HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.6 Kolb Park Grant Application od
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 25, 1986
SUBJECT Kolb Park Grant Application
EXHIBITS ATTACHED 1) Application for Local Assistance
Grant
2 ) Resolution Approving Application
for Grant Funds Under the
California Park and Recreational
Facilities Act of 1984, Regional
Competitive Program
3 ) Project Proposal
4 ) Notice of Exemption
5 ) Location Map
6) Site Masterplan
7 ) Cost Estimate
8) List of Available Funds
9 ) Parks Location Map
RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution Approving Application
FINANCIAL STATEMENT Refer to Exhibits 7 and 8, Cost
Estimates and List of Available Funds
DESCRIPTION On June 5, 1984 , the California
Electorate voted in favor of Proposition 18, the California Park
and Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 , providing for the sale
of $370 million in bonds to assist with the development of parks .
Proposition 18 provides for five separate local grant programs
the largest of which is the Regional Competitive Program.
Applications for the third and final funding cycle under the
Regional Competitive Program are due by October 1, 1986. There
is $5, 327 , 000 in available funds for our region which encompasses
the bay area counties .
Staff has reviewed the grant process and attempted to identify
potential projects . Since this is a competitive program, only
the best projects as measured against pre-established criteria,
will be funded. Most importantly, the project should meet an
identifiable recreation need within the community and every
attempt should be made to achieve the greatest ratio of
recreation benefits to project costs . Funds are available for
development, rehabilitation and restoration projects . The types
of projects most often funded are neighborhood, community and
regional parks .
Given this criteria, staff has determined that the most
appropriate project would be the renovation of Kolb Park. At
the regular meeting of April 28, 1986, the Council approved the
masterplan outlining design criteria for the site . Additionally
the City Council approved the 5-year Capital Improvement Program
at their June 26, 1986 meeting, which provides for development of
Kolb Park in Fiscal Year 1986-87 . The Murray School District has
initiated the proceedings necessary to enable them to sell the
City the property for the park under the Naylor Act . The final
sale is pending approval of the State Department of Education.
The total project cost, as shown in Exhibit 7 , is estimated to be
$913, 120 . A breakdown of available funds is shown in Exhibit 8 .
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO.:
•
AGENDA STATEMENT - Kolb Park Grant Application
Page Two
The total amount of grant funds requested is $116, 280 . If
approved, these funds will provide for park walkways, entry
trellises, park furniture and pedestrian lighting. In the past
two funding cycles of the Regional Competitive Program, the
average grant for a City the size of Dublin was approximately
$100, 000 . Staff feels that the request for $116, 280 is
reasonable based on the criteria established by the State.
It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council -adopt the
resolution approving the application for grant funds, and direct
staff to file the appropriate materials by the October 1, 1986
deadline.
r
r
RESOLUTION NO. -86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
-----------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
UNDER THE REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROGRAM
OF THE CALIFORNIA PARK AND RECREATIONAL
FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 FOR
KOLB PARK
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have
enacted the California Park and Recreational Facilities Act of
1984 , which provides funds to the State of California and its
political subdivisions for developing facilities for public
recreational purposes ; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation
has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of
the program within the state, setting up necessary procedures
governing application by local agencies under the program; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State
Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to
certify by resolution the approval of applications before
submission of said applications to the state; and
WHEREAS, said applications contain assurances that the
applicant must comply with; and
WHEREAS, the applicant agency will enter into an
agreement with the State of California for development
rehabilitation or restoration of the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Dublin hereby;
1 . Approves the filing of an application for 1984 state grant
assistance for the above project ; and
2 . Certifies that said agency understands the assurances and
certification in the application; and
3 . Certifies that said agency has or will have sufficient funds
to operate and maintain the project, and if the project is
selected for state grant funding;
4 . Certifies that said organization will provide construction
plans and specifications to the state within one year of the
appropriation of funds under this program and will commence
work immediately after state approval; and
RESOLUTION NO. -86
Page Two
5 . Appoints the City Manager as agent of the City of Dublin to
conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents
including but not limited to applications, agreements,
amendments, payment requests, and so on, which may be
necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project .
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of August,
1986 .
