HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttach 7 Apndx8.7-Appen C APPENDIX C
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND TRIP GENERATION
UTABLE 1' APPROVED PROJECTS IN DUBLIN
of Janu~
Development Name
Land Use
Light Industrial ~'
Retail 331'
Garden Center-4.
Single Faml~idential
Duplex =
Dental Off'me '~
18-Hole Golf Course
~ily
Medium
Neighborhood Park 7~
Single Family
Research and
Auto Body Facility
Quick
' Residential ~'--
Retail ~
Arlen Ness
Arlen Ness
Armstrong Garden Center
Black Mountain
Castle ~rumark Homes)__
Chacon
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Ranch
Dublin Volkswagen ~
Emerald Glen Poinle
Galiucci
GM Auto Mall
GM Auto Mall
Greenbdar Phase 1
Greenbdar Phase 2
Palace Auto
Tassajara Meadows Phase 1
ara Meadows Phase 2
Valle .y Center
Valley Center
Waterford Apartments
Office3.
Multi-Fami~
1, 2003)
Unoccupied
Size
1
102
5.60
304.99
58.67
11.33
3,00
AM
Trip Generation - updated 8-22-03
Approved Projects
Page I
IITABLE 2: BUILDOUT PROJECTS IN DUBLIN {As of January 1, 2003)
Rates
Traffix ITE AM PM Saturday
Zone Development Name ~ Lend Use Code Size Units 'In Out In Out In Out-
14 15A Corporate Headquarters Building ~s 714 433.50 ksf 1.15 0.0___~9 0,12 1.06 0.22' 0.19
12 16A C°rporate Headquarters Building'6 714 428.5"-----~ ks'----"~ 1.1'--'--'~ 0.09 0.1'~-~ 1.-----~ 0,22 0,19
114 Anderson Light Industrial ~ 110 237.84 ks~f 0,81 0.11 0.12 0.86 0.07 0.07
115 Arm[/Residential Multi-Family Residential';----~ 22----'~-- 114~ d.u. 0.08 0,44 0.47 0,23 0.29 0,2'~
129 Ban~rPaknSave(T~hm~~ To~hou~ 23~ 11~ d.u~ 0.1~ 0.50-- 0.4~ 0.3~ 0.3~ 0.3~
129 Ban~r Pak n Save (Ap~s~ ~ Multi-Family Residential~ 22~ 13~ d.u~ 0,0~ 0.43~ O4~ 0.2~ 0.2~ 0.2~
129 Bancor Proj8909 San Ramon Townhou~ 231 55 d.u. 0.17 0.50 0,47 0.36 0.39 0.33
11~ Branaugh ~ Light Industrial ~ 110 90.26 ks~ 0,81 0.11 0,12 0.86 0.07 0.07
11~ Campbell Lightlndustdal~ 11~ 890~ ks~ 0,81-- 0.1~ 0.1~ 0.8~ 0.0~ 0,0~
5 Corse Site Dealership3 ~ ~84~ ~33'9~ ksf 1.6~ 0.6~ 1.12 1.68 1.51 1.46
117 Croak ~ Single Family Residenti~ 210 446 d.u~ 0,18 0.5~ 0.5~ 0.33 0.49 0,42'
118 DiManlo ~ Multi-FamilyResidentials 22~ 30~ d..~ O0~ 0.4~ 0.4~ 0.2~, 0.2~ 0.2~
120 DiManto Commerdal/Retail ~ Commer~al ~ 82~ 841.3~ ksf 0.4~ 0.26 1.4~ 1.5~ 2.1~ 1.9~
119 giMantoNei~ Commerdal' a2~ 7a.~ ks~ 1.0~ 0.6~ 3.2~ 3,5~ 4.94~ 4.5~
121 Do~to~ Core S,P, Commer~alTM ~ ~ ~
820 164.57 ksf Rates not appli~ble, Net new ~btained fr
121 Downtown Core SP. Offi~ w -- 71~ 357.8~ ks~ Rates not appli~ble, Nel new trips obtained
121 Do~to~ Core S.P. Multi-Family Residential w
220 100 d,u, Rates not appli~ble. Net new tdps obtained fr,
50 Dublin Ranch ~ Come'alS 82~ 163,35~ ~ 0~5'~
32/50 Dublin Ranch ~M1-M8 Single Family Residential~ ~~ ~ 0~-~
50 ~ BMH Medium'High Residential ~ ~~ ~ 0~'; t~;;
C Commerdal s 820 ~ ~ - .......
