Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3.1 Approve 04-25-1983 & 04-28-1983 Minutes ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 28, 1983 An adjourned regular meeting and study session of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on Thursday, April 28 , 1983 in the Dublin Library meeting room. The meeting was called to order at 7 :40 p.m. by Mayor Peter Snyder . ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Hegarty , Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder. Representing the County were : Assistant County Administrator Steve Hamill , Undersheriff Dan Vohl and Captain Keith Boyer . REVIEW OF CONTRACT WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF ' s DEPARTMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF POLICE SERVICES The City Council proceeded to evaluate the Sheriff ' s Department following the evaluation format developed by the City Manager. Community Needs As perceived by the City Council , how well has the Sheriff ' s Department performed in responding to the police needs of the community? What effort has been made by Dublin Officers to become familiar with the community? Cm. Moffatt indicated that the communication between the police department and the community needed to be improved. He cited the call forwarding arrangements that the City had made as being confusing to some members of the community. Cm. Jeffery indicated that she had talked to a number of business people who were very supportive of the police service . Cm. Hegarty indicated he would like to see officers get out of the cars more often and become more familiar with the public . Cm. Burton indicated that the police need to work more at identifying themselves with the community. Mayor Snyder had no comments . Public Relations Keeping in mind that there have been approximately 15 ,000 contacts between the police and the public in the first 9 months of the contract , have Dublin Officers attempted to foster good public relations in the City of Dublin? Mayor Snyder indicated that the police officers need to be more "small townish" . CM-2-65`•-L �� O . �' April 28, 1983 Cm. Burton indicated that he had heard some complaints that the police officers were insensitive and indifferent in giving citations . Cm. Hegarty indicated that he had a few complaints as to how traffic stops were handled. Cm. Jeffery indicated that she thought the department was doing a good job with respect to public relations and was especially looking out for the business community. Cm. Moffatt indicated that the police needed to improve their public relations especially in light of what happened at Bonniewood. Do Officers treat the public in a courteous manner whenever possible? Cm. Moffatt indicated that he thought the police were courteous . Cm. Jeffery indicated that she had received no complaints . Cm. Hegarty had no comments . Cm. Burton indicated that traffic enforcement should not be used as a revenue producer and suggested consideration of a warning citation. Mayor Snyder thought that the police treated the public courteously. Responsiveness to the Public Do the Police respond to requests for service in a timely manner? Does the City Council believe that most citizens are satisfied with the disposition of their requests? Cm. Burton indicated that he felt the police department was very responsive . Cm. Hegarty said from his contact with the public that , for the most part , citizens are happy with the response time . Mayor Snyder indicated that responsiveness was good. Cm. Jeffery indicated that the perceived responsiveness was good , and that the service has improved since incorporation. Cm. Moffatt said that the responsiveness was good. Working Relationship with City Government Does the Sheriff ' s Department make an attempt to cooperate with City officials? Cm. Moffatt indicated that the police had been very cooperative . Cm. Jeffery indicated that cooperation from field service personnel was good , but that the cooperation by Sheriff ' s Department administrative personnel could be improved, particularly with respect to the timeliness and CNI-2-66 Adjourned Regular Meeting April 28, 1983 responsiveness to local requests . Cm. Hegarty indicated that the cooperation was satisfactory . Cm. Burton said that the working relationships with the City had been good and indicated that he would like to meet officers in an informal setting, such as a picnic . Mayor Snyder cited the problem of coordination between the County Administrator ' s office and the Sheriff . Visibility Does the City Council perceive the patrol units are visible enough to provide a deterrent to crime? Cm. Burton indicated that the police need to get more visible in terms of better car identification and uniform identification. He also suggested a phone sticker which would assist the public in contacting the police department . Cm. Hegarty indicated that the visibility was good. Mayor Snyder indicated that visibility needs to be improved, particularly with respect to local identification. Cm. Jeffery indicated she had no information to indicate whether the visibility was satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Cm. Moffatt suggested a higher level