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
State of California—The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIC
CALIFOh. -, PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITI. ,T OF 1984
APPLICATION FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT
Check one: X REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROGRAM
LAKES,RESERVOIRS AND WATERWAYS PROGRAM
NON-PROFIT PROGRAM
Project Name Amount of Grant Requested $ 116,280
Kolb Park (Min. Grant$10,000)
Estimated Total Project Cost S 913,120
Applicant(Agency —address incl. zip code) Project Location:
City of Dublin County: Alameda
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568 Nearest City: Dublin
Address and Nearest Cross Street:
Brighton Drive between Cardiff Drive
and Bristol Road
Applicants' Representative Authorized in Resolution
(type) Richard C. Ambrose City Manager (415 ) 829-4600
(Name) (Title) (Phone)
Person with day-to-day responsibility for project (if different from authorized representative)
(type) Diane Lowart Director of Recreation 1415 , 829-4932
(Name) (Title) (Phone)
Description of Project (Brief)
The five (5) acre Kolb Park site is centrally located in Dublin in a residential neighborhood
comprised of single family homes. The Kolb Park improvements address several important .
neighborhood needs and City functions. The Kolb site has been designed to accommodate tradi-
tional neighborhood park activities as well as specific senior citizen uses.
The project includes the renovation of existing recreational facilities as well as the con-
struction of new facilities. Major elements of this project include installation of park
furniture, installation of tot and children's play areas, field and irrigation rehabilitation,
lighted walkways, renovation of tennis courts and lighting, group picnic and shade structure,
parcourse, barbecues and restrocros.
Land Tenure—Project: 5.0 acres Census tract number in which project is located: 4504
x owned in fee simple by applicant (upon conclusion of negotiations with the Murray School
(Please Check) District)
available under a year lease (enclosed)
(Please Check)
other interest (explain) Check one (Regional Competitive Only):
(Please Check)
Estimate start project Complete project Neighborhood Park x
October 1986 July 1987 Community Park
date date Regional Park
I certify that the information contained in this application,including required attachments, is accurate and that I have read and under-
stand the important information and assurances on the reverse of this form.
Signed
Applicant's Authorized Representative as Shown in Resolution Date
Richard C. Ambrose, City Manager
certify that this project is consistent with the park and recreation plan of the above agency. (Not required for non-profit projects).
Signed
Representative of Applicant's Planning Agency Date
Larry L. Tong, Planning Director
DPR 644 (8/84) (over)
CALIFORNIA PARK AND RECREATION
FACILITIES.ACT OF 1984-
REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROJECT PROPOSAL
The project proposal offers local park and recreation providers an opportunity
to demonstrate that their proposed project merits funding under the Regional
Competitive Proqram. The information to be provided will permit the State to
evaluate the projects to determine their value rflative to other eompetinq
grant projects. In addition to striving for objectivity and uniformity in
applying the criteria, the State will make every effort to ensure the
equitable distribution of grant funds throughout the State.
The selection system consists of three phsses:'.- basic-eligibility, ranking
and tie breaking criteria. The first phase is applied to all applications
to determine project eligibility. Projects judged to be eligible will be
further considered. Scoring points are applied to ranking criteria.
BASIC ELIGIBILITY
C These two conditions determine the project's eligibility. To be considered
for funding, the project must meet the following:
1. Aa of the annual application filing deadline, the application must
be substantially complete. Applications must be fully complete
before the State selects projects to be eligible for funding. - A
fully complete application includes one each of the following: .
e application form • Site Plan
• Resolution • Cost Estimate
• Project Proposal • Funding Sources other than
Grant Funds
• CEQA Documents•
• Project Location Map • Permits (operatinq agreements,
ate.) Affecting Project
• Evidence of Land Tenure;- • Photographs
• Map Showing all your Local
Parks
• The applicant should strive to have made an initial study of environmental
impact of the proposed grant project by the time of application.
\ 1
2. The project must meet one or more of the following basic legislative
requirements:
Check the appropriate item(s) which apply to the project for which
you are asking grant funds. An on-site inspection may be made by ..,___
-the State.
+• _x Rehabilitation or restoration of existing facilities.
x Development of facilities to serve urban populations.?
C. Development of facilities which increase the grant recipients'
revenues by expanding public recreation sarvices.3/
Please explain:
d. Stimulation of new jobs.
Please explain: Jobs in construction will be stimulated by
the development of the site. The i y cnntracts for eiihlir works
services; completion of fhP nark Ci tP lanul d i nr=aam t•ha run+-ractors
workload thus creating additional positions
RANKING CRITERIA
These criteria provide the ranking for project applications that Mott the
eligibility requirements above. A point range is assigned to each criterion.
Projects will be classified into three categories . . . _regional-serving,
community-serving, or neighborhood-serving and compete separately within each
of the ten regions. The applying agency is to designate on the application
the category for its proposed project using its own standards and definitions.
The definitions provided below are only a guide. A euYimUM of 40♦ of the
regional allocation will be allowed each category unless there are insufficient
funding requests in any particular category.
A project will not necessarily be selected merely because it is the only
project, in a particular category. If the State determines that there are
not enough highly qualified projects to utilize the allocated funds in one
category, those funds may be used for projects in another cateWry.
