Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.1 Police Services Contract Evaluation 3 0 CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 21 , 1988 SUBJECT Police Services Contract Evaluation EXHIBITS ATTACHED Enforcement of State Laws and City Ordinance Agreement ; 1987 Calendar Year Report ; Police Contract Evaluation Form RECOMMENDATIONS "\ Receive Evaluation , Make Appropriate Comments , and Direct Staff to Request Necessary Modifications to Contract . FINANCIAL STATEMENT: See Below DESCRIPTION In accordance with previous police contract evaluation criteria , Staff has evaluated those police services presently provided to the City under contract with Alameda County Sheriff ' s Department . An evaluation form has been attached for City Council use if individual Councilmembers wish to identify areas of improvement for the Police Department . QUALITY OF SERVICE PROVIDED Patrol Service The Sheriff ' s Department provides the City of Dublin with 15 uniformed patrol officers and 5 patrol sergeants . Two of the 15 officers are assigned to full-time traffic enforcement. The watch commanders (sergeants) are charged with the full operational responsibility for any incident occurring on their respective watch. Commensurate authority has been delegated for them to discharge all pertinent duties . Patrol unit assignments continue to remain flexible based on needs and criminal trends . All patrol staff are expected to keep current on these trends and associated criminal activities . When specific target areas are identified , watch commanders then "direct" uniformed patrol to these areas to identity , arrest , reduce , displace, and prevent crime . Watch commanders are encouraged and expected to be innovative in their deployment of personnel and equipment . This approach ensures the effective delivery of service in a very cost effective mode . When responding to calls for service the officers not only prepare the necessary reports , but oftentimes conduct the immediate follow-up investigation . This immediate action instills community confidence in their police , promotes excellent police-community relations , and provides the officer a valuable experience . The officers that represent the city , in daily citizen contacts are both mature and experienced . The average sergeant is 42 years of age and has 17 years of law enforcement experience . The average patrol officer is 32 years of age and has 10 years of law enforcement experience . Shown below is a comparison of the key patrol services provided to the community for 1987 , compared with 1986 and 1985 . 1985 1986 1987 Calls for Service 22 ,030 23, 997 23 , 996 Reports Written 3, 218 3, 120 3, 019 Foot Patrol (Hours) 650 720 810 Arrests - All Crimes 962 806 893 Total Patrol Miles Driven 231 , 825 187 , 270 198, 762 In 1983 , Part I crimes totaled 711 , and the population of the city totaled 13, 496 . In 1987 , Part I crimes totaled 613, and the population of the city totaled 21 , 477 . This decrease of 14% in Part I crimes has taken place during a population increase of 59%. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: ITEM NO. n The staff level for patrol is adequate for fiscal year 88/89. Traffic Enforcement In October 1987 , a second full-time traffic enforcement position was staffed . During calendar year 1987 , traffic related accidents and injuries were both reduced by 167 and DUI arrests were increased by 197. The traffic officers continue to meet regularly with the Traffic Safety Committee (Police, Engineering, Public Works and TJKM) in a effort to identify and solve traffic and safety related issues . This pro-active approach both reduces community generated complaints and provides the action solving forum, to handle those other citizen complaints, in a timely and effective manner . Consistent with local policy , a total of 152 abandoned vehicles were towed from our city streets in 1987 . The removal of these unsightly wrecks has and will continue to be a priority . A courtesy warning citation program was also implemented this year for those citizens who commit minor traffic offenses . The offender signs for and receives a copy of the citation , but , is not required to appear in court . Again , this form of education teaches and leaves a favorable opinion with the citizen and community . Shown below are some of the key traffic enforcement workload measures for 1987 , compared to 1986 and 1985 : 1985 1986 1987 Citations Issued 4 ,836 6, 179 5 ,456 Accidents Investigated 413 462 388 Injury Accidents Investigated 86 69 57 Non-Injury Accidents Investigated 327 392 329 Fatal Accidents 0 1 2 The staffing level for traffic enforcement is adequate for fiscal year 88/89 . Criminal Investigation Four Detective-Sergeants are presently assigned to criminal investigations . One of these sergeants is assigned the responsiblity of investigating juvenile related crimes and supervision of the crime prevention programs . Another sergeant is responsible for investigating all drug/narcotic related offenses , and the remaining two sergeants investigate all other person/property related crimes . Their combined years of law enforcement experience is extensive and varied. Two new community education programs were undertaken by investigations and completed in calendar year 1987 . As a result of these programs, the number of reported check offenses were reduced by 127 and the number of reported stolen vehicles were reduced by 227. Closure rates on persons crimes totaled 997 and closure rates on property crimes totaled 567. For Fiscal Year 1988-89 , the Police Chief has recommended replacing one of the County unmarked units with a rental car from a local rental car agency on a trial basis. The advantages to a rental car are as follows: 1 . A rental car could be exchanged as often as needed by the Department , and that would be more effective in undercover surveillance and investigations . 