HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.2 Transfer Funds Dublin Blvd Traffic Study CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 8, 1988
SUBJECT PA 88-010 Dublin Boulevard Extension, General
Plan Amendment Traffic Study
EXHIBITS ATTACHED 1. February 8, 1988 Agenda Statement
2. TJKM Work Program
RECOMMENDATION 1. Hear Staff Report
2. Authorize a transfer of funds from
Contingent Reserve to finance traffic study
FINANCIAL STATEMENT Study will cost a maximum of $7,000. Any
additional expenditures would need approval of
the Council.
DESCRIPTION
At the February 8, 1988 City Council meeting the Council authorized a General
Plan Study to move the location of Dublin'Boulevard extension about 2,750 feet
north of the alignment shown on the adopted General Plan.
The February 8, 1988 Staff Report indicated that Staff would review the
potential environmental impacts from this project (Attachment 1) . Staff has
identified, through the initial study process, that additional analysis is
needed on potential traffic impacts. Although the traffic impacts from a road
located further north of the adopted location are not significantly different,
it is appropriate to conduct studies at this stage. The supplemental
environmental impact report prepared for the General Plan identified impacts
to traffic and circulation. The analysis included direction that all future
development projects in the extended planning area have project specific
traffic analyses prepared. In addition CEQA requires that environmental
impacts of a project be reviewed at the "earliest feasible time" so that
future actions associated with a project can be reviewed. The environmental
review for the General Plan Amendment would also cover any subsequent
establishment of a right-of-way line and project construction, assuming there
have been no significant changes in circumstances.
Staff requested TJKM, the City Traffic Engineers, to prepare a work program
and budget for a Traffic Study of the Dublin Boulevard Extension between
Southern Pacific right-of-way and Tassajara Road (Attachment 2) . Their
estimate is $7,000 to prepare the study. The study would take approximately
one month to complete. The results of the traffic study will determine
whether significant impacts would occur as part of this project, or what
mitigation measures can be implemented to avoid significant impacts.
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize a transfer of $7,000 of funds
from contingent reserve to finance the traffic study.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO. •• COPIES TO: PA 88-010
CIrL OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: February 8, 1988
SUBJECT: PA 88-010 Dublin Boulevard Extension, General Plan
Amendment Study Authorization
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Map of Dublin General Plan - Extended Planning Area
2) Map of Potential Alignment of Dublin Boulevard
Extension
RECOi21ENDATION: Authorize the General Plan Amendment Study
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Undetermined at this time. Staff will need to review
the project, determine the type of environmental
review needed 'to meet CEQA requirements, secure cost
estimates, and bring the cost information back to the
City Council for authorization.
DESCRIPTION:
After recent discussion with the Staffs of Alameda County and the City
of Pleasanton, and with property owners in the Eastern Extended Planning Area,
the Staff has identified a potential alignment of the Dublin Boulevard
extension that is different than that shown in the Dublin General Plan. In
the existing Dublin General Plan, adopted in February, 1985, the Dublin
Boulevard extension between the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and
Tassajara Road is approximately 1,250 feet north of I-580 (See Map of Dublin
General Plan - Extended Planning Area) . This area is now within the Dublin
City Limits. The realignment of this portion of the Dublin Boulevard
Extension would be further to the north at approxi—mately 2,750 feet north and
parallel to I-580 (see Map of Potential Alignment of Dublin Boulevard
Extension) .
The realignment may provide for a better lard use pattern and better
roadway network in the area. It may avoid being too close to the I-580
interchanges. That situation is part of the traffic problem at both Dublin
Boulevard/Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road. Moving the
alignIlnent away from the I-580 interchanges would provide more stacking space
and more room for lane changes.
The realignment may also meet the federal requirement for either a
frontage road or an arterial parallel to I-580 nortz of the proposed Hacienda
Drive Interchange. If the Dublin Boulevard Extension can be built at the same
time as the proposed Hacienda Drive interchange, Di:blin Boulevard could serve
as the frontage road instead of one that extends from Scarlett Court to
Tassajara Road.
For the portion of the Dublin Boulevard Extension between the Southern
Pacific Right-of-Way and Dougherty Road, the existing Dublin General Plan
policies are adequate and Staff is working on a plan line to implement the
General Plan policies. The alignment of the rest of the Dublin Boulevard
Extension east of Tassajara Road will be considered in the East Dublin General
Plan Amendment Study.
