HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.5 Bldg Law Enforcement Contract Review CITY OF DUBLIN
q�45-
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 21 , 1988
SUBJECT Taugher & Associates, Inc. , Building Law Enforcement
Services Contract Evaluation
EXHIBITS ATTACHED 1 ) Current Agreement for Building Law Enforcement
Services
2) 1987 Amendment to Agreement
3) 1988 Proposed Amendment to Agreement
4) Memoranda from Vic Taugher dated March 16 & 28 ,
1988 and attachments
5) Building Law Enforcement Services Contract
Evaluation Form
RECOMMENDATION 4\ 0: 1 ) Review performance of Taugher & Associates
2) Approve Amendment to Agreement and authorize
Mayor to execute said Agreement
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: See Below
DESCRIPTION Taugher & Associates has provided the following
services to the City : 1 ) Administration of the Building & Safety
Department ; 2) Plan Checking ; 3) Building Inspection; 4) Housing Code
Enforcement ; 5) Zoning Enforcement.
Contract Review
The City annually evaluates contracts for the purpose of: 1) reviewing the
performance of the Contractor during the previous year ; 2) identifying any
areas where the service might be improved; and 3) evaluating the cost-
effectiveness of the contract .
Attached to the Agenda Statement is a Contract Evaluation Form for Building
Law Enforcement Services . The City Manager has utilized the criteria in the
evaluation form to complete the following evaluation of Building Law
Enforcement Services :
Contract Compliance
Has the Contractor complied with the conditions set forth in the Agreement
in the following areas? Plan Review - Yes Building Inspection - Yes
Zoning Enforcement - Yes Housing Code Enforcement - Yes
Availability
Has the Contractor been- adequately available to the public , developers ,
builders and staff , i . e. , adequate office hours? The Building & Safety
Department Business Office is open from 8: 00 a.m. to 5: 00 p.m. , 5 days a
week . During this time , there is always someone available to handle permit
applications and answer common building and safety questions . The office
hours of the Building Official are typically 8: 00 a.m. to 12:00 noon , Monday
through Friday. The office hours for the Building Inspection Staff are
typically 8 :00 a .m. through 10 :00 a .m. , Monday through Friday . Appointments
can be made with the Building Official and Building Inspector to discuss
more detailed and complex building issues . The City Manager ' s Office has
received few complaints regarding the adequacy of the office hours for the
Building & Safety Department .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO. !
The Zoning Investigator ' s regular hours are 8 :00 a .m. to 5 :00 p .m. , Monday
and Tuesday . A total of approximately 960 hours are proposed for Fiscal
Year 1988-89 .
Responsiveness
Has Contractor processed plans , made inspections and responded to inquiries
within a reasonable time? In Staff ' s view, the Contractor has performed on
a timely basis . Although we have received an occasional complaint , we have
received many more positive comments from the development community , as well
as residents . A few of these positive written communications have been
attached to the Memorandum from Vic Taugher dated March 16, 1988.
Inter-Departmental Coordination
Does the Contractor make an effort to work with other City Departments in
the coordination of common projects? The Contractor has met, on a regular
basis , with the City Manager and other Departmental Managers to discuss
inter-departmental issues . In addition , during Fiscal Year 1987-88 , the
Building Official assisted in the review of the Civic Center plans which
added a great deal of workload for the Building Official . He has also
closely coordinated his review of the Residential & Commercial Sprinkler
Ordinance with the Fire Department .
Public Relations
Does Contractor ' s action result in complaints regarding the professionalism
or courtesy exercised by Contractor? As indicated above , given the nature
of the service provided and the broad range of situations that the
Department must encounter , it ' s my belief that the overall public relations
for the Building & Safety Department has been excellent. Once again, this
is evidenced by positive phone calls and written communications that my
office has received regarding their service.
Cost Effectiveness
Are the costs of services managed effectively and kept within the revenue
generated by the function? Is the contract still the most cost-effective
means of providing Building & Safety Services? The cost of services
provided by Taugher & Associates for Fiscal Years 1983-84 through 1986-87 ,
as well as the Budget - for Fiscal Year 1987-88 are identified below:
TAUGHER & ASSOCIATES
COST FOR SERVICES
Actual Actual Actual Actual Estimated
1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88
Administration $18 , 308 $13 ,031 $13 , 500 $20, 028 $20, 777
Plan Review 20 , 709 55 , 697 47 , 926 62 , 635 77 , 657
Building Regulations 36 , 954 73 , 981 96 , 291 123, 898 180 , 050
Total Bldg & Safety $75 , 971 $142 , 709 $157 , 717 $206 , 561 $278 , 484
Zoning Enforcement 15 , 885 19 , 424 28 , 535 61 , 221 38 , 522
Total Taugher & Assoc . $91 , 856 $162 , 133 $186, 252 $267 , 782 $317 ,006
Contract Cost
In addition to the cost of services provided by Taugher & Associates , the
City also incurred the following direct costs related to the support of the
the Building & Safety function :
Actual Actual Actual Actual Estimated
1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88
Building & Safety
Support Services $24, 549 $30, 612 $319435 $38 , 550 $40, 252
The total costs attributable to the Building & Safety function , exluding
overhead costs are shown below:
Actual Actual Actual Actual Estimated
1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88
Contract Bldg/Safety Costs $75, 971* $142, 709 $157 , 717 $206, 561 $289,000
City Support Costs 24 , 549 30,612 31 ,435 38 , 550 40, 252
Total Bldg/Safety Costs $100, 520 $173 , 321 $189, 152 $245 , 111 $329 , 252
Total Revenue 334, 952 320,059 400, 961 567 , 615 527 ,000
Difference +$234 ,432 +$146, 738 +$211 , 809 +$322, 504 +$197, 748
# Includes 11 months of Contract Service .
In any event , the fees charged by Taugher & Associates have remained within
the Building Permit fee structure which has not changed since incorporation .
Contract Vs. City Building & Safety Services
Shown below are the historical costs and hours worked for the Building
Official and Building Inspection/Zoning Enforcement Services (combined) from
1983-84 to 1987-88 (Estimated) .
