HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3.1 Approve 12-12-1983 Minutes REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 12 , 1983
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on
Monday, December 12 , 1983 in the meeting room of the Dublin Library. The
meeting was called to order at 7 : 35 p. m. by Mayor Snyder
ROLL CALL
PRESENT : Councilmembers Drena , Hegarty, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder .
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council , Staff and those present in the pledge of alleg-
iance to the flag .
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Drena , and by unanimous vote, the
Council approved the Warrant Register in the amount of $69 , 305 . 46 ; Financial
Report for Period Ending October 31 , 1983 , Denied claim of Jaime McEntee and
directed Staff to notify claimant and insurance company; Waived reading and
adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 16 — 83
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE
PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES ;
adopted
RESOLUTION NO. • 70 - 83
ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL MAP
TRACT NO. 4719 ;
adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 71 - 83
ACCEPT DEPOSIT IN LIEU - TRACT NO. 4719 ;
adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 72 - 83
APPROVING LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECTS AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF SAID AGREEMENT;
CM-2-228
December 12, 1984
ORDINANCE REGULATING SIGNS & BANNERS - PUBLIC HEARING
At its meeting of September 12 , 1983 , the City Council considered a request
for an encroachment permit to hang a banner in the public right-of-way . As a
result of the discussion with respect to this request , the City Council
directed Staff to prepare a policy with respect to the installation of
banners in the public right-of-way.
Since that .meeting , Staff determined that in order to institute such a
policy, the County Ordinance which the City adopted by reference, must be
modified . This Ordinance presently regulates the placement of signs in the
public right-of-way.
The City Attorney prepared an Ordinance which supersedes the County ' s
Ordinance and provides for the establishment of a policy regulating public
service banners . Since this Ordinance impacts the visibility and safety of
motorists and pedestrians along the City ' s highways , the Ordinance was
prepared in such a manner that it should be adopted on an urgency basis .
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing .
No one from the public wished to address this subject .
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing .
Cm. Moffatt questioned whether utility poles and their guide wires were on
public or private property . City Manager Ambrose and City Attorney Nave
explained that they are in the public right-of-way.
Cm. Moffatt questioned who would enforce . City Manager Ambrose explained
that the County would remove illegal signs . Cm. Moffatt asked if political
signs would be allowed . Council consensus was that campaign signs would not
be allowed .
It was clarified that the $500 fine would apply per act rather than per sign.
Cm. Drena questioned if the fine could be stated as "not less than the cost
of removal" . City Attorney Nave explained that the fines are mandated by
state law.
Cm. Jeffery felt it would be ideal if there were one location in town that
allowed these types of signs .
It was reported that the Chamber of Commerce is working toward having this
type of a location . Staff was asked to determine if the location is on
public or private property.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt , seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and adopted
CM-2-229
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
ORDINANCE NO. 17 - 83
PROHIBITING THE POSTING OF SIGNS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY AND
REGULATING THE PLACEMENT OF BANNERS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 73 - 83
APPROVING A POLICY OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ADVERTIZING BANNERS
WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
REVISION TO SALES TAX ORDINANCE - PUBLIC HEARING
The City has received a request from the State Board of Equalization for the
City to amend its existing sales tax ordinance . The amendment will delete
the exemption for operators of waterborne vessels . The State has requested
the City adopt the ordinance prior to December 15 , 1983 .
The City Attorney reviewed the ordinance and indicated that the amendment
will in no way affect Dublin ' s present sales tax litigation with Alameda
County.
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing .
No one from the audience wished to address this subject .
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing .
On motion of Cm. Moffatt , seconded by Cm. Drena, and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and adopted on an urgency basis
ORDINANCE NO. 18 - 83
TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 8-82 IMPOSING A SALES AND USE TAX
TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - PUBLIC HEARING
At its meeting of October 24 , 1983 , the City Council directed Staff to amend
the Subdivision Ordinance with respect to park dedication fees . Staff
prepared a draft ordinance for Council consideration which provides that the
City will be the local agency that receives park dedication land or fees .
Under the previously adopted ordinance, DSRSD received such land or fees .