35 ' ~ ksf 0~ 0.3~ 1.921
122 ~ g Single Family Residential3 ~ ~ ~ 0~~
36~7 ~ F Multi-Family Residential 230 655 d u 0~7 037
38 ~ ~ Pu~Semi~l~~" ~ 560 20,26 ~ 0~~;;
107 Dublin Ra~nter VC) G Commercial 3,~ ~ ~ ~
40/41 ' ~~ H C°mmerdal~ 820 ~~ .............
~ ~~ ~ . , ~sf 0~ 0.3~ 1~11 ~n71 3~1
26 Dublin Ranch West (Wallis) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Single Family Residential 210 579 d u 0 19
126 Dublin Ran~ West (Wallis) Multi-Family Residential ~ 220 224 ~
126 Dublin Ran~ West (Wallis) ~ ~ ~ ~, ....
.... MuIIi.F amily Residentialzs 220 214~ ~;;
4 Dublin Transit Center ~ ~ __ __ - ....... ~.~ ~..~ u.~u u.z~ u.zb
~ ~a~en[s 220 1500 d.u. 0 08
4 Dublin Transit Center BART Paring Stmctu~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0;4,~ 0~ ~:~ 0:~ 0~
~ Dublin Transit Cente~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .........
~ ~ 714 2000 k~ I 37
Dublin Transit Ce.ter ~~~~ 1~ ~1~
114 EBJ Pa~er~ L Light Industrial 3 110i ~ ~ n~;
114 EDPO ~r ~~ 9.76 ~, ~~ ~.,~,
Single Family Residential s 210 304 ~ n ,. ....
100i Fai~ay ~' ~~~ '
' 124 ' Fallon Enterprise~, Single Family Residential ~ 633~ 0~';~;;
~'~~- ~~~ .....
114 Fallon Road Gasohne/Se~,~Stabonw/Market, 845 12i f~ ~~';;
20 GMAutoMalI8 ~- ~ ~~ ~ '
-~~. Oeaier,~[~ ' ~ 841 19.37 ks, ~;
, 125 GovemmentCenter ~. Offi~6~° 714 ~ ~ 1~'~';;
, ,18 GreenbdarPhase3 . Single~l 210 ~ ~ 0~~ "d;~ ~'~
18 ' Greenbdar Phase~ Single Family Residential6 ~~ ~ 0~';~;:
~ . ~ / Single Family Residential 210 10 d u 0 19
~ Herrera "Fre ed~" ~' Multi-Family Residential~ 22~: ~ '
~ Herrera ~rededch" ~ ~ ~ _ .... ~ ~
~ Commer~al · 814 58 81 ksf I 75
Trip Generation - updated 8-22-03
Total Trips
AM
PM
Saturday
n specific plan studies.
n s._pecific plan studies.
studies.
