Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 5.4 Planning Consult Downtown Improve Plan 00 -� � AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 12 , 1985 SUBJECT: Planning Consultant for Downtown Improvement Plan EXHIBITS ATTACHED: A. Draft Agreement for Consultant Services B. Planning Consultant Proposal RECOMMENDATION: 1 . Approve hiring of Wurster , Bernardi , and Emmons , Inc. 2 . Authorize City Manager to execute agreement . FINANCIAL STATEMENT : $65 , 000 fob Planning Consultant services ; overall project consultant costs to be $88 , 000 to $102, 000 . The budget for Fiscal Year 1985-1986 contains $80 , 000 for Downtown Improvement Plan consultant services . It is recommended that action on a budget transfer be deferred until the costs for the economic and transportation consultants are finalized. DESCRIPTION: On October 14 , 1985 , the City Council directed Staff to select a Planning Consultant and have a Draft Contract and Scope of Services prepared for City Council approval prior to entering into the contract . Staff has interviewed various Planning Consultants and recommends the selection of Wurster , Bernardi , and Emmon, Inc. (WBE) . WBE has worked on a number of planning projects, including the Danville Downtown. Master Plan and the Pleasant Hill Core Area Redevelopment Plan . The firm has also worked on specific design projects such as Ghirardelli Square in San Francisco. The WBE proposal ( See Exhibit B ) for the Dublin Downtown Improvement Plan involves three ( 3 ) distinct phases : 1 . Identification of issues , options , and alternatives . 2 . Preparation of a consensus plan. 3 . Preparation of a specific plan and implementation program. The proposal puts emphasis on consensus building throughout the process . The preliminary schedule calls for the Downtown Improvement Plan to be before the City Council in twelve ( 12 ) months for adoption. That timing would be consistent with the City Council desire to have the Plan brought to it by November 1986 . Larry Cannon, Executive Vice President and Principal with WBE, would be the project manager . Staff has prepared a Draft Contract ( see Exhibit A) which includes the WBE proposal as part of the appendix . Staff recommends that the City Council approve the hiring of WBE and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement . ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. ' `• COPIES TO: E X AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES 1 . CLIENT AND CONSULTANT AGREEMENT. The following terms and conditions constitute an Agreement dated , 198 , between the City of Dublin (hereafter referred to as CLIENT) and Wurster, Bernardi, and Emmons, Inc. (hereafter referred to as CONSULTANT) , for Planning services in conjunction with work to be performed under the direction of the Dublin Planning Department . 2 . SCOPE OF SERVICES/WORK. The consultant shall provide the CLIENT with the scope of service/work described in APPENDIX A attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. It is specifically understood and agreed that in the making and performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and is not and shall not be construed to be an employee, agent, or servant of the CLIENT. 4 . INTEREST OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT covenants that he/she presently has no interest and shall not acquire an interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed under this Agreement . CONSULTANT further covenants that to the best of its knowledge, no person having any such interest shall be employed in the performance of this Agreement . 5 . EXCLUSIVE SERVICES . CONSULTANT agrees to restrict its firm and its subcontractors from any employment, other than the CLIENT, in any way pertaining to the subject of this employment or to the proposed project which this report will review, for a period of two years after the effective date of this agreement without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such employment . CONSULTANT further agrees to insert this condition into all contracts or work agreements with his subcontractors . 6 . PUBLICATION, REPRODUCTION AND USE OF MATERIAL. No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CLIENT shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use, in whole or in part , any reports, data, or other materials prepared under this Agreement . If the CLIENT discloses to any other party any reports, data or other material prepared by the CONSULTANT, the CLIENT must make reference to any final report prepared under this Agreement by the CONSULTANT. 7 . FINDINGS CONFIDENTIAL. Any reports, information or data given to or prepared or assembled by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall not be. made available to any individual or organization by the CONSULTANT without the prior written approval of the CLIENT. CONSULTANT is entitled to retain copies of all data working papers, interim documents, memoranda and reports produced under this Agreement for use in the normal conduct of its business, except that no confidential information will be disclosed, provided, however , that nothing contained herein shall prevent the disclosure of such information if compelled by legal process, and in the event thereof, only after notice to CLIENT. 8 . CHANGES. The Agreement between CLIENT AND CONSULTANT and this supplement of terms and conditions is the only agreement between the parties and supersedes all negotiations , proposals, notices of award, agreements, and understandings written or oral heretofore had between the parties relating to the work to be performed. If changes are requested by either party, including any changes in the scope of services, any increase or decrease in the amount of the CONSULTANT 's compensation, they must be agreed to in writing and signed by both parties. -1- t 9 . PAYMENT. Payment for services shall be on a time and materials basis not to exceed the WBE Budget Estimate totals for each of the three specified phases, not including the work of the economic or transportation consultants . At the end of each calendar month during the term of this Agreement CONSULTANT shall submit an invoice detailing the hours of work recorded and the expenses incurred in the performance of his agreement . CLIENT may specify that a progress report accompany each invoice . Payment for services by the CONSULTANT shall be at the following rates : 1 . Planning /hour 2 . Reimbursable expenses a . $ . 25/mile for travel during working hours excluding travel to and from office b. film, drafting materials, and the like, at cost with each invoice. The CLIENT shall retain ten percent ( 10% ) of the payment . The CLIENT shall forward the retained payment within 20 days of completion of the consultant work and final acceptance by the CLIENT. The 10% retention may be released after completion of each of the three specified phases if found acceptable by the City. Except for the 10% retention specified above, within 20 days of receipt of each invoice, CLIENT shall forward payment to CONSULTANT for all items on the invoice that are not in dispute and CLIENT and CONSULTANT will proceed to negotiate, arbitrate or litigate the disputed items as specified elsewhere in this Agreement . 10 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE. If CLIENT considers CONSULTANT to be in default of any of the terms of this Agreement , CLIENT shall give CONSULTANT written notice of such default specifying the manner in which he considers CONSULTANT to be in default . CONSULTANT shall then have 10 days in which to cure said default . If after 10 days the default is not cured, the CLIENT may terminate the Agreement . In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographics and reports or other material prepared by the CONSULTANT through this Agreement shall, at the option of the CLIENT, become the property of the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive an amount which bears the same ratio to the total compensation under this Agreement as the services actually performed bear to the total services of the CONSULTANT covered by this Agreement less payments of compensation previously made . 