The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.2 Hucks Sign Conditional Use Permit q00- AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 14, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: Appeal of PA 87-122 Hucke Signs Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review, 7016-7150 Village Parkway EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A: Sign Program - Wall Signs Exhibit B: Resolution of Approval Conditional Use Permit for Special Easement 'C-2-B-40 Directory Sign Exhibit C: Resolution of Approval Site Development Review for Sign Program and C-2-B-40 Directory Sign Background Attachments: " Attachment 1: Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-24, Site Development Review Attachment 2: Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-25 Conditional Use Permit Attachment 3: Planning Commission Minutes May 21988 Planning Commission Meeting. Attachment 4: Applicant's Appeal Letter dated received May 12, 1988 Attachment 5: Tenant's Directory Attachment 6: TJKM memo and Figure dated received November 7, 1988 Attachment 7: Applicant's Submittal Letter dated August 9, 1987 Attachment 8: Proposed C-2-B-40 Directory Sign Attachment 9: Applicant's Letter dated received January 20, 1988 Attachment 10: Applicant's Written Statement, Planning Commission Meeting May 2, 1988 Attachment 11: Downtown Specific Plan Excerpts Attachment 12: Location Map Attachment 13: Site Plan Attachment 14: Assessor Parcel Map RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolution relating to PA 87-122 or give lPl U1 Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COPIES TO: Applicant/Owner Representative ITEM NO. c, . ' a. , PA 87-122 -1- FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: PROJECT: Site Development Review for two C-2-B-40 Directory Signs and Sign Program for the Wall Signs at 7016-7150 Village Parkway and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Special Easement Sign. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: Don Hucke 25 Crocker Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 REPRESENTATIVE: J. Ronald Pengilly Pettit & Martin, Attorneys at Law 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111 LOCATION: 7016-7150 Village Parkway ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-210-2-2, 5-3, 5-4 and 5-5 BACKGROUND: In April 1987, as a result of the citywide sign survey conducted in September 1986, the property owner and tenants were notified by the City's Zoning Investigator of all illegal signs identified on the property at 7016-7150 Village Parkway. Illegal signs identified included Wall Signs, Freestanding Signs and illegal A-Frame Signs. The illegal Freestanding and A-Frame Signs were subsequently removed. The property owner subsequently filed an application for 1) a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for two C-2-B-40 Directory Signs/Special Easement Signs and 2) Site Development Review for Sign Program for business identification Wall Signs which exceed the height, length and sign area regulations established by the City's Zoning Ordinance. On May 2, 1988, the Planning Commission approved the Site Development Review for C-2-B-40 Directory Sign and Sign Program and the Conditional Use Permit for special easement sign subject to Conditions of Approval (see Attachment 1 and 2, Planning Commission Resolutions) . On May 12, 1988, the Applicant appealed the Planning Commission's action stating that "The Conditions of Approval are such that under them it is almost impossible to meet the needs of the rear tenants for whom these signs are to benefit. . . " (see Attachment 4, Applicant's Appeal Letter) . Staff met with the Applicant on May 26, 1988 to discuss the Planning Commission Conditions of Approval. Staff indicated Conditions of Approval were worded in such a way as to allow Staff to review and approve the precise location of the Directory Sign on either the southern or northern side of the driveway once plans were submitted. The Applicant indicated he would hire a sign company to draw up plans in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. Staff agreed to postpone schedulipg the appeal for City Council pending the Applicant's re-submittal of glans. Staff met with the sign compan)f representing the Applicant on August 31, 1988 to discuss the Conditions of Approval. The proposed signs did not comply with the Conditions of Appropval as the signs included tenant identification on parcels which the tenants were not located and one sign was located in the public right-of-way. Staff indicated the Applicant must submit plans in compliance with the Conditions of Approval with the exception that the signs may be located at the north side of the driveway subject to review and approval. On September 9, 1988, the Applicant requested Staff to schedule the appeal for the November 14, 1988 City Council Meeting as he would be unavailable for the October Council Meetings. -2- Although the Applicant's appeal letter does not specify which Conditions of Approval would be difficult to comply with, it appears the Applicant has difficulty with Condition #5, 6 and 10 (see Attachment 1, Resolution No. 88- 024) . ANALYSIS: Special Easement C-2-B-40 Directory Signs - Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit. The site layout and development of the property consists of a group of buildings fronting directly on Village Parkway and another group of buildings situated directly behind the front buildings. This layout has caused signage difficulty for tenants located in the rear buildings who wish to increase and enhance business identification from Village Parkway (see Attachment 13: Site Plan) . The C-2-B-40 Directory Sign is the appropriate type of sign to achieve identification for the rear businesses. The Applicant is requesting approval of two single faced C-2-B-40 Directory Signs. The Applicant proposes to locate Sign "B" within the front planter area at 7124-7150 Village Parkway (APN 941-210-2-2) and locate Sign "A" in the planter area in front of Wolds House of Hobbies at 7100 Village Parkway (APN 941-210-5-4) (see Attachment 14: Assessor Parcel Map) . The Applicant proposes to situate the single faced directory signs parallel to the front property line. The proposed maximum sign height is 6 feet with a maximum sign area of 16 sq. ft. (4 ft. x 4 ft.) . The Applicants proposed tenant identification for each directory sign is indicated on Attachment 5. Three of the tenants identified on Sign "B" are located on the adjacent parcel (APN 941-210-5-4) . A Conditional Use Permit (for Special Easement Signs) is required to locate business identification signs on parcels other than the parcel on which the business is located. However, the Special Easement Sign can only be granted for parcels without direct access or frontage on an improved public right-of-way. Additionally, said properties must be interconnected with a traversable non-revocable, non-exclusive recorded access easement. Both parcels have direct access on Village Parkway. Additionally, in reviewing the property profile provided by the Applicant, there does not appear to be a recorded access easement between the two properties. Therefore, H & K Manufacturing, Valley Auto Clinic and Electra Door are not permitted