HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.3 Camp Parks Annexation No. 2 AGENDA STATEMENT _
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 13, 1986
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Annexation No. .2 Public Lands
(Camp Parks)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Attachment I - Resolution Approving Annexation
Attachment II - Resolution Disapproving
Annexation
Attachment III - LAFCO Resolution No. 86-23
Approving Annexation No. 2
Subject to Conditions
RECOMMENDATION: ��ol 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff
presentation.
2) Take testimony, including any protests,
from the public.
3) Question Staff and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Determine value of any protests.
6) Depending on value of any protests:
A) adopt Resolution ordering annexation
without election (Attachment I) ; or
B) direct Staff to prepare a Resolution
ordering annexation subject to
election, and continue the matter to
the October 27, 1986, City Council
meeting; or
C) adopt Resolution terminating
annexation proceedings (Attachment
II).
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The City and County have agreed to a property
tax agreement that was previously approved by
the City Council.
DESCRIPTION: Pursuant to the provisions of the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985 relating to annexations, three specific actions
must occur prior to the City Council proceeding with the proposed Public Lands
Annexation: 1) the City Council must summarize the LAFCO Resolution for the
annexation; 2) the City Council must conduct a public hearing to consider
protests of the annexation; 3) the City Council must adopt a Resolution making
findings regarding the written protests and take action on the annexation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO. co. COPIES TO: Planning Department
I. Summary of LAFCO Resolution
On September 11, 1986, LAFCO approved the proposed Public Lands (Camp
Parks) Annexation finding that: 1) the proposed annexation is consis-
tent with procedures and policies of LAFCO; 2) the annexation will
permit the provision of municipal services by Dublin to the annexation
area. LAFCO approved the annexation subject to the following
conditions:
1) That correction of the maps be made as may be required.
2) That the City of Dublin is designated the conducting authority and
authorized to initiate proceedings.
3) That LAFCO recommends that the City of Dublin study the property
to determine if there are areas within the property which may be
benefited by freeway improvements and, if such benefits are found,
to support the creation of an assessment district or similar
vehicle for the financing of the cost of construction of that
portion of the freeway improvements which confer special benefits
on areas within the property.
4) That LAFCO recommends that the City of Dublin participate jointly
with the City of Pleasanton and any other public agencies having
jurisdiction within the property in formation of a joint powers or
other special purpose entity or commission, for the purpose of
defining a "scope of work" for the freeway improvements,
determining the cost thereof, and retaining an "engineer of work"
to determine the boundaries of the benefited area. The object of
the City of Dublin's participation with other public agencies
shall be to attain an official determination of the extent of
improvements, cost of improvements, and proportion of costs to be
borne by the benefited area.
II. Public Hearing
The City Council must conduct a public hearing to hear and consider
written or oral protests or evidence made concerning the annexation.
Protests are limited to land owners or registered voters within the
proposed annexation area. All written protests must include the
following:
1) state whether it is made by a land owner or registered voter;
2) the name and address of the owner of the affected land and the
street address of the land;
3) the name and address of the registered voter as it appears on the
registration affidavit; and
4) . the date and signature. Any protests without a date and signature
may be disregarded.
III City Council Resolution
The City Council must adopt a Resolution making findings concerning the
value of the protest and take action on the annexation.
1) If a "majority protest" of 50% of the registered voters (26 of 52
voters) protest the annexation, the City Council must abandon the
proceeding. Staff has requested from the County Assessor the
assessed value of land within the proposed annexation area. If
available this information will be presented at the October 13,
1986, City Council meeting.
2) If written protests have been received by a) 25% (13 of 52 voters)
of the registered voters, or b) by at least 25% of the land owners
who own 25% of the assessed value of the land within the
annexation area, the City Council can order the annexation subject
to confirmation by the registered voters residing in the
annexation area.
-2-
YR-
. � ! . .
3) If written protests have been filed a) by less than 25% of the
registered voters (less than 13 of 52 voters), or b) by less than
25% of the land owners owning less than 25% of the assessed value
of the land within the annexation area, the City Council can order
the annexation without an election.
Two Resolutions have been prepared for adoption depending upon the
outcome of the public hearing.
Staff recommends the City Council:
A) Conduct the public hearing to consider any protests or objections
to the proposed annexation.