11 . TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CLIENT OR CONSULTANT. The CLIENT may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the CONSULTANT of such termination, specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen days before the effective date of such termination. Within 5 working days after such termination, CONSULTANT shall submit a final notice to CLIENT, which CLIENT shall pay in full within 20 days of receipt of invoice, excepting any items that are in dispute. The CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement in the similar fashion as described above for the CLIENT, at lease fifteen days before the effective date of such termination. 12 . PREVENTION OF PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT shall not be in default under this Agreement if its performance is prevented or hindered by an act of God, fire, riot, labor disturbances ( including, without limitations, lockouts ) , accidents, wars, acts of any government (whether foreign or domestic, federal, state, county or municipal ) , partial or total interruption of loss or shortage of transportation facilities , or by any other causes beyond the control of the parties . So long as the impossibility continues the time for performance under the contract is extended. -2- t J 13 . ARBITRATION. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration procedures in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association and judgment upon any awards rendered by the Arbitrators shall be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 14 . CALIFORNIA LAW. The interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 15 . CAPTIONS . The captions inserted herein are inserted only as a matter of convenience and for reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope of this contract nor the intent of any of the provisions thereof . 16 . NOTICE. Wherever notice is required to be given under the terms of this Agreement, it shall be in writing and shall be effective the day it is mailed, properly addressed to the party to receive such notice. Notice delivered other than by mail shall be effective when received. When notice is to be given by CLIENT, unless otherwise provide, shall be mailed or delivered to: Richard Ambrose, City Manager City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. Ste. D Dublin, CA 94568 Notice to CONSULTANT, unless otherwise provided shall be addressed to: 17 . COMPENSATION FOR TESTIMONY ' AND PREPARATION THEREOF. If any legal action other than action that is the result of incompetence or malfeasance by the CONSULTANT, is brought against the CLIENT by any third party in connection with matters which are the subject of this Agreement, and it becomes necessary for CONSULTANT or any employee thereof or any subcontractor to testify, provide information or produce material in any such action, or if the CLIENT requests such involvement, the CLIENT shall compensate the CONSULTANT and any such employee or subcontractor for time so spent at CONSULTANT or subcontractor ' s standard rates then in effect and for any expenses, including attorney' s fees, reasonably incurred in connection with such testimony or production or the preparation thereof . . Such compensation shall be in addtion to the maximum charge for services defined in the Agreement . -3- 18 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF: CLIENT and CONSULTANT have accepted the above terms and conditions and have incorporated them into this Agreement . These signatures attest the parties ' agreement hereto: CITY OF DUBLIN By Date: City of Dublin CONSULTANT by: Date: ( Designate official capacity; in the business ) by: Date: (Designate official capacity in the business) Note to CONSULTANT: ( 1 ) Execute acknowledgement form below, and ( 2 ) if a corporation, signatures must conform to designated representative groups pursuant to Corporations Code Sec. 313 . State of California ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (by Corporation, ) ss Partnership, or individual ) County of On this day of , in the year before me personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed the within instrument as proprietor or as president (or secretary) or on behalf of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it . DATED: (NOTARIAL SEAL) Notary Public -4- t APPENDIX A Appendix A shall include the Scope of Work , Preliminary Schedule and WBE Budget Estimate as specified in the Dublin Downtown Improvement Plan - Planning Consultation Proposal, October 31 , 1985 , prepared by Wurster , Bernardi, and Emmons, Inc. 1 J WBE Ralph O.Butterfield AIA Larry L.Cannon AIA,AICP ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS November 1, 1985 Mr. Lawrence L. Tong Planning Director City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Boulevard P. 0. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 Dear Larry: This proposal for planning consultation services is based upon the draft material I supplied to you earlier. Per your request, I have added some environmental assessment assistance during the plan preparation stage. This work will be performed by Environmental Impact Planning Corporation of San Francisco. I have enclosed background materials on their firm. The Scope of Work and schedule proposed is based upon the assumption that an increase in downtown land utilization and the development of a greater sense of image and place will require the establishment of a very close working relationship between the City, property owners and major merchants. The budget proposed is my best estimate at this time of the hours and expenses necessary to carry out the Scope of Work . It does not include the cost of an economic consultant which I feel will be in the range of $15 ,000 to $25 ,000 , nor the cost of your transportation consultant which will probably be in the $8,000 to ' $12 ,000 range. Should be proposed budget exceed the City's desired allocation, I will be happy to work with you to adjust the Scope. of Work to coincide with the available funding level. This project is a very challenging one I look forward to working with you and the Downtown Improvements Study Committee to see that a strong plan tied to an implementation program is developed with the broadest possible community support . If you have any questions concerning this proposal, please let me know. Very truly yours, W STER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. Larry L. Ca non Executive V ce President LLC:hs Enclosure 415 - 3 97-6 544 WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 CONTENTS SCOPE OF WORK PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE WBE BUDGET ESTIMATE WBE EXPERIENCE WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 DUBLIN DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN Dublin, California November 4, 1985 SCOPE OF WORK PHASE 1: ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION Time Frame: 4 months Task 1.1: Background Review Review of all existing City and Consultant data. Task 1.2: Base Maps Assemble base maps and obtain air photo of Study Area. Task 1.3 : Preliminary Background Meetings Meet with City staff and with current City Traffic Consultant. Task 1.4: Existing Conditions Survey Map existing uses and land ownerships. Task 1.5 : Initial Study Committee Meeting Review issues, concerns and ideas . Organize for survey of property owners and merchants . Task 1.6: Site Analysis Prepare visual site analysis and identify opportunity areas. Evaluate larger area context. Task 1.7 : Select Interviews Interview up to 10 individuals identified by the City to obtain an overview of concerns to supplement the Study Committee input. Individuals might include City Council Members, Planning Commissioners, business interests , special interest group spokespeople, etc. Task 1.8: B.A.R.T. Meeting Meet with B.A.R.T. staff to discuss future plans in the Study