It would be appropriate for the City Council to authori--e the General
Plan Amendment Study to consider a realignment of the Dublin Boulevard
Extension between the Southern Pacific Fight-of-Wad and Tassajara Road.
}
ITFM \0.A, COPIES TO: PA SS--00110
ATTACHEMnENI
PA 88-01b DJsu&.) P,LUD. 6PA
•til<.s.�/'r!,/,f�• iL L1 a,�f/>l:i,iite'�,•'��Ir%a(,;:',,f�''�'i''%,�.J'r;; �t ri'i l'rf'.•✓•fir r�a"%'/...,i^iA•/f'/„/�,«.:„1 f j(', '.Ij/it //-y i,r w'%•�ri:rf;i:yfii,�,f.�' .:„r�/{-i•.,.;��'rs�,•j/,,.'�,r:��:,.';il.,Yr•rLi,r,fr r��.I�J+.':r.�'I%/n''I'f'y,,��nFi�,✓7�jr•r.rs.('�'i/wL i7i�i r/f 41:^,ff'.../r^��//'/!.)r.y'llgia wt'ry.!%�r,i��:IyiGr/L:•:7'..Y1.,1.'r(i,�•i/i�ss j!/4N%,�rwww.�.•...
�..n
.1i
1 rfolel ;�,
:r � ,•''�<.
,
.. .'.' .,y,',l'r': <:.!i y• ''r',i.', r •`�'.%ri- s,/'/`r(,wi� ,,,, ,/.�./�!✓�.L, r•...1 ./. ,'!,•.”
•r.� 'd;i,. •' ,i.;'! is"' „ ''r .ry',. ;::(��rj.�,w 'if/;:Y,'y, /.T.S i'�y//�• •�r.• ''r. +'%^
' :/, ,w •'• •�' . .I,.' , i,... ,la. '%.' '%� 42',�'•' d+/,!.�• �•�wir ,i.,...'r Iii../• a%s r ..
, 'r' .., .4.. ~% •.%./ 'rf::w,}3�i.�i,,•j ;.r' � .r:4,' sue:.:ry,'r. ,�w.y.�,.%�%r',%. :,i. ••�''�.!
. .Carl ,...� .i.! .., r�!�' ,.r:•a:./.'r'i.i/.�i/�r i•,�:f'✓'•r. ,?'t%!'"/!•.;%:,'..�"' ,'%!:.iVd'.�7'T,, .v:� ,. .. .
,.•i .. .. •'r'. `•", w r ,✓r1 .r •`.y•a' e., r,.q ,..ter ..y. ,
'/.•��., .!.« "::fi'�',�::r/ v•. /.t r.>✓w..%jh '/..4r•! 1 •�l/+. { �¢ 'f' ..t �l. rye,• y H' ,r��7j� i.. �y;
e'04/1.i�{��:f'YI'..''%�► 1.Y//%!i � Y�! fr fir. e';";—/�:I'.•'tlr;..r:�!'y�j l;�. ?f� / SrJavl y.r %viY?�} Y!/.,Jt:Y+::ri
r;'/l4 ./ !'• '�'+ 'i%f:.rl .rfs. ^' f �.F1Y �; .r/ rs r'•,''' :+"'" •/,,:%%.
.,. � �11,,�L (i..r./•. .,,. f�.C. / r•.,, / �-..,'�:
is ,.� '/,•/.r� /�i.�i 'i�,!t ,�r b/"/r'R,T;t� '�.I •i ���r< ,f,,•r NS .�•�w..,•�sl.:�• ��F:r•:C.r..4S�It Ir.�":•�i'.:r•,,,,; .
.� .ca'Y«a%�,...^:1�•1 �!'�:{; ,!v. ,T. , 7r1, , r.%•..l..I /yyy,. R;/.w/ r.�..,�,•.� _I
t .•<• .r .7/,w.r' �i, /. ,i�.Rf•4.., )i Zi'. JY�. rG- .lam •!