2 . Investigators would no longer have to ferry cars for service to the County Maintenance Yard , and therefore , increase the number of hours Investigators spent on Criminal Investigation. The disadvantage to the rental car program is that the cost would be $1 , 968 per vehicle per year more than leasing cars from the County . The staffing level for general criminal investigations is considered adequate for fiscal year 88/89 . Juvenile Investigation The investigator assigned to this position is responsible for the investigation of crimes by and against juveniles . Particular emphasis is placed upon child abuse and sexual molestation cases . Of particular importance is the continued maintenace of community oriented programs aimed at helping the youth of the city of Dublin. The' police department , in cooperation with school administration officials , has developed an alcohol/drug awareness program to include grades K-8. By establishing -2- these "educational" contacts , with our youth, the department hopes to strengthen and reinforce those desired moral characteristics which began in the family unit . The assigned investigator sits on the SARB Board (School Attendance Review Board) which meets monthly , and takes appropriate action with respect to those high school students who have truancy problems. A similar program has recently been implemented within the Murray School District for grades K-8 . During 1987 , Child Protective Services (CPS) referred 51 cases for investigation. Narcotic Investigation The narcotics investigator experienced an increase of 15% in the assigned caseload for calendar year 1987. The local drugs of preference continue to be cocaine, methamphetamine , and marijuana. The police department is making progress in identifying the suppliers and dealers residing in or frequenting the city . The closure rate remains high with 102 cases or 84% of the total being closed . Shown below are some of the key narcotic enforcement workload measures for 1987 , compared to 1986 and 1985 : Narcotics Activity 1985 1986 1987 Persons Investigated # 106 122 Search Warrants # 45 12 Arrests # 52 50 Drugs Seized ($ value) # $85 , 340 $35 , 631 Asset Seizures ($ value) # 0 $25, 581 *Position not staffed The staffing level for this activity is considered adequate for fiscal year 88/89. Community Programs Dublin Police Services has developed and presently provides the following programs to the community : 1 . Neighborhood Crime Watch - The city has a total of 88 neighborhood crime watches in operation . A total of 7 new crime watches were added during 1987 . 2. Merchant Alert Program - At the end of 1987 , merchant alert members totaled 91 active members . These members participate in six(6) interlinking alert lists . A total of 71 new members were added in 1987 . 3 . Community Awareness - The Department is actively involved in informing the community regarding various public safety issues . During 1987 , forty-seven(47) presentations were made to various community groups , including schools and service organizations . The topics of such presentations include : Personal Safety , Home Security , Bunco Schemes , Drug Awarenss/Resistance , Rape Resistance , Earthquake/Disaster Preparedness . Most presentations are supported with appropriate literature and visual aids . 4 . Safety Literature - The Department distributes a wide variety of literature aimed at crime prevention. During 1987 , over 11 ,000 pieces of safety literature were distributed to Dublin residents and merchants . 5 . School Liaison - The Department continues to enjoy and build upon the excellent relations it has with all school districts within the city . Individual programs are tailored for specific schools with respect to truancy , drug awareness , bike safety , personal safety , and dangerous stranger . Business Office Services The business office of Dublin Police Services is staffed by two Specialist Clerks , five days per week from 7 : 30 a .m. to 5:00 p.m. Primary responsiblities include report processing, report duplication, record maintenance , typing , evidence processing, evidence security , evidence destruction , correspondence, statistical recordkeeping , and other related matters . Both positions involve heavy public contact , both on the -3- telephone and at the counter . During 1987 , the workload generated by public contact increased by 507 (40, 554 public contacts) . With this increased workload , other assigned duties are unable to be completed , except in an overtime status . With the increase in public contacts and the installation of the County ' s Computer Aided Dispatch and Police Records Management at Dublin Police Services , the Police Chief has recommended the addition of a full-time Data Imput Clerk in April 1989 . This will coincide with the anticipated occupancy of the new Police Facility . PUBLIC RELATIONS COMMUNICATIONS Individual Contact with Citizens , Merchants and Schools Positive police contacts , to promote excellent public relations and community involvement , is of major importance to all members of the Department . Some of the community phrases communicated to the Police Chief to commend staff is as follows : . . .thank you for the quick and professional manner in which you responded to my sons accident . You have my appreciation both as a mother and citizen. . . . . .The investigation was detailed and time consuming , but , was conducted admirably . Reports completed with great attention to detail . Always available for questions , was most helpful . . . . . .Every aspect of the operation has been tactfully and efficiently conducted by your department . You are to be commended for your professionalism and excellent public relation skills. . . . . .I was in court the day he testified and I want to let you know how professional and thorough his investigation was . . . . . .He provides the children with a positive image of a police officer and has great rapport with youngsters . . . . . .Through the years we have worked with countless law enforcement agencies , but , it is rare we have had the opportunity and privilege to work with one as receptive to the problems of substance abuse as your department . . . . . .Wanted to drop you a note and tell you how impressed I was by the way she handled her duties . She was courteous , pleasant , and completely in charge of the situation . . . Public Information Dissemination Public service information is routinely distributed to all segments of the community. This task is accomplsihed via crime prevention and uniformed patrol . Department Visibility and Identification Dublin Police Services continues to maintain a profile of high visibility within the community . This profile serves a twofold purpose . First , with respect to citizens , a feeling of safety and security is imparted , by the uniformed presence . Secondly , the criminal element is dissuaded and displaced when the uniformed presence exceeds a level they are uncomfortable with. In addition to mobil patrol , the foot patrol logged 810 hours in 1987 . ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Communication of Police Activities to City Manager and City Council The Police Chief is under the administrative direction of the City Manager . Although the Police Chief attends the weekly department head meetings , he also meets daily with the City Manager for the purpose of briefings and discussion on matters of local importance . The Department also provides a monthly statistical report on police activity to the City Manager and City Council . The Police Chief and his staff are readily accessible to meet with any segment of the community , as the need may arise . -4- Police Services Planning All major operations of the Police Department are continually monitored for overall effectiveness . Necessary changes or adjustments are made to achieve operational efficiency , as part of the internal appraisal process. The Department understands the need for strategic planning consistent with goals , objectives , and local policy matters . At the Police Chief ' s request , the Sheriff ' s Department has authorized the following training for assigned staff : 1 - Lieutenant (on-site commander) attended "Officer Involved Shootings/Use of Force" , course completed October 1987 1 - Lieutenant (on-site commander) attended "Commanders Vice , Narcotics , Intelligence" , course completed December 1987 . 1 - Det/Sgt. attended "Informant Maintenance" course , completed November 1987 1 - Det/Sgt . attended "FBI Crime Prevention Seminar" , completed December 1987 1 - Det/Sgt . attended "Homicide Investigation" course, completed May 1987 1 - Det/Sgt . attended "Sexual Assault Investigation" course, completed June 1987 1 - Det/Sgt . attended "Informant Maintenance" course, completed April 1987 5 - Watch Commanders (Sergeants) attended "Advanced Officers Course" , during 1987 10 - Patrol Officers attended "Advanced Officers Course" , during 1987 4 - Patrol Officers were trained as operators on use of the "Intoxilizer" , during 1987 2 - Patrol Officers attended "Traffic Accident Investigators" , course completed February 1987 3 - Patrol Officers attended "Evidence Technician" course , completed March 1987 1 - Patrol Officer attended "Field Training Officers" course, completed July 1987 1 - Civilian Crime Prevention Specialist attended "Crime Prevention Program Development" course , completed April 1987 1 - Civilian Crime Prevention Specialist attended "FBI Crime Prevention Seminar" , completed December 1987 Cost Effectiveness In studying the cost effectiveness of the contract , it appears the only viable alternative to the contract , at this time, is for the City to provide the service with city employees . The analysis below clearly shows that contract police services is more cost effective than providing the same service with in-house employees . This assumption , while accurate for the present , could change in the future , as conditions change . ANALYSIS - FULL SERVICE POLICE DEPARTMENT VS. CONTRACT POLICE DEPARTMENT Personnel Costs In comparing personnel costs , Staff assumed that the City would have to pay wages and benefits at least equal to those paid to county personnel . It is assumed that the City would have - to complete in the same labor market for police staff . -5- Although the individual personnel costs would be approximately the same , the total personnel costs would be higher for the following reasons : 1 . Sworn Personnel - Due to the hazardous nature of police service , officers do receive occasional injuries . The agreement in the City ' s present contract states the county will replace an officer after 10 days , due to illness or injury . If the City were to employ its own officers , the City would incur the workers compensation expense of an injured officer . The City would also realize a reduced level of manpower . For serious injuries , the costs to the City would be significant . The county also provides to the City additional officer support for an emergency or major event for which the City does not have adequate on-site staff to cover . This additional support is provided at no cost to the City . Cost - It is difficult to determine exactly what the additional costs to the City would be or what the reduced level of service might be as a result of the City providing public safety with city employees . There would be a definite increase in costs to the City and most likely a reduced level of service when compared to the City ' s present contractual agreement with Alameda County . 2 . Civilian Personnel - It is proposed that the county provide the City with two(2) Specialist Clerks and one Data Input Clerk who are stationed at the Dublin City Offices ; and . 1 full-time equivalent (FTE) Supervising Clerk , and . 5 (FTE) Data Input Clerk, who are located off-site at Eden Township Substation . If the City were to assume all police civilian services , the City would have to hire four (4) civilian employees to cover all necessary business office and records functions . This would represent an increase of .4 (FTE) position more than the City presently funds. Cost - The estimated additional cost of having City employees perform this function would be approximately $15 , 750 more per year than the City presently pays . Dispatch Services The City anticipates that it will be charged approximately $136, 000 for Dispatch Services for Fiscal Year 1988-89. These services include broadcasting calls and details , answering phones , computer check and confirmation of outstanding warrants , running license numbers , monitoring for emergency traffic , and notifications to other agencies , as may be needed . If the City were to provide dispatching services on-site with City employees , the cost for providing these services on a 24-hour basis would be as follows : Item Annual Cost Communications Equipment Capital Cost ( $250 , 000-$300, 000)# $43 ,883-58, 510 Financed and amortized over 8 years Maintenance $ 9 ,000 Personnel 2 Dispatchers 24 hours per day would require 10 dispatchers Annual Cost $313 ,000 Estimated City Dispatch Cost $365 , 883-380, 510 Contract dispatch cost $136 , 000 Additional Cost of City Dispatch $229 , 883-244 , 510 `Depends upon sophistication of equipment purchased . -6- Indirect Costs The indirect charges proposed by the County for Fiscal Year 1988-89 are $78 ,680 with an additional $5, 240 for insurance. If the City were to have a full service City Police Department, additional Staff would be required in the City Manager ' s Office and/or Administrative Services Department to handle additional personnel and finance workload generated by police employees . The estimated cost of this additional staffing would be approximately $32 , 500 per year . The provision of police service with City employees would also require insurance coverage under the ABAG PLAN. It has been estimated that the City would incur an additional $38,000 in additional insurance premiums . A comparison of indirect costs is shown below. County ' Indirect Costs $78, 680 Insurance Costs 5, 240 Total $83, 920 City Indirect Costs $32 , 500 Insurance Costs 38 ,000 Total $70, 500 The County ' s indirect charges are approximately $13 ,420 less than the City would pay with its own department . Summary of Costs Based on the above comparison, the additional cost to the City of operating a full service City Police Department would range from