING RECOMMENDATION It' is recommended that the City Council : 1) Adopt the Negative Declaration; 2 ) Introduce an ordinance to approve the rezoning request and waive reading of ordinance; 3 ) Direct the City Engineer to adjust the lot line on the . 9 ac . parcel to coincide with the zoning boundary. Attachments : Draft Ordinance #1 - Negative Declaration ' Interim Environmental Assessment form plat map zoning map ltr from Bedford dtd 1/24/83 ltr from applicant dtd 2/23/83 ltr from applicant dtd 2/3/. 83 car parking regulations ltr from Bedford dtd 3/8/83 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE REZONING OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF DUBLIN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I A 4 . 69-acre site located at the south western end of Regional Street (AN 941-1500-22-01) , and a .9-acre parcel located at the south eastern end of Regional street (APN 941- 1500-19-01) as shown on the map labelled PA 83-002, Exhibit "A" , on file with the Dublin Planning Department, 6500 Dublin Blvd. , Dublin, California, is hereby rezoned to the Retail Commercial (C-1 ) District. A map of the rezoning is as follows : LTA/C z t,etR 00H�N t' 2 Zo pb�a �o lOy rn Ya^� �R�fy N Jd.=f I Lt1° pu0e,yc N 9l pd°d J ��0 fl C'/. '4 uca � F F�JfA�R LCD P-F" M07OR LODGEA ap,U�d ...�i-���1� :r r� �':•�i.:H•'.ir pi!'.' � �tK�41hIJ°;'� zln��t�N�J/J•t � :;f:':.r..r .ti��?.T/'P• L.c �,•d� -'� ANA _`` •:cb7::d;t N d �� I- SAL I �9� •:T. «S� ...CJ,i ;.J.}\::i ::4 •iri �\V M,0011 or af'rAc _ . tD tL•/ \ .`• j�L•J.12�/_d�f°.t/'`.. 'N d'!I!!Y[r!!' "ANSOt� .9� � ,ill ..I /_�x•[I 1IT i R�.z4N� �� a . •i:�;,+, r, lrr!on�i�.ldlY' ° I REZON/NC FROM ' !1/1%Mo wfxr Auu y LMY e/M!C!L I{I/LllJ �^y go �•/ TO C•/ FREE I1 .dM lA'!/NF AL1/CUTMEA? SECTION II This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty ( 30 ) days from and after the date of its passage . Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, it shall be published once with the names of the Council members voting for and against the same in a newspaper published in Alameda County and available in the City of Dublin . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin, State of California, on this day of , 1983 , by the following votes : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: Attest : Mayor By City Clerk THE CITY OF DUBLIN P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 (415) 829-4600 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR: Motor Lodge Associates - PA 83-002 (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. ) LOCATION AND PROPONENT: End of Regional Street, south of bowling alley and Willow Tree restaurant. M ciates .. Applicant and Owner of otor Lodge Asso APN 941-1500-22-1. .. Peter Bedford Owner of APN 941-1500-19-1. DESCRIPTION: Request to rezone 5 . 6 acres from (M-1) Light Manufacturing, and (H-1 ) Highway Commercial to (C-1) Retail Business . This will allow for the expansion of the existing Howard Johnson Motor Lodge by approximately 80 rooms and for possible addition of other retail uses . FINDINGS : The project will not have a. significant effect on the environment. INITIAL STUDY: The Initial Study is attached with a brief discussion of the following environmental components : Noise Impact Visual Impact MITIGATION MEASURES: Acoustic insulation and air conditioning within 65+dbA CNEL noise contours for buildings . Site Development Review of any new construction. PREPARATION: This 'Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Dublin Planning Staff, (415 ) 829-4916 . SIGNATURE: DATE: 2/1.5/83 Laurence L. Tong, Plan i g Director CITY OF VU5LI�t�1 . I IA pr ' NO � (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.) Based on the project information submitted in Section 1 General Data., the Planning Staff will use Section 31 Initial Study, to determine whether a Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report is required. >. _ - - = b "cornpleted by :'the'. A NN ING STAFF ,: : ... . .. .,.: :::.SECTION `3.:=.INITIAL`--STUDY: `tO .:% _ a t. - t.. i R Name of'Prolect or Applicant rk, r A: " ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING = Description of Project site beforerthe project, `including information on: topography; soil stability; plants and animals; Ilisfiori�al,rcultural, and scenic aspects; existing structures; and use of structures .2 r2yrce h I erX�e�n1t� CJ.XI�it2F 6,r `'I V� - rZ °�CCLS Description of surrounding properties, including information on:` plants and animals; historical, cvltu,�rq 1, and Genic aspects; type and intensity of land use; and scale or dev lopment. `ll. Teo _ I _. 