HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.1 Vector Control Services . 5k 5o
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 12, 1983
SUBJECT Proposed County Service Area and Benefit Assessment
for Vector Control Services
EXHIBITS ATTACHED Letter from Director, Division of Environmental Health
dated October 31, 1983 ; Executive Summary; Proposed
Plan for Establishment of a Countywide County Service
Area and Benefit Assessment for Vector Control
RECOMMENDATION Receive presentation
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Estimated cost per household per year - $3 . 10
Not to exceed - $4 . 00 per unit
DESCRIPTION The County of Alameda Division of Environmental Health
has the responsibility to provide vector control services throughout the
County. Vector is defined as an animal or insect which is capable of
transmitting disease or causing injury or annoyance to humans . Typical
vector problems which are handled by the Division of Environmental Health
include rats and mice, cockroaches , flys, fleas, bees and wasps, spiders and
other animals as well as refuse and animal waste . The Division of
Environmental Health is also involved to a limited extent in rabies control
activities .
As a result of the County ' s fiscal problems , the vector control services
which have been provided by the Division of Environmental Health have been
reduced by 65% since 1978 . Since the services that are performed in this
area by the County are so critical to the health and welfare of residents
residing throughout the County, the Division of Environmental Health has
proposed the establishment of a County Service Area and Benefit Assessment
for vector control services . According to the County, such a County Service
Area would enable the County to restore its vector control program to a
comprehensive level of service to all cities and the unincorporated area of
Alameda County. It would also provide a mechanism for stable and adequate
funding for a critical and basic service in the future . The benefit
assessment would operate very similarly to the paramedic service benefit
assessment which was established earlier by the County. The benefit
assessment proposed by the County is estimated at $3 . 10 per benefit
assessment unit with a $4 . 00 per year cap .
A description of the Dublin program which is presently being performed in
the City along with a proposed program for the City of Dublin is included in
the attached executive summary and proposed plan.
As indicated in the executive summary, the code provides that the Board of
Supervisors can create a County Service Area for such a service . Cities may
be included in the County Service Area by a majority vote of each City
Council . This program has been presented to the Alameda County Manager ' s
group. It was the consensus of the Manager ' s group that subsequent to a
majority vote of the individual City Councils, the County hold a binding
confirmation election in order to confirm the willingness of the residents
within the County to be included in such a County Service Area. This
election would be held in July 1984 .
This program will be formally presented to the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting of December 13 , 1983 . Subsequent to that meeting, it is anticipated
that the Board of Supervisors will send a resolution to each of the Cities
within the County and request each of the City Councils within the County to
consider adoption of that resolution to be included in the proposed County
Service Area.
Staff has arranged with a representative of the Alameda County Division of
Environmental Health to make a presentation to the City Council with respect
to the services performed under vector control by the Division of
Environmental Health and also to discuss the concept of the County Service
Area funding that program.
-------------------------.------------.--------------------------------------
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO. 8'
11 c � 1VED
ALAMEDA COUNTY 1\10V 0 1 "!,)
HEALTH CARE SERVICES 40
CARL N. LESTER 4►_ Eai Y CF "�'3Lf°1
AGENCY
gency Director
470-27th Street,Third Floor
Oakland,California 94612
(415) 874-5116
October 31 , 1983
.Mr. Richard C. Ambrose, -
City Manager
City of Dublin
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
.Dear Mr. Ambrose:
SUBJECT: PROPOSED COUNTY SERVICE AREA AND
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FOR VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES
At the City Managers ' Association meeting on Wednesday, October 19, 1983, it
was agreed that we would provide an Executive Summary of the overall proposal
and specific information relevant to your jurisdiction. That summary is
enclosed.
Two other issues were discussed that needed further clarification. One- was
related to administrative costs and the other to supervisory personnel .
1. Administrative Costs
Indirect costs of the program is 12% of the total budget.
All other costs are direct program costs.
2. Define Supervisory Personnel
Supervisory personnel are the field supervisors responsible .
for direct supervision of field activities.
.Mr. Richard C. Ambrose -Z- October 31 , 1983
We look forward to your continued support and anticipate working.with you
and your Council to implement the proposal .
