The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.1 MAD 83-1 Hear Date CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: June 13, 1988 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Citywide Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 83-1; 1988-89 Levy of Assessments EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) History of Assessment District Costs 2) Engineer's Report 3) Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment 4) Assessment Diagram RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open Public Hearing 2) Receive Engineer's Report and Public Testimony 3) Question Staff and the Public 4) Close Public Hearing and Deliberate 5) Adopt Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Proposed District cost estimate for Fiscal Year 1988-89 is $210,169, including an accumulated reserve for future pole replacement. An estimated $46,919 will be carried over from 1987-88 in the form of reserves. $156,250 will be assessed to property owners for the 1988-89 street lighting costs. Actual accumulated year-end reserves have been as follows: 1984-85 - $15,150 1985-86 - $28,819 1986-87 - $46,919 1987-88 - $46,919 (est.) DESCRIPTION: In 1983, the City Council formed a Citywide Street Lighting Assessment District to replace the County of Alameda Lighting Service Area. On August 13, 1984, the City Council approved the Annual Engineer's Report and ordered levy of assessments for the first time. The District budget for Fiscal Year 1984-85 (the first year) was $116,500. The District expenditures for the subsequent fiscal years and budget for 1988-89 are detailed on Exhibit 1 attached. The 1988-89 District assessment represents an increase of $11,764 (8%) over the Fiscal Year 1987-88. The increase in energy cost is primarily attributable to the increased number of street lights and anticipated increases in energy rates. For Fiscal Year 1987-88, no change is recommended with respect to the method of determining the assessments. The District diagram boundary is proposed to be the same as the City Limits; no annexations were made in the period between March 1, 1987, and February 29, 1988. The actual assessments to property owners will be calculated once the City receives the tax rolls from the County Assessor's Office. Last year's assessment for a single-family house was $18.52. Staff would estimate that the 1988-89 assessment would be about $19.82 for a single-family house based on the proposed assessment. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution as appropriate. ITEM NO. 6. COPIES TO: HISTORY OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS Actual Actual Actual Estimated Budget 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 Energy $ 93,262 $106,878 $110,069 $123,300. $134,000 Engr's Report 7,198 8,315 8,436 8,500 8,500 Cost to Repair • Pole Knockdowns 0 0 0 10,000 10,500 Ttl. Expenditures $100,460 $115,193 $118,505 $141,800 $153,000 Assessments, incl. Co. collection & delinquencies: $116,500 $130,000 $139,000 $144,500 $156,250 Actual collections to City: $111,900 $124,650 $134,776 $133,300 $146,000 Interest: 3,710 4,212 1,829 2,000 2,000 Reimbursement for Poke Knockdowns 0 0 . 0 5,000 ---- 5,000 . Total Income: $115,610 $128,862 $136,605 $141,800 $153,000 ' Year-end increase in reserves: $ 15,150 $ 13,669 $ 18,100 $ 0 $ 0 Accumulated reserves: $ 15,150 $ 28,819 $ 46,919 $ 46,919 $ 46,919 Assessment for Single Family Lot $16.23 $17.60 $18.30 $18.52 $19.82 (est. ) • �,. t, N 1 1 . -2- CITY OF DUBLIN , STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989) , ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTENTS 1. Assessment: Including Estimate of Costs and Method of Apportioning (Assessment Roll under separate cover) 2. Assessment Diagram T cv Clinr, :6 ,:.:.Nr!..::,,)::,-, ,,,,,, -1- ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on April 25, 1988, the City -Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report-for Maintenance Assessment District for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq. of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1) (2) (3) As Filed As .Preliminarily As Finally Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance $ 144,500 $ 144,500 Incidental Expenses $ 65,669 $ 65,669 TOTAL COST: $ 210,169 $ 210,169 1988-89 Interest Income Applied to 1988-89 Operating Costs: $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Reimbursement from Pole Knockdowns $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Surplus from Previous Fiscal Year $ 46,919 . $ 46,919 NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 $ 156,250 $ 156,250 As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said lighting maintenance assessment district and, by reference, the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said lighting maintenance assessment district as they existed as of March 1, 1988, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram by reference. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said lighting maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, - and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. -2- Said assessment is made upon the sçveral lots or parcels of land within said lighting maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively_from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein-are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of _the County of Alameda for the fiscal year. 1988-1989 and includes all of such parcels within the City Limits of the City of Dublin as of March 1, 1988. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because the names. of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "Unknown" opposite the number of each lot or parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment. Dated: City Engineer -3- CITY OF DUBLIN . STREET. LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989 - MAINTENANCE a) Electric Energy (PG & E) -$134,000 b) Replace Pole Knockdowns • - 10,500 - $144,500 . - " -INCIDENTALS a) Engineer's Report and Proceedings $ 8,500 b) Cost of Collection (County) $ 2,600 • c) • Delinquencies - • $ -7,650 c) Contingencies/Pole Replacement Fund $ 46,919 $ 65,669 TOTAL • $210,169 -4- METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT The assessments shall be spread using a method of "factor rates" assigned to different land uses. The establishment of the apportionment of a factor rate of "1". will be calculated by dividing the total assessment of the year by the sum of factor rate numbers assigned wherein the factor rates are .assigned as follows: Use Factor Rate (x 1/2 if vacant) 0 Exempt (Gov't./Utility/etc. ) 0 1 Single Family Residential & Condo 1 2 Small Multiples (2-4 units) 3 3 Commercial 5.5/ac. , . 