CATEGORIES: Check here and on the Application.
X Naighborhood-serving - serves a neighborhood or elementary school
population.
Community-serving - serves several neighborhoods.
Regional-serving - serves several communities, a major portion of a
county or up to several counties (includes locally operated State
Park System units)
The eligible projects will be scored using the adopted criteria. These
criteria include need, use, access, efficiency, jurisdictional capability
and stewardship.
2
Type of Proposal :
X Rehabilitation
Replacement
New Development
NOTE: Rehabilitation and/or replacement proposals will be judged
as though they are creating new recreation opportunities .
Please complete the questionnaire accordingly.
I . NEED ( 0 - 45) ,
A. Project Justification Statement
Background of the City
The City of Dublin was incorporated in February of 1982
and serves a population of 17, 800 . Dublin is located
in Alameda County bordered on the North by Contra Costa
County, on the West by Camp Parks Reserve Forces
Training Area and on the South by Interstate 580 . The
City currently encompasses four (4 ) square miles with
an extended planning area of fifteen (15 ) square miles .
Annexation proceedings are currently underway for 2 , 600
acres East of Dublin which will more than double the
size of the City.
Prior to- .the City' s_ incorporation in 1.982, the Dublin -
San Ramon Services District had the responsibility for
acquisition and development of neighborhood and
community park and recreation facilities in Dublin and
Southern San Ramon. This agency currently owns and
maintains four '(4 ) outdoor recreational sites in
Dublin; 1) Dublin Sports Grounds - 23 acres, 2 )
Shannon Park and Community Center - 10 acres, 3 ) Valley
Community Swim Center - 3 acres, and 4 ) Mape Park - 3
acres .
During development of the City' s General Plan, it was
determined that the need for recreation facilities will
increase as population grows and if surplus school
sites are sold, there will be no public play space near
the homes of many children. Thus, the City earmarked
three ( 3 ) potential sites for neighborhood parks ; 1 )
East of Dougherty Hills as land is subdivided, 2 ) On
Fallon School Site when the site is sold by the Murray
School District and 3 ) On Dolan School Site when the
site is sold by the Murray School District .
History of Park Site
In the early 19701s, the Dublin San Ramon Services
District acquired the land for Kolb Park and developed
it into a neighborhood park. The park site was
adjacent to the Fallon Elementary School. Park
amenities included two (2 ) lighted tennis courts, a
children ' s play area and open space play fields . In
the aftermath of Proposition 13, the District no longer
had the funds to maintain the site, so they gave the
park to the Murray School ,Pistrict. In the ensuing
years, the site has been left to fall into disrepair
due to subsequent funding shortages of the School
District . As neighborhood use of the park declined due
to deterioation of the site, vandalism and crime in and
around the park increased. In response to the decline
of the park, the surrounding neighborhood mounted a
campaign to urge the School District to maintain and
improve the site and sought better survelliance by
local authorities .
The City of Dublin began negotiations for purchase of
the park property in September of 1983 . As the School
District had designated the site and the adjoining
elementary school as surplus school property, the City
pursued a purchase agreement under the Naylor Act . The
final sale is pending approval from the State
Department of Education.
Unmet Need
There is currently only one neighborhood park serving
the entire population of Dublin. In addition, there is
only one community park in the City of Dublin. Both of
these parks are on the West side of the City. For
those residents in Central and Eastern Dublin, access
to those two parks is inhibited by the Interstate 680
Freeway which bisects the City.
The make-up of the neighborhood in the applicable
service area is diverse . The majority of residences
are single family homes comprised of senior citizens,
families with young children and families with teenage
children. Kolb Park has been designed to serve the
needs of the neighborhood taking into account the
diversity in ages . Currently there is not a park in
the City designed to meet the needs and desires of a
variety of age groups .
4
B. Deficiencies in Similar Park/Recreation Facilities
Within the applicable service area, there is no
neighborhood or community park. Those who wish to go
to the park must travel two to three miles and cross
several major intersections . The elementary school in
the area does provide turfed playfields, but the
maintenance and upkeep is minimal at best . The City' s
only high school is within the applicable service area
as well as the community swimming Pool. The high
school has six unlighted tennis courts and athletic
fields but due to the fact that these facilities are on
the school grounds, use is limited to that time when
school is not in session or high school athletic
programs are not utilizing them.