Very truly yours,
DAVID J. KEARS, DIRECTOR
MENTAL HEALTH & COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
e
Division of Environmental Health
GHW:cb
Enclosure
cc: David J. Kears (.no encl . )
Judy Shukraft (no encl . )
Carl L. Smith, M.D. (no encl . )
PROPOSAL FOR A COUNTY SERVICE AREA AND
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FOR VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DUBLIN
I . BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
Traditionally, health agencies have enforced local ordinances to
control rats, mice, insects, garbage, and other health nuisances
relating to public health vectors. Funding for this necessary _
service was not a problem until passage of Proposition 13. As a
result of reduction in available funds, the ability of the
Division of Environmental Health to provide vector control ser-
vices has been reduced by 650. This program consists of non-
mandated activities which must compete for the shrinking health
dollars .
Creation of the Proposed County Service Area and Benefit
Assessment will accomplish a two-fold purpose as follows:
A. Enable the County to restore its Vector Control Program to a
comprehensive level of service to 14 municipalities and the
Unincorporated Area of Alameda County.
B. Provide a mechanism for stable and adequate funding through
formation of a County-wide County Service Area to be
financed by a benefit assessment. The benefit assessment is
estimated at $3.10 per benefit assessment unit with a $4.00
cap.
II . STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
Definitions: The word "vector" is a biological term meaning an
animal or insect, spider , tick or mite which is capable of
transmitting disease, or causing injury or annoyance to man.
Vector control involves taking measures against these vectors to
interrupt the transmission of vector-borne diseases or otherwise
prevent injury and annoyance.
There are over 35 known diseases and injuries caused by vectors
in California. The most prevalent vector-borne disease in Ala-
meda County is rabies, which occurs yearly in wildlife, mainly
in skunks and bats. Constant surveillance must be maintained to
prevent this disease from spreading to humans and domestic
animals. Bubonic plague has been found in the ground squirrel
and coyote populations as recently as 1981. The three most
common reported vector and related problems in the county in
order of occurrence are: (1) rodents, (2) animal bites, and (3)
garbage and rubbish.
III . PRESENT VECTOR CONTROL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES IN DUBLIN:
Program activities are done primarily in response to Requests
for Services. Field Staff conduct investigations, public educa-
tion, and enforcement. Vector problems which are investigated
include rats and mice, cockroaches , flies, fleas , bees and
wasps, spiders, and other animals, as well as refuse and animal
wastes. Rabies control activities vary according to the extent
of activities done by the local animal control services. -
In Dublin, the Division of Environmental Health approves quaran-
tine procedures, quarantines and releases biting animals, pro-
vides forms for reporting animal bites, evaluates and maintains
statistical data, processes animal heads for submission to the
laboratory, and notifies bite victims regarding the health sta-
tus of biting animals.
In 1981 through 1983, problems have been reported at the rate of
4.6/1,000 population. The median in Alameda County is 5.6. Rat
and mice complaints are up 34% since incorporation. There were
an estimated 131 total man hours spent in vector control in
Dublin in 1982.
IV. THE PROPOSED EXTENDED PROGRAM ACTIVITIES IN DUBLIN ARE AS
FOLLOWS :
1. Neighborhood surveys for rat infestations .
2. Collection of rodents for laboratory examination for plague
and for flea counts.
3. Total man hours added to Dublin is 462 to bring the total
projected program hours to 593.
V. FISCAL ANALYSIS AND BUDGET:
This proposal will balance the necessary activities to be
conducted in each municipality with the available revenue from
each city. The estimated benefit assessment at $3.10 provides
$15,441 from the estimated 4,981 Benefit Assessment Units from
Dublin .
The estimated total costs for the program in Dublin is $16,248
based on $27.40 per man hour. The total budget for the County-
wide program is as follows:
2
Personnel Services $ 816 , 627
Equipment 55, 000
Supplies and Services 177 , 000
Total Direct Costs: 1,048,627
Indirect Costs (120) $ 125, 835
Subtotal : $1, 174 , 462
Contingency Fund (10%) $ 117, 446
Grand Total : $1, 291,908
VI . LEGAL AUTHORITY:
The County Service Area Law, Section 25210. 1 et. seq. of the
Government Code enables the Board of Supervisors to create a
County Service Area for miscellaneous extended services. One of
these services is vector control.
Cities may be included in the County Service Area by majority
vote of each city council using one of three processes:
1. A majority vote of council members only.
2. A majority vote preceded by a public advisory election.
3. A majority vote to be followed by a binding confirmation
election.
3
3
iq9
i
i
4 -
PROPOSED PLAN FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A COUNTYWIDE
COUNTY SERVICE AREA AND BENEFIT
ASSESSMENT FOR VECTOR CONTROL
C
[F&6�
31.
