HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.1 DBXX NegDeclrtnResoCITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1990
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution approving
Negative Declaration for construction of two-lane access road.
REPORT PREPARED BY: ~-~,~ Dennis Carrington, Senior Planner
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Draft Resolution.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
2.
3.
Negative Declaration.
Receive the Staff Report.
Review the Draft Resolution.
Review the Negative Declaration.
4. Adopt Resolution.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
The Resolution will have no financial impacts.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council has adopted Ordinances 12-88, 7-90 and 12-90
establishing right-of-way lines for the Two Lane Access Road from
Dougherty Road to Tassajara Road. On September 1, 1990 a Notice
of Negative Declaration was published for the construction of a
Two-lane Parallel Access Road Connecting to the Hacienda
Interchange. The 21 day public review period for the Negative
Declaration ended September 22, 1990 without any comments having
been received.
The proposed resolution would approve the attached Negative
Declaration.
ITEM No. ~, / .... COPIES TO:
Agenda File
Project Planner
PA 90-033
PA 88-010
[21anendS]
RESOLUTION NO. - 90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
TWO-LANE PARALLEL ACCESS ROAD CONNECTING TO THE
HACIENDA INTERCHANGE (FILE PA 90-033)
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously established the location
of a road north of and parallel to Interstate 580 from Dougherty Road
to Tassajara Road by Ordinance Nos. 12-88, 7-90 and 12-90; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as
amended, together with the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA
Guidelines, require that certain projects be reviewed for
environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the
City of Dublin's CEQA Guidelines, a Negative Declaration for
construction of a two-lane parallel access road north of Interstate
580 from Dougherty Road east to Tassajara Road and connecting to the
Hacienda Interchange has been prepared by the Dublin Planning
Department; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said Negative Declaration was given as
legally required;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds that
the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been
prepared and processed in accordance with State and City laws and
regulations, including CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of
Dublin CEQA Guidelines, and that it is adequate and complete and that
the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of October, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
P.O Bc:< 234S D'..~qn. Cai:omia 9456S ° C,ty Offices. 100 C~vic Paza. Dubhn. Cai,forr-,a 94563
NEGATZVE QECT_,ARATION
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR:
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.)
Two Lane access road from Dougherty Road east to
LOCATION: Tassajara Road connecting to the Hacienda
Interchange and parallel to interstate 580, city
of Dublin.
DESCRIPTION: Construction of two lane parallel access road
connecting to the Hacienda Interchange and
parallel to Interstate 580 from Dougherty Road
east to Tassajara Road.
NAME OF PROJECT
PROPONENT:
FINDINGS:
INITIAL STUDY:
PREPARATION:
SIGNATURE:Laurence L. Tong, Pi~ g
city of Dublin.
The project will not have a significant
impact on the environment.
The Initial study is attached with a
brief discussion of the following environmental
components.
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plant Life & Animal Life
5) Transportat%on/Circulati°n
6) Public Services
7) Cultural Resources
This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City
of Dublin Planning Staff, (415) 833-6610.
Director
DATE: August 21, 1990
LLT/DHC: [2LANEND6]
(s15) 833-6650 · CX/ ,"-.;sc;! (-:~=, aSS 66,.35 · Finance (415) 833-6640 · Buiicrhg !nspect:cn..(415') 833-6620
~ :':~.;:,~?0 · En.?neer r-:g (,t15~ 833-6630 · Planmng (415) a~ ~n
Code Enlcrce:"'er-,t (-t!s', ~. ..... ~-
Ps-?ce (415~ $83.6,373 ° P,_~c.!c Wcr'-s (41.5i 833-6630 ° Recreat:on (415) 833 6645
Application Name:
Construction of a Two Lane Parallel Access Road
Connecting to the Hacienda Interchange
APPENDIX D -- (PART I)
INITIAL STUDY
(ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM)
(To be completed by Applicant pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines Section 1.6)
Date Filed: August 22, 1990
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: City of
Dublin, P.O. Box 2340, Dublin, CA 94568.
2. Address of Project: From Dublin Boulevard at Dougherty Road
to Tassajara Road, Parallel to and north of 1-580 and connecting from
such road to the extension of Hacienda Boulevard. Assessor's Block
and Lot Number: 946-15-1-5 (pot)
3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted
concerning this project: Dennis Carrinqton, Planninq Department,
P. O. Box 2340, Dublin, CA 94568 (415) 833-6610.
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies: State 1601 Permit, Army
Corps. of Enqineers 404 Permit.