4 Industrial 5.5/ac. 5 Rural 0.5 6 Institutional 7 Apartments 6 . 8 Commercial - 5.5/ac. 9 Commercial 5.5/ac. • The assessment of each parcel shall be established by multiplying the-factor rate for that parcel by the apportionment for a factor rate of 1. =5- CITY OF DUBLIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column (1) , with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on May 18 1988. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify th t the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto:attached,'was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 73-88, duly adopted by said Council on 5/Z3 , 1988. . Anr.A0s..• IOW I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its. Resolution No. -88, duly adopted by said Council on , 1988. I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that' a certified copy of the assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on , 1988. - -6- RESOLUTION NO. " -88 , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING. LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-1 WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 58-88, a resolution directing preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District, City of Dublin Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (the "district") , this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer and ordered said engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the . Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said report was made and filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by this Council and found to be sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was determined that said report should stand as Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforesaid resolution, and that June 13, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in Meeting Room, Dublin Library, 7606 Amador Valley Blvd. , Dublin, California, were appointed as the time and place for a hearing by the Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment, notice of which hearing was published and posted; and , WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, said hearing was held, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters pertaining to said levy were heard and considered by this Council, and this Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order said levy and confirmation of diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the report of said engineer to pay the cost and expenses thereof; NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve that: a) The property owners owning more than fifty percent of the area of assessable land within the district had not, at the conclusion of said hearing, filed written protests against the said proposed levy, or against the engineer's estimate of costs and expenses, or against the maps and description, or against the diagram or the assessment .to .pay for the costs and expenses thereof; - 6' 3,21 fa b) . The public interest, convenience, and necessity require that said levy be made; c) The district benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map thereof filed in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1988. NOES: ABSENT: Mayor. ATTEST: City Clerk : M L. N1t1V 1 VI/AV RMM } ' • STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE zit: z ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83- I 1,` `; lir: ' • ik�i CITY LIMIT LINE AND CITY OF DUBLIN YS { •/ ASSESSMENT*DISTRICT co�N�� ALAMEDA COUNTY STATE OF CALIFORNIA r;'„~ Og�P GOVN. SANTINA� 8� THOMPSON s e G CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,INC. lizi 1 1040 OAK GROVE ROADk t Or1 R P CITY LIMIT LINE AND 'CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94518 j \ C ASSESSMENT DISTRICT '0.4 \7 .,'''';',"‘:.:3":,'.-';'::”:x: I \ h - PME�P FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 �x BOUNDARY h*\5 Isc.ALE: 1"�loco' \ P� , `s \ P ;; :: cLERK *: I `• 1 r;�C;• ', \,y� RICHA D AMBR S CITY CLERK 1h` it \��,, CITY OF DUBLIN ,:V4.,• :,,... -t„;,:',:-.:-':: Z \may Z 1 t�§�sL,' • X11 \C�' z S D •A,,,,L.F -2` \ \ la I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS APPROVED BY w3 1w \, 0.�°% 1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AT s �{ :� � REGULAR 4�11EETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE Z $s j P \\ \--,�/ ,- DAY OF Uw�usr 1983, BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. 83-38 it: , / r r+ r \ oQ REDUCED SCALE T-5000'- axy \ p'p0 n _ f c I\ M �e IVY R RICHARD AMBRO CITY CLERK p CITY OF DUBLIN �4,':k + t I \ St ry 1 COUNTY RECORDERS CERTIFICATE FILED THIS I.0 DAY OF i\wat ' ,1983,AB THE ' +t, •¢* ' i 3. HOUR OF` 2. O'CLOCK M.IN BOOK_ 0- OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AT PAGE 5� L 2 Dud%� THERE OF IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF • 141• �i _ s THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,STATE OF CALIFORNIA. gy e ' �_•� -STATE FREEWAY 4 ALA 560 .__/ ./P"g3')5I '7/o ,t, �~— '� $(o 0o F3y:M.Q•Q1«vrrwo ,�L("�`f• 1` a i RFOR THE DAVIDSON,OF ALAMEDA ORDER IN AND 1• / �\ STATE OF CALIFORNIA {C ,,,,q,,,•44,.., •-.f COUNTY AUDITORS CERTIFICATE Y.nk. - z°� \ COUNTY O HA ALAMEDA,STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUDITOR OF THE tI r • THIS...4. DAY OF_ACJG..-.._.__.1983. � ,.. NOTE, THE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS ARE INCORPORATED THE METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF THIS MAP . i {'s r+ BY REFERENCE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSORS ARE COTERMINUS WITH THE CITY LIMIT LINE AS IDiroTy IWpr 3a„ "gig ROLL IN EFFECT MARCH 1988 ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION N0.192103 OF THE rr __ 1 M r \ �n•�' ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. it DONALD M. PA KIN, u EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1;1982, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER } {?• 3, t: 4 SUBSEQUENT ANNEXATIONS. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 4:17.-di: `tt' • .r STATE OF CALIFORNIA rtsa, ,:.:.!--,,y-,:Lt-,:: ..--.J Via It4 eaWn 4$ t Y � SHEET I OF I SHEETS i`s,„e.,.„,...: