HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.2 Landscaping/Lighting Assessment CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: June 13, 1988
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District
No. 1986-1 (Tract 5511)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Preliminary Engineer's Report
2) Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming
Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of
Assessment
3) Assessment Diagram
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open Public Hearing
2) Receive Staff report and public testimony
3) Question Staff and the public
4) Close Public Hearing and deliberate
5) Adopt Resolution Approving Engineer's Report,
Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering
Levy of Assessment
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: $47,000 to be assessed to property owners for 1988-89
landscaping and lighting maintenance costs. No cost
to the City.
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the review and approval of the 145-unit single family
development (Village VI) and the other, multi-family Villages, certain
landscaping and open space maintenance was made a condition of approval. This
maintenance assessment district provides funds for this work. The City
Council approved formation of the District on November 10, 1986, with the
initial assessment in the 1987-88 tax year.
The County Assessor collects these monies for the City for the
maintenance of landscaping and irrigation systems, right-of-way fencing, walls
and entrance signs, trash removal, and maintenance of the open space lots
(firebreaks, weed abatement, slope drainage, and slope stability repair) . The
open space parcel maintenance will be charged to the District for three years
only, similar to the agreement made for Tract 4719. The District's boundaries
include all of Tract 5511, excluding Villages IV and V, which are proposed to
be annexed as they develop.
This past year (1987-88) , the only expenses incurred by the City were
the Engineer's Report and administration (approximately $2,000) and weed
abatement along the open hills (approximately $3,850) . This allows an
estimated carryover reserve, including interest, of $48,610.
The assessment per single family lot last year was $120. This year's
assessment is proposed to be $96.46, as maintenance is expected to begin
September 1st, thus only incurring costs for 10 months.
On April 25, 1988, the City Council authorized preparation of the
Preliminary Engineer's Report which is attached to this agenda statement.
Staff held an informational meeting with interested property owners on May
19th in order to explain the scope of work and answer any questions. On May
23rd, the City Council adopted resolutions approving the preliminary -
Engineer's Report and setting June 13, 1988, as the date of the protest
hearing. Notice of the hearing was published, posted, and mailed to property
owners in accordance with Government Code regulations.
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing and
adopt the resolution.
ITEM NO. - Z COPIES TO: Rafanelli & Nahas
Ahmanson Developments
Standard Pacific
CITY OF DUBLIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.DISTRICT NO. 1986-1
(TRACT 5511)
FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CONTENTS
1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs,
Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning
2. Assessment Diagram
5;:15 'rrt: Ei:'4 33s.�.� •
ASSESSMENT .
WHEREAS, on April 25, 1988, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California,
pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act'Of 1972, adopted its
Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance: Assessment District
for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report
pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq. of said Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said
Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment
to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements
and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District.
ESTIMATE OF'. COSTS
(1) (2) (3)
As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally .
Approved Approved
Cost of Maintenance $ 34,100 $ 34,100
Incidental Expenses $ 66,110 $ 66,110
TOTAL COST: $ 100,210 $ 100,210
1988-89 Interest Income
Applied to 1988-89
Operating Costs $ 3,600 $ 3,600
Surplus from Previous
Fiscal Year $ 49,610 $ 49,610
NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 $ 47,000 $ 47,000
As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior
boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the lines and
dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance
assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said
resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon
said diagram.
I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or
parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district by
apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the
estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of
said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by
reference made a part hereof.
-2-
•
Said assessment is made upon the .several lots or parcels of land within said
landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits
to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance of said
improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram
numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more .
particular description of said property.
Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by.
reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of
Alameda for the fiscal year 1988-1989 and includes all of such parcel excepting those
portions thereof within existing public roads or .right-of-way ,to be acquired in'these
proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said '
property, reference is hereby made to the deeds .and maps-on file and of record in the
office of the County Recorder of said County. ' Because the names of the several
• owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "Unknown":opposite the number of
each lot or parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and the number of
the assessment.
Dated:.
City Engineer
•
•
-3-
SCOPE OF WORK
The following areas are to be maintained by this Maintenance Assessment
District:
1) The median and roadside landscaping (north side of street) along the length
of Willow Creek Drive. '
2) Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
15, 16, 37, and south of Lot 145, all within Tract 5511.
3) Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along Dougherty
Road between Wildwood Road and Amador Valley Boulevard, and along Amador Valley
Boulevard between Dougherty Road and Wildwood Road.
4) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west_side
of Wildwood Road.
5) Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, -and pathway improvements along the west
side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard in Lot 150.
6) Cutting of firebreaks, maintaining slope drainage, and slope stability
repair along the open space Lots A and D of Tract 5511 and Parcel A of Tract 5780.
The maintenance within item number 6 is limited to three years; the City will assume
cost of maintenance after three years.