Area. WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 941 3 3 Task 1.9 : Property Owner/Merchant Survey Prepare, distribute, collect and evaluate a survey to determine plans, attitudes, concerns , and willingness to cooperate with public and other private entities. Task 1.10: Resident Survey Prepare , distribute and evaluate a : survey of a representative sampling of Dublin residents, to determine shopping patterns and attitudes toward uses in the Study Area. Task 1.11: Market Overview Prepare a Market Overview to evaluate future expectations of retail and commercial performance in the Study Area relative to projected competitive development in the region. Identify potential new land uses and their order of magnitude. Identify market opportunities and constraints . Task 1.12: Select Property Owner/Merchant Interviews In concert with the Study Committee meet with a representative selection of current property owners and merchants to amplify the information gained from the surveys . Task 1.13 : Development Parameters Identification Estimate development intensity parameters and constraints based upon the projected circulation system, public transit plans and property owner plans. Task 1.14: Preliminary Issues, Options and Alternatives Plans Identification Prepare a summary report covering all elements of this phase and outlining a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of the specific issues and options. Identify alternative overall approaches to address the specific issues of continued commercial vitality, creation of. a civic image, and low existing land utilization. Task 1.15: Alternative Implementation Strategies Identify potential public and private projects. Identify and evaluate alternative public and private sources of funding. Outline potential implementation strategies. WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9413 3 Task 1.16: Property Owner/Merchant Meeting Review materials with Owners and Merchants. Task 1.17: Public Presentation Assist the Study Committee in presenting the issues, options, alternative plans approaches and alternative implementation strategies to Dublin residents in a public meeting. Task 1.18: Additional Presentations Assist the Study Comm ittee in special informational presentations to the Chamber of Commerce and up to three other groups. Task 1.19 : Joint Work Session Assist the Study Committee in conducting a joint work session with the City Council and Planning Commission to establish a firm direction for Phase 2 work. Task 1.20 : Study Committee Meetings Attend regularly scheduled meetings of the Downtown Improvement Study Committee during the course of the Phase 1 Work . Meetings not noted above are estimated to be four (4) in number. WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9413 3 PHASE 2: DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN Time Frame: 4 months Task 2.1: Downtown Improvement Study Committee Meeting Meet with the Study, Committee to confirm the direction for the Downtown Improvement Plan and to establish responsibilities for additional meetings and input to the plan. Task 2.2: Preliminary Downtown Plan Prepare a preliminary plan to outline specific physical changes to include the following: A. New Future Projects B. Future Intensification Projects C. Circulation and Parking Plan D. Pedestrian Circulation Plan E. Landscaping and Urban Design Plan F. Development Standards G. Public Sector Improvements Plan H. Preliminary Cost estimates In conjunction with the Preliminary Downtown Plan, an environmental assessment will be prepared to allow an understanding of the plans impacts and to compare the plan with the existing General Plan. Task 2.3 : Preliminary Implementation Strategy Identify potential sources of revenues to cover improvement costs and outline options for public and private sector agreements to accomplish the implementation of the plan. Also identify any necessary public actions which may be necessary (e.g. , establishment of a parking district or allowance for joint-use parking facilities) . Task 2.4: Downtown Improvement Study Committee Work Session Review the preliminary plan and options with the Study Committee to establish a definitive plan approach. WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 , Task 2.5: Property Owners/Merchant's Meeting Assist the Study Committee in reviewing the Preliminary Plan with the affected property Owners and merchants. This task may take two or more meetings but its intent is to emerge with a consensus on a physical plan and implementation framework (including financing) which is acceptable both to the Committee and to the affected parties. Task 2.6 : Joint Work Session Assist the Study Committee in conducting a joint work session with the City Council and Planning Commission to refine the elements of the Preliminary Downtown Plan and Implementation Strategy. Task 2.7 : Recommended Downtown Plan The consensus plan developed in the tasks above will be refined for public review. A comprehensive report will be prepared for limited distribution to the City decision-makers. A concise Summary Report will be prepared for broader distribution. Task 2.8: Planning Commission Public Hearing Task 2.9: City Council Public Hearing Task 2.10 : Study Committee Meetings Attend regularly scheduled meetings of the Downtown Meetings of the Downtown Improvement Study Committee during the course of the Phase 2 work. Meetings not noted above are estimated to be three (3) . WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9413 3 PHASE 3: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Time Frame: 3 months Task 3 .1: Preliminary Specific Plan Prepare a Draft Specific Plan for the Downtown Area. Task 3 .2: Preliminary Implementation Plan Prepare an Implementation Action Plan to tentatively include the following: A. Implementation Strategy B. Priorities C. Public Sector Responsibilities D. Private Sector Responsibilities E. Implementation Steps and Schedule Task 3 .3 : Downtown Improvement Study Committee Meeting Review draft Specific Plan and Implementation Plan with the Study Committee. Task 3 .4: Property . Owners/Merchants Meeting Assist the Study Committee in reviewing the draft plans with property owners and merchants . Task 3 .5: Specific Plan Revise the Draft Specific Plan as necessary and print for public review and approval. Task 3 .6 : Implementation Plan Revise the Draft Implementation Plan as necessary and print for public review and approval. Task 3 .7 : Planning Commission Public Hearing Task 3 .8: City Council Public Hearing and Plan Adoption. Task 3.9: Final Documentation Prepare one black and white camera-ready copy of the final Specific Plan and Implementation Plan. WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9413 3 Task 3 .10 : Study Committee Meetings Attend regularly scheduled meetings of the Downtown Improvement Study Committee during the course of the Phase 3 work. Meetings not noted above are estimated to be three (3) . i WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 PHASE 1 ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION' PHASE 2: DOWNTOWN PLAN, PHA_ HASE 3: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.1 - 12 E�G►.GICR SITE R�/IE1h! ANaI.Y'S15 ALT �REUM. t�LIM. rk"VE L. F11�U I MPI.EME'NT I MPLEMEN'T; I M M MpaP7 MTZrr? Iii, PL1�N PRoPI OJMER t oM. R1sLIG f'' PN PLA C PICLL.IM� MEF HAN CW N HEA-WNG re IM ANN./ FU5 IC �INPL PREI.I � Cf'fIcNS� OT1} tv'fN• MLirTINGS PL..dN FIG NtEGS► 5�I IG �+EA NG �� ® SURvfrY E JOI T Jot . G. S ION RIO►•1 HE.