B) Determine the value of any protests received.
C) Depending on the value of any protests, take one of the following
actions:
1) adopt a Resolution approving the annexation (Attachment I);
or
2) direct Staff to prepare a Resolution approving the
annexation subject to election and continue the matter to
the October 27, 1986, City Council meeting; or
3) adopt a Resolution disapproving the annexation (Attachment
II).
-3-
,r
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLUTION APPROVING "CITY OF DUBLIN ANNEXATION
#2 - PUBLIC LANDS (CAMP PARKS ) "
WHEREAS, the Dublin City Council has initiated the
annexation of certain inhabited territory designated as "City of
Dublin Annexation #2 - Public Lands (Camp Parks) "; and
WHEREAS, LAFCO has, at the times, in the form, and in
the manner provided by law, considered the petition of the City;
and
WHEREAS, LAFCO has authorized the City to proceed with
the annexation by LAFCO, and has approved the annexation subject
to the following terms and conditions:
a) Correction of the map and description as may be required by
the Director of Public Works, ex-officio County Surveyor; and
b) Designate the City of Dublin as the conducting authority and
authorize the City to initiate proceedings for the proposed
annexation in compliance with this resolution; and
c) The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission
recommends that the City of Dublin study the Property to
determine if there are areas within the Property which may be
benefited by the Freeway Improvements and if such benefits
are found, to support the creation of an assessment district
or similar vehicle for the financing of the cost of
construction of that portion of the Freeway Improvements which
confer special benefits on areas within the Property; and
d) The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission further
recommends that the City of Dublin participate jointly with
the City of Pleasanton and any other public agencies having
jurisdiction within the Property in formation of a joint
powers or other special purpose entity or commission, for the
purpose of defining a "scope of work" for the Freeway
Improvements, determining the cost thereof, and retaining -an
"engineer of work" to determine the boundaries of the
Benefited . area. The object of the City of Dublin' s
participation with other public agencies shall be to attain an
official determination of the extent of improvements, cost of
improvements, and proportion of costs to be borne by the
Benefited Area.
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was duly given in
accordance with law; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing at 7: 30 p.m. ,
October 13, 1986, at the City Council ' s regular meeting place, to
consider testimony concerning the proposed annexation; and
TTAUO'hH tr
WHEREAS, all oral and written protests, objections and
evidence were considered by the City Council;
WHEREAS, after closing the public hearing, the Council
determined that written protests have been filed and not withdrawn
by less than 25% of the registered voters or less than 25% of the
number of owners of land owning less than 25% of the assessed
value of land within the affected territory.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. THAT THE Dublin City
Council does hereby find that:
S ection 1. That pursuant to the provisions of the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Government Code §§ 56000 et seq. , the Council approves and orders,
without election, the annexation of that real property situate in
the County of Alameda, State of California (designated as "City of
Dublin Annexation #2 - Public Lands (Camp Parks) " and more
particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, to the City of Dublin.
Section 2. The reason for said annexation is to
facilitate orderly growth and development of the subject property
in a manner consistent with the Legislature's findings and
declarations, as contained in Government Code § 56001.
Section 3 . The regular county assessment roll will be
utilized.
Section 4. The real property to be annexed will not be
taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness by the City of
Dublin.
Section 5. That the City Clerk is directed- to send a
certified copy of this resolution to the LAFCO Executive Officer.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of
1986.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
November 1, 1985
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ANNEX
TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN
All that certain real property situated in the counties of
Contra Costa and Alameda, State of California, described as
follows :
A PORTION of the 3636.1222 acre tract of land commonly
known as Camp Parks Military Reservation, acquired by the
United States of America, by Decree of Final Condemnation, made
by -the District Court of the United States for the Northern -
District of California, Southern Division, Case Number 22352-R,
a certified copy of which was recorded August 1, 1947, in Book
5132 of Official Records, page 1 (AB 65698) Records of _Alameda
County, California, described as follows :
BEGINNING at a point on the boundary line dividing Alameda
County from Contra Costa County, said boundary line was
established by . that certain "REPORT ON A JOINT RETRACEMENT
SURVEY AND MONUMENTATION OF A PORTION OF THE BOUNDARY LINE
BETWEEN .ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES - 1960" approved by
the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County under Resolution No.