business identification on Sign "B" . These businesses may locate identification signs on Directory Sign "A" . Also, John's Transmission, Amador Ceramics and Dublin Garden would not be allowed on Sign "A" because Sign "A"• is on a different parcel. Signs for these businesses would need to be located on the parcel where the business is located. Staff and the City Attorney's office have spent a significant amount' of time reviewing the Applicant's Special Easement/C-2-B-40 Directory Sign Site Development Review request related to the parcels involved in the application. It appears the parcels indicated on the County Assessor Maps may not be legally subdivided lots, . in particular APN 941-210-5-5. This parcel was recorded in December 1982 after the City had incorporated. The City's Zoning Ordinance defines a lot as "a separate parcel of land shown and identified as such on the records of the County Recorder or on the Final Map of an approved and recorded subdivision. . . " . If APN 941-210-5-5 is a legally subdivided lot, it is the only lot in this application which would qualify for the Special Easement Sign, in that the lot would not have direct access on a publicly improved street. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the Special Easement Sign was contingent upon the Applicant providing verification of a legal subdivision or submit an application for a Tentative Parcel Map in compliance with the California Subdivision Map Act within 90 days and obtain Final Map approval within 6 months, or the Applicant may locate the C-2-B-40 Directory sign on the legally subdivided lots (as permitted through the Site Development Review process) . However, it is noted that a landlocked parcel (regardless of existing easements) does not meet the City's minimum standards for subdivision -3- purposes. To date the Applicant has not provided verification that the lot was legally subdivided in compliance with the California Subdivision Map Act or the City' s Subdivision Ordinance. Condition No. 10 of Resolution No. 88-24 requires that the Applicant modify the southern most driveway to allow for ingress and egress rather than exit only as currently exists, subject to the review and approval of the Planning - Director and Traffic Engineer. As the situation currently exists the southern driveway does not permit vehicles to enter. resulting in vehicles parking on the adjacent property or circling the block in search of parking when the first two driveways are missed. The City' s traffic committee has reviewed the Conditions of Approval and the site and recommends that the southern driveway be modified to accommodate vehicles entering the property as there is insufficient driveway width to accommodate two way traffic. TJKM, the City' s Traffic Consultant, has prepared a memo with recommendations for conversion of the southern driveway to an enter only driveway including recommendations for pavement directional arrows, "DO NOT ENTER" and "STOP" pavement markings (see Attachment 6, TJKM memo and Figure 1) . Staff recommends modification to Condition #10 to require conversion of the southern most driveway from exit only to enter only in compliance with the memo and Figure 1 from TJKM dated received November 7, 1988. Additionally, Staff recommends a 45-day time limit for compliance with this condition. The Applicant' s appeal letter does not note any particular problem with the Sign Program. However, the Site Development Review approval includes the directory signs and the Sign Program. The following is a background on the Sign Program: Sign Program Site Development Review Under a previous Alameda County approval (S-291 approved November 19, 1969) a sign program for the site was established restricting the maximum sign area per business to 40 square feet. The sign program also established a maximum of 60 sq. ft. per group of locator signs for businesses located in the rear buildings. The City wide sign survey conducted by the Zoning Investigator in September 1986 revealed that the majority of business identifiction signs located on the Applicants property were illegal, -in that the signs did not comply with the approved sign program. This was primarily due to the fact that the tenants use of signs painted directly on the building face do not require building permits. The lack of a requirement for a building permit or sign permit makes the monitoring and regulation of wall painted signs difficult from a zoning standpoint. Staff notified the Applicant on September 29, 1987 that the sign program submitted was inadequate, as the proposal did not establish uniform or compatible signage for the development. The Applicant's proposal did not include placement of signs, sign type, letter height, sign length or sign area, items which are standard items contained in sign programs. Follow-up correspondence with the Applicant in November 1987 and January 1988 did not result in the submittal of any additional sign program information by the Applicant. However, the Applicant did subsequently indicate he still wanted to pursue the matter. Staff recommended the Planning Commission deny the Applicant's request for approval "en masse" of the existing wall painted signs and recommended approval of the sign criteria prepared by Staff outlined in Figure 1 (see Exhibit A) . I The Staff prepared sign program promotes uniformity in signage among the tenants by establishing maximum sign area, letter height and length, and by designating location of signage. The sign program does not exceed the maximum dimensions permitted by the Zoning Ordinance through the Site Development Review process. In processing one single Site Development Review for the signs on the site it eliminates the need for each tenant to file a separate Site Development Review application and $105 fee for each individual sign. All signs will require zoning approval prior to placement. The proposed sign program criteria permits larger signs than some of the existing business signs and smaller than others. Those signs which are nonconforming with this Sign Program because they are larger may continue until a new planning application -4- is processed for the individual business. Additionally the sign program establishes a 60 day time period for illegal signs to comply with the new provisions. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the draft Resolution upholding the Planning Commission's action approving PA 87-122 with a revision to Condition #10 requiring conversion of the southern driveway to an "Enter Only" driveway and establish a 45-day time period for compliance with Condition #10. -5- NX W*u3'r;E /�"',Nr" io ! 1: s•�'Tu •eJ �ed4�rw'}��.Hpf, Psx`M � } r 1� 6M h ut ./f n .d, 3 .,i L r t M .ra - s ✓.r ,�. 1k�L '�p r.4 .' . 1 �l�� .,5•aJ��.Yl.�'t i �'�iP1f s,Y; y[ �l4 4, .t N 4 1 :J I ! rV ✓ 1 / Figure. I Sign Program Business (Tenant) Identification Wall Signs*., April 14, 1988 I. INTENT The intent and purpose of%this Sign Program is to establish uniform and compatible signage for business identification of the businesses/tenants located at 7016-7150 Village Parkaay (commonly known as Don Hucke's Buildings) . Uniformity and compatibility of Signage may be achieved through restrictions on sign placement, letter height, sign length and sign area. II. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1) Provisions established in this Sign Program are considered the maximums allowed per business tenant space. Total signage per tenant space shall not exceed the maximums established in this Sign Program. 2) Each business/tenant space is permitted one primary frontage for signage and two secondary frontages for signage, provided the tenant --- frontage is situated adjacent-to a public road-jay or public open space area, such as a private street or driveway, open plaza or square or parking lot located on site. 3) The total sign area permitted per tenant space shall consist of the total sign area permitted for each tenant space primary frontage and - secondary frontage. A tenant's sign area square footage not utilized as -gall signage may be utilized within the appropriate C-2-B-40 Directory freestanding sign, subject to compliance with the established provisions for said directory sign. 4) Method for calculating sign height, sign length and sign area shall be subject to the provisions established in the City's Zoning Ordinance. Additionally, wall signs situated on a background of contrasting color from the tenant's building color or on a board or similar material shall be considered a can sign for the purposes of calculating sign area, sign height and sign length. 5) Specific signage provisions not established within this Sign Program shall be subject to provisions established in the Sign Ordinance. III.PRI` ARY FRONTAGE 1, Maximum sign area: Total sign area per tenant space shall not exceed 10% of the surface area of the individual tenant's building frontage available for signage. 2. Maximum letter height: A. Signs shall not exceed two rows of letters stacked. B. Maximum height 4�f #-aividual stacked letters: 13 inches (1 foot 6 inches) . C. Total sign height for stacked letters: 41 .inches (3 feet 6 inches includes 6 inches separation between rows). D. Maximum letter height single r-ow letters or sign can: 36 inches (3 feet) 3, tlzximtim sign length (width) : Total length of signage per tenant space shall not exceed 603 of individual tenant building frontage length. Lf ,JV 1 . T - _7 IN t"I r11 Lc�n i ' �.�'"' •' .tit ''`a'.iN'%i•,, •if�:p..r:;�......... .,. .:/...l..f ...•....7..t.•,..... ......... .....___.. - -- _. irk �r `y(�11 1:1 4. Copy Restriction: A. Business name, goods or services available at the business, logos, B. Telephone numbers shall be prohibited, except on windows or doors in compliance with Section 8-87,50 1) of the City Zoning Ordinance. -- / C. Addresses shall be located above the door and directional information located on directory sign in compliance with Section 8- 87.50 b) and e) of the City Zoning Ordinance, 5. Location: A. Village Parkway frontage: Centered within the top one fourth (1/4) of building height. B. Rear buildings/rear facing tenant spaces: Centered within the width of the top fascia band. If fascia band does not exist sign shall be centered within the top 5 feet of the building height. IV. SECONDARY FRONTAGE 1. Maximum sign area: Total sign area per tenant space shall not exceed 7.5% of the surface area of the individual tenant's building frontage available for signage. 2. Maximum letter height: see Primary Frontage. 3. Maximum length (width) : 'see Primary Frontage. 4. Copy Restriction: see Primary Frontage. , �-5. Location: A. Driveway frontage: top one fourth (1/4),:_.of building height. B. Rear frontage: top fascia band or top one fourth (1/4) o- building height. IV. APPROVAL Prior to the placement of signs on buildings, signage shall obtain zoning approval in compliance with provisions of this Sign Program. V. COMPLIANCE WITH SIGNN PROGR H 1. All new signage shall ccmply with Sign Program. 2. Existing signs rendered nonconforming as result of approval. of this Sign Program may remain until such time as new signage is requested. 3. Existing illegal signs shall comply with t^e provisions of this Sian Program within 60 days of the effective date o_ this Sign Prog:a_m. i i I i i i 3 ' i i 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPROVING PA 87-122 HUCKE SIGNS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A C-2-B-40 SPECIAL EASEMENT DIRECTORY SIGN AT 7016 - 7150 VILLAGE PAPXTAY WHEREAS, Don Hucke, the property owner and Applicant filed an application for Site Development Review for two C-2-B-40 Directory Signs and Sign Program for Wall Signs and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Special Easement Sign at 7016-7150- Village Parkway; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on April 18, 1988 and May 2, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearings was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the request is categorically exempt in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard iand considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 1988, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 88-024 approving PA 87-122 Site Development Review request for C-2-B-40 Directory Sign and Sign Program for Wall Signs and adopted Resolution No. 88-025 approving PA 88-87-122 Conditional Use Permit for Special Easement Sign; and WHEREAS, the Applicant appealed the Planning Commission action approving PA 87-122 Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the Appeal on November 14, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered all reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT'RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find: a. The use as proposed is required by the public need in that the proposed signs provide business identification for businesses which may not have direct access on a public street. b. The proposed use would be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity, in that the sign will comply with all applicable zoning regulations. C. The use, if permitted under all circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property or improvements in the area, as the sign does comply with and meet the intent of the Sign Ordinance to promote uniformity of signage. d. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clause or performance standards established for the district in which it is to be located, in that the sign complys with the sign regulations and promotes uniformity and orderly development, which is a primary intent of the City's Sign Ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby conditionally approve PA 87-122 Hucke Signs Conditional Use Permit for a Special Easement C-2-B-40 Directory Sign subject to the following Conditions of Approval and Conditions of Approval for the related Site Development Review request: Unless otherwise stated, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the establishment of the use of the property and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1) The Applicant shall provide verification to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, City Engineer and Planning Director that the parcels as shown on - -� the assessor parcel map are legally subdivided parcels or submit an application for Tentative Map in compliance with City Subdivision Regulations within 90 days and receive Final Map approval within 6 months; or process a lot line adjustment within 90 days. 