.% �r ..• ,�...•��. w j, �•.. 1•,. '!' ' :rr-. •. /.y .:%,.r r.�✓ r
�•,:�'Jf I i�f' !iva✓jP yiy� ✓'1% '. {' i.fy y�i' .J. < t:, /Jlrlf'�r• / /!//' r//ti�./✓/- iI:G'JL7;i,:/rwa4f:.i)
}>.. T. .k. i,: ,.yl','+y / ! ✓:'�t s ;, /'' /! 4 f' ,;/r HIV ✓.• y,47;� . 1
r iil 4•:'t' q.v:•.r��'./„"�i•..i+, r r?J.�:,Of�/(.. ,r i 'M'r!� :r�•'f{� /r:•ht!<r, r• -��y/;:':' i'o,r,'...•r�c:rYr, /; �,�• r
.+'rxF• '., �% 'F .'•' y.,.. �.. �ylt ✓:Irr .✓.../, //�TL/s L."l.:o,i;:._ r. f4rL. ly':i:
j• "�l%..vN r:'3,/�-..'.,.'r, r.-•v!! ♦ /T ..i xya• / J `.. ,�• Si�
w s•, r ,.• } y,r,s•%, i 3;L r ,.E741,14 ur., ✓ •r <• rY /-K'•�j1,.:iS..//r, wi1� ':.rw./ r yi,, ..;���
a!a.+ ✓ rl r, r : %•.,, .t•.'.a 1�//�/�L•' s �/ %• /, J••,
f!Y', !:Y i R ;N�•� r x I" L I� ✓ /`r /r. /. 1 1. /1•' .. '�T.;:. .s .i ....I
.cj•trp; / , J. T.l,,,;�t..��y;/'.1•r s/✓ `.�:' �:�^j'.�:,�•: .J ,;F?• .ii= 5�i�:. ;;r•,;
'�/�/ry/1 -r��• �!'S.ay: %` ,y('�/ R/1 r. ,., l{ !(}•.:'!/,.; /.. .,..
7/
j •i.•�� !. r.C,�',l '� r. LO 6r r/ 'fi,�,r�•, i/. ir;' j9 /st /t'J�,/•ir. r ✓ vi•✓"rl,/. '�7�i;i.,
✓i.. r "I� � .,/�J'..''{t?r' f L• � ,,.r.�' {i 7/,e./'I,• � °I.l r.. /1 s�/ �-�. it!'rrr t t�J;•
��'9' ��'/r'�.4/J�r j'S'l.�l�'i.t1 "ih' 13,..!•�. tLn�f�/'I"+/: �.�,i:���;...�, ',1,...,�,/irvr•%�-'1�//'. *r'r raj,-5•.,/,{•-' f!q.u.,�.��4✓.v,"a •..,,,;�
:. 1/fir- O' �!✓ �al+'':l' J l � lf�"� '�yay'rf,•f';,f.y1�f.' P//,(!��e, ,% "'
'✓ fi,/i ' v /'/ C ✓( /rsi' ,!'» s.. J r'.•s."•. / ,,i^•'�' ./ti .t ✓o,i1:' ,,,
/,,,.,./' q / ;d. ',< ..'����';�� rLj.tr �/ � �3rr•i:�s�,. �;w ..
.Y• ��9,,/!:I'�1f�,Y�i r' ::;i i"'" %a<L/���.�•Y•.,�r,:�.N'a J'i:;c^Y,• •..:<!-%ll!,;f:w /7.. j.,•�/. .,, >�JJ >.•�.:'' ..., =�'�r-,+.�,L= '!;'
���7�.G r.+-i•.;,..i/��•4� f;'r•^•KJf'7 ' �°°- :�'i "'" :, � is• yi � � t..: ;OC�/�,Js�,,,;�� ,i:' ,�•`
p.l. .�., � �,l. t✓ •iF^�s+ ie'n±'�/'a i+• t=�:�,1�.. t rL•''.e,/,Y•5� n«�>-, _ _ ;9/,j ;•..�4,•^a,;•;:i• •,
+xi�'''�'h: ''' �fS rrtf,��'f.'re3T,"•/ti,/-�,.w��:ry.�,Ly..iy,�'. �,,.ty'-?j;i'�.vi;.r/: it t/a•-•y%G• �; :,,, i 'f.-
r,w•4Y ✓. •., ,Y �r,'tr� � ,// < t .• r r.,.,. .•':...'.r (, I'-%'✓X' /•� '�� .c. `'..!%'..i;Nt.'l.7n!;,��;' 4
•sri/'!� wt '?L•if.;�ti� /•r r if{!; '�./y 1rSr,1 r1�>.�..v„j�/•�/ �=�j�yy...�..- .r*/� r ,y.r,�?'.- ,i*'. s.. ��,t!r�.�:...,
:� ,!. d'•.. 1J, 7�`,.i•JL./ r.w- 7 / r_ y:!% %i .r•/�, a ;vr PY%• .1 ^
��'.�tav/•+ ,C �.fi , f.. ...mss/..:%� r;•,, /W,i-y=''.{ S!_� ^.:Yl, 1:�.- .y,7 fig •� ^�.::
./1, +r, ,,,.p, {�.',r'.Y ✓.rf i4 ✓'.✓ f�;', i. •.. S. r'•'+/• .�' rI�II!.!*..%�::..Y',',• ""it i rr.