approximately $232 , 213 to $246 ,840. Overall Performance The performance of Dublin Police Services is the highest of professional standards . This observation and opinion is made through close daily contacts with the Police Chief , his subordinate officers , and periodic reviews of statistical data and written and verbal contacts with our citizens . Assigned personnel are both mature and experienced. They relate very well with the community and are respected for both the services and manner in which the services are provided . The Sheriff ' s Department has been receptive to specialized training for on-site staff , to ensure Dublin officers are properly trained in all aspects of full service municipal enforcement . Each officer and civilian employee is proud to be a member of Dublin Police Services and continually endeavor to meet or exceed the high performance standards that have been historically set. On-site employees share a special camaraderie that contributes to excellent morale and efficiency , signified by very low annual sick leave useage of only 3 . 5 days . Some of the overall accomplishments for 1987 include : A crime rate 14% under the 1983 level , during which time the population has increased 59%. Increased arrests and criminal case closures . The development of new community crime prevention programs and continued maintenance of proven existing programs. The implementation of a highly visible and proactive traffic enforcement program, the success in part is attributed to a 16% reduction in traffic accidents and related injuries . Implementation of a courtesy/warning citation program for minor offenders . An increase of neighborhood watches by 10%, and an increase in Merchant Alert members of 355%. -7- < f 0 Of AI,�O u > JUL 2 31986 C'T(IfO�M�* O//ICC OF THE DATE. July 22, 1986 CLt 11M, •OANO OF SUP6AVISOAf City of Dublin P. '0. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 c/o J. Thomas RE: CONTRACT #_C-86-253 :FILE /2769 Gentlemen: The Board of Supervisors, County of Alameda, State of California approved and executed the above numbered Contract on the above date. [XJ We retained the original Contract for the Board's file and forwarded copies to the Auditor-Controller and the applicable county department. ( ] We retained the original Contract for the Board's file and forwarded one copy to the Auditor-Controller. All remaining copies are herewith returned to your Department for distribution. ( J We retained the original Contract and are returning all remaining copies to you for distribution. ( J We are returning all copies of the unsigned Contract to you. When the Contract is fully executed, please send the original to the Clerk, Board of Supervisors and one copy to the Alameda County Auditor-Controller. Very truly yours, WILLIAM MEHRWEIN, Clerk WM/yfc /rgc Enclosure(s) cc: County Auditor-Controller Department/Sheriff's Department 0959B 122 1 0 AM 5 TMt[T• SUIT[ 580•0 AML•ND, CALI FO P141 940 12•1.111 074-6794 r ENFORC( T OF STATE LAWS AND CITY ORDIV ES 1G THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this -1-tt�1!d`ay of July, 1986, by and between the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and the CITY OF DUBLIN, hereinafter referred to as "CITY"; t RECITALS: a, (a) The CITY was incorporated on February 1 , 1982, and has requested that the Sheriff of the COUNTY of Alameda continue to provide law enforcement services in the enforcement of State laws within the area of the CITY until June 30, 1989. (b) The CITY is desirous of contracting with the COUNTY for the enforcement by the Sheriff of CITY police ordinances within the area of the CITY until June 30, 1989. (c) The CITY and COUNTY may review annually, in May of each year, the level of service provided within the CITY and mutually agree on appropriate adjustments. (d) The CITY and COUNTY agree that there shall be annual cost-of-living adjustments and operational cost increases. Annual cost-of-living adjustments shall include, but are not limited to, salary increases granted by the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall review and update annually, in May of each year, the cost of providing services to the CITY and provide the CITY with projected cost adjustments . THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED (a) The COUNTY agrees, through the Sheriff of the COUNTY of Alameda, to enforce CITY police ordinances and State laws within the corporate limits of CITY to the extent and in the manner hereinafter set forth. I . 1 -2- . < 1 1 The enforcement of such municipal police ordinances shall be in connection with, and as an incident to, the performance of the Sheriff's law enforcement functions within the area of the CITY. The level of enforcement services shall be that same basic level of service as shown on the organization chart attached hereto as Exhibit A and made part hereof by this reference. On an annual basis, the CITY shall review the desired level of enforcement services with Sheriff's Department representatives. Exhibit A shall reflect the number of personnel assigned pursuant to the terms of this a reement. Exhibit A may be modified on an annual basis to reflect desired 9 tianges in the level of service. In no case shall the level of service provided be less than that which is provided to the unincorporated area. The COUNTY shall strive to meet the requested level of service, provided that the request would not be detrimental to the provision of adequate police enforcement. When the CITY requests a modification to Exhibit A which requires additional personnel , the COUNTY shall make every effort to provide said personnel within ninety (90) days. If the assignment will be delayed, the COUNTY shall notify the CITY of the anticipated date in which the additional personnel will be assigned. Said notice shall also indicate the reasons why a delay is encountered. The CITY may request to meet with the Sheriff or his designated representative to provide input on the selection of the On-Site Commander. The input shall focus on the type of background, experience and other factors which are pertinent to the provision of services pursuant to this contract. The actual selection and assignment shall be at the sole discretion of the Sheriff. Y i '.. -3- The rendition of such service, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed, shall remain in the COUNTY. In the event of dispute between the parties as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder, or the level or manner of performance of such service, the determination thereof made by the Sheriff of the COUNTY shall be final and conclusive as between the parties hereto. Services performed hereunder shall not include the supplying of crossing guards. (b) To facilitate the performance of said