The draft ordinance also contains amendments consistent with the Ordinance
Establishing the Jurisdiction of the Planning Director and Planning
Commission, the Grading Ordinance, and the most recent changes to the State
Subdivision Map Act .
CM-2-230
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing .
Liz Schmitt , Cypress Court , questioned if this meant that the City or DSRSD -
would get future money .
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing .
Cm. Jeffery felt the Council needed to set a future meeting date for
discussion to clarify fees already collected.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and adopted on an urgency basis
ORDINANCE NO. 19 - 83
AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 8
OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN
and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 74 - 83
ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATION AREA
REQUIREMENTS FOR USE WITH THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF DUBLIN
ORDINANCE ADOPTING 1982 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING CODE, MECHANICAL
CODE, HOUSING CODE AND PROCEDURE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS, SUBSTANDARD
OR ILLEGAL BUILDINGS - PUBLIC HEARING
Section 17958 of the Health and Safety Code ( H&SC) requires the City to adopt
an Ordinance that imposes the same requirements as the regulations of the
State Building Standards Code . The State has adopted these codes . Section
17958 . 5 ( H&SC ) provides that the City may make modifications to these codes
as the City determines are reasonably necessary because of climatic,
georgraphical , or topographical conditions and on the basis of local
conditions .
This proposed ordinance is basically the County Ordinance which has been
modified to meet the City of Dublin ' s requirements . The changes from the
County Ordinance were described . Most of the amendments to the model codes
were changed so as to agree with the State regulations .
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing .
No one from the audience wished to address this subject .
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing .
CM-2-231
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and introduced an ordinance providing for the
repeal of certain County Ordinances relating to building regulations .. adopted.
by Dublin Ordinance No . 1 and extended by Dublin Ordinance NO. 13 and the
adoption of new building regulations for the City of Dublin and further
providing for the adoption of regulations for grading .
LIVERMORE-AMADOR VALLEY WASTEWATER PLANNING STUDY CAPACITY
STEERING COMMITTEE
The City of Pleasanton and DSRSD are presently undertaking a major wastewater
management planning study for the Livermore-Amador Valley. The Consultant
coordinating the overall valleywide study has requested those agencies with
land use planning authority to designate a member of the Council and a
planning staff member to represent each jurisdiction on a Wastewater Capacity
Steering committee which will provide input to the engineering consultants
who are performing the study.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the
Council determined that the Dublin representatives on this committee will be
Mayor Peter W. Snyder and Planning Director Laurence L. Tong .
NOISE ORDINANCE
At the City Council meeting of October 24 , 1983 , the City Council requested
the City Attorney and City Staff to review different types of noise
ordinances ; and bring back to the City Council an ordinance which would
address all types of noise rather than solely noise emitted from audio
equipment . The City Attorney prepared and presented two draft ordinances .
The first ordinance applies a " reasonable person" standard which would enable
a police officer to act as a witness and apply a standard of reasonableness
of noise based on certain criteria . The second ordinance is much more
technical in nature and would establish levels of noise ( defined in decibels )
in the various general zoning districts in the City.
The City Council reviewed both ordinances .
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Drena, and by unanimous vote, the
Council established the date of January 23 , 1984 for a public hearing related
to ordinance no . 1 .
TRAFFIC STUDY
DUBLIN BOULEVARD @ CLARK AVENUE and LEWIS AVENUE @ VILLAGE PARKWAY
At the City Council meeting of October 24 , 1983 , the City Council received a
request from Mr . Gerald Abernathy, 6699 Maple Drive , requesting traffic
safety investigations of the intersections of Dublin Boulevard @ Clark
Avenue , Village Parkway and Lewis Avenue . The Traffic Engineer , in his
CM-2-232
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
report , indicated both locations to be marginally warranted for the
installation of traffic signals and further , that signals should eventually ,
be installed at both locations.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote, the
Council agreed to include intersection signal improvements in the next
revision of the Capital Improvement Program.
RECESS
A short recess was called . All Councilmembers were present when the meeting
reconvened .
DUBLIN BOULEVARD PLAN LINE STUDY - STATUS REPORT
In accordance with the 1983-84 approved City budget, the City ' s Traffic
Engineer and City Engineer are currently developing long term recommendations
for Dublin Boulevard . A report was presented to the Council presenting the
current status and the interim recommendations for Dublin Boulevard.