&KINCG NG �XI`Jf CONd DErrT' - SL el-e SURvEY IEv�1 D.IS.C.MEETINGS PLANNING COMP,IISSION MEETINGS CITY COUNCIL M ETINGS- Products: I.MA►25ET O-/ERvIEW I.PRELLIM, Wwr4lbwtj PL_&N i. SPE--1 PIC PLmt 2.SuRvSY+S 2,PZEUM, IMPLlMENTATION PL&N 2.IMF'ILat4TA•TI0 N PLAN 3.PRELIM. I°fUES,opTlorl�j 3,IZECU'i iMENG(;D G27vvNTaNN f'I.AN 3. pIN?LL'�GUMEN'tS A14P p-NNS REroRT 4•ALT, cEvet.41`� STRAT"EGi es MEMO Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons, Inc' 'DUBLIN DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS PLAN DUBUN,CALIFORNIA DUBLIN DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN Dublin, California November 4 , 1985 WBE BUDGET ESTIMATE SUMMARY* Personnel Expenses Total PHASE 1 : ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION $21 ,500 $3,000 $24 ,500 PHASE 2: DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN 19 ,500 3 ,000 22 ,500 PHASE 3 : IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15 .000 3 .000 18 .000 TOTALS: $56 ,000 $9 ,000 $65 ,000 *Budget estimates DO NOT include amounts for economic and transportation consultants . WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 941 3 3 DUBLIN DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN Dublin, California November 4, 1985 WBE BUDGET ESTIMATE PHASE 1: ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION Task 1.1: Background Review $ 800 Task 1 .2: Base Maps 500 Task 1.3 : Preliminary Background Meetings 400 Task 1.4 : Existing Condition Surveys 800 Task 1.5 : Initial Study Committee Meeting 600 Task 1 .6 : Site Analysis 11000 Task 1.7 : Select Interviews 2 ,000 Task 1 . 8: B.A.R.T. Meeting 500 Task 1.9 : Property Owner/Merchant Survey E* Task 1 .10 : Resident Survey E* Task 1.11: Market Overview E* Task 1 .12: Select Property Owner/Merchant Interviews 1 ,500 Task 1 .13 : Development Parameters Identification 500 Task 1 .14: Development Issues/Options/Plans 4 ,000 Task 1.15 : Alternative Implementation Strategies 2 ,000 Task 1 .16 : Property Owner/Merchant Meeting 600 Task 1.17 : Public Presentation 1 ,500 Task 1 .18 : Additional Presentations 1 ,200 Task 1 .19 : Joint Work Session 2 ,000 Task 1.20 : STudy Committee Meetings 1 .600 PHASE 1 PERSONNEL TOTAL: $21,500 EXPENSES ESTIMATE: 3 .000 PHASE 1 TOTAL: $24,500** E* Tasks to be carried -out by the economics and marketing consultant under separate contract. ** Phase 1 total DOES NOT include work of the economic or transportation consultants . WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9413 3 PHASE 2: DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLAN Task 2 .1: Downtown Improvement Study Committee Meeting $ 600 Task 2.2: Preliminary Downtown Plan 7 ,500* Task 2.3 : Preliminary Implementation Strategy 2 ,000 Task 2.4: Downtown Improvement Study Committee Work Session 600 Task 2.5: Property Owners/Merchant 's Meeting 600 Task 2.6 : Joint Work Session 11000 Task 2.7 : Recommended Downtown Plan 5,000 Task 2.8: Planning Commission Public Hearing 600 Task 2.9 : City Council Public Hearing 600 Task 2.10 : Study Committee Meetings 11000 PHASE 2 PERSONNEL TOTAL: $19 ,500 EXPENSES ESTIMATE: 3 ,000 PHASE 2 TOTAL: $22,500** * Includes environmental assessment by Environmental Impact Planning, Inc. ** Phase 1 total DOES NOT include work of the economic or transportation consultants . WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9413 3 PHASE 3: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 3 .1: Preliminary Specific Plan $ 2,500 Task 3 .2 : Preliminary Implementation Plan 2 ,500 Task 3 .3 : Downtown Improvement Study Committee Meeting 600 Task 3 .4: Property Owners/Merchants Meeting 600 Task 3 .5: Specific Plan 2 ,500 Task 3.6 : Implementation Plan 2,500 Task 3 .7 : Planning Commission Public Hearing 800 Task 3. 8: City Council Public Hearing and Plan Adoption 800 Task 3 .9 : Final Documentation 1,000 Task 3 .10 : Study Committee Meetings 1 .200 PHASE 3 PERSONNEL TOTAL: $15 ,000 EXPENSES ESTIMATE: 3 .000 PHASE 2 TOTAL: $18,000 WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 LARRY L. CANNON, AIA, AICP Principal Executive Vice President Mr. Cannon has been responsible for many of the firm's urban design and land-use planning projects in both the United States and abroad. He has had extensive ,experience in assembling and managing multi-disciplinary teams to create innovative and realistic development programs and urban designs. This work has ranged in scale from street beautification and commercial district . revitalization to major urban redevelopment projects . EDUCATION• Bachelor of Architecture, University of Illinois - Highest Honors - American Institute of Architects ' School Medal - Department of Architecture Honor Award Master of Architecture, University of Illinois - Inaugural recipient of the Edward Probst Fellowship EXPERIENCE• Managing Director of the WBE Saigon, Vietnam field office: 1971-1972 Consulting Redevelopment Architect - City of Pleasant Hill, California 1975 - Consulting Redevelopment Architect - City of Pasadena, California 1975 Principal-in-Charge for the following projects: Bunker Hill Redevelopment Plan - Los Angeles , California Irvine Performing Arts Theater - Irvine, California South Shore Redevelopment Plan - Miami Beach, Florida West Colorado Boulevard Revitalization Plan - Pasadena, California. Forty-first Street Revitalization Plan - Miami Beach, Florida Hoboken Waterfront Plan - Hoboken, New Jersey The Woodlands New Town Central Spine - The Woodlands, Texas Lake Oswego Central Business District Plan - Lake Oswego, Oregon North End Redevelopment Strategy Plan - Michigan City, Indiana ` Plaza Espana - Managua, Nicaragua Tai Mui Sha New Town - The People 's Republic of China OTHER: American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association American Institute of Architects San Francisco Chapter Board of Directors . San Francisco Chapter Secretary California Council Board of Directors National Council of Architectural Registrations Boards Certification Urban Land Institute (Sustaining Member) San Francisco Art Commission (Former Commissioner) San Francisco Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board (Former Member) San Francisco Parapet Preservation Task Force (Former Chairman) Foundation for San Francisco 's Architectural Heritage (Member) National Trust for Historic Preservation (Member) California Historical Society (Member) San Francisco Ballet Association (Member) EXPERIENCE PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. (WBE) Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons has a long-established reputation for sensitivity and excellence in planning and architectural design. Recent planning projects of the office have ranged from downtown revitalization plans to the preparation of detailed plans for specific downtown projects . The work of the office, whether architecture or planning, emphasizes simple and direct solutions achieved through a close working relationship with the client and committed to the improvement of the human environment . WBE's background includes revitalization 'and redevelopment planning as well as the planning and design of mixed-u§e complexes. The firm' s design for Ghirardelli Square demonstrates their capability to sensitively combine existing and new buildings with landscaping to create an environment which is both economically viable and pleasing to a wide spectrum of people. WBE projects of relevance to Downtown Dublin include the following: Danville Downtown Master Plan - Danville , CA Preparation of a Master Plan and Action .Program to guide private and public investment within the commercial area of the City. Focused around an "Old Town" area with significant scale and Charm, the downtown is faced with increasing land costs and development pressures - pressures which, unless controlled, could double the intensity of downtown development and destroy its special character. Phase 1 work has been completed. It consisted of a problem analysis and a workbook which identified the major issues and options in the areas of circulation, parking, civic focus, Charlotte Wood (a 10-acre site available for development) , land use and urban design. Utilizing the issues and options,, three alternative master plan concepts were prepared to describe different end goals and the degree of public action necessary to achieve them. A general direction has been confirmed and further testing of a master plan is proceeding. WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 941 3 3 Pleasant Hill Core Area Redevelopment Plan - Pleasant Hill, CA. This