Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.10 MAD 97-1 Formation CITY CLERK File # 3 6.Q'�-� AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 13, 1996 SUBJECT: Formation of Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 97-1 (Santa Rita Area) Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson,Public Works Director EXITS ATTACHED: 1) Resolution Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report 2) Resolution of Intention 3) Preliminary Engineer's Report and Diagram 4) Copy of Agenda Statement from July 23, 1996,Meeting 5) Draft Minutes from July 23, 1996, Meeting RECOMMENDATION: n#" Adopt Resolutions FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No assessments are proposed for FY 1996-97. The estimated assessment for FY 1997-98 is $39,411, or$460.40 per acre(based on 85.6 acres), depending on the extent of landscaping that is installed for that year. Additional financial information is provided in the Description below. Assessments are subject to review and approval of the City Council on an annual basis through the required public hearing process. • DESCRIPTION: At the July 23, 1996, meeting,the City Council received a petition from the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority requesting formation of a landscaping and lighting maintenance assessment district for the Santa Rita development area in eastern Dublin. The formation of an assessment district under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the following actions: 1. Adoption of a resolution initiating proceedings. _ -The Council adopted a resolution initiating proceedings at its July 23, 1996, meeting. 2. Approval of the Engineer's Report. The proposed Resolution Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report (Exhibit 1) is before the Council for adoption tonight. 3. Adoption of a resolution of intention. COPIES TO: Pat Cashman,Alameda Co. Steve Hicks,K&B Joseph Azar,Ruggeri-Jensen ITEM NO. ' to g:\assessdist\97-1\agstfrm2 • 1. The proposed Resolution of Intention (Exhibit 2) is before the Council for adoption tonight. 4. Adoption of a resolution ordering the improvements and formation of the district, approving the final Engineer's Report, and confirming the assessment and diagram. This resolution can be adopted following 45 days'notice to the property owner and a public meeting and public hearing which will be scheduled for September 17 and October 1, respectively. (Please note that, although the Surplus Property Authority is the only property owner and has petitioned for formation of the district, the statute still requires notice and public meeting and hearing.) This assessment district would fund street landscape maintenance and utility costs for the Santa Rita development area. This area is bounded by Arnold (Sebille)Road on the west, Gleason Drive on the north, Tassajara Road on the east, and Interstate 580 on the south, as shown on the assessment diagram included with Exhibit 3. The scope of work includes maintenance of roadside landscaping for Dublin Boulevard, Hacienda Drive, the"transit spine," a portion of Arnold (Sebille)Road, Tassajara Road (westerly portion), and a portion of Gleason Drive, plus the maintenance of the trail and landscaping along the Tassajara Creek channel, as delineated in the scope of work on Page 1 and 2 of the Engineer's Report. At this time,the Surplus Property Authority is the only property owner within the proposed area of assessment. As various properties are sold and developed,the new property owners would be assessed according to the formula set forth in the Engineer's Report. It is proposed that the cost of maintenance be spread equally among the property owners on a per-acre basis. In the case of single-family or multi-family residential developments, the assessment would be based on the total acreage of the development, divided equally among the single-family or multi-family housing units. (If a residential development contains both single- and multi-family units, the proportion between the two housing types may be different, based on their relative areas divided by the number of units for each density category.) The estimated assessment for the 1997-98 fiscal year is$39,411, or$460.40 per acre, based on 85.6 acres anticipated to be developed at that time. The ultimate assessment at buildout is estimated to be $317,756, or$710 per acre, based on 447.6 acres, and based on 1996-97 unit costs. The Engineer's Report further specifies that the maximum developed acre assessment will be increased annually by the percentage of increase of the Consumer Price Index(San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners), insofar as non-utility costs are concerned. Any actual increase in utility costs will also be passed on to the properties directly as part of the assessment. Any costs in excess of the total maximum allowable assessment"cap" of$710 per acre for developed properties would be assessed to the Surplus Property Authority's remaining undeveloped property. The Engineer's Report proposes a formula for calculating the assessment at buildout of the Santa Rita • property. As such, once the initial assessment is levied, it will merely be necessary for the Council to annually determine the amount of the assessment by applying the formula. Page 2 The public hearings for formation of this District and levy of the assessment for Fiscal Year 1997-98 are proposed to be held on September 17th and October 1st. There will be no assessment for Fiscal Year 1996-97. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report, and the Resolution of Intention. Staff will then give the required notice for public hearings to be held on September 17 and October 1, 1996. • Page 3 • RESOLUTION NO. -96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT, LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 94-96, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-1 (Santa Rita Area) (the "District"), this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for in said Resolution No. -96 and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient; and that said report neither requires nor should be modified in any.respect; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED a) That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of maintaining said - - - improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, as contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed; b) That the diagram showing the assessment district, description of the improvements to be maintained, and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots and parcels of land within said District, as contained in said report be, and it is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed; c) That the assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land in said District in proportion to __ the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance, and of • the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said report be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of August, 1996. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk g:(ad)l97-1lresopre • RESOLUTION NO. - 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) Recitals The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: 1. The City Council intends to order the formation of an assessment district and to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 1997-98 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. 2. The improvements to be made in the assessment district are generally described as follows: The maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas, entry features, entry lighting, masonry soundwalls,wrought iron fences, publicly-owned drainage ditches, irrigation systems, trees and plantings, furnishing of water and power for irrigation systems, together with all appurtenant and incidental expenses for the following areas:, a) The northerly and southerly street frontages for Dublin Boulevard from Sebille Road (Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road. b) The northerly and southerly street frontages for the"transit spine"from Sebille Road (Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road excluding the future school frontage landscaping. c) The southerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Sebille Road(Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road and the northerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Tassajara Creek to - Tassajara Tassajara Road. d) The easterly street frontage for Sebille Road (Arnold Road)from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive. e) The easterly and westerly street frontages for Hacienda Drive from the I-580/Hacienda interchange to Gleason Drive. f) The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road 350 feet southerly of Tassajara Road and _ Dublin Boulevard intersection to 450'northerly of the Gleason Drive and Tassajara Road intersection. g) Tassajara Creek and trail from I-580 to the northerly property boundary of the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority property(APN 946-15-1-10). h) Street median landscapings are not part of this District. 3. This assessment district shall be known as"Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-1 (Santa Rita Area)." The general location of the assessment district is: the area within the City of Dublin bounded by Arnold (Sebille)Road on the west, Gleason Drive on the north, Tassajara Road on the east, and Interstate 580 on the south. 4. In accordance with Resolution No. 94-96, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings for Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-1 (Santa Rita Area), the City Engineer has filed with the City Clerk the report required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. All / IB T 2/ interested persons are referred to that report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district. • 5. The City Council will conduct one public meeting and one public hearing on the question of the formation of the assessment district and the levy of the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The meeting and hearing will be held, respectively, on Setember 17, 1996, and October 1, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. at the Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California. 6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Government Code Section 54954.6(c). PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of August, 1996. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: • City Clerk g:lassessdist197-11resoftm2 oFDU6, 0().\ - 19 aul' — I %I' 82 <1.> 4Z-IFOO\ PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) - -- , - The-undersigned-respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the - - City Council. DATED: AUGUST 13, 1996 Engineecof Work By: / .711/t�a. Page 1 5 • • ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) LEE THOMPSON, City Engineer of the City of Dublin and Engineer of Work for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. 97-1 (Santa Rita Area), City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The total assessment District area shall be 447.6 acres as shown in Part F (the Assessment Diagram) of this report. The Ultimate Improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows (hereinafter"Improvements"): The maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas, entry features, entry lighting, masonry soundwalls, wrought iron fences, publicly-owned drainage ditches, irrigation systems, trees and plantings, furnishing of water and power for irrigation systems, together with all appurtenant and incidental expenses for the following areas: 1. The northerly and southerly street frontages-for Dublin Boulevard from Sebille Road (Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road. 2. . The northerly and southerly street frontages for the "transit spine" from Sebille Road (Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road excluding the future school frontage-.landscaping.--------_--- _ _ _ _ ___ - 3. The southerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Sebille Road (Arnold Road) to Tassajara Road and the northerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road. 4. The easterly street frontage for Sebille Road (Arnold Road) from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive. 5. The easterly and westerly street frontages for Hacienda Drive from the 1-580/Hacienda interchange to Gleason Drive. Page 2 G 6. The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road 350 feet southerly of Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard intersection to 450' northerly of the Gleason Drive and Tassajara Road intersection. 7. Tassajara Creek and trail from 1-580 to the northerly property boundary of the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority property (APN 946- 15-1-10). 8. Street median Iandscapings are not part of this District. This report consists of six parts, as follows: PART A - Site plan and street cross sections. PART B - An Estimate of the annual maintenance costs of the ultimate Improvements. PART C -An assessment of the estimated cost of the Improvement on each benefitted parcel of land within the assessment district. PART D - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel. PART E A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized_assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. PART F -A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. Respectfully submitted, jc:jko_.1 LEE THOMPSON Engineer of Work Page 3 • PART A SITE PLAN AND STREET CROSS SECTIONS Page 4 5- 142' 11W 20' 44' 14' M' 20' e 110' R/W 7'5 a e' I 12' I 12' I 12' I 12' 12' 12' ' e' (REQUIRED FOR 28' 52' SW — —4' SW CHANNEL R/W) 40' 1 10'. I ...... r 24' 4. 24' B' 12' 12' 6' I _5' SW DUBLIN BLVD. —_ (ARNOLD ROAD TO HACIENDA DRIVE & TASSAJARA CREEK TO TASSAJARA ROAD) N.T.S. ARNOLD ROAD 60'R (FROM DUBLIN BLVD. TO GLEASON DRIVE) 148' 11/W 10' 20' 20' 10' 77 ra ai N.T.S. • 71' I +' sw 15' 8' I 12' 12' 12' 2It 12' 12' 12' 5' 12' 12' 4' Sw 5, 15'SW 102' R/W SW�`1 r___— COLLECTOR ROAD "A" 12' J2' 14' 32' 12' DUBLIN BLVD. 8' 12' 12' I 12' 12' e ' (FROM HACIENDA DR. TO COLLECTOR ROAD "A") (DUBLIN BLVD TO TRANSIT SPINE) 5' SW 1I — N.T.S. 1 N.T.S. I 162, RW HACIENDA DRIVE J2'-J5' 44'10 46' 24' -15:- (FROM ROUTE 580 TO GLEASON DRIVE) Wen _j6' 12' 12' 5 SW N.T.S. PAIR r —I � 102' R/w D =� 106'R/W I DUBLIN BLVD. 20' - 24' is' 15' 20' TO 28' 14' 12' 32' 32' 12' 14' SW X15' SW e' I 12' I 12' I 12' I 12' I 8' (FROM COLLECTOR ROAD "A" TO TASSAJARA CREEK) I 5'Sw I( I 5' sw N.T.S. ----6' CENTRAL PARKWAY 94' 11/W (HACIENDA DRIVE TO TASSAJARA ROAD) GLEASON DRIVE (ARNOLD ROAD TO TASSAJARA ROAD) e' e' 24' 14' 24' 4' e' f N.T.S. • SW BEHIND I SW BEHIND PROPERTY LINE�I I PROPERTY LINE 142' R/19 b--- --d—r— I� 20' I 44' 14' 44' •20' CENTRAL I PARKWAY s'sw EF 12' 12' 12' I 12 112 112 4 8' IS' SW li (ARNOLD ROAD TO HACIENDA DRIVE) I �— N.T.S. TASSAJARA ROAD (FROM ROUTE 580 TO DUBLIN BLVD.) N.T.S. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) Ruggeri cn and DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 JOB NO.: 961069 Jhociates 9901 OWENS DRIVE SUITE 155 • PLEASANTON.CA 94559 �� � ss PHONE(510)227-9100 • FAX(510) 227-9300 91EET 2 OF 2 • Q /II II ■ I GLEASON DRIVE _A — ;;:::;!;!;':l;i:: :p:It::!:!;Hfa:Kps::: ?:!:H.a•....... 10 1 150' , It.l ::::!:?:::::::;::f:::!:?:!:+:•:::i:::;• 1 f I !I 300' SF. DETACHED til:1 � � i /,�. _ 1`•� 1600' ..... N.T.S. 1; 1 ``' — ---,:."'....•' :._ ____- �, °z I =. -!— 1700' :ill tr COMMERCIAL U ' SF DETACHED `j • 11j 1 -� PARK ;I O 11111' - j _-ff ... \ o i! 111 SC110W = � tlC i1 1 1E -=I 501 NN RR LL AR cowman. ►;: ;:::..............1X50:.