99517, adopted February 27, 1962 and filed in Reel 1 of
Minutes, Image 966, said point being the intersection with the
centerline of County Road No. 4038, commonly known as Dougherty -
Road, 50 feet in width, as said centerline is described in that
certain AMENDED JUDGMENT, Case No. 22352-R; IN THE DISTRICT
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN AND FQR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
THE CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff v. 3396 Acres of land, Alameda and Contra Costa
Counties, California, et al, Defendants, done in open court on
June 4, 1945, a certified copy of which was recorded June 8 ,
1945 , in Book 4721 of Official Records, page 14, Records of
Alameda County, California, said centerline being in common
with the general westerly boundary of said Camp Parks Military
Reservation and coterminous with the general easterly boundary
line of that certain territory, known as Volk-McLain Company
Annexation, annexed to Parks Community Services District now
known as Dublin San Ramon Services District, said boundary
being established under Ordinance No. 1 of Parks Community
Exhibit A
11/05/85
Page 2
Services District now known as Dublin San Ramon Services
District, said boundary being established under Ordinance No. 1
of Parks Community Services District, a certified copy of which
was recorded July 11, 1960 , in Reel 123 of Official Records,
Image 272 (AR 79980) , Records of Alameda County, California;
thence from said point in a general easterly direction along
said boundary line dividing Alameda County from Contra Costa
County; to the intersection thereof with the general
northwesterly line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to
East Bay Regional Park District by Quitclaim Deed recorded
April 5, 1973 in Reel 3382 of Official Records, at Image 477
(73-44684 ) Records of Alameda County, California; thence in a
general southerly direction, along the easterly line (73-44684)
to the intersection thereof with the northeastern corner of
that certain Record .of Survey No. 385, filed October 28 , 1970
in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at pages 27 through 29
inclusive (70-118.534) Records of Alameda County, California;
thence in a general southerly direction along the easterly line
(70-118534) to an angle point on the general northerly
boundary line of that certain territory annexed to the City of
Pleasanton by Pleasanton City Council Ordinance No. 646 ,
adopted November 8, 1971, a map of which was filed December 10,
1971 in Map Book 73 at Page 7 (71-162868) Records of Al_ ameda
County, California; thence southerly and westerly along said
general northerly boundary line (71-162868) to the intersection
thereof with the northerly boundary line of that certain
territory annexed to the City of Pleasanton by Pleasanton City
Council Ordinance No. 803, adopted February 14, 1977, a map of
which was filed August 9 , 1977 in Map Book 90 at Page 18 (77-
158324) Records of Alameda County, California; thence westerly
along said northerly boundary line (77-158324 ) to the
intersection thereof with the northerly boundary line of that
certain territory annexed to the City of Pleasanton by
Pleasanton City Council Ordinance No. 523, a map of which was
filed September 30 , 1968 in Map book 51 at Page 94 (BA 107054)
Records of Alameda County, California; thence westerly along
said northerly line (BA 107054) to the intersection thereof
with the general northeasterly boundary line of that certain
territory annexed to Park Community Service District, formerly
Valley Community Services District, now known as Dublin San
Ramon Services District, said District being established under
Resolution No. 66153 of the Board of Supervisors of Alameda
County, California, adopted March 24, 1953 and filed in Minute
Book 91 at Page 555 thereof; thence leaving the City of
Pleasanton boundary line northwesterly along said general
northeasterly boundary line of said Parks Community Service
District to the intersection thereof with the general southerly
boundary line of that certain territory known as Dublin
Annexation No. 10 , annexed to Dublin San Ramon Services
District by District Resolution No.62-81, adopted October 20,
1981, a Certificate of Completion was recorded November 6, 1981
Exhibit A
11/05/85
Page 3
under Series No. 81-1888981 Records of Alameda County,
California; thence northwesterly, northeasterly and easterly
along said general southerly boundary line (81--188898) to the
intersection thereof with the general easterly boundary line of
said Dublin Annexation No. 10; thence in a general northerly
direction along said general easterly boundary line to the
intersection thereof with aforesaid general easterly boundary
line of Volk-Mclain Annexation (AR 79980) ; thence in a general
northerly easterly and northerly direction along said general
easterly boundary line of Volk-Mclain Annexation to the point
of beginning.