master plan for 100 acres comprising the Pleasant Hill Core Area Redevelopment was conceived to provide a suburban community of 30 ,000 people with a wide range of goods and services and to provide the residents with a unique focus of activity consistent with their community self-image. The project was established under the California State Redevelopment Law and was 'planned by WBE in. consultation with the city's Redevelopment Agency (City Council) ,_ Planning Commission, Architectural Review Commission and Citizens ' Advisory Committee in a series of public meetings . Working with the community, WBE developed economic feasibility for a combination of mixed-use facilities. The purpose was to allow the community to select those facilities which would fit the image they required, provide a desirable economic base for the project and attract private developers. Creation of a community focus resulted in a unique blend of facilities for the center -- housing was introduced into a compatible relationship with normal downtown commercial facilities, public offices and facilities (a new town hall) and public recreation areas. The effect has been to create a "living" downtown center . Buildings and spaces within the center turn inward to pedestrian-oriented activities which will culminate in a man-made lake and central park . The redevelopment implementation process is well underway,and WBE is providing detailed public - improvement designs as well as ongoing consultation to assist the Agency in its review and evaluation of all proposed developments. Lake Oswego Central Business District Study - Lake Oswego, Oregon Development of a downtown revitalization program, including a lakefront park , new city hall , shopping, offices and housing. While a split vote in the City Council over the issue of tax increment financing has led to a postponement of redevelopment plan adoption, major steps have been taken to implement the plan developed in collaboration with the Citizens ' Project Advisory Committee. Plans for an expansion to the public library have been adopted, a new City Hall is under construction, and plans are progressing for a mixed-use commercial and residential project downtown. Downtown Corvallis - Corvallis, Oregon Master plan for a 50-block redevelopment area for a riverfront community to include a new major retail center , office complex, parking structures , the rehabilitation and revitalization of Victorian neighborhoods and a riverfront park development . WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 - Corvallis is a university town. Previously a riverfront settlement, its waterfront was neglected despite its potential for park usage and many of its historic buildings were intact but under-utilized. Commercial development in outlying districts was undermining the economic viability of the downtown area. WBE analyzed these problems and potentials, starting with economic and traffic studies . Working closely with a Downtown Commission and several citizen and business groups , the team prepared a comprehensive redevelopment action plan. p Throughout all phases of this project, there was considerable community input. This was used to establish initial goals and design criteria. Design alternatives were presented to the community for its approval. Agreements on rerouting of heavy downtown traffic and development of a riverfront park were generated through public discussion in the design phase. This insured community acceptance and implementation of the final plan. In addition to an urban design plan, including street improvements, landscaping and open space, WBE has helped develop an overall theme or character for downtown Corvallis . This is being implemented with a set of guidelines and an architectural/development review board. West Colorado Boulevard Revitalization Plan - Pasadena, CA Development of an action plan for the revitalization of eight square blocks of downtown Pasadena, centering on the main shopping street of the city. The plan involved the integration of physical designs with market and economic studies to provide a realistic program for immediate implementation. Extensive cost estimates were prepared and a phased program developed to allocate costs to both the public and private sectors. Building rehabilitation studies with cost estimates were also carried out to assist the private sector in property improvements in support of the revitalization effort. Emphasis of the physical plan was on the provision of convenient parking, rehabilitation of existing structures with the selective addition of new construction, development of off-street courtyards and pedestrian areas, improvement of the pedestrian environment along the main street , extension of major landscaped corridors off of the street to make linkages to other nearby areas and improvement of individual storefronts. Results of these efforts to date, along with additional WBE work in downtown Pasadena have resulted in the following: 1. Substantial rehabilitation of existing structures in the study area. - WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9413 3 2 . Opening of a dinner-playhouse in a remodeled structure. 3 . Implementation of a street tree planting program along a 2-mile length of Colorado Boulevard according to plans and specifications prepared by WBE. _ . 4 . Development of one block to improve parking and provide a mid-block plaza with landscaping. 5 . Commencement of action to establish _a special parking district within the study area. Forty First Street Revitalization - Miami Beach. Florida WBE prepared an extensive physical analysis and urban design plan for Miami Beach's main entry street . Stretching from Biscayne Bay on the west to the Atlantic Ocean on the east , Forty First Street contains many fine shops but i5 visually ugly and fails to capture its reasonable share of the resident and tourist retail trade. A visual analysis, a building and use analysis and a traffic and parking analysis were made and alternative conceptual plans were prepared and reviewed with members of an owners and merchants association. Based upon that review, WBE prepared a schematic urban design plan for the one-mile long street , incorporating existing potentials of specific areas while establishing an overall visual continuity. Other drawings and calculations were presented to indicate landscaping, paving, street furniture , new structures and uses , vehicular and pedestrian circulation, parking, open spaces and special design features at the ends and along the street . Sections and perspective sketches were drawn to establish an overall design image, cost estimates were made for public sector improvements , phasing alternatives were developed and implementation organization options were suggested. A more detailed study was made of a three-block Phase 1 area. The study included detailed design proposals for all public sector improvements and for each structure fronting on the street. Proposed private sector changes included new storefronts, creative graphics and signing, color and external extensions of interior uses . Detailed cost estimates were prepared for both public and private sector improvements, and preliminary cost allocations were made to each property along with debt financing calculations. Having received enthusiastic support from owners and merchants along the street and from the Miami Beach City Council, the Forty-First Street Association has implemented Phase 1. This included new specialty street furniture, street lighting, landscaping, new paving materials , graphics and signage. - WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 North End Redevelopment - Michigan City, Indiana Redevelopment concept and implementation strategy plan for approximately 1,000 acres of downtown and adjacent areas near Lake Michigan. The plan focuses on revitalization activities by capitalizing upon the area's unique recreational boating assets and natural attractions . The plan identifies and analyzes specific redevelopment project opportunities