The City also received requests from 2 property owners regarding
modifications to Dublin Boulevard . The City has had for some time , a request
from the Shell Oil Station at the intersection of San Ramon Road and Dublin
Boulevard for a median break . The City has also received a request from
Imperial Freeholds regarding a requirement that they signalize the entrance
to their proposed development which is located near the intersection of
Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court .
Tony Long addressed the Council and indicated the purchase of property in
March , 1981 from the Murray School District . They have plans to build an
office complex that will be 75% larger than Heritage Park , which is currently
the largest in Dublin . Putting in a street light was a condition of the
project .
Following discussion, Council consensus was for Mr . Long to get together with
Chris Kinzel to discuss possible alternatives . Also, Staff was directed to
write a letter to DSRSD with regard to pursuing the land swap alternative .
Liz Schmitt , Cypress Court indicated she would like to see sidewalks along
Dublin Boulevard.
George Zika, Peppertree Road, indicated he would be very upset if commuter
parking was reduced .
Scott Thompson felt the Council should consider some type of arrangement with
DSRSD whereby parking at the Sports Grounds could be used when sporting
events are not taking place .
CM-2-233
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
i
GENERAL PLAN WORKING PAPER #3 - DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION REVIEW
At its meeting of December 6 , 1983 the City Council discussed the potential
extension of Dublin Boulevard to the east of the City. At that meeting, Mr .
Jim Gelderman, who owns property on Dougherty_ Road in the affected area ,
requested the City Council be more specific in its road designation in order
that he may adequately plan for the development of his property.
Chris Kinzel presented the Staff report .
Mr . Gelderman indicated he had had this property since 1968 .
Following discussion, it was agreed that Mr . Gelderman and his engineers
would meet with Chris Kinzel to come up with possible alternatives related to
this property.
BARRATT SAN JOSE REQUEST TO ACQUIRE LAND IN
SAN RAMON ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
On May 23 , 1983 , the City Council , with the applicant ' s agreement , continued
the public hearing on Barratt San Jose ' s Planned Development Rezoning and
Tentative Map until after adoption of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan.
On September 26 , 1983 , the City Council approved the San Ramon Road Specific
Plan - Area 5 , with a land use designation of Multi-family Residential, 8-15
dwelling units per acre .
The applicant is now preparing a revised proposal for their land in Area 5 .
The applicant has indicated an interest in 0 . 9 + acre portion of the City
right-of-way, along San Ramon Road south of Silvergate Drive. The applicant
is requesting the City to enter into negotiations to sell the land to the
applicant so that they can include the area in their revised proposal .
A sale of the property, or granting permission to make application would in
no way commit the City to a particular development proposal . The applicant ' s
preliminary concept of 40 condominium units and 48 townhouse units, or any
other development proposal would have to be considered on its own merits and
processed accordingly.
Cm. Hegarty felt the applicant should come back to the Council with this
request when they have a proposal to submit .
Cm. Drena indicated he had grave concerns regarding the City selling off any
of its land .
On motion of Cm. Moffatt , seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by majority vote, the
Council directed Staff to enter into negotiations for the sale of the
property and bring the item back to the Council for final action; and gave
the applicant permission to incorporate the City right-of-way in revised
proposal . Voting NO on this motion- was Cm. Drena .
CM-2-234
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES
Mr . Gerald Wynn , Director , Division of Environmental Health, Alameda County
Health Care Services Agency, made a presentation to the Council . The Board
of Supervisors can create a County Service Area for the provision of Vector
Control Services and cities may be included in this County Service Area by a
majority vote of the City Council .
Following Mr . Wynn ' s presentation , the Council consensus was that this
program would be taken under consideration and the subject would be dealt
with at a later date .
FALLON SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION
At a previous City Council meeting , the Council instructed Staff to determine
the requirements of utilizing the provisions of the Naylor Bill to acquire
recreation facilities at the Fallon School site . A resolution was presented
which included the findings necessary to qualify under the state legislation
which allows a portion of the property to be purchased at 25% of market
value .