1 �
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
------------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING "CITY OF DUBLIN ANNEXATION
#2 - PUBLIC LANDS (CAMP PARKS ) "
WHEREAS, the Dublin City Council has initiated the
annexation of certain inhabited territory designated as "City of
Dublin Annexation #2 - Public Lands (Camp Parks) "; and
WHEREAS, LAFCO has, at the times, in the form, and in
the manner provided by law, considered the petition of the City;
and
WHEREAS, LAFCO has authorized the City to proceed with
the annexation by LAFCO, and has approved the annexation subject
to the following terms and conditions:
a) Correction of the map and description as may be required by
the Director of Public -Works, ex-officio County Surveyor; and
b) Designate the City of Dublin as the conducting authority and
authorize the City to initiate proceedings for the proposed
annexation in compliance with this resolution.
c) The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission -
recommends that the City of Dublin study the Property to
determine if there are areas within the Property which may be
benefited by the Freeway Improvements and if such benefits
are found, to support the creation of an assessment district
or similar vehicle for the financing of the cost of
construction of that portion of the Freeway Improvements which
confer special benefits on areas within the Property.
d) The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission further
recommends that the City of Dublin participate jointly with
the City of Pleasanton and any other public agencies having
jurisdiction within the Property in formation of a joint
powers or other special purpose entity or commission, for the
purpose of defining a "scope of work" for the Freeway
Improvements, determining the cost thereof, and retaining .-an
"engineer of work" to determine the boundaries of the
Benefited area. The object of the City of Dublin' s
participation with other public agencies shall be to attain an
official determination of the extent of improvements, cost of
improvements, and proportion of costs to be borne by the
Benefited Area.
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was duly given in
accordance with law; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing at 7: 30 p.m. ,
October 13, 1986, at the City Council' s regular meeting place, to
consider testimony concerning the proposed annexation; and
ATTAU44elmtl
WHEREAS, all oral and written protests, objections and
evidence were considered by the City Council;
WHEREAS, after closing the public hearing, it was
determined that written protests. filed .and not withdrawn are
represented by 50% or more of the voting .power of voters entitled
to vote.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City .
Council does hereby find that:
Section 1. That pursuant to the .provisions of the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Government Code H 56000 et seq. , and in particular, Section 57078,
the Council terminates the annexation proceedings of that real
property situated in the County of Alameda, -.-State -of :California
(designated as "City of Dublin Annexation #2 - Public Lands (Camp
Parks) ") and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2 . That the City Clerk is directed to send a
certified copy of this resolution to the LAFCO Executive Officer.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of
1986.
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
... :� r- x y •�yz tif .u,1( wa��r�e �3zy �•"r{�fruy ...
3., .. F _
November 1, 1985
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ANNEX
TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN
All that certain real property situated in the counties of
Contra Costa and Alameda, State of California, described as
follows :
A PORTION of the 3636.1222 acre tract of land commonly
known as Camp Parks Military Reservation, acquired by the
United States of America, by Decree of Final Condemnation, made
by the- District Court of the United States for the Northern -
District of California, Southern Division, Case Number 22352-R,
a certified copy of .which was recorded August 1, 1947, in Book
5132 of Official Records, page 1 (AB 65698) Records of Alameda
County, California, described as follows :
BEGINNING at a point on the boundary line dividing Alameda
County from Contra Costa . County, said "boundary line was
established by that certain "REPORT ON A JOINT RETRACEMENT
SURVEY AND MONUMENTATION OF A PORTION OF THE BOUNDARY LINE
BETWEEN .ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES - 1960" approved by
the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County under Resolution No.
