Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.2 BART Park & Ride Project Neg Dec CITY OF DUBLIN 57O_ o AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 23, 1987 SUBJECT Negative Declaration for BART Park & Ride Project, Dublin - Pleasanton EXHIBITS ATTACHED 1. Preliminary Site Landscaping Plan, dated March 9, 1987 (sent under separate cover) 2. Negative Declaration for BART Park & Ride Project, Dublin - Pleasanton (sent under separate cover) 3. Estimated Implementation Costs from Draft Dublin Downtown Specific Plan 4. Notice Regarding Negative Declaration 5. February 23, 1987, Agenda Statement 1 RECOMMENDATION Direct Staff to forward the attached comments to BART, with any appropriate revisions. FINANCIAL STATEMENT To be determined. DESCRIPTION On February 23, 1987, the City Council reviewed its comments to BART regarding the Negative Declaration for the Park & Ride Project. The comments were itemized in a November 25, 1986, letter to BART and mitigation measures needed to avoid significant adverse impacts were identified. The mitigation measures were listed in three categories: A. Land Use B. Traffic C. Design Since February 23, BART has prepared a revised Negative Declaration including a re-designed facility and an additional traffic study. The BART responses to the mitigation measures are summarized as follows: A. Land Use: On Page 2-26, the Negative Declaration states that pursuant to the Dublin General Plan, BART intends to enter into a cooperative agreement with the City which develops standards for review of public and private improvements in the vicinity of the Dublin site. Staff believes that BART is making as much of a public commitment as possible to ensure that there will be a mix of both BART uses and retail/commercial uses. B. Traffic: The re-designed plans show that BART will dedicate and develop the new collector street along the north side of the project parcel. To address potential overflow parking, on page 2-48, the Negative Declaration states that, when parking occupancy reaches 75%, BART will begin informing parkers of other available parking facilities and begin assessing the economic feasibility of constructing parking structures and/or constructing new park and ride projects in the area. Similar to the cooperative agreement commitment, Staff believes that, while BART is not guaranteeing there won't be an overflow parking problem, BART is making a public commitment to address potential overflow parking once the project reaches 75% occupancy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COPIES TO: Dublin Chamber of Commerce Richard Wenzel - BART Chris Kinzel Dave Burton Police Chief City Engineer ITEM NO. 74 Planning Department Regarding BART contributing its proportionate "fair" share toward traffic improvements to help mitigate incremental and cumulative traffic impacts, BART's responses are as follows: - (Page 2-28) In 2005, the project could have a potentially significant cumulative impact on the Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road intersection, although such impact is not likely to occur. - (Page 2-34) Planned traffic improvements have not been entirely funded and may not be funded by 1990 if the funds do not become available. - (Page 2-35) The 2005 traffic analysis assumes that a new I-680 interchange to Downtown Dublin will be in place. Staff notes that, while Caltrans is studying various alignments, such a new interchange has not been approved nor funded. - (Page 2-36) Table 2-6 regarding Projected Land Use in Dublin, Staff notes that the Table needs to be revised. - (Page 2-45) In 1990, in the worst case (Plan 3) , the project would generate 103 p.m. peak hour trips through the Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road intersection. This represents a 1.7% increase in 1990 traffic conditions over the 6212 p.m. peak hour trips without the project. In 2005, the project would increase the raffic at the Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road intersection by 2.4% (178 trips over the 7344 trips without the project) . The intersection would already be at Level of Service F. Staff believes that it would be reasonable and appropriate for BART to pay its "fair share" of planned, but unfunded, traffic improvements. Without funding, the planned traffic improvements would not be con- structed and the project would have a significant adverse impact by aggravating traffic at an intersection already over capacity. A formula could be developed to establish a fair share proportion of planned but unfunded