% Pass-By
Traffic~
Net New Trips
,AM PM Saturday Daily ~ Status
24 33 44 391 81 70 1204 -- B
19 33 44 386 80 69 1195 1195~
93 2_____~6 2__..__[~ 2.__._.~o5 17__17 83_____o~~
10 50 54 27 33 33 409 40_._._9____.L_B
1..~8 54 52 39 43 36 322 322 p
11 56 54 27 34 ~' 431 431 p
'-~-"--"~ ~ 20 21 18 161 16~
73 10, 11; 78 6 6 31'--'"-'~ 315 ~
72 1 0''-'-~ 1 1 ~ 6 6 3"-'~-~'~ 3 11 B
5_~5 2._____~0 2.._~.~2 4'1 3~8 ~3.~6 52_____~8 528 ~
80 241 264 149 219 187 2051 205~~
2~ 12~ 12~~ 7~~7~ 96~
4~ 222 794 897 1361 1221 11127 11127 B
~ 5~ 16~ 18~ 29~ 26~ 241~ 241~~
~ 6~ 24~ 221 320 296 2747~ 274~~
1~ 5~ 7~ ~ 7~ 6~ ~ ~5~ 1~ 7~ 1675' B
I~ 7~ 24~ 27~ 42~ 37~ 349~ 3~9~ B
5~ 45~ 47~ 2~6 418 356 373~ 373~ B
I~ 6~ 6~~3~ 40 40 524 524 B
)~ 12~ 41~ 47~ 72~ 650 59~ 595~ B
156 235 1149 152 129 4285 4285 B
242 236 118 164 144 1919 1919 B
2~~ o o o 0 o B
56 24 36 36 12 360 360 B
~~~~ o 0 o
44 51 28 40 34 380 380 P
5~~~~ o ~' o
'~ 37~ 15~ 23~ 37~~' 388~ 3883 B
~ 125 42~ 48~ 73~ 86~ 6052 60~ B
137 10~ 61~ 7~ 54 271~ 271( ~
4~ 5~ 28 39 33 369 369 Proje~
324 376 208 295 2~ 277~ 277~ Proje~
96 9~ 4~ 58 58 744 744 Projec~
9~ 9~ 43 56 56 710 71~ Proje~
484 473 225 293 293 3735 3735 a
11~ 22~ 502 91 213 2915 2915 B
17~ 25~ 210~ 37~ 374 6562 6562 a
o 47 73 8~ 98 1182 1182 B
I ~ ~ 1 I 34 34 P
167 1~ 1~ 1~ 129 1442 1442 B~
83 90 51~ 48 48 557 557 P
131 12~ 6~ 7~ 79 1008 1008 P
131 12~ 6~ 7~ 79~ 1008 1008 P
339 ~ 20~ 309 263 2831 2831 P
23 3~~35 4~ 49 401 401 B
12 13 2~ 22 2~ 30~ 301 B
81 11~ 906 182 15~ 3265 3265 B
63 7~ 4~ 5~ 49 552 552 P
94 108 61 85 72 822 822 B
6~~~~4 48 481 B
31~ 37 18 24 ~ 271 271 B
Pending+Buildout
Page I
IITABLE 2: BUILDOUT PROJECTS IN DUBLIN (As of January 1, 2003)
Rates Total Trips % Pass-By
Traffix ITE AM PM Saturday ' AM PM Saturday Daily Traffic2 AM
Zone Development Name Land Use Code Size ~ Units ~ -'~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ '-~ ~ ~ -.~
124 Jordan Single Family Residential ' 210 ..... 353 d.u. 0.18 0.55 0~61 ~__~i 0.34 0.50 0.42 4.69 64 192 214 120 175 149 1654 1654
127 Jordan Multi-Family Residential ' 220 658 d.u. 0.08 0~42 0.38 0,1~9 0.2___._~2 0.22. 3.10 53 277 251 124 1451 145 2039 2039
127 Jordan "First Am. Title" Commercial ~' 820 134.60 kef 0.86 0.55 2.7.____~2 2.9._..._~5 4.09 3.77 0.65 11~6 7____~4 367, 397 550~ 5'08 4126 412._~..__~6: 34 26
15 KolIDublinCorpCenterPh. 2 Office' 710 17'-'---9.8-*'~ k~ 1,46 0.20' 0.27 1.30 0.1--"--~ 0.1'---'~ 5.7---'~' 262 36 4-'---"~i 23'--'--~ 3"-'~ 2-'---~ 104'"~'~ 1041!