Building Offical
**Actual Actual Actual Actual Estimated
1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88
Hours Worked 742 1122 942 1189.5 1360.5
Cost $42, 564 $68, 727 $61 ,426 $82, 859 $98, 434
BUILDING INSPECTION/ZONING ENFORCEMENT
**Actual Actual Actual Actual Estimated
1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88
Hours Worked 1600. 2 2421 . 2 3172 4378 4841 .5
Cost $57 ,642 $93, 404 $124,826 185, 119 $218, 572
#* Since Taugher and Associates contract only covered 11 months of Fiscal
Year 1983-84, the hours worked and costs were adjusted to reflect 12 months
for purposes of comparison.
In order to provide the same level of service with City employees , the
following costs would have had to been incurred during Fiscal Year 1987-88.
Item Est . Cost
1987-88
( 1) Building Official $70,000
( 1 ) Sr . Building Inspector 58, 000
( 2) Building Inspector/Code
Enforcement Officers 100, 000
Vehicle Expense 7 , 500
Service & Supply Expense not
incurred under contract 2 , 500
Indirect Cost (Addt ' l insurance
personnel , finance admin . ) 10,000
Back-up Plan Check coverage
in absence of Bldg . Official 29 , 500
$277 , 500
Contract Service Cost $317 ,006
Contract Savings ( $39 , 506)
As indicated above , the City would have saved approximately $39, 506 in
1987-88 with in-house Building and Safety function. However , because
construction activity may vary from year-to-year , one needs to compare in-
house vs . contract Building and Safety Services over time .
Shown below is a comparison of savings realized or additional costs which
the City would have incurred if Building & Safety Services were provided
in-house .
Year (Savings)/Cost
1983-84 $40 , 494
1984-85 21 , 067
1985-86 1 , 748
1986-87 (26 , 282)
1987-88* (39, 506)
1988-89* (30, 400)
Total ($32,879)
# Estimated
In reviewing the historical information , Staff has determined that Contract
Building & Safety Services are cost effective when construction activity is
low or moderate . In years in which construction activity is high (i. e.
1986-87 to 1988-89) , in-house Building & Safety Services are more cost
effective.
In discussing the potential future construction activity with Building and
Planning , it is too early to determine if and when there will be a dip in
construction activity between the time construction in the City ' s primary
planning area ends and construction in the City ' s extending planning area
begins. If by the end of Fiscal Year 1988-89 , construction in the extended
planning areas becomes more certain, it is recommended that consideration be
given to planning the development of an in-house Building and Safety
function in order to achieve greater cost effectiveness.
1988-89 Proposed Contract
Taugh.er and Associates has proposed new rates for Fiscal Year 1988-89 as
indicated in the March 28, 1988 memorandum from Vic Taugher . The proposed
rates upcoming Fiscal Year are as follows :
Position Proposed Rate Increase in Rate
Building Official $73.50/hr . $3.50/hr (5%)
Building Inspector $46 .00/hr . $2. 25/hr (5. 1%)
Zoning Investigator $37 . 50/hr . -0-
Insurance $16 ,000/yr . -0-
The increases proposed by the Contractor appear to be reasonable .
Recommendation
Based on the overall quality and level of professionalism which has been
provided by the Contractor , it is Staff ' s recommendation that the City
Council review the performance of the Contractor and approve an amendment to
the Contractor ' s existing Agreement for Fiscal Year 1988-89.
AGREEMENT
FOR
BUILDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 1st day of August 1983 ,
by and between the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as the "City" , and Taugher & Associates, an Individual,
hereinafter referred to as the "Building Official" .
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Building Official has submitted to the City a proposal to
provide building law enforcement services to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is advantageous and in the
best interest of the City to enter into the Agreement hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and
covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows :
1 . Building Inspection Services . Building Official shall enforce the
provisions of the City' s Building, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical and
Housing Codes ; the City' s Zoning Ordinance; and related State laws .
Building Official shall make such inspections and investigations as may
be required to effect such enforcement and issue permits as are
required by City' s Ordinances and Codes . Such enforcement shall
include the duties as set forth in' the Ordinance of the City for the
Building Official and in the performance of such work, the employees of
the Building Official .shall do the following:
a. Plan Review. Building Official shall review the plans
prepared by or on behalf of private developers for compliance with
applicable State and City ordinances and regulations . Building
Oficial shall maintain close liaison with the City's Planning
Director in order that the appropriate requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance are incorporated within such building plans . Building
Official shall arrange review by other appropriate agencies having
'jurisdiction in such matters relative to enforcement of fire
codes , sanitation codes and health codes . When satisfied that the
appropriate requirements of the City' s codes have been met,
Building Official shall issue permits as set forth in such codes .
b . Building Inspection. Building Official shall provide
building inspection service during the course of construction of
private facilities to enforce compliance with the provisions of
the applicable State and City ordinances and regulations set forth
on the plans for which the permit is issued. In the performance
of such duties , Building Official shall provide prompt inspection
for each project at the completion of the various stages of
construction to determine compliance.
C . Zoning Enforcement. Building Official shall provide
enforcement of all aspects of the City' s Zoning Ordinance and will
make all necessary investigations and follow-up inspections to
assure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and the conditions of
approval of various variances, conditional use permits , site
reviews and other zoning approvals . Enforcement will include
preparation of cases for citation hearings and criminal
proceedings in municipal court.
Building Official shall perform other activities as directed
by the City.
d. Housing Code Enforcement. Building Official shall enforce
the City ' s Housing Code by investigation of complaints regarding
sub-standard housing conditions and where necessary, prepare cases
for citation hearings, criminal proceedings in municipal court,
and civil abatement proceedings .
Building Official shall perform other activities as directed
by the City. a IN
Page 1
e. Facilities for Records . The City shall provide an office for
conducting the duties set forth in this Agreement, and shall
provide necessary furnishings, telephone, permit forms and codes .
Within this office, Building Official shall assemble such records
customarily maintained by a City Building Department. Such
records shall, at all times, be the property of the City.
2 . Ccllection of Fees . All fees to be collected in connection with
the carrying out of the functions set forth above, shall be collected
by the City. Building Official shall review the appropriate ordinances
and fee schedules in effect by the City, and shall compute the amount
of such fees to be collected by the City.
3 . Compensation to Building Official. Building Official shall be
compensated monthly for services rendered in accordance with the
schedule contained on Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto.