traffic improvements. The proportions could be based on the incremental and cumulative traffic generated by projected land uses. For example, the Negative Declaration estimates that build-out of new developments in the Downtown area will generate approximately 1,550 p.m. peak hour trips through the Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road intersection. The Negative Declaration assumes 100%-build-out in 2005, and 33.3% build-out in 1990. The number of p.m. peak hour trips in 1990 would be approximately 515. The Negative Declaration estimates that, in 1990, under Plan 3, the BART project will generate 103 trips. This is 17% of the additional traffic (515 + 103 — 618) . If the cost of planned but unfunded traffic improvements (such as the Dublin Boulevard improvements and the San Ramon Road off-ramp improvements) amounts to $1,000,000 and the BART project generates 17% of the additional traffic in 1990, then BART should reasonably be responsible for 17% of $1,000,000 (or $170,000) in planned improvements. C. Design: The re-designed plans address most of the design concerns with two (2) exceptions: 1. Fencing: BART Staff has indicated that galvanized chainlink fencing is being considered instead of the vinyl clad chainlink fencing suggested by the City. Staff believes that the vinyl clad fencing would be more appropriate and attractive along the highly visible side of the site fronting on I-580 and the west side. Fencing should not be installed along Golden Gate Drive and the new collector street. -2- v',7 7 Y 3,' ;+k•,k ` R:i�+ ° ,. :. :. 1 �. _ `rs Y Yf 4 t T, } x z 2. Bridge Design: The City had indicated that pedestrian safety while on the bridge needed to be addressed, especially during evening and off-peak hours. That concern still needs to be addressed in detail by BART and by Dublin Police Services prior to finalizing the design of the bridge which would be longer than a football field (360 feet) . Staff recommends that the City Council direct Staff to forward comments as mitigation measures to be included in the Negative Declaration for the BART project. -3- TG x M7 r (+r m.� R'•' kJpT ;»i -«.q;T r Cry yy.. s< ua '� +,^'S ,.+* R. 1.*x."*'TM9m.W�rd '3•.rsw�ti•--4-'0 7 5_'s:k 7'/ i . • . .. .. + 4. nom. .. .. - . . '` } .� •` `•.. .�. _ .. Item 7.2 Exhibit No. 1 Missing Preliminary Site Landscaping Plan Dated March 9, 1987 Item 7.2 Exhibit No. 2 Missing Negative Declaration for BART Park. & Ride Project, Dublin - Pleasanton D.KA-FT . DUBLIN DOWNTOWN ESTIMATED IMPLEMENTATION COSTS �� .. TABLE .D .. 1. CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS A. Dublin Boulevard $1,400 ,000 . (Note 1) B. New Streets 1,400,000 (Note 2)� - C. . Traffic Signals . , . 470,000 (Note 3) D. San Ramon Road off-ramp improvements 500 .000 $3 ,770,000 2. URBAN DESIGN IMAGE IMPROVEMENTS . -'A.* San Ramon Road Landscape $ 100 ,000 (Note 4) B. Downtown Entries 110,000 C. Continuity Theme Elements 90400 D. Street Furniture " 501000 ' (Note .12) E. Public Signing Program 50,000 F. Project. Entries Pylons Program (Note 5) $ 400 ,000 (Note 11) 3. CENTRAL BLOCK IMPROVEMENTS (Note 6) 4. RESTAURANT ROW IMPROVEMENTS (Note 7) A. .-Curbs and Gutters $ 60,000 B. Landscaping 70 ,000 C. Crosswalks 50 ,000 D. Pedestrian Lighting 120,000 E. Entry Pylons 85 ,000 F.. Street Furniture 15 .000 $ 400 ,000 5. SPECIAL PROGRAMS A. Business License Program $ 0 (Note 8) B. Downtown Promotion Program 20 ,000 (Note 9) C. Parking Lot Landscaping Program (Note 5) D. Signing and Graphics Improvement Program 10 ,000 (Note 10) E. Downtown Beautification Awards Program _ (Note 5) $ 30 ,000 (Note 11) TOTAL PUBLIC SECTOR KNOWN COSTS $4,600 ,000 Less Amount Currently Allocated in the City' s Capital Improvement Program $1 .470 .000 TOTAL PUBLIC SECTOR FUNDS NEEDED $3,130 ,000 (Note 13) a .+f.!�RT.J'. ^:!`TT'+:T!p•lt1'+T•.:,T�!`wT'!"!'JJf�Cr,'r�,.nom^..�;."��1;^!!'T!'.!._ w.��•-iww�- +rZ+C'f.'►'T.!r.•.�+^q�!+^,T+ .r.'.ifwa-Tw-�s• �.- _ ESTIMATED IMPLEMENTATION COSTS NOTES 1. $900 ,000 of this amount is currently allocated in the City's !^` Capital Improvement Program. 2. ' New street south of and parallel to Dublin Blvd. All or part of the' cost of construction and/or right-of-way may be born by adjacent property owners. 3. $470 ,000 (total cost) is currently allocated in the City's Capital Improvement Program. 4 . $100 ,000 of this amount is currently allocated in the City's Capital Improvement Program. 5 . The cost of this program and the extent of public and private participation cannot yet be determined. 