HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6.1 Traffic Control Amador Valley Blvd. i'
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 14 , 1983
SUBJECT Written Communication from Terry Cully, 7029 Amador
Valley Boulevard re : Traffic Control on Amador Valley
Boulevard
EXHIBITS ATTACHED Letter from Terry Cully dated November 9 , 1983 ;
Petition
RECOMMENDATION 1 ) Hear concerns of Amador Valley Boulevard residents
2 ) Direct Traffic Engineer to include those concerns
in the Amador Valley Boulevard traffic study
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None
DESCRIPTION The City has received a letter from Terry Cully, 7029
Amador Valley Boulevard and a copy of a petition requesting the City
Council to consider the following traffic control and street improvements
for Amador Valley Boulevard:
1 ) Install stop signs at the intersections of Ann Arbor Way/Amador Valley
Boulevard, Penn Drive/Amador Valley Boulevard, Brighton Drive/Amador
Valley Boulevard.
2 ) Landscape the median dividers on Amador Valley Boulevard.
3 ) Maintain the existing speed limit of 25 mph and utilize radar to
enforce the speed limit.
Mr . Cully has indicated that the residents on Amador Valley Boulevard do
not want the street widened, nor the speed limit increased to 30 mph.
During the 1983-84 budget hearings, the City Council authorized the Staff
to undertake a comprehensive traffic engineering study of Amador Valley
Boulevard. The Traffic Engineer has indicated that it will be
approximately two months before the comprehensive traffic study is
completed. In addition, during the 1983 through 1988 Capital Improvement
Program review, the City Council considered the improvement of Amador
Valley Boulevard by narrowing the median in order to provide safer access
out into the traffic lanes by residents . This project, along with
subsequent landscaping, were scheduled for 1984-85 and 1985-86 , pending
the completion of the comprehensive traffic study by the City ' s Traffic
Engineer.
Staff shares the concerns that the residents have with respect to traffic
safety along Amador Valley Boulevard and will incorporate those concerns
into the review of the Amador Valley Boulevard traffic study.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO: Terry Cully, 7029 Amador Valley Blvd
ITEM NO' 6 . / Joseph Martin, 7017 " 11 it
os c
c%o c rTy o�`��3�/szJ
1,F°-3
UAtiT
F O�e 414 T�oi-) C 0A) TA/y D /mil 7-7,4 CrP > cof y
O /e-
%/-de- 012
'4 -002
�H�•�'.c you/
Ccy'ccCy
-7 p ,CJ
-D C,(a C W f--• 9'cl,-r� �
c�� 6> 3�
NClV
r:3TT Oi: .� .a�;
• PLiITION IN SUPPORT OF
AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR AMADOR VALLEY BLVD.
We the undersigned are concerned citizens of the City of Dublin,
Alameda County, State of California .
We are herreby petitioning the Dublin City .Council and Alameda
Board of Supervisors to cancel their "Master Plan" for Traffic
Control on Amador Valley Boulevard and instead consider the following
plan which emphasizes safety, traffic speed control , and neighborhood
improvements .
The plan simply stated includes three basic points which we the
undersigned subscribe to :
1) The placement of Stop Signs where Ann Arbor Way and Penn. Street
intersect with Amador Valley Boulevard in an effort to provide
safety to both vehicles and pedestrians (school children for
example) traveling in both directions .
2) The landscaping of the medium divide of Amador Valley Boulevard
in an effort to improve the neighborhood scenic value . This would
also include a continual maintenance of the divide strip to keep it
clean of trash.
3) The posting of a speed limit of 25 miles per hour along the entire
Amador Valley Boulevard with appropriate radar enforcement by the
Dublin Police Department . Although the speed limit is now 25 miles
per hour along most sections of the boulevard, this speed limit
would be enforced with the aid of radar surveillance so as to catch
speeding vehicles that now average 40 miles per hour .
In addition, we the undersigned do not want :
1) A widening of Amador Valley Boulevard as proposed by the City
to accomodate more traffic .
2) An increase of the speed limit to 30 miles per hour , or higher .
3) A costly increase to the taxpayer as proposed by the City' s
"Master Plan" on Amador Valley traffic which has been estimated
to run as high as $400 , 000 to achieve fruitless objectives .
This petition was circulated by :
Joseph Martin 7017 Amador Valley Blvd. 833-8084
Name Address Phone Number Date
Terry Culley 7029 Amador Valley Blvd. 828-0232
Date
1 . Name Address
Print
Signature Phone Date
2. £S'i31 -1' ice✓ Tyc ��c�iTc.� o��� /i� •, .�, ors'
3, c,e �ti ,�JJ, T .ice s; si �. R E C E ! V E
NOV 1983
UTiY CA- P?4� 1Y'1,1