Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.2 MAD 86-1 Public Hear CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: July 25, 1994 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District No. 86-1 (Villages at Willow Creek) Report by: Public Works Director Lee Thompson EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) / Engineer's Report 2) � Resolution approving engineer's report, confirming diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment 3) / Assessment diagram 4) �Newsletter sent to property owners 5) /Budget Change Form RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing 2) Receive Staff report and public comment ?/V‘Nr-- 3) Question Staff and the public 4) Close public hearing and deliberate 5) Adopt resolution approving engineer's report, confirming diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment 6) Authorize Mayor to execute budget change form FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The 1994-95 assessment is proposed to be $84.72 per single- family lot and $42.36 per condominium/townhouse lot. The City's costs for maintaining landscaping within District boundaries are reimbursed by the District. This is the same as last year's assessment. DESCRIPTION: State Law provides that if an assessment is being increased over the previous year's assessment, the City must hold two public hearings and publish notices at least 45 days prior to the second public hearing. Since the proposed 1994-95 assessment is the same as the 1993-94 assessment, only one public hearing is required. Staff has complied with the 10-day posted and published noticing that is required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. As part of the review and approval of the 145-unit single family development (Ridgecreek) and the other, multi-family Villages, certain landscaping maintenance was made a condition of approval. This assessment district was formed for the purpose of providing that landscape maintenance as an alternative to providing the maintenance through a homeowners' association. The City Council approved formation of the District on November 10, 1986, with the initial assessment in Fiscal Year 1987-88. Scope of Work The scope of work for this assessment district includes maintenance of common landscaping improvements within and adjacent to the Villages at Willow Creek Development. Landscaping is located on the west side of Dougherty Road from south of Amador Valley Boulevard to the northerly City Limit, along Amador Valley Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Wildwood Road, along the west side of Wildwood Road and Fall Creek Road, on Willow Creek Drive, and certain landscaped areas within the Ridgecreek (single-family) development. The work performed includes bedding maintenance and pruning, irrigation systems, right-of-way fencing, walls, and entrance signs and trash removal. The District's boundaries include all of Tract 5511. Not included in the scope of work for the assessment district are park maintenance (funded by the City), creek right-of-way maintenance (was previously performed and funded by the developer and has been taken over by Zone 7 Flood Control), and maintenance of landscaping improvements within air I ITEM NO. 642 COPIES TO: CITY CLERK • FILE Lzl ei 0 apartment or townhouse developments (performed and funded by individual homeowners' associations or property owners). Proposed Assessment This year's assessment is proposed to be $84.72 per single-family lot and $42.36 per multi-family lot. This is the same as last year's assessment. This assessment is artifically low, as Staff is again proposing to use a portion of the reserve fund to offset the higher actual District cost. At the time that the Preliminary Engineer's Report was prepared, the figures used did not reflect the 3% labor rate increase that was subsequently approved for MCE Corporation. The figure for the cost of maintenance has consequently been adjusted upward by $720.00 for the final Engineer's Report, and the,reserve figure adjusted downward a like amount to compensate for the 3% rate increase and still maintain the assessment at the same level. A budget change form for the additional appropriation of$720 is attached as Exhibit 5. The total reserve proposed to be utilized for FY 1994-95 is therefore $9,609. As of the date this report was written, Staff had received no formal protests to the proposed assessment. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the resolution approving the Engineer's Report and authorize the budget change. a:(ad)186-1186-1;h Page 2 • CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1986-1 (TRACT 5511) FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTENTS 1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs, Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning. 2. Assessment Diagram. rte;t'A ? e .° J?'TE eg„ :4 t. e Cn QisKepor 1 ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on February 14, 1994, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1986-1 for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq., of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1) (2) (3) As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance $ 66,020.00 $ 66,740.00 $ Incidental Expenses $126,868.08 $126,148.08 $ TOTAL COST: $192,888.08 $192,888.08 $ Estimated 1994-95 Interest Income Applied to 1994-95 Operating Costs: $ 6,300.00 $ 6,300.00 $ Est. Surplus from 1993-94 Fiscal Year $131,393.00 $131,393.00 $ NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 $ 55,195.08 $ 55,195.08 $ As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached . and by reference made a part hereof. Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or 2 parcels respectively from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1994- 95 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "unknown" opposite the number of each lot of parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment. Dated: City Engineer • 3 4 ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 1994-95 is as follows: Maintenance 1. Weeding, fertilizing, pruning, plant replacement, irrigation system: $--47j280,00 $48,000.00 2. Utilities: 18,740.00 $--663020.00 $66,740.00 Incidentals 1. Engineer's Report and proceedings: $ 1,769.00 2. Cost of Collection (County of Alameda): 938.32 3. Delinquencies: 1,656.76 4. Contingencies/Reserve: -1225504:00 $121,784.00 $-1267868:08 $126,148.08 TOTAL: $192,888.08 5 SCOPE OF WORK The following areas are to be maintained by this Maintenance Assessment District: 1) The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of the street for the entire length of Willow Creek Drive. 2) Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 37, 38, and south of Lot 145, all within Tract 5511. 3) Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard between Dougherty Road and Wildwood Road. 4) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Wildwood Road. 5) Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard adjacent to Lot 150. 6) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west and north sides of Fall Creek Road. 7) Roadside landscaping and emergency access surfacing at the north end of Crossridge Road within the street right-of-way. • 4 ASSESSMENT ROLL Amount of Assessment Assessment & Lot No. Property Owners 1994-95 Tax Year Lots 1-145 (Village VI) Unknown 145 lots $84.72/lot = $12,284.40 Lot 150 (Village I) Unknown 56 units $42.36/unit = 2,372.16 Lot 151 (Comm'1. Corner) Unknown 4 units $84.72/unit = 338.88 Lot 149 (Village II) Unknown 248 units $42.36/unit = 10,505.28 Lot 148 (Village III) Unknown 224 units $42.36/unit = 9,488.64 Lot 146A (Village IV) Unknown 135 units $42.36/unit = 5,718.60 Lot 146B (Village V) Unknown 204 units $42.36/unit = 8,641.44 Lots 152-177 (Vill. VII) Unknown 138 units $42.36/unit = 5,845.68 $55,195.08 6 METHOD OF APPORTIONING Each single family lot shall be assigned a benefit unit of one (1), each multifamily unit assigned a benefit unit of one-half(1/2), the commercial lot shall have a benefit unit of four (4), and the open space lots shall have a benefit unit of zero. This gives the following benefit units and apportionments for each Village for this Fiscal Year: Number of Benefit % of Total Living Units Units Assessment Lot 150 Village I 56 28 4.30 Lot 149 Village II 248 124 19.03 Lot 148 Village III 224 112 17.19 Lot 146A Village IV 135 67.5 10.36 Lot 146B Village V 204 102 15.66 Lots 1-145 Village VI 145 145 22.26 Lots 152-177 Village VII 138 69 10.59 Lot 151 Commercial 0 4 0.61 Lots A - D Open Space 0 0 0.00 Total: 1,150 651.5 100.00 7 CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column (1), with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 8, 1994. A if I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby ce fy that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 44-94 duly adopted by said Cs n it on Jun-,r 1994. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certi / that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -94, duly adopted by said Council on July 25, 1994. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a certified copy of the Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on , 1994. 8 4 RESOLUTION NO. -94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 (VILLAGES AT WILLOW CREEK) WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 12-94, a Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 86-1 (the "District"), this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said report was made and filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by this Council and found to be sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was determined that said report should stand as Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforesaid Resolution and that July 25, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, was appointed as the time and place for a hearing by the Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment, notice of which hearing was mailed, published and posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.6; and WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, said hearings were held, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters pertaining to said levy were heard and considered by this Council, and this Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order said levy and confirmation of diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the report of said engineer to pay the cost and expenses thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve that: (a) The property owners owning more than fifty percent of the area of assessable land within the District had not, at the conclusion of said hearing, filed written protests against the said proposed levy, or against the Engineer's Estimate of costs and expenses, or against the maps and description, or against the diagram or the assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof; (b) The public interest, convenience, and necessity require that said levy be made; (c) The District benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map thereof filed in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of July, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST:. City Clerk a:(ad)186 J 186-llevy ' a,a F LM 31.AIN1 efrt4[Sf 021rt Oal. WWI [++C rH70ar 700 7vn w 33. CAHN MAW ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM N 17•40•N•V 55.16 1 N•M•N• :.N 76.54 14.00 70.71 X 63.12'02•[ X 17•40•711•11 •16.63 N'N•N• W.N 7/26.7I 175.71 554.21 X 73•11•11•2 y!(" - X N•41'N•I M.N M•M'M• 461.N N1.M 145.63 MAO X 75.55•63.E 1 X M•A•N'N 15.55 33•63•33' 15.63 75.0[ M.00 75.71 X q•Y'w'r ^A,/-1 * , Street Lighting Maintenance N 63•00'63.7. MOM 5•Is'Be IMS.N 10.63 47.63 N.56 X 53.51 47'9 J v • . X M'w•NY 121.115 O.14•14• 16111.115 463.63 215.73 431.59 5 M•17.44'E SITE •` 1. Assessment District 86-1 X M'w•w•V 110.03 SEWN. 63.11 I18.16 IMAM 515.15 N n'11•M'1 X:•111•:'1 M.If ✓ N 15.17.14.E 163.16 1I �z �, CITY OF DUBLIN X IS'rt'w•E 163.15 X NI'011'111.1 MOM Ham.. f 11 1111•45'1111'11 N.11 •X 9•1'4•1•N•11 15.63 .ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA N If•33•N•11 818.17 X 17'11•:•2 864.63 x1/15[ x7. •v 151 Y/C/AI/Tr,NAP N N•N•N' 163.11 X:V•OS'S 133.11 �.a 7.»I r� �Y(• FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 N N•M•rt•I wee !CAL(AN MEI N w'w'N'S RCM `CAL`I T.tOO. , CARP PARKS t . ppUp)IERTY R OAO 14 ''A7 4157. • rouNS u4rto4 eo[evrr �` roA7tilrr'n-1• - o _11 r $ DISTRICT .. r.. '^ .. 1 LOT 'C' ` 1 �[ir_ yJl �.- ) W or 'F' BOUNDARY J�'Y'r X1'88 I + � ...`~ MI�:llYFY:114 Ti IL: -' .1t t'FrYFY'3i` , J-+ El sue. _ .. �• ��� N 1 '� ROAD I -- r Alt./ 1lJ,�, �' pppONERTI 1 R• 7..7..15 f nl.0 -- __ -: 1 __ - r. . A-N p' L'�' MIptNINO a~ n Y 11 I 11 1 E 8 B ~~ N70fN/hGTY ROAD . ... I IWU1 •t• . It I I SEE DETAIL C 11 co, SEE DE AIL D 148 A Il •'I` SHEET 3 or 3 0 tor 'B' \ I� 150 /46 B RpP ��F•1 9 •,� - B1+EE7 . , •\� \ Sit. �I a �� \ y� 1(l C\ .7.Y 45 r.. O��J ` . ., 1/1!7.