Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.2 Regulate Traffic Arroyo Vista CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT City Council Meeting Date: February 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Arroyo Vista - Regulation of Vehicular Traffic EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Resolution 2) Request from Housing Authority 3) Reports from TJKM RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing. 2) Receive Staff presentation and public testimony. 3) Question Staff and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt resolution regulating vehicular traffic within Arroyo Vista. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Cost of new signing would be approximately $1,000. DESCRIPTION: The streets within the Arroyo Vista Housing Development, now operated by the Dublin Housing Authority, are private streets; therefore, the State Vehicle Code regulations have not been enforced within the development. State Vehicle Code Section 21107.5 permits traffic enforcement on private streets when the following conditions are met: 1) The roadway is generally open for public use. 2) The subject street connects with highways such that it cannot be distinguished from a public road. In order to make these findings, the City must hold a public hearing to receive testimony and determine whether the California Vehicle Code provisions can be applied to the streets within Arroyo Vista, which are as follows: North Mariposa, South Mariposa, Ventura Drive, and Monterey Drive. If this resolution is adopted, the prima facie 25 m.p.h. speed limit in a residential neighborhood, as well as other traffic regulations, can be enforced. Ophelia Basgal, Executive Director of the Dublin Housing Authority, has submitted a written request that the City pursue the possibility of enforcing the Vehicle Code within Arroyo Vista per the provisions of Section 21107.5. TJKM has reviewed the existing regulatory signage within the development and made recommendations as follows: - To retain the STOP signs at their present locations. - To install 25 m.p.h. speed limit signs, as well as 15 m.p.h. advisory signs at sharp curves. TJKM has also performed a speed survey within Arroyo Vista and submitted the attached report. The 85th percentile speeds on Ventura and Monterey Drives ranged from 25 to 28 m.p.h. Speeds ranged from 17 to 31 m.p.h. It is Staff's position that both the required findings can be met; therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt this resolution regulating vehicular traffic within Arroyo Vista. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM NO. COPIES TO: Ophelia Basgal Arroyo Vista Offices 0 RESOLUTION NO. -87. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REGULATING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC WITHIN ARROYO VISTA PURSUANT TO SECTION 21107.5 OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE WHEREAS, 10 days' written notice was given to the Dublin Housing Authority that a hearing would be held to consider declaration that streets within Arroyo Vista are generally ppen to the public and so connect with Dougherty Road that the public cannot determine that said streets are private streets; and WHEREAS, on February 23, 1987, the City Council held a public hearing and took testimony from interested persons on said issue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby finds and declares that North Mariposa, South Mariposa, Ventura Drive, and Monterey Drive, which are private streets, are generally held open for the use of the public for vehicular travel, and so connect with said Dougherty Road that the public cannot determine that said streets are not public streets. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution is adopted pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21107.5 for the purposes of making the provisions of the California Vehicle Code applicable to said streets within Arroyo Vista. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of February, 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk e Fes: AUTHOIIRTY OF HOUSINGALAMEDA COUNTY 10110 December 24, 1986 : .. C � iVCU Mr. Richard Ambrose D^v 1 City Manager City of Dublin P.O. Box 2340 ' Dublin, CA 94568 Dear Richard: There have been some recent reports of speeding and other vehicle code infractions on Arroyo Vista's private streets. The City Police Department has advised that unless §21107.5 of the Vehicle Code is enacted by the City, they cannot enforce the Vehicle Code on private streets. The Dublin Housing Authority Commission would like to request that the City Engineer review the possibility of enacting §21107.5 for the Arroyo Vista Complex. If any specific information is required of the Housing Authority to address this request, please let me know. . Thanks for your assistance. Very truly yours, \��- S7 �rri T. Oph lia B. Basgal` Executive Director \� OB:md N!;�. 1 ci 29800 MISSION BOULEVARD • HAYWARD,CALIFORNIA 94544 • (415) 538-8876 4637 Chabot Drive,Suite 214 Pleasanton Ca. 94566 (415)463-0611 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 7, 1987 TO: Lee Thompson, City Engineer FROM: Ty Tekawa SUBJECT: Arroyo Vista Traffic Controls As directed by you in a letter to me dated June 23, 1986, I met with the Pleasanton Housing Authority several months ago to assist them in placing several speed limit and STOP signs. The signs are in place and are at locations that were mutually agreed to by the authority and me. The Housing Authority felt strongly that 15 mph signs were appropriate for their interior streets. Since they are private streets, these signs were placed by the Authority. Should Arroyo Vista streets become public, the 15 mph signs may be inappropriate for enforcement purposes. Signs reading 25 mph with supplemental 15 mph advisory signs at critical locations may be more appropriate. This should be confirmed by radar speed surveys. In my opinion, the STOP signs which have been installed should remain because of the unusual geometrics and the need to provide good pedestrian access from residences to Authority offices. rhm cc: ' Chris Kinzel Michelle DeRobertis 157-001 Y' PLEASANTON•SACRAMENTO•FRESNO•CONCORD 4637 Chabot Drive,Suite 214 i Pleasanton Ca. 94566 (415)463-0611 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 17, 1987 TO: Lee Thompson, City Engineer FROM: T. Ty Tekawa SUBJECT: Speed Study in Arroyo Vista - Ventura Drive and Monterey Drive Arroyo Vista is a private development maintained by the Dublin Housing Authority. Special procedures must be taken to allow the enforcement of the Vehicle Code. Since Ventura Drive and Monterey Drive are private roads in Arroyo Vista, provisions of the vehicle code do not apply unless the City declares by ordinance or resolution that the provisions of the vehicle code do apply. The Vehicle Code states that the ordinance or resolution cannot be enacted unless a public hearing is held and 10 days prior written notice is given to the owner of the private road (Vehicle Code Section 21107:5). Since Ventura Drive and Monterey Drive are presently private streets, they have been posted by the owner (the Housing Authority) for 15 mph speed limit with no traffic study. This posted limit cannot be enforced as stated in the previous paragraph. TJKM has completed a radar speed study to determine the appropriate speed limit for the streets within Arroyo Vista. Our spot speed analysis summaries are attached. Also attached is an explanation of the criteria for setting speed limits. Although both Ventura Drive and Monterey Drive which are both 36 feet wide, appear to fit the description for a local street with a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph, the speed survey was conducted to verify that speed limit. The 85th percentile speeds on the two streets ranged from 25 to 28 mph. Speeds ranged from a low of 17 mph to high of 31 mph. Based on this range of speeds, all traffic was over the posted 15 mph speed limit. TJKM recommends the speed limit be posted at 25 mph. This speed is near the high portion of the 10 mph pace (the 10 mph range at which most cars were driven), and appropriate for the area. W3, curve warning signs with W6(15) advisory speed plates should be installed in advance of all sharp curves. When the City Council adopts an ordinance and goes through the public hearing process to allow the Vehicle Code to be enforced, 25 mph signs and the curve warning signs should be posted. rah Attachments 157-001 PLEASANTON•SACRAMENTO•FRESNO•CONCORD CITY OF DUBLIN CRITERIA FOR SETTING SPEED LIMITS Chapter 7 of Division 11 of the State of California Vehicle Code deals with speed laws. Basically, it indicates that prima facie speed limits on roadways are 25 miles per hour (mph) in residential and business districts and 15 mph at railroad grade crossings and highway intersections with sight restrictions and on any alley. Section 22348 currently sets the maximum speed limit at 55 mph. The Code also allows for intermediate speed limits. In Section 22357, it indicates that a city "... upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe... may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55... whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe." Similarly, Section 22358 allows cities to reduce,Iby ordinance, those sections that are automatically the maximum limit to limits as low as 25 mph on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey and the determination that the resulting speeds will be reasonable and safe. The engineering and traffic survey is defined in Section 627 of the Code as being a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by State and local authorities. In the engineering and traffic survey, consideration must be made for prevailing speeds, accident records, highway traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. In October, 1974, the State of California published in the Traffic Manual three methods of conducting an engineering and traffic survey which are appropriate for California streets of differing function: State Highways City and County Through Highways, Arterials, and Collector Roads Local Streets Recommendations contained in this publication have been used in the speed study. In addition to the above requirements, Section 40802, "Speed Trap" of the Vehicle Code indicates that radar cannot be used to enforce speed limits unless justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within the last five years. Speed -1- limits must be updat,_ at least every five years and engineering and traffic surveys must be conducted and considered by the City Council prior to the adoption of resolution changing any speed limits if the City wishes to continue to use radar for enforcement purposes. Section 40802 also provides that speed trap provisions do not apply to local streets and roads. This latter legislation shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1991, and as of that date is repealed. Local streets and roads are those designated on the latest functional usage and federal aid system maps, as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definition applies: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions: 1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. 2. Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. 3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. This report and the procedures used to formulate its recommendations fully meet the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the California Department of Transportation and will allow the Police Department of the City of Newark to continue to enforce speed limits by the use of radar following the adoption of specific speed limit changes recommended by this report (or modified as deemed necessary by the City Council) and the installation of appropriate speed limit signs. Realistic Speed Zoning The Automobile Club of Southern California has published a booklet, "Realistic Speed Zoning -- Why and How?" The information excerpted below is especially pertinent to this speed zone study and is included in this report for informational purposes: Most citizens can be relied upon to behave in a reasonable manner as they go about their daily activities. Many of our laws reflect observations of the way reasonable people behave under most circumstances. Traffic regulations are also based upon observations of the behavior of groups of motorists under various conditions. Generally speaking, traffic laws that -2- reflect the beha. of The majority of motorists are fou..