6Y1>c� r� �r4r�cl S 'htugjbh fit, P-41 -HI evict L)+ --A CoHn-52c ^A hrl l� ecL�G�c�, •rr+ u-+1-h --l-I��� rV`xr�'r.tr r'- - clt�rri' CI�?�/ (�`{;,'YIC `�'< - Factual explanations of all answers except "no" are re-.. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS gvired on attached sheets. CX� � IP�PAG'i� SOLE OF IMPACT _ ' 1 NO QJALIIIFI) YES F 0 0 1 1.0 WATER 1.1 Flydrologle Balance Will construction of the project alter the hydro- logic balance? 1.2 Ground Water Will the project affect the quality or quantity of ground water supplies? 1.7 Depth to Water Tablo Will the rate of water withdrawol change the depth' ✓ j or gradient of the water table? r 1.4 Drainage and Channel Form Will construction impede the natural drainage pattern or cause alteration of stream channel form? 1.5 Sedimentation Will construction in an area result in major sediment / I I el influx into adjacent water bodies? V 1,6 Flooding Will there be risk of loss of life or property due { ' n floodin ? OOS�IFNT l IMPACTS SCALE OF 7�SPAC Q��P T NO QUALIFIED :' XES UM(NCWN NO ME, _._. ollolo 1.7'Water Quolity Does drinking water supply foil to meet state and ✓ '. I i federal standards? Will sewage be finale-Ivotely accommedoted and ✓ I 1 ttr1ea t ed? m ill receiving waters fnil to eot locril, 3t.-.'c and ✓ I I 1 c • 1 federal standards? , ;•r Will ground vroter suffer contamination by s•rfu e ✓ I f 1 or polluted water from seepn}s, intrusion o soft p a t <. adjacent water bodies ortfrom another.:nntiminoted o .lifer? .. ✓' r :1 I I .. I 1 .I 0 A R 2 I I 1 <•w i t nand dis crsior.of.)llu an s 2•] Air Pollution, - Will there be<generotio p F :I i - I. ✓. . ' red activities or in ro fir.ire Ms CIA! t relo ,✓ b project P I 1 P 1 I . .. �,;:.•,. �...,-- - Which still crrecd .. ..•;...:::. . :...,. ..,':.• . .-'.r,�..,. ands? .. .. Y p .... .. •:•. .... ... .. .. .. .. .< quality Will structure and terroin-impede p:e%•eilirc rrin-1 2.2 Wind Alteration `. . 1 1 flow eoising channeling along certain eorrN s-s or 1 I obstruction of wind movements? 3.0 EARTH ..::i";:.: .i;� ':'>.;: •....,.;.:,:..... _.. :.. I I I 3.1 Slope Stability Are there potential dangers related to slope failures? 3.2 Foundation Support Will there be risk to life or property .)c:a s:e of ✓ I 1 1 \ excessive deformation of materials? 3.3 Consolidation Will there be risk to life or property becaii;e of excessi•e consoiidotion of foundatier mntnriols? 3.4 Subsidence Is there risk of major ground subsidnn.:r.nssnciatcd V/ I with the project? 3.5 Seismic Activity Is there risk of damage or loss resiiltitsa from earth- ✓ I 1 1 quo!-c activity? t . 3.6 Liquefaction .. Will the project cause or be exposed!o lquefoction 1 I I of soils;M sTcpes or undr-r foundati-ns? .. . 3.7 Erodbility Will there be substantial loss of»il c!s�!o ern- - ✓ I I 1 struetlon practices? 3.8 Permeability l Will the permeability of soils ossociot:rl wish the f project present adverse conditionsrelotive tc de- velopment of wells? J i 3.9 Lhitque Features Will any unique geological features bn domajed or destroyed by project activities? 3.10 Mineral Resources Are there geologic deposits of potential warn rcinl ( 1 1 ;S value close to the project? 4.0 PLANTS AND ANiMALS r� '< Ara there rare or endangered species present? 4.1 Plant and Animal Species x Are there species pre_nt which are po ticolarly ✓ susc^_ptiblc to impact from human activity? ::•'; Is there vegetotion pr.sont, the loss of which-will ✓ deny food or habitat to important wildlife foccics7.-; ` Arc there nuisance :pecies of plor.t or n�imo:s for ✓ ;( ( 1 : which conditions will be improved by tFe project? e Are there on unusual o ulotions of innts that may lk 4.2 Vegetative Community Types Y P P P Y be of scientific interes t? / t, Are there vegetative community tykes which are ✓ I i ! particularly su;cep.'ibla to impact (rr:m Human cc:ivity? Are there major trees or major vcgr.tntiars that will I I ho cd•:c:rly nffr:r.tc-i by the;proi-cl? _ 1 A.rr, thc:o v= ::o:i.r. rnmmun-1y typ^s r-^-art. 11'r. Ir„s I 1 of which will deny fr.