[63.4_ \ \ \ I \ \ y \ VI. CREEK �� n •���'�\ //( , . m `�. \'Nrr1rrrri11111111111•111111•1111111111_110111, /� DU/ �� , -_ \ SEE DETAIL B \' . c+Ara�a�©�E'7.CIRE \ s">,f.. .• _ SHEET 2 OF 7 i¢`• �� ��© ���� SEEDETAILA \\\ e. .\\` \ / ,'� .,,orb'S '©� Np DY S �WR .C�©13��� o SHEET 2 OF 3. ` . __' ROAD ' ��© a' EE'�r OR j LOT ,©©©©®® einat A© ® � .\ j LOT •G_� D 41ir n//iefiiiiiitilligivia,CF ©©� ®lanaD '•'• 1 w •• 1 if,.:,,,, 47 LOl 41 NTRICT 1/10� •' 142�le neres AnD sout+D DCSCRIP'1'ION or ��/ THIS D28TRICT ARE TIIC SANE AS THOSE ����� / ALAREOA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL WATER CONSERVATION 0/STRICT SHOWN FOR TRACT 5511 EXCI, IE [ PARCEL-C.SERIES Np.84-076954 PARCEL 146 IS EXCLUDED AND I I. TIOIE INTERIOR OIHCNSIOt13AR M DI STRICT BOUNDARY ON TRACT'HAP 5511,-TRACT MAP 5700. C,^.4••. .y•4 JUNE, 1905 REVISION: ASSESSMENT• X41 DISTRICT LOT 147 DIVIDED INTO TUTS i>. {^�'' ��,[ 152 THROUGH 177 AND LOTS I THROUGH •)� I H. LOT 145 DIVIDED INTO LOTS 140A C, �...ti ,1 LOT 1115 TRACT 4719--148 N 41 AHD LOT 1400. �:�?`:5 "'''41.,A JUNE, 1989 RLV ISIDNI ASSESSMENT• (<..`'/:i••,t/`C,1� DISTRICT LOTS 146k AND 1400 WERE ';�' BASIS of, BEARING! JUNE, 1991 REVISION: ASSESSMENT ANNEXED INTO THE DISTRICT. LOT ^l�f' ",1,';;L • DISTRICT LOT 146A DIVIDED INTO 20 149, AND LOTS 152-177 i LOT! L-N ■ - , M LM 31TKM M F750 ITKrt Io4KHft LOTS (19 BUILDING AND 1 COMMON WERE SUBDIVIDED INTO CONDOMINIUMS 1 '•'h r,.�^`,i:. b 44447.8 o.IrR CtvFA AREA). ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOTS 16 AS SHOWN ON SHEET 2, DETAILS B AND F;� ^y;`; �:."7 07. Pt•,l LLCM•M N7410D LM N 016091Y NOM AND 17 ON DETAIL A. SHEET 2 DIVIDED A RESPECTIVELY. LOTS 77-79 AND ,.,r I( •,,•+-+•_^j INTO LOTS 194-200 LOTS 201-205 LOTS B,C,E,F AND O WERE ADJUSTED J I UMW M Nt1•WW1/. MI 7.5.4675 RESPECTIVELY FOR LOT LINES. x•;�: �;;ti+';I§ 5874 IN 15716 7431 57. SHEET I OF 3 v garg)-':.3 ;7.r, s CD334e 1(34 . ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM S. Street Lighting Maintenance a Assessment District 86-1 ) ,,,;„9, 511ADY • "4' CREEK .. „• .0 ,.e, • •• ic /t m''• CITY OF DUBLIN• _ �!/, , ,6 I]11.17 li®' 0 ►��' I_�,��i�i�,,� �, '"0_'., 'E .r(0 okat •d' ' "'•° ' Q ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA •�r ,.— •:�;; .r ;- f FISCAL YEAR 1 99�-95•I ,r\l�,•.1� tat.v�r,.°.a 1iJ cetr]b-,...: ,A z "a C'1, t. �r ere„erws/ �"'CP':"'''..'€ e, � 1"�,�w`St r SCALE: 1'- 200' (D Cs a,_ e c (� rte, •I ar.r,.r ;ar a O D' !/$ .r I;;(.,,43 4' P+� •,..:V'.• cr a' u �5 0” era P Lj, .; ti (�l • a]' 7 i 1 e/o e tO phi- °b 6% ------5.,, lt.,r 75, •ri:,., • ;•C ‘,..,,/ (14- , fi. . QCs •,„. :va 31q•,t Y'r FAG "I yrAN't[../`•■•' ll f •``� o ll�%��e0, 88888®— "r ' Crl ;t ,,I1-)I ��r= t i ° c fr��J ♦ N 4 r Y (i)9''� • . I`' .. S!`1 /1 (• •11➢./ Sg+-1 6• � r�.1. .a•-:Y7:..2 i d.°, 11.+4.Nr ! 0 i44 f E %6 Ci'' °�e / rV° e, n r a,/, 'v`a��J'�'I'Y ,,'.1::,. ""[).. ry1 i t/1 f44• /YO Ortili • r r • ♦ a(.. I Ot i, .. ti,v(/l, �- e 7 wa,4. e� % a ♦ T ,7® '�©�C'./ 1 t e,'aJ,i� -�l rat, c� ��'�/,t ,-`Tin•' 0., ft"�Cr�1ej �rS/r •r� M1 � p +4,/N _' C L k.._r'' a'.l • P N t Pe N 4 ,88. ,,' y..\ •,�1' DETAIL A MOTES,' ,a„� tr c..�..@ ,.. `jwa�Cll•./ „rl' 1 , /,oo,,./rl + /��l o c c r' at]~ w THE ASSEBEMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE �\. ,r 0888 e`i�• r a p CONPOS ED OFI a) A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED BY A n I • e I•n•, !��ee° o�'�e , wvnn • N•�` • HYPNLM AND IACR INDIVIDUAL UNIT XDNDER, OR b) }.f^a��l'r� I,ro,../ t�_1�M `-rl���� (1\r Ii ,e A LOT XVND[E ►O CLONED DY A MYPN[N AND TIIE , (('J �I „'�� I✓�” lJ r�� `j w .f1, O` •r,., L[TraRe •cola(• FOR DVIIDINO CONNON AREAS, OR ��'/a Q,`6 0 I LJo !,� • c fl',r a jj'- r ) o) A LETTER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE �'' ,, St c��r u LETTERS .00•171° FOR GENERAL COMMON AREAS. t 1J •e/ •.,61•,°, # 9, ' 11,o • r 8s, -a D,• re''.Nil w Iv. ,.4 N o r, DETAIL B NaYEDI '1 I e -,,,..