- to be successful. Laws that arbitrarily restrict the majority of drivers encourage wholesale violations, lack public support and usually fail to bring about desirable changes in driving behavior. This is especially true of speed zoning. Speed zoning is based upon several fundamental concepts deeply rooted in our American system of government and law: - Driving behavior is an extension of social attitude, and the majority of drivers respond in a safe and reasonable manner as demonstrated by their consistently favorable driving records. - The normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable person should be considered legal. - Laws are established for the protection of the public and the regulation of unreasonable behavior of the individual. - Laws cannot be effectively enforced without the consent and voluntary . compliance of the public majority. Public acceptance of these precepts is normally instinctive. However, the same public, when emotionally aroused in a specific instance, will invariably reject these fundamentals and rely instead on more comfortable and widely held misconceptions, such as: - Speed limit signs will slow the speed of traffic. - Speed limit signs will decrease the accident rate and increase safety. - Raising a posted speed limit will cause an increase in the speed of traffic. - Any posted speed limit must be safer than an unposted speed limit regardless of traffic and roadway conditions prevailing. Before-and-after studies consistently demonstrate that there are no significant changes in traffic speeds following the posting of new or revised speed limits. Furthermore, no published research findings have established any direct relationship between posted speed limits and accident frequency, although short-term reductions have resulted from saturation enforcement efforts directed at speed and other traffic law violations. Police agencies necessarily rely on reasonable and well recognized speed laws to control the unreasonable violator whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic. -3- Why Are Realistic Speed Zones Desirable? Realistic speed zones are of public importance for a variety of reasons: - They satisfy the requirements of the state law for establishing prima facie speed limits on public streets and highways. - They invite public compliance by conforming to the behavior of the majority and by giving a clear reminder to non-conforming violators. - They offer an effective enforcement tool to the police by clearly separating the occasional violator from the reasonable majority. - The tend to minimize current , They public antagonism toward police enforcement of obviously unreasonable regulations. - They inject an element of logic and reason into an otherwise arbitrary and often emotional issue. - They correctly serve to place responsibility for justifying so-called "tolerances" upon those administrative agencies that grant them. - They lend credence and acceptability to the widely posted admonition, "Speed Laws Strictly Enforced," at many city boundaries. -4- SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF DUBLIN LOCATION MONTEREY DR. 5001S/0 S. SD DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL DIRECTION NORTHBOUND 50th PERCENTILE SPEED 23 DAY OF THE WEEK FRIDAY 85th PERCENTILE SPEED 27 DATE 1/30/87 10 MPH PACE SPEED 17 TO 26 TIME OF THE DAY 5:40-12:05 PM PERCENT IN PACE SPEED 77 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 RANGE OF SPEEDS 17 TO 35 VEHICLES OBSERVED 27 SKEWNESS INDEX 1. 08 CUMULATIVE SPEED CURVE SPEED NUM- PERCNT. CUMUL. (MPH) BER OF TOT. PRCNT. 1Q10'/. a,paa,paaoaaa----, 17 4 14. 81 14. 81 I I i lao i I I t 18 1 3. 70 18. 52 19 1 3. 70 22. 22 I I I oo I 1 I I 20 Qi 0. 00 22. 22 90'/. 21 Qi 0. 00 22. 22 I I I o ! I t I I 22 5 18. 52 40. 74 I I t o f 1 I t I 23 4 14. 81 55. 56 24 3 11. 11 66. 67 80% 1 -1-1 -++►-I I I I I 25 1 3. 70 70. 37 1 1 1 o f I I I I 26 2 7. 41 77. 78 1 1 1 0 l I I I I 27 4 14. 81 92. 59 1 1 1 0 l 1 I t I 28 0 0. 00 92. 59 70% 1-1 -1 29 0 0. 00 92. 59 1 1 1 30 1 3. 70 96. 30 1 1 1 a I I I t I 31 0 0. 00 96. 30 1 1 1 a I I ! I I 32 0 0. 