17 Koll Retail ~_i Commercial~ 814 60.00 ks.~_.[__f 1.75 t.62 1.11 1.48 2.1_.__~.7 2.01! 0.34 105 97 671 89 130 121 1220 1220 34 26
21 Marriott Hotel Site Retail 3,,, 814 53 kef 1.7"--~ 1.6----~ 1.1--'~ 1,4'--'--~ 2.17 2.'-'--'~ ~ ~
128 Mission Peak Multi-Family Residential ~' 0.3._~.4 9:3 8._._..~6 .~ 78 11.__...~5107 107_.____~8107.___.~8 ~ 3.__~.4. 26
128 Mission Peak Single Family Residential ~ 22{3 2_____~2d,u.___.:__ 0.0_.._~80,4;3 0,42 0,2._____0 0.2.~_.~.6 0.2.__.~6 3.32 ~2 ~ ~4 ~ 6 73 7~3 ~ __
128 Mission Peak Retail3'" ~ 210 97 d.u. 0.20 0.60 0.69 0,39 0.54 0.46 ~~5'2--'~ 19 58 67 ~38 ~52 ~~45 50'---'~ 504 ~-
814 16,99 kef 1.75 1.62 1.11 1.48 2:17 2,01 0.34 30 28 19 25 3_..__~7 34 346 346 i 34 26
128 Moiler Single Family ResidentialT 210 269 d.u. 0,18 0.55 0.62 0,35 0,5.___~0 0,43 4.79~ 49'~'~- 148 168"-'--~' 13...___.~5 11'---"~ 128'---'"~ 1288
132 Moura"Tipper" Multi-FamilyResidenlial' 22....__~0 8~2 d.u..~.._,~__ 0.09 0.4,5 0,5~2 0,25 0.32 0,3'-"~ 3.--'~81'-'-~'--'~ 42 2--'~"~' 26 26 313 313
11 Neilsen ~ Single Family Residential 3 210 1! d.u. 0.19 0,56 0,6.._~5 0,36! 0.51; 0,43 4.79 ~ 1 1 ~0 I 0 5 5
121 PD 98-049 Vacant Mobile Gas Retail3'-3'T 81'---'~-- 16,3----'---~ ks'--"--~ 1.7-"-'-~1.6'---'-~ 1,11 1~'~.4~ 2.01 0.3-'-~ 29 2~ 18 24 3'--'~ 3'-"'~ 33'----'~ 33'-----~ 34 26
124 __Pinn ISilveda Ranch) Single Family Residential~ 210 .__._.50 d.u___..~_ 0,'19 0.56 0.6,5 0,3.____~.~ 0,5...._.~1~ 0.43, 4.7._~9 ~ 2._.__~8 3~2 1.____.~82_____~6 2._._..~2 23.______~9239
11 Pinn (Silveda, Haight) Townhouse 3 230 20c- d,u.___.,c.._ 0.07 0.37 0.36 0.18 0.25 0.22 2.93 15 77 75 3_..__.~8 5...___.~2 .___46 612 61..__.__~2 ~
11_.._~4 Pleasanton Ranch Investments Light Industrial~- 11-'-'-~ 2.4'"---~ kef 0.'"~1 0.1'~'-~ 0,1"-'~ 0.8--'"~ 0.0'---'-'~ 0,0"----~ 3.4-'-~ ~ '--"~ 2 0 -~--"-'-~ 9
25 Quarry Lane School K-12 TM 521 750 pupils 0.55 0.3-~ 0.08 0,12 0,09 0.03 0.90 413 278 60 90 681 23 675 675
102 Raley "Kobold" Multi-Family Residential 3 22,_....~.0 2~0 d.u.~._:__. 0.0.._...~8 0.4:3 0.4._...~2 0.2...__~0 0.2......~6 0.2_~_6 ,- 3.32 2 9; ~ ~4 ~ ~5 66 66
128 Redgewick Single Family Residential ' 210 68 d.u. 0.21 0.63 0.71 0.40 0.57 0.48 5.35 14 43 4...__._~9L 27 39 33 3641 364
114 Righetti Light Industrial 3 11._.__.~0191.4.___.~9 ks._.~[_f _ 0.8.__.~10.1~1 0.1._~_~2o.e.___~.( 0.0._~ 0.0~7 3.49 155 21 23! 165 13 13 668! 668 1
113 Schaefer Ranch Single Family Residential ' 210 466 d.a. 0.18 0.54 0.59 033 0.49 0.42 4.58 84 ~ 2._~_~2 275! 1~5 229 195 21~36 2136