5. Existing zoning district: Not Applicable.
6. Description of Project: (Include site area, uses, size and
number of buildings, parking, number of dwelling units, scheduling,
and any other information necessary or helpful to understand project.
This description must be complete and accurate. Exhibits or
photographs should be identified and attached). (Please attach).
7. Are the following items applicable to the project or its
effects? Discuss below all items checked (attach additional sheets as
necessary).
YES
NO
Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands,
beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of
ground contours.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
residential areas or public lands or roads.
Change in pattern, scale or character of general area
of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water
quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration
levels in the vicinity.
site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent (10%) or
more.
Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives.
Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
8. Briefly describe the project site as it exists before the
project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe
any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures.
If necessary, attach photographs of the site. The proiect site
consists of level terrain~ clayey expansible soils; is occupie~ wes~
of t__ he Southern paci~_fic right-of-wa b an auto dealershi a boat
dealershi and vacant structures and vacant land; is occupied to the
east of the Southern Pacifi__c riqht-of-way by an abandoned Nave%
~os itel and vacant lands._ The ri bt-of-wa contains no endan ered
threate__ ed o__r candidate s ecies of lents or animals. No culturalL
~istoric or sce__nic features exist on the site.
9. Briefly describe the surrounding properties, including
information on plants and animals, any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects and the type of land use.
~operties are used for various commercial uses to
the south and west.~reserve base to the north and west,.
~nd a former county Jail~ Otherwise, the vicinity i~
~haracterized by__vacant areas that have been impacted by grading~
~umpiR~_~fillin_og, and ar~rj_Q_B_lture for a considerable period of
Time. No us___es_or structures have__~_~y_cultural/historicJsceni~
values. No endanq-q~ed' threatened o~ candidate species of plant~
or animals e~ist On surrou---ndin ro erties. Surroundinq
~s consi__~ t of level terrain and clayey soils~
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above
and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required
for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
Dated:
August 22, 1990
inatur ' ~
Laurenc_____e_eL. Tong
Print Name
Planning Director
Title
Application No.:
0
Part i Submitted On ~ ~D-a~)
APPENDIX D -- (PART II)
INITIAL STUDY
(ENi~iRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM)
(To be completed pursuant to city of Dublin Environmental
Guidelines, § 1.6.)
I. BACKGROUND
Name, Address and Phone Number of Proponent:
2. Agency Requiring Checklist: ~,--Y ~ ~%[~----
Name of Proposal, if applicable:
EN~V!RON}[ENTAL iP~ACTS
II.
(Explanation of all answers
sheets if necessary-)
YESPLAYBE N_-QOsOLrRcEz
%+__3
is re~uired.
Attach additional
l. EARTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. unstable earth conditions or in changes
of geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil?
c. change in topography cr ground surface
relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic or
physical features?
e. Any increase in wind cr water erosion of
soils,either on or off the site?
~Refers to appropriate note on page.9.
Appendix D (Initial study/Part i!)
VESM~VBE ~iO soURCE
Page 2
f. changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition, or erosion which r~ay modify
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
lake?
g. Exposure of people er ~rooertv to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
2. AiR. Till the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions of
deterioration cf ambient air cuality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or ~egionatly?
d. Construction or alteration of a facility
within one-fourth of a mile of a school
which might emit hazardous air
emissions? If Yes, school district must
be consulted and must be given written
notification of the project not less
than 30 days prior to approval of E!R or
Negative Declaration (Pub. Res. code
~1151.~)-
3. WATER. will the proposal result in:
~ or the course of
a. changes in curren=s, ~s in either
direction of water movemen~
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of
surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course cr flow of
flood waters?
Appendix D (Initial study/Part i!)
yE~SM_AYBE N__qO SOO-RCE
page
d. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water cuality,
including but not limited to,
temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
e. Alteration of the direction of rate of
flow of ground waters?
f Chance in the cuantity of ground waters,
· ~ - a~dl~ions or
either through direct ~ '~
withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
g. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
h. Exposure of eeop!e or ercee-~V to water
related hazards such as f!ooczng or
tidal waves?
4. pLAi~ LIFE. will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass, crops,
and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants?
c. introduction of new species of plants in
a barrier to the normal replenishment °f'
existing seecies?
5. ~_Ni~AL LIFE. ~i!! the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of soecies, or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or
insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any univac,
rare or endangered species of animals?