• I 10D' X50' 600' Bon' =1- G(TRANSIT SPINE) — ,Il.-.•i:::f::.::: :• ` i:!:; _ = 1500' 500' 1450 it fAY[r =1 1500' 500' co man-nu/LT 11 = ~ I 1RR n-FAIKY — = CCU�EROA[ ii Afa ; I SF OE TARED II g�� 1 SF. DETACHED i -- ---DllsL�_ -�_ ::;_ ep,� l= 1700' 500' 1400' I 7400' �''W - - - - •�Iii i = _ •.;.:.:•:•:•••••••••.•••.••:.:.:.:.:•....... : :: ::• .1I` : =- _ CT.ZMROAC COMMERCIAL - c�auERCaAt..., ..qs a r =__ _.:..,„._ . .. ..._,._ ......_ ..... .,„„ _____, .. ....___________ __,._,.. . HIGHWAY ROUTE SOO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 Ruggeri - LEGEND Cnsen and ® TASSAJARA CREEK LANDSCAPE AREA SSOCI$tC5 STREET FRONTAGE LANDSCAPE AREA (SANTA R I TA AREA) A RI 6601 PHONE(510)227-9100 7-91 155 •FAX(5ANTON.CA 9 588 e_•ccccSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY DATE: AUGUST 7, 1996 JOB NO.: 961069 PHONE(S10)7I7-9100 PAX(510)277-9J00 •> SHEEN 1pF 2 . • 1 PART B AN ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST OF THE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) The budget for the Ultimate Improvement shall be $317,756/YR. It is estimated that the budget for the fiscal year 1997/98 will be in the amount of $39,411. 1997-1998 Ultimate 1997-1998 1997-98 Ultimate Ultimate Maintenance Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance Areas Areas Cost/SF Cost/Yr. Cost/SF Cost/Yr. A. Landscaped Areas (maintenance) 1. Dublin Blvd.Area (51,800 SF) (189,100 SF) $0.30 $15,540 $0.30 $56,730/Yr. 2. 'Transit Spine'Area (9,100 SF) (53,700 SF) $0.30 $2,730 $0.30 $16,110/Yr. 3. Gleason Drive Area (0.00 SF) (48,100 SF) $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $14,430/Yr. 4. Arnold Road Area (0.00 SF) (11,600 SF) $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $3,480/Yr. 5. Hacienda Drive Area (6,300 SF) (42,100 SF) $0.30 $1,890 $0.30 $12,630/Yr. 6. Tassajara Rd. Area (0.00 SF) 144,800 SF) $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $13,440/Yr. Total Area: 67,200 SF 389,400 SF $20,160/Yr. $116,820/Yr. B.Tassajara Creek 1. Trail Maintenance (0.00 SF) (45,000 SF) $0.06 $0.00/Yr. $0.06 $2,700/Yr. 2. Creek Landscape (0.00 SF) (895,000 SF) $0.08 $0.00/Yr. $0.08 $71,600/Yr. 3. Trail Connections (0.00 SF) (17,000 SF) $0.36 $0.00/Yr. $0.36 $6,120/Yr. _ Total: $80,420/Yr. C.Soundwalls 1. Repair and Maint. (1,600 SF) (7,100 SF) $6,400/Yr. $28,400/Yr. D.Dublin Blvd:Trail (46,800 SF) $0.06 $2,808/Yr. E.Sidewalk 1. Dublin Blvd.Area (30,300 SF) $0.05 $1515/Yr. _ 2. _ 'Transit Spine'Area (56,500 SF) $0.05 $2,825/Yr. 3. Gleason Drive Area (37,000 SF) - $0.05 $1,850/Yr. 4. Arnold Road Area (12,800 SF) $0.05 $640/Yr. 5. Hacienda Drive Area (32,350 SF) $0.05 $16,175/Yr. 6. Tassajara Rd.Area (15.450 SF) $0.05 $773/Yr. Total: (184,400 SF) $9,220/Yr. F.Vandalism Repair-all planting area: $3,500/Yr. $14,000Nr. G.Water 1. All Planting $4,000Nr. $23,364Nr. Page 5 It 1997-1998 Ultimate 1997-1998 1997-98 Ultimate Ultimate Maintenance Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance Base Unit Maintenan Areas Areas Cost/SF Cost/Yr. Cost/SF Cost/Yr. H. Power 1. Controllers $300/Yr. $2,000/Yr. Subtotal: $34,360/Yr. $277,032/Yr. I. Administration Fees 1. City of Dublin Administration ©8% $2,749/Yr. $22,163/Yr. 2. County Fees for Collection of Assessments @ 1.7% $584/Yr. $4,709/Yr. 3. Delinquency Factor 5% $1,718/Yr. $13,852/Yr. $5,051/Yr. $40,724/Yr. Total: $39,411/Yr. $317,756/Yr. Assessment per Acre, 1997-98 (85.6 Acres) $460.41/Yr. Assessment per Acre Ultimate (447.6 Acres) $710.00/Yr. The annual levy of assessment shall be established as a range between $0.00 and $710.00 per developed acres. However, the maximum amount of the assessment of$710.00 per developed acre., shall be increased annually, beginning on January 1, 1998, by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index (applies to all costs except water and electricity), plus any increase in the cost of water and electricity. If the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Index is-unavailable or deemed by the City Council to be inappropriate, a comparable consumer price index, as approved by the City Council, shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Index. • Page 6 . 2 PART C ASSESSMENT ROLL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) ASSESSMENT AND LOT AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT FOR NUMBER PROPERTY OWNERS ACRES LOTS 1997-98 TAX YEAR Per Acre Per Lot TOTAL 1 Remainder of Undeveloped Surplus Property 362 $0.00 $0.00 Parcel Authority of Alameda County 2 Lots 1-154 (Single Family)of Unknown 21.9 154 $460.41 $65.472 $10,082.76 Tract 6822 3 Lots 155-277 (Townhomes) Unknown 7.7 122 $460.41 $29.058 $3,545.08 of Tract 6822 4 Parcels 1, 2, and 3 of Parcel Unknown 56 $460.41 $25,782.40 Map 6879 TOTAL: _ $39,410.24 Page 7 3 PART D METHOD OF SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) The maximum developed acre assessment will be $710 per year, based on a total of 389,400 square footage of street improvements and a total of 957,000 square footage of creek improvements and 447.6 acres of developed property at buildout of all property within the District. The cost of the Improvements will be divided equally among the total number of developed properties within the boundaries of the District on a per acre basis. "Developed acres" shall include property which has a recorded final map or parcel map as of July 1st of each year. Each year the City Council shall determine the assessment for that year based on the following: 1. Actual square footage of installed improvements relative to the total amount of square footage of Improvements. 