In the entire City, there is one neighborhood park, one
community park, a community swim center and a sports
complex. The swim center and the sports complex are
meeting the needs of those residents wishing to engage
in active pursuits . But for those residents who enjoy
more passive recreational activities, . park space is
severely limited. Of the park space available in the
City, the following deficiencies can be found:
1 . No lighted tennis courts
2 . No facility with a separate tot and
children ' s play area
3 . No parcourse/exercise course
4 . No group picnic area with barbecues
and access to water and restrooms
5 . No outdoor park facility designed for senior
citizen use
6 . No tot tricycle area
In conclusion, there is not one park in the City that
provides -for the type of uses proposed for Kolb Park.
Although Kolb Park is considered to be a neighborhood
park, until there are additional parks developed in the
City, we anticipate that Kolb will have to serve the
needs of residents in the entire City.
C . Demand for Recreation Opportunities to be Provided by
the Project
1. What is the total population of the service area
for the park? 4 , 500
2 . What percentage of that population will use the
project? 100%
5
3 . What percentage of the annual use of your project
will come from outside the service area? 40%
4 . Who will use this project and what groups are
represented?
The park is designed to serve all age groups and
will be handicapped accessible. The site is
adjacent to the City' s Senior Citizen
Center and the Kaleidoscope Activity Center for
Disabled Youth.
5 . Provide the existing developed recreation and
park acres per thousand population within your
jurisdiction:
2 . 2 acre/thousand
6. Provide the existing developed recreation and park
acres per thousand for the category you are
competing under:
Less than one quarter acre/thousand for
neighborhood parks .
D. Public Support, Public Participation and Local
Financial Effort
1 . Does your project have local public support?
Which groups support your project?
The Kolb Park Project has a tremendous amount of
public support . The parks biggest support group
are the neighbors who live adjacent to the park.
These neighbors have been actively involved in the
disposition of the site for some years now,
circulating petitions, attending public meetings
and writing letters . The second biggest support
group is the Senior Citizens of the community.
Kolb Park is located adjacent to the designated
City Senior Citizen Center. During the design
process, the City' s seniors were well represented
at public meetings resulting in the addition of a
passive "senior" area in the park. In addition,
residents from outside the applicable service area
have voiced support of the park as it will have
those amenities lacking in other parks in the
City.
2 . Does your project have public opposition? None
6
3 . Is there additional assistance on the project
(government or private funds, volunteer labor,
donation of materials ) ?
$15, 300 has been received from Robert-Z 'berg
towards this project in addition to park
dedication fees .
4 . Are there other funding sources suitable for
financing your project? Have you explored these
sources?
The City is committed to the development of Kolb
Park and will supplement the grant funds received
with general fund monies .
5 . Has a local public participation process been
incorporated into this project?
During the development of the masterplan, two
neighborhood meetings were held and one public
meeting each before the Park & Recreation
Commission and the City Council. The public was
well represented at all four of the meetings .
II . USE (0 - 15 )
A. Potential Use When Completed (Annual Visitation)
Estimate total annual visitation (activity days ) to
the facility(s ) proposed for grant funding (total
number of times the facililty(s ) will be used by
individuals ) .
The park will be open and available for use 365 days
per year. As the City does not currently own another
neighborhood park, it is difficult to access annual
visitation.
B. Availability for Use
1. Give the number of days per week the facility(s )
will be open and available to the general public :
7 days
2 . Give the number of months per year the facility(s )
will be open: 12 months
3 . Give proposed hours of use : 7a.m.-lop.m.
7
4 . Can the grant funded facility(s ) be used for
activities other than the primary use? Yes
The park is designated as a neighborhood park, but
will have amenities unique to the City thus making
it more "community" in nature.
III . ACCESS (0 - 10 )
A. Adequacy of Physical Access to the Site .
x More than one access point to project
x Public transportation services
x Bicycle trails or lanes
NA Horse trails or paths
NA Hiking trails or paths
x Parking at or adjacent to site
NA Boating access
x Safe pedestrian access
x Facilities are accessible to the handicapped
x Freeways or major roadway access
x Other (list) Within walking distance of City' s
Senior Center
B. Barriers That May Restrict Access
None
IV. EFFICIENCY (0 - 10 )
A. Rehabilitation/Replacement Projects
Will the project meet any of the following goals?
1 . Reduce operation and maintenance cost? Yes
The site is designed to be low maintenance taking
into account the materials used and their
placement in relation to maintenance requirements .
2 . Incorporate energy and water saving features? Yes
Energy efficient park lighting and tennis court
lights, drought resistant planting and well
designed placement of irrigation system.
3 . Generate additional revenues? Yes
Meters for tennis court lights . Potential for
renting out group picnic facility.
8
4 . Offer activities other than the primary use? No
- - - 5 . Provide for adaptive use (recycling) of an
existing structure or site? Yes
When considering the design of Kolb Park, close
attention was paid toward those areas in the park
that could be reused. Both the tennis courts and
the play area will be refurbished instead of
demolished. In addition, every effort will be
made to utilize the existing irrigation system.