-s-1 or ho5;ta'In i'.•r n,'or.t v:i�dli%r. i I 1 species, or too:utistantial nu,,n. o.r m`i:7' 4.3 Diversity Is there substa s:inl diversity in th•:nrt••:n:rnr--ni:7 l ( 1 as reflected in the n,.m6rr and type of p!nnt o: species present or the three-dimcnsinrr.l ormngq rr^n: of plant species present? I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 corer �ACIS -c,=- OF DIPACT . . . NO QUALIKI D YES UNTIQiMN NO ollolo 5,0 FACILITIES AND SERVICES 5,1 Educational Facilities Will projected enrollments adversely affect the ex- Isting or proposed facilities in terms of spacing for all activities, including classrooms, recreational le. _ oreos,'ond staffing needs? ;•: Will the ro'ect impact►ha pupil/teacher ratio so I .r P I as to Impede the learning process? s+ Is the school located such thnt it preients o hardship •n F novel time I I . r portion of the enrollment r terms o t (o a par r j+; - - distance, or safety hazards? X - 5.2 Commercial Facilities = Will there be on inadequate supply of and access to commercial focilities for the project?, .' 5.3 Liquid Waste Disposal Are provisions for sewo-3e capacity inadequate For the needs of the project without exceeding quality t/ I standards? Will the project be exposed to nuisances and odors associated with wastewater treatment plants? 5.14 Solid Waste Disposal Is there Inadequate provision for disposal of solid 1 V I I wastes generated by the project? i there inadegsntc quantity or quality of water 5.5 Water Supply Is I supply to meet the needs of the project? 1 5.6 Storm Water Drainage • ' Will storm water droinoge be inadequate to prevent downstream flooding and to meet Federal State and V I I I local standards? 5.7 Police I Will tha project's additional population, facilities, or other f"tures generote an increase in police service or create a police hozord? t^ 5.8 Fire Will the project's additional population, facilities, or other features generate an increase in fire services 1VJ I I I -- or create a fire hazard? I 5.9 Recreation Will the project have inode•guate facilities to meet ✓ the recreational needs of the residents? I I I 5,10 Cultural Focilities Will cultural facilities 6e unovoiloble to the project residents? V 6.0 TRANSPORTAT ION 6,1 Transportation Facilities Are the traffic demands on adjacent roads currently / at or above capacity? if net, will the traffic'g `/ I eroted by the project cause the cdiocent roads to - reach or exceed capacity? Are the other transportation facilities which serva the / 'S project inadequate to accommodate the project's y ; travel demands? 6.2 Circulation Conflicts Will desig•s of tha pruiect or conditions in the surround- I I I �.. ing area increase accidents due to circulation conflicts. I '. 6,3 Road Safety and Design Will project residents and users be exposed to increased ;}S occident risks dun to roadway and street design.or lock E of traffic controls? 7.0 HEALTH c ✓ 7.1 Odors VlIII the project be exposed to or genorote any intense odors? 7.2 Crowding and Density Will the residents and users be exposed to crowding or ✓ I I I high dcn;ity in their physical living environment? 7.3 Nuisances Will the project be exposed to or generate factors that may be considered as nvisances? y I I 7.4 Structural Safety Will design and proposed construction techniques fail ( I to meet state and local building codes? 8.0 NOISE 8.1 Noise Levels Will the project be exposnef to rr generate advcrso ( 1� noise Ievnls? ( ( I !I 8.2 Vibrations Will the praicct bo expo;ed to vibrotinns annoying to I I t humans? • � I 1 I I oa RDO IT XMPACTS SCAM OF TMPACC NO QUALIFIED YES CJrIFQ�Otti',�1 NO 1 1 p � H of 10 9.0 COMMUNITY CHARACTER 9.1 Community Organization „' Will the project disrupt on existing$et of - I i._. =':•: orgoinizolion3 or groups within 16 con•munity? 9,2 Homogeneity and Diversity''• Will the project change the character of Iho I t community in terms of distribution or concentra hon rillof income, ethnic, housing, or age group?i • 9 3 Community SioSrLsty and Will the project bo cxpos_d to or generote on :I 1 `• .' Physical Conditions : '-•�„;; c�eo of poor stability and ph)fsical conditions? 