00 96. 30 60% I 1 33 0 0. 00 96. 30 1 1 l a I I I I I 34 0 0. 00 96. 30 1 1 t o I I 1 I I 35 1 3. 70 100. 00 1 36 0 0. 00 100. 00 50% 37 0 0. 00 100. 00 38 0 0. 00 100. 00 ! 1 I a I I I t I 39 0 0. 00 100. 00 40 0 0. 00 100. 00 40'/. I 1 t o I I I I ! 41 0 0. 00 100. 00 t I t o I I I I I 42 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I t o I t I I I 43 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I t o I I I I I 44 0 0. 00 100. 00 30% 45 0 0. 00 100. 00 I 1 t o I I I I I 46 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I l a I I I I I 47 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I oa I 1 I i i 48 0 0. 00 100. 00 20% 1-1 49 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I a l I I I t I 50 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 ! a l I f I I I 51 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I a l I I r 1 I 52 0 0. 00 100. 00 10% 1-1 J3 Qi 0. 00 100. 00 54 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I a l I I I I I 55 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I a l I I t I I 56 0 0. 00 i 00. 00 0% -oa0000ao 57 0 0. 00 100. 00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SPEED (MPH) SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF DUBLIN MUIPOSA LOCATION MONTEREY DR. 5001S/O S. T==W D DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL DIRECTION SOUTHBOUND 50th PERCENTILE SPEED 26 DAY OF THE WEEK FRIDAY 85th PERCENTILE SPEED 28 DATE 1/30/87 10 MPH PACE SPEED 21 TO 30 TIME OF THE DAY 9:40-12:05 PM PERCENT IN PACE SPEED 92 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 RANGE OF SPEEDS 17 TO 30 VEHICLES OBSERVED 25 SKEWNESS INDEX 0. 55 CUMULATIVE SPEED CURVE SPEED NUM- PERCNT. CUMUL. (MPH) BER OF TOT. PRCNT. 100% aaaaaaaaaaaaa----, 17 1 4. 00 4. 00 18 1 4. 00 8. 00 1 I I a t I I I 19 0 0. 00 8. 00 1 I I a l I I t 1 20 0 0. 00 8. 00 90% 1 21 1 4. 00 12. 00 1 i I 01 I I t I 22 1 4. 00 16. 00 1 I I *1 I I I I 23 2 8. 00 24. 00 1 I I a l I I I I 24 1 4. 00 28. 00 80'/. 25 5 20. 00 48. 00 I I I a l I I 1 I 26 7 28. t4)0 76. 00 27 2 8. 00 84. 00 28 1 4. 00 88. 00 70% 1 I 1 - 29 2 8. 00 96. 00 1 t 30 1 4. 00 100. 00 1 1 J a { I I I 1 31 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I I a l I I I I 32 0 0. 00 100. 00 60/ 1 -1-1 33 0 0. 00 100. 00 34 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I I a l I I I 1 35 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I I a l J I I I 36 0 0. 00 100. 00 50:/• 1-1 -1 37 0 0. 00 100. 1410 I I I a l 1 I I I 38 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I I a 1 I I 1 I 39 vi 0. 1410 100. 00 I I t o t I I 1 I 40 0 0. 00 100. 00 40'/. I 1 1-*-I I 1 t I 41 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I l a I I I I I 42 0 0. 00 100. 00 i 43 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 I t 44 0 0. 00 100. 00 30% I I 1-a-1 1 I ! I 45 0 0. 00 11210. 00 I I l a I I J 1 I 46 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I l a I I I I 47 0 0. 00 100. 00 48 0 0. 00 100. 00 20% I I t o I 1 I I I 49 ¢i 0. 00 100. 00 50 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I I • 1 I I I 1 51 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I J a I I I I I 52 Qi, 0. 00 100. 00 10X 1-1 53 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I a I t I I J 54 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I • I I i I I I 55 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 56 0 0. 00 100. 00 0% Laaaaaeaa ' 57 0 0. 00 100. 00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SPEED (MPH) r 2n - SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF DUBLIN M>�1 PoS� LOCATION VENTURA DR. 4001N/O VFPPPP DR. DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL DIRECTION NORTHBOUND 50th PERCENTILE SPEED 22 DAY OF THE WEEK FRIDAY 85th PERCENTILE SPEED 28 DATE 1/30/87 10 MPH PACE SPEED 17 TO 26 TIME OF THE DAY 1 :20-4:20 PM PERCENT IN PACE SPEED 77 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 RANGE OF SPEEDS 17 TO 31 VEHICLES OBSERVED 9 SKEWNESS INDEX 1. 29 CUMULATIVE SPEED CURVE SPEED NUM- PERCNT. CUMUL. (MPH) BER OF TOT. PRCNT. 100'/. 0000000000000--� 17 1 11. 11 11. 11 18 0 0. 00 11. 11 I I 1 0 I I f I 19 0 0. 