r�!''::rl:/,,'•.:/• tY' •�•%�Yr!-/ ai�Z v� -s rf -f" /w �'�i:�if��i;//✓. ;iy�°�'�✓"sr!�:..iic:r,:�->: ii �... Yy',"'�+• r,:'..,:.':,;/'�i� �i....+:':.
'M' �r�.'t 'X,r':• .ir ,.�. �,.•-sy �� � n ,�1 � f••;.. �fir.Ir'-� r� o/%f,,.�' ;i•:;;4 �l.y � f'. is~ ',.
ryy✓�y�:'✓r >/•.• � .!'/ �+rIT 'r;•I---�� r''' /. .r.,••.",�: .r L:f_/G/li rr �. / ..! ��_:rLa3J:�.�?��Y.C::.i!.i.s:..w:�.��.ii:
:.Gr7 / ,4., :/..1::'..s.-•i'� �- s. 'G..- �;1 �,a"'',�� 1 �L:Y. ..1.c%l�r''^„'lrrt 1yJ ,
n0
ip
L� GUIDING POLICY
Consider/esidendal development
.•.t:.. proposals C=_'uding suppott fau7ties)
0� '`•' on moderate skpeS,with muld•fami7y
denstes W2011 ccnsidered on Barer
^'• •:� land and next m business park areas.
==•Tassaiara Creek; IMPLEMENTATION POLICY
:;,:••Regional Park::� Thefocaaan went and density
•••••••••;;::;• .��: .:� of residential development wi0 be
;•Parks•Reserve;•:•.s•::•::':': : Q determined when municipa lservr'ces
' Forces Training ^:•:.::•:• :•. ¢ can be pr'vided and through General t
} Area ,. ' •ti:.._,a: •:; C Plan refrement swdies.
• .:.
y a O: •:,%%%Santa•Rita:
9 w �• •Rehabilitation Center i
2 3 �y6P W: .•• /
°o
y STONERIDGE 05' 1N t2c�}�tJGE
9� \
Extended Planning Area
Residential/Open Space(s�- note)
Business Park/Industrial:Lcw Coverage
Business Park/Industrial
Public Lands
Blayney-Dyett•Urban and Region
ii. 1,•kAIR - hIltzI.tr.1 PLA-,J
1 •.■. r 1. r
'l, �I �.;�F„ '�Y, �`_� �/' �'/ ./ r�•�` -\=7� ♦may .,�'�� 7
,l'✓�,7':��J�''j%4�ir �f P�•.j'`✓'"'�C'r't✓'.,�, !� ` .�. :"' �� �)//1•' A'Q1, �♦ (j���'�.U7�.��
el
;' ,..�'�;ix,:'''�'.t.��;',��y'jtJ4J. "��!�`�j,;r �r«I.I1�-J�s S d�" �• �I" � ' ` 1'-��./,
r 1,^i� ^•f:�����''1 71►�+3:1f.`;���MrJ/iSw�rF��„-, � �,�' �-• � j •i M y, — •.•\••I^•
GCO b
FEET- c •. Gisd , ;�l I.�-C i//
. !••'/r �•y ,sue =-+j•'"� ”
sy i Wine p
596 R.1 E. 6:r• m I�� �;��I �::
I ■ ♦ �
00 \.� .l ; 000 `� `r_' �/ �, � J'-�;/i��1;�.,,,,/,:1 _ •ii
.. J . r= i t l nT"Jr"-_1 a/// \ �.t //�.��JI) ^J y.� •w ,•1.V-
ooz:
% •�l
? � /� "1 :+•' •.:, , ' � r - `J J `; r �' �/ '� ' iii"-'•/�/l ; �-- :1
, l 1: , �r •:4� ;
•Y 9 765
///' ,• / •' \� •\ I� , /I � !, I I _ �" .B � �/ �,•'ice V f /i����'J �
'., 1�'� `.� is r./� .+r "�� l/�i0�, i _ F.. � 'S, i.v i _ ���'�T• -� �i
:fir .y r-- �� '`� ':� �(- O RA t I: `=,�` :o �• ,
i�; j ✓� ,
� t +
o • a;9 �To _r ti ;� ., �cr.•:• i _ s
J /• ��■ \='ate`'\•- "' CIE ORCE -- .�. � - Ci'�c_�,� `(\_.,J�).�.f •-��y.
