HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.1 Approve 11-12-1985 Minutes f -
REGULAR MEETING - November 12, 1985
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of .Dublin was held on
Tuesday, November 12, 1985 in the meeting room of the Dublin Library. The
meeting was called to order at 7: 33 p.m. by Mayor Peter Snyder.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Moffatt, Vonheeder and Mayor
Snyder.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of alleg-
iance to the flag.
PROCLAMATION HONORING VETERANS
Mayor Snyder read a proclamation that was being sent to the Department of
Veterans Affairs in Sacramento.
The proclamation recognized and honored all veterans with special emphasis
placed this year on POW/MIA' s.
VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - EXPANSION PLANS
Mr. Gene Broadman, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Valley Memorial
Hospital requested time to address the Council to provide an overview of the
hospital ' s future plans for service delivery.
City Manager Ambrose reported that the City had received a letter from
Patricia K. Renn, Community Relations Director for Valley Memorial Hospital
indicating that this presentation presented a scheduling conflict. Ms. Renn
indicated that the presentation would be made at the Council meeting on
November 25th.
CLOSED SESSION
At 7: 38 p.m. , the Council recessed to a closed executive session to discuss :
Property Negotiations in accordance with Government Code Section 54956. 8
( Imperial Freeholds Site, Dolan School Site and Fallon School Site) , and
Pending Litigation in accordance with Government Code Section 54956. 9 (a)
(City of Dublin vs. The Sawmill, City of Dublin vs. Alameda County, City of
Dublin vs. Nichandros) .
CM-4-236
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
r
PUBLIC MEETING RECONVENED
At 8: 55 p.m. , the public meeting was reconvened with all Councilmembers
present.
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote, the
Council took the following actions:
Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 28, 1985;
Approved City Treasurer' s Investment Report for Period Ending October 31,
1985;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 124 - 85
ENDORSING THE FAIR RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1986
Approved the hiring of Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons, Inc. , Planning
Consultants to prepare the Dublin Downtown Improvement Plan and authorized
the City Manager to execute the agreement;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 125 - 85
FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS
TRACT 4569
and authorized continuance of a letter of credit in the amount of $172 , 000 in
connection with the guarantee of work performed in Tract 4569;
Authorized an additional appropriation of $40, 000 in Park Dedication Funds to
.supplement the developer ' s contribution toward the development of the Amador
Lakes Mini Park; and requested Gates & Associates to enhance the park design
to include improvements;
Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $342, 562. 66.
Cm. Moffatt requested that due to the large amount of money involved, the
item related to budget modification transfers and appropriations be removed
from the Consent Calendar for discussion and explanation. City Manager
Ambrose reviewed the transfers and appropriations item by item.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the
Council approved 1984-85 budget modification transfers and appropriations;
CM-4-237
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
MTC PROPOSED LEGISLATION
TO AUTHORIZE A COUNTY TRANSPORTATION TAX
The City has received a letter from Commissioner Valance Gill of the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission inviting the City to comment on the
proposed County Transportation Tax legislation which has been drafted by the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission for consideration by the State
Legislature.
The proposed legislation would enable any County in the Bay Area to place
before the voters a measure authorizing additional taxes for transportation.
The draft proposed legislation provides for a transportation sales tax.
However, alternative funding sources including sales tax on motor vehicle
fuel, motor vehicle fuel tax, or a vehicle license fee surcharge are also
being considered by the Commission.. The proposed legislation would also
require the development of a County Transportation expenditure plan which
would be considered as part of any election. The development of this plan
would have to be agreed upon by the County Board of Supervisors, the Mayors '
Conference as well as participation by MTC and transit operators. The plan
would be voted upon by the voters in the County in conjunction with any tax
that was proposed. The plan would specify the projects that are to be funded
by the tax, the amount and duration of the tax, and the designation of either
MTC or the creation of a County Transportation Authority to administer the
tax.
The basic issues were 1 ) Should the City support the proposed legislation in
order to enable voters of Alameda County to vote upon a tax for transit and
highway projects? 2 ) What revenue source should be included in the draft
legislation? 3 ) Should MTC be chosen to administer the proceeds of the tax or
should a new County Transportation Authority be created to administer the
tax?