00 11. 11 20 0 0. 00 11. 11 90.7. 21 2 22. 22 33. 33 1 1 1 01 1 I I I 22 2 22. 22 55. 56 •1 1 1 0 1 1 I I I 23 0 0. 00 55. 56 1 1 I 01 I t I I 24 1 i i. 11* 66. 67 80% 1 -1 -1 1 I I I t 25 0 0. 00 66. 67 1 t 1 0 t I I I I 26 1 11. 1 1 77. 78 1 1 1 0 1 t I t I 27 0 0. 00 77. 78 1 t 1 0 1 I t I t 28 1 11. 11 88. 89 70% 1 -1-1 29 0 0. 00 88. 89 1 1 1 0 1 I I f 1 30 0 0. 00 88. 89 1 1 f 31 1 11. 11 100. 00 1 I 10 I I 1 I I 32 0 0. 00 100. 00 60.7. 1 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 34 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 10 I t I I t 35 Qi 0. 00 100. 00 I I l0 i 1 1 1 I 36 0 0. 00 100. 00 50% t t l0 I I I I I 37 0 0. 00 100. 00 38 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I l0 I t I I I 39 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I I • I I I I I 40 0 0. 00 100. 00 40% I I l0 t I i I I 41 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I 10 I I I I I 42 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I 10 1 I I I I 43 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I 10 1 I I I I 44 0 0. 00 100. 00 30% 1-1 45 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 0 I I I I I 46 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 0 I t 1 I I 47 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 0 1 I I I 1 48 0 0. 00 100. 00 20% I 1 49 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 0 I I 1 I t 50 izi 0. 00 100. 00 I t 0 I I I I I 51 0 0. 00 100. 00 52 0. 0. 00 100. 00 10% 1 -1 53 Qi 0. 00 100. 00 1 I 0 1 I I I 1 I 54 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 55 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 t 0 1 I I t I I 56 0 0. 00 100. 00 0/ L-00000000- 57 0 0. 00 100. 00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SPEED (MPH) SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF DUBLIN M A NSA LOCATION VENTURA DR. 400 1N/O DR. DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL DIRECTION SOUTHBOUND 50th PERCENTILE SPEED 2.3 DAY OF THE WEEK FRIDAY 85th PERCENTILE SPEED 25 DATE 1/30/87 10 MPH PACE SPEED 17 TO 26 TIME OF THE DAY 1 :20-4:20 PM PERCENT IN FACE SPEED 100 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 RANGE OF SPEEDS 17 TO 26 VEHICLES OBSERVED 22 SKEWNESS INDEX 0. 50 CUMULATIVE SPEED CURVE SPEED NUM- PERCNT. CUMUL. (MPH) BER OF TOT. PRCNT. 100-/- 0000000e0000000--� 17 2 9. 09 9. 1419 1 I I 0 1 I I I I 18 1 4. 55 13. 64 19 1 4. 55 18. 18 20 1 4. 55 22. 73 90% I I 1-*-I I I I 1 21 0 0. 00 22. 73 1 1 1 0 I I I I I 5 22. 73 45. 45 I 1 1 23 3 13. 64 59. 09 1 1 1 24 3 13. 64 72. 73 80'/- I ' I 1-O-I i I 1 1 25 5 22. 73 95. 45 I I 1 26 1 4. 55 100. 00 1 27 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 28 0 0. 00 100. 00 70% 1 1 29 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 30 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I l 0 1 I I I I 31 it 0. 00 100. 00 I 1 i 0 1 1 1 1 1 32 Qi 0. 00 100. 00 60Y. 33 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I l0 I I I I I 34 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I 10 35 0 0. 00 100. 00 I I 10 I 1 I 1 I 36 0 0. 00 100. 00 50-/. i I l0 I I I i i 37 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 10 I I I I I 38 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 10 39 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I 10 40 0 0. 00 100. 00 40-/- I I l0 I I I I I 41 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I 10 I I I I 1 42 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 I 10 1 I I I I 43 QI 0. 00 100. 00 1 I 10 1 I I I I 44 Qi 0. 00 100. 00 30'/. 45 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 I 46 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 I - 47 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 10 1 I I I I 48 0 0. 00 100. 00 20% 1-1 49 0 0. 00 100. 00 i I 0 I I I 1 I 50 0 0. 00 100. 00 i I 01 I 1 I I I 51 0 0. 00 100. 00 I 1 01 I I 1 I I 52 0 0. 00 100. 00 10% 1-1 53 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 0 1 I I I I I 54 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 0 1 1 I I 1 I 55 0 0. 00 100. 00 1 1 0 1 56 0 0. 00 100. 00 0% L00000000 57 0 0. 00 100. 00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SPEED (MPH)