4 . General Conditions .
a. Avoidance of Conflicts . During the life of this Agreement,
Building Official shall not provide services to any client for a
project which requires any permit or approval from the City.
b. Compliance with Laws . Building Official, his agents and
employees, shall comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and
regulations of the State, County, the City of Dublin, and all
governing bodies having jurisdiction applying to work done or to
be done under the Agreement.
C . Insurance and Indemnification. Building Official shall
assume liability and pay all costs of defense, including legal
fees and court costs, and hold the City harmless from loss,
damages , costs or expenses caused by any negligent or wrongful
acts , errors, or omissions of Building Official' s officers,
employees and agents which may occur in the performance of the
terms , duties and obligations of this Agreement. Building
Official shall provide a certificate of insurance to the City, to
be included as part of this Agreement, which will give evidence of
general liability insurance of not less than $1,000, 000 .00 for
personal injury, accidental death and property damage; and further
provide to the City a Certificate of Insurance, which gives
evidence of automobile liability insurance coverage of not less
than $1, 000 , 000 . 00 for personal injury and accidental death, and
$50, 000 . 00 for property danage per occurrence. City shall be
named as an additional insured in any such liability insurance
policy. Building Official shall pay all premiums for said
insurance .
Building Official shall also provide the City with a
certificate of insurance, to be included as part of this
Agreement, which will give evidence that Building Official ' s
employees are covered by worker' s compensation insurance .
All certificates of insurance which are a part of this
Agreement shall be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney
as to form and content .
d. Assignability . Building Official shall not assign this
contract without prior written consent of the City.
e . Clerical Support. City agrees to provide adequate clerical
support to the Building Department function as mutually agreed
upon by City and Building Official .
f . Subcontractor . The name, background and experience of any
and every firm to which any work outlined in these specifications
is to be sub-contracted by the person or firm to which the' prime
agreement is awarded must be submitted to the City Manager for his
approval . Unless a sub-contract is approved by the City Manager,
the holder of the prime agreement must do all the work outlined in
these specifications , using his own equipment and personnel . It
must be clearly understood that the holder of the prime agreement,
Page 2
irrespective of approved sub-contract, will b Id entirely
responsible for the quality and quantity c._ work to be done under
the terms of the agreement. No sub-contract to do any work
outlined in these specifications is to run longer than one year,
and the extension or renewal of any such sub-contract agreement
can only be made with the approval of the City Manager. The
agreement will not be assignable in whole or part, without the
express written approval of the City Manager.
5 . Responsible Individual. The individual directly responsible for
the performance of the duties of Building Official as hereabove set
forth shall be Victor L. Taugher, a California Registered Civil
Engineer, License #9556, and Fire Protection Engineer License #911.
Upon mutual agreement and direction of the City Manager, Building
Official may substitute other individuals in the above capacity as
responsible individual.
6 . Term of Agreement.
a. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective until
terminated. This Agreement may be cancelled by the City, upon
thirty (30) days advance written notice. This Agreement may be
cancelled by Building Official upon ninety (90) days advance
written notice.
b. Notices . Any written notices to the parties hereto shall be
sufficient if they are deposited in the United States Post Office,
in envelopes, postage prepaid by registered or certified mail
addressed as follows :
City: City of Dublin
PO Box 2340
Dublin, California 94568
Building Official: Taugher & Associates
18681 Vineyard Road
Castro Valley CA 94546
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in
duplicate at Dublin, California, the day and. year first above written.
CITY OF DUBL-
By
M or
ATTEST:
City C e k
TAUGHER & ASSOCIATES
BY /.
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
RATE SCHEDULE
CLASSIFICATION FEE RATE PER HOUR
Building Inspector $ 43.75
Inspection 43.75
Housing & Zoning Enforcement 43.75
Plan Checking (Residential & Non Structural
Commercial & Industrial P1an .Checking) 43.75
'Principal Building Official ,
Inspection 43.75
Housing &Zoning Enforcement 43.75
Plan Checking (Complex Residential, Commercial &
Industrial Buildings) 70.00
.Supervision & Administration •70. 00 **
Zoning Investigator
Zoning Enforcement 37.50
This rate schedule will be effective for the period beginning on
August 1, 1987 and ending on July 31, 1988. The rates will be
adjusted thereafter annually, as mutually agreed upon by the
Building Official and the City of Dublin.
In the event that the Building Official is requested to perform
services in excess of forty (40) hours in any one (1) week, or in
the event that there is an emergency requirement for the services
of the Building Official and the City is reimbursed for said
services, the Building Official shall be compensated at 1 1/2
times the above hourly rate.s . Standard rates will apply for
Building Official ' s attendance at Planning Commission and City
Council meetings .
* An additional insurance surcharge of $3 . 00/hour not to exceed
the actual increased 1986-87 and 1987-88 insurance premium
costs or $16, 000, whichever is less .
** Supervision duties include review and coordination of work
performed by Inspectors and clerical support staff.
Administrative duties include City Council and Commission
meeting attendance when requested, meetings with applicants
and developers, inter-agency coordination and coordination
with Staff, development of office procedures , operations ,
etc .
CITY OF DUBLIN AND TAUGHER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR BUILDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred to as "City"),
and Taugher & Associates , Inc. (hereinafter referred to as
"BUILDING OFFICIAL") , first entered into an Agreement August 1 ,
1983 to provide Building Law Enforcement, Services to the City of
Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the fees established in Exhibit A of the original
agreement were to be annually reviewed and adjusted as mutually
agreed upon by the Building Official and the City; and
WHEREAS, an adjustment of fees for services has been made by the
City on an annyual basis in the past;: and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to continue contracting for services
from Building Official; and
WHEREAS, an adjustment of fees for services rendered is desired
by both the City and Building Official.
NOW, THEREFORE the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION I. ADJUSTMENT OF RATES
The Taugher & Associates, Inc. hourly rate schedule (Exhibit A)
shall replace the rate schedule which was adopted by the City
Council and became effective August 1 , 1987.
The change in rate shall be effective August 1. 1988 and shall
continue in effect until rescinded or amended by the City
Council , according to the provisions of the agreement.
CITY OF DUBLIN
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
TAUGHER & ASSOCIATED, INC.