6. Involve a cooperative effort with one or more
local agencies or non-profit groups? Yes
The land for the park was purchased through a
cooperative agreement with the Murray School
District at 250 of the current market value. In
addition, the City has worked cooperatively with
the senior citizens in order to have their
interests addressed in the park design.
B. New Developments
1 . For new developments please explain how the goals
shown in IV, A. 1-6, will relate to your project .
See comments under Rehabilitation/Replacement
Projects .
V. JURISDICTIONAL CAPABILITY (0- 15 )
A. Ability to Initiate and Complete Grant Projects
1 . Have your plans and specifications been prepared?
Yes
A preliminary Master Plan has been prepared.
Selection of a consultant to prepare final design
and construction documents is underway.
Preliminary estimates for completion of these
documents is January, 1987 . Construction is
scheduled to begin in March, 1987 .
2 . How soon will project construction start after the
funds are appropriated by the Legislature?
Immediately
9
3 . Have you had a previous State Grant?
�No. of Active No. of Completed_
„ Projects Projects
Roberti-Z 'berg (SB174 ) One None
1974 Park Bond --- ---
1976 Park Bond --- ---
1980 Park Bond --- ---
VI . STEWARDSHIP ( 0 - 5)
A. Stewardship of the Applying Agency with Regard to the
Protection and Enhancement of Its Recreation Resources
1 . Has your agency converted parkland to other non-
park or recreation uses in the past five years?
No
2 . Has your agency abandoned, neglected or closed
developed parks or recreation areas during the
past five years? No
Since incorporation the City has taken an
aggressive stance toward providing park and
recreation opportunities for the community. Over
the next five years, the City plans to construct
or renovate seven parks totaling 120 acres .
10
CITY OF DUBLIN
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568 (415) 829-4600
"-NOTICE- OF -EXEMPTION -
TO: County Clerk - County of Alameda FROM: City of Dublin
Planning Department
6500 Dublin Blvd.
Suite 100
Dublin, Ca 94568
PROJECT TITLE: Kolb Park
PROJECT LOCATION: Brighton Drive between Bristol Road and
Cardiff Drive, Dublin, Alameda County,
California 94568
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The five ( 5 ) acre Kolb Park site is
centrally located in Dublin in a residential neighborhood
comprised of single family homes . The Kolb Park improvements
address several important neighborhood needs and City functions .
The Kolb site has been designed to accommodate traditional
neighborhood park activities as well as specific senior citizen
uses .
The project includes the renovation of existing recreational
facilities as well as the construction of new -facilities . . _Major
elements of this project include installation of park furniture,
installation of tot and children ' s play areas, field and
irrigation rehabilitation, lighted walkways, renovation of tennis
courts and lighting, group picnic and shade structure, parcourse,
barbecues and restrooms .
The City of Dublin, on August 25, 1986, found that the above
approved project has the following exempt status :
Categorical Exemption, Class 1, Section 15301
Class 2, Section 15302
Class 3, Section 15303
Reasons why project is exempt :
The repair and renovation of the tennis courts and the minor
alteration of the picnic area to include a shade structure are
exempt under Class 1, Section 15301. The replacement of park
furniture, tot and children ' s play areas, field and irrigation
rehabilitation, lighted walkways and group picnic area are exempt
under Class 2, Section 15302 . The construction of a small
restroom/storage facility adjacent to the tennis courts is exempt
under Class 3, Section 15303 .
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
Page Two
Kolb Park, previously oowned-by th'e Murray-'School District, ywas�
orginally designed, built and utilized as a neighborhood park.
Due to funding cutbacks, the site has fallen into disrepair. The
proposed renovation of the site by the City of Dublin will
involve negligible or no increase in use or environmental impacts
beyond those previously existing when the park was well
maintained and heavily utilized by neighborhood residents .
TELEPHONE: (415 ) 829-4932 I
SIGNATURE:
L urence L. Tong, Plan n g Director
DATE OF SIGNATURE: August 25, 1986
DATE OF MAILING:
DP 83-03
Dublin General Plan Kolb Location
Kolb Park ''
�.... .,,Y..........:.. 4
�
Residential
v,....:.:....•�n
Primary' Planning Area -FamyRes denfial
�' '�!' i;, Median^Density nesidential
H—ised to Include City Council ,-�
changes through July 71, 1994 ® Medium-Hgh Density Residential
�,•a n`po r , �1 ) { �, '. Commerclal/Industrial
.--^ Y' f (a F a`. r jj� netail/olfica
jy1t ,. s:..•. 11��'�,t r}'�-,fit R� •r j�� Retail/Office 6/Automotive
'/- :� '�'�j•"_ %//j t i-3 'Y ',�:: r,-t. �'o ,.i ,•o.:::;;• Via. . 1
r r ^t �•r.; - _S ) r °"•. ._ o•�.. ` 'tL Y � Business Park/industrial
c.wc - '•,•�'?,,]. ^i�J.{}}:= ' F(f..`G �'71�f::: :•Y 1 �}'Ij ���� 1 �,� :e'-_''.'.7 �••. :•'; �`.l7. c-w Business Park/Industrial:.