2) The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Conditions of Approal for the related Site Development Review application for the C-2-B-40 Directory Signs- including but not limited to sign location, dimension and sign copy PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1988 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk t -2- RESOLUTION NO. 88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPROVING PA 87-122 HUCKE SIGNS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST FOR A C-2-B-40 SPECIAL EASEMENT DIRECTORY SIGN AND SIGN PROGRAM FOR WALL SIGNS AT 7016 - 7150 VILLAGE PARKWAY WHEREAS, Dod Hucke, the property o,mer and Applicant filed an application for Site Development Review for two C-2-B-40 Directory Signs and Sign Program for Wall Signs and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Special Easement Sign at 7016-7150 Village Parkway; and WHEREAS, the request is categorically exempt in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, notice of Public Hearing was given in accordance with California State Law; and WHEREAS, a Staff analysis was submitted recommending conditional approval of the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning- Commission held'-a public hearing on April 18, !� 1988, and May 2, 1988, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 1988 the Planning Commission approved PA 87-122 Hucke Signs Site Development Review and Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Applicant appealed the Planning Commission action approving PA 87-122 Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the appeal on November 14, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered all reports recommendations and testimony hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find that: A. All provisions of Section 8-95.0 through 8-95.8, Site Development Review, of the Zoning Ordinance are complied with. B. Consistent with Section 8-95.0 this application, as modified by the Conditions of Approval, will promote orderly, attractive and harmonious development, recognize environmental limitations on development; stabilize land values and investments; and promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of signs having qualities which would not meet the specific intent clauses or performance standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and which are not consistent with their environmental setting. C. The approval of the appl?cation as conditioned is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare. D. General site considerations, including site layout, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks, height, public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development. E. General architectural considerations , including the character, scale and quality of the design, building materials and colors, and similar elements have been incorporated into the project in order to insure compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings and uses. F. The project is consistent with the policies in the General Plan and the " Dublin Downtown Specific Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby conditionally approve PA 87-122 Hucke Site Development Review as shown by materials labeled "Exhibit A" on file with the Dublin Planning Department subject to the approval df the related Conditonal Use Permit and to the following Conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless otherwise stated, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits and establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1) Wall Signs on the site shall conform to the sign program prepared by Staff dated April 14, 1988 labeled Exhibit"A" Figure 1 on file with the Dublin Planning Department and shall conform with the Conditions of Approval. 2) The approved sign program shall regulate the letter height, sign -� length, sign area, copy restriction, location, compliance and approval of wall signs. Sign provisions not specifically provided for in the sign program shall be regulated by the City's Sign Ordinance. 3) This approval shall supercede all previously approved sign programs for the site. r -4) This approval is for one C-2-B-40 Directory Sign per legally subdivided parcel. 5) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall not be. located within the public right-of-way. 6) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall provide business identification for businesses located on the parcel on which the sign is located. 7) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall be single faced, situated perpendicular to Village Parkway. The sign copy shall face south bound traffic and may include the address range on the back face of" the sign. 8) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall maintain a minimum sight distance setback from the edge of driveway and public sidewalk intersection subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Planni s Director. 9) Prior to the installation of any C-2-B-40 Directory Sign the applicant shall submit an accurrately drawn and dimensioned site plan depicting the location of the Directory Signs. The Plan shall include dimensioned setback from the public right-of-way and driveway entrances. 10) Prior to the `installation of any C-2-B-40 Directory Sign and within 45 days from the effective date of this approval, the Applicant shall modify the southern most driveway on site to allow "enter only" subject to compliance with the memo and Figure prepared by TJYM dated received November 7, 198S and subject to review and approvallof the Planning Director and City Engineer. 11) The Applicant shall provide each existing and all new tenants with a copy of the approved sign program and Conditions of Approval for the property. 12) The Applicant shall revise the proposed C-2-B-40 directory sign to: A) increase the total sign area to maximize the sign area for tenant identification. Total sign area for the single faced sign shall not exceed 32 square feet; -2- B) to eliminate the word "Directory"; C) the Directory Sign shall include the address range at either the top or bottom of the sign. Panels reserved for tenant identification shall be uniform in size, material, letter color, style and height. 13) The precise location of the C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall be subject - — to review and approval of the Planning Director and City Engineer, upon the Applicant's submittal of an accurately drawn and dimensioned Site Plan indicating the proposed location. 14) The property owner shall increase landscaping within the front setback area subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. 15) Trees and traffic signs located within the public right-of-way shall not be removed without prior written approval of the City Engineer. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1988 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor L ATTEST: City Clerk t -3- yoi::iJ . ,r y u p ✓ k Ai✓t -.:. �»'`v"' rS7.7:4 4� , _p J � �Nl r"-rl�f p. i.:%'f �'r}+' �r " n i- ^ ,w`* d�t49 ra r a�q, ksr 11 rr RESOLUTION NO. 4963mo2dQ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPROVING ,4HUCKE SIGNS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST FOR A C-2-B-40 SPECIAL EASEMENT DIRECTORY SIGN AND SIGN PROGRAM FOR WALL SIGNS AT 7016 - 7150 VILLAGE PARKWAY WHEREAS, Don Hucke, the property owner and Applicant filed an application for Site Development Review for two C-2-B-40 Directory Signs and Sign Program for Wall Signs and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Special Easement Sign at 7016-7150-Village Parkway; and WHEREAS, the request is categorically exempt in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and. WHEREAS, notice of Public Hearing was given in accordance with California State Law; and WHEREAS, a Staff analysis was submitted recommending conditional approval of the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 18, 1988, and May 2, 1988, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony; and NOW,- THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: A. All provisions of Section 8-95.0 through 8-95.8,Site Development Review, of the Zoning Ordinance are complied with. J. B. Consistent with Section 8-95.0 this application, as modified by the Conditions of Approval, will promote orderly, attractive and harmonious development, recognize environmental limitations on development; stabilize land values and investments; and promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of signs having qualities which would not meet the specific intent clauses or performance standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and which are not consistent with their environmental setting. C. The approval of the application 'as conditioned is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare. D. General site considerations, including site layout, vehicular access, circulation and parkin„ setbacks, height, public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development. E. General architectural considerations, includir.g the character, scale and quality of the design, building materials and colors, and similar elements have been incgjporated into the project in order to insure compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings and uses. 1 F. The project is consistent with the policies in the General Plan and the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 87-122 Hucke Site Development Review as shorn by materials labeled "Exhibit A" on file with the Dublin Planning Department subject to the approval of the related Conditonal Use Permit and to the following Conditions: ---a 1 87-122 Hucke Signs Planning Commission Resolution U,. QQ W. C.s_ T%—. •.l ..� 1 ik .f/! flFt� ar;f t�ur�i"�i'�♦"�+� r � � 'lf� ��/S'pin�E��l�ie�`J�.�,j��r�vfi5{'h `„f s iL.��.,��fc5 I�*`��r��r ��M6{ � ri9S"'7 �' f-.rQ� ,if u ,."'`"fib r.J ,yr„E�,�.K,,y? � k y.- � Y> � s'✓"' t :Y" „Y,�r' �T�., y, . ,v .:'�,��st Etrr`s.y 4 sue TMM�'jN,,Ve�r� e P }} "' , h t 1'c t* ✓ P'1tr��/�s .MY�,yt 3e.".".r^ °,,i r :r' , .,rG�R;.IrI 4�ti r/� �_✓ .- J K �4 �-rtH� r - �,j}.. ; .� ` >:. X75 a'T • - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless otherwise stated, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits and establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval;_::_ ; - 1) Wall Signs on the site shall conform to the sign program prepared by Staff dated April 14, 1988 labeled Exhibit"A" Figure 1 on file with the Dublin Planning Department and shall conform with the Conditions of Approval, 2) The approved sign program shall regulate the letter height, sign length, sign area, copy restriction, location, compliance and approval of wall signs. Sign provisions not specifically provided for in the sign program shall be regulated by the City's Sign Ordinance. 3) This approval shall supercede all previously approved sign programs for the site. 4) This approval is for one C-2-B-40 Directory Sign per legally subdivided parcel. 5) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall not be located within the public right-of-way. 6) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall provide business identification for businesses located on the parcel on which the sign is located. 7) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall,be single faced, situated perpendicular to Village Parkway on the south side of the adjacent driveway: The sign copy shall face south bound traffic and may include the address range on the back face -of the sign. .r 8) C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall maintain a minimum sight distance setback from the edge of driveway and public sidewalk intersection subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Planning Director. 9) Prior to the installation of any C-2-B-40 Directory Sign the applicant shall submit an accurrately drawn and dimensioned site plan depicting the location of the Directory Signs. The Plan shall include dimensioned setback from the public right-of-way and driveway entrances. 10) Prior to the installation of any C-2-B-40 Directory Sign the Applicant shall modify the southern most driveway on site to allow ingress and egress subject to a traffic and circulation study to be prepared by the City's Traffic Engineers and subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Traffic Engineer. 11) The Applicant shall provide each existing and all new tenants with a copy of the approved sign program and Conditions of Approval for the property. 12) The Applicant shall revise the proposed C-2-B-40 directory sign to; A) increase the total sign area to maximize the sign area for tenant identification. Total sign area for the single faced sign shall not exceed 32 jquarI feet; B) to eliminate the word "Directory"; C) the Directory Sign shall include the address range at either the top or bottom of khe sign. Panels reserved for tenant identification shall be uniform in size, material, letter color, style and height. 13) The precise location of the C-2-B-40 Directory Signs shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and City Engineer, upon the Applicant's submittal of an accurately drawn and dimensioned Site Plan II. indicating the proposed location. 14) The property owner shall increase landscaping within the front setback area subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. i -2- • P� rj 15) Trees and traffic signs located within the public right-of-wad shall not be removed without prior written approval of the City Engineer, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Ma• Z, 1922, AYES: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Mack NOES: Commissioner Tempel ABSENT: Commissioner Zika P1 ing Commission Chairperson ATTEST: - L 1011 Planning Director i -3- �r+r.:.^ -�• ,•,x '�+i-��l� �id6, % `,)i/i:-. .f ..� ry /n,..L'AL%��`�/,r / 6,• t' ,I:'rj�'z��y,� �' ��,�,�r4 r ./.! ... 1J(JTI�'�i4Jj�i,La••..�r,"y , � �L'�iiJ[},�i�EIr�l�i�� b 1C.:6 ��!m .1�.k�+fLl iw'��~�i�+D�` r�::.si...i.•�: ..:,.• RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO?^!ISSION OF THE CIT'i OF DUBLIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPROVING`A., 2 HUCKE SIGNS CONDITIONAL USE ?MIT REQUEST FOR A C-2-B-40 SPECIAL EASEMENT DIRECTORY SIGN AT 7016 - 7150 VILLAGE PARKWAY WHEREAS, Don Hucke, the property owner and Applicant filed an application for Site Development Review for two C-2-3-40 Directory Signs and Sign Program for Wall Signs and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Special Easement Sign at 7016-7150- Village Parkway; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on April 18, 1983 and May 2, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearings was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the request is categorically exempt in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be,gnditionally-approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard_'2nd considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 1988, the Planning Ccmmission adopted Resolution No. 88-024 approving PA 87-122 Site Development Review request for C-2-B-40 Directory Sign and Sign Program for Wall Signs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT TEE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: a. The use as proposed is required by the public reed in that the proposed signs provide business identification for businesses which may not have direct access on a public street. b. The proposed use would be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity, in that the sign will comply with all applicable zoning regulations. C. The use, if permitted under all circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not,materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to the publik welfare, or injurious to property or �. improvements in the area as the sign does comply with and meet the intent of the Sign Ordinance to promote uniformity of signage. I d. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clause or performance standards established for the district in which-it is to be located, in that the sign complys with the sign regulations and promotes uniformity and orderly development, which is a primary intent of the City's Sign Ordinance. I 1 -,�--a 87-122 Hucke Signs Planning Commission Resolutio o. 8S-25 Conditional N Use r H, BE IT yuRTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 87-122 Hucke Signs Conditional Use Permit for a Special Easement C-2-B-40 Directory Sign subject to the following Conditions of Approval and Conditions of Approval for the related Site Development Review request: Unless otherwise stated, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the establishment of the use of the property and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1) The Applicant shall provide verification to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, City Engineer and Planning Director that the parcels as shown on the assessor parcel map are legally subdivided parcels or submit an application for Tentative Map in compliance with City Subdivision Regulations within 90 days and receive Final Map approval within 6 months, 2) The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Conditions of Approal for the related Site Development Review application for the C-2-B-40 Directory Signs including but not limited to sign location, dimension and sign copy PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this May 2, 1988. AYES: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Kack, Tempel NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Zika la ng Commission Chairperson ATTEST: m c, L Plann-. g Director -2- PUBLIC HEARINGS PA 88-003 Villages at Willow Creek Road, Dougherty Road and Amador Valley Boulevard Sign Program Variance Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Rod Barger stated that the Applicant sent a letter to the Planning Department stating that they were withdrawing their application for a Variance for four subdivision sale/lease/rent signs and that they would comply with the standards of the sign resolutions. There was nothing further to be done on this project. SUBJECT: Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to and Southerly of Dublin Boulevard (Between Amador Plaza Road and Regional Street) Speaker in the audience requested that item 8.2 be changed to item 8.3 because of their attorneys arriving late. Cm. Barnes asked if there were any objections by members .of the Planning Commission. There were none. aon, 7277,M WW SUBJECT: PA 87-122 Hucke Si s Conditional Use Permit and Site fevelopment Review 7016- 7150 Village Parkway Cm. Barnes open the public hearing and called for-the Staff'Report. Ms. O'Halloran stated that the Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Site Development Review (SDR) for signs for the businesses located at 7016-7150 Village Parkway. This application consists of two parts: SDR/CUP for special easement signs and SDR for a sign program for identification wall signs which exceed the ordinance's restrictions. Cl Ms. O'Halloran stated that the Zoning Investigator notified the property owners and tenants of illegal signs, which included wall signs, freestanding, and A-frame signs. The latter two have been removed. The wall signs are pending approval of the sign program. Ms. O'Halloran stated that the site layout has caused signage difficulty for the businesses and tenants located in the rear of the complex. The Applicant wishes to locate one directory sign at 7124-7150 Village Parkway and another directory- in the planter area in front of Wolds House of Hobbies. The Applicant wants a single faced directory sign parallel to the front property line with a maximum sign heip t of 6' and a maximum sign area of 16 square feet. 87-122 Hucke Sim s Regular Meeting Planning Commission Minutes May 2, 1983, Planning Commission Fleeting Ms. O'Halloran stated that in order for the property owner to receive approval of a special easement sign, the property can not have direct access or frontage on a publicly improved street and must be interconnected with a traversable non-revocable, non-exclusive recorded access easement. She further explained that the lots may not be legally subdivided lots in particular APN 941-210-5-5 which was recorded in 1982 after the City had incorporated. She noted -the City had no record of an approved parcel map creating that lot. Ms. O'Halloran stated the draft resolution of approval includes 1) a requirement for verification of a legal subdivision, 2) locating the directory signs perpendicular to the village parkway facing south bound traffic and 3) that the sign area be increased to maximize the sign area for tenant identification. She also stated a condition was included requiring the Applicant to redesignate the southern driveway as an enter only driveway to facilitate parking and circulation for the property. Ms. O'Halloran stated the City has received a number of complaints from tenants on the adjacent property stating customers for the Hucke buildings are parking in their parking spaces not the Hucke property parking lot. Ms. O'Halloran indicated the Applicant was requesting approval of a Sign -- _� Program for all the wall signs as they currently exist. Since that proposal did not establish uniform or compatible signs for the site, Staff prepared a Sign Program Exhibit A which includes restriction on the sign area, location, height and length. Ms. O'Halloran stated that the Staff proposed Sign Program permits larger signs and smaller signs from some of the existing signs on the site. She also indicated that signs which are nonconforming as a result of this program would not have to comply until such time as the tenants request new signs. However, illegal signs must comply within sixty (60) days. Ms. O'Halloran noted Staff