HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.1 Amador Vly Blvd Traffic Study CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 22, 1984
SUBJECT Amador Valley Boulevard Traffic Study
( San Ramon Road to Village Parkway)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED 1 ) Notice to Property Owners fronting Village Parkway;
2 ) Summary of Amador Valley Boulevard Traffic Study
west of Village Parkway;
3 ) Amador Valley Boulevard Traffic Study (San Ramon
Road to Dougherty Road) ;
4 ) Copy of proposed Plan Line Improvements ( this
exhibit will be presented at the meeting )
RECOMMENDATION 1 ) Hear Staff Report
2 ) Open discussion to public
3 ) Set a public hearing date for plan line adoption
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The estimated cost of improvements will be prepared
and incorporated with the 1985 update to the Capital
Improvement Program
DESCRIPTION At the direction of the City Council, traffic studies
of major arterials have been conducted. This report will focus on the
second phase of Amador Valley Boulevard which includes the section from San
Ramon Road to Village Parkway.
This meeting is intended to be utilized as a work session for the City
Council and interested members of the general public. . It will allow for a
Staff presentation of proposed changes to the property owners fronting
Amador Valley Boulevard and will elicit public feedback . The proposed plan
line will alter access in and out of some parcels, therefore, this study
session is being held in advance of the public hearing .
The summary indicates that the speed limit will be maintained at 25 miles
per hour . This was inadvertently included in the Phase II summary. The
speed limit for the section of Amador Valley Boulevard from Village Parkway
to San Ramon Road will be determined in the comprehensive Traffic
Engineering Study. The results of this report will be presented to the City
Council at a later date in a comprehensive format .
Staff recommends that 1 ) the City Council review the proposed plan and point
out any concerns which need further investigation; 2 ) the City Council set a
public hearing date which will provide property owners and tenants time to
review plans at City Offices and study the specific impacts .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO: All Adjacent Property Owners
ITEM NO. 8.1
CITY OF DUBLIN
J
P.O. BON 2340 (415) 829-4600
Dublin, CA 9.1568
NOTICE TO AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD FRONTAGE OWNERS
AMADOR VALLEY TRAFFIC STUDY
Dear Property Owner:
The City Council of Dublin will be holding hea the Dublin Libra�n Y to
Monday, October 22, 1984 at 7 : 0 3 p.
t f l
hear results and recommendations
inovited to attend study mat
hear
Valley Boulevard.
presentation, ask questions, and make comments .
The Council will set a formal public hearing date sometime during
the month of November to plan incorporate
so ultimate neededimprovement
eapital
configurations into a road p
improvements to the street can be planned in a orderly manner,
and serve the present and future traffic needs of the street.
Attached is a summary of the study
able a e City nda ion 6500 Dublin
report and plan ex hibit is avail
Boulevard.
� ncerely,
Richard C. Ambrose
City Manager
RCA/cf
Attachment
wt
SUMMARY OF AMA OR VALLE LA OE PARKWAY RAFFIC STUDY
I . Purposes
A. To define the future street and lane requirements for Amador
Valley Boulevard.
B. To resolve traffic access issues along Amador Valley Boulevard.
-C. To determine signalization requirements at intersections along
Amador Valley Boulevard.
D . To review and determine striping needs on a short term basis .
E. To review and recommend short term :and :long term lighting needs
along Amador Valley Boulevard.' ',
F. To defin and ecommend shorterm'^ and' long 'term "improvement
projects for Amador Valley Boulevard.
II . Recommendations
A. Street Width
1 . West of Village Parkway, from San Ramon Road to Village
Parkway, the lane pattern should remain as four lanes divided
with separate left-turn lanes at intersections.
B. Intersection Configuration
1 . At San Ramon Road, the intersection should be widened to
provide a two-way access on the west leg . and to provide a
westbound free right-turn lane. A through lane, a left-turn
lane and a free right-turn lane are recommended for the
eastbound approach.
2 . At Amador Plaza Road, the storage length of the westbound
left-turn lane should be increased to 300 feet. Also, it is
recommended that the median nose setback on the west leg of
the intersection be increased.
3 . At Village Parkway, it is recommended that an eastbound
right-turn lane be added by restriping the existing pavement.
This improvement will necessitate relocating a short segment
of the existing eastbound bike lane west of Village Parkway.
The storage lengths of the eastbound and westbound left-turn
lanes should be increased. In addition, a dual left-turn
lane is recommended for the northbound approach.
C . Access
The closing of the median opening east of Amador Plaza Road is
recommended due to the required lengthening of the westbound
left-turn lane east of the Amador Plaza Road intersection .
Because of the required lengthening of the eastbound left-turn
lane at the Village Parkway intersection, the closing of the
median opening approximately 200 feet west of the intersection is
also recommended.
-1-
D . Traffic Control Measures
1 . Signalization
ffic signal will be needed at Amador Plaza
a . A future tra
Road. Amador Valley Boulevard
b . Coordination of signals along
will be very desirable after installation of the Amador
Plaza Road signal .
2 , Other Control Measures
a. :. speed limit
The existing 25 mph
should be retained.
E. Amador Valley Boulevard Extension .
1, Boulevard to the west, passing
An extension of Amador Valley
San Ramon Road, has been proposed and approved. By extending
Amador Valley Boulevard westerly, it will provide better
access to the major undeveloped parcels .
F . New I-680 Interchange
1 . A new full or partial interchange connecting Dublin streets
with I-680 is recommended.
G. Lighting
has
1 . Repairs and impro isms improvement programs which includesy city near
an on-going light g
term improvement plans for Amador Valley Boulevard from
Dougherty Road to San Ramon Road.
H. , Improvement Projects and Priorities
1 , Areas felt to require attention on a short term basis include
the improvement of the Amador Valley Boulevard/San Ramon Road
intersection, the restriping of the Village Parkway
intersection, and the modification and signalization of the
Amador Plaza Road intersection.tI se interchange .
A long term need is the
construction of a n
-2-