L
L
ISO; MEMMMMIMEMIMA
1 . .
PROPOSED VECTOR CONTROL PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF DUBLIN
s
LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR VECTOR CONTROL AC _
TIVITIES -
A. Contract between the- Cit of'Dublin' and Alameda Count Health Ca
Services A enc v re
No contract currently exists between the two entities to provide for
services of the Alameda County Health Officer or his designees.
B. City Ordinances relating to Vector Control
The City of Dublin has adopted County ordinances by reference in the
interim, until the final adoption of municipal codes. The listing
that follows is an analysis of County ordinances.
1 . General Enforcement: Codes enabling the County Health Officer
to enforce and abate local and state codes are:
i
Title 3 , Chapter 4, Article 9, which gives the County
Health* Officer or the Director of Environmental Health
abatement responsibility for every dangerous and insanitary
condition in the unincorporated territory in Alameda County.
Title 7 , Chapter 7 , Article 1 , which gives the County
Health Officer enforcement authority over matters pertain-
ing to public health.
Title 1 , Chapter 4, Article 11 , which provides for the
recovery of .costs incurred by* the County Health Officer
resulting from the enforcement of "statutes, orders.
quarantine, rules , or regulations. "
2• Rodents: Several ordinances give responsibility to the County
i
Health Officer to investigate or abate rodent problems:
Section 3-69.9 (IIIa) which prescribes weekly rat inspections
i and abatement for hog farms.
1
Section 3-70.3 (lb) which prescribes weekly rat inspections
and abatement for animal feeding yards.
}
Title 3 , Chapter 5, which describe policies and procedures
for control of rodent infestations by the County Health
Officer.
The management of circumstances potentially contributing to rodent
infestation are outlined in:
i
i
Sections 7-11 .6 - 7-11 .9, which outline specific re- I ;
sponsibilities for the maintenance, repair, and inspection
of private sewers; broken side sewers are the most common
means by which rats enter homes. Responsibility for
j enforcement is shared by the Building Official and the
,
County Health Officer.
s
Section 2-5.4, which requires that automobile wrecking
establishments be rodent proofed. Enforcement of this
section is under the licensing authority of the Board of
Supervisors.
`s Sections 3-56.0 - 3-57.0, which prohibit the accumulation
of waste since it provides "a significant food source for
rodents . . . " Enforcement authority is included in the in-
spection and permit responsibilities of the County Health
Officer.
Section 3-69.0, which regulates the disposal or use of
garbage for feeding animals so as to "discourage . . .
breeding of rodents. "
Sections 3-69.4 - 3-69.5 , which require the Health Officer
to inspect and pass judgment on the ground seal at local
disposal facilities , one purpose of which is to prevent
rodent infestation.
Sections 3-69.9 - 3-70.6, which include the regulations
for operating hog farms and animal feeding yards and make
°1 specific prohibitions against nuisances and creating "rodent
harborage." Enforcement authority is conferred with annual
inspection requirements to the County Health Officer.
Section 3-1-1 .2, which directs that animal shelters and
waste storage be rodent-proof. Abatement is the responsi-
bility of the owner and County Health Officer.
Section 3-150.0, which is included in the general weed
abatement and anti-litter ordinanr�� s in Alameda Count Rne
purpose of which is to prevent a �iarborage for rodenIs.
3. Disease Control : Code sections dealing specifically with Rabies
are:
Section 2-15.5 , which empowers the County Health Officer
to destroy impounded dogs .
Section 3-46.4, which declares anti-rabies vaccination as
a prerequisite for a dog license.
Section 3-48.1 , which empowers the County Health Officer
to quarantine any animal which has bitten any person or
animal .
x
Section 3-48.2, which mandates the submission of the head
of any animal that died while under quarantine to the
laboratory of the County Health Department.
on 3-48.3 which demands that any person in charge
Sects P
of a biting animal notify the local animal control officer,
who , in turn, is responsible to forward the report to the
County Health Officer.
Code sections alluding to conditions conductive to other animal-
borne diseases are:
Section 2-13.2, which governs the certification procedures
for kennels under the authority of the County Health Officer.
Sections 2-15.2 and 3-48.0 - 3-48.6, which describe the
treatment of dogs and animals running at-large. Enforcement
authority is given to the County Health Officer.
Sections 2-15.5 and 3-50.2, which empowers the County Health
Officer to destroy impounded dogs and animals.
Section 2-95.3, which regulates pets and livestock in trailer
parks.
Section 3-48.6, which describes and proscribes animal nui-
sances .