Victor L. Taugher
EXHIBIT A
RATE SCHEDULE
CLASSIFICATION FEE RATE PER HOUR*
Building Inspector $ 46.00
Inspection 46.00
Housing & Zoning Enforcement 46.00
Plan Checking (Residential & Non Structural
Commercial & Industrial Plan Checking) 46.00
Principal Building Official
Inspection 46.00
Housing & Zoning Enforcement 46.00
Plan Checking (Complex Residential, Commercial
& Industrial Buildings) 73.50
Supervision & Administration 73.50
Zoning Investigator
Zoning Enforcement 37.50
This rate schedule will be effective for the period beginning on
August 1 , 1988 and ending on July 31 , 1989. The rates will be
adjusted thereafter annually, as mutually agreed upon by the
Building Official and the City of Dublin.
In the event that the Building Official is requested to perform
services in excess of forty (40) hours in any one (1) week, or in
the event that there is an emergency requirement for the services
of the Building Official and the City is reimbursed for said
services, the Building Official shall be compensated at 1 1/2
times the above hourly rates. Standard rates will apply for
Building Official ' s attendance at Planning Commission and City
council meetings .
An additional insurance surcharge of $3.00/hour not to exceed
the actual increased 1988-89 insurance premium costs or
$16,000, whichever is less.
Supervision duties include review and coordination of work
performed by Inspectors and clerical support staff.
Administrative duties include City Council and Commission
meeting attendance when requested , meetings with applicants
and developers , inter-agency coordination and coordination
with Staff , development of office procedures, operations ,
etc .
Taugher and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
P.O.BOX 20232 AREA CODE 413
18681 VINEYARD ROAD 537.2283
CASTRO VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 94546
March 16, 1988.
To: Richard Ambrose, City Manager
From: Victor Taugher, Building Official
Subject: Building Inspection Department 1986-87 Year End Report
During the past year construction has continued to increase. The
attached activity report indicates the increases.
The following major projects have been completed or are mear
completion.
1 . Beck Homes Tract
2. Castle Construction Tract
3. Estate Homes Tract
4. Coral Gate Condos
5. Automation Electronics Office, Phase II
6. Hexel Laboratory Addition
7. Valley Valvo Dealership
8. Admiral Van & Storage
In addition the following has been accomplished :
1 . Completion of the abatement of the Nichandros property
2. Developement and adoption of an infraction ordinance and
procedures
3. Adoption of a swimming pool fencing and house numbering
ordinances
4. Survey of all illegal and non-conforming signs and send-
ing notices to owners of all illegal signs
In closing I want to express my appreciation to you and the City
Councit for the support recerived. It is gratifying to know that
the City of Dublin supports strong enforcement of Building
Regulations and the Zoning Ordinance.
BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
1986-87 ACTIVITY REPORT
1984 - 85 1985 - 86 1986 - 87
Building Regulation
Valuation $35,085,685 $ 48,871 ,059 $56,724, 129
Permit fees 330,560 403,510 576,615
Permits issued 728 868 1 , 193
Inspections 3,924 5,509 6,542
Days worked 249 253 297.5
Hours in field 1 ,433.25 1 ,706.6 2, 157.55
Hours/day 5.76 6.96 7.25
Inspector office hrs. 492.4 627.35 636.45
Hours/day 1 .98 2.48 2. 14
Inspections/day 15.8 21.77 21 .99
Inspections/hour 2.7 3.13 3.03
Inspections/permit 5. 1 6.35 5.48
Contract cost $ 142 , 709 $ 157 , 717 $206 , 561
Cost/inspection $36.37 $28.63 $31 .57
Zoning Enforcement
Violations or complaints
Cases pending 61 107 91
Cases received 177 225 232
Cases closed 131 241 208
Cases pending 107 91 115
Investigations 384 1092 1573
Hours in field 103.5 189 323
Office hours 326.5 551 .5 1258
Hours/investigation 1 . 1 .68 .94
Contract Cost $19,424 $28,535 $61 ,222
Cost/inspection 50.56 26. 13 38.92
Tau her and Associates Inc. MAR 2 81988
g Q/TY OF DUB
CONSULTING ENGINEERS r,A
P.O.BOX 20232 AREA CODE 418
18881 VINEYARD ROAD 537.2288
CASTRO VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 94548
MEMORANDUM
March 28, 1988.
To : Richard Ambrose , City Manager
From: Victor L. Taugher, Building Official
i
Subject: 1987 - 88 Contract Review and
1988 - 89 Proposal for Services
1 . Proposed 1988 - 89 contract
A. Proposed Rates
It is proposed that the basic rate for inspection
services be increased as follows:
Current Rate Proposed Rate
Building Official $ 70.00 $ 73.50
Building Inspector 43.75 46.00
Zoning Investigator 37.50 37.50
City subsidy for liability
Insurance 16,000.00 16,000.00
The proposed increase for Building Official and
Building Inspector is approximately 5 %. No increase
is proposed for the Zoning Investigator.
B. Insurance
I have discussed insurance rates with my broker. It is
too early to obtain definite information, but it is
estimated that the cost will be $60,000.00 this year .
The following is the cost of my errors and omissions
insurance with the City Contributions :
1985-85 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89
Insurance cost $28,645 $40,067 $46,320.77 $60,000
City Cost 0 12,000 16,000
Increase 25.865 11 , 422 6,554 13,679
of increase
paid by city 0 105% 61%
It is requested that the City subsidize insurance costs
this year in the amount of $ 16, 000.00 with the
insurance surcharge to be at the rate of $3.00 per
hour.
C. Staffing Levels
Staffing levels projection for next year are as
follows :
Actual • Budget Proposed
1987 - 88 1987 - 88 1988 - 89
(8 months)
Bldg. Official (hrs) 1047.5 1014 1000
Bldg. Inspector 2583.3 4536 4250
Zon. Investigator 666 960 960
The following projects are about to begin in the order
listed
1 . Kildara (Morrison Honmes) 174 Units
2. Pulte Homes 25 homes
3. Standard Pacific 132 units
4. Alamo Creek Village 1 56 units
5. Bordaux Estates 21 homes
6. Valley. Christian Center Classrooms & gym
7. Restaurant
issued July 30, 1987 to beat school development
fees.