113 Schaefer Ranch ~i "etail"~-~' 814 2----~,0-"~ ks...___L_f~~~~1'7-~'~ 1,6"---'~ 1.11~ 1.4---"'~ 2.1'---~ 2,0--"~'- 9.34 46~.__~ 2'--~'~ 381 56 52 529 529 34 2'-'~
121 See's Vacant Lot Retail'37~ 81--~- 15.0--------'~ ks~f 1,75~ 1.6~2 1,11 1,4._.._~8 2.17 2,0'1_ 9.34 26' 24 17 22 3___..~3 30 305 30__._.~5~ 34 26
121 Senior Center Multi-FamilyResidentialTM 22'~'~- 5~ d.u. 0,0"~"~ 0.47 0.6'-~'~1 0,30 ....0,4-'---~0.40 4.34 ~~4 24 31 151__ 20 2"'--~'. 21"-'---~ 217
109 Shamrock Market.place Retail'~ 820 25.85 ks~f 0.63 0,40 2.97 3.2-""~ 2,5_.___~8 2,39 1.46 16 10 98 150 67 62 555 555 [ 34 26
11._.._~4 TMIChen Multi-FamilyResidential~ 22----"~ 13'---'----~ d.u. 0,0-"~ 0.4'-----~' 0.4'---~ 0,2~---~ 0.28; 0.2'--'-~ 3,51 11 58 60 30 37 37 463 463
114 TMI Chert Commercial s 820 446~49 kef 0.53 0,34 1.81 1.9.__...~6 2,691 2.4____~8 _ 9.98 238 152 809 877 1201 11091 8920 8920 34 26 2
114 TMI Chen Light Industrial' 11----'~ 219.'-"~5"~' kef 0.8----~ 0.1'-'--'~ 0,12 0,86 0.0"--'""~ 0.07 3.4"~ 17~ 2--'--"~ 2'--"--~18'~-'-~ 1'~-'"~' 1'""~'-~{ 766 766 1
129 Valley Christian Center Jr./Sr, High School, Administration3'~-3'r--'--~- 200 0.3'--"'~0.1--"-'~0.06 0.0--'--'~ 0,0"-"~ 0.03 3.90 64 28 12 18 18 6 180 180
129 Valley Christian Center ~ Senior Center, Counseling (Church) 3~z 560 30.'~'--'-~ kef__ 0,3'-'"'~0.3.___~30,3..~6 0.30 2.41 0.8___..~5_ 4.56 12 10 11 ~9 72 26 137 137
129 Valley Christian Center I Staff Expansion'~ NA 10,00 emp~ N'-~'~ NA NA N'-----~ N---'~ NA N"-'~ 1-"-'--~ ~ ~ 10 ~ ' 0 10 10
132 Vargas ~ [ Single__Family Residential3~ 210 14 d.u. 0,19 0.'"----~' 0,6'--~__ ~~~0'3-'---'~ 0.5--'~'-~' 0.4'-'-'~- 4.7'--'~ 3 8 9 5 7 6 67 67
132 Vargas Condominium ' 230 72 d.u. 0,09 0.46 0.44 0.21 0,47 0.40 3,42 7 33 31 15 34 29 246 ! 246
5 West Dublin BART S.P. Multi-Family Residential ~ ................
220 491 d.u. Rates not applicable. Net new trips obtained fn: pecific plan studies. ,
~5 West Dublin BART S.P. Commercial ~ 820 705.89 kef Rates not a.p_.pliceble. Net new trips obt._____ained fr,~ pecific plan studies. ..J __ ~ ~ 2
5 West Dublin BART S.P. Hotel ~ 310 240 rooms Rates not ap__plicable. Net new trips obtained fr(: pecif c plan studies. __ ~ ~ ~ Z
~ West Dublin BART S.P. Office~ ~ 71--"-'~- 505.5~ kef Rates not a_p_plicable. Net new trips obtained fr(3 pecific_._plan studies. ~ ~
5 West Dublin BART S.P. BART-~Z3 ~ ~ -- _ ...... 5
N_._~A 713.0._~..__~0 spaces_ ~ cpl_.._anstudies. ; 3
....