and establishes a strategy for implementation. These projects include a wide range of retail, office, hotel , residential, recreational and public parks. Concurrent analyses included developing a major Recreational Boating Plan, site and development potential analysis for . approximately 7 miles of National Lakeshore Transit and Information Center . Pasadena Downtown Master Plan - Pasadena , CA Development of design for the beautification of Colorado Blvd. to be implemented in conjunction with the construction of the proposed downtown Retail Center . Work included landscape plans , street furniture design, paving, street lighting and public signing. In support of this work , WBE. carried out a detailed Engineering Cost Study to delineate alternatives posed by traffic needs , street drainage, current street profiles and phasing. WBE prepared schematic design plans for a Civic Center Mall in front of the City Hall and plans for an adjacent street connecting the City Hall with Colorado Boulevard and the proposed Retail Center . Detailed drawings were then prepared and coordinated with the Public Works. Department and the developers of the Retail Center . Construction is now underway. Other master planning work as well as design review is being carried out in the downtown area. Southern Pacific Railroad Corridor Specific Plan - Sunnyvale, CA Specific. plan for nine properties covering 85 acres bordering the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way adjacent to downtown Sunnyvale. Formerly occupied in the most part by canneries which have moved away from this urban location, the area was studied from an economic and physical standpoint to determine the best mix of uses for the properties. Following a substantial public review process, specific plans. incorporating industrial, office and residential uses were prepared for each of the nine sites . WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94133 Oak Park Redevelopment Plan - Sacramento, California Preparation of a redevelopment plan a low income, minority neighborhood near Sacramento's Old State Fairground. While the area lacked market potential for significant new development, community workshops revealed that it was perceived as a good place to live and that a large amount of available monies were being spent outside the neighborhood. The plan which included a detailed Operations Action Manual focused on several key efforts: 1) upgrading the neighborhood' s image to developers and the rest of the community, 2) reinforcement of existing commercial areas to create a neighborhood shopping area and 3) development of two market rate residential complexes through public-private partnerships. During the course of the work , WBE and the consultant team worked closely with the Project Area Committee. WBE also organized and ran one of the best attended and most successful community workshops ever held in the neighborhood. Key West Harbortown - Key West , Florida Redevelopment Master Plan for 165-acre Naval Base being declared surplus through the GSA. The site, located adjacent to the heart of downtown, contains over 20 historically significant structures, including the Truman White House. The plan emphasizes the retention and adaptive reuse of these historic buildings and the project 's complete integration into the surrounding residential and commercial district. The plan is a mixgd-use development of retail, offices , hotels, tourist facilities, a full range of housing types , light industrial uses , public parks, a 600-boat marina, county governmental offices , and a major downtown parking resource . Ghirardelli Square - San Francisco, California The Square is a retail and entertainment complex converted from an old chocolate factory and represents the first major effort in the United States to blend new construction with rehabilitation of existing structures . Over 10 ,000 people come to Ghirardelli Square each day during the tourist season. The project has received over 14 awards for design excellence and economic success. A quote from the National American Institute of Architects is typical: " . . .their (WBE) professional abilities transform historic Ghirardelli Square from a largely neglected old chocolate factory and landmark into one of the liveliest neighborhoods of San Francisco and the nation. . . . " WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 941 3 3 Building Rehabilitation Study for Greater San Francisco Chamber of Commerce . San Francisco, California Six, carefully selected, obsolete industrial buildings were studied in detail to determine potential new use and cost of rehabilitation as office, retail , etc. Virtually all have since been privately redeveloped. A further Neighborhood Rehabilitation Study was made of an eight-block area adjacent to one of the above buildings . Housing WBE has designed and seen constructed over 20 ,000 residential units. These have included single family units , town houses, garden apartments and high rise condos and mixed use projects . WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. • 40 GOLD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 941 3 3 l ' PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN PROJECTS t y Y ,,r y r � "•' a T s �\ � 11 � 'f 1 'y�+}�y � � i,,•,'+'Lrx�a1 "`" ttn.."na n :ter.. rt 5 y t.'..h. -`, \ 11 ,�,.}1; � �j` tr\�. { �`',c'a. < sc " .a 4 f�r ��Y•�P -� y-.{ t � •, z � M'.�+ ® t1 -- /✓� �' s � .t•..� 'St>t f r� \ y L7 0 F 1 ¢ \ ��� y w yt s . s 4 `y rtj .r y E t F. � ,ti-. .+ (tt•'� z� `- �. - t .X r a t 1 ' �' :tit y n,,,, s �. ° V -r F ;s •L.7..a `air^r r. 1 ,.. ❑� ! . of /� a x.� . a.c'e.X��}�` `'al 7 ""� ar ar It .t '�� 1A i ys r { r ' Sv• .r .' .• '/ { '� `rr y �,� hr+ 7 3'`t nt•.7 `y��t � K •�� g .x,s at r r r ttl � ; i 3�Z �� xf� 4i +'�S�v .' t .� o f S k } N i t 'r `,w .- t t y1, TAI MU1 SHA \ tt�� a �� >t, ry six , �,Y DEVELOPMENT PLAN ` t .. \ \.•` The x " rs C cd.� e's Republic \ t tix ti,. t wy - x h r \ of China a'`~. 7 ✓ yx�'�t"' ty i+* u 7 t' t t i.,,�s ..n �•�� i u.� v \ �*.4.- �. a -> �4 T'r' },F a c r• -3 7 F't t ta�.r`b.�x � t a New community for 5U \ J , , 'f {��{ #�c �;a,x ' sm a t 'u 3� t,. , rr �fa .r�tiy ae��~- � yt) h: Sft'�h �a+s�1 t ?'� "y y t -Q. r""tt '.z. -S 7�.,.ra p.✓["- .,�t'Yr'f'F:n. 't.d r j� 'C F -�i+�`'.T�, it } Y r b 000 residents 'and tourists in Southern China. 'Ate _ n7 7,'Y x.,tt `' t ,'u` 1'. a 7 ✓*i 'i v - za+r 'f t y ` + L� �! - 5 �ii t s M �'�.{+. �u•$d b ,{,e �.t i t tp i'3 � ir" '.r.,i7. +z fE t J jtiw k s y �m �.1` s - �'' - ��' ,� .n kt�'�' '" � t a > y �, a yb� �2 Y 'n1+ {S i.a�'rna � !✓S; y r {�L �,`Y. � 4,� � - 4 �7� YY.�'t+^r rrt§,t,.,r,at�7 �i .r"�`5'�VAS 3 Y.;'•.,„i'�r.n�` d a �"�a.:�Rf'^3ra •>.. ,'�r�3, 't,_n�`�� -dd�t°°'' �` �Y'ib`,-5� �,y •t`r '�° ',�`c�� � �.. +� wT r.i. Q n� ar! sr' -,^ r ai sa, ..d .K, a, 4 i 7, - 1p 1a n n �S f, J ; t, grs.:`�v �. .a S�i�:�.� {},rf i "F x� rr"'t jd„ ,:2.r R.� '+ r `,�,"(`{ 3(.. .'4°11;7 n .f. +C'i1 I L �``'}'�k t 's+ i:•1 ..� .:v a �`2 ••st s r1 '}„' v'tad x,f+3 r ,�..;t.+ s ,`s;- - �` s -• 3 s'" <rt'tt u.„ .�r:.,ij 'y? t .c* >a ><.°Y':e"'r'i tr ,A '; a`tsn t'tx •iat� +.3r`:r.aC' f:. F ? t.�t;,, '(` •5 4ta,?W .1i a r ..r e f.�r a7 i',� ys.�r��L�,.ya�"f.."icPi�y,JiF.2 s�'�d-',,r � � �4 x� 55 yf o�. ,r r�ti 5.4w' 1k. S y.,:: y _E.: y 'T e>}."'� - r t 2 •Lt+ r�'\re t ,J��, a� S i. fv"3 7 h et. <+,� s�k�`Ltr i.,t�'��� � ° .I-7�. '` - •1.. t4 i '\T{ -�;1'3" • 3 R l'it}J J'tS� o. F ,ras. +.,, if.: , ? '`>,Jiy ..Ea'`-r?n'�r'�3 ..,{ .,r t•:Y.,r �wt't.3.._ iy�tyr, ;�..z# dj3 / r. r.r,-� Y y y��7vL .ili q3ty t T 5^ F f utr.. fi.,`" + KN"'.w-G" '+1-r4 ,Frl.... r +:.•tis.' ��3.. •�. a;3'4.��9(, . ap :„ r.A x r✓r c ' � 4 �,r f ltrv..,. .rI2�tF, •. y +fin;.- �...°aid r s.sy Sr _ �?g� 1 dwwx,Ir t a'*�'z:+t. a w.�t t 2 w<r'� '"r,.b° p4>«�n''r 3 t~rx'>��' ta T.•�,f^�t��z lr�.rr�,r., �:t .«,m �r,��r5�`T ':'`,n' ` (475) 397—a54 4 ;Q' ' 41 40 GOLD STREET .K CALIFORNIA 9413 ,, .�'7. 3• .�. rr b�-. •-9 ��t x.