Appendix D (Initial study/Part !!)
yES M_%YBE N__qO SOQIRCE
Page
c. introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a. increases in existing noise levels?
b. E}~osure of people to severe noise
levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLO-RE. will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
8. L~NI USE. will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use or an area?
9. NATUtAAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
i0. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
''~ of ~osion or the release o~
a. A r!sm an exp-
hazardous substances (including, but not'
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals
or radiation) in the event of an
accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
!!. pOPULATiON. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
Appendix D (Initial study/Part ii)
vw~,~YBE NO SOO?.CE
Page 5
12. ~OUSING. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create ~ demand for additional
housing?
13. T~A~[SPORTATION/CIRCULATiON- will the
proposal result in:
a. Generation cf substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking lac!l!~ies,
or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation and traffic systems?
p
d. Alterations to ~resent attains of
circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
air
_. =.l=__a=ions to waterborne, rail or
traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehic!~s, bicyclists or ~od~strians?
!4. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for mew or
altered gover~unental services in any of the
following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
=~ona! fac~t~es?
d. Parks or other recrea~- --- -
e. Maintenance of Dub!ic facilities,
including roads?
~ = ] services?
f. Other governm=n=a-
i5. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
Appendix D (Initial study/Part !i)
page 6
v~S ~yBE NO
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy or require
the development of new sources of
energy?
!6. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in
need for new systems or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a Power or natural gas?
b CcP~r~unications systems?
c Water?
d Sewer er septic tanks?
e Storm water drainage?
f Solid waste and disposal?
17. Hbl{A/q HEi~LT~. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
petentia! health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
!S. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic vista or view
caen to the public, or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view?
19. RECRE=!T!ON. Will the proposal result in an
impact uuen the cua!ity or quan=!=y of
existing recreational opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESO~RCES'
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of a
prehistoric or hls=orlc archeological
site?
Appendix D (Initial S=ucy/Part !!)
Page 7
v~cM~VBE NO SOU-RCE
b. Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aes=~e~ic effects to a
erehistcric, historic, er
~rchitectura!ly significant building,
structure, or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would
ai~ec unicue ethnic cultural values.
21. ~_~NDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
.... ~= ~ ] to
a. Does the eroject have uno poe
degrade the cu=~!tv ef the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat efa
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
er wildlif .... ,,~e~on to dro~ below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal co~unity,
reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of ca!ifcrnia history or
prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to
shor=-=e-m to the disadvantage
achieve ~ ~
of long-term, environmental goals? (A
~mpac= on the environment is
short-term '
one which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
to_tm impacts will endure well into the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (A eroject may impact on
two or more s~earate resources where the
impact on each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of the total
of those impacts on the environment is'
significant.)
d. does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Appendix D (Initial study/Part Ii)
yE_ _S ~,AYBE N__~O SOL!tCE
Page
22. EIR REQUIRED BY STATUTE.
a. DoeS the project involve construction of
any facility which burns municipal waste
cr refuse-derived fuel? NOTE: If the
answer is yes, then an EIR must be
~re~ared and cartifi~ under Public
Resources Code ~ 2!15!.2(a) unless
subsections (b} and (c) make that
section inapplicable-
the lead agency)
iV. D-~%TiON (To ~e ccmpl~e=d by
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X i find the proposed project COU%D NOT have a significant
.~ WiLL BE
effect on the env~_onmenn, and a NEGATIVE DECL~-OcATION
pREp.~_RED.
i find that although the propesed project could have a · ~ ~ there will not be a
~i-~nificant effect on the env!ron.~en~,
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
III1
IIII
111I
IIII
I11I
III1
1111
1111
111I
II11
IIII
Page 9
Appendi~ D (Initial study/Part !i)
described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECI~'mA~-TION WILL BE PREP.bRED.
! find the proposed project M_AY have a s!gnlf!ca~,= effect on
th----~ environment and an E}~IIRON~ENTA~ i~ACT REPORT is required.
recuires that
S~a~e s ~u~e
Y find that ....
~ ~.~m ~EPORT be ~resared and c~r~ified.
~E~VIRON~ENTAL _r.r~
C~_ -(Title)
(signature)
(Printed Name)
(Date)
(2)
(3)
(4)
· ~' based on location of project.
DefOrm!nation -
Determination based on staff office review.
~ ~' based on field review.
Determ_na~lon ~
· ~' ' based on the city of Dublin General Plan.
Determ!na~!on ·
· ~' based on the city of Dublin zoning ordinance
Deform!nation
Determination based on Specific Plan.
