Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.3 MAD 86-1 Public Hearing L CITY CLERK Fife # ,3 0 - 21UI AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 3, 1999 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District No. 86-1 (Villages at Willow Creek) Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Resolution approving engineer's report, confirming diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment 2) Engineer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing 2) Receive Staff report and public comment 7zjitiV 3) Question Staff and the public 4) Close public hearing and deliberate 5) Adopt resolution approving engineer's report, confirming diagram and assessment, and ordering levy of assessment FINANCIAL STATEMENT: 1999-2000 Sources and Use of Landscape Maintenance District Funds Revenues: Total Proposed Assessments Levied: $55,195.08 Estimated Interest on Reserves: $ 4,046.00 Estimated Prior Year Collections and Penalties $ 600.00 • Less Estimated Collection Cost and Delinquency $(2,233.08) Net Total Revenues: $57,608.00 Expenditures: Contract Landscape Maintenance: $50,530.00 Utilities: $24,145.00 Administration and Engineering Reports: $ 650.00 Total Operating Expenses: $75,325.00 Amount Expenditures Exceed Revenues, To Be Funded From Reserves: $17,717.00 COPIES TO: ITEM NO. 6.1 g:\assessdist\86-1\agsthrng As shown above, $55,195.08 is proposed to be assessed to property owners for the 1999-2000 street landscaping maintenance costs. The difference between the estimated cost and assessments is made up by interest revenue on the reserve account and by use of reserve funds. The amount assessed to property owners ($84.72 per single family home and $42.36 per multi-family dwelling) is the same as the 1998-99 assessment. DESCRIPTION: This maintenance assessment district was formed in 1986 as part of the review and approval of the Villages at Willow Creek development. This assessment district funds the maintenance of landscaping, including fencing and soundwalls, along the west side of Dougherty Road from Amador Valley Boulevard to the northerly City Limit, along Amador Valley Boulevard from Dougherty Road to Wildwood Road, along Wildwood Road and Fall Creek Road, and certain landscaped areas within the Ridgecreek single-family home development. Landscaping within the condominium and apartment developments is the responsibility of the property owner or homeowners' association for those individual developments. The landscaping along and within the Alamo Creek channel area is not included in the assessment district as it is the responsibility of Alameda County Flood Control, Zone 7. For Fiscal Year 1999-2000, Staff is not proposing a change with respect to the method of determining the , assessments. The District boundary remains the same as last year. The assessment to the property owners is proposed to be $84.72 per single-family home and $42.36 per multi-family dwelling unit. This is the same as the past three years' assessments, and Staff proposes to utilize$17,717.00 of the accumulated reserve in this District in order to maintain the assessment at the same level. Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the resolution. T I9 • RESOLUTION NO. -99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 (VILLAGES AT WILLOW CREEK) WHEREAS,by its Resolution No. 28-99, a Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for City of Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 86-1 (the"District"),this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer of Work and ordered said Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said report was made and filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by this Council and found to be sufficient in every particular,whereupon it was determined that said report should stand as Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforesaid Resolution and that August 3, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers,Dublin Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza,Dublin, California,was appointed as the time and place for a hearing by the Council on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment,notice of which hearing was mailed, published and posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.6; and WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place, said hearings were held, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard,and all matters pertaining to said levy were heard and considered by this Council, and this Council thereby acquired jurisdiction to order said levy and confirmation of diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the report of said engineer to pay the cost and expenses thereof; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve that: (a) The property owners owning more than fifty percent of the area of assessable land within the District had not, at the conclusion of said hearing,filed written protests against the said proposed levy, or against the Engineer's Estimate of costs and expenses, or against the maps and description, or against the diagram or the assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof; (b) The public interest, convenience, and necessity require that said levy be made; (c) The District benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof,are as shown by a map thereof filed in the office of the City Clerk,which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3`d day of August, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ��-:1'1-4 �r= `�" te::.,, a - CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1986-1 ('TRACT 5511) • 6S• oF Duz, // 19ie — 82 4LIFoO\' FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTENTS 1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs, Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning. 2. Assessment Diagram A[ C :tk rv:4f h 4i.. ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District 1986-1 for the maintenance of improvements more particularly therein described; and WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq., of said Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to be paid by said District. ESTIMATE OF COSTS (1) (2) (3) As Preliminarily As Finally As Filed Approved Approved Cost of Maintenance $ 74,775.00 $ 74,775.00 Incidental Expenses $ 62,630.08 $ 62,630.08 TOTAL COST $137,405.08 $137,405.08 Estimated 1999-2000 Interest Income Applied to 1999-2000 Operating Costs $ 4,046.00 $ 4,046.00 Prior Year Collections &Penalties $ 600.00 $ 600.00 Estimated Surplus from 1998-99 Fiscal Year $ 77,564.00 $ 77,564.00 NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 $55,195.08 $55,195.08 As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also the Iines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate number upon said diagram. I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. 