Cm. Jeffery stated that the Alameda County Transportation Commission is
currently studing what options may be available and felt that MTC may be
pushing this too quickly. Cm. Jeffery felt that since people in the Valley
got burned on BART, we should proceed very cautiously before getting into
something like this.
Cm. Vonheeder expressed concern that the majority of the funds would be used
to improve Highway 17, and that very little would be used in this Valley.
Cm. Jeffery felt the City should not take a position at this time, but rather
answer in terms that we would like further information and that we are
studying other issues, and also express concern about past actions. Council
concurred with this response and directed Staff to forward their comments to
MTC.
PUBLIC HEARING
CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE ORDINANCE
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
CM-4-238
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
At its meeting of October 28, 1985, the City Council introduced the Cable
Television Franchise Ordinance and adopted the Franchise Agreement contingent
upon the adoption of the Franchise at this meeting.
Michal Dittrich thanked the City Council for its cooperation and stated that
on behalf of Viacom Cablevision, she looks forward to continuing to serving
the Dublin area.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if Community TV would receive any type of financial
support through this program. Cm. Hegarty explained that this agreement was
not for that purpose, but that they will be building a building to house the
equipment, and will be training people to operate the equipment, etc.
City Manager Ambrose indicated that the Cities will need to discuss how they
will be spending their funds and whether they intend to utilize them
individually, or combine the funds.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous vote,
the Council waivbd the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 30 - 85
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND GRANTING OF FRANCHISES
OR PRIVILEGES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF
CABLE COMMUNICATION, OR CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS
AND FURTHER PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUING REGULATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF
THESE FRANCHISES AND THE ACTIVITIES RELATIVE TO THEM
PUBLIC HEARING
GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS/HAGMAN ASSOCIATES
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION TO DENY CUP AND SDR
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
On October 14, 1985, the City Council granted the request of Maria Pracher,
legal representative for Great Western Savings, to continue their appeal
until November 12, 1985.
On October 29, 1985, Ms. Pracher submitted a request for a second continuance
until the December 9th Council meeting. She indicated that Great Western
Savings is considering submitting a request to allow withdrawal of the appeal
and to allow consideration of a new Conditional Use Permit and Site Develop-
ment Review for a gated parking lot with a different configuration. At this
time, however, she is not prepared to formally withdraw the appeal.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous vote,
the Council continued the item until the meeting of December 9th.
CM-4-239
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
PUBLIC HEARING
NIELSEN SCHOOL BUS LOADING ZONE
Mayor Snyder declared the public hearing continued/reopened on this item.
The principal of Nielsen School has requested that a bus loading area be
provided south of the school 's south driveway on Amarillo Road.
The City Council at its October 28, 1985 meeting continued the public
hearing to allow a revision of the change in marking from red curb to signs
which would limit the no parking to non school hours.
The purpose of this bus only loading zone would be to provide a place for
two buses to load and unload students. At the present time the buses
attempt to park at the curb in the school ' s loop driveway, however, it is
frequently not possible due to parents picking up or dropping off children.
Currently, the curb fronting the school is signed as a loading zone from
8: 00 a.m. to 5: 00 p.m. on school days only. The proposed ordinance would
revise the existing ordinance and set aside 100 feet of curb signed as a bus
loading zone from 8: 00 a.m. to 5: 00 p.m. on school days only.
Principal Diane Griffiths indicated she was pleased with this ordinance.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the
Council waived the reading and on an urgency basis, adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 31 - 85
ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
(Bus Loading Zone - Amarillo Road)
GARBAGE FRANCHISE
SOLID WASTE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
The City Council has indicated its intent to become the franchisor for refuse
collection and disposal services. The existing franchise is administered by
DSRSD and will expire on April 1, 1986. Pursuant to the City Council
direction, Staff prepared a Request for Proposal which will assist in
determining the provider of this service.
The level of service contained in the draft proposal is based upon the
existing service provided through the franchise agreement between DSRSD and
Oakland Scavenger Company. The request requires the proposer to include two
annual residential cleanup offerings in the base residential rate. The cost
of providing additional residential cleanup services is also requested. In
an attempt to provide conformity in any proposals submitted, Staff has
requested that the providers rates include a 10% franchise fee. The current
fee imposed under the DSRSD contract is 7. 6%. In the past, the Board of
Directors of DSRSD have reduced the franchise fee in order to moderate the
cost increases to the customers. The 10% figure is used only in the RFP and
could be modified in the final agreement.