Later in the year the following projects will come on
line
1 . Heritage Commons 230 units
2. Alamo Creek (Village 3, 4 or 5)
3. Albertson Addition Grocery store
4. Rainbow Investment Commercial bldg.
5 . Public Storage Mini storage
6. Scottsman Office and shop
These projects will require the above staffing levels.
D. Changes in Work Method
We are looking foreward to an automated land
information system and permit system which
hopefully will be up and running in 1989-90.
E. Agreement amendment
Attached is a revised Rate Schedule.
2. 1987 - 88 Contract Review
A. 1986 - 87 Fiscal Year Report_
— Tttache-d is- Ch—el 986 - 87 Fiscal Year report of
Building Inspection gepartment Activity.
B. Statistical projection
1986-87 1987-88 1988-89
Bldg. Permit revenue $ 567,615 $ 535,000 & 340,000
Bldg . Valuation 56,724,129 63,000,000 45 ,000,000
Permits 1,193 1 , 100 800
Inspections (Bldg) 6,542 9,000 8,400
if (Zon. ) 1 ,573 1 ,700 1 ,700
Residential units
completed 196 500 450
Zoning investigations 1,573 1 ,700 1 ,700
Cases pending beginning
of year 91 115 105
New cases* 232 250 250
Cases closed 208 260 260
Cases pending ending
of year 115 105 95
C. Self Evaluation
Building Inspection Services have been provided in a
timely manner in the last year. In July an influx of
permits were submitted in order to beat the imposition
of School Developement Fees . These permits were
processed so that all applications affected were issued
prior to the deadline. Services are being provided
efficiently as indicated by the statistical data
included in this report. Copies of letters and
messages regarding services are also attached.
The sign enforcement program is proceeding as scheduled
and all illegal signs except for 16 properties have
been corrected. Notices regarding non-conforming signs
have gone out and enforcement will begin next spring.
Enforcement of the Property maintenance ordinance will
bring new challenges and successes.
In conclusion, I believe that Contract performance has
been carried out in an exemplary manner.
3
D. Cost of Service
Actual 1986-87 Budget 1987-88
Cost
Administration &
Plan Review $ 82,859.00 $ 71 ,000.00
Bldg . Inspection 123,702.00 198,000.00
Bldg. & Safety
Contract Cost $ 206,561 .00 $ 269,000.00
Zoning Enforcement $ 61 ,222.00 $ 36,000.00
Insurance Surcharge $ 16,000.00
Total Contract Cost $ 267,783.00 $ 321 ,000.00
City Support 37, 198.00 42.252.00
$ 304,981 .00 $ 363.898.00
Hours
Bldg. Official 1192.5 1014
Bldg. Inspection 2794 4536
Zoning Investigation 1581 960
included in above costs
4
FRANK RUPERT BRYANT - ARCHITECT
1533 NORTH MAIN STREET
WALNUT CREEK. CA 94596
TELEPHONE: 14151 945-6538
5 August 1987 �� �, ' iy;�
!,(Jlh G
Mr. Victor Taugher
City of Dublin
Der
Building Inspection Department T
6500 Dublin Boulevard
Dublin, CA 94568
Dear Vic,
On behalf of the Owner, Douglas Bradford & Associates, I
would like to thank you and your staff for your cooperation
and assistasnce in enabling us to obtain a building permit
for 6000 Dougherty Road. With your help, we were able to
meet the deadline imposed upon the Owner by his lending
Institution and proceed with the project .
Again , thank you for your assistance.
Since ly i
,7e
Michael Corrick
Project Architect
January 11 , 1988
RECE lye
p
Mr . Richard Ambrose VAN 13
City Manager Cry OF D1N
City Of Dublin
6500 Dublin Blvd.
Dublin . Ca 94568
Re : Mr . Robert White
City Inspection Dept .
Dear Mr . Ambrose:
This Is Just a short note to let you know how
helpful and courteous Mr . White has been .
My husband and I have a problem with a neighbor
and his swimming pool and " falling down° fence .
In trying to correct this problem Mr . White has
been very helpful , courteous and patient . We
appreciate his .professional conduct and thought
It appropriate to inform you of it .
Mr . White Is the only City employee we have ever
had any direct contact with and If he is a good
example of Dublin City employees. then we
commend you for your staffing.
Sincerely .
A -
V
Mrs. Jan Guc ke
Mr . & Mrs . Harold D. Gurske
• 6686 Ebensburg Lane
Dublin , Ca 94568
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Cece Farias
ob
ar. de Roque
FRO ichard C. Ambrose, City Manager
DA November 12, 1987
Very seldom do people who work with our Staff take the
opportunity to express their appreciation for the hard work. and
professionalism displayed by our Staff.
I want to personally let you know how much I appreciate your
efforts, not only with respect to Janet Heffington's individual
situation, but to the high quality of work that you provide for
the City on a day-to-day basis.
I am glad to have you on the City of Dublin Staff team.
Keep up the good work!
RCA:kk
cc: C. Farias Personnel File
Taugher & Associates, Inc. , Contract File
City Council
Richard C . Ambrose
6500 Dublin Blvd .
Room 205 OAT, 2 3 1987
Dublin , CA. 94568 rz ,pr
October 21 , 1987
Mr. Ambrose :
For the last year I have had construction in progress at the
property located at 7816 Shannon Ave , Dublin . This project.
was through Alameda County Housing & Development . Unfortunately
for all I have not had a good contractor. When this job started
BOB WHITE was the inspector . Had it not been for his careful
inspection and rechecking what the contractor said was done I
think we would have had a real mess . Toward the end of the job
EARL DeROQUE has been the inspector. The above statements
regarding WHITE also apply to DeROQUE. This contractor has tried
to pull every trick in the book , not withstanding putting the
outlet for the stove in the kitchen drawer. The job had 30 day
completion and is now nearing a year .
Again I cannot say enough for your two inspectors and had it not
been for their diligence and knowledge I would have had a very
unsafe home .
I further wish to bring to your attention CeCe Farios whose help
was outstanding . I have had to make many visits to the office
and have talked with her many times . I needed original home/tract
documents which she was able to find for me.