functions, it is hereby agreed that the COUNTY shall have full cooperation and assistance from the CITY, .., , s officers, agents and employees. (c) For the purpose of performing said functions, COUNTY shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, communication facilities, and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder. (d) Whenever the COUNTY and CITY mutually agree as to the necessity for any such COUNTY officer or department to maintain administrative headquarters in the CITY, CITY shall furnish at its own cost and expense all necessary office space, furniture, and furnishings, office supplies, janitorial service, telephone, light, water, and other utilities. In all instances where special supplies, stationery, notices, forms and the like must be issued in the name of the CITY, the same shall be supplied by the CITY at its expense. I -4- _. It is expressly understood that in the event a local administrative office is maintained in the CITY for any such COUNTY officer or department, such quarters may be used by the COUNTY officer or department In connection with the performance of its duties in territory outside of the CITY and adjacent thereto, provided, however, that the performance of such outside duties shall not be at any additional cost to the CITY. The COUNTY shall reimburse the CITY for the cost of providing such facilities to the extent that such facilities are used for activities outside the City of Dublin. (This paragraph is not operative under mutual aid response. ) The COUNTY agrees to provide four (4) unmarked vehicles — equipped with police communications and safety equipment. The age and condition of the i::.rs shall be comparable to vehicles used for similar duties in the unincorporated area of the COUNTY. The CITY shall pay to the COUNTY a monthly lease cost which is established on an annual basis. Also, there shall be an additional charge for maintenance based on the number of miles of service the vehicle is used. The CITY shall have the ability to terminate the lease of the vehicles during the term of this agreement, provided that the CITY notifies the COUNTY in writing no later than April 1st. The lease shall be terminated on the 30th day of June following the notice, unless the two parties mutually agree to a different date. (f) The COUNTY agrees to replace police or civilian personnel assigned to the CITY who have been absent from duty for more than ten (10) working days as a result of illness or injury. Replacement shall occur at the end of the ten (10) day period during which the employee was absent. -5- (g) The COUNTY will continue to provide training related to the provision of municipal police services to personnel assigned to Dublin. II. LIABILITY (a) All persons employed in the performance of such services and functions for CITY shall be COUNTY employees, and no CITY employee as such shall be taken over by COUNTY and no person hereunder shall have any CITY pension, civil service, or other status or right. (b) CITY shall not be liable for any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages, or other compensation to any COUNTY personnel performing services hereunder for CITY, or any liability other than that provided for in this agreement. Except as herein otherwise specified, CITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any COUNTY employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment. (c) The CITY will assume liability and pay cost of defense and hold the COUNTY harmless from loss, costs or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of CITY officers, agents and employees occurring in the performance of this agreement. In addition, when liability arises pursuant to Section 830, et seq. , of the Government Code, by reason of a dangerous condition of public property of the CITY, the CITY shall assume liability and pay cost of defense and hold the COUNTY harmless from loss, costs or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of CITY officers, agents and employees, whether or not arising in the performance of an agreement between the parties hereto. I -6- (d) The COUNTY will assume liability and pay cost of defense and hold the CITY harmless from loss, costs or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of COUNTY officers, agents and employees occurring in the performance of this agreement. In addition, when liability arises pursuant to Setion 830, et seq. , of the Government Code, by reason of a dangerous condition of public property of the COUNTY, the COUNTY shall assume liability and pay cost of defense and hold the CITY harmless from loss, costs or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of COUNTY officers, agents and employees, whether or not arising in the performance of an agreement between the parties hereto. III. INSURANCE Whatever insurance agreement between CITY and COUNTY is in effect during the term of this contract shall apply hereto and is fully incorporated herein by reference. IV. COST AND BILLING PROCEDURES (a) CITY shall pay for actual cost of services provided under this agreement at rates to be determined by COUNTY in accordance with the policies and procedures established by the Board of Supervisors. (b) The COUNTY shall deliver to CITY within thirty (30) days after the close of each calendar month an itemized invoice which covers the actual costs of all services performed during said month, and CITY shall pay COUNTY therefore within thirty (30) days after date of said invoice. If such payment is not received by COUNTY at the office which is described on said invoice within thirty (30) days after the date of . -7- delivery of said invoice, COUNTY is entitled to recover interest thereof. Said interest shall be at the rate of one percent (1%) per calendar month or any portion thereof calculated from the last day of the month in which the services were performed. V. TERMINATION This contract shall have an effective date of July 1 , 1986, and shall run for a period of three (3) years ending June 30, 1989. This contract may be modified at any time by mutual written consent or terminated upon six (6) months prior written notice by either party. I ATTEST: ,C TY :OF DUBLIN By: I ;G _.� By: ^City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS,TO FORM: B Y: City Attorney ATTEST: William Mehrwein COU TY OF ALAMED Clerk of the Board Supervisors , By: �'y By• - Deputy Chairman, Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: Richard J. Moore County Counsel „ - By: Deputy f h •9by certify under penalty of perjury that the Chairman of Board of Supervi3ors was duly authorized to execute this, document on behalf ojJ(jl kC�Zt �Alameda by a majority vote of the Board on ;and that a copy ha.; been delivered to the Chairman as provid bv overnment Code Section 25103. Attest: — UL22_MR WILLIAM MEHRWE;N,Clark,Guard of Supervisors,Countyof Alameda, State ofClalifornia A / DR:1 ph. a �Cn c�CL L'ak�0A U L.AA 8814c-0105c DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES _ ORGANIZATIONAL/STAFFING CHART _ ASSISTANT SHERIFF 8 . 