CM-4-240
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
The Request for Proposal also has provisions as to the ability of the
provider to assume the responsibility for trash service in the Camp Parks
Reserve Forces Training Area. The Dublin San Ramon Services District
currently administers the franchise for this area. As a matter of conven-
ience, it may be advantageous for them to contract with the franchisor
selected by the City of Dublin. The District General Manager has indicated
that currently, the Army facility is the only user of trash services in the
public lands area east of the existing City limits. For security purposes,
the County Jail and Federal Prison handle their own waste disposal. This
option is provided in the event that the Dublin San Ramon Services District
requested this type of arrangement.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if Arroyo Vista had been included in the past, and if
there were any problems with this type of service going on on private roads.
Assistant to the City Manager Rankin explained that it was his understanding
that Arroyo Vista is under the Oakland Scavenger franchise, and is treated
the same as multi-family complexes insofar as bin pickup rather than
individual can pickup. The City is attempting to develop service that will
serve the entire City of Dublin.
Cm. Vonheeder indicated a desire to check into the possibility or feasibility
of having a provider provide the roll-out can type service pickup. Cm.
Vonheeder felt that maybe this is an option Dublin should consider. Mr.
Rankin indicated the City could include a paragraph which would allow a
company to submit a bid for "streetside pickups.
The Council reviewed the RFP and directed Staff to include the above
paragraph, as discussed in the RFP.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote, the
Council directed Staff to circulate the document among qualified providers.
BART EXPRESS BUS ROUTE D PROPOSED CHANGES
The Bay Area Rapid Transit District is proposing changes in the BART Express
Bus Route D from Walnut Creek to Dublin. In the Dublin area, the existing
route is along Alcosta Boulevard and Village Parkway. The proposed new route
would be along San Ramon Road. The main reason for the proposed change is to
reduce the trip time and streamline the express bus service.
Cm. Jeffery questioned why the public meetings are done by Staff instead of
the elected officials. Jim Evans, BART representative explained that on
October 17th, the BART Board of Directors authorized public hearings to give
the general public an idea of what they are proposing. The meetings are
informational in nature.
Mr. Evans was questioned with regard to the status of park & ride lot
negotiations. Mr. Evans indicated that BART is continuing to negotiate with
Bedford Properties on a site and that environmental work has commenced.
CM-4-241
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
Cm. Jeffery questioned if BART would consider holding up on this new service
until local bus service is operating and until park & ride lots are in place.
Mr. Evans suggested that the City of Dublin send a letter to BART making
these requests. Mr. Evans also indicated that he felt the BART Board would
be receptive to Dublin' s request if at all possible.
Mayor Snyder asked if actual savings had been calculated by BART on this new
route. Mr. Evans explained that there are currently 87 stops from Dublin' s
Regional Street stop to the Walnut Creek BART station. Their main goal is to
provide fast efficient express bus service to BART. Only 20% of the riders
are transferring,.to BART, while 80% are making local trips.
Mayor Snyder questioned the timeline that BART is working with for this
modified service. Mr. Evans explained that the streamlined service is
scheduled to begin on March 8, 1986.
Cm. Jeffery felt that it should :be pointed out that the BART meetings are
being held for informational purposes only, rather than recorded public
hearings.
Cm. Jeffery questioned if any areas have used an express bus system with
success.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if the impact of a light rail system had been
considered. Mr. Evans responded that it had, however, bus service can be put
into place much quicker than a rail system.
City Engineer Thompson indicated to Mr. Evans that since the area along San
Ramon Road is basically residential and because of the City' s future
expansion plans for this road, Staff needs to know where bus stops are to be
located. Staff also questioned if BART would consider paying for the bus
pullouts along San Ramon Road. Mr. Evans indicated that BART was not paying
for the other pullouts along the route, with the exception of the new stops
being located at E1 Cerro and in Bishop Ranch.
The timing of the Alcosta Boulevard/San Ramon Road signal was discussed.