-4-
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report
for the fiscal year 1988-89 is as follows:
Maintenance
1. Weeding, fertilizing, pruning, plant replacement,
irrigation system: $ 19,700
2. Utilities: • 4,800
3. Reserves for structural repairs to structures
and fences: 3,500.
4. Trash removal 1,100
5. Firebreaks, drainage maintenance, open space 5,000
$ 34,100
•
Incidentals
1. Engineer's Report and Proceedings $ 2,000
2. Cost of Collection (County of Alameda) 650
3. Delinquencies 2,500
4. Contingencies/Reserve 60,960
$ 66,110
Total $ 100,210
-5-
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Amount of Assessment
Assessment and Lot No. Property Owners 1988-89 Tax Year
Lot 1 - 145 Unknown $ 96.46 per lot = $13,986.70
Lot 150 (Village I) Unknown $ 2,895.20
Lot 151 (Commercial Corner) Unknown $ 404.20
Lot 149 (Village II) Unknown $11,961.76
Lot 148 (Village III) Unknown $10,420.14
Lot 147 (Village VII) Unknown $ 7,332.00
$47,000.00
•
-6-
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
Each single—family lot (Lots 1 — 145) has been assessed at a value of
$96.46 per year. Each approved multi—family village has been assessed at the
following percentage rates based on units of approved density. Lots A through D and
H, being creek, park, and open space have been assigned a zero assessment. The ratio
of assessments is as follows:
Lots 1 — 145 29.76%
Lot 150 (Village I) - 6.16%
Lot 151 (Commercial Corner) .86%
Lot 149 (Village II) 25.45%
Lot 148 (Village III) 22.17%
Lot 147 (Village VII) 15.60%
-7-
•
•
CITY OF DUBLIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT' 86-1
• - CERTIFICATIONS
•
• ' FISCAL-YEAR 1988-1989
•
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California; hereby certify -,that the
foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column
(1), with the .diagram thereto attached, .was filed with me on May 19, 1988.
•
•I, the City Clerk of the City 'of Dublin, 'California, hereby-certify th`. the•
foregoing Assessment; with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved -
. and confirmed by the City Council -of said City by its Resolution No. /:. !--88 duly, •
adopted by said Council on MAY 23, -
= ,►
I, the City Clerk of•the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and
confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -88 duly adopted
by said Council on - . -
•
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, _hereby certify that a certified
copy of the assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of
the County of Alameda, California, on , 1988.
•
•
•
•
•
•
-8- .
RESOLUTION NO. -88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,
AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT
CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1986-1
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 60-88, a resolution directing
preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District, City of
Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 1986-1
(the "district") , this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer and
ordered that Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with
and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City
Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for, which report was
presented to the City Council on May 23, 1988; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has filed with the City Clerk an
Engineer's Report for final consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered said Report and
each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said
Report is sufficient; and that said Report nor any part thereof requires
modification in any respect;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
a) That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs
and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses
in connection therewith, be; and each of them are hereby finally approved;
b) That the diagram showing the assessment district, description
of improvements to be maintained; and the boundaries and dimensions of the
respective lots and parcels of land within said district as contained in said
district as contained in said report be, and it is hereby finally approved;
c) The assessment of the total amount of cost and expenses of
the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and
parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits. to
117 .i ae . '
be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance and
of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said report be, and they
are hereby finally approved and those assessments are hereby ordered levied
as contained in said reports.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk •
;a
LIME 1(4!1.140 012704% CARVE 01.1.7A W011A 041: IA110CN7 RCM DIOR/0163 Lill CAMP 'MAW
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
N 2740.32.11 03.50 1 00'00'00• 00.06 75.54 00.00 70.71 N 4.13.02.E la _
M 27'40'32'6 260.02 2 31.03'00' .64.00 330.70 175.73 334.21 N 73.11.20.E
M 00'4'00'11 23.00 3 30'03.00' 460.00 200.40 1.0.60 204.60 N 73.11.20.E pANZT/j/Y • 6..
M 110.4'00.11 •6.11 4 06.4'00• 00.00 70:64. 00.00 70.71 N 43'40•60•11 ^A1�` � -. Street Lighting Maintenance • -
X 34'00.06'41 150.00 0 3.31'25' 1555.00 00.63 47..83 00.62 N 13'34'17'M
X 00.36.30.11 06.00 6 16.60.24• 1.555.00 430.60 210.70 436.20 N 00.16.44.1 Sire a ., ‘ Assessment District 86-1•M 06.36.30.11 100.00 7 3['03.06• 606.00 31[.31 154.06 313.16 N 73.11.26.E I .0.
N 00.10.00.E 52.12 u
N 56.15.65.E 136.54 CITY OF DUBLIN.
M 10.27'30.11 1!.0.35 ♦ ^ 6i
M 66.4'61'41 p.0161 I 514crr i,Pr " _
M 61.40'56'6 24'00 ALAMEDA.COUNTY CALIFORNIA
M 15'75'00.11 210.67 6
•
N 17.15.26.1 264.53 .'00110100 50 0 TOO 400 _503 l//C/N/T}' AMP
M 00.22.21.11 160'07 �}� -•-� -71 Nrs, FISCAL YEAR 1988/89
X 06.4':d'41 153.11 � �J. -1 1
M 60'20.07.1 50.00 KALE JN/EE/ .