of visibility utilizing a foot patrol once or twice a day. Community Relations Program Do the police make an effort to develop a good rapport with the schools , business community and community groups? Cm. Moffatt indicated that the community relations programs were good. Cm. Jeffery stated that the crime watch was a good idea and more programs were needed for business , along with more publicity for a ride-along- program. Cm. Hegarty indicated that community relations programs were satisfactory, but suggested that the police make a greater effort to talk to seniors . Cm. Burton thought that the community relations programs could be improved. Mayor Snyder said the community relations programs have been good. Professionalism Cm. Burton indicated that the police service was very professional and efficient . CM-2-67 Adjourned Regular Meeting April 28, 1983 Cm. Hegarty indicated he had no problem with professionalism. Cm. Jeffery suggested more training that was geared to local needs . Cm. Moffatt suggested more training in the area of traffic enforcement , but also indicated that the attitudes of the police officers were very professional . Mayor Snyder indicated that professionalism was satisfactory. Staffing & Equipment As perceived by the City Council , is staffing, equipment and office space adequate in the performance of the following police services in Dublin? Cm. Moffatt indicated that more traffic enforcement was needed, particularly with respect to speeding. He suggested that Staff look into the use of radar. He also indicated that he would like to see more involvement in the area of crime prevention programs . Cm. Jeffery indicated that she did not have enough information to make a judgement . She did suggest that the appearance of the police business office could be improved. Cm. Hegarty indicated that a greater emphasis needed to be placed on narcotics and traffic enforcement . Cm. Burton indicated that more staff was needed in the area of traffic enforcement and also crime prevention. Mayor Snyder had no specific comments with respect to staffing and equipment . Overall Performance How would you rate the overall performance of the Sheriff ' s Department in its provision of services to the City? Cm. Burton indicated that the service was very satisfactory. He also indicated that the police should have a greater focus on public relations and circulate more with the public . Cm. Hegarty indicated that the overall performance was good. Cm. Jeffery suggested developing lines of communications with the public . Cm. Moffatt indicated that the police service should continue to work on communication with the public . Mayor Snyder indicated that more local visibility was needed, but the overall performance was generally good. CM-2-68 Adjourned Regular Meeting April 28, 1983 Mrs . Montemayor , 7670 Bonniewood Lane , was critical of the Sheriff ' s Department performance and spoke in favor of having a City police department . RECESS The City Council completed the performance evaluation and took a 10 minutes recess . The meeting reconvened at 10 : 15 p.m. with all Councilmembers present . Police Staffing The City Manager discussed the recommendation that the City Council approve in concept the addition of a Clerk and Detective Sargeant for Fiscal Year 1983-84. The City Council discussed with representatives of the Sheriff ' s Department the merits of each position. Captain Boyer indicated that the clerical position was needed because Eden Township clerical personnel were presently performing tasks which should be performed in Dublin, and which the City was not being billed for. In addition, the Dublin clerical position was working a considerable amount of overtime and still not keeping up with the workload. If the additional clerical position was funded , this workload could be met and the business office could be open additional hours to serve the public . The additional Detective Sargeant position would be used to reduce the excessive investigative caseload by handling bad check cases . The Detective Sargeant position would also function in the capacity of a juvenile and crime prevention officer . The City Council directed Staff to include these additional positions in the 1983-84 preliminary budget . Contract Issues The City Manager discussed several problems with respect to the 1982-83 contract and recommended that provisions regarding replacement of injured personnel and training be included in the 1983-84 contract . The Sheriff ' s Department agreed that it would be willing to provide the following contract provisions in the 1983-84 contract : 1 . In the event that any Sheriff ' s personnel are absent from duty for more than 10 working days as a result of illness or injury, those personnel shall be replaced at the end of that 10 working day period. 