2. Cost of maintenance of installed Improvements ("M"). 3. Total amount of developed acres ("A"). 4. The annual assessment for the developed acres for that year ("M" x "A") shall be spread based on the following: A. Commercial developed area, per acre basis. B. Single-family residential area, per acre basis. C. Multi family residential area, per acre basis. 5. The single-family and multi-family residential area per acre assessment will be spread on a per lot basis based on the number of lots on the final map or parcel map for each particular development. 6. If the assessment in any year would exceed $710 per acre, the amount in excess of$710 shall be assessed to the remaining undeveloped acres on a per acre basis, subject to the maximum developed acre amount. Page 8 7. The maximum developed acre assessment of $710 per year will be increased annually by the percentage increase in the Bay area Urban Wage Earner Price Index (applies to all costs except water and electricity), plus any actual increase in the cost for water and electricity. 8. If the square footage cost of the Improvements will be less than the amount set forth herein (after adjustment in accordance with Paragraph 7), the assessment shall be reduced proportionately to reflect the reduced cost of Improvements in that year. The cost of the Improvements and the total square footage of the Improvements are taken from Part B of the Engineer's Report. The following is an example calculation for a first year and second year assessment scenarios: SAMPLE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS 1. FIRST YEAR A. ASSUMPTIONS Constructed Landscape Area; 50,000 s.f. Constructed Creek Area: .0 s.f.. Maintenance Cost per Square Foot $0.30 Developed Area: 15 Acres Subdivision "A", 100 single-family detached lots 5 Acres Subdivision "B" 70 multi family lots 20 Acres Commercial 40 Acres Total B. ASSESSMENT CALCULATION: . Total Landscape Maintenance Cost=$0.30 x 50,000 S.F.=$15,000 Assessment per Developed Acre=$15,000/40 Acres=$375 per acre Subdivision "A" Assessment=l5 Acres x $375/Acre=$5,625 Subdivision "A" Assessment per lot=$5,625/100=$56.25 per lot Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $375/Acre=$1,875 Subdivision "B" Assessment per unit=$1,875170 lot=$26.79 per lot Page 9 15 • Commercial Assessment= 20 Acres x $375.00 per acre = $7,500 Undeveloped Property Assessment=$0 per acre 2. SECOND YEAR A. ASSUMPTIONS: Constructed Landscape Area 70,000 SF Constructed Creek Area: 400,000 S.F. Maintenance Cost per Square Foot for landscaped area $0.309 Maintenance Cost per Square Foot for creek area $0.0824 Developed Area: 15 Acres (Subdivision "A" 100 Single-Family Detached Lots 5 Acres (Subdivision "B") 70 Multi-Family Lots) 8 Acres (Subdivision "C" 64 Single-Family Lots 7 Acres (Subdivision "D" 140 Multi-Family Lots 20 Acres Commercial 55 Acres Total Undeveloped Area 392.6 Acres Cost of Living Increase: 3% Over Year One Water Cost Increase 3% Over Year One Electrical Cost Increase 3% Over Year One B. ASSESSMENT CALCULATION: Maximum Allowable Assessment=Year One Maximum Assessment + Electrical, Water, & Cost of Living Increases=$710.00 + $21.30=$731.30/Acre Total Max. Allowable Assessment=Max..Assessment x Devel. Acres =$731.30/Acre x 55 Acres=$40,221.50 Maintenance Cost=Landscape Area Cost+ Creek Cost =70,000 x $0.309 + 400,000 x $0.0824=$54,590 Undeveloped Property Assessment=Maintenance Cost - Max. Allow Assessment=$54,590 - $40,221.50=$14,368.50 Page 10 • Undeveloped Property Assessment Per Acre=$14,368.50/392.6 Acres =$36.60/Acre Assessment per Developed Acre=Max. Assessment=$731.30 per Acre Subdivision "A" Assessment=l5 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$10,969.50 Subdivision "A" Assessment per Lot-$10,969.50/100=$109.70 per Lot Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$3,656.50 Subdivision "B" Assessment per Lot=$3,656.50170=$52.24 per Lot Subdivision "C" Assessment= 8 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$5,850.40 Subdivision "C" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,850.40/64491.41 per Lot Subdivision "D" Assessment= 7 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$5,119.10 Subdivision "D" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,119.10/140436.57 per Lot Commercial Assessment= 20 Acres x $731.30/Acre = $14,626 Page 11 PART E PROPERTY OWNERS'S LIST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) Assessment No. Name of Property Owner L1 Surplus Property Authority of Alameda County 224 W. Winton Avenue, Rm 151 Hayward, CA 94544 - - - - - _ Page 12 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) CERTIFICATIONS I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Part B, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on 1996. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment, and the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No , duly adopted by said Council on , 1996. 1, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report with Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County-of Alameda, California on , 1996. Page 13 I:—Rn°/91 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT °n� RE 3382 IM 478 1 °%�'' IN 1�__ ....ova-- R CITY Of DUBLIN CERTIFICATES -N Ntarn A01ro• 'I' Nrode^7__��.' A¢? FILED IN DIE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK THIS u7roTr9ra1 A3 TIJrr9 Z N DAY OF 199_. a� b, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ‘,1 KAY KECK, CITY CLERk PARCEL 2, RE 2439,IM 213 • £1 0 000 1200 MOO 0 4. o CITY OF.DUBLIN Y 1 e797 an' k I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS APPROVED BY 1 1R FM T b.Fr 4147111/� °— THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN Al A r°°"■00o a i UI� REGULAR MEETING THEREOF,HELD ON THE DAY J21.18"~ ZO N OF 199 BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. NN71O7T kj 5 NORW')St 'Nl'n• Z1£ KAY KECK, CITY CLERK S um' CITY OF DUBLIN o' StTdC IZ T��ilia.l�:� �d 1 rve07�J0 w A••utIY /201 LANDS OF CASTERSON �� �=lua��;Ya,� reran 0'fPOO°' N2rxTn M°1to• I SERIES NO. 80-229805 k— L JIQSO' IIM/t 1!411' - I�iJ∎T�S:1�t�2.U1=1=11.3.A)� °fr 01X14 N . Mp70trt ,<' s?!•!u&B�!_;,EI]�tIV.111�•LT N - R7r7177t , ,� AIM fie Ff∎�•lyYt� a n '.'o i \� COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE rr117t711' o Y! O 41sT I "FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF THE —T��y��!'t� W • �I��IA}Yktil.:Mill• Q 61 i A.,uwh• COUNTY OF ALAMEDA• STATE OF CAUFORNIA THIS_ �!>,u_L'Y7muMFIA� Z R R.wa00' '.• DAY OF 199... I���tyyEyi1lR!l� O 1 r I•15(21• .. ^ �TJ♦ iNI.1'•17�U1i)� ^%¢ g R86•118'.1071 1 ,,.r', A ��[�Vii•7!f�1� a j 1 COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER �� ialrly�E j COUNTY OF ALAMEDA W!•�1T12k7�ITAM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' }Vk57��MI ItTI1•t"?'i4Gk7l�ili• 5fr,'" ////iii ..% CENTRAL PARKWAY ,,T\ ITF!•t I1,TlAi!?dD� �4J•�.•'k�LMI 1Il1l�,{11• �=Illt_=!I#f:='I �a I1111�W7rIY1k7111�2fl/MI U 0 11 lill=lilt- _ �. IIIIt . ur.•1>•EIII�7rFrF1� i c 1111 IIII i C M1r717V 1� ?Il•nl malII•.iLmi % 0 11 = : h►\ a1n' COUNTY RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE t 7 ITS —tt1t'1/y'd:•r[k7�L'_te7� I t rnra�t➢� i I11 ►._1' ©, Amvist FILED THIS_DAY OF 199 AT/////////////////�� ' '��/%'i nr ,;,,' � 1(l.rJ' THE HOUR OF _O'CLOCK _.M.IN BOOK ��%'�" OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AT PAGE N7H,Lt ''�' �/ �„ THEREOF IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF 212m' P PU NM wvtr { THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA.STATE OF CALIFORNIA.• I 2114' I I II %M 108M PARCEL ® I PARCEL'DUI �a oat FEE: SERIES NO. - - IN uI 1... 12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I,1', 1, 1 PARCEL THREE , , ,.. ,•,. . ,•, . ., LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Aa,1Yf I IJ 'PM 11+1 L� 12 FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 97-1 112-1, NOW• I • /1 i ROI 4.444 STATE OF CALIFORNIA • (SANTA RITA AREA) III 1 u • HIGHWAY ROUTE 000 10 17 EI CITY OF DUBLIN u0 u ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LEGEND RUGGERI - JENSEN AND ASSOCIATES ..■ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY CIVIL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS LOT ORE • P1PA3ANTON.CAIIT'ORTIM - TASSAJARA CREEK LANDSCAPE AREA ACCUSE 1090 • ® STREET IRDIIIACE LANDSCAPE AREA 108 NO.901071.10 SHARE 1 OF 1 MIMS PART F !` y CITY CLERK File # - • AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 1996 SUBJECT: Petition Requesting Formation of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 97-1 Report Prepared by: Public Works Director Lee Thompson EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Resolution Initiating Proceedings 2) Petition, including Engineer's Report and Diagram RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution initiating proceedings FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No assessments are proposed for FY 1996-97. The estimated assessment for FY 1997-98 is $39,411, or$460.40 per acre (based on 85.6 acres), depending on the extent of landscaping that is installed for that year. Additional financial information is provided . in the Description below. Assessments are subject to review and approval of the City Council on an annual basis through the required public hearing process. DESCRIPTION: The.Development Agreement between the City,the Surplus Property Authority of Alameda_County, and Kaufman&Broad (K&B) for the California Creekside residential project provides that the Surplus Property Authority and K&B will take action to assure that the cost of maintenance of street and creek landscaping is paid by the individual lot owners (Development Agreement, Exhibit B,page xii.). One of the mechanisms identified in the Development Agreement is a Landscape and Lighting Assessment District. The Development Agreement further provides that, consistent with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan,the Surplus Property Authority will take action to assure that purchasers of any remaining portions of the of the Santa Rita property will pay their proportionate share of maintenance costs for street and creek landscaping. Pursuant