Ouldoor Storage
r;-. ` :?..r •4l;� i�:i r '� �.). y, �Q - 11�
fl)if) .,. � , : ;•R �
-ay ;.� Publk/SemFPub I lc/Ope n
,� .. +: }" k,''f1�. t t "\ '1 - r r: .. .,^�.,. >i• .�t4 '.�'c'tt, J? / 6b:: P.uic/Semi-Pudic racim
a' .�Llil' 11'.r%�;• �� Parks/Recreation
y'O• 7`k,t ^^ 1Y-./ if�f• } S S��� •-;:1�•. '','�.� +�`�== ?.I=i� f\ �'?\ .. j'�. `'q 4t?�-,J Open :Stream Corridor
jjj
�����• Circulation
� �1� /51t�(�j ''�,':Pr.'' ,`, y r1 e.e...e..r ^%'�+.'.:v I •`►; iJ, s' ..
\`? ! r Y7 _ 7.: ':'.•: �T,Y�a a ,! .,•... �'�' � L. �t�i. :ll .r f.. Arterial Street
Z 11�}I ``' Collector Street
Ir I t. _ sl ' �•'e,,J.��� .\ c .S �Fl1 ! \ 'r.�G it ti{ .�/' �. 5� t��'::1 i:•�• \?'c!�}.y ---_.
Ei t t �CC-• ;. t :Ply T r�' j`.,. �{t} 4` BART
1 I `
U I 1 /1f 1� � ££ftii ts. A f �\•,�, .}; '!�T 5� )/ rT S�. i! .--...� Transportation.
Cordor
�- -i:/7;/r'�'I- _ t'� � 1�.'I�> �' U� ^'i�J. �1>�., '.,c •o°" .r�n�r'Y :'•r.•>'�i. �'•.
_.
I• tf:. -� Y.: •i1%'.1)` �'G ,/// 11 J/-rJ7�� ..
-�_.�• !G _ _ f/ll �! Ali '':`�:�i:�[:i•�.�::�:�:�:�i:'! / •�O
�%/
-:: l;.•
,4%. t t! l."r '� ••:/ /�// �j l::i�'n�':% , Q40//ho l .\
� '`•"Cj.L- _f � / ./� ./ :f. ;p': ';fe;<::.,/ Vii,-
t
:
j
Blw,1,Er DIE".11116^1,NN REG�e•✓1 RNI'CRS --
r
rcmmETER
scn[cN PLANTING
� OENC�
5'-0'PAT 1
AMITY PICfU m„yux�w•vt
CNIOREN'S PLAY AREA ,.
,1
ENTRY SMUCTURE
\ EXERCISE STATIONS
vi
--
\i a !
Zi ` I DECOMPOSED
�, . [• .%• GRANITE PATII
• L PEDFSTn1AN
04 TOT TRICYCLE f �+Y t
Ri AREA _— / �1 , i LiGI111NO
H
� PARENT'S SEATING ends
E--4 _-C� 41 4. .
All
i
rEnIMETEn
CREEP PLANTING
GROUP PICNIC and
! RESTROOM9 I SILAGE S1111U (IXTE
U.IPTIOVE EXISTING
TEUNIS OUn
I i
TENNIS WAITING , LAWN
i
FAMILY PICNIC/
EtTTRY 9TFiUCTURE 1 GAME TABLES
Kolb Park Masterplan
City of Dublin • California 01
BEAT WALL
ti OEM"
I
f' OECOLmoSEo
ORAMTE PATI/
• 'r / .. \� `� \. `i• \ B'-o'PATH
BAnOEQUE
i
1A
SPECIAL PAVIUG
�,• ` . �� ACCENT PLANTIIIQ
orTOUr FIC14C SIIELTER
Kolb Park T'LANTETI W/SPECIMEN MEE
Group Picnic Area Enlargement FAMILY PICNIC/GAME TABLES
ore 16
City of Dublin - California
KOLB PARK
DEVELOP14ENT CONCEPT
The Kolb Park improvements address several important neighborhood needs and City func-
tions. The Kolb site has been designed to accommodate 'taditional neighborhood park acti-
vities as well as specific senior citizen uses.