Section 3-76.0, which authorizes the County Health Officer
to abate "dangerous or insanitary conditions.
Sections . 3-101 - 3-101 .2, which prescribe the keeping of
fowl , livestock, and rabbits , and specifically directs that
the animals ' shelter and waste storage be rodent-proof and
fly-tight. Abatement is the responsibility of the owner
and County Health Officer.
4. Solid Waste Management: Codes which cover hazardous health condi-
tions arising from improper. storage of waste are:
Title 1 , Chapter 4, which comprise the general garbage,
rubbish, and refuse ordinances for Alameda County.
Title 1 , Chapter 4 , which contains the "Alameda County
Waste Disposal Ordinance. "
Section 3-150.0 - 3-150.3, which comprise the general weed
abatement and anti-litter ordinances in Alameda County.
5. Insects: Provisions relating to the control of fleas , wasps ,
bees , spiders , flies , and miscellaneous parasites are included
in:
Sections 3-56.0 - 3-57.0, which prohibit the accumulation
of waste since it provides a "breeding media for insects
Enforcement authority is included in the inspection
and permit responsibilities of the County Health Officer.
Section 3-69.0, which regulates the disposal and use of
garbage for feeding animals so as to "discourage . . .
breeding of . . . insects. "
Sections 3-69.4 3-69.5, which require the Heal.th -Officer
to inspect and pass judgment on the ground seal at local --
disposal facilities , one purpose of which is to prevent
insect infestation.
Sections 3-69.9 3-70.6, which include the regulations
for operating hog farms , and animal feeding yards , and
make specific prohibitions against nuisances and allowing
"breeding of insects. " Enforcement authority is conferred
with annual inspection requirements to the County Health
Officer.
Title 3, ' Chapter 5, which describe policies and procedures
for fly control by the County Health Officer.
Section 3-101 .2, which directs that animal shelters and
waste storage be fly-tight. Abatement is the responsibility
of the owner and County Health Officer.
Section 3-150.0, which is included in the general weed
abatement and anti-litter ordinances in Alameda County,
one purpose of which is to prevent breeding media for insects..
C. State Laws Relating' to Vect6r' C6htr6l 'and' Vector-borne Diseases
1 . Rodent Control: Health and Safety Code :Section 1800 et seq.
The Health Officer may inspect for rodent infestations (rats ,
mice and ground squirrels) . The city council may appropriate
money for rodent control materials; and Health Officer shall
cause rodents to be exterminated if individuals fail to
correct; expense, is a charge against the city and lien is
placed on the property where work is done.
2. Rabies Control : Section 2606(a) , Title 17 , California Admin-
istrative Code, requires Health Officer to be notified when
persons are bitten by an, animal subject to rabies in offici-
ally declared "rabies areas." Alameda County has been declared
to be a "rabies area" since 1955 due to continued findings of
rabies in the county. Section 2606(b) and (c) and 2606.2 place
approval of isolation and quarantine procedure of biting ani-
mals and animal contacts under the local Health Officer. Under
Section 2606.8, the Health Officer supervises quarantine of
skunks , and prohibits capturing wild skunks for pets , other
possession of skunks or transportation of skunks.
-4-
:i
11111 1 1,11,V
Vili
I
3. Psittacosis and Other Diseases Transmitted to Man from
Birds: Sections 2100 - 2108 of the Health and Safety Code
t control banding of psittacine birds. Section 2104 gives
power to the State Heal.th Department to set regulations .
The regulations are in Title 17 of the California Admin-
istrative Code, Section 2602. Section 2602(m) .provides
that the local Health Officer may quarantine imported
birds or birds that are suspected as a source of disease
to humans or are a potential source to humans.
I
c
t
T _;LISTING VECTOR CONTROL PROGRAM IN DUBLIN
A. Analysis of vector problems
Attached is Table Number 5 which indicates the number of
vector problems reported to the Alameda County Division
of Environmental Health from Dublin in 1981-83 . :'
The following conclusions can be made from the data: _
1 . Animal bites represent approximately 50% of the
reported problem.
2 . Insect problems appear to be an increasing concern
now constituting 22% of the complaints .
3 . Since incorporation, total complaints have risen
an average of 37%/year.
u . The average level of vector problems for 3 years
is 4 . 6/1000 population over the past two years . This
compares with the County-wide median at 5 . 6 .