6. The extent of costs for this program is unknown and can only be estimated following meetings with property owners and the development of schematic plans and cost estimates. An initial assumption is that the City of Dublin's participation will be limited to coordination activities and perhaps the funding of an initial schematic plan to assist property owners in reaching agreement. Should the possibility of a public plaza or joint-use structure within the Central Block become a reality, the City would consider participation in construction and maintenance costs. 7. Restaurant Row Improvements are very preliminary in nature and are based upon conceptual plans. Estimate includes contingency factors as well as engineering and administration costs. 8 . The Business License Program would be self-supporting. 9. Downtown Promotion Program co'sts assume only costs for the initial six month start up and ordinance adoption phase. It assumes the cost of one employee and direct costs of mailings and printing. Office space, secretarial help and other support services are assumed to be provided by elements of the Steering Committee. Costs for the ongoing program would be self-supporting from proceeds of the AB 1693 District revenues. 10. Cost assumes the services of a qualified graphics and signing consultant for a six-month period. Amount of effort is estimated to average one full day per week. Actual time expenditures could be less depending upon business interest in the program. 11 . Total known cost excluding programs for which extent of public and private costs are unknown. 76 12. Covers only estimate to upgrade quality of bus shelters from transit authority standards. _ 13 . Other miscellaneous public sector costs will need to be _ covered but would normally fail within normal city budget categories. Examples include the traffic monitoring program, coordination with BART and the on-going dialogue with CALTRANS. 77 B A R T BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT R E C E I V E D 800 Madison Street MAR ►� °87 P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, CA 94604-2688 Telephone(415)464-6000 DUBLIN PLANNING DUBLIN-PLEASANTON PARR/RIDE PROJECT NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MARGARET K.PRYOR PRESIDENT BARCLAYSIMPSON The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District VICE-PRESIDENT proposes to adopt a Negative Delaration for the KEITH BERNARD proposed Dublin-Pleasanton Park/Ride Project located GENERAL MANAGER on two sites separated by Interstate 580 just west of the Interstate 680 interchange in eastern Alameda County. The adoption of a Negative Declaration for DIRECTORS the proposed Dublin-Pleasanton Park/Ride Project is based on the Initial Study which determined that the BARCLAYSIMPSON proposed project will not have a significant effect 1 ST DISTRICT on the environment and that the measures to address NELLO BIANCO potentially significant impacts have been included 2ND DISTRICT in the project. ARTHUR J.SHARTSIS 3RD DISTRICT A Negative Declaration was previously scheduled to MARGARET K.PRYOR be considered by the BART Board of Directors In 4TH DISTRICT early February. Additional analysis has been com- ROBERT S.ALLEN pleted on the proposed project and a revised Nega- STH DISTRICT tive Declaration (March, 1987 ) will now be JOHN GLENN considered by the BART Board Engineering and 6TH DISTRICT Operations Committee on Tuesday, March 24, 1987 at WILFRED T.USSERY 9: 00 AM in the Board Room located at 800 Madison 7TH DISTRICT Street in Oakland. It is expected that the Board ARLO HALE SMITH will take action on Thursday, March 26, 1987 at 9 : 00 8TH DISTRICT KWOOD AM in the same location. At these Board meetings, JOHN H.KIR 9TH DISTRICT D the opportunity will be offered for interested parties to provide public comment on the adoption of a Negative Declaration. Copies of the revised Negative Declaration for the proposed Dublin-Pleasanton Park/Ride Project (March, 1987) are available for review at the locations identified below: Dublin Library, 7606 Amador Valley Blvd. , Dublin Pleasanton Library, 4333 Black Avenue, Pleasanton City of Livermore Library, 100 South Livermore, Avenue, Livermore Marianne Payne, Project Coordinator, may be con- tacted at ( 415) 464-6173 for further information. t CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 23, 1987 SUBJECT BART Park & Ride Lot EXHIBITS ATTACHED 1. November 25, 1986, Letter regarding Dublin Comments on Park & Ride Project 2. January 26, 1987, City Council Minutes regarding BART Park & Ride Lot 3. January 27, 1987 Letter from