to these provisions of the Development Agreement, the Surplus Property Authority and K&B have proposed the formation of a Landscape and Lighting Assessment District covering the entire Santa Rita property as the selected mechanism. COPIES TO: Pat Cashman,Alameda Co. Steve Hicks;K&B Joseph Azar, Ruggeri-Jensen FM _ ITEM NO. g:\assessdist197-I\agstfrm I nl The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority has, therefore, submitted a petition to form an assessment district to fund street landscape maintenance and utility costs for the Santa Rita development area. This area is bounded by Arnold (Sebille) Road on the west, Gleason Drive on the north, Tassajara Road on the east, and Dublin Boulevard on the south, as shown on the assessment diagram included with Exhibit 2. The scope of work includes maintenance of roadside landscaping for Dublin Boulevard, Hacienda Drive, the"transit spine," a portion of Arnold (Sebille) Road, and a portion of Gleason Drive, plus the maintenance of the trail and landscaping along the Tassajara Creek channel, as delineated in the scope of work on Page 1 and 2 of the petition. At this time, the Surplus Property Authority is the only property owner within the proposed area of assessment. As various properties are sold and developed, the new property owners would be assessed according to the formula set forth in the petition and Engineer's Report. It is proposed that the cost of maintenance be spread equally among the property owners on a per-acre basis. In the case of single- family or multi-family residential developments,the assessment would be based on the total acreage of the development, divided equally among the single-family or multi-family housing units. (If a residential development contains both single- and multi-family units, the proportion between the two housing types may be different, based on their relative areas divided by the number of units for each density category.) The estimated assessment for the 1997-98 fiscal year is $39,411, or$460.40 per acre, based on 85.6 acres anticipated to be developed at that time. The ultimate assessment at buildout is estimated to be $317,756, or$710 per acre, based on 447.6 acres, and based on 1996-97 unit costs. • The petition further specifies that the maximum developed acre assessment will be increased annually by the percentage of increase of the Consumer Price Index (San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners), insofar as non-utility costs are concerned. Any actual increase in utility costs will also be passed on to the properties as part of the assessment. Any costs in excess of the total maximum allowable assessment of developed properties would be assessed to the Surplus Property Authority's remaining undeveloped property. The petition proposes a formula for calculating the assessment at buildout of the Santa Rita property. As such, once the initial assessment is levied, it will merely be necessary for the Council to annually determine the amount of the assessment by applying the formula. The schedule for formation of this assessment district provides that Staff will return to the City Council at the August 13th meeting with a proposed resolution for formation of the District, and that public hearings will be held on September 10th and October 8th. There will be no assessment for Fiscal Year 1996-97. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution initiating proceedings for Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 97-1. • • a _ _/,: e • _ ^ e.• • . . �' _ • - _ •_ ' - .. - • ]�•ii.e degree right now. On motion of Cm. Burton se • 4 - -: •t m. Howard, and by unanimous vote, the Council aut • • -. e ity Manager to continue with the efforts outlined in the r=.." _ • _ - ' • _ , _ . - ' . - • -- `• . PETITION REQUESTING FORMATION OF • LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 97-1 9:31 p.m. 8.4 (360-20) Ms. Silver presented the Staff Report and advised that the Development Agreement between the City, the surplus Property Authority of Alameda County, and Kaufman & Broad for the California Creekside residential project provides that the Surplus Property Authority and K&B will take action to assure that the cost of maintenance of street and creek landscaping is paid by the individual lot owners. The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority is proposing to have a Landscaping & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District formed over their lands in Eastern Dublin to maintain the roadside landscaping on major roadways within their property as well as the trail and landscaping improvements along Tassajara Creek. The area is bounded by Arnold (Sebille) Road on the west, Gleason Drive on the north, Tassajara.Road on the east, and 1-580 on the south. The Staff Report incorrectly identified Dublin Boulevard on the south. Mr. Silver advised that at this time,the Surplus Property Authority is the only property owner within the proposed area of assessment. As various properties are sold and developed, the new property owners would be assessed according to the formula set forth in the petition and Engineer's Report. It is proposed that the cost of maintenance be spread equally among the property owners on