recommends approval of the two Draft Resolutions of approval for PA 87-122. Cm. Burnham advised he had concerns and questions regarding the southern driveway. He asked if the one-way driveway could be a two-way driveway. Ms. O'Halloran indicated that because the driveway is only 18 feet wide, it could only be one way. Don Hucke, Applicant, passed out information entitled "Remarks Concerning CUP PA87-122, Hucke Signs prepared for the Planning Commission meeting, May 2, 1988. The Applicant stated that what he believed to be a very simple application was turning into a long drawn out situation which seemed unnecessary. The Applicant stated that all he wanted to do was to put two directory signs up so the tenants in the rear of complex would be able to reach customers. The Applicant described the problems that have arisen since first submitting his application. He described the ownership of the parcels noting the parcels are owned by him, his wife and his daughter. The Applicant stated that there was no subdivision plan ever dfveloped for the parcel transfer which was deeded to Kathryn F. Hucke. Her continued to describe the question of legality of a directory sign on Lot 3. Regular Meeting PCIM-8-80 The Applicant suggested using a sign 4'x5' , parallel to the street. He also recommended the removal of a small tree and the moving of the traffic sign for his sign location. He states that any other location would be impractical and would reduce the number of parking spaces in the complex. Don Hucke stated that he and the tenants prefer sign "A" to be placed on the north side of the big center drive, in front of Wold's Hobbies. He would like this sign to have the same design as the directory at 6591 Sierra Lane. The Applicant indicated he was speaking for all the tenants in opposing the change of the far south driveway from an exit to an entrance only. Don Hucke commented on items 1-15 in the resolution for special easement directory signs. Cm. Burnham asked Mr. Hucke if the north entrance driveway should be one or two-way access. Mr. Hucke indicated that this was not his driveway since it was not on his property. -y --` Ken Begun, 2284 Lakewood Place, Martinez, CA 94553, stated parking has been a problem for the adjacent property as customers parking at Box World use his parking spaces. Mr. Begun suggested that an enter/exit driveway should solve the parking problem. Jack Keets, 4689 Jefferson Court Place, Pleasanton, CA 94566, indicated he was apposed to the -driveway change and stated that sign painting and building painting was expensive and requested the Commission consider this in their action. Kathy Lee, 1893 Spruce, Dublin, CA 94568, owner of Amador Ceramics, commented on her business not doing well and stated that the directory signs are needed to help direct customers to her. The Applicant pointed out that the sales revenue for the tenants on this site is 5 to 7 million dollars a year and this contributes to City taxes significantly. Cm. Barnes asks, if there were any more comments. There being none the Public Hearing was closed. Cm. Tempel suggested having lettering on both sides of the directory signs. Ms. O'Halloran commented that if lettering is on both sides, the letter size would be reduced. One single sided sign would provide larger lettering and tenant identification. The Planning Commission discussed the merits of a single faced sign as opposed to a double faced sign. Cm. Tempel noted a double faced,sign was appropriate. C. Burnham commented that address size are critical and may interfere with the sign area. Regular Meeting PCM-8-81 May�2988; , r, !'g,//� �a IJ'•�' �:/ '� I' �`'{'�r'*��y��i�} � r� f f.� y,•. i'w .fa�,7f w T � » �h+�1� ' / ' v � a' ,d d ,,�✓rrlr�L r. .L �.w,r7"�' �,. '�I- ,� a'• ��iN:tiy`v.yvr�,F�.�, � 1�':lt.�:tafrt•/Il�?:�:�•"I+�-�! 1• 3� '� �r !I SJ.<..a��r_"��,..F;��:i,.��r.�.:S:,J�, >3/'. „ ,. .a.:,:J�f:� �' a.,�.�f.:.�.'s. .. Ms, O'Halloran stated address numbers are not counted within the required sign area. The Planning Commission -discussed the issue of the south driveway with the concensus being that issue of exit and entrance should be reviewed. Ms. O'Halloran stated the police department has reviewed the southern driveway proposal and does not have a problem with Staff's recommendation. Cm. Burnham saw no problem with all driveways being exit/entrance; however, he asked if there were any legal problems with that. Ms. O'Halloran suggested that Condition #10 of the Resolution could be modified to have an ingress/egress subject to review and approval of the } Traffic Engineer and Planning Director. s Cm. Burnham asked if Staff has comments on Hucke's request and/or documents. Ms. O'Halloran noted that a parcel map must be processed to subdivide parcels =: :_— and that the Applicant must verify the subdivision was legally created. Cm. Burnham asked if the tenants and property owner have been sent letters concerning illegal and nonconforming signs. i - Ms. O'Halloran indicated the letters were sent out, however, enforcement of illegal wall signs has been postponed pending action on the Sign Program. She nat.ed that the Staff proposed Sign Program allowed the wall .signs to exceed the height and length restrictions and allows the sign area to be increased to the maximum permitted under the Site Development Reft-ew process (10% of primary frontage and 7.5% of secondary frontage). Cm. Burnham asked if each tenant has own marked parking spaces. Ms. O'Halloran stated that the Site Plan approved by the county did not designate parking to specific tenants. She noted required parking is based upon the use of the building and designating parking is up to the property owner. On motion by Cm. Mack, seconded by Cm. Burnham, and by a vote of 4-0 (Cm. Zika was absent) the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION NO. 88-025 APPROVING PA 87-122 HUCKE SIGNS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A C-2-B-40 SPECIAL EASEMENT DIRECTORY SIGN AT 7016 - 7150 VILLAGE PARKWAY Cm. Burnham commented on -whether the issue of single faced directory signs versus double-faced directory signs should be left to the Applicant and Staff to work out. / i . Regular Meeting PCM-8-82 t _ ggg • ,J i �: �ti 'r+:t,;.��:n�,�,�`,Z�,�; .� Rc\.� �iT � w�a`� s. \ \C\ �\ c ry � r�C. e Y e•' `3, �_ \.� � \ <<\ •� .�� ': . 'r, � h � 1 f)•..\, � �'�\ a�ti; \�``� `,K._:';'31.. � ``, `` '��",l;\� ��- ��:. ,4Y�:"e�•`"�,.'Qn.�£i)i�.t K°\ >\ � i• 1 ,� '� �•.'�.\ `.i�.\t�ti'`+J.�_.,......�'1 .�. 2,� I..<.',1!�1� .,.. n,t � ,�_. . ,.k, r,�a. .. ... .a...�."� 2v-_ P-t'�''.�� w'C\L. .:L w., \ ;`..:'•. ._+._�e7�.,.1_.-,. ,:a: �•, � / �- �'! ,i.,. {/ !' � y fit£ �' yL"''° �° `-•F� � �' lire � � ,.�+ ..� r✓ s, 4 f p r �7 tt � t }.`r, Ytr✓ `t. t�' s•�O,Jyj,�f', ,tl �Hk sr6n, • •r .� q T.��r 1... p,-w ! f'�t4. •'� drr1Y�"�l i��s f .+..A .�u'�.e�i�:.cx'wJ.�l•u...i+�i�.r rc.L�L�=.�,V..+.^.�'>t.,7�,ei.:rly .�!...�i�::�c�P•"�� ti , i+;c� ��r.;s:�t:.