�K,`•ga�t�vr' f .n,� 'Sf�.w�'4�i s*k... * � y � �$`'..' � .: s' <vfi t.,,7 4 x. { . . ��'t'��' Ys:y ct�� w'l':..Y�t �f��� �`4t'�,y`yi4P����rku,;� �� r, 'd'' v� � �,a j` v�"�d c � ��`��r��4•t 3e•a.-ti� �w,�?�",..�..us. .'5:.1�w..ri;.i4ri.�,ae,�...�..,t.n�. ...,.:e3� P17.r..a.t3.l .L.�.',..� t,3,_,'k£is�'' �r.... .�'....ti.� ,::�%is�se,.,e.�.:.Td .�'k�c..`..!,�!e lxru.'-. �t�..�:s-.,.,�"i.x N w f I N, t�111'11.11, "t-WU RSTEW"'SE RNARDI�,AND�, V4 1;11 'ba'&grbund-has 6h&d'fr6 WBE's Pldhhib ri,addition-6 th6i r'standafd'arch tteciura I Services, 9 master p ans c e Prvate-c ients to* eve I opment and h e, wng plannng services o e: ',, both the:pbblicand private sectoes­-;­,�.-, 'plans for,'`the�1.6xpafisibri,,.6f,a,major,,-�'r., institutional R 5. i 'city, work asInc udL apit'a'11 Jn A'sia.� ecent, h' " I �d"6(_ r,�Site'A -reaevejopmeiit ,a'nd-.i-,,- ;­4, 1�n s i ve�':experience i in the' 1I r.,Pla n -revitalization of R e opmen t Pl anning.,,,�.­, d-eve I ' - -'- "' ' ` `'' ­ - Revitalization Planning ` smaller;As VgUs work has dve rt h eyeariJ66AiDesgn , shgle-puroosi..bUilding'groups,such, as, the ,9�, 11:G hT Sci Oa r6-�ijh_.-Saii- orf,PIS6,- 'n high*l'y'-su"c"c'essft' iardelli C 10 -.,..,.,,,De`sign. ontro s-Deve pment :z- 'cisco to larg'eir`rirojecis,`;the'-firm has emphasize a �.-r',�Desigin"-Review scale total" str6n -!�6s6`of;human �'l` an attention t( environmental design" w i i i h'a ra*mework fo,r: Vh—e- r-e* "a p, r-opW :�--- assemble e , with "the " t esubstantial-functi6nal, fnancial an d im ­ C ienrs',�oprova,.ra -MUti-discipinay team of'f plementation problems pose a� the larger multi s pecia lists to assist, n"a ddressing the 'uni q"u 6 re use S me��is each p'la'nn'ing problem 4 ce T J., 1 71 Iq <4 nt 01 -21 so, r at "4L .47 Y. a*Pon Ot KEY.WEST..'HARBOR'`,'' ."4:"' Key e es ?�Florida.- ';C W 0. Master development plan k for a 165-acre Navy Sub- marine Base created sur- plus t rough GSA. The plan provides a mixed-use 7! i development of retail, 7.,7 housing of all economic ranges hotels, tourist facilities, public parks, EATM cruise boat docks and a 600-boat marina. Emphasis has been placed upon the retention of historic struc- 7 tures, including the Tru- man White House,and the v­:A, complete integration of the area with the adjacent resi- dential and busineSs WX, istricts. F-F- T s^u 7'in t�rK r,t4 F'x4`.... '. -r.-�t r yw••g—+at x ��'�r rd x m a x `r' �•T: y rcrrr z••� `.�'{-T'-' r? „ z"d,`�'rc zTTa;~+ '� •s l r �.. t: tf ty,7 I Yp. I{ r� {t .. •'�* tSK jR ,*•'fi,?x �:, - , � 1 ?' � ,i f 't r.'r+C >t r; ,1.. qF1 �, yS p ��t ti zY'�t,• 5�-�xk<'Tt, � R°$E�"}F''� �2 sr.Y •�t�*,{.✓"''�' r 'Yd ,+ m .f`r :sr 0 ,rte ✓ z r•x vy �*r'` S'+p 's '� 4'T •h,y..1M`7'.`v4S ,',` < K- Y '�•r� ,k�ai" •a>ff.4,'�' iA �:rryr, "�s �,� w.'1 +£'a?' '+rt+fm r- 1 s i h .:i.•..r a s,•1�'iL. S y�' a h ,}* .,t...� ra?{ �i't,; r, i''76 pv:? FM1'i;`we+' SF 'Sd'•,.,F•p'4,s i r„G.,1 fi > �' 4 4wxfrt `;5�y nt S yr ai"� •z 'a '` �k`�' ,�, � � .. •,o��,.. Q ``ddrrY e- -1. i..»A +. + t 'x ? q'i" "C 3"'hatt4, 9�a kr �� d�,1�,�.��.Y 'S+.�a�i•1tF. J-�,r,+� ��ata O �+t't�-i HZ.yrl �,�r �s t � �},q; ket+Y s+}+ r�, ••�f�...x�. .;Y•.�.., S� �a ���.+++k ro t.'i 5F'R'<"� �r,�K1„�,r c'rnx �5.�,� u� j-4.i3rf �3�•"�y a ��• •4• A ': i e� �� ¢ "`''' �C },J��,,'t-�5,� {•pt�,,,,w S�.�t Vy. { 5r `� ),,, 4�ti. Y��'.• ' .�:.:' :.OAS's _:�.• � � 4�-�.. f,�fy.,�{ 1't '�'^ r yY' �.{` J.�` t '�a -� - e • �A*?' ,Ry'r!; �s. 6^, �F�yr� �r'+AJJY t�� �_} t • ••. � y N`L :`'�p�y��r�S ,yam:r7;:f ��.n ,t "� :`"4' a�� �����7���t'ttlFs ` fix'��• `�?j� r'I SOULTH SHORE-`;- , Miami�B ch;Florida A nasterz development plan for the � �\ � o,� �g Kr -tCU,+`�,.Y•, ^sue �>,, "`s•r ♦ . W t^� ,� ° ” °''' 'r southern ti of Miami Beach Im le •,� ua menta't on Will create a water onented •. _ k s 'environment by a"system of new4inter s � �.�rt �;nal.canals :,u. dS 1 e•-xi? �} `'l1? r r `*r'e�✓j x>'��',-���*a•Grt`y'�^.Y�r� -�. .I�;t i�a s ,s s provides for.4,350 .hotel y lo• eta '� rooins, �2;500 'residential units,-yin P cludmg`1relocation thousing Y 450 000 i �f•' d Y t_�5tx 7a+T i-?A [.. p square feet of specialty shops, 65,000 1 uare feet"of offices, recreation and ru : entertainment'islands 'a�.manna 12,000 parking spaces,and a variety of ' r S. transportation.types, mcluding water .�# taxis,'people movers and buses kt f The plan,prepared under WBE's man- _ e y agement,.`utilized 'professionals"in ur- -p�—' ban design, economics, market analy- f sis,environmental im act assessment, ' transportatioi, architecture; land- _ x r scape'architecture, relocation,'rede velopment implementation and feder- al funding`assistance 5, ' L �f • . plEllllUAl�llll�ll����®���QL��Iw�Ai111 � :_.. :- «� =" , pill I�IIUA������llee (Lsk , -,{ 7i �+ � � ti -� � r - s�.•-, >r. :t�> a tin- ` � 41ST STREET REVITALIZATION Florida`�n4�I F `- { -`., I t 1 y,. •2 ,i VF. g.. L � Yr w u •- ti t� � fib f, friUrban design=and revrtahzationw plan ,• ,Tf i�+y K, i for-Miami'Be'ach s`mam',ent. -Street. ; 'g :.,t-:;,,; 3:2-,.tt :� .«l.�r`'•K f '1. f '7 0� � w aaan�w:an°vwrr Y °< < 4 t__I m FALLS LANDING O�n Jeffersonville-Clarksville, Indiana 8t ST Redevelopment plan for 100 acres directly across the Ohio River from downtown �, Louisville, Kentucky. 0 51h ST. m Plans include an amusement and education '°° '°° 01 \�,EL , center, a 150-roo hotel expansion, 125 maw ❑ �' = r�s"' residential condominiums, and a 150,000 <4 �•°``,', square foot adaptive reuse of the old Railroad Car Works into a specialty shopping + 4 and entertainment.center. CENTER ■a ""' � :- ��' ' When completed, the project will offer the only major stretch of landscaped Y public P 1 P 4 riverfront in the Louisville area, and a major attraction for both metropolitan area residents and the many tourists who visit Louisville each year. r ' Project responsibilities of the multi= , � °��, AIR � � - �a.Dt-i:,• disciplinary planning team included project promotion and the securing of a qualified e � .ry v w ,,",y,;' a development entity. i a iy � ^h fy Yr 4AV A �" f aSr �T a 4e 7^ ' f�q F: \` �• ' "C 'w b;Ti �i(r +ten l'+� ;�:+. `+F�y,'S, ��7•�-.A ; .?`. t G/.�xa:. '7 ,ry�'rf��t, ti r • x -;t'11r�+'X�zY..7�",,,�, �A •.�, +.1v 9 ° F v ..�'.f1 wp�'' %';�';�+ t .4,h�, y fir' u. +:"w—; -•�... ,� '�.t��x,.: - ✓��.�, 3y �;:•, � � S k;. .w''�'*..r,j �. � .�# '��`,�..;�"'t�{fit : wr' a vi ��y �:.�,z" �,L �t �} ?"� w � Sys,,,,, .�•� >~`„�a!+t.;. r�Y� xr�h;� «+r` i �. at. .a,.X : ��� t � •?'i'xx'grYR�> .+,�-'q�r,�,�;-Nr4. .;t �x ''x �'y�.» ;, � '�,•` � Y :.E #,:g: a� t��`eYr. t+;s-�'_+.�y �,r,,,�t"��„,yd,�f�:�,�...� ��•"t x7+ `.r. "�i..'f.�,�<p+,T�z...r!�,�,,.:a.i�y�✓�.�y��'�rs�r'".♦4.;5d" t t�-i' er ; 2 3 a•535 :4 tq 2 h i µa " 1 s 9 r * r w h 4, a r. wz s t t r : .w 'r },i Tr .F' 'l ✓A "R,S r`F'r $ �'F',tC"" y.+; i:rt-:• "rte +1k'r*, ?. :.., !6'PT r^. t�ly'.dr yP V'- .. •r`4 _ �r �; r }Y. e �,, '.v+.3} .S P.�� � ,?..LV;i �*��•dt7>,r;.1 �`�.r�gF� "-{{,"f'yi k T'3�' � t,� w`�' rt }� s' �'Q .Jwe��y;' �. .' � 6"''•s =fSrY- '°�� d 3R.r,4r"' e T a. r `T'�d 1 i''h "^`ti c{. k nn. -k.. ,,� r S_ �',64 �. '3-T• fih. i�-•.iir<,ti�,� r � .tYrir•� i y�'R3' ' sfm'�g• .. g ;.•-.. ,rS:' t+2 ,, L f £C�"y7 t.%'°*d'. i '� '7- x y1i`j 'z ert)+> .•.e?�i. +n7 ra z r h� efYV f.. •art r14rX�S�"�+'t .1�r7,�r�+{ •'S„�`.t �-1 a12c�. ^�it�- L�•�r ���.' d�, �� �t�"a,.,,t„ :,`a Lr' �. `. � «,n� ' t��tlWvr ��,.p.•L: _ ','��,zs�,��,;a{: t ✓�?"���m �� �'-":�' 3 �J�.r.r-'^�^p:;,�..�r •za�'•...�* >':. *r`-i�' �`}�'�rht�a«a+� '�i' �arti'�q��, /'.. �k "�'- "'i+f.° &��'•';.fZ � a �' 'E,..�,„sc � T�.,.,�"v,�'� +� '^ �� '�`` �.i!'�+�,c:$-• f.�+.g.!4 �a*'� s Y r µ..f �"�1 si•i ,fir w• tr c� M1 y ,.ty F titt'r -t "`F.t �' c'$� ��'.t wr•! }.�•ae' �k ..•- � �'-yf -. -,.^• ,, � .•-� ..,-,�7�,. ..� �� r T, r 4 r��r � � ,4."r tv r-zra.tz` ' �� ,t 43�" „�y�r>,}d}' `. •' F .t zK -. � 5��a��r••�-c`� .•LY, ,•�.t,�,g .t�3��,�� s�r��.r���'*����',t� tt� ,,k. ,�a,.n �� }.rr �r��S.'#"'.t '��»�` :s�,�� �''r"" �{o'f �' ��;�t-�+�F•��,.c�t�,,���y,,{t'y` x,�a�"�,of -."# '� �'�' �a`,h�•+s-�' X ' t,• _ 4 •fit v; °t��^fi.4.n�-�' s R •.li+.. ram"' .�, �t"k a - e 6,. � - r" � !'