-Not applicable.
other (state data).
INITIAL STUDY REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO LANE ACCESS
ROAD CONNECTING TO THE HACIENDA INTERCHANGE AND PARALLEL TO
INTERSTATE 580 FROM DOUGHERTY ROAD EAST TO TASSAJARA ROAD.
Part II. Environmental Impacts - Explanation of Answers.
lb. EARTH
Compaction of the soil under the roadbed will occur during the
construction of the road. It shall be performed pursuant to
standard engineering practices and the requirements of a
geotechnical report. Any compaction will occur only under the
roadway and will not impact other soils nearby. Minor
disruptions, displacements or overcovering of the soil will occur
only under the roadway and will not impact other soils nearby.
lc. EARTH
Due to the relatively flat terrain along the right-of-way there
will be no change in topography during construction of the
roadway. Minor changes will occur to ground surface relief
features under the roadway but will not impact adjacent ground
surface relief features.
1~ EARTH
A portion of the site is located within an Alquist-Priolo Special
study Zone which has evidence of 3 traces of the Pleasanton
Fault.
Design and construction of a roadway will include a geotechnical
report which precisely locates the faults. Roadways and
utilities which cross the fault lines will be designed to
minimize damage or loss resulting from the highest magnitude
seismic occurrence anticipated for the site.
2a. AIR
This project could provide access for up to 17,000 vehicles per
day and would allow the bypassing of the Hacienda Interchange as
required by Federal and State regulations. A portion of these
vehicles would be displaced from 1-580 and would use this
facility as a frontage road to avoid congestion on 1-580. To the
extent that displaced vehicles would not be idling on the
freeway, fewer pollutants will be generated. This project of
itself would not attract significant additional traffic. The
pollutants generated by this facility will not exceed state or
national air quality standards.
3a. WATER
Minor localized changes to currents in Tassajara Creek may occur
due to the placement of the road over the creek. These currents
will be minimized by the construction of the facility pursuant to
hydraulic studies. There will be no changes in the course of
direction of water movements.
3h. WATER
This project, of itself, would not contribute substantial
additional run-off which could affect downstream flooding. A
portion of the site is located in a 100-year flood zone. Ail
drainage will be adequate to prevent downstream flooding and to
meet Federal, State and local standards.
4a. PLANT LIFE and 5a. ANIMAL LIFE
Biological surveys were conducted at Camp Parks (at the
alternative site for a Northern California Veterans Cemetery)
between August 18 and September 5, 1986. Spring plant surveys
were also conducted in 1985 by the Environmental office of the
sixth U.S. Army. These studies concluded that no endangered,
threatened or candidate species of plants or animals exist on the
site (Veterans Administration, FEIS, pp. 4-42 to 48 (SCH#
86080507)). The site supports introduced annual grasses and
pioneer weed species with California ground squirrels and
graniferous bird species. A channelized, intermittent creek
passes along Camp Parks at the eastern boundary. The creek
supports no riparian habitat. This project would have minimal
effects on the creek. Other, future development in the area
should consider rejuvenation of the creek through grading and
replanting with a small riparian plant community.
The County property is identical to the Camp Parks property
immediately adjacent to the west. Like Camp Parks, the County
property has been substantially disturbed by agricultural grading
operations, grazing, grading, dumping and use as a Naval
Hospital. It has been determined after a site analysis by staff
and review of environmental documents (Veterans Administration
FEIS, SCH# 86080507; Environmental Assessment for the Federal
Detention Center Federal Correctional Institution Pleasanton,
California (Louis Berger and Associates, Inc. September 1987);
East Dublin GPA Environmental Setting (Work Task~9, November 29,
1988), that due to habitat destruction the County property
contains no endangered, threatened or candidate species of plants
or animals. The eastern portion of the County property is
bisected by Tassajara Creek. A March 1990 field trip revealed
that in the area of the proposed road crossing, the creek
supports grasses similar to the area above the bank and is devoid
of riparian shrub and tree species. The project would not have
any adverse affect on the biotic community in either the Camp
Parks or Alameda County portion of the site.
13a. and 13c. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
The existing Level Of Service (LOS) for the Dougherty Road/Dublin
Boulevard intersection to the west of the proposed right-of-way
is LOS C. It is anticipated that by 1995 this intersection would
be operating at LOS D. Tassajara Road to the east is currently
operating at LOS A and is anticipated to be operating at LOS B or
better. The intersection of the future Hacienda Boulevard at the
two lane road extension is anticipated to operate at LOS B or
better.