2 Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within said landscaping _ maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 and includes all of such parcels excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or rights of way to be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word "unknown" opposite the number of each lot of parcel of land assessed, the amount assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment. Dated: July 1, 1999 AAA— City EngineeJ 3 SCOPE OF WORK The following areas are to be maintained by this Maintenance Assessment District: 1) The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of the street for the entire length of Willow Creek Drive. 2) Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 16, 37, 38, and south of Lot 145, all within Tract 5511. 3) Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard between Dougherty Road and Wildwood Road. 4) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of Wildwood Road. 5) Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvements along the west side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard adjacent to Lot 150. 6). Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west and north sides of Fall Creek Road. 7) Roadside landscaping and emergency access surfacing at the north end of Crossridge Road within the street right-of-way. • • 4 o ' ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 1999- 2000 is as follows: Maintenance (1) Weeding, fertilizing, pruning, plant replacement, irrigation system: $50,530.00 (2) Utilities: $24,145.00 (3) Administration $ 100.00 $74,775.00 Incidentals (1) Engineer's Report and Proceedings $ 550.00 (2) Cost of Collection (County of Alameda) $ 938.00 (3) Delinquencies $ 1,295.08 (4) Contingencies/Reserve • $59,847.00 $62,630.08 TOTAL: $137,405.08 • 5 ASSESSMENT ROLL Amount of Assessment for Assessment and Lot Number Property Owners Lots/Units 1999-2000 Tax Year Per Unit Total Lots 1 - 145 (Village VI) Unknown 145 lots $84.72 $12,284.40 Lot 150 (Village I) Unknown 56 units $42.36 $2,372.16 Lot 151 (Commercial Corner) Unknown . 4 units . $84.72 - $338.88 Lot 149 (Village II) Unknown 248 units $42.36 $10,505.28 Lot 148 (Village III) Unknown . 224 units $42.36 $9,488.64 Lot 146A(Village IV) Unknown 135 units - $42.36 $5,718.60 Lot 146B (Village V) Unknown . 204 units $42.36 • $8,641.44 Lots 152-177 (Village VII) Unknown 138 units $42.36 $5,845.68 $55,195.08 6 METHOD OF APPORTIONING Each single family lot shall be assigned a benefit unit of one (1), each multifamily unit assigned a benefit unit of one-half(1/2), the commercial lot shall have a benefit unit of four(4), and the open space lots shall have a benefit unit of zero. This gives the following benefit units and apportionments for each Village for this Fiscal Year: • Number of Benefit % of Total Living Units Units Assessment Lot 150 Village I . 56 28 4.30 Lot 149 Village II 248 124 19.03 Lot 148 Village III 224 112 17.19 Lot 146A Village IV 135 67.5 10.36 Lot 146B Village V 204 102 15.66 Lot 1-145 Village VI 145 145 22.26 Lots 152-177 Village VII 138 69 10.59 Lot 151 Commercial 0 4 0.61 Lots A-D Open Space 0 0 0.00 Total: 1,150 651.5 100.00 7 CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 CERTIFICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Column(1), with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on July 6, 1999. Ckj,i( CIL I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 123-99 duly adopted by said Council on J y 6, 1999. In/ ei I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify th. the foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. ***-99, duly adopted by said Council on August 3, 1999. • I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a certified copy of the Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on , 1999. 