JoAnne Bergeron Castro 4. BART Notice regarding Negative Declaration Revised Schedule RECOMMENDATION Consider and, if additional comments are needed, provide direction to Staff. FINANCIAL STATEMENT None DESCRIPTION At the January 26, 1987, City Council meeting, Dave Burton requested the City Council to ask BART for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the Park and Ride Lot. At Mr. Burton's request, the City Council agendized the item for the February 9, 1987, City Council meeting. On January 27, 1987, JoAnne Bergeron Castro, representing the Dublin Chamber of Commerce, requested the item be tabled until the February 23, 1987, City Council meeting in order that the Chamber Board of Directors might discuss this issue. The Dublin General Plan contains various policies regarding a BART facility at the end of Golden Gate Drive. The policies are listed in the November 25, 1986, letter from the City Council to BART regarding comments on Dublin Park/Ride Project Negative Declaration (Attachment 1) . In the November 25, 1986, letter to BART the City has identified mitigation measures which are needed to avoid significant adverse impacts. The mitigation measures are listed in three categories: A. Land Use B. Traffic C. Design The preliminary response from BART Staff has been as follows: A. Land Use: BART agrees to enter into a joint use agreement to provide a mix of both BART uses and retail/commercial uses. B. Traffic: BART will request TJKM to prepare an additional traffic study to determine the traffic effects and potential mitigation measures. C. Design: BART has begun to re-design the facility to address the design concerns. After the additional traffic study is prepared and the facility is re- designed, BART Staff will meet with City Staff to discuss the project and mitigation measures. The BART Board of Directors has postponed consideration of the Negative Declaration that was previously scheduled for consideration in February. The BART Board Engineering and Operations Committee is scheduled to consider the Negative Declaration on March 24, 1987, and the Board is scheduled to take action on March 2, 1987. Staff recommends that the City Council consider this matter and, if additional comments are needed, provide direction to Staff. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COPIES TO: Dave Burton Dublin Chamber of Commerce ITEM NO. �• Richard Wenzel - BART CITY OF DUBLIN Development Services Ranning.2oning 829-4916 P.O. Box 2340 Buuding & Safety 829-0822 Dublin. CA 94568 Engineering:Public Works 829-4927 November 25, 1986 Mr. Richard C. Wenzel, Project Manager Bay Area Rapid Transit District 800 Madison Street Oakland, CA 94604 RE: Comments on Dublin Park/Ride Project Dear Mr. Wenzel: The City of Dublin appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the BART proposed Dublin Park/Ride Project. On November 24, 1986, the City Council reviewed the proposal and directed Staff to forward the following comments: I. DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN POLICIES RE. BART The Dublin General Plan contains the following policies regarding a BART facility that is shown on the Dublin General Plan Map at the end of Golden Gate Drive (see Exhibit D) : Policy 2.2.1B "Provide a downtown BART station that will serve customers and workers with and without cars. Add offices and apartments within walking distance - and eventually over BART parking." = Policy 5.1F "Connect existing cul-de-sac streets near proposed BART station south of Dublin Boulevard." Policy 5.2A "Support a compact multi-story downtown BART station and a second station to the east along I-580, provided the BART rail line is extended at least to the eastern limits of the City of Pleasanton." Policy 5.2C "Urge BART cooperation in maintaining availability of station sites and develop .standards for review of public and private improvements in the vicinity of BART stations that take account of both future traffic needs and development opportunities". The Dublin General Plan establishes the intent to have a mix of both BART uses and retail/commercial uses at the BART facility on Golden Gate Drive. The General Plan also identifies the need for a new street parallel to Dublin Bouelvard to serve future developments and to distribute BART traffic to three Dublin Boulevard intersections. "A Mr._ Richard C. Wenzel, Project Manager November 24, 1986 Page 2 II. PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES The proposed BART Dublin Park/Ride Project will not have an.v significant ad-verse impacts only