a per-acre basis. The estimated assessment for the 1997-98 fiscal year is $39,411, or $460.40 per acre, based on 85.6 acres anticipated to be developed at that time. The ultimate assessment at buildout is estimated to be $317,756, or $710 per acre, based on 447.6 acres, and based on 1996- 97 unit costs. The schedule for formation of this assessment district provides that Staff will return to the City Council at the August 13th meeting with a proposed resolution for formation of the District, and that public hearings will be held at the first meetings in September and October: There will be no assessment for FY 1996-97. Ms. Silver showed a slide of how the assessment would be calculated. Pat Cashman stated there had been a lot of careful work and give and take on this; bringing three perspectives together. It will be a mathematical calculation in the CITY COUNCIL MINUTE. VOLUME 15 REGULAR MEETING EXHIBFT. 5 July 23, 1996 a3 PAGE 386 future subject to caps. It will not be subject to litigation. The amounts are fair and he stated they are fully in support of this. Mayor Houston asked how this district will be different and not subject to litigation. Ms. Silver stated there are 4 exceptions from the procedural requirements and one of the 4 is if you have a district formed pursuant to a petition being signed by all property owners. This district would be subject to this exception. Mr. Cashman stated it is based on the calculation and it will never be deemed an increase. Mr. Ambrose stated there is also a backup. Ms. Silver advised that there is another mechanism to implement the provisions of the development agreement that we propose and to which the Surplus Property Authority has agreed. We will record a deed restriction or covenant against the property and they've agreed that the property would be subject to deed assessment. In the event the landscaping and lighting assessment is not in existence, the deed assessment would then spring to life and it would be an identical assessment as part of the Landscaping and Lighting Act. This would ensure that it would not have to come from the City's General Fund. Mr. Cashman stated given this proposal and given the cap, they may find themselves with 200 acres of landscaping out there. The Surplus Property Authority has agreed that the balance of its vacant property would be subject to an additional fee. Mayor Houston commented once the property is fully developed, this would go away. Cm. Burton asked what the word undeveloped means. Ms. Silver stated it would be properties for which there is a final map as of July 1st of each year. It would be properties that are improved but not developed. The definition would be where a final map has been adopted. Mr. Cashman advised that they have 100 acres of public land in their development. Ms. Silver stated each year until buildout we need to determine the amount of assessment for landscaping in place. We only want to assess the developed property. Mr. Ambrose stated the Surplus Property Authority felt this was preferable to homeowners associations, which were explored in depth. • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 15 REGULAR MEETING ,/ July 23, 1996 27 Par_F R27 • Cm. Moffatt stated this is all subject to the courts. It hasn't been used before. It is a unique plan. Mr. Cashman stated it is a unique plan with safeguards in place for the homeowner. There are maximums and caps restraining the future political ability to change this. It appears to be protective against the provisions of the initiative. Mr. Ambrose stated this district does not contain lighting. Cm. Moffatt asked if there is any way to consolidate all the landscaping and lighting assessment districts. Mr. Ambrose explained that one of the conditions is to not have new development impact the existing City. There are a lot of things to consider, especially in light of the potential initiative. Anything can be litigated. Cm. Moffatt asked if we have a fall back position. Mr. Ambrose stated the position will be a fall back on the deed. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Barnes, and by unanimous vote, the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 96 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1 (SANTA RITA AREA) 9:56 p.m. 8.5 (580-40) Police Chief Rose presented the Staff Report and advised that the U.S.D- .-rtment of Justice is making funds available through a Local Law Enforcem- :lock Grants Program. This program allocates funds to local governme• cased on the number of Part I crimes reported in the jurisdiction-during the - 3 years.- The purpose is to provide local government with funds to under • e projects to reduce crime and improve public safety. Dublin is eligibl- .r $13,999 in grant funds and the City would need to make a 10% ($1,3•' match. We will have to establish some kind of an advisory committee. Mr. Ambrose ad. -i we are trying to get details from the Cops grant from the State. They've co,•' ioned.it with strings. We haven't figured out how we can fit this in yet. We . • still looking at the issue of whether or not the money will be ongoing from the - =-- - _: - •• - ■• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 15 REGULAR MEETING. July 23, 1996 i) PAGE 388