2 . The Sheriff ' s Department agrees to continue to provide training to personnel assigned to Dublin which relate more to the provision of municipal police service . Such training will be provided when needed by the City. With respect to the term of the agreement , the City Council expressed support for a multi-year agreement , but deferred consideration of the specific length of the agreement until the purchase of patrol vehicles could be discussed. Ci1-2-69 Adjourned Regular Meeting April 28, 1983 Patrol Vehicle Purchase The City Manager briefly discussed the comparative analysis prepared by Staff identifying the various options available to the City with respect to the provision of patrol vehicles . The City Manager indicated that Staff was unable to obtain a definitive estimate of private maintenance costs to police vehicles due to the lack of historical information available for identifying major repair costs . The estimate of $10 ,500 provided in the Staff report was a best guess based on discussions with a service manager from a local dealership. The City Manager recommended that the City continue to utilize County vehicles and request the permission of the Sheriff to paint these vehicles and place the City seal on the vehicle in order to provide greater local identity. Those vehicles that would be painted should be new and that the term of the contract should be at least the length of the life of the vehicles provided by the County. The City Manager pointed out that if such a vehicle was totalled, the Sheriff would provide a replacement vehicle with standard County markings immediately. As soon as a permanent vehicle replacement could be acquired by the County and assigned to the City, it would be painted and marked with City colors and identification. The City Manager recommended this alternative for two reasons : 1 ) The cost of the County providing patrol vehicles is known, while the cost of maintaining City purchased vehicles locally is not known. The cost of maintenance could be substantially higher than the estimate provided by Staff . 2 ) If the City purchased its own patrol vehicles , the City would not have adequate backup in the event that one or more patrol vehicles were put out of service for any extended length of time . This would mean that officers would either have to double up or not be able to be placed into service . Cm. Burton indicated that he was in favor of purchasing and maintaining patrol vehicles locally. He indicated that the advantage of having City cars would be a reduction in travel time and down time when serviced . He also indicated that the City would have better control over the cars and that there would be a residual value left in the car once it was removed from police service . He indicated he would like to see a local dealer be given an opportunity to bid on the patrol vehicles and to maintain those vehicles . Mayor Snyder stated that the City would be better off if the County would provide and maintain the cars if the vehicle color could be negotiated with the County. Cm. Burton wanted to have Shamrock Ford be given the opportunity to provide the City with the cost of purchasing and maintaining patrol vehicles . Cm. Moffatt indicated he was torn between saving money and buying locally. Cm. Jeffery thought the City would be better off having the County provide the cars . Chief Shores was asked to discuss the merits of having a mid-size vs a full-size patrol vehicle . CII-2-70 Adjourned Regular Meeting April 28, 1983 Cm. Hegarty asked if the City could purchase the vehicles locally and have the County maintain the vehicles . The City Manager indicated that was possible . The City Council asked the Sheriff ' s Department to resolve the following issues with City Staff : 1 . If the City decides to purchase its own vehicles , will the County provide backup vehicles in the event that a City car cannot be used because of major maintenance or accident? If so, what would be the rental rates? 2 . What are the County ' s maintenance rates if the City purchases its own vehicles and enters into an agreement with the County for maintenance only? The City would also like the County to provide maintenance rates with and without fuel purchase included if possible . 3 . If the City decides to use County vehicles , is it possible to get new cars to replace existing high mileage vehicles? 4. If the City decides to use County vehicles and paint those vehicles with the approval of the Sheriff ' s Department , is the minimum contract period 3 years? The City Council also agreed to give Staff and Cm. Burton additional time to develop private maintenance costs for City purchased vehicles . The City Manager asked the City Council if it wished to discuss the color of the vehicles at this time . The City Council indicated it wished to defer that issue until the issue of how the cars were to be provided was resolved. ADJOURNMENT After completion of discussion, at 12 : 04 a.m. the meeting was adjourned. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CM-2-71 Adjourned Regular Meeting April 28, 1983 REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 25, 1983 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on Monday, April 25 , 1983 in the meeting room, Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7 :40 p.m. by Mayor Peter Snyder. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Hega_r-ty, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Mayor led the Council , Staff and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. CONSENT CALENDAR On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote , the following were approved: Minutes of regular meeting of March 28 , 1983 ; Warrant Register in the amount of $23,953. 