if the following mitigation measures are included: A. Land Use 1. To be consistent with the Dublin General Plan, BART and the City of Dublin will need to have an agreement which assures that there will be a mix of both BART uses and retail/commercial uses at the BART facility, and that the retail/commercial uses conform to Dublin zoning and land use policies. Without such assurance, a General Plan A--endment would be required to delete the policy of mixed BART and retail/commercial .uses. B. Traffic 1. To 'adequately distribute BART traffic and to be consistent with the Dublin General* Plan, BART should dedicate and develop sufficient right-of-way to accommodate a new collector street along the 500=foot long property line o-:,- the north side of the parcel (see Exhibit A - TJM Comments) . 2. To mitigate incremental and cumulatil7e traffic impacts, BART should contribute its proportionate share to the improvements of Dublin Boulevard (see Exhibit A - TJKX Comments) . 3. To mitigate potential overflow parking impacts on surrounding on-street and off-street parking spaces, BART and the City of Dublin need to agree on a method to provide for overflow parking. C. Desizn 1. BART Staff and City Staff need to meet and resolve the following design concerns and other design details (also see Exhibit A TJKH Comments and Exhibit B Wheels Comments) Mr. Richard' C. Wenzel, Project Manager November 24, 1986 Page 3 a. . Bus Exit - The bus exit would be better located at the cul-de-sac bulb to allow for easier u-1--urns. b. Kiss-Ride Facility The kiss-ride facility would be better located within the lot. C. Driveway Design - The driv a-ways should be -wide conventional driveways without curb returns. A driveway at the cul-de-sac bulb should be aligned to radiate from the center -of the bulb. d. Bus Loading Area - The bus loading area should accommodate both BART and 1AVTA (T;heels) buses. e. Pedestrian Routes - Pedestrian routes and areas need to be clarified, and potential c . on":'licts -,;ith vehicles need to be resolved. f. Bus Shelters - Bus shelter locations and design, and facilities such as pay phones, restrooms, and maintenance/ utility structures need to be clarified. 9- Landscaping - Some additional landscaping within the lot is needed to avoid ti►e sea of asphalt -proposed for the center of the parking area. English ivy and other ground cover that can hatbox rodents should be avoided. Size, intensity, and placement of landscaping should be clarified. h. Fencing - Vinyl clad chainlink fencing or other fencing alternatives Should be clarified. i. Bridge Design - The pedestrian bridge should definitely be enclosed to provide shelter from the strong winds and other elements. Pedestrian safety while on the bridge needs to be addressed, especially during evening and off-peak hours. j - Handicapped Usage - It may be more effective to have buses pick up and drop off handicapped users at each lot instead of requiring them to use the pedestrian bridge. k. Other Design Elements - Lighting, signage, stall and aisle dimensions, 'paving, drainage, and other design elements should be clarified. `\ Mr. Richard.C. Wenzel, Project Manager November 24, 1986 Page 4 The City Council requests BART to hold a meeting, with sufficient prior notice and advertising, to secure public comments in Dublin. BART should especially seek comments from surrounding property owners .and merchants. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Maureen O'Halloran, Associate Planner, or me.. Sincerely yours, Laurence L. Tong Planning Director LLT/ao cc: Richard Ambrose Maureen O'Halloran LAVTA (Wheels) Chris Kinzel - TJKM Nancy Freely - Dublin Chamber of Commerce REC \R MEETING -_January 26, 1^07 A reg meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin ereold on Monday, Ja 26, 1987 in the meeting room of the Dub ibrary. The meeting was .ca to order at 7 :35 p.m, by Mayor L' Jeffery. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers H ty, Moffa Snyder, Vonheeder and Mayor Jeffery. PLEDGE OF GIANCE Th yor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge o le- ance to the flag. BART PARK & RIDE LOT Dave Burton, representing the Dublin Chamber of Commerce addressed the Council and expressed concerns regarding the proposed BART Park & Ride Lot. Mr. Burton stated he was shocked to see how little concern was displayed regarding the affects this will have on Dublin. The business people are very concerned regarding the traffic impacts. Traffic through the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and San Ramon Road will be terrible. Mr. Burton indicated they see the same type of bottleneck occuring in Dublin as occurs in Lafayette. Other locations should be considered. We should ask BART for a complete EIR on the Park & Ride site which will eventually become a BART station. Cm. Snyder indicated that this same issued has been discussed over a 3-4 year process and the site is identified in the General Plan. Both Dublin and Pleasanton approved the site following many public hearings. Mayor Jeffery advised Mr. Burton that due to a revision in the Brown Act, the Council is unable to act on any items not agendized. Mr . Burton requested that this item be agendized for discussion at the next regular City Council meeting on February 9, 1987 . CON ENDAR On motion of Cm. Vo seconded by Cm. Moffa unanimous vote, the Council took the follows ions : Approved Minutes of Regu ing of Janua 1987; Approved th ncial Report for Period Ending December C�G�11 (14 G G (411 Cell CC�C C � �C CG CCU CM-5-19 Regular Meeting January 26, 1987 } Y1 � i. +V � ��M .i1 wM�r M •A RECEIVED old in heritage - new in ideas JAN 3 01987 R E C E I Y ,E D in d bt DMI*P M&. JJUN 2 81981 Chamber of Commerce January 27, 1987 Mayor Linda Jeffery & City Council Members City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Boulevard, Suite 100 Dublin, California 94568 Re: Scheduled Agenda Item for February 9, 1987 Council Meeting - BART Park/Ride Dear Mayor Jeffery & Council Members: The Dublin Chamber of Commerce hereby requests that the BART Park/Ride agenda item for the February 9, 1987 City Council Agenda be tabled until the February 23, 1987 Council meeting. The Chamber Board of Directors will be meeting on February 11 , 1987 and would like an opportunity to further discuss this very important issue prior to the hearing at the City Council meeting. By tabling this matter until February 23rd would give our Board the opportunity to further study the matter. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely your , C0 ne Bergeron Cas Chairman ernment Committe JBC:nf Li Amador Valley Boulevard Dublin, California =` "-' °" i�Y �j.�lfj��.SwT/+i. T^ISO M1W'4+K1�:7FA6�'°La`SIlSS�7q':•:= ____-��:.c.=�:1::=.:Ya:.s�2�.s:��s[t`SAl�]e3..•ln+'21cnu+'.an�2:Fr K... �.-�, ..V .9i'FT:ifY+sve..fx=R`^ —�..w. ._ C. B A R T BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT R E C E 1. Y E 800 Madison Street P.O.Box 12688 R E C E I V E D Oakland,CA 94604-2688 FEB 2 1_987 Telephone(415)46 4-6000 FEB 1987 DUBUN FLANNIN4 DUBLIN-PLEASANTON PARR/RIDE PROJECT NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - REVISED SCHEDULE - MARGARET K PRYOR PRESIDENT a BARCLAY SIMPSON VICE-PRESIDENT The San Francisco Bay Area 'Rapid Transit District KEITH BERNARD proposes to adopt .'a Negative Delaration for the GENERAL MANAGER proposed 'Dublin-Pleasanton Park/Ride Project located on two sites separated by Interstate 580 just west of the . Interstate 680 interchange in eastern Alameda DIRECTORS County. The adoption ` of - a - proposed Negative Declaration ' for the proposed - Dublin-Pleasanton BARCLAY SIMPSON park/Ride Project is based on the . Initial Study. ,srDISTRICT which determined that the proposed .project will not NELLO BIANCO have a significant effect on the . environment and 2ND DISTRICT that the measures to address potentially significant ARTHUR J.SHARTSIS impacts have been included in the 3RD DISTRICT project. MARGARET K PRYOR The proposed Negative Declaration was previously ' 4TH DISTRICT scheduled to. be considered by the BART Board of ROBERT DISTRI 5TH DISTRICT Directors in early February.' In order to complete JOHN GLENN additional analysis on •the" proposed project, the 6TH DISTRICT adoption of a Negative Declaration. will now be WILFRED T.USSERY considered by . the BART Board Engineering and 7TH DISTRICT Operations Committee on Tuesday, March 24; 1987 at ARLO HALE SMITH 9:00 AM in the Board Room located at 800 Madison STH DISTRICT Street in Oakland. It is expected that the Board JOHN H.KIRKWOOD will take action on Thursday, March 26, 1987 at 9: 00 9TH DISTRICT AM in the same location. At these Board meetings, the . opportunity will be offered for interested parties to provide public comment on the adoption of a Negative Declaration. Copies of the proposed Negative Declaration for the proposed Dublin-Pleasanton Park/Ride Project may be obtained from Marianne Payne, BART Planning and Analysis Department at 464-6173. . yr , •!e•.+9+!ws•�MLT.TOS.c�• •AT�IR.Ot.,.. --_�9�•.TFT^'.'f'1T... ...- ..i.i.•YTY M.� L ��� IR.w^_^TI�l+�S�.J!`,... ._.. _ ... . _'