•� J r ' . r ul Qw�l1j,r e u +Or• THE SED ED DM[NT DISTRICT 7! DI LOT LDINERO ARE �-• t® • o '_1 r/ "� +{ • / ' COMPOSED Olt a) A FOUR DIGIT BUILDING NUMBER +7_ "p�,p, ! ! /1, ' ' e y •• FOLIOSE!) BY EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT LETTER, OR ''T \�j ._ _. -,ra- /• b) AN AREA LETTER FOLIOSED BY A HYPHEN r AND 1/�'.r�i t.) + /,'C�l Tine LETTERS•COID1• FOR THE COMMON AREAS. e(14?-1.,"::'CJ (. Jo .t •) 1'I •.BLVD. EXAMPLES: A ,0 O. �+ U•\-C qty ECM Il 7I COMN ASSESSMENT ' E ,g'. a H ASSESSMENT �'!,�` -�{. AREA DISTRICT ` fill • DETAIL A O O 0�\ NUMBER r 0 1g a DISTRICT •0,. r� A,, • ''::fi .60 68 70 71 7] NUMBER At \J1p 107 IOa 109 110 111` 71-00101 BLDG 6570 NUMBER �'•F c�' ■ � l 21-111. •1.J'' (1)_ [-LOCO( N 65700 DETAIL B COMM• AR M—coca( SHEET 2 OF 3 • C03346 , • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ® • •Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 66-I CITY OF DUBLIN ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2701 FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 RD r1.1i•ocLi� 2782 u�,� �0 n "'a ..A.'+ 00 0000 0® QO0 ,r :,f^fie 1 V 0© 0•�0 S ©GOO 'I , ®�® a.®0�®°^$ ( V Lift 7 4c. ©0.0 0 0 : rc•Q er i . : 4%o avg 0.0 *O• '010,_'4',4',4 ee 1� ' r rt §g fr+ alb.. 4 . I:42 I•� 1, 646.6 0 ti ti 00 00 000 �{ mJ• ,,e mp 0'0°.e ' s... 0 m�o • •r co 000 r WV, ff WODO sic' 000 'c C. �' "I WILD ® � 0,4.*. - 1,, Q ' '''''f"'O0 D , • „• �Q ®rai h ^47 °e roe° 2782 �m .41 'x” DfL;fs i • K 0.D6 „,-OP% ^ ®0m es 41'.F �i' ✓ ei�r. . ��l r ,•• ..� 0 A .e 1 L .•®Oat K e Y1 O©. © a�J ®//'4//�1 a ®�`Q®° Oo ID•C• ,,`I ' c"_: . . 3 "` ;Job ® r°o,(fD�O •,yir.. b f...m• • ';•., 'W 5Dbfro,e., Y r ; 1144 r DETAIL C tu 2791 w�V �0�°' et 4 4 $ �Q, �1 ��y . . z C 00 i ®®„h :.,e Y p l it:r ,11• . ^• ` dq \ y DETAIL D M • WILLOW CRICK DA. • . 1 SHEET 3 OF S 2781 , ■Inowr . _ C0334! • ■ • VILLAGES AT WILLOW CREEK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NEWSLETTER FACTS ABOUT THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT This assessment district was formed in 1986 for the purpose of maintaining certain landscaping improvements within the Villages at Willow Creek development. The following areas are being maintained by the City at the present time: 1. The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of the street for the entire length of Willow Creek Drive. 2. Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 37, 38, south of Lot 145, and at the northerly end of Crossridge Road, all within Tract 5511. 3. Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard between Dougherty Road and Wildwood Road. 4. Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Wildwood Road. 5. Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard adjacent to Lot 150. 6. Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west and north sides of Fall Creek Road. Other common landscaping improvements not included in the assessment district's scope of work are maintained by the homeowners' associations of individual Villages. Landscaping within the Alamo Creek area is maintained by the Alameda County Flood Control District, Zone 7. PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS The assessment for 1994-95 is proposed to remain the same as the 1993-94 assessment. The total district maintenance and utility costs are estimated at$70,384 for Fiscal Year 1994-95, and the total assessment is proposed to be$55,195. The assessment is still artificially low due to the use of reserves that were developed in the early years of the district, plus the use of interest collected on these reserves. The assessment for a single-family home is proposed to be$84.72 per lot, for a condominium or apartment unit, $42.36 each, and for the commercial lot on the southwest corner of Amador Valley and Dougherty Road, $338.88. Again, this is the same as last year's assessment. The funds collected through assessments are accounted for separately from other City funds. These funds can only be used for specified expenses within the boundaries of the Assessment District. Each year, the City is required to notify you of one or more public hearings that are being held regarding the proposed assessment for the upcoming fiscal year. The public hearing notice is included in the envelope with this newsletter. These public hearings are held at regular City Council meetings; this year's hearing is on July 25th. STREET LANDSCAPES As some residents in