I request that you commend WHITE , DeROQUE and FARRIOS for a fine job
and let them know they are appreciated . I further request that you
place a copy of this letter in each of their personnel files with
a written commendation .
Thank you for a fine staff .
/J . L . Heffington
0
1 N
'Yti AJ •trt. '1 .��• '?r �• ,,W„"'S f•• Yit3+�t'" f C ��li' �C .i
� r � � � 7 + .�• ter. 1 t is�`.� � jt���.i_q t � fi' >'C'' r�
Fc'iS.. a: •-��r • "i L .y�y '��� i� {3 vr:w���' l)V-•, r ,� 4-� •fY<�' i � •���
:1�'r� xrr°•✓ �,•y�.s•Sa♦.La '�:• �s s•= •+- fr>3.YM,y't,0:vft� 'a.'L <. .- H is d• i -'C
y «
iec a ' ;�� t lrYtT •�` Z-;°�� �'? ,7:ifyr �7>aii':Fj �„
Jy, ..••'1` v`-+, .,rr':'a•«` ,,Ei+ 'iSy�a`, =^ �^ _ x'' I •�5 , s ,, J Ta r
lyF?•:y��t; t�� ��
s ,� r. •.^Y ^S P T r s, �Y `lre3 +t;tu''1 t (� •r ''`t.,. s ' ' v -
Jp.,Jirf4 v<L. •:�. .�17,F yc -h°LY.� �, �' f,. ...t`r' �' w.
� (� ,r �.✓ti ,�y yreti^. ,<. WPM
��..�f t.i'���i=lt t•.µ ^' j• ...-`'ti+�=�'�LS'£ �f"�u,>.;'�'<±r! _ "r" ` s '-'F✓.f}r'.-1��.�f.KS'Y - ;+.�.ryy��.vr�o�:•`.3
4."*S q '• dw `PQn^�'t:.:,es'f' •Q
'rlrSr.•Y::r,�" .�"t�'e+,<lt L. •re�,dry'F-'•• � `� .i:�`
xg
�� -?'. 'Et�� ��• `�'r't,.••. ��r •t�Y aq'r/'�'� ,
Q
���,.° '� - :° _` , ...•-r.,.c:•pu J' .,, , 'a,', � .�1�4 y�-4,r is , ` PO!1A\V T'
E, '
.... '
�+y�. s'i+=�:: .
.r-�, 3at,+v+ 1.-at ixr•• �.. >� -s-.q,/t t�..z }, I � ••V:
�"D �;�'`f•'}i;...,��„�..� ° in -�'� ,,K�.fig-`s•^i�'<:..�:77"�1:--'��t,.%
at }`S ^' c- is is � ;'Tv` DATES TIME }// ►
IN
zt�"•tt�-�"3'z��•',3����``� -��'�`s�7�:z -'-'i�ti��t_��z-�"i'.'a�=�'-�,:�+f �..+
-�'.f�:=,1'"`Y.=4,r��'r�7,.�y�� Y••, 5��`t�'',-•( �'C���+��'`,.:_.7: ?,-�.:J•'� r M ,v :f
y > r•>t�Y.F+aT °"sfa`�?�:tr .- w�_ a-t^�-'`fit'-l•-s, L .• •' *' ,�• - �r J'i2-_ .++',�-sw ,y ..ks c�� a_ ;r,;:> yYE.Y"_'r_�_.• -�. 'tE _ --.
,l •T •J3:
-�;t �3 ':tK�`r d ,;.-r •t��f s*?�'"f t" '`,:J•
'?_ a r;,, G ��»i yiJ'�f}''-r.+�'T..�..f'Z'�i -._ t•a .� PHOE • _ • - _ i�s�y��
.?^ M 7'? - ♦t ,�', t••+yy .y36/:iy'.'.2� S,.,r A•�_S.i r j ._.:,.y -r icT Z:N'aEA + �� iXTF1'LSfOIJ q•
'wY i .s '-° s i a�lnaw`"t• �• r<' CDDE
,.7_T..i +�-x' 1, rwr4r --,.�767,(t i�'�+;•�.-:.'�+!^ >i••-y: .� 31 �'�'t.'sFrr�•al i i.NUMBEA 9r- r
3r!r'�3e�j.r 3 _ J ASS tea.-.�YsE'c'r.- •,r�.T�?.i .r r a _tt,YC r'� � '�=".L.,.:r-1fc��t �Yw'�a•.v.•:I.-
•:rr a Y:4 � �lri+�nf{•Yia�..��+•c fZz tea,+. �., ��. .
r�S �•-ir t y� �.„ CAME M S'EE
,a,�••r��r. _ •y ti Y �� �RnK+aL•Z� fps• Jam. _ > h AeG.�iriFa `AGAU11 f
:i': �.•- $ :.�. ?' •! r ��, r ��_- ", ':r` i .-•t.s Y ANTS, _
S,�Y ��. tI� j•-t ¢.?<<K' �'tji�C' ..1�r '� .� �" JpV 4 ti-r.sa. .� -
_ „a '•yam-''h a�hs J"�r `, �!�\iMf�7
YOUA
,mac. r T � , i'r.�' _� !� ti T•- yw ~ _ p. � � +.-1 v� �.�3����7�`�'' y, 1-. ^�,•;�, r-- r
•.r Y ✓'� -_�_�•%�•<'� +r�Y�'•''•a t< ••y.r C -Y ►= MESS- -' '\4aC � t-ri♦!l. �, yiy�'iF
7. ,!'. � .��.-.'..w. (f.•f. 1„'i•fit- S � •"'T, _ . � T�
�M-�.�,-, 1.i Si a �'�i,� 'i ... ` i iI'• 1'S,ty ' _Y
jy/ J�
.Y....+�Y•�' :-'. c; + :.+yi:c`is,'.� .:�.��r�?y°..�..Z��K<'L��. S.�`r c 'i 4C'N;+�`� `y- r 3'_�t. ;, '['tt4� •, • +8t"•' •a 1.