99517, adopted February 27, 1962 and filed in Reel 1 of
Minutes, Image 966, said point being the intersection with the
centerline of County Road No. 4038, commonly known as Dougherty -
Road, 50 feet in width, as said centerline is described in that
certain AMENDED JUDGMENT, Case No. 22352-R; IN THE DISTRICT
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN AND FQR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
THE CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff v. 3396 Acres of land, Alameda and Contra Costa
Counties, California, et al, Defendants, done in open court on
June 4, 1945, a certified copy of which was recorded June 8 ,
1945 , in Book 4721 of Official Records, page 14, Records of
Alameda County, California, said centerline being in common
with the general westerly boundary of said Camp Parks Military
Reservation and coterminous with the general easterly boundary
line of that certain territory, known as Volk-McLain Company
Annexation, annexed to Parks Community Services District now
known as Dublin San Ramon Services District, said boundary
being established under Ordinance No. 1 of Parks Community
Exhibit A
11/05/85
Page 2
Services District now known as Dublin San Ramon Services
District, said boundary being established under Ordinance No. 1
of Parks Community Services District, a certified copy of which
was recorded July 11, 1960 , in Reel 123 of Official Records,
Image 272 (AR 79980) , Records of Alameda County, California;
thence from said point in a general easterly direction along
said boundary line dividing Alameda County from Contra Costa
County; to the intersection thereof with the general
northwesterly line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to
East Bay Regional Park District by Quitclaim Deed recorded
April 5, 1973 in Reel 3382 of Official Records, at Image 477
(73-44684) Records of Alameda County, California; thence in a
general southerly direction, along the easterly line (73-44684)
to the intersection thereof with the northeastern corner of
that certain Record .of Survey No. 385, filed October 28 , 1970
in Book 8 of Records of Surveys at pages 27 through 29
inclusive (70-118.534) Records of Alameda County, California;
thence in a general southerly direction along the easterly line
(70-118534) to an angle point on the general northerly
boundary line of that certain territory annexed to the City of
Pleasanton by Pleasanton City Council Ordinance No. 646 ,
adopted November 8, 1971, a map of which was filed December 10,
1971 in Map Book 73 at Page 7 (71-162868) Records of Alameda
County, California; thence southerly and westerly along said
general northerly boundary line (71-162868) to the intersection
thereof with the northerly boundary line of that certain
territory annexed to the City of Pleasanton by Pleasanton City
Council Ordinance No. 803, adopted February 14, 1977, a map of
which was filed August 9 , 1977 in Map Book 90 at Page 18 (77-
158324) Records of Alameda County, California; thence westerly
along said northerly boundary line (77-158324 ) to the
intersection thereof with the northerly boundary line of that
certain territory annexed to the City of Pleasanton by
Pleasanton City Council Ordinance No. 523, a map of which was
filed September 30, 1968 in Map book 51 at Page 94 (BA 107054)
Records of Alameda County, California; thence westerly along
said northerly line (BA 107054) to the intersection thereof
with the general northeasterly boundary line of that certain
territory annexed to Park Community Service District, formerly
Valley Community Services District, now known as Dublin San
Ramon Services District, said District being established under
Resolution No. 66153 of the Board of Supervisors of Alameda
County, California, adopted March 24, 1953 and filed in Minute
Book 91 at Page 555 thereof; thence leaving the City of
Pleasanton boundary line northwesterly along said general
northeasterly boundary line of said Parks Community Service
District to the intersection thereof with the general southerly
boundary line of that certain territory known as Dublin
Annexation No. 10 , annexed to Dublin San Ramon Services
District by District Resolution No.62-81, adopted October 20,
1981, a Certificate of Completion was recorded November 6, 1981
r
Exhibit A
11/05/85
Page 3
under Series No. 81-188898 , Records of Alameda County,
California; thence northwesterly, northeasterly and easterly
along said general southerly boundary line (81--188898) to the
intersection thereof with the general easterly boundary line of
said Dublin Annexation No. 10; thence in a general northerly
direction along said. general easterly boundary line to the
intersection thereof with aforesaid general easterly boundary
line of Volk-Mclain Annexation . (AR 79980); thence in a general
northerly easterly and northerly direction along said general
easterly boundary line of Volk-Mclain Annexation to the point
of' beginning.