To accommodate both neighborhood and senior functions, to maximize the parks use areas ,
and to develop a more attractive and functional park, the proposed redevelopment will
include:
1. Expanded Lawn Area. An open grass meadow area which will act as a visually unifyinly
e I ement n fife park. This large turf area can be used for informal games and sports
activities in addition to picnicking, relaxing and free play.
2. Park Furniture. Picnic tables, benches , game tables, barbecues and refuse recep-
tacles. Fie
T --Turniture will be designed with materials that will be compatible with
the character of the park, as well 'as adequately structured to provide for ease of
maintenance, normal wear and vandalism.
3. Senior Facilityy. A small terrace area and shade trellis located adjacent to tine
rnea ow area will provide a sheltered spot for relaxing, sitting and table games
such as chess, checkers or cards. Picnic tables and barbecue units are also included
in this area.
A. Play Areas. A tots and apparatus play area containing a combination of specially
designed creative play apparatus and high quality standard equipment. The older
children' s play area will feature imaginative, heavy timbered play structures as well
as high quality standard equipment, including slides, swings, and climbing apparatus.
The tot area intended for children from two to six years of age will feature low
scale, creative timber play structures as well as low slides , swings , and spring
riders. A paved tricycle riding area is located between the tot lot and play area.;
5. Park Circulation. A meandering path system will guide people through the parks and
connect the various facilities, including a series of exercise stations.
6. Planting_. A mixture of broadleafed evergreen , conifers and deciduous tree plantings.
he dominant park planting will be large scale, relatively fast growing, canopy trees
to provide shade and a park like atmosphere. Conifers and broadleafed evergreens will
be utilized for screen plantings and accents along the park' s perimeter. Shrubbery
and groundcover will be kept to a minimum in the park because of maintenance and sur-
veillance considerations.
7. Restroom. Construction of a new restrPom building adjacent to the play area/tennis
complex wil briny the equipment storage and restrooms closer to the areas of most
heavy use.
8. Tennis Courts. The existing tennis courts and lighting are to be repaired and
upgraded. A tree shaded terrace sitting area located between the tennis courts and
play,area will be a pleasant area to wait for the courts and to supervise children at
play in the adjacent play areas.
SINGER & HODGES, Inc.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1512 FRANKLIN STREET
OAKLAND, CA 94612
(415)891.9669
KOLB PARK
PRELIMINARY MASTERPLAN
COST ESTIMATE
CITY OF DUBLIN
APRIL 7, 1986
Bid Item Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Item Total
Site Work & Landscaping
1. Site Prep & Clearing 234,600 S.F. .03 $ 7,040.
2. Remove Existing Walk 6,420 S.F. 2.00 12,840.
3. Remove Existing Sand 7,600 S.F. .60 4,560.
4. Regrading 149,250 S.F. .25 37,312.
5. Drainage Allow --- --- 16,000.
6. Irrigation - Renovation -- -
of Existing System &
Additions to System* 173,950 S.F. .25 43,490.
7. Reseed Entire Turf Area 173,950 S.F. .30 52,185.
8. Trees 180 EA. 85.00 15,300.
SUBTOTAL: $ 188,727.
Walks, Lighting, Furniture
& Trellis
1. Concrete Walkway 12,420 S.F. 4.00 $ 492680.
2. Quarry Waste 4,800 S.F. 1.00 4,800.
3. Entry Trellises 2 EA. 4,000.00 8,000.
4. Park Furniture
A. Picnic Tables on
Concrete Pads 9 EA. 850.00 7,650.
PHILIP SINGER,ASLA RONALD HODGES,ASIA JOHN MONTAGUE.ASLA
Kolb Park
Preliminary Masterplan
Cost Estimate
Page 2
Bid Item Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Item Total
Walks , Lighting, Furniture
& Trellis (Cont'd)
B. Benches 7 EA. 450.00 3,150.
C. Trash Receptacles 6 EA. 350.00 2,100.
D. Drinking Fountain &
Potable Water Line Allow --- --- 2,500.
5. Pedestrian Lighting 12 EA. 3,200.00 38,400.
SUBTOTAL: $ 116,280
Recreational Facilities
1. Older Children Play Area Allow --- --- $ 45,000.
2. Tricycle Area— Allow --- --- 18,000.
3. Tot Lot Allow --- --- 35,000.
4. Parent Seating, & Tennis,
Including Benches, Pav-
ing, Tables & Trellis Allow --- --- 15,000.
5. Tennis Courts
A. Renovate & Resurface Allow --- --- 20,000.
B. Lighting Renovation Allow --- --- 3,500.
6. Group Picnic & Shade
Structure
A. Paving 4,000 S.F. 4.00 16,000.
B. Trellis 2,100 S.F. 30.00 63,000.
C. Game/Picnic Tables 8 EA. 800.00 6,400.
D. Barbeque 1 EA. 850.00 850.
7. Parcourse Allow --- --- 10,000.
SUBTOTAL: $ 232,750.
Kolb Park
Preliminary Masterplan
Cost Estimate
Page 3
Unit Item
Bid Item Description Quant Units Cost Total
Additive Alternate
Alternate No. 1 -
Restroom Building. Allow --- --- $70 , 000 .
Alternate No . 2 -
Additional Cost to
Replace Remainder of
Existing Irrigation
System 80,400 S . F. . 25 20 , 100 .
SUBTOTAL : $90 , 100 .
BID ITEM DESCRIPTION
1 . Site Work & Landscaping $188, 727 .
2 . Walks , Lighting , Furniture & Trellis 116 , 280 .
3 . Recreational Facilities 232 , 750 .
4 . Additive Alternate 90 , 100 .
14% Design Engineering & Contract SUBTOTAL : 627 , 857 .
Administration 87 , 900 .
15% Contingency 107, 363 .
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS : $ 183 , 120 .
LAND ACQUISITION : 90 ,000 .
TOTAL PROJECT COST : $913 , 120 .
CITY OF DUBLIN
KOLB PARK
LIST OF AVAILABLE FUNDS
Source Amount
1 . Roberti-Z 'berg Urban Open
Space & Recreation Program $ 15, 300
(City Matching Contribution) 3, 800
2 . Park Dedication Fees 514, 900
3 . City General Fund 262, 840
Total Available Funds $796, 840
Amount of Grant Request $116, 280
TOTAL PROJECT COST $913, 120
Dublin General Plan
Primary Planning Area
Revised to Include City Council �/.• ,.
ch:wgcs Through July 71, 1984 G - ••
\` ; f
%///
� �r;_ "111? — iY,'`=•' '�A <s:. :4� E 'i:.:I�1::' �".=-' •i� `�r� �� �i
�c ",�r Y_`',ijLi JJ� - l'i;:i ••r", t-37"� .z�t��[ [ ����.�It�
A .\..,; '6•.' .,q t
cs•�•/�n ✓ ••,'•, %��,1 -t- ,�=�, -K"
1 ,-N; ` I't \•', '1' a•r... .trj,��h. to
�' •'Ce: L:..f l.. F:j: .,/ .li , ..t LL \-�.\t :.�✓
-Ct'•it }'_1 °� \Q�'••., � .. ,11: t ,`, a� -
i .1 J� i::; y u<'�:.. ;�' 1. Community Swim Center
zt( rI ; )1. �-��• r. 6•:; 2. Kolb Park
- ,> ',+•r ':x .t,. �..�; _.�:'•'.,1�, IY:,��-'' e.. 3. Shannon Park
�T� �k4 :
A. •'�' 0 4. Ma a Park
q,I i ��t-�rl��%f, t; T}t1 :t':.�^;;•'r1�l�f' � .1'�/I:��t say... '.''f.t (?tr�i ,,,• _ � 5. Sports GTOUnC15
i / a � 1/',lJ ji N'P�• ..]SlL'C-1i w.� '!� h,l:.: ��� ,;'C;/r ,r.:1."• 1.
/ 1 �,'t 11'1'[ .,.;. � (` ..�".::�•''•r.. ::` .t!..' � h
' i-T"�''� ?.c.-.:• +__1?1:1 Q� ^�J;��;:?r•f. ��. 1. �.' (\:���' �A.`-��.!.'i F -' iU.
h � :;:�( ..t. mil•. `t S"V��• .C,,,��;i:, - ,'S;). ''_ ��..',;,:
�7. jjr'' ,o:'�:��:�`, .� r�\�la� `'':;�J•t^" .�'t"!�''% if '},..,,'/.`_
Al
O 1 !\� _ �.r^^`t iT .�14�' �j� '.jtrt.t;..1�{(j � �`� °>��'!.'��:• ��. �� .i'�� `l�'.C�� �Jy�.��,,J ••\"��
� It �T`.I I- 4'"-,�j j°�'' I J ��r7�lL �� r �, '<-3'' �Y' �J .'Y 1a7.f •'
=i. , ':1! �• ,� // ;��? I�.tl.: h;{�;art,j,r �l- ::::%
,
L _..1 � _-i I i.......................
.M,ERS,SIE 110
M/�rwE r D,E,1.U"eN.4.0°(Gd,N�.A•e.EeS
f
1
,