10.0 VISUAL CILIALITY J t,. I I 1 f Vtews s Will resrdcnls of the surrounding area be adversely affected by view:of or From the project? residents be adveriel affected 6 l will the rojeet reside Y Y Is I I a� views of or from the surrounding nrca? ' 10.2 Shadows•,'. Will the project be exposed to or generate excessive , shadows? 11.0 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL ” RESCU. CES 11.1 Historic and Cultural Will 1}r project involve the destruction or alter J I I Resources ation of a historic resource? r Will the project result in isolation of a historic J J I resource from its surrounding environment? t Will the project introduce physical, visual, audible or atmospheric elements thnt are not in c!iaroctcr with ✓ J J J o historic resource or its setting? �.,.' 11_2 Archaeo!ogicol 5ites Will the project involve the destruction or alteration I :. I' ':I and Structures of an archaeological resnurce? Will the project result in isolation of on archaeological I I • resource? Wili the project introduce physical, visual, audible or atmospheric elements that are not in character with an archaeological resource or its setting? t 12.0 ENERGY 12_1 Energy Requirements Ara there potential problems with the supply of V J J J energy required for tine project? Will the energy requirements exceed the capacity 1 of the service utility company? Will there be o net increase in energy used for the I •}�_', project compared to the no project alternative? 12.2 Clsnservotion Measures Does the project planning and design Fail.to include• I ovoilab!c enemy con:crvntion min;urn.;? ' ... 13.0 LAND USE "., .,:•- = 13,1 Site Nozords Do conditions of the site, proposed site dcvelopnicnt, Y/ J or surrounding area create potentially hazardous situ- '�� ! ations? { ri 17.2 Ph;sicol Threat. �'/il! the project or the surrounding arr.•a ercntc o feeling of insecurity and physical threat omonj the residents 7 and users? I 1 13.3 Sanitary Landfill Wil! 'hc project be .xposn4 to S.trueturnl clmmnge, noise, air, or rufoce nrd ground water pollution J 1 r;r other nuivrn�r.;ass:sciorel with a snnitory londfill-rr 13.4 Woterways Will tlx:project affect on existing w_-terway through / I J I filling, dredging, droinrrig, eulvcrring, vo;tc dis- V/ chorges, lass of visual quality or otlior land u:c I CaMPONE gr 7MPAC`I'S SCALE OF 1MPACT NO QUALIFIED YES - UMXX',1 NO • - 1� 1 Io • o1 I0 . f - ..•.. _ _ I - �. •a� e ntr. t Co 'r Mme n � I he rE nv i on O t C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE QUALI � NO NO YES UNKNX3 N (1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish cr wildlife _species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below, self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate 'a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict ? the range of a rare or endangered plant or.animal L :. or eliminate important examples of the major periods or .California history or rehistor f - n 'al fio ochieve short - (2) Does the project have the pote t� r^ " term, to the disadvantage.of long-term, environmental goals? ... ' (3) Does the project have impacts which are individually ' • limited but cumulateively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) I4 Does the project.have environmental effects which will cause substantial adversa'effects on human .' beings, either directly or indirectly? ,' D. MITIGATION MEASURES- Discussion of the wa s to mitiga`e `��e significa t effects identified, if an y: � � I'lC�r t7� �� I t. �• p, hSuc(ZG�n ► tc +-t ©i� � �� - - 1 do vc.I�rt7r_I�, �r�hi -�- "T x•1.11.: V1ol�� ( u�C ..VC�st3, 1�1�xc.�' •. r�l�:,dv E. :DETERMINATION - On the basis o this initial evaluation The City of Dublih Y finds that there will, not be.any significant effect The par : characteristics of this project and the mitigation measures incorporated into _ the design of the project pro�id� `h�� tactual bo`sis for the finding-:A NEGATIVE 4 `= DECLARATION !S r SQUIRED. _ "•' =`.',.� The Ci of "PtAbtin finds that .the'proposed project MAY:have a si nificont effect �,. _ P P P I 9 on the environment:' AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED** ' Signafure and date: Name and title: :: �.. . h I "NOTE: Where a project is revised in response to an Initial Study so !ha` poi e:i`ial adverse effects are mitigated to a point where no significant environmental effects would occur, a - - - _ .�, � —, �� -� - ^- -�--:�-__ ...iii c... __,...__� .--•--� -� ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ATTACHED TO INTERIM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM 1 . 6 The site is adjacent to a Flood Control channel . Should it overflow some flooding might occur. The chance of this occuring is slight, however. 2 . 1 With the close ,proximity of Highway 580 , some potential for short term air ..pollution exists near the Highway, but no data is ' available: 3 6 No soils .report is available so we can not assess the subsurface conditions . 4 :2 :.::.,There :are, some ,.mature trees within landscape :areas . New construction could affect them, but that impact would be slight. 5 . 7 Some additional police service might be needed to provide security for .the motel. 6 . 2 Circulation patterns of the new construction are not known at this time . 8 . 0 Part of the land is within the 65dbA noise contour area and thus, depending upon the use and location of new construction, some accoustic insulation may be required. 10 .1 The property is quite visible from Highway 580 and San Ramon Valley Blvd. Buildings on site will also view these roads . Such views to and from the site should be considered during site development review. 11.2 No archaeological information is available . 12 .1 Design of buildings is not known and therefore, no energy data available. 4 . 9 9 i � I OSdpAP L✓ - o :� �� R�LJ.vG• ry. APNf N.r9j0 IB ' MI. G-I rn n XTA/L two, N�SaNIEIE PETER BEJ,r0.2,7 A 9�nCc gR AP ZD Im N UBLI G Cflo •\ S (nsnt.fe)•egEe eo�ofnvENr su(c./••/ao• APN 9f (1�' 55 0q �r C• 235 .. .. r yy1y � T�V F•yyltt��f I 1?F✓GL d A.r \ .t-MMW LODGs, A SLR/AYES^ 4Q ✓;" ,fl.rf� D Ef�, �P m- vN F -:•i.��.�. !.� \,t•?rdv.-. let N.IS,A�OS zp �.fpP lJ01 �. PA ArN ECJf. PP ^c!( no 5''c -,.-rry'wlyrWIr z eo (/OHN,70N CLARK +ds> ...r.. -1.:Yri s.,q:; Moot-' /•aWIfAC �9 �\ o 5j,rApf R0 a e PkbPOSEO REZON/NC f C F o L07-L/NE AO✓61Jr DENT RrAT �(•J.92• ,rd•rA ( •'N C/'Il if f'1!i' 70 ACC011o"r LEGAL 0Z,5a1PT/ON to J1d1 50A r N 7,[i14Y E'3 C/rl OF CV,-L/N, 1(A.NC64 4X*V7); C/L/faNN/A RZ4N �M WILLIAM 1.BU[x L ASSOCIATES ', r r.Yt alrAi!AdW' S!o o�swu+G u.W-[ns DESIGNED_ "PRWED; DRAWING NUMBER }�' I REZON//ERG FROM DRAWN -Y r F ZD¢A 7r,rnmo N'!9r co~,,RY LAN! �p0 ^A_/ TO C,./_ CHECKED - o',"eC0X ff o//M/C Z AFL/4W CC (/ /V/ / FREE pUA AM)lOT U.f/F Aa14F7,APENr h//-8li �.oZZ2 SHEET NUMBER REV. DATE DESCRIPEIDN BY "P DATE JDB N.. / o / . . .. ;�,. . u •>r�' •��' 182..• 16 Cw�ru�Rs�wN�_ . 2?o-...:' 16�9ot�1oN P.,Y• ?5 0 LL}U,tillTH�QAWI•l _ .. - .S90; .I pow;io>t of 15 ,z ?(0�7 Pq�noN-16,G.rrnttiRAwnr��_ . + Q ' 1754 19-Z � �' r 1286 _ -6 _.- _. • r ► -..13'78 Powro►a cr) 40 14 7 Io E %51 a'/8'( w N �c5 30�� Q 7 72-.004 . t r, fi 13-21 - Q 6� Gp 1 5-353 ]",TA V-123 S=Efi�X V-142.2'7O i .V-1s" - ' b"5-23z9� S- 24 Vii•�� , 1f-LF89z 5-687 Y-Z� � ,= v-sss7 `� ,vS-� Y-L526� Ys �• e = Y•67C9 /8 19_.5-559 ji- !\ y C750i p r:+try 4 �•,v if 5- y4�R R4 y `V, CM i ` ,•.. y1 : .. .. �T4 RirpH qq tole .Z :. �. w;�n ..✓1' '' bi4� '�/ i.± P1-1307 t ^ `� /'._ •,✓ A--boo/.3;��.' .. �j -cam;Yg :,o s. `a-363 C 2925 V-6373 .{ o• �''� � ;�.:1.._ ._, t-�j �l-619 l�- 3 O 1830•:..• (Fn1) f 3/ X32 /.l7dsf:600' rCCN0. ,. � "'%'•";: �C�. ./ i 1. ;• �_1,�.� '.j'•;r�.-, i., ,.. ,- '�c--33• . . .�.•;�-�` �-_ f�.��-- ••may' '._--- �•. •� `� t�e'S-'T'7..QX� • i - i•:. '^tea...-�•r• '•'`..,F C,�,V T. ,!�.r• l20).i i'%�!r� su FRE�14:4)- R - 19-006 us r V LL DFORD PROPERI,.;�S January 24 , 1983 e r.!.- Larry Tong CITY .'OF DUBLIN ; 6500 .Dublin ,Blvd. Suite 100 _ - .. Dublin, `CA < 94568 Re Parcel ."B" of Parcel Map 1307 Dear Mr. Tong: We would like to do a lot line adjustment to split off approximately . 918 acres from the southwest corner of Parcel "B" of Parcel Map 1307 . We want to sell the property to Motor Lodge Associates , a partnership, for expansion of the existing Howard Johnson Motor Lodge. We are also re- questing a rezoning to allow motel use on this . 918 acre parcel. Mr. Johnson Clark, managing partner for Motor Lodge Associates , will be handling the processing of this request on our behalf . ery your r e f r PBB/cz Bcdford Pruperties,Inc. M,ilini;:\ddmss 3470 Mt.Diablo Blvd. Telephone A Diversified P.O.BOX 1267 Suite 200 415 Real Estate Company Lafayette,California Lafayette,California 2838262 94549 94549 1 1 77z0t0r Zodcge 6680 REGIONAL STREET DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 94566 (415) 828.7750 February 23, 2983 Planning Commission City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. #100 Dublin, Ca. 94568 Dear Commissioners: We hereby request that we .be allowed to annex to the hotel property, the property adjacent to the Howard Johnson Hotel located South of the Willow Tree Restaurant and I-580 (as per submitted plan) and that the entire combined property (5.6 acres) be rezoned to C-1 commercial. It is our intention to add additional rooms to the Hotel and we will need more space. Yours Truly, Johnson Clark Managing Partner Motor Lodge Associates JC:lf R E C E D FEB 2 3 1983 DUBLIN PLANNING fi ' 1)1.0101' ZO d.9re • 6680 REGIONAL STREET DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 94566 (415).828.7750 i d February 3, 1983 a' Planning Commission j. City of Dublin Dublin, CA 94568 1 . Dear Members of the Planning Commission, ' Motor Lodge Associates, the owner of the Howard Johnson Motor Lodge and Spa, is purchasing adjcent property directly between the Willow Restaurant and I-580. It is our intention to add' approximately 80 rooms to the Motor Lodge. ` We hope to be able to add directly to the existing building. If this can be done, the acquired property will be used solely for parking with possibly some recreation facilities. The additional parking could also be beneficial to the Willows Restaurant. We can not submit a plan at this. time as all the contingencies, such as fire equipment access, have not been worked out.' :We would like, also, to submit for your cons.ideratiion a summary of parking regulations for various cities near Dublin. It is our observation that over 50% of cars parked in our parking area are of compact size. We-have also observed that our parking lot has never been full even while we enjoy 100% occupancy. As parking space is directly related to the number of rooms we may add to the lodge, we would like your guidance as to the percentage of compact car spaces we may install, not only on the new property, but also on our existing parking area. rVery truly yours, ..i Johnson Clark Managing Partner Motor Lodge Associates RE CEIVED FEB 2 1983 DUBLIN PLANNING OCTOBER 22, 1982 CAR PARKING REGULATIONS CONVENTIONAL COMPACT % S Fl CITY/CNTY SPACE SIZE SPACE SIZE COMPACT CONTRA COSTA CNTY WALNUT CREEK 9' X 19' 7.5. X 15' 50% CONCORD 9' X 19' 8' X 16' 50% F . 'PLEASANT HILL 9' X 19' 7.5' X 16' 50% LAFAYETTE 9' X 19' 8 X 16' 40% ALAMEDA COUNTY . 9' X 20' NONE Q or 10' X 18, LIVERMORE 8.5' .X 19' 8.5' X 15' 10% PLEASANTON 9'' X 19' NONE T, Si re g255, '7/ Can bc A v :i R E C E I V E Ci FEB 2 1983 PLANNING f B��FORD PROPS .11 t .. �•, .r , rr. ', I Aril ..s lzyl Ft rf JL ttd�1.#c f Yr I )t '. {G , � !' �., 1 'ir s r' , r r � l • r , ...r r tt�rl �/I.li �"I y'f 1Y (y t �L ^1 iY tr � [r{ r jr tC r: ! ' � r ' _ ��'' ' <� , �'- (',1 .r .,}r ri� ; trr .'_�r.,�. `/i r t.Y •t ! , rt u , ,<A r tr. 7 �y ,, ✓ r ,ih t Jr "f ! J{4 / }ur4 '''1` 1 � l J y/ � ) ' ' � , 8 r�rb AtY e,'r,J• t ,JYA {d' `4 't rfrt Y�i rir A r rA March( •, -1983 fit '�J b +,rM J.. y Jt /i/ °f. iry::.:�:(; .J_r t....1;:1 Y' )t���. �^(Y�'-1 i� � 4.•� f�•�t�e,r�J 't• (J'IT..r'Y -,'br:rCY..)h(" 4 r.'tri l - < 4(r.� ,fi l , -.r ,, -:�_I'y ' �i ti.�ryyrt tl ,Ai. rF tt>.t 't,7 ;�. { a.z„•s {'k Y"C t� iY 5.,�:Y.:'r.i j+ la�. f`L.r 7 �_ h i r !c -1 . { \i i ,.St ! 7,y; tl r,:jJ Jr F tY�^/t Y,?iY,{Ya�XG }FtJ,iL/ �. .✓YSf 1z 'AIJ�r TiL , r, �•'w �,y�sl Ytl i f r , r .�{\,4 rd- A ,i �✓ r pr �.t h1•�eijtll' !Y °j' r” .7 'CAl 4i Y•*r ��• 1� ASS,r(G Ir? � {.�F r vet t rl. Y1. A Lti Y4 '.. y try.�F7 t p"' f°3 .,• �a �� r':;��:�Mr urenceL.-1, n��Tong ���7rrc,�-ttrrf�,Itr44r,��.> �� "E>���� GIr�.Hr+9�St�n4Tj:yna* y.�}.e t•t 'gib 3 r ,� l, tJ t.!..,.-�r: - °5;h1 .1>:''tcs- '4'b;r`+c;..F up, w Arita ..rr5rr.;a;.,te•ir,7, � c i�`v:!P a ,°ir 't .z: ..> > t .i i qqryry ..1.;�� `cf' r'�'r:..�.�.q vy„ � ,;, } 4 J+t YLr:•.7hr,;ty n; +:��t:p1 s •s t )aJ.a t. I!�'f t .t c ,,, i) r � i r 1 '1.� ��� JtA PlanninQJ�Dlrector , itiz'rtlft-..y'T a, t�.��'t?J.r;� ��`i�"� >;.:i�l.�t�flrj�'tn•{fit y1ry ['v.rp1}.^' .-i >Ir, �-. t �,.. i try 1� )tl., }+�, i. h�uy...n�w,,f'.yj'},�C„� �,,.r.:fJ.��.... .;r.'f tl;>,.�'� qti�+�"t�y,'"t Y�t� -fix 1{ ✓• `ruF 2,.J. n-f r atiw ' t T ' tt ;`z r �u_.t, j z? , s's•/!r{} a) Arrf` rl u i � rn i fi ,.r 7;v�s`r�yrr'I�Z. ,YI � t ra t v{r t ij � r ,{t ...,,?,•.i_ 1,."V i,lc d, �, rat ,t. :.r f1'xstJti.s/ r wf Yftsr S! Fr;( �:s�{ r •Cr rltt , r.. t, Pr;, s'�.�/ yJi. '`� n�,?•f f( L it t{ �� Y7 ,. tY"t �trrL s'4 i�� t:c 3t � i s �� 7 ti • O .4B0}{�N23�4.0,.� r' tt}V l�ws'�'i' i �ik.�rr"rt rrbt.t5':v f ,\3r fi xi,.�i h ..r .� . Y�t�.�• ) ;. r lI',r�i Y t�.:'.'nitr,`;.r'^�,.lr,/r Y�r y! ,<t.n JY;�.,$I t r�v r,v\tt�1°r,?.,t:kYaf.r 7.'Y�.Y D rs,t��:ih{ui,.�,'•�'f}at br'�s1 ib�l r��r•,l:i���r�I�.�rii�J't'.((���y1.,r'.�1ttri�'';4'�CA ,r A_9_4,1.�,.t� Qi�.7.1••-3'�vr<if'i}1�i'+,1,1y7 itL:,1:s'�iL4��i1'r�.f yY�TS��.w t�A l.R:•r�v..n;�a t�b y.rn ka.' �s;.qS�lx�t if;'MI��.�.r}'l.>rl,,y��rr y�?.tr t,S'c 1 1 1 tii.r�!(t tA f�atn.�Yti�C(+.'y."}t L',1,F>}t'.'.ft_.;l{� ! �;L'Vt � •r. t•-. c.. •r�Prh- 1� <t.qAy!j ..u,3 � t U.A+��.t)l�. �,r o �;.zi, S l �,�'�•r .1� ) 7 r. y 7:. _Y i<., � }} Jx.4:._•4 .)•...,. .., ...•7f�� d•; / } �..,t. t�d•r1 ¢Y � iY:f�3t.r tl �L y .Y , iNegative Declaration.°for . otor Lodge Associates � ��� t J �f, � ,' s,�-;f `�}tl,�.'t s, t}s>�.�'.r7.;,<#X lyi���j3')�)r��'1:P:.rA.�..,{'�'y�'8..rf..b.rrt_a,,�r../ttE'.f�1,��i'rt �i�k�.-r xf.,y3yfily�-taad_;.x x�r'.d�ilJ.i�v. Cti tt 't - 1•^ 3 002 , .0 a v,.r. y 7 r' �..,Ly . .X l d ?” -.i1i�..X�,F r J. t '3 1 wj," +-t lt.! r s.a ft a•�. �1. y, It\ .r f , , �+;4 eiJ � it•&'¢ �;� -4ri`���°•� k•5f��7 5.� .�,}� R J a � <e Nt 6> ert t 7 qJ - f t� �,-.. R.•Ax /f '-i`�.r' !t t� a Ax r.Y,�y 7`c.r�l�f , Ott - •r't- .r` T etS t rs'{r �... f Is ,•t;,1 ,R Lr� � 't. { r t tit )t ti G t Dear �-Mr Tong 4 ',. �} t� f�.lfp .yl J�}.,•,F-1 Y r / � 1JlY �r�] I •'< � '�.. J'$•• ��tl ..r t.t r.}..: 4 j : • ' ' ,>`We "rc entl y,purc li ase e' d . the property known Y as `APN 9411500 •18/19 1 - x }the' AMFAC Y a t In acquiring ,this property;`,we were =advised .that AMFAC had a ` rr !`t-d ' contrract'to sell r'a portion of the property to }the Motor Lodge tes `'d'"- Assocla t,lat�'�„��, 3 1�r 'yi r,r tlai.'c�t{Hj t�.1r1,+77tf�''y S��:i�2 ftY�i�(• _ �s�r '., ttiJ t• r t..sFr ”' r x r il,_ 'i , _ ihfr�? .}4:. t,. , Therefore;` we /have inherited atransaction .which we are willing ti' � C ,::t•,irr �',f 3�t0 abide Eby ��I�Rtf s r.\ { .. ,, t+ ,ii T �.x�v r� �r�• �y vCJ� � *J y��t t7I ;�.. r 79r yLrrt na}� 'S t, ,, � } � >, r - t. '.R Sa '. t,. t -7c•,r 1s135sie)�R� •t ��,fs�,� r!. , However, ,tin all ,good consciousness we "do not feel that the use fr, propoGsedrrby Motor},.Lodge Associates;;would, � in any.. way,, create . good.;p lanning-development for the area in :question ryt :y1 Y :�, \L<. t Y or4. -, t..$ >.•i � r.x .j -q i "'re 1 d I <, -,.:1,;'� -p iii-,!k �}+ <p t.d'a)a a � '�' v s �i.'t -. }i.^f'?+ r��s. i'+P 'i.{rr ♦Fr.rt Y'f Y � J. ; 3 { y}.) r �., [I ,rv, solely dour, opinlonr;r�and,we i.n rio .way want s<to' obstruct r jany;tof <the Jrlghts�''of Motor ;.LodgeFYAssociates under , heir :previous J. �i �t�- � 'Y`i .t,'t s a P : � Y .' ' x�purcYiase ;contract '= rtx�We do snot;want y,;to have you tell: us that we :t. K' ! " .•re:.ul••.::++. .. Apr:u•,.at ,... .�;f,4 'tt�f>.�, ,.4 ,!t{,.Rarm7 d 4 'W'2 - _. -}.t 7 c t 4 a r. r '� `rf� ��';are `recommending:4your,re-zoning,aplans ,.1 zoning=APN .:9411500 . 18/1,9 L from H nd Ni-1,i to1C .;1 would - ,,; .. ac e:,a further burden;,on zthe ;already congested, traffic :flow on the"•­:Regiorial;;Street%Dublin-'Blvd area'`'leadirig to .eirculation conflicts''per,,:;section !6 .`2-,`:of: the City of ;Dublin .Environmental �. ;, •.' �Assessment'Form, `:Interim r , J 4 � EC: EIVED . � Y BAR i•a �9aa t DUBLIN PLANNING Y J Bedford Properties,Incy¢7Y tr . Mailing Address 3470 Mt Diablo Blvd. Telephone A Diversified ', P.O.Bo z 1267 Suite 200 415 Real Estate CCompany r u,° ` J t _ ', Lafayette California , Lafayette California 2838262 • , .._ LR\,Tr S,�N t 't sy rr t� ,�. t �� �M1 i i; 194549 , j'�` s `�t t ' !