8 • • tilt lilt ,MIN[ 0197/A4 QA7t 01LT1 MOIWI MC TA 15.01 AM 100,0 IA 41N CHIP /NNW /� N 97.14.14.11 91.14 M•00'M' N.N 14.14 7.00 51.71 N M'11•N'( 1i11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM N 17'M•14'1 119.18 MINN• ' • 114.00 •1.79 179.71 141,11 N 79'11441'1 N N•M•N'N N.N M'N'N• 141.00 M.M 17.00 MI,M II 71'11'14'[ L 1rrfA7�A N 14'14.7'1 91.11 7•49'99' 11.00 79.04 47.18 79.71 N 1E14.7'[ .. ^A_f�' Aft . N 14'91.00'1 191.00 9'11'99• 171.00 7.14 17.81 7.14 N 11'14'17'1 J Street Lighting Maintenance N 00'7'99'1 18,91 11'01'11' 117.00 438.11 119.71 17.7 N 00.11•44'[ • IrE A �t N M'M'M•1 IN.N M'7'M' 111.00 119.81 IN.M 111.11 N 71'll'7't .�; Assessment District 86-i N 7.1['00'[ 7.11 I • N M'19'M•t 114.00 I V 1 N 19'97.7'1 Iw,99 It1 ✓ 1 N 7'18'14'[ 919,14 1 1 N w•M•7.1 91,11 CITY OF DUBLIN 1 /1111•41.141.11 7.00 I /1 '• 1!' 1 N 19'14.00'1 [19.17 1 N 14'7'7'1 ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA l'/D/.V/Ty MAP 1 N M'M'M'1 001'11 I XS. FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 I N M'7'17't 99.14 WALE IN/!fT I N 7•7.94'1 99,00 ' ■CALlI 1'■•00' CAMP PARKS AOAO /OVON 41+rr0+gaw+rr pOUGNEff2 �,. 4.. 491 a•ti tyv.A, lam; roar9rr•7rE o _ 1r' 1 " N „1 1 ,.- t LOT .C. ! �� INN'�1t.AetM14r IILY"YII1/1 - - I W OT •F'Is 8 DISTRICT 4f 7A. � _ N d Eerr 00A0 1 R .1 -_ pOUGN G O �\ - _ �JllllY:'YIGI[' - _. 14A•M IAN 7 d L•679 WIOENIN I I j :4'04 N 0 Arm E Al.1t ,`-1 '1t I .7C 1 1 OCIIONERTT ROAD I W I Lt 11 d B W/OENiAY,SEE DETAIL C R ;a SHEET]OF J ,G SEE DE AIL D 149 A 1 1468 a0,0 E'.I 3 cur 'B ` 1 1 1 9 \ .`\ SHEET : OF S SO 1 01, \ \EASEMENT _ „ t,44 G. ,.-.. iiii t e /t Uq/4 C ` ` .p ui. _ LOT 'E' �©,' a 'QFE,�-'pi/tCLE 1;';�` 1 SEE DETAIL B .. '!j • ¢•' �4 �� O©�®��� `.. SHEET 2 OF J `�� z. ©���0 Y ®' SEE DETAIL A r u � �NAO S 3 ��©glallt n SHEET 2 OF J .`\\j` - / �� .', �b ®®�� ®' x`21pCIR -_` _ --,_-. o s�� � � LOT_. •u ;,�sR��0�4©SAO®�®fie©O�A���®880�� -=�. ®�� iiiii 4719 • ��� ®r ■® �A� 1�. r153 !RACE s a ■��1 1 ',�I,, l0 (42,�.N 41 NOTES: HE ME7E5 AND 30UND DESCRIPTION ®1/� W4T2R A SERVAT FLOOD RIC rqO(. •2 d'' THIS METES IC7 ARE THE SAME AS TN ..,L L 11 11� � WATER CON_SERVAT/ON O/STq/CT SHOWN FOR TRACT 351: EXCEPT ������ PA4ti'EL�C SERIES NO 8e-076934 PARCEL 146 IS EXCU:DED AND RESER FOR A FCTURE DISTRICT ANNEXATI DISTRICT BOUNDARY • TILE INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE sH • oN TRACT:AP SS11,-TRACT MAP 570 JUNE, 1960 REVISION: ASSESSMi DISTRICT LOT 147 DIVIDED INTO L 152 THROUGH 177 AND LOTS I THRO tor 153 TRACr 4719--142 N 41 W. LOT 140 DIVIDED LYTO LOTS 1 AND LOT 1408. JUNE, 1999 REVISION: ASSESSNI SAS 11 KM27N0 DISTRICT LOTS 146A AND 1460 WI JUNE, 1991 REVISION: ASSESSMENT ANNEXED INTO THE DISTRICT. I 7It L1M 7T1m1 7K 701A wen 1194KN79 DISTRICT LOT 1465, DIVIDED INTO 20 149• AND LOTS 192-177,11 LOTS 1 row+MANfr/c01Tr+cOJrA LOTS (19 BUILDING MID 1 COMMON WERE SUBDIVIDED INTO COMDOMINII 4WIrI►N114111N7 !r•1 SLOW TN I1Nr14rf LI1t OF DaUl tN77 AM. AREA). ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOTS 16 AS SHOWN OH SHEET 2, DETAILS B.1 AND 17 ON DETAIL A, SHEET 2 DIVIDED A RESPECTIVELY. LOT'S 17-79 1 741[141 y 1t91'19'M'L PM P.N.147! INTO LOTS 194-200 LOTS 201-205 LOTS B,C,E,7 AND C WERE ADJUST NOR IM RESPECTIVELY FOR LOT LINES, Nr9, FA 17. •',MEET I C �� 00211211, • • ® ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM •Street Lighting Maintenance • Assessment District 86-1 CITY OF DUBLIN ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2701 FISCAL YEAR - 1999-2000 G O1111 a'1.