3. Present Vector Control Program Activities of the Division
of Environmental Health in Dublin
Program activities are devoted primarily to response to
public requests for services as follows :
1 . Vector other than biting animals :
This includes investigation of problems , public
education and enforcement activities . Staff must have
an expert knowledge of vector-borne diseases and their
biology and control of vectors . They must be able to
detect their presence through knowledge of their
"signs" and breeding and daytime hiding places . It
includes the following vector problems .
a . Rats and mice .
b . Arthropods such as cockroaches , flies , fleas , bees ,
wasps and spiders .
C . Refuse and animal wastes .
d . Other animal nuisances .
e . Reports of vector-borne diseases such as psittacosis
and salmonellosis .
2 . Rabies Control Activities:
a. Approve site of quarantine as well as initiate
quarantine of biting animals .
b . Release biting animal from quarantine.
C . Provide forms for reporting of animal bites
t
by Alameda County Field Services .
d. Evaluate and maintain statistical data for rabies
reports required by the State .
e . Process animal heads for submission for Tabora tory examination for rabies .
i f. Notify the animal bite victim or treating physi-
cian of the health status of the animal. This
will determine whether rabies treatment will be
recommended by the physician.
3 . Man Hours Spent in Vector Control in 1982:
The total man hours for rabies and other vector control
activities in 1982 were as follows :
'r
Rabies Control Other Vector Control Total
Buff Time : 31* 54* 85
istrative �9 46
Time : 17
Total: 48* 83* 131*
*Estimates only since this time .was included in
Alameda County Data in 1982.
1 • PROPOSED EXTENDED PROGRAM ACTIVITIES IN DUBLIN
A. Survey and Investigations.:
Environmental surveys will be. conducted in neighborhoods
with rodent or insect problems to determine the causes
and corrective measures required.
B. Plague Surveillance.:
Ground squirrels will be collected in order to take blood
specimens for laboratory examination for plague . Dublin
is located in the proximity of areas with a history of
plague .
-7-
C Proposed extended program activities and man hours spent:
Man Hours
1. . Routine poisoning and inspection of
creeks and sanitary sewer system -0-
2 . Ne:ie;hbor'hood surveys and investigations 150
3 . Plague surveillance 150
�� . Administrative time 162
TOTAL 462
i TOTAL MAN HOURS IN EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROGRAM: 694
ESTIMATED REVENUES FROM DUBLIN :
A . Number of estimated Benefit
Assessment Units 4 , 981
B. Estimated Benefit Assessment/BAU $3 . 10
C . Estimated Revenue from Dublin $15 ,441
PROGRAM COSTS FOR DUBLIN ACTIVI'T'IES IN COMPARISON TO
REVENUE FROM BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
A . Cost : $27 . 40 per man hour
B. Total number of man hours allocated to Dublin 593
C . Program Costs : $161248
Surplus services provided to Dublin
in dollars : $807
'Phis represents a 5 . 2% surplus of costs over revenue
derived from Dublin Benefit Assessment Units .
-8-
g
INV
ci
TABLE I
% of
N of Reported % of
County Vector Total V.C.
Population Problems of Total
Activities V.C. Time
City Served)* 1982 1982 1982
1 Alameda (6.3%) 5.0% 2.2% 1.9%
2. Albany (1.5%) 1.0% 1.2% 1.2%
3. Dublin (1.3%) 1.0%
4. aTeryville .40) 1.2%*** .3%***
5. Fremnt (13.4%) 9.6% 5.1% .3%
5.4%
6. Hayward (9.3%) 10.0%
6.7% 6.5%
7. Liverrwre (4.80) 4.9% 3.7%
4.2%
S. Newark (3.2%) 2.4% 3.3% 3.3%
9. Oakland (33.9%) 44.1%*** 57.6% 57.0%****
0. Piedmnt
(1.0%) .90 1.1%
1.3%
I. Pleasanton (3.5%) 2.5% 4.6% 4.3%
2. San Leandro (6.4%) 5.8% 4.5%
3. union city 5.1%
fi (4.1%) 2.2% 1.6% 1.90
4• Ulincorporated (11.00)
9.30 8.1% 7.5
'Population of 1,017,742 as of 01/01/82. (Excludes
Berkeley)
"'Ot available since
included in UnicOrPOrated data in 1982.
*"Reflects increased awareness
Of the Public by the Federally funded Rat
C'O"tz-01 Prograrn in Emeryville and West Oakland.
'"�rk in West Oak-land and
PrOgram, not included. Emeryville done by Federally funded Rat Control
'ePcrted vector problems for the year of 1982: 6,969.
problems gene-rated 16,016 activities and 10,387 hours of work tin,--
e
of -65 hours per activity.