J~ Total Panding
Tetal Buildout '
~otal ~ ~ Total
Net New Trips
PM
970 1875 178~ 1134 1445 1208 13873 1387~
12714 6389 9306 15064 11314 10382 122615 12261~
13684 8264 11091 16188 12759 11571 136488
Trip Generation - updated 8-22-03
Pending+Buildout
Page 2
8~22~2003
IKEA Shopping Center Trips -
Rates Total Trips % Pass-By Net New Trips
AM 2 PM ~ Saturday 3 Daily AM 2 PM 2 Saturday 3 Daily Traffic~ AM2 PM 2 Saturday 3 Daily
Location Land Use Code Size Units In Out In Out In Out Total In Out In Out In Out Total AM PM Sa1 In Out In Out In Out Total
IKEA NA I Location 22 24 200 224 733 795 5518 22 24 200 224~ 733 795 5518 34 22 24 128 152 733 '795 551~
South of Digital Dr between Arnold High Turn-Over Restaurants 4 832 25.856 ksf 4.82 4.45 6.52 4.34 12.60 7.40 130.34 125 115 169 112 326 191 3370 43 !!!:~!~.~ __175 115 109 52 215 80 3370
Rd and Hacienda Dr Shopping Center 5 820 109.359 ksf 0.94 0.60 2.92 3.17 4.40 4.06 66.02 103 66 320 346 481 444 7220 34 26 103 66 207 233 361 324 7220
Total 250 205 689 682 1540 1430 16108
Notes: 250 205 444 437 1309 1199 16108
1 Pass-by traffic percentages obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Tdp Generation Handbook, October 1998. Shaded values are
assumed same as weekday PM peak. PM peak hour pass-by traffic assigned to IKEA represents shopping center passby characteristics.
2 AM and PM peak hour trip generation for IKEA store are based on 75% of Emeryville IKEA store per conversation with Ray Kuzbad, City of Dublin 2/27/03.
IKEA trips for Saturday are based on the average peak hour (2:30 -3:30 PM) volume for the IKEA Store in Woodbridge, Washington (see Email from Ray
Kuzbari, City of Dublin, January 3, 2003).
Trip rates based on average rate from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip Generation Handbook,
October 1998.
Trip rates based on regression equation (and not average value) from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the
Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998.
Trip Generation - updated 8-22-03
IKEA
Footnotes for Table 1 and Table 2
1 All land use sizes are based on information provided by the City or extracted from previous project reports as
directed by the City.
2 Pass-by traffic percentages obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
Handbook, October 1998. Shaded values are assumed same as weekday PM peak.
3 Trip rates are average rates from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated
in the Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998.
AM, PM, and daily trip rates are based on Final Report Transportation and Parking Impacts for the Proposed
Armstrong Garden Center, City of Dublin, June 21, 2002. Saturday trip rates are averages rates from the ITE
Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip Generation Handbook, October
1998.
AM, PM, and daily trip rates are based on Final A Traffic Study for the Proposed Trumark Homes Development in
the City ofDubfin, December 15, 1999. Saturday trip rates are average rates from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th
Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998.
Trip rates for developments based on regression equation from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to
the guiding principles stated in the Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998.
Land uses that will not generate external trips. All trips will be internal to the development.
AM, PM, and daily trip rates are based on Consultant's Report on the Transportation Impacts for the Proposed
Dublin Volkswagen Auto Dealership, City of Dublin, December 1999. Saturday tdp rates are averages rates from
the ITE T~fp Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip Generation Handbook,
October 1998.
9
AM and PM trip rates are averages rates from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding
principles stated in the Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998. Assumed PM rates are 10% of daily rates and
used ratio of weekday rate to Saturday rate and applied to PM rate to get Saturday peak hour rate.
10 AM, PM, and daily trip rates are based on Final A Traffic Study for the Proposed Emerald Glen Village Apartments
Development in the City of Dublin, March 20, 2000. Saturday tdp rates are averages rates from the ITE Trip
Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip Generation Handbook, October
1998.