< 7� i ' 94549 _ S.i<t ir..t•ti+ti' r,L ..,.:.'.,.115..�r1�) t v,.�,w t1 _.Asy 5 .,Fl z t a It z r � l r 7 9t 4Is y : ;. >' ,,...2 r ti t �.r , ti r i ,JL t +, r 7 _ .. { , i 4 , t ,tr j r 1 i r , I r 1 . ,.J J7 `; ti Orr \,L 1 11`1 :iS \ ! ,. , t i ..°.r t t' t 1 t l > ',Id t ,1 { ! 1 f t. J' `„ i t ?w, t -,, ( f r 1 1 . Mr ;Laurence' L Tong 1 February 8 1983 ,;1 , 1C ` Planning Director r Page Two ,� ,r 'City<of Dublin ~r t `� 4 .� I V r l\ . . if t+ ! 1 1 r .. i` r -1-1 r l s t t a.I. tt� t `, t.{1 ( 'S_ , 1. i y;� ' ,_ t + f 3� y i 5 r'' .>'f.7l�Ihr rf t�'� {, C F� �,r}�1f` /•t. J t(i f )(rLi.. t , l { r 1, ,'J I yf 1 . 1 A j r Ai)' i.; {,1�t.�/n Y ' {i , `f Cl2t•Y h4:ri.1` y "t�+'7 r + ~ JtF 4 i r r' "I. St <? , 7 ,1){J 1t ..i ' a r ,. C , {f (r nn+ �,6 r L,YI r 3�. 4 ,i 4 i�v�ti 1; L ri: r,t�s i-,s,.,.Iq nl __ r rrt,',1 h rl, ,t$il St rat jJ1 1 4 -'' r.'.y ^.FttF?'L��,.__.1...­_­1.. 41�,.:'{ii Sr�l:C37l {t'-Y��1�,i'l.4)f'�r �.�y�'..{ Slt.Jl�r t, H,6­0'} 't '":i 4 � .f ttJlV l IV ql. tr 1t j,,.1. 'yf.11.171,f, , hNL11{�}.'t,A r.��tY"'.S,cr l,}e�.lstj�,{{. ;r,'.J+.,4jJ t,�;( kjt�i,';xi Ys bt Ia '� ...4 'i ,t TS.. ., i.1 t1 (t r `ir ;r... Erg:r r. ; t,e,.\. y«y..:.�'.. 1'-., .x. -t s;`I,,,!�t M n{k.•,l.�,Y�+.t sr.y7. .r"' r.irh >•yi< ..s' ,r,•,.t: a7f,5, :i1,.• �,:.r ?t 1 kit. .t 1.?;. ;t �.,s,f 1 .( 1 X36?• ,a t i « r a .< } t Zt?T( � .� a x , 1. yFr Sr,� t 't5 .r t. I CC t'•r•74 iii ti .-< s1.f1 r'tC �,�{,i�,,. Ja�L. 7�3, S r a.�1.? +�.;,'}t kl t," 17i' ' ,.r.. ;l t •1 , t3 1. -r 2•.' , < a. 1 •1 1,� i`^�`,: . 1 " . i 4.y i r {�t y u i�*`�rl hl:i S 1�,.s.v. t{ e.: U �.. + 1 <.'.? JY Ji.�u�' .t x,<, .z. V ti a : + ;; ! r �- h \t'� h 'N 1`},tN17 tn'ax'/ d''lfr�`I 'M't s .! �. 5r,, t1S 4 .tt r s t ul''t,. }rd t t- i 1 C. \a i; r.:' i ,. '7 apt , �i,�l.."'i"7..,v'iMany.tpotentlal Ktenants in `our,large building ' n APN 941- 'Y`= Ft,���,°x,1500-18 1 will require loading docks in` the ."south side ';of .S T J 1 sh•`�r�RSt n the 25building''and ''therefore, would greatly:;'increase the ,'t, h{gyp it}, Ere rn i ' ♦.t+ T a r 5 r ;r ; ' r tn,�sY traffic flow of large 7,trucks down the Regional 'Street `cul 'it1',t a ,r \Y a,,i�-e JhPx �1,+ .' S t . 1 Y t r ; •}C fr .4r at s1 _ _ -+; t r a g L , 1- s- t 5 tr Ij 4r1F A 17i. de SaC 6 gFttf . ' ,r . t * p , 4 y j3 rnLC f a �r4r , i if y s 1. 5 4a .tl 4 ( .. t� l':..T 4th f t Ith: .f f i , r t'"� s�;yThe 'addition Fof further commercial traffic, from the` end of ' �rJ rwxRegional­1,­ •`Street, �m1x1n with the +flow of these large `trucks g `. i.;r ,t ,,could provide 4;potentia.111y' disastrous effects and les,d: to serious`1.1-111 a. ,. t congestion`prob1" fi , r 1.r ,?; ,'(�k\.P S { * ;�r .. )s..,!­11,S Y{• E ' ' .� , -..{r J + t _..,tx t .t 1 lilt PT- {' _. -. } ' l t t S �. t 1:;_r +" . r'� , r s _ i r` `,2I ....advocate a i`careful vehicle traffic stud "be undertaken .to . evaluate4the burden '"this I:re zoning would iplace on the ..trans- ' portation ,system �'in this :area :of Dublin r .11 t �t �' 1. + ,J,r +Y rit - ' rx ,. - , t Please contact Dan Summers, thef' Pro3ect Manager, if we can be of 'any assistance to the City of 1 "'} Y �i r>! { , n:,' tt J „� D ub in L ` + 'r` ri t1a ',, l_'t {t atttti ` s \ `. j" s !4 ty _ S a a vt a}s , /� p�'7 , 7 4 }, , t' - 1 J 4y 1 s ]Y. 1 x r , r f +r i + ' - i, t tr t ;!,i.. � t l t o k.a r l N e C .�. t L +' r t ` Y J >,. r ih,'' 1 L.1. ,5 ! Jr ,; 7 r. is h , '.s.7 1.J• k r� , L , - } 1 1. { Yl � i.1 -t, l Jl. , is '1 i ; a T r t+ ' Yours;;very ktruly, ` Z' u i� c . t r kf.. , s t4. 1 } i , .- `1 S,, s �tsJn\l..t-fa3'tr.ty Jt'l i1 f ^'t \ S t, , 7 t t tlh+ill ,.' a J } up Y rG��r a w A , i t L+ tr,l , 1 j S r '� ,_ s ; r�. 1 1 it t n,�.' l r , \' I.t ,I 1 ryr t ). -1 , L ,. x I r -,` F 1 0 �,;# 1 1 P er Be or , i = //,, i r �. r k h t ..L {.t ' }at ITi tA , i ,r t _, _.1. �f, _. > .i li'S iY kt .1 , st,�,4LS y55 :.i tilti .Ft_ ! r>, ',r + + h j r s r ` ' I ;t I t t, 1 a 's. tr{ 'i t. 1 � ... I I'j PBB:ak . , , . . - .. J . . cc: .Mr Dan Summers 'Project Manager r' ,._ 1. ..11 s l ' , ., i S 1 ,. { )I .. � , .rf �r„ l 't. / it .i ,.. 1 1.