�r%,�`" ..r,..•"a fI ',1.i.'~• _:w`-+� p ti.-,.i t > ,^w�.t.,wt. A. �.` 3'`U1
-.'`•::a>.a 4.c:-� -c• .+w...f .µ�` { jy-YL`••.. t• Y <'�5i ..; Z�. 2; J�� �. ^a
•_a.:'!4J 7 V•G:.-1`:1 J�1�1. �Y .n.�^4 ia��a.l Yj. Y4 L.� - .L�. t",M t!.++� � � '����a�.r^ '. �=�� rMjy!• (/� ..,�
ti
•`a_w J; .� • h.4J _ '„r,Y2 je .r�-�"•-•�•�:'•w��" J.TIt 4 1. f � - Z ' L V,C`C",,..� ,,s.f�
•f.-'�:t�.y _s r. -J a 1• _ '• ^ak •V.�\ i' « �.f ^f t t ... i�SSKb, � ��t/,�-f.-�� _
-i�: .i a , ' J.arXr +y'.✓ ` .. ,F't. llo : t-.njL6+•4' N�,t� '}ayy\ -' .ate " 'f.l
it a - , at <;.-r.t�af ray° h-.t4�'tc _i r'^ 'Y Mve. yr�,�,��.rr!`_y�vy (��`,., `'• + . '- �/ -t''�z `fT
ty • i*.* <. ,f:v�.s." i ar f,• .•s"J�-. x 7 y,�x
c ` y S 3 • t' tr}` ■ tLkd a �rti x.tGtki?:..< �5�• G4<32!(` d�`:��Y _ �_�,�a�� iRx
. _ , ..r � ♦ ��• tt_ wJ T'',�•"� -�_, .�L'. �. ,;,1,•, r L�>i[1'�t;..Z'.vc #.<�t3�•�YJ"iv•ai:':iY Y`
� `.`t1T� < <;.�j,<%`ti =2 ,ii--L : - rt.�i � =sh4:a.i�'/l 4•✓l'..t�"L"T'• •HR �C•�� ..:a� �._'., t-
SIGNED ,'..t•`��a• �•'1�:�.ic'••
t -;{' a t _ ;L .c,rr ��Va < wT .SS. •�UTHO IN U_aq�-.a ti'i+ +�il'o^["��,•y�r. 4+a t
inT a :ft i-s yam"_}L-'1. -2a' •.\ -f` c •�i." .;yam t ^=''`y� ,aa'.2^tt'S�'. :�� 1r .s"`r'.rL `'.
t -4
p« �t< .'�",CL�f F .r-i' a -' ..•, •'i:TOPS
i•,ai...-y..+.�-..1,y�J,•x%��r•t r •.a a•,,�_....r--r:-�=,♦_�-.''-.e^.r g,s:<r++••.`.T r+w.t ii'-�`w_�.��.t�J�a*,w;,v 1.'r-�_ � 'a- -; �,r j�a';. _.._1 1' �'�'
.�` �_�►a, _•'�L•V. IIUM OFFICE SOPPLY.f;;eAt �.fx}-P 3002
J ;(415) 829-1003 L ' .; r"i3�
.�. �..U•� t« l. .,, 4 r ,.•4•'-t,. ' fir ri 'fiGrb�a
.Ra J� ira-.r.:r. a :cif? ti 1 ..1y2.::r4cr E�?4C-�z �a •.w :f
r`" •ii rr{•� < J'r.�,'�...;���1z � ...��i°.F?/ !--f ;^_'Yr i-tr,�c cr'-ii- >r: -.�C y _ * � a
f s r�4`�' •`• '•af:�} i ,rr t' i:��`a` Ate.: �._ < ♦ ,>r -_. w•a -•_i':r"._t",;,:j...,�.',<\='-..,- ,,
�ei.`�"•,^L'":' a. ti ✓�iTt-` a.
:r�:te•i,•:.;�:�^i�r,�,'•i4,:''•''a t-n�tihc�'"''?y.,,;►�Jt+R.._ht`nr-:4=r r?�.-t=�ri ma_ft+,.c."-..',cqa;.-Fi.•.�•=v<�"yfti't',•1r"y Ja•✓ry:�•'?t��a.k��.J}L..'LI�J.L�._...-Y��i.t!:l•r`O\\ff.:;a<'.�i..�.s•'r-r+.C...Z�'C,+a'+`-�`:s�.'T��k:,a.w y a.�r.<i,..�:t i t;r�.•a•.-_�.,:::r•..;�__'c:y 5 a.,ti.(1� .'•''Y�Y.•.7`:.1 f:w
11 i+,_6 L.:'2~�i1`,,�,.��+i...,•�.!:c<i,<.i.>�`i•.�--:,at�,`�`r•.-.�`'.•�;s•,ti"P�t.'.�i'�ce�-:.:��:f:.,a.�%-:.=-'.•:-��'��•:�"-.P:-_r-•.}•L'+.r y�..,.i-'.+r�+_,Y a C��.r,:,�•1^-.•�`. "��,�.J-c 1`f r�_
i�.rt�"•��r•t�.�v wv,i,a_.--�.r''"1,:•..,°'..-..�':_.?•.:�!.',•'`::�==�,"4'.•,-'...3,;_,�::•ts.,1-�
.� ''•+r r
A+% �- :fre•� •7'. 'L•`�<�.T...r s.+ -t. \'�"CY-'Z. �.-ti+L::yYek ��`y .i.-.i .:.w,. ,rZ4 t. w ,..,..�{,•yi TJSe 3) '-,..
'�� S'i•'.;• i±:...,{>'L �d^ '�' yC_' 'f' .i.� f r"�....Y.:a• F••' r �.;�Y...�. r •'^��-3\._,cr ,. t� _
.i`J gaili r.,•;<,i• ��.ii:y"� :•�j�+�r( _ 'iWil�y 1;:T?rA✓r ."'Ga ♦�.�. .)� i a.=.f�N,,.�? Y r -
�. si.A'••/'�t �,,.':,K.a .i.i�(�\a.: tii:+�(ti•�. -�'-r}r;;.: r�saw.,il%".�,iii't+,w'w ,� '� �'j'1rLC,i�:.- 'R.j: � ♦+-
riJ i,i f^�, r a 4. ,ica.�•�J. � Z-� , i °-� `7 +:! r ..n�.t:l . , O�_T.'3i. .? :-..a. L �., �. ,-��. �'
••�,a..,_ Jr r.•Y Lr\-,.+ ''r.M1��r�t..i::••:o v� • 'C r '�? Jam♦ a i-r r t..1�i:a.:-�•L:i.^ T r � �:.r- e�`t'` - y� :n
'��:' .ir..''a c = .1,.�teY.!'i,�.�' r t�,S7t"•:��t?r1 .���•,.i•`•v, T •r t, r
• L r �;y �t a,.., c , w ;rs I '4`i`„{.:'�' r kr. :•�!:h-.,.* 'fa t ...l" 'J..C\
PPh ^
•-..++ IL••�, 1'JJ�`-,,' � j'j.V`ji y'1 �-�t^ Y J, YS r.'' �' l� a�..i J r `-f•Y• `•� .' .c).v�.}- t.. yi M-� . }..