the District are aware, we have recently been pruning the dead material out of one of the groundcovers (Baccharis). Excessive deadwood is a common problem with Baccharis; however, the plants tend to generate new growth quickly once the pruning occurs. The City has done some replanting recently within the District, and we expect to do more by the end of June. At this time, we are not expecting a significant increase in water rates from the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) for Fiscal Year 1994-95, although this is subject to change. Water availability appears to be stable at this time. The City's maintenance department is very appreciative of those residents who called during the past year to notify us of broken sprinklers and other problems, both in and outside of the District. Please continue to let us know when you see a :.- broken sprinkler, fallen tree, or other landscape or irrigation problem. _ PARK IMPROVEMENTS The cost of park improvements and maintenance is paid by the City and not charged to the assessment district. The City's park masterplans include a number of improvements for the Dougherty Hills Park(the "hill" to the west of the Villages). To date, trails have been cut to allow hiking on the hill. Proposed future projects could provide a parking area along Amador Valley Boulevard, day camp and picnic facilities, restrooms, and naturalized landscaping. Due to the City's present budget constraints, the Five Year Capital Improvement Program currently lists any future plans or improvements for this area as unfunded. VANDALISM The City has experienced an increase in the incidence of vandalism over the past several years. Vandalism has affected the City streets and parks in the form of graffiti, broken or damaged trees and shrubs, broken irrigation heads, and defaced or damaged park furniture and equipment. Our policy is to repair vandalism damage and eradicate graffiti as soon as we become aware of it. If you notice vandalism occurring or are able to provide a description of vandals, please contact Dublin Police Services at 833-6670. If you notice damage or graffiti that has already occurred, please call the Public Works Department at 833-6630. We appreciate your help! We have also received reports from residents that children have been sliding down the hills of the Dougherty Hills Park on pieces of cardboard. This activity should be discouraged, since it is unsafe for the child and may result in increased soil erosion. If you have any questions about the proposed assessment or maintenance activities in this assessment district, or would like to report an irrigation problem which needs attention, please call the City's Public Works Department at 833-6630. CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANGE FORM CHANGE FORM # new appropriation1 i budget transfer 1XX budget change j____1 decrease budget account increase budget account name name DOUGHERTY ROAD A.D. — TREE MAINTENANCE account account # ft 1 - - - $ 1713 - 3040 -740 - 000 $ 100.00 name 011e DOUGHERTY ROAD A. D. —LNDSCP MAINT CONTRACT account # account # 2 - _ _ $ 2 71_3 - 3050 - 740 - 000 $ 620.00 name name account # account # 3 - - - $ 3 $ name name account # account ft 4 - - - 5 4 - - - $ • name name account # account A 5 - - - 5 5 - - - $ name name account # account 4 6 - - - 5 6 - - - $ name name account # account ft 7 - - . - 5 7 - - - $ name name account # account # 8 - - - $ 8 - - - $ TOTAL BUDGET INCREASES S TOTAL BUDGET DECREASES $ REASONS, JUSTIFICATION, AND ITEMIZED COSTS: THE PRELIMINARY 1994/95 BUDGET DID NOT INCLUDE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ADJUSTMENT TO THE MCE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT. THE MAJORITY OF THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MCE AGREEMENT WERE GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES AND THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZED A BUDGET TRANSFER FROM THE CONTINGENT RESERVE. THIS WILL PROVIDE FOR THE USE OF SURPLUS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUNDS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PRESENTED 7/25/94. • . --CITY MANAGER \ \ •• signature date , • CITY COUNCIL 7 \ 25 \ 94 signature PETER W. SNYDER, MAYOR date 7-.7741. 7°'^ T. `^i1 . k M -`, A