'CO)U(USICAIIDX-• r �•; ��_ 'F '/�^�_ % i
•.l' _ �/'�' � aa\-' Y ---rte � ••\-.\ �• �"
\ � �.' •'- � _ � � _� " k'%3--Jim.:;^� - - -�-
:•- .��f: � f�•• ' •I i--
Lj
Hf
:a_ I
,1111 I t'..f- r—, -�l �,••,, cEN '~ q \\, ? aL ��•�wv✓ �T�\� `� \
� 111 - I J Lt~r.. I � �JI �e ..� .- .. �• 's � �`• J I,�• •- `T-• l \-'-~ �- ` '
i ���;• =7 e 1 `�' o- \
-Jill I -I llll,• I III!=1 1111 , -.... _ „_,I `r `•---,`'.'l-_. - , •.:
I.•••\ll ��y''-- p♦C I,i .,.. '�-141���-' za� • i_�.'.,�� ••41
'.1111 1>_I Ilil: Jill i d tt-' „1µI Q' ` `\ ./•'-
Jill .tr VIII i ,,�- b� -.►•�: , 1 E' t�; o \, �'
IF
_I; •rUy '; � •;� D(,(6L(N
� "��. �..• �.. -'•1:' ` — Ex1STtN6 �LI6NtitEhT IT, u; ''1' ,� \
•, '��: I' �'. ,\ _��Dilit�tioll;Ctn 1 C:
II 0, ; N. �__ f•
CT. t - `'' Lal mda.Col
r �tAtt. Al- 60 Mfg'•
NIP or- �
StoN ; ,
' �1G {�' .O,,V. To TAS5AJAKA F-P. � d3�
_5p�}E�FJ f't4 t b i
RECEIVE D
BUDGET BY TASK AND SUBTASK t
r -
JUL t� Relocation of Proposed Dublin Boulevard Extension
HOURS BY TJKM STAFF MEMBER
6-Jul-
Sr. Sr. Asst. Traff. T.E. Tech Graph. Proj.
Total Prin. Engr.
T . Plnr. Engineer Assist. 11 Spvsr, Coord, Sec P �f �
Task Name and Description Dollars $105 $77 $79 $58 $47 $41 $50 $44 $40
Task 1: Finalize Study Assumptions `y t 1
2 2 1
1.1: Land Use $426 1j4x
1.2: Network $347 1 1 2 1
1.3: Study Intersections $347 ] ] 2
L`. Y
Subtotal Task 1 4
Task 2: Set-Up for Analysis L w
2.1: 1990 Land Use Assumptions $674 2 2 3 4
2 2
2.2: 2010 Land Use Assumptions $321 _
" 2.3: Recode Network as Required $381 1 2 4
t
Subtotal Task 2 $1,37
Task 3: Trip Gen./Assignment/Distribut ion
3.1: 1990 $420 4 4 i; r
3.2: 2010 $163 2 1 ;
3.3: No Project
$384 5 2
Subtotal Task 3 420 ' I
'
Task 4: Analysis and Recommendations FV ti
4.1: Roadway Capacity $337 1 4 1
y is j
j 4.2: Roadway Construction Timing $221 1 2 �
r t 4.3: Mitigation Measures $547 3t
4.4:Project Altematives/No Project $337 1 4 t :
Subtotal Task 4 A `
5 Task 5:Report and Meetings z `ss
5.1: Draft Report $1,183 3 4 2 2 6 4 t;
5.2: Final Report $757 2 4 2 ] 2 0
J
5.3: Project Meetings (2) $696 4 4 1 ,
x 4th
Subtotal Task 5 636 t.
A
TOTAL DOLLARS/Ii0UR5 94 18 3 8 50 23 3 8 1 6 h'
S .
ATTACHMtff'"No"