1982, 92.8%
of. the work was done by the six Vector Control Officers and one
tal Services Aide.
The remainder was done
J. by Registered Sanitarians.
"5
P. 4
. j
4 -
TABLE 2
Estimated Total
Number of
City/Sanitary District Sewer Manholes
Alameda
1,500
Alban
y 500
3. Berkeley 5,000
4. Castro Valley Sanitary District 2200
5-
. amryville ,kla 165
7. Oa nd 6,000
g- Ora 14,885
I�tia Sanitary District 5,000
9• Piedmont
10. San anldro 700
L�e
1,200
TOTAL 37,150
Z' '$ estimated that approximately 45% of the total manholes would be inspected
-YYt a-�inr Folsoned during each year of operation.
•'i
..4
�r
;i
;t"
4(i
lilt
PROPOSED VECTOR CONTROL PROGRAM
TABLE 3
ALAMEDA COUNTY BENEFIT ASSESSMENT UNITS
(excluding Berkeley)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS NON-RESIDENTIAL TOTAL % of B.A.U.
' lameda 20,776 1 ,615 22,391
5.9
r
p lbany 5,566 639
. 6,205 1.6
�blin 4,445 536 41981 1 .3
ryville 2,770 836
3,006 ,g
' rerront 40,971 3,810 44,781 11,8
yward 27,369 5,062 32,431 8.6
ive ,more 15,883 7 ,592 17,475
4.6
ark 10,038 1 ,148 11 ,186
3.0
kland 116,488 18,114 134,602 35.6
teGaont 4,035 48
4,083 1 . 1
leasanton 12,069 1 ,151
13,220 3.5
' Leandro 22,372
3,323 25,695 6.8
icn City 12,377
1 ,128 13,439 3,5
�lncorporated 36167
L8991 '45;158 11 .9
330,660
47,993 378,653 100 %
p
j,
'dYy
I .
'3 PROPOSED VECTOR CONTROL PROGRAM
TABLE 4 ,
j ALAMEDA COUNTY BENEFIT ASSESSMENT UNITS
RESIDENTIAL UNITS NON-RESIDENTIAL a
s TOTAL % of B.A.U.
^ . lameda 20,776 1 ,615
22,391 5.3
lbany 5,566
639 6,205 1 .5
rkeley 34,442
4,665 39,107 9.4 - -
blip 4,445 536
4,981 1.2
eryville 2,170 836
3,006
0.7
emont 40,971
3,810 44,781 10.7
yward 27,369
5,062 32,431
vermore 15,883 7.8
1 ,592 17,475 4.2
' dark
10,038 1 ,148 �
11 ,186 2.7
kland 116,488 ,
13,114 134,602 32.2
edm.ant 4,035
48 r
-' easanton 12,069 4,083 1 .0
11151 13,220 3.2
Leandro 22,372
3,323 25,695 6. 1
on City 12,311
ncor�orated
1 ,128 13,439 3.2
3- 67
8,991
300,102
4--5,1 8 10.8
.,�.
52,658 417,760
100
Y
i
! ` TABLE 5
VECTOR PROBLEMS REPORTED BY THE PUBLIC
DUBLIN - CALENDAR YEARS
1981
1
c 982 1983*
s and mice
11 8
al bites 29
35 30
se 7 f
9 8
al wastes 2
3 l
r animals includes
tacosis Invest, 3 1 5
t s 5 ` _
8 15 T.
=i 0 3 0 �
Total T � r
50 70 67
a„
to based of January - September, )g83 data
;j1,
s
0
TABLE 6
5�
n_ r of vector control problems per - 1000 population using 3 years average for 1981 -83
} risdiCLion in Alameda County
(Arranged from Lowest to Highest Rate)
`! Problems Per/1000 •Population
Union City>t 1 . � y 3.4 _
s�
y. Pleasanton 4.4
. . 3. Piedmont 4.4
R. Dublin 4.6
5. Fremont 4.8 ,.. i
5
6. Albany `
5.0
'J. Alameda County (Unincorporated) 5.3.
8. Newark 5.6 -MEDIAN
3
Q. San Leandro 5.9
10. Livermore `
6.0
1 1 . Alameda 6.4 .0- '
z_:
12. Hayward 6.8
13. Berkeley 9.2
14. Oakland 10. 1
-=le ryvi Ile 16.4
U
Average 7.3 s
• <R
vqF_'•.