∎_7-= 2782 e r r• &eo • 1©� A "r„W scm'O 0� 0� _ i/ I 0 • �. CO , G®4 Oa ©3-w.fr r ii *3 • �• O °w r®'4 000 ,4(D • T m% e(pQ( ®0m,� 0.0 7J a��: I t ,0, ,y O Om 1e 40,,,,•0 V,,V, B ar 00,4. °•. 1 r HI i 4 0.0 t 4'. efp 'O 00 N 0y v•C . CP r pQ g rP. ' . ( .„oi ° µ ® 1 ©© f ` • i 1• � C, � • ©©i �0® A .0•161 4� R _w1LO �O • 0t� * -_ a a m I y . � ® ® 4 °B m \ well . ....-.. yt +•1,a• lC � 4' �� r� 2782 ` � ' `~ D •2 • \f � E , W"„ �Y I. ' b ��© .10 g�m °ee 4'® `'494,d c n.'c ' © my „ 51”.°S d'0 °© ° 'Veld!)c pip ,� Q f 1 Er) ryJ0 .° 0.0®RO ® eC ,1 Y , !D2'IQ�'•yr- CIPC '',/ 421 c Ot®�f©,,^4r °rTi. • `.••\ •ti .Q�^,:•�II cd N• L.` l,,0.0 rl X10 3e•k. 1 \ r7 n;r II �F' DETAIL C ' Gar ;S ` ®t $ 2791 y e0 " Q • :"_ •7 ii Q n y ®1 t ® ra z P �c n i D • ETAIL D • WILLOW CREEK O0. - -27&-------) SHt6T 3 OF] C07341 a • A an an N j r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A 7.4.-- Street Lighting Maintenance " J " Assessment District 86-1 C%'""?; CRCCK j rrr7+�� SIIADY ' r " 1 �-T7�- c '-nl:l ��� . a ra rirr `1. ••, „ n i. a�I II I. nck/34.�IR CITY OF DUBLIN • ',.° •... " ALAMEOA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA •1 Eli ;il .. • "„",6q.Ike t• FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 3p . t°'-' a i m 6-;,:,---(5-50,„',..-�.,r1'' 'j . r �Q)I ,✓' , .�. ,��, ,MI rn ei•■Ir tI f ' SCALE: 9'- 200' . .. 1 p CD. C) e e, N x!9 o e. Syr ..ter. • r: •F, e �e !J a• 7,1.;(,{. i�+;•r 4514:34:`�; .I. fig. °;j t Ia y Y 110771 w^r ! ,il gy. NC�r %�' r* ° C "- A e t� o^N t ■ c e ,,' cecl,Jit.. • 67•, F a 21 rcE)�T 44,,,‘:""`r r)e(4 8t7C°i��le°/�e t t. :, z. .. ..,, 0 I'% (9,�\ g. P ,,7 Ig' ti+a,rd , "rte "r �%�.)}�C�•> ^ y C•I fe `J l A t.,r is J°e rJ� ja / tJn. CJ r N�, ■� 'C■�r C I •�',,,c. n •.'4- 4,3›: ... yg °��' cdie o l,, . g K' '0E4'F.rl ° e / a , s >p., `c�" is "� / r v ! ?� E� c(l J° 'H�S .. e l�i t CJT t �`n ' .... �'�r45?-1(;;S:71 ^•,,,,•C t•/ ����� C^'N�"i O /�??, N t ,lf,, ,„ .,,�i16,,..0 ')•5 DETAIL A NOT661• ^^4r. w..'�l�a... :r •�f f ( r• \° • • THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT NUMBERS ARE r•r•74•rr/ • l�� (l fl c C °fl tl' 7•,• COI[PON ED OF: •) A LOT NUMBER FOLLOWED NY A , /'r i■ 3�f�� ra Cry�e O ���' �S+,L•If HYPE=AND EAal INDIVIDUAL UNIT NIMOcl1 OR b) „ ' r,r(r� ,':••r r`')�� X10' ice' r . +i A LOT RUNNER FOLLOWED BY A HYPHEN AND THE o 1 rr_7JC'�CJ/( /.I rcar r7 ti',�" C,�C{ .+r J, cf�1,r�f ' LITERS •CDI•I• FOR NUIIDINO COMMON AREASI OR , T /, �u(��Ca ^a r`\`,�e • „a a•�.7� '' cCf,>`�■ f- �� a) A LETTER FOLLOWED NY A HYPHEN AND THE C ' ! ^'f■�J lJl 51 1- ,,-' LITTERA •CORN• FOR GENERAL COMMON AREAS. ,a• t) (; .1,,,, ■/:letC a e(.!Cdr W o E,j° •C��c ° Ylrr�l� 7 c c cJ�/J' DETAIL N NOTES: 1 a /]• ■w...r, o ij1;;?�t7. • //Cl�•��\l%11 ° r, \,r• •THE SSSSSSNINT DISTRICT LOT RUNNER! ARE °•\ ,.@8'•e r. 'a;•,, ''"' �%QCl l� ■..,J, CONPOUID OF1 •) A FOUR DLOIT BUILDING NUMBER JJ FOLLOWED BY EACLI INDIVIDUAL UNIT LETTER: OR •••*"O' � ',�° _.1 ',r,., r b) AN AREA LETTER FOLLOWED NY A HYPHEN SAND lr�\ 1 �(�r"• - •- THE LETTERS •COMB• FOR THE COMMON AREAS. •, e�'c$ ,,8 ° "')C(l�'Ji• t.0CV0,•y �J C ,.. :el( , • EXAMPLES: Eq. : ® t." `Li LOT L m AREA DISTRICT E it 41i H ASSESSMENT •.,C'��° . V'` • DETAIL A WE ► c DISTRICT `� ��� �' �4rg:-- ENE 69 70 71 71 NUMBER �14 107 10E lOf 110 111 ° C. LOT O'• "' r r.,r, i 71-00I0I BLDG 6570 NUMBER pp , I. `-21-111. 1p 0 _E-c0101 N -\6rLOC ' DETAIL B . COID6 a AREA N-Conn SHEET 2 OF : • CrJ7aw