11
For Specialty Retail (use 814), AM trip rates were based on the ratio of AM to PM peak hour of generator,
multiplied by the PM rate. Saturday peak rates for use 814 was based on the ratio of Saturday peak hour of
generator to Saturday for Shopping Center (use 820), multiplied by Saturday rate for use 814.
12 There is no trip Generation for Saturday from land use 845 thus, this is based on 846 which had similar AM and
PM peak hour trip generation rates.
13 AM, PM and daily trip rates were based on Draft Focused Traffic Analysis for the Proposed Dublin Village
Development, May 30, 2003. Saturday trip rates for Townhouse (use 231) were based on the ratio of Saturday
peak to PM peak for use 230, multiplied by the PM peak rate for use 231. For Apartment (use 220), average
Saturday trip rates were used.
TdD Generation - updated 8-22-03
Footnotes
Footnotes for Table 1 and Table 2
14
AM, PM and daily trip rates were based on Final Focused Traffic Analysis for the Proposed San Ramon Village
Plaza Development, June 10, 2003. Saturday tdp rates for Townhouse (use 231) were based on the ratio of
Saturday peak to PM peak for use 230, multiplied by the PM peak rate for use 231.
15 Blank
16
AM, PM, and daily trip rates are based on Focused Traffic Circulation Analysis for the Proposed Cisco Systems
Projects, City of Dublin, May 21, 2001. Saturday trip rates are average rates for General Office Building (use
710) from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip Generation
Handbook, October 1998.
17
Net new trips for AM, PM, and daily based on Consultant's Report on the Transportation Impact for the Proposed
Village Parkway, Downtown Core, and West BART Station Specific Plans, City of Dublin. Net new tdps were
adjusted proportionately in some cases to reflect current projections. Assumed 15% reduction in office trips due
to proximity to the West Dublin BART station. Also assumed 34% pass-by trips for commercial during the PM
peak. Used ratio of Saturday rates to PM rates from ITE T~p Generation and applied to PM net new trips to
determine Saturday net new trips.
18
19
20
Public/semi public area is assumed to be a church based on information provided by the City. The floor/area ratio
assumed is 0.15 based on survey of a few churches in Fremont, CA.
Only 50% of high school trips will be external trips, the rest will be internal to the development.
ITE Trip Generation for Corporate Headquarters Building (714) was used for rates because government office
building (730) only has one observation and corporate headquarters building is a single tenant office building
similar to government office building. Saturday trip rates were based on the ratio of PM average rate for corporate
headquarters building to PM average rate for general office building, multiplied by the Saturday peak rate for
general office building.
21
PM trip rate is based on Consultant's Report on the Transportation and Parking Impacts for the Proposed
Shamrock Marketplace Shopping Center Expansion, September 8, 2000. AM, Saturday, and daily trip rates
based on ITE Trip Generation 6th ed.
AM, PM, and daily trip rates are based on Final A Traffic Study for the Proposed Residential Development on
S#veria Property on Tassajara Road, City of Dublin, October 25, 2000. Saturday trip rates are average rates.
23
BART traffic based on Table 4.5-5 Dublin Trip Generation - Proposed Project from Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report for the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station and Transit Village Project,
November 2000. Saturday peak hour trips were determined from the ratio between daily weekday BART trips and
Saturday BART trips (42% obtained from BART system wide ridership data). Saturday peak hour trips were
calculated by using the same ratio as weekday PM peak hour/Daily trips (12.4%). In and out tdps were
determined by using the same split as the weekday PM peak hour (30% in and 70% out).
24
Trip generation based on Supplemental Traffic Circulation Analysis for the Proposed Commerce One Project, City
of Dublin, December 22, 2000. Saturday rate based on ITE trip generation for Corporate Headquarter (714).
Trips are not shown because IKEA project will replace this development.
Footnotes
Tnp Generation - updated 8-22-03
Footnotes for Table 1 and Table 2
25
Trip rates based on proposed trip generation provided by TJKM June 7, 2003, as part of Final Traffic Study for the
Proposed Fairway Ranch Development in the City of Dublin, April 15, 2003. Daily and Saturday peak tdp rates
are average rates from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip
Generation Handbook, October 1998.