24; and Financial Report for Period Ending March 30 , 1983 . PROCLAMATION - MUSEUM SUNDAY Mayor Snyder read proclamation declaring Sunday, May 8, 1983 as "Museum Sunday" . J i� iV JOHN MUIR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Joan Trezek, Director of Public Relations and Ross Hallberg, Director of Planning and Information Services from John Muir Memorial Hospital made a presentation with respect to health care services being offered by that facility. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING ARBOR CREEK DEVELOPMENT AT SAN RAMON ROAD & SILVERGATE DRIVE Mr. Peter Baldwin, representing the Silvertree Homeowner' s Association, was present to speak to the issue raised by the Planning Commission last week regarding the rezoning of the property on the corner of San Ramon Road and CM-2-58 Regular Meeting April 25, 1983 Silvergate Drive . A proposed change of zoning was approved from commercial to residential in order to allow the Arbor Creek development to go into that area . Mr . Baldwin indicated that the Silvertree Homeowner ' s Association has filed a formal request for a review of this decision. Jack Beech, 11873 Dublin Green Drive and Jim Hjerpe , 7774 Woodren Court questioned the means used by the City for notifying the public re matters such as this . The Planning Director reported that 3 forms of legal notification were followed with this particular project in question: - 1 ) notified property owners within a 300' radius , as indicated on the last assessment rolls ; 2 ) posted a notice on site; 3) published notice in newspapers . Mayor Snyder indicated that this issue will be an agendized item on May 9th, at which time a public hearing will be held and both sides of the issue will be presented to the City Council and a decision rendered. Even though several people in the audience wished to discuss the subject , Mayor Snyder reiterated that it would be inappropriate at this meeting, and at a future public hearing, everyone who wished to add comments could then be heard. Staff was directed to attempt to arrange for a larger capacity meeting room because of the expected large number of people who wish to be heard on this subject . CABLE TELEVISION LITIGATION The City Manager felt that the communication received, even though it wasn' t addressed to the City Council , was a good item to bring the Council up to date . It involves a Senate Bill currently being considered in Congress , involving the regulation of cable television. A compromise was reached between the National League of Cities and the National Cable Television Association with regard to pending federal cable legislation. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote , the Council agreed to send a resolution expressing opposition to language entitled "Compromise Between National League of Cities and National Cable Television Association on Federal Cable Legislation". Mayor Snyder felt some wording changes would need to be made to suggested format of resolution because of Dublin' s situation. Staff was directed to make the necessary corrections and send resolution to appropriate representatives . RESOLUTION NO. 19 - 83 EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO LANGUAGE ENTITLED "COMPROMISE BETWEEN NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES AND NATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION ON FEDERAL CABLE LEGISLATION" CM-2-59 Regular Meeting April 25, 1983 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OF AMADOR VALLEY BLVD & DONAHUE DRIVE At its meeting of February 11 , 1983, the City Council asked Staff to report on Cm. Hegarty ' s request for improved pedestrian safety at Amador Valley Boulevard at Donahue Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard at San Ramon Road. The City Traffic Engineer prepared and presented a detailed report to the City Council . The City Traffic Engineer indicated that all the recommendations they make are based on safety as a primary issue and the movement of traffic and the avoidance of congestion as secondary. The City Traffic Engineer explained that because most motorists are not expecting to see such a sign, they simply do not see it . Therefore , the use of "NO RIGHT TURN ON RED" signs is very ineffective and was not recommended. With regard to bicycle regulations , it was clarified that motorists must go into bike lanes to make right hand turn ( in absence of bicyclists ) . Cm. Moffatt suggested a possible sign indicating "Pedestrians Have Right Of Way" . Cm. Moffatt further moved that this item be tabled until we have a chance to publicize the issue . The motion died for lack of a second. Several members of the audience felt that the biggest problem was the lack of enforcement . Motorists simply disregard pedestrians , and pedestrians crossing in a crosswalk with no signalization are really taking their lives into their own hands . Cm. Jeffery felt that such a sign would give pedestrians a false sense of security, but perhaps there were other alternatives which could be considered prior to putting up this