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote , the
Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 75 - 83
ADOPTING A PLAN FOR THE PURCHASE OF SURPLUS SCHOOL PROPERTY AND
NOTIFYING THE MURRAY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY ' S INTENT TO PURCHASE OR
LEASE ALL OR A PORTION OF THE FALLON SCHOOL SITE
AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATED THERETO
NO RIGHT TURN ON RED - STATUS REPORT
AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD @ DONAHUE DRIVE
A status report was presented with statistics regarding this sign which was
put in approximately 6 months ago .
Because of the cost of sign removal , it was consensus of Council to leave the
sign in prohibiting right turns on red lights .
MEDIAN LANDSCAPING CONCEPT REVIEW
As part of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, median landscaping
projects on Dublin Boulevard; Amador Valley Boulevard and Village Parkway,
together with a downtown street tree program, were scheduled for construction
in the 1983-84 and years following , with Amador Valley Boulevard and part of
the street tree program slated for this fiscal year .
CM-2-235
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
A slide presentation was made by Ken Hansen with the firm of Robert M .
Babcock and Associates , Landscape Architects .
Cm. Jeffery indicated she did not like the lawn alternative as it was very
expensive to maintain .
The majority of the Council were interested in street trees with no lawn and
a raised planter concept .
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - APRIL 10 , 1984
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the
Council determined that voting polls would be open from 7 : 00 a .m. until 8 : 00
p.m, and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 76 - 83
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10 , 1984
FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OF OFFICERS OF SAID CITY
On motion of Mayor Snyder , seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by majority vote, the
Council determined that candidate ' s statements would be paid for by the
candidate and would be limited to 200 words , and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 77 - 83
ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE
PERTAINING TO THE CANDIDATE ' S STATEMENT AND THE COSTS THEREOF
FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ON TUESDAY, APRIL 10 , 1984
Voting NO on this motion were Cm. Moffatt and Cm. Jeffery.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt , seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the
Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 78 - 83
ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 17 , 1984 TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGREEMENT TO COLLECT SPECIAL DRAINAGE AREA 7-1 FEES
This program was instituted in 1966 . Fees were collected by the Alameda
County Building Inspection Department . This proposal is to continue that
program, except that the fees would now be collected by the City of Dublin
Building Inspection Department .
CM-2-236
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Moffatt , and by unanimous vote, the
Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 79 - 83
CONCURRING IN A SPECIAL DRAINAGE AREA PROGRAM FOR ZONE 7
OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Staff was also directed to contact Alameda County to determine the status of
the money in reserve .
ADDITION OF CITY STREETS TO THE FAU SYSTEM
A number of months ago, the State ( CalTrans ) requested cities to review and
recommend changes in their Federal Aid to Urban Systems . The City Engineer
requested that certain streets or portions of streets be added to the City' s
existing FAU system and an extension of the City ' s urban limits . The purpose
of these extensions was to give the City more flexibility in finding eligible
projects within the City for FAU funding .
The street extensions are Dougherty Road from Dublin Boulevard north to the
Cita, limit ; Amador Valley Boulevard, Village Parkway to Dougherty Road; and
Davona Drive, Alcosta Boulevard to Village Parkway.
Staff has already applied for FAU monies on the new Amador Valley Boulevard
extension and has been successful in its completion within the tri-valley
area for funding .
The FAU funding is apportioned to eligible projects on an 86% Federal, 140
local matching basis .
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the
Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 80 - 83
DETERMINING URBAN LIMITS , FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROADS,
AND DESIGNATING CERTAIN ROADS TO BE IN THE FEDERAL AID SYSTEM
OTHER BUSINESS
Village Parkway Fencing
A draft letter to residents with fences bordering- Village Parkway was
presented for Council review. Revisions were made and Council authorized the
letter to be sent .
CM-2-237
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984
Campaign Contribution Limitations
Cm . Drena requested that the subject of limiting campaign contributions be
placed on the next City Council agenda for discussion .
Utilization of Camp Parks for Housing the Homeless
It was requested that Staff communicate with Representative Stark and
Supervisor Excell and develop a dialogue in an effort to determine the impact
this program would have on Dublin.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council , at 12 :50 a .m.
the meeting was adjourned .
Mayor
ATTEST :
City Clerk
CM-2-238
Regular Meeting December 12, 1984