26 Saturday and weekday trip generation rates based on High School land use (530).
27 Trip rates based on assumptions in Traffic Impact Study for Dublin Valley Christian Center Proposed Expansion,
May 2001.
28 Trip rates based on proposed trip generation provided by TJKM June 7, 2003, as part of Draft Traffic Study for the
Proposed Dublin Ranch West Development in the City of Dublin, May 5, 2003. Daily and Saturday peak trip rates
are average rates from the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, according to the guiding principles stated in the Trip
Generation Handbook, October 1998.
29
25% reduction in trips due to proximity to the East Dublin BART Station, City of Dublin Consultant's Report:
Transportation Impacts For the Proposed Dub/in Transit Center, April 27, 2001.
30
Trips for the planned BART parking structure are based on peak period counts conducted at the East Dublin
BART Station, City of Dublin Consultant's Report: Transportation Impacts For the Proposed Dublin Transit
Center, April 27, 2001. Saturday total trips were determined from the ratio between daily weekday BART trips
and Saturday BART trips (42 percent based on the BART system-wide average for fiscal year 2001). Saturday
peak hour trips were calculated by using Ihe same ratio as weekday PM peak hour/Daily trips (12.4%). In and out
trips were determined by using the same split as the weekday PM peak hour (30% in and 70% out).
31
32
15% reduction in trips to account for residential/employment interaction and increased use of transit due to
proximity to the East Dublin BART Station, City of Dublin Consultant's Report: Transportation Impacts For the
Proposed Dublin Transit Center, April 27, 2001.
Specialty retail rates obtained from City of Dublin Consultant's Report: Transportation Impacts Forthe Proposed
Dublin Transit Center, April 27, 2001.
Tnb Generation - uodated 8-22-03
Footnotes
Pleasanton and Dougherty Valley Land Use Assumptions
Buildout Traffic Estimates
'Trips
AM PM Saturday Daily
Land Use Size Units In Out In Out In Out Total
Hospital 178 beds 126 47 39 124 136! 70 2987
Medical Clinic 279 ksf 543 136 276 747 578~ 436 10096
MF Units 254 d.u. 18 94 91 46 64! 56 1488
Office 1165 ksf 1600 218 295 1441 258~ 220 12831
Light Industrial 1662 ksf 1213 266: 316 1213 116i 116 11565
Retirement Home 150 d.u. 11 201 22 12 17: 16 876
Retail 1100 ksf 691 442! 1974 2139 2842: 2842 47200
SF Units 537 d.u. 102 301 349 193 274 231 5139
Warehouse 1040 ksf 384 84i 127 403 80 45 5160
Dougherty ~ 5700 d.u. 141 415 482 267 378 319 7100
Dougherty~ 1700 d.u. 18 95 93 44 57 57 1470
Total 4178 1935 3750 5759 4085 3902 92831
Baseline Traffic Estimates
Trips
AM PM Saturday Daily
Land Use Size Units in Out In Out In Out Total
Medical Clinic 29 ksf 56 14 29 771 60 45 1048
MF Units 164 d.u. 11 61 59 30 41 36 961
Office 1162 ksf 1595 218 294 1437 257 219 12793
Retirement Home 150 d.u. 11 20 22 12 17 16 876
Retail 114 ksf 72 46 205 222 295 295 490(]
SF Units 143 ksf 27 80 93 51~ 73 61 1369
Warehouse 250 ksf 92 20 31 97 19 11 124(]
Dougherty ~ 1900 d.u. 47 138 161 89 126 106 2367
Dougherty~ 567 d.u. 61 32 31 15 19 19 490
Total 1918 629 924 2030 907 809 26042
I According to the Dougherty Valley General Plan, Specific Plan, and Related Technical Appendices, June 1992, only 13
percent of the Dougherty Valley traffic will travel through Eastern Dublin area via Tassajara Road and Dougherb/Road,
therefore only those trips are reflected in the trip generation table. Tdp rates for developments based on average rates from
the ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition.
Trip Generation - updated 8-22-03
Pleasanton-Dougherty