Approved as to Form:
Gladys Houston, Nputy County Counsel
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
RESOLUTION NO. 86-23
WHEREAS, a resolution of application for the City of Dublin
Annexation No. 2 - Public Lands (Camp Parks) was heretofore filed with the
Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and
WHEREAS, said Executive Officer has reviewed said application and
prepared a report, including his recommendations thereon; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report (City of Dublin General
Plan, Draft Environmental Impact Report, February 8, 1984; Responses to
Comments, Draft Environmental Impact Report, Dublin General Plan, March 30,
1984; City of Dublin General Plan, Supplement to Environmental Impact Report,
December 21 , 1984; and City of Dublin General Plan, Responses to Comments on
Supplement to Environmental impact Report, City Council Meeting of February
11, 1985) has been prepared on this project in accordinace with the California
Environmental Quality Act, and said EIR:
1 . Has been reviewed and considered by the -Local Agency Formation
Commission;
2. Is hereby certified by this Local Agency Formation Commission to
comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act and all applicable State and County guidelines; and
3. Is hereby adopted as the EIR for this Commission action; and
WHEREAS, the above noted EIR does not indicate any significant
impacts of the project which are within the responsibility of this Commission;
and
WHEREAS, a number of significant measurable and unmeasurable
impacts of the project were identified in the EIR and are the responsibility
of the Lead Agency (City of Dublin) ; and
WHEREAS, the area is within the sphere of influence of the City of
Dublin and not within an agricultural preserve; and
WHEREAS, at the hearing on September 11, 1986, the Local Agency
Formation Commission heard and received all oral and written protests,
objections and evidence which were made, presented or filed, and all persons
present were given an opportunity to appear and be heard in respect to any
matter relating to said application and report;
A"'hHMENT,
-2-
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has recognized
in Section 56001 of the Act that urban population densities and intensive
residential , commercial ,and industrial development necessitate a broad
spectrum and high level of community services and controls, and that when
areas become urbanized to the extent that they need the full range of
community services, service priorities need to be established by weighing the
total community needs against the total financial resources available for
securing community services, and that those community service priorities are
required to reflect local circumstances, conditions, and limited financial
resources; and
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Alameda County Local Agency
Formation Commission to exercise its powers pursuant to the Act in a manner
that encourages and provides planned, well-ordered, efficient urban
development patterns with appropriate consideration of discouraging urban
sprawl , and providing for the orderly development of local agencies with a
recognition of local conditions and circumstances; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission
believes that there may be a benefit to certain areas within the Property and
other areas outside the Property by reason of the construction of certain
proposed major roadway and freeway interchanges ("Freeway Improvements")
adjacent to Interstate 580 at Hopyard Road,. Santa Rita Road, Hacienda Drive,
and the auxiliary lanes, between Hacienda Drive and the Interstate 680/580
intersection,
WHEREAS, this Commission did find as follows:
1 . The proposed annexation is consistent with the procedures and
policies previously adopted by the Commission;
2. The proposed annexation is inhabited;
3. The annexation will permit the provision of municipal services
by the City of Dublin to the subject area; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED THAT:
The City of Dublin Annexation #2 - Public Lands (Camp Parks) be approved
subject to the following terms:
1 . Correction of the map and description as may be required by
the Director of Public Works, ex-officio County Surveyor; and
2. Designate the City of Dublin as the conducting authority and
authorize the City to initiate proceedings for the proposed
annexation in compliance with this resolution.
-3-
3. The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission
recommends that the City of Dublin study the Property to
determine if there are areas within the Property which may be
benefitted by the Freeway Improvements and if such benefits
are found, to support the creation of an assessment district
or similar vehicle for the financing of the cost of
construction of that portion of the Freeway Improvements which
confer special benefits on areas within the Property.
4. The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission further
recommends that the City of Dublin participate jointly with
the City of Pleasanton and any other public agencies having
jurisdiction within the Property in formation of a joint
powers or other special purpose entity or commission, for the
purpose of defining a "scope of work" for the Freeway
Improvements, determining the cost thereof, and retaining an
"engineer of work" to determine the boundaries of the
Benefitted area. The object of the City of Dublin's
participation with other public agencies shall be to attain an
official determination of the extent of improvemnts, cost of
improvements, and proportion of costs to be borne by the
Benef i tted Area.
1 CERTIFY THAT
OF AF-O RESOLUTION
ON
CORRECT ,.-�..�TI Fn
DOpTED 6Y THE ALA P;.ED
_ C 1986 -
I V CAS 1 C,1 '�IA -
ATT'-ST �'
LCUTIVE FF��
h«� l��i� '- -
BY: % RU CE KERN,LAFCO Staff
17561