. FA1Ly s 2..4.f•S73Y19C1 ��tt'"2� ,Zih$e;Y fx7trY,y,J ;!. }, s`M�; "'3 A a t "h '.yz7. +�.,«}. : _: sa,YYRS .t•�yi �:�It�t;q.,. _ ^_-,r• z;,••;,C} — F'':.�: 7, !r *fynty..Yp s..}a ..9 Ci�3`�� �,s A's. y✓�`K'n hrJ� ' �v53r: 3.a g. j{-ass- '�•... r .,�.F.p iii+.rA�' 1-7R`:a tip kr_..•'T2 5�1`f5'3 �'d -'r •t t.+ }�}J� 4,.*ty �'+►E!•. - ty'p' A'�* ty FALLS;,LANDINGRIVERFRONT"ANDHOTEL}. Fr• �" '; 'r3�'' $u-�?K''� '" ���x �;r� "' .w:tih v�u^fie. B :. v,x t m.� a ro .•• �i E w. `q3 te�{rc gft; nr w'S .7' ✓ ?� Ag .��ay1fz4rd,>3a�ttn' s y{f>5 +'•:" b/.t., ..K{, +«" tt ",...Yt..:�yac. i«v9P�.,s4'?, .T'.:3 �°�}z. -r',} t5 r1:w.i.: � r�i` , t '"•s^:�=," {r!-r t.r t`"� ^ t r:�,t:+4.<•'' 'Q ."y'� °�^.pk ac i •.��ztr..,`' k_tr a4t-^ ,.al:g` .f+c ;t;.� ;*„y ,�"it�,., t rd "1:, F•,s'c,� ,.y. <� ¢T ate, t ay 3 t `' FOP • 1 r� c s s ._r. ''3 u. y �. ,,r ,.1� ,'-. ,:}"' ',,yi �" t 5' 2' *i,C " ,m' :y`sS•r"�i• >.a;r. 'a1 '-.,..'3.. !h .esYf` t*,.�:•a4 LN,_z..t�c} ,az� .tt8.'v,'i.,- 7 �+`_ �- r w{ rr +- 4 � a b toM C rr SFx nM•'A1�`��,t. ,�+°.ya;•'S�.d t ,qy„,f r�..^{N'�r�'1 : � "•" ii'N"p. ••::?a9�' ?Mf''�y,�7 t t.'jt'isr ti,1 :5 W v t o�f . A.«t'7` .i'4 .''' { �y?a'�i ,�C�,} •(.{61'' z •�x4 y4c v n. `;4' fr.�?'*. tt8`,.' t>, '�' a'.£ f ,R•}'. .: ,'x�.i y &., 0. z.L y;,. ,"r' 4p x t ..v u <„„ c i'. •+•' .�', 1 .S`t':'^r^r 'X'. � F»:y D• �i z ^x?t1 yVY' K , v". °ti'i3• Sf3'++';,-G,v,. 'c` Ct..,3.}'�. k-a� ?sett a..{:.rS�i,SI:-1,=tt;. 'E�t ."�w, .,i'�?�e.:�` x>' 1:.;t: ,{e�v�';�F,:a. r;. ��kv:".;e.�T�, n�� �t1 �,'�'�• �p.�;r,; .w.JvS;7t�r" F '�' `�i ,'�j�'"�o4•c i� vz mrf �•�t .�,�..,to�y�, `� .>V �.?r r5�• � � h� � FY �'� g t r� .� s t ,� .' t.[ .: .ts 4 � ++..r Tx ,7.y7 5 e. SFr k"{� ,y j".z?..fca,. ^� , �k �+ }f' r+ej�`s. tsa„� dq +ai 4 e ,� > a.r�}r ' ,"•s xM ; :`s', r `x �H '.:2•r K f lh. t t y,81 f`jjs bi 4.m� a% 4*. Y.E t •t v t i,yt.'"t.a 4� 's` .:1�a NN,^ ��'9�' 15.#J'l xr J� 4� o ,.�}�„ L �� �'i `•ny,� viz 15 1. fir... ri.'�I y<r"e�, .� Ya+ '` l wx rts r .c• ti � © .TZ 'p"�S y s,,.1' a'ea Sv ra+i,t�' ,My• '� �- i'slt'�.,r„" •.�,r, zx°y„St, i'' S. a ? c Tr drr ^.�+"' di -i7 f 1+4 a t E t , '4a�.��3a•?�i;tai ! w. „+. <Y ,qy .a m.,. s'�r +• li^'su&'"'ity"�',S,} F `, C-, -, 7w'Y ? t -i c >�•'i .2 T'.4.'„�,>�'.. t +:f ��^ +A r r k tq k i > f�tYr ,° �zclr;,.i yk�� titi �i��ri 4 w•fi�,i''>'�' y. _ m °ti:;- .tayit7: '� r,,��,.rP"� �'�k 7 .t k�u�r!'SS nit±a5 ti°�wr ,s�Rr az�> F$6ts+ a A. r >sja rh x� xm y.,. K ri .;`.c `.• 3 f ,�' 7�+, t r•d dRtl r r i X L, v uffiS �r" � ,,� k Er�rr' z ; •�YUEHSIU DEVELOPMENT' T n y r r r �yy'-•..r h k 1 + r xA tiv— o r t.7 ay, -S: rw i.• _ a e 7.: r 4 yl ,`kf,. > 'S>,a'S'a � ;.''+i f�1r Sfytyn k.CS'Sf �`><b ytr`A SS'3 `..3'°kct•'t d w ny-''^ t '�,,,++r�'7�`� ,�`� !a >� � _ � �s�' ° f..�. . S d••d ,, r•'�";+ tN p +r d� ` •'FFri�'r'�t`t.w f�}''!•,r,.r t ��^Lt r Ji l•. N�. b.,.. �l C'I r 4u tTH END LAKE.MICh „ �;s� 4 REDEVELOPMENT '�yur• µ'4 '. k ` 1 -• - Michigan City, Indiana `r� � ,� .,� �� �., „ ° r• `'° " - 40 Redevelopment concept and imple- mentation strategy plan for approx- imately 1,000 acres of downtown and S mot; °� .,�► -a `° adjacent areas near Lake Michigan. The plan focuses revitalization activ- ities by capitalizing upon the area's \ ,� ..,.� , unique recreational boating assets and �; °' o _ natural attractions. Plan identifies and analyzes specific redevelopment proj- e ect opportunities and establishes a strategy for implementation. — �k Analysis included a Recreational Oil �. _ Boating Plan and development pro- 4 :;; ftirrty aa►v"' All _ - gram for a National Lakeshore Transit yq . ,� s ..'. . and Information Center. F-7fi '0 k& Lo ----------- ii//• %i0 '�/ ,I�1 _ _,'\yam\,\, YUEHSIU DEVELOPMENT Guangzhou, China Redevelopment of an 18-acre parcel in the i' City-of Canton to accommodate 3,600 resi- dential units in 19 high-rise buildings along 4 A \ with street level retail shops, light industrial ;2zYR. space, a primary school and a performing arts theater. 1� 'I \ SITE PLAN m m EX3 WATH m �\ / iWTO COURT V,IIQT" MROFa COURT A _ - TREATER I1.. Ri'IMOU! T OW ,1 i Y �' ��_�� �=� —1�_ wig =-P�Irll_lye_ i d .;1`��-��� t. 'flu� 4-4 411- Al 0j, ��►��PErS Flew A—�mm rs OR—610 P—Mm oil Qtr ...... N WT WW3 a it ,On V/I;Wl Wl 0 it; Al2M, �pl'-�"l"°'„"mss ' ';�-- �l�l����Nlb`,:;�/� III I I I E 114-A-M" '62 , I 1 \ I • • • • \ \ `,�yi., \ I%�!I��\ � %? ��� ` \ •�` •. 111. • ••. • •• .• :zz iloo k Z-11 AO mg=TWe 00 gg 4 53: AAA Aw ca 121 Nil IES gi' n 1 I ' r r i THE WOODLANDS ---- -- Houston, Texas I I � 1 Master development plan for 17.6-acre office parcel within The Woodlands New Town north of Houston. The Ian included analysis of site develo _ �. _ ent influences, parking alternatives, massing options, phasing and site de- velopment costs. Sited within a heavily wooded forest the concept emphasizes the creation y �* of an internal urban spine of plazas,ar- -� cades, landscaping and water ele- ments with respect to which all ' buildings are sited. n i OTHER PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN PROJECTS GHIRARDELLI SQUARE BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM San Francisco,California San Francisco Bay Area World famous commercial adaptive-reuse complex. Consulting architects for station design standards and aerial support system. GOLDEN GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT CAL EXPO San-Francisco,California Sacramento,California Mixed-use complex with upper level pedestrian circulation network extending Master development plan for California State Fairgrounds. over 15-bock downtown area. SOUTH INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN THU THIEM PENINSULA DEVELOPMENT Medford,Oregon Saigon,Vietnam Redevelopment strategy for 100-acre site to create cultural;commercial,of- Development plan to extend city by 25%and establish government agency fice,housing and recreation facilities within a park setting. for implementation. LAKE OSWEGO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STUDY PLAZA ESPA&A Lake Oswego,Oregon Managua,Nicaragua Redevelopment plan for downtown area of Portland suburb with a resident Master plan and design vocabulary for mixed-use commercial and residential population of 25,000. development. CONVENTION AND PERFORMING ARTS FEASIBILITY STUDY MONTEREY CUSTOM HOUSE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Salem,Oregon Monterey,California Analysis of market support,alternative sites and development program for a Redevelopment plan adjacent to Monterey's Cannery Row. multi-use complex. i PLEASANT HILL COMMONS MASSPORT DEVELOPMENT PLANS Pleasant Hill,California Boston,Massachusetts Redevelopment plan for creation of 105-acre downtown around a man-made Development plans for waterfront pier sites. lake and park.Continuing consultation on developer plans and architectural design. CHEUNG SHA CORVALLIS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Lantau Island,Hong Kong Corvallis,Oregon Master plan and design for 22-unit residential complex. e Redevelopment plan for 50-block area in community of 40,000 residents. RED HILL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WEST COLORADO BLVD. REVITALIZATION PLAN Hong Kong +. Pasadena,California Master Plan for 400-unit residential complex overlooking Tai Tam Bay. Rehabilitation and revitalization program for eight-square block downtown COLORADO BLVD. BEAUTIFICATION PLAN area. Pasadena,California PASADENA DOWNTOWN DESIGN CONSULTATION Urban design plan for street where Rose Parade is held annually. Pasadena,California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DESIGN CONSULTATION ; Consultation to Redevelopment Agency on design of a shopping center in the Berkeley,California I downtown area. SCHOONMAKER WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT Consultation on long-range planning,facility siting and building design. L Sausalito,California UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Boating-oriented development on Richardson Bay featuring housing,hotels Victoria,British Columbia and commercial uses. Plan for new campus plus continued design consultation on facility siting and design.