�':�:-.• h 1�� L-v 1�jt�;4��kltf�r,,T .r�iir�'.�ttaY._:!G'• 1 L-• ••'1,i •,L r. a f}+ a a � «,\-�Y+ \. a t ,``..f'":`1•l:.{ � "
\-r xra a.0 tf".«? ',.rhtt-ii��t ,rarrp�t�t�.� . .tr?.Ir .� r, 4ti..;,.c! �.wf •ar,P„ -�'• � '+
\n ;1n4�.`� `L�hr1l+r4{ •.`,}'�`�?.( t' i•�a '�„`i .T}."-,t J .-..':lY,.•.�.,r.,.;�j';�.'-..�:':�f �•, j t y .>1� T^G f f�2:-a•: .-
.1a w ,- L�!• ,�•: �. •�C:C%� '•.,r �k.'r't .er.. a Y;�` '•,, :`�•:=•4:�,••,iJ?`"��;� �^ t- !. �f ..1 '�r i'o .• :S
.M`•� tJti 'k �'tfi••:;o��� i• •,\_ � ti 1.'r'...', `• w -•:'
�'�.�: a t (S zy.a a+,SS'i• dfh}rtyf•� 'l;_.r,. �:7t t.c.,.±`.•- f• >{- �'.:_;..r„_. t a� -a i .,+'l._
•?ti�• .�\t ,.ff`t� Y� ��,,•V. Mrr`.^ ..tip �� .f `t •t• a1, • f .)+• f -i; f '-✓
��+1 I•• ij ;bG� .�q S(t'�7�� a �,,'S1. ):'`�.'e f.1`u. +l•1 7 \ •t"r^ y A J r:�`r.' -+.: ..,, •'•� , "^ y �
�� r?' /".• �.•. ar••- S sa i..••, r:,,tJ 1'a�,2 ^rM , J. L i;•:.. i{✓:..r '•a.
,�♦'y �-rlS�•i' '� J :�S'.�'+•i�� �'!1�r�.1r'n''^. «,C'S.2Y;��.:•ii�c,!Ic�'�.. i i•':r. 7t.Yr, •.,-� �t , �t Y• .a T•., N"' rtl-ti�S•;{; ^ t•v r.r..
�� ">'Y`..1M s^.,�. ci.:t��r..�i• '���y tj Y%'" `fir tk-. ��'^• 'jai..` i•(x•.!3: �F- �\:Y. \�-• Y�,^i•V,:t:� 1. 1- •• Y+. J of
i r �'t Y•�t�� t�r.M1a• {��,u�� � �• V yT'..l• .\ f Y V 7•.<c l•'y2�•�:�F-i.3� •t�r��c'yKr,,.�µ� �'^ tj•.f 1.r r�J.7` � ,��j�~mat+t �`t',•..l:t
\r Y' •� "- < VV �� !!i 1\ f l-S1 ✓r'r.:: 1 I' ,.w il.'� Jvtr 17•,�'�•'I" . :
� r- }'4'r• '�+� ,.t �X, � i''v: %<'�" t•- 7}.:,4 .G:; �' 1' � . Y s w ! .,<„ �,rs�t� ;�a a>_ w
s� '�'y a .;f!ie�' . .L �•' �v�i:t'S e. � ':s�i.� •+:.�:t'�6 i >,. � 4�•. .r,.•W�J''S„L '��•.•.��,�i,i1`ft � vf'l tiu 3' :t L~-rSe,, ' ,; 'i
�Sh"C� y.. rffi L. . _ +A' c, ,,. rt• as ! ? •off u. � ,; t .-?7
���•r•�N.��.1t7 '�`�� ,���� .a ,7• v1t-,ate``"r-{ `t.�J'���a����r.a�.�jyL#'1tZ�,•"��a'P.I'i'�+yif�!_�Y.•T<'t a1�i+C{.k� a i..f �?'c�-`t:T�•r�l4�j'�-:�_ ��.r r "Z-
- : �� r�A. �� � ^�, S. i•., �\�f?rC'iv^f �r4 ,a.���.1�.5: •i �`�i•(..�+;�Cit;"r.r f"� r7� ♦.- yf•` c' y --cx.,Psr:t . 2
3a\'.r!i .Ra✓�t�1 .- _,� C:J :b �.5�. :,`-'�'' '!I �i!1V�_,..ia.�t'..�..,. ,.nK�� \.r! .. !et..� n....A 1•� ,y _ �' �, -
BUILDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
CONTRACT
EVALUATION FORM
1 . Contract Compliance (Has Contractor complied with the conditions set
forth in the Contract Agreement in the following areas?)
a . Plan Review Yes No
b. Building Inspection Yes No
c. Zoning Enforcement Yes No
d. Housing Code Enforcement . Yes No
Comments
2 . Availability (Has Contractor been adequately available to the public,
developers, builders and staff? i.e, adequate office hours )
Yes Most of the time No
Comments
3 . Responsiveness ( Has contractor processed plans, made inspections and
responded to inquiries within a reasonable time? )
Yes Most of the time No
Comments
4 . Cost Effectiveness (Are cost of services managed effectively and kept
within revenue generated by function? )
Yes No
Comments
r � �� 1a
5 . Interdepartmental Coordination (Does Contractor make an effort to work
with other City Departments in the coordination of common projects?)
Yes Most of the time No
Comments
6 . Public Relations (Does contractor 's actions result in complaints
regarding the professionalism or courtesy exercised by contractor?)
Comments
7 . Overall Evaluation Comments
a