Staff reported that the anticipated timing of this signal, which is currently
out for bid, is late spring to early summer.
The Council reviewed the new route and directed Staff to prepare a letter to
BART requesting that BART wait to implement a change in the system until a
park & ride lot is in place in Dublin and until local bus service is
operating. A preview of the San Ramon Road construction plans should also be
included.
AMENDMENT TO ALAMEDA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
In accordance with State Law, each County is required to have a Solid Waste
Management Plan. In the County of Alameda, the Solid Waste Management
Authority was formed consisting of representatives from the City and the
County. The City of Dublin is presently a member of this Authority and
Mayor Peter Snyder is the City' s representative on the Authority.
CM-4-242
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
The Solid Waste Management Authority is presently considering an amendment
to the Alameda County Solid Waste Management Plan which would permit the
importation and disposal of San Francisco solid waste and sludge at the
Altamont Landfill. This amendment is proposed by Oakland Scavenger and
would permit San Francisco to import and dispose up to 15 million tons of
solid waste over a 50 year period beginning November 1, 1988. The amendment
would also permit San Francisco to dispose up to 130,000 tons per year of
sludge over that same 50 year period. An amendment to the Solid Waste
Management Plan requires the endorsement of a majority of the Cities.
The San Francisco Import Committee of the Authority initially developed a
Memorandum of Understanding with San Francisco which would permit San
Francisco to export 10 million tons of solid waste in January 1985. As part
of that Memorandum of Understanding, numerous conditions were placed upon
San Francisco in order to mitigate any negative environmental impacts and
also to maintain the life of the Altamont Landfill. This MOU does not
commit the Solid Waste Management Authority.
The major issues associated with consideration of this amendment are:
o Should Alameda County permit agencies outside of the County to dispose
of refuse at the Altamont -Landfill?
Staff ' s position was that there must be guarantees that Altamont meet the
needs of Alameda County residents first, and that the capacity is assured
for Alameda County users if import from outside agencies is permitted.
o Should San 'Francisco be permitted to import refuse over the next 50
years?
Staff recommended that the Council concur with both the 15 million ton limit
as well as the 50 year term with the conditions outlined by the San
Francisco Import Committee.
o Mitigation Fees. There has been considerable debate with respect to the
utilization of a $3. 50 per ton mitigation fee which would be charged to
San Francisco. Staff recommended that the import fees from San
Francisco be deposited with the Authority and be used for the following
purposes:
a) to acquire land to be publicly owned to replace the capacity
used by San Francisco or other importers;
b) to fund waste to energy projects that reduce the waste stream to
the Altamont;
c) to acquire land to buffer sites from future land use
incompatibility problems;
d) to pay for road maintenance and litter pickup on roads used for
import that are locally owned and maintained;
e) to pay for other direct environmental mitigation measures;
f) to fund recycling programs on a County wide or sub-County wide
basis.
CM-4-243
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985
o Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration The County has
undertaken an Environmental Initial Study and has determined that all of
the significant environmental impacts can adequately be mitigated.
These mitigation measures will occur through the various permit
processes which Oakland Scavenger will be required to go through.
Mayor Snyder indicated that the MOU is available for review in the City
Manager ' s office.
Discussion was held with regard to the fact that the disposal of hazardous
materials is becoming more and more of a concern.
Discussion was held relative to ' the capacity of the landfill. Mayor Snyder
referred to a recent study conducted by Bissell & Karn.
Mayor Snyder indicated that this amendment relates only to San Francisco
import, however, this proposal sets a precident with regard to the future of
the plan.
The Council reviewed the issues and directed the Council ' s representative on
the Authority, Mayor Snyder, to forward their comments to the Authority.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mayors ' Conference
City Manager Ambrose reminded the Council that Dublin was hosting the Alameda
County Mayors ' Conference on the following evening at Stafford ' s Restaurant
at 6: 30 p.m.
Recreational Vehicle Survey
City Manager Ambrose reported that the second edition of the City' s
Newsletter will be coming out soon and Staff suggested including a return
survey related to resident ' s feelings about the RV issue in Dublin.
The Council concurred regarding the inclusion of this item in the Newsletter.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was
adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Y
CM-4-244
Regular Meeting November 12, 1985