sign. On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by majority vote , Staff was directed to have "NO RIGHT TURN ON RED" signs placed east and westbound on Amador Valley Blvd. , onto Donahue Drive northbound, and into the Gemco Center southbound. Voting no on this issue were Cm. Jeffery and Cm. Moffatt . STREET NAMING & NAME CHANGING PROCEDURE On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote , the reading was waived and an ordinance adopted establishing the procedure for changing of street names . ORDINANCE NO. 4 - 83 FOR PROCEDURE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT & CHANGING OF STREET NAMES CM-2-60 Regular Meeting April 25, 1983 ORDINANCE AMENDING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote , the reading was waived and the following ordinance adopted: ORDINANCE NO. 5 - 83 AMENDING CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF (To . Add Position of City Engineer) CIVIC CENTER STUDY COMMITTEE In accordance with City Council direction, the Traffic Engineer has evaluated the access problems which were previously identified with utilizing the Dublin San Ramon Services site for a permanent City office location. The Traffic Engineer has indicated that those access problems could be mitigated with both on-site improvements and improvements to Dublin Boulevard. Staff recommended that the City Council designate a Civic Center Study Committee , consisting of two City Councilmembers and Staff . The Committee would be charged with the responsibility of surveying those sites within the City which might be suitable for a permanent City office location. The survey would also include a preliminary review of the advantages and disadvantages of each site . In addition, the Committee would also meet with representatives of the Dublin San Ramon Services District regarding the potential for the use of the DSRSD site . Cm. Burton suggested representation by the Chamber of Commerce on the committee . Consensus of the Council was , however, that initially, the committee should not have community volunteers . The two City Councilmembers who will serve on this committee will be Mayor Snyder and Cm. Moffatt . RECESS A short recess was called. The meeting reconvened at 9 :45 p.m. with all Councilmembers present . AUTHORIZATION FOR BID DUBLIN BOULEVARD/SILVERGATE DRIVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS VILLAGE PARKWAY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS These two projects have been designed by Santina & Thompson as previously authorized by the City Council . Because both projects are small and contain CM-2-61 Regular Meeting April 25, 1983 similar concrete work, they have been combined in anticipation of obtaining better bids by reason of economy of scale . Mayor Snyder questioned the status of the 50% contribution by the County. The City Manager explained that we have. no more information than when they- agreed to it initially. The proposed schedule was set : 1 ) Bidding April 28th to June lst ; 2 ) Award bid June 13th; 3 ) Construction June 20th through September 20th. On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Burton, and by unanimous vote , the Council authorized Staff to advertise for bids for these improvements . SAN RAMON ROAD PLAN LINE In accordance with earlier City Council direction, the City Engineer and City Traffic Engineer have prepared a fairly comprehensive study with respect to the improvements of the corridor on San Ramon Road between the northerly boundary at Alcosta Boulevard and the southerly boundard at I-580. Plans identifying the proposed lane configurations and intersection modifications , were presented for the Council review. A number of issues were identified, and the City Manager indicated that a public hearing date should be set so property owners are notified. On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote , the Council directed Staff to: 1 ) Review the traffic study and schematic street .plan line drawing as a basis for future improvements to San Ramon Road. 2 ) Review the issues discussed and determine if additional issues need to be addressed by Staff prior to a public hearing. 3 ) Set a public hearing date for consideration of the San Ramon Plan Line. 4) Refer to the Planning Commission for public hearing the issue of a "Specific Plan" designation, and direct Staff to prepare the necessary documents to facilitate such consideration. 5) Prepare for Council consideration, an interim zoning ordinance to prohibit uses in conflict with the contemplated Specific Plan. 6 ) Prepare a policy regarding the installation of "non-traffic" direction signs . The timeframe will be approximately 4 weeks . OTHER BUSINESS East Bay Division - League of California Cities Meeting A general membership meeting of the East Bay Division of the League of California Cities is being held on Friday, April 29th at the Roundhill Country Club. Those Councilmembers wishing to attend were asked to notify Staff so that proper reservations could be made . CM-2-62 Regular Meeting April 25, 1983 East Bay MUD The Council requested that Staff send a copy of the City ' s letter which was sent to Supervisor George regarding the East Bay MUD annexation issue to DSRSD. Additional