08% i 1 ON-SITE, COMMANDER (A) PATROL DRUG ENFORCEMENT JUVENILE INVESTIGATIONS RECORD KEEPING CRIME PREVENTION (B) (C) ( D) (E) (F) (G ) I i I SERVICE SECTION (Off-Site ) i . 05 Supervising Clerk . 50 Data Input Clerk A. Full-Time On-Site Commander B. 4 Patrol Sergeants, 13 Officers C. 1 Detective/Sergeant D. . 5 Detective/Sergeant NOTE: ------- denotes assigned personnel E. 2 Detective/Sergeants who perform services from F. 2 Specialist Clerks off-site locations . G. . 5 Detective/Sergeant M E M O R A N D U M 1 Date: February 22, 1988 FROM: Police Chief TO: City Council City Manager SUBJ: ANNUAL REPORT - 1987 Dublin Police Services continues to accrue some very impressive statistics that deserve special recognition, in this message to you, on the 1987 Annual Report. Closure rates on assigned cases as follows : Persons Crimes = 99% Property Crimes = 56% Narcotic/Drug Crimes = 84% Traffic related accidents and injuries were both reduced by 16% and DUI arrests were increased by 19%. While it is true fewer traffic citations were issued in 1987, the traffic fine revenue collected by the city increased by 56% in 1987. This increase in revenue is attributed to our commercial vehicle weight enforcement program. In 1983, Part I Crimes totaled 711 , and the population of the city totaled 13 ,496. In 1987, Part I Crimes totaled 613, and the population of the city totaled 21 , 477. This decrease of 14% in Part I Crimes has taken place during a population increase of 59%. Part I crimes comprise eight separate and distinct classifi- cations. In comparing 1987 to 1983, five classifications were reduced from 10% to 83%; one classification remains unchanged; and two classifications have increased from 54% to 200%. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 0 % Change 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 83-87 Total Murder 0 0 0 2 0 0 Total Rape 6 4 2 1 1 (83%) Total Robbery 19 9 16 12 16 (16% ) Total Assault 19 17 20 17 9 (58%) Total Burglary 207 177 155 169 146 (29%) Total Larceny 421 451 458 448 378 ( 10%) Total Stolen Vehicles 37 58 70 75 57 54% Total Arson 2 4 5 2 6 200% TOTALS: 711 720 726 726 613 ( 14%) ANNUAL REPORT - 1987 February 22, 1988 Page Two These statistics, among other factors, are responsible for the city of Dublin' s ranking as one of the top 10 cities to live in. As impressive as these statistics are this turnabout could not have occurred without a lot 'of hard work and support. Hard work and dedication on the part of those men and women who comprise Dublin Police Services, civilian and sworn alike, and the support of the City Manager and City Council. JS:mjg cc: Charles C. Plummer, Sheriff H.T. Garrigan, Undersheriff DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES 1987 CALENDAR YEAR REPORT February 22, 1988 OF I) POLICE SERVICES CITY OF DUBLIN Dear Reader: Enclosed herein is the annual report for calendar year 1987, prepared by Specialist Clerk Mary Jane Grecco, for Dublin Police Services. The report tabulates police response to crimes reported or detected within the city, and compares 1987' s policing effort with the previous year. The report is divided into three sections: a. Organization and personnel data including workload indicators and volunteer services. b. A statistical accounting of criminal activity and police response for calendar year 1987. c. Comparison of calendar year 1987 statistics with calendar year 1986. A word of warning. The comparisons are shown in percentages and can be very misleading when applied to insignificant numbers. This report is presented as an accounting of Dublin Police Services activities on behalf of the City of Dublin in calendar year 1987. Sincerely John Severini Chief of Police JS:mjg DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES ORGANIZATIONAL/STAFFING CHART UNDERSHERIFF 8 . 08% I ON-SITE COMMANDER (A) i J DRUG RECORD CRIME TRAFFIC PATROL ENFORCEMENT JUVENILE INVESTIGATIONS KEEPING PREVENTION ENF, UNIT (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) . SERVICE SECTION (Off-Site) . 05 Supervising Clerk . 50 Data Input Clerk A. Full-Time On-Site Commander B. 5 Patrol Sergeants, 13 Officers C. 1 Detective/Sergeant D. .5 Detective/Sergeant NOTE: ------- denotes assigned personnel E. 2 Detective/Sergeants who perform services from F. 2 Specialist Clerks off-site locations. G. . 5 Detective/Sergeant, . 5 Crime Prevention Assistant H. 2 Officers STAFFING Assigned Personnel Commanding Officer - John Severini, Lieutenant Detective Sergeants - Pat Adams, Sergeant Albert Chavarria, Sergeant David DiFranco, Sergeant James Hodges, Sergeant Patrol Sergeants - Clyde Archer, Sergeant Gilbert Bates, Sergeant Harold Estes, Sergeant William Hillman, Sergeant Gloria Ramirez, Sergeant Patrol Officers - Robert Atkinson, Deputy Sheriff Jeff Bromstead, Deputy Sheriff Chris Carmine, Deputy Sheriff Dennis Churich, Deputy Sheriff Robert Clouse, Deputy Sheriff John Hardester, Deputy Sheriff Jeff Harvey, Deputy Sheriff Glenn Moon, Deputy Sheriff Dan Naugle, Deputy Sheriff Maryann Remell, Deputy Sheriff Steve Roderick, Deputy Sheriff Bob Rodrigues, Deputy Sheriff Tony Sparks, Deputy Sheriff Traffic Officer - Dennis Atkinson, Deputy Sheriff Richard Kuwitzky, Deputy Sheriff Clerical - Elaine Grealis, Specialist Clerk Mary Jane Grecco, Specialist Clerk Crime Prevention - William Leach, Part-time Assistant Years with the Department Sergeants Total years all sergeants - 155 Average years per sergeant - 17 Average age per sergeant - 42 Deputies Total years all deputies - 152 Average years per deputy - 10 Average age per deputy - 32 -2- STAFFING (continued) Average Vacancies Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Complement Badge - 25 Civilian - 2.5 Terminations Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Resignation Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Retirements Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Disability Retirements Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Total Separations Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Transfers Badge - 6 Civilian - 0 -3- OVERTIME Badge Paid Overtime Hours - 1655 Compensatory Hours - 543 TOTAL HOURS 2198 Civilian Paid Overtime Hours 52 TOTAL HOURS 52 TOTAL PAID OVERTIME HOURS 1707 TOTAL COMPENSATORY HOURS 543 TOTAL HOURS 2250 LEAVES Total Number of Leaves Granted Badge 0 Civilian - 0 Military Leaves Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Number of Military Leave Days Granted Badge - 0 Civilian - 0 Industrial Leave - Total Number of Industrial Leave Days off Badge - 41 Civilian - 0 Total Number Industrial Leave Cases Reported Badge - 2 Civilian - 0 -4- LEAVES (continued) Sick Leave Days Off Number Days Per Employee Per Year Badge 88 3.5 Civilian. 