A facility like the proposed two lane access road would typically
have a capacity of 17,000 vehicles per day. There are no
existing land uses adjacent to the proposed roadway that would
generate traffic to add to the demands on adjacent roadways. As
an alternate route to 1-580, the roadway could actually reduce
impacts to that highway. Future development of the surrounding
area will not occur until the completion of the East Dublin
General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan. During the Specific Plan
process, additional circulation facilities and their location
will be addressed and evaluated. No increases in traffic demands
on adjacent transportation facilities are anticipated at this
time.
Other transportation facilities which would serve/connect with
the proposed road are adequate to accommodate the roadway's
travel demands. As stated above, the capacities of the roads are
adequate and the travel on 1-580 could actually be reduced by
this roadway.
It is not anticipated that the design of the project or
conditions in the surrounding area would increase accidents due
to circulation conflicts.
14e. PUBLIC SERVICES
It is anticipated that the roadway and its intersections with
existing facilities will have normal maintenance requirements
that are well within the ability of the City of Dublin to
provide.
20a and 20b. CULTURAL RESOURCES
The project will not result in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site.
The project will not result in adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric, historic, or architecturally
significant building, structure, or object.
Field surveys undertaken during the preparation of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the Veteran's Administration
National Cemetery for Northern California found that no
prehistoric or historic cultural resources exist on the Camp
Parks property. These findings concur with those of a previous
reconnaissance conducted in 1981. An archaeological survey
prepared by Holman and Associates for the East Dublin General
Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Studies Environmental Setting
(11-29-88) indicated that there are no prehistoric or cultural
resources within the County property.
Given the general archaeological sensitivity of the surrounding
area, all construction personnel shall be advised by construction
engineers that the following procedures will be followed:
1. If any archaeological deposits are encountered during any
phase of the proposed project, land alteration work in the
general vicinity of the find would be halted and a qualified
archaeologist would be consulted. Prompt evaluations would then
be made regarding the finds, local Native American organizations
consulted and a course of action acceptable to all concerned
parties would then be adopted. In the course of making such
evaluations, the State Historic Preservation office in Sacramento
would be consulted to insure that significance assessment of
resources and proposed mitigation measures meet with Section 106
and other State and Federal requirements for managing cultural
resources.
2. In the event of encountering such deposits, construction
personnel would be instructed by construction engineers not to
handle or in any way further disturb the finds; these conditions
would be rigidly enforced, particularly in the event that
prehistoric burials are discovered.
3. Any mitigation measures necessary to preserve cultural
resources encountered during construction shall be communicated
by construction engineers to the city of Dublin in writing and
shall be entered by the City of Dublin onto a Mitigation Measures
Checklist. The City of Dublin, or any entity with whom it
contracts for construction of the road, shall be responsible for
insuring that all mitigation measures are complied with and any
entity contracting with the City shall notify the city of Dublin
in writing when those mitigation measures have been complied
with.
Should other agencies upon review of any permits necessary for
road construction determine that measures be taken to insure
protection of natural or cultural resources, those measures will
be entered onto a Mitigation Measures Checklist which would be
attached to this document. The agencies requesting the
mitigation measures would be notified by the City of Dublin in
writing that those measures have been included in the Mitigation
Measures Checklist. The agencies shall then submit a program to
the city of Dublin which outlines their monitoring program.
These agencies shall inform the City of Dublin in writing when
their mitigation measures have been complied with.
[21anend5]
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO LANE PARALLEL ACCESS ROAD CONNECTING TO THE
HACIENDA INTERCHANGE
The project consists of a forty foot wide roadway in a fifty-five
foot wide right-of-way. The roadway would run from the
intersection of Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard to Tassajara
Road, parallel to and north of Interstate 580, and connecting
from such road to the extension of Hacienda Boulevard. The site
area consists of relatively flat land which contains an
automobile dealership, a boat dealership, County storage
facilities, an abandoned County Jail facility, an abandoned Naval
Hospital, scattered sheds and corrals and vacant land. No
parking or dwelling units are proposed. The location of the
roadway is further described on the attached exhibit.
N
KF.Y:
Proposed Parallel Road A. llgnment
P;\ R,\ I,l,ILl, I/I)
ALAMEDA
COUNTY
LANDS
PIMLICO DR.
HACIENDA INTERCHANGE
PARALLEL ROAD
TRAFFIC STUDY
VICINITY
MAP
127.052 - :5'93 . CI