Staff Cm. Burton felt that Staff should have more people in order to better support required responsibilities and provide services to the public in a more efficient and timely manner. The City Manager indicated that additional staff will be requested during the budget process . Cm. Burton stated that it was his opinion that additional help should be brought in prior to July, because of all the additional projects being undertaken. He felt it unfair that Staff was working nights and weekends . Cm. Jeffery and Cm. Hegarty felt that Staff should outline where additional help is needed and present to Council for consideration. Jobs Bill The City Manager stated that Council may have read in the newspapers very recently that Congress passed the Jobs Bill . What this means for Dublin is that a certain amount of funds have been allocated to those cities in the County of Alameda under a population of 50,000 for the development of projects to the Housing and Community Development Act process . Staff has been advised that Dublin will have approximately $31 , 700 available . After the Community Development Block Grant criteria is met , we must get the project into the County by May 13th. The figure was received just today. Dublin is at an extreme disadvantage , in that all the other cities that are well established, have a lot of projects on the shelf that they have thrown into the CDBG competition. So, other cities are able to pull these projects out , have them go through the necessary citizen and council review, and submit to the County. The City Manager indicated that Staff will attempt to put a project together. As part of the Community Development Block Grant process , $50 ,000 was made available some time back. Staff will attempt to put the two amounts together to come up with a recommended project . City Base Map Project The City Manager reported that the City had requested that DSRSD share in the costs of putting the base map together. The DSRSD Board of Directors CM-2-63 Regular Meeting April 25, 1983 considered this request that they pick up 50% of the cost . Their Sewer & Water Committee reduced the request to 40% and the Board further reduced it to 20%. The City Manager suggested sending a letter pointing out some of the benefits to the District and actual savings that could be realized. An alternative would be to accept no money from the DSRSD, and simply charge them on a per sheet useage basis . Consensus of the Council was to give the DSRSD Board another opportunity to share in the cost of putting the base map together. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council , at 11 :40 p.m. , the meeting was adjourned to an adjourned regular meeting for a study session to review the Alameda County Sheriff ' s Department contract at 7 : 30 p.m. on April 28 , 1983 at the Dublin Library. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CM-2-64 Regular Meeting April 25, 1983 C I T Y OF D U B L I N REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS May 23, 1983 WARRANT PAYEE AMOUNT FOR 1322 Alameda County Sheriff's Dept $ 2,318.59 Animal Shelter & Field Services April 1983 1323 Richard C. Ambrose 250.00 May Car Allowance 1324 Central Bank 1,099.20 Federal Tax Deposit - 2nd Qtr 1983 1325 County of Contra Costa 59.40 Signal Maintenance - March 1983 1326 Dublin Station Investors 2,587.50 June Rent - Suites 100, 101, 217 - 1327 Arnie Hollander 1,793.75 Planning Consultant Services - April 1983 1328 Kay Keck 85.41 Reimburse Medical Coverage - June 1983 1329 Marc Sweeping Service 3,085.45 Street Sweeping - April 1983 1330 PERS 650.94 Contribution - Period Ending /30/83 1331 PCBE 1,010.25 Traffic Signal Lighting - 4/7-5 /9/83 it PG8E 874.95 Street Lighting - April 1983 1332 Santina & Thompson 7,427.29 Inv.1838 Dublin Engr Sery 4/4-4/29/83 3,319.70 Inv.1839 Dublin Blvd/Silvergate Channelizatr �. _., 2,998.10 Inv.1840 Village Parkway Drainage " 13,390.10 Inv.1843 City Mapping 708.00 Inv.1844 Ross Dept Store Access Study 168.00 Inv.1845 City Hall Traffic Study " 4,626.00 Inv.1846 San Ramon Road Studies 5.10 Inv.1847 Dublin Boulevard Studies 1,187.50 Inv.1848 Street Light Assessment District " 1,981.00 Inv.1849 Tract 4991 Plan Check 1333 Laurence L. Tong 150.00 May Car Allowance 1334 Tri-Valley Herald 90.90 Publish Ordinance #3 Legal #0700 of Tri-Valley Herald 96.00 Publish Revenue Sharing Notice it Tri-Valley Herald 20.20 Public Hearing Notice 5/16/83 Legal #0731 1335 West Publishing Company 85.73 California Codes 1336 Westpark Associates 200.00 Bookkeeping Services - April 1983 Sub-Total $ 50,269.06 - - - PAYROLL - - - 5/16/83 (Pay Period Ending 5/15/83) - - - Check # Payee Gross�Pa Federal W/H State W/H P E R S Net Pa_y T087- Ric a�C. Ambrose $1,666.66 190-00 T--4 - $ 777.67 $ 11.314. 4 1088 Kay Keck 862.50 63.50 10.00 60.38 728.62 1089 Laurence L. Tong 1,350.00 158.30 33.60 94.50 1,063.6C 1090 Linda L. Trahey 756.37 134.80 25.60 50.75 545.22 $ 0 -1i4-75 �0 GRAND TOTALS - WARRANTS & PAYROLL - $ 53,920.74 APPROVED FOR PAYi IEW ' ;G� �• City Mana er AFFIDAVIT: I certify that these demands are accurate and that funds are available for their payment. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL City Clerk Mayor ITEM N0. �.