12 6 ASSIGNED VEHICLES Patrol - Miles Driven - 198,762 Investigations - Miles Driven - 79,261 TOTAL MILES DRIVEN 278,023 VEHICLE ACCIDENTS Administration - 0 Preventable - 1 Patrol - 3 Non-Preventable - 3 Investigations - 1 CRIMINAL ACTIVITY Patrol Activity Service Calls for Service 23,996 Reports Written 3,019 Field Interview Cards Made 813 Bicycle Cards Made (Stolen=62; Abandoned=19) 81 Foot Patrol 810 hours -5- CRIMINAL ACTIVITY (continued) Part I Offenses Reported Murder 0 Aggravated Assault 9 Robbery 16 Rape 1 Theft 378 Burglary 146 Stolen Vehicles 57 Arson 6 SUB-TOTAL 613 Other Offenses (Includes Misdemeanors) 1 ,000 Total Offenses 1 , 613 Property Value Value of Property Stolen $528,678 Value of Property Recovered $ 81 ,257 Investigations Cleared Cases Property Crimes Suspect/Adult Suspect/Juvenile Assigned 444 Closed 250 130 65 Other 44 Closure Rate: 56% Checks Assigned 113 Closed 132 127 0 Other 10 Closure Rate: 117% Persons Crimes Assigned 160 Closed 159 91 89 Other 38 Closure Rate: 99% -6- INVESTIGATIONS (continued) Cleared Cases (continued) Narcotics Suspect/Adult Suspect/Juvenile Assigned 122 Closed 102 87 15 Other 0 Closure Rate: 84% NARCOTICS Investigations Adult Juvenile Male 87 14 Female 24 2 TOTAL 111 16 Arrests Adult Juvenile Male 31 8 Female 8 3 TOTAL 39 11 Illicit Drugs Seized Quantity Heroin .12 Cocaine (grams) 105.73 Methamphetamine (grams) 132 Marijuana (grams) 574 Marijuana (cigarettes) 21 Marijuana (plants) 19 Hashish (ounce) 3 LSD (tablets) 125 Psilocybin 5.85 TOTAL STREET VALUE $35,631 .00 -7- ARRESTS/COMPLAINTS ADULT JUVENILE TOTAL On-View Felonies - Patrol 86 24 110 On-View Felonies - Investigations 40 6 46 Warrant Felonies - Patrol 16 0 16 Warrant Felonies - Investigations 8 0 8 On-View Misdemeanors - Patrol 369 9 378 On-View Misdemeanors - Investigations 8 1 9 Warrant Misdemeanors - Patrol 277 0 277 Warrant Misdemeanors - Investigations 1 0 1 Notice to Appear - Felony - Patrol 6 6 Notice to Appear - Felony - Investigations 1 1 Notice To Appear - Misd. -Patrol 39 39 Notice to Appear - Misd. - Investigations 2 2 TOTAL ALL ARRESTS 893 Complaints Filed - Felony - Patrol 87 Complaints Filed - Felony - Investigation 151 Complaints Filed - Misdemeanor - Patrol 523 Complaints Filed - Misdemeanor - Investigation 48 Total Complaints Submitted - Patrol 610 Total Complaints Charged - Patrol 499 Total Complaints Submitted - Investigation 189 Total Complaints Charged - Investigation 143 TOTAL ALL COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED 799 TOTAL ALL COMPLAINTS CHARGED 642 -8- TRAFFIC Drunk Driving Arrests Adult Juvenile Total Male 138 0 138 Female 24 2 26 TOTAL 164 Citations Issued Parking 839 Mechanical 1 ,195 Moving 3 ,422 TOTAL CITATIONS ISSUED 5, 456 Accidents Investigated (Includes Private Property) Fatality Accidents 2 Injury Accidents (persons injured - 90 ) 57 Non-Injury Accidents 329 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 388 Accident Types (Excludes Private Property) Auto/Pedestrian 1 Auto/Bicycle 9 Fixed Object 35 Parked Vehicle 38 Vehicle/Vehicle 231 Accident Causes (Excludes Private Property) Drunk Drivers (DUI) 18 Speed 113 Unsafe Turns 48 Mechanical 1 Traffic Signals (Fail to Obey) 28 Other 65 -9- CRIME PREVENTION Residential Safety Neighborhood Watch Meetings 16 Number of Persons Attending 238 Number of Neighborhood Watches in Operation 89 Operation I .D. Programs Initiated - Required Part of Neighborhood Watch 27 Security Surveys Conducted - Self-Conducting survey given to each Neighborhood Watch member residence 265 Merchant' s Program Merchant' s Alert Program - 91 merchants formed into six( 6 ) interlinking alert lists Security Surveys Conducted 18 Community Awareness Program Radio Community Service Messages 0 Television Community Services Messages 0 Newspaper Community Service Messages 10 Interviews 20 School Presentations (1 , 483 persons in attendance) 2 Group Talks and Service Organizations (Except Neighbor- hood watch) ( 252 persons in attendance) 8 Earthquake Preparedness Presentation (716 persons in attendance) 6 Safety Literature Program Crime Prevention Material Distributed at Group Talks or by Patrol 3 , 067 Neighborhood Watch Groups - 495 packets with 14 items per packet 3 , 716 Merchant ' s Alert - 25 packets with 4 items per packet and Merchant Alert Newsletter 52 Commercial Shoplifting Prevention Material 429 Crime Prevention Information Rack (located in front offices of Dublin Police Services and Dublin Library) 4 ,050 Special Mailing by City of Dublin 0 TOTAL MATERIAL DISTRIBUTED 11 , 314 Environmental Design Reviews 53 -10- SERVICE SECTION Citizen Inquiries Telephone Calls 37,665 Walk-Ins 2,889 Records Reports Processed 3 ,019 Supplemental Reports Processed 2,568 Alpha Cards Processed 5,678 Field Interview Cards Processed 813 Bicycle Cards Processed 81 Bicycles Processed for Auction 49 Insurance Company Verifications Sent 640 Total False Alarms Responded to: 683 Residential 40 Commercial 643 Total Pieces of Evidence Processed 1 , 271 Permits Issued Bingo Permits 2 One-Day Liquor License Permits 13 Gun Dealer Permits 3 Explosive Sales Permits 1 Dance Licenses 0 Massage Permits 0 Second-Hand Goods Permits 1 Parade Permits 3 Peddlers Permits 0 -11 - VOLUNTEER PROGRAM Reserve Officers 20,068 Volunteer/Clerical 0 Crime Prevention/Clerical 20 Cadet Program 0 TOTAL VOLUNTEER HOURS 2,088 -12- JUVENILE ACTIVITY Arrests Felony Misdemeanors Total Male 32 35 67 Female 5 16 21 TOTAL 88 Notice to Appear Male 35 Female 13 TOTAL 48 Traffic Citations Issued 377 -13- MAJOR WORKLOAD INDICATORS Calendar Year Comparison Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease CALLS FOR SERVICE 23,997 23,996 No Change REPORTS WRITTEN 3,120 3,019 (03%) CITATIONS ISSUED 6,179 5,456 ( 12%) ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED 462 388 (16%) TOTAL 33,758 32,859 (03%) -14- CALENDAR YEAR COMPARLIXN Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease PERSONNEL Overtime Badge 1556 1655 6% Civilian 44 52 18% Ccmpensatory Time Badge 284 543 91% Sick Leave Drays (Per Employee) Badge 4 3.5 (12%) Civilian 6 6 0 Military Leave Requested 0 0 Military Leave Days Granted 0 0 0 Industrial Leave Cases Reported 2 2 0 Industrial Leave Days Off 30 41 37% CRIMINAL ACTIVI'T'Y Part I Crimes Murder 2 0 (100%) Forcible Rape 1 1 0 Assault to Rape Attempt 0 0 0 Robbery with Firearm 10 9 (10%) Robbery with Knife 0 1 100% Strong-Arm Robbery 2 6 200% Assault with Firearm 1 1 0 Assault with Knife 3 0 (100%) Assault with Other Weapon 7 5 (28%) Assault with Hands/Feet 6 3 (50%) Burglary - Residential 80 56 (30%) Burglary - Coonercial 89 90 1% Arson 2 6 200% MPAL MAJOR PART I CRIMES 203 178 (12%) -15- l auMINAL ACUTVITY (continued) Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease Part I Crimes (continued) Theft - Pocket-picking 4 10 150% Theft - Purse-Snatching 20 4 (80%) Theft - Shoplifting 131 104 (21%) Theft - From Motor Vehicle 124 131 6% Theft - Motor Vehicle Accessories 10 7 (30%) Theft - Bicycles 20 14 (30%) Theft - From Building 20 15 (25%) Theft - From Coin Op. Machines 4 5 25% Theft - All other 115 88 (23%) Stolen Automobiles 48 36 (25%) Stolen Trucks/Buses 15 13 (13%) Other Vehicles Stolen 12 8 (33%) TOM PART I CRIMES 726 613 (16%) Other offenses 1097 1000 (9%) TC)TAL ALL OFFENSES 1823 1613 (12%) NARCOTICS INVESTIGATIONS Male Adult Arrests 41 31 (24%) Male Juvenile Arrests 3 8 167% Female Adult Arrests 8 8 0 Female Juvenile Arrests 0 3 300% 10TAL 52 50 (04%) TT,T. DRUGS SEIZED Heroin 0 .12 0 Cocaine (grams) 131 105.7 (19%) Methamphetamine (grams) 102 132 29% Marijuana (grams) 932 574 (38%) Marijuana (cigarettes) 27 21 (22%) Marijuana (plants) 24 19 (21%) Hashish (grams) 1 3 200% PCP (grams) 0 0 0 LSD (tablets) 145 125 (14%) Psilocybin 0 5.85 T= STREET VALUE $85,340.00 35,631.00 (58%) -16- Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease ARRESTS PATROL Adult Felony 84 102 21% Juvenile Felony 18 30 67% Adult Misdemeanor 587 646 10% Juvenile Misdemeanor 46 48 4% INVESTIGATICNS Adult Felony '34 48 41% Juvenile Felony 10 7 (30%) Adult Misdemeanor 6 9 50% Juvenile Misdemeanor 3 3 0 TOTAL ALL ARRESTS 806 893 11% COMPLAINTS TOTAL COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED Misdemeanors - Patrol 640 523 (18%) Felony - Patrol 70 87 24% Misdemeanors - Investigations 67 48 (28%) Felony - Investigations 65 151 132% TOTAL QaMPLAINIS SUBMI'T'TED 842 809 (4%) TOTAL COMPLAINTS CHARGED Patrol 503 499 (1%) Investigations 91 143 57% TOTAL COMPLAINTS (3muxm 594 642 8% CLEARED CASES Property Assigned 382 444 16% Closed 108 250 132% Closure Rate 28% 56% 100% Checks Assigned 125 113 (10%) Closed 151 132 (13%) Closure Rate 121% 117% (3%) -17- CLEARED CASES (continued) Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease Persons Assigned 185 160 (13%) Closed 138 159 15% Closure Rate 75% 99% 32% Narcotics Assigned 106 122 15% Closed 106 102 (4%) Closure Rate 100% 84% (16%) TRAFFIC Citations Issued Parking 1237 839 (32%) Mechanical 1196 1195 0% Moving 3746 3422 (9%) Total 6179 5456 (12%) Accidents Investigated (Includes Private Property) Fatality Accidents 1 2 100% Injury Accidents 69 57 (17%) Non-Injury Accidents 392 329 (16%) Total Accidents Investigated 462 388 (16%) Accident Types (Excludes Private Property) Auto/Pedestrian 7 1 (86%) Auto/Bicycle 10 9 (10%) Fixed Object 28 35 25% Parked Vehicle 24 38 58% Vehicle/Vehicle 286 231 (19%) -18- TRAFFIC (continued) Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease Accident Causes (Excludes Private Property) Drunk Drivers (DUI) 17 18 6% Speed 110 113 3% Unsafe Turns 56 48 (14%) Mechanical 0 1 100% Traffic Signals (Fail to Obey) 22 28 27% Other 98 65 (34%) Drunk Driving Arrests Male Adult 114 138 21% Female Adult 19 24 26% Male Juvenile 5 0 (100%) Female Juvenile 0 2 100% Total Drunk Driving Arrests 119 164 19% CRDE PREVENTION Residential Safety Neighborhood Watch Meetings 29 16 (45%) Number of Persons Attending 479 238 (50%) Number of Watches in Operation 81 89 10% Security Surveys Conducted 495 265 (46%) Merchant's Program Merchant's Alert Program 20 91 355% Community Awareness Program Radio Community Services Messages 0 0 0 Television Community Service Messages 0 0 0 Newspaper Community Service Messages 15 10 (33%) Interviews 20 20 0 School Presentation 12 2 (83%) Group Talks and Service Organizations 8 8 0 Earthquake Preparedness Presentation 19 6 (68%) -19- CRIME PREVENTION (continued) Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease Safety Literature Crime Prevention Material 5510 3067 (44%) Neighorhood Watch Groups 6930 3716 (46%) Merchant's Alert 100 52 (48%) Commercial Shoplifting 350 429 23% Crime Prevention Information Rack 2750 4050 47% Z= SAFETY LITERATURE 15640 11314 (28%) SERVICE SECTION Citizen Inquiries Telephone Calls 25110 37665 50% Walk-Ins 1926 2889 50% Records Reports Processed 3120 3019 (03%) Alpha Cards Processed 5255 5678 8% Field Interview Cards Processed 699 813 16% Bicycle Cards Processed 81 81 0 Bicycles Processed for Auction 0 49 100% Insurance Company Verification Sent 629 640 2% Total False Alarms Responded to: 554 683 23% Residential 30 40 33% Commercial 524 643 23% Total Pieces of Evidence Processed 1034 1271 23% Permits Bingo Permits 2 2 0 One-Day Liquor License Permits 22 13 (41%) Gun Dealer Permits 3 3 0 Explosive Sales Permits 2 1 (50%) Dance Licenses 0 0 0 Massage Permits 0 0 0 Second-Hand Goods Permits 0 1 100% Parade Permits 3 3 0 Peddlers Permits 0 0 0 VOLUNTEER PROGRAM Reserves 1418 2068 46% Volunteer/Clerical 0 0 0 Crime Prevention/Clerical 18 20 11% Cadet Program 80 0 (100%) Total Volunteer Hours 1516 2088 38% -20- JUVENILE ACTIVITY Percentage 1986 1987 Increase/Decrease Arrests Male Felony 24 32 33% Female Felony 4 5 25% Male Misdemeanor 41 35 (15%) Female Misdemeanor. 26 16 (38%) Total Juvenile Arrests 95 88 (7%) Notice to Appear Male 40 35 (12%) Female 25 13 (48%) Total Notice to Appear 65 48 (26%) Traffic Citations Issued 506 377 (25%) -21 - ;,LICE SERVICES CONTRACT EVALUATION .FORM r 1. Quality of. Service Provided Needs Excellent Adequate Improvement a. Patrol Service b . Traffic Enforcement C . Criminal Investigation d. Juvenile Investigation e. Narcotics Investigation f. Community Programs (1) Crime Prevention (2 ) Bicycle Safety ( 3 ) School Liaison g . Business Office Services Comments s _ r h. What additional Police services or programs, if any, need to be provided? 1, 2 . Public Relations and Communication ; i a. Does the Police Department through patrol' service and community programs make enough contact with the following groups? .Excellent Sufficient Insu`ficient `� Contact Contact CU—n-act Citizens I __ i Merchants Schools is b. Is the Police 2artment effective in its :sentation and r dissemination of information to the public? Effective Not Effective C . Has the Police Department done an effective job in increasing the visibility and identification of police service with the City of Dublin? 5 Effective Not effective Comments 3 . Administrative Services a. Is there sufficient communication of police activities to: Needs Excellent Adequate Improvement City Manager City Council b. Does the Police Department Administration administer the contract in an effective manner and with a spirit of cooperation? Yes Needs Improvement C . Does the Department adequately identify and communicate the police service needs to the City? Yes No Comments Overall Performance