N 29.30.03.11 20.66 SCALE: 1.■200'
•
CAMP PARKS
' 1 :41: r10AD ��� R.140.00!S?.In'� -1 ,N .�--`• - _ ,
L .b lVUNO 4[1([01 coons/ DOUG:f � 1 /� ' �'YV/pIEN/'T•E' „'Yl (3 117 y-•- e �j4' ; ' �L?�`-, •, ., 1111", ,-::= LU7 'C' !J. 8 STRICT 57 p 1. 1 L `\.. I BOUNDARY S�^-i 1217,1 - 1 41 �, �- �.. Nat IJ c\
r/s6: �L�:._._ r . _ N 11. eii. . I > OT F .\ 1 1-u - 'R' 1AC'» - r-47� 110 _ _
I N O�-N D_.pp p� ��_ � N UU rNf.�r y RUAO 1 \ � --- JU
•10•J/• [110 t_ _.. � _ - N 015.t11-1151.12 _ .
!I
JUJ.
• E JL.lJ- �.6a I-1J�.77'9�'L�117•'.N � _ U!183 h„ - r . 4f •
lrlUE 1 1 ' 1 � N N� OCt/GHERYY R040 _�__ ti
1c 1). 1 W/OE.V:hYi u.w. ;
7 1 La 11 CI 1413 1 1 i
u - Mr L y for 9' \ I by A 150 'Iio
a (1407 114 D13TRICT) ■�' - O \ \ \ ;:
U1 16 '1 -\ .. �- - -- - \ \� C�
O!P y1l\
4 nj,41 r . \� 837.4• IJ/, ., • ■ , p ` .�\
F 1 DISTRICT BOUNDARY, 1�`0j Or y_ \ _[sENE� �y \ 149 \ e
• o - 14 19.9, n �m - •��'.� ) \ • �p • _.j
Co / �// ^�� • ' \ ? ;` tr• LI®
•1: LOT 'E' nlm to/
D A/( cR�F/Y IRCLE \ '°!mil \� -"3
o't m 1 O P r . i
• U 1. r „1.‘.,.\7.32/
., 1'� r. �/ N ul N M..1 \. ..6-•\ ' - . '/ \� J
• '� . .. .. y,,, .q 1,,'I n. .....n 11 lr •i 1 1y `X ."1 'u al n m ut n ;,911 7.1
` • ' r
1 u �1�.1...1 ,1�A0 \ \\�1• >' SpUjRRF t° 147 �\ �.`• _RU•4P
� t \ I..I
411 I I"' 11 11 1. ` \\ ,AA l ,Y n <. ef.-- GIRO_C: ^ 11 ` 1 _ _ __ ' ' %COT
• i '� 1 I,1 9 o m n'^ f11" m m„u .1 - 3 LOT 'G' Vii'• \ o1/ I/ •P/ u0 63 ��� ° o a v m m i '. N 09
• r1� • y1� m n ° ��f TRACT r•
\a.t'.� '74/'0/ 4 I ^ Op0- •.•. •. _ , 6 .■ Lot 15312 M 41 • 1 '
^i, I O m
��� + ; A�"'•1 �°7 w!' N 41 Iv _� °1 m1 m y'� m " m m n�j u _ c� m ,�, °!� ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL '. 1 4�' 1
) 1.:!,! 1 :n v - / , WATER CONSERVATION 0/STRICT THE NETER AND ROUNDS
• ��.' _•1 I~' , �� . .f....! / PA4Y.•EL"C"SER/ES NO d4-U-6944 DESCRIPTION OP TII1S •
�'-- `"F• _��� DISTRICT ARE COTERN THUS "z''
1.01 '.4 .• ^•r • DISTRICT BOUNDARY I NlrH rRACr sstt EXCEPT
Nom• TNA! PARCEL lib LS '
EXCLUDED AND RESCRYCD
N oelo•.70'5 837.r
FOR-A FUTURE DISTRICT
- -- ANNEXATION. '
LOT 159 TRACT 4719-^142 H 41 -
BASIS OF BEARINGS °` u ,, , .
. ,- -
....um 01'163 IN TIE 11•!61 atom 1411160076 ' 3 M(, v `
/3003 ILIN705CON,O Caf/A _ i�� ! rNtil,*" 'y Y -
COVN/!'830000!N/ /J./ - AI bq Ill 6341414 111 I.II!Ill 11011!4 6117(f631q - • P•1'fl k ` f ,
IANEN 43 1401'13.02'8. PEN P.N.4075 '. LEI
BOOK 155 MAPS. PAGE 67. % Sheet 1 of 1
.. - I • - - - C03343