�:� �J Ms. O'Halloran noted that it is Staff's position that directory signs for properties located on major arterial streets such as Village Parkway or Dublin Boulevard should be single faced signs situated perpendicular to the street. She further stated that if the Commission did not want to restrict the signage in that matter the Condition should be modified, Ms. O'Halloran stated that the sign area, height and location are .all items which should be considered when taking action on a Site Development Review application for freestanding Directory Signs. Cm. Tempel stated he did not see the difference between single-faced and double faced signs. Cm. Tempel sees no- problem with the Applicant's sign request. Cm. Barnes indicated that she would like perpendicular sign and that she was in opposition to. a single face 4'x8' sign. On motion by Cm. Burnham, seconded-by Cm. Mack and-by a vote of 3-1 (Cm. Tempel opposed and Cm. Zika was absent) a Resolution, with an amendment to Condition #10, The Plannign Commission adopted RESOLUTION NO. 88-024 APPROVING- PA 87-122 HUCKE SIGNS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST FOR A C-2-B-40 SPECIAL EASEMENT *DIRECTORY SIGN AND SIGN PROGRAM FOR WALL SIGNS AT 7016-7150 VILLAGE PARKWAY The Planning Commision took a short break. A- SUBJECT: Proposed Plan Line - New Road"Yarallel to and Southerly of Dublin B Ulevard (Between Amador Plaza Road and Re ional Street) . Mr. Barger provided background comments on the propose, plan line for the parallel road. He�taentioned that at The Planning ommission meeting of 4/4/88 a request was made by th Commission to provides o additional alignment AV alternatives. Trudi Ryan presented the Staff Repo or is project. Ms. Ryan made reference to all three a"t " a 'ves and comments on Alternative 1 which was discussed at the 4/4/88 meeting. S}l rreviewed impacts and mitigation to 191 parking spaces b ' g removed ands duced vehicle maneuvering area. The cost of Alternative # s estimated at $3 ion. . Ms. Ryan described Alternative. 42 with an estimated $6.7 MY i.,,p cost. She commented on the Caltrans -p. 03ected need for additional right of�i She described ACFCD requirements for building over a channel and subseque maintenance responsibilities. She indicated that fewer parking spaces , be available if Alterzlative I wasrused but there would be no opportunity far on-site mitigationjShe commented that the Willow Tree Restaurant and Howar)i,, Johnson's would be affected by-'the loss of existing parking spaces and landscaping. The Alternative 2! alignment would be inconsistent with the Downtown Specific Plan. Regular Meeting PCM-8-83 i 988 4. a s Z ` \r '�.> ::;. „� �x ��r f �, i;t��1�. i �s�t��•y,y s»trt.;-,l`p.l�e\{:ir��\ i - l .. ♦ � t ♦. \t \ty41 ♦. .�t\ `r �.. .��t c]. "iy��:�'♦":Ct\.',\ '` lZf fir,;• 4a. �.�.�>, _ i't rl-t`\ it i� .. ', `, t ].�.. �4.a tty t tx �.�ttiii'a'.,v.t,`�..]r>^Si i °tt(�:`t�,i�!y��#Z h ]��?i.t�Lr"'.;�} 1�..1,a1�rti� •i-ti 1.`.t �,�� . h k�, 2i\l':�:�I;• t, .,� ay.;;}.�: .;ti.. �l.a .♦.°.r�!_ .,Ait�,.W�M.t'i• +1�,.. t. , lt, t�v��t.,t�.:ja + e.1i;x, t a+\�.`\` 1 .` , C 7, `' <.,¢��•'•' „� ��•; ♦:Z,::nl. �'�� a- \+t\11 ;ir.�, ;•;�..t:.ZC�,c�.:,♦�\�.`�a'��,i'?.;�'4�',ylas��i2....•+��y`-.�\�1 �`.=.t.' '.c,av�s �t `]e `• t ;�. �.:f" '�v�: `�\ ` �e, :`ter� <`1t ,,to .'a\�4. '�`„��lV�.a1�; �� ` � ��`i�;,�',�1.t�t. �`1ie�,�4a"^♦,..i.��}.5`�i��.r..*i: ��.,..,1 at t\tt,s� t� \..i:♦'c��:.:'...M1♦:.tin�.l';A..,�;`�•1;,:..t\y��,.U?.`'i..`.\:';\t.'C,.��.:\�\hi��b'r;.'i��.`3�\�,��i��"? ?�:��1k\1Ct'i+.3v��::tc.�nh,°.�'.:�'�'1\�l':1�i:`r`�z\. ":.�\t.n.:c~it';Ta....., :1 _.. �.:... . .. , A r DON HUCKE -' 25 Crocker Ave. , Piedmont, CA. , 94611 - (415 ) 547 5066 May 12, 1988 Laurence L. Tong Planning Director City of Dublin Dublin, CA 94568 I am herewith appealing the letter dated May 4 , 1988 regarding the Planning Application PA 87-122 Hucke for Conditional Use Permit for Directory Signs on my , Mrs. Hucke 's and Mrs. Sutton's property at 7016-7150 Village Parkway . _ The Conditions of Approval are such that- under them it is almost - impossible to meet the needs of the rear tenants for whom these signs are to benefit and I firmly believe that the matter should be considered by the Dublin City Council. Do , Huc io R .ECEI .Y. ED. MAY 12 1988 DUBLIN PLANNING j� f �1 87-1?? Hucke Signs Applicant's Appeal Letter dated received Hati 1 2, 19; ,._ ..... ...5i•.«.�r'::ayil;.h."�1:rain:>.77r:,t5•.E%-'.:rs:r.L' w:e'A6*b:ka+::�.�.:.•:,.,/:r�:::�w:rrc�i..'r:r:srxrr:+o.uarrraaauKr;,r.;�„rr�r:a<v°-w 7::,r:ir:f:.:x,,w;e�.vv.+::u:.aaw�nr_x»owsrn,v.. DON HUC KE 25 Crocker Ave. , Eiedmont, CA. , 94611 - (415) 547 5066 k�kkJ:�cickkkkkkkkkkrkkkk lckhJckkk�;kkkkk�+c*_ k�:Jc�c�cic��c�ck�cic*kJs�*lcis�C*kkJc�C� January 15, 1928 add--da to Sign Develozment Review PA 87-122 Hucke TENANTS GN DIR�CTGRY r, ' X7016 John's Transmission x 7042-" X7050 Dublin nGarden1mcLipmea` _ 7080 Car Wash 7104 Dublin Tire co. 7106 d'Gld Sho✓De TENANTS ON DIRECTORY 7f-0.2A Valley Auto Clinic _ 7112 H & K M_n4_`_ct-uri Cc- 7.14y Elec`ra-Dor o= 1.ub 7130 Parkway Bc'd, Shop 7133 Aut•omov;_ve ConsuIta« •- 7140 Broadway Mu=fler Directory s4 C c v,- be E - a5 �: led on E��r&ti- drawing. Due to smaller numb_r'o `-..ants on e_c`: di_ectcry :rc• origin&_ 1 l be S" wide- rather tihcn :,isZ E" c% Dlau=, D&IIt�-- will .ane-I `vo be c::&%ti-a t�n 12" wide Icr 'Zet"; I—_�: . nca Hucke t t _ 87-122 Hucke Silon: t] .F1•� "�'�va : .•Y i Tennnt'c M rArtnrx 1 `» tY r - 1 �,,"�i rd7C.,`6F lrt.W a h { J ✓v�fl.: �r � ,4.6.0' a o ' ,e�1 .1b•.� ,��•y FT I��ifj�rr,,(�'�� ,y ! 7 .r-!A w� a�y�f G f ! 4`73�.s p. �/� �j me r�.t, lyus,Yf�L4+; �a :{1� �H�+�r'�.��f"�.C.�L{t�t1:1' �!•i��a1L ,/ Yr ! �J'sfa �_�d y��✓ f ': 3• �Ji �9 y.i��ej C'i;�ti;'.�f!/i•°V . �� ,�'�,[�j 77�� .pr, .,t;�r s�.(,)r``�i!Yi�t�r�" rY ! yt rv�}�,. t,! yf�r N� c Ja?t'�f} a �' ,1�j !• t f� r�.F�'�i.ls �Jy }�.S ! �l G� Y y :1!N"' 1 A f'• J' f ,lam S� �� .1 9. Y 1? ��•� ter. ,,f /'f }'��) T 9i llr r"�! �j'Af - J�,/'7 w� r 7 "tx.z �i� •Aiq/.;a r�a� il,�r, N�.yi„'. .Fr•.,5f �!' / ffY. 4++.'.J,.cp� v yY' 1uu'�tt: t�Y .1P.i r) h � r r ,' s t *� "� �,L:t.s„ 'rL"7`m; f/P'n"s'•• e a! �h�: .� r"�.N,�.w-" fk, * !. y ,o/, V ✓' f tr Y,'r f .,+!. y,', ! 3 � 4:, p.� �y3Y �,�'. ♦ �. Rf. r ., r�r�jf'u,. f �'^�L,�l fd+/4y w ty-,"�'„�L ��J�A'�' -v��x,r�'9iV,,}��1�nfk��* i�s,'�,°,`,.p�r�tdytX rif6 i�i i 1�jr+�� ,44rf�•• ir. � 'ra�'iir�•ld' y;� ��,��J� �f�.. Y. l tJfRS.sLfh1'Pr..i,ItR.li<+L.X..'sJ MEMORANDUM . f DATE: November 7, 1988 TO: Maureen O'Halloran i FROM Michelle DeRobertis SUBJECT: 7016-7150 Village Parkway Southern Exit Only Driveway _ This memo presents our recommendations for modifying the direction of the -' southernmost driveway serving the Hucke property located at 7016-7150 Village E fParkway. i The southernmost driveway would serve the property better and .would have less impact on the neighboring property if it could accommodate only entering vehicles. Southbound drivers on Village Parkway who are uncertain of a business' location on-the Hucke Property would still have an opportunity to turn into the site at the southernmost driveway if they missed the two previous driveways. However, there is insufficient width for this existing driveway to accommodate both entering and exiting vehicles. Therefore, it is recommended that this driveway be converted from an exit-only driveway to an entrance only driveway. This change will also help to better utilize the existing on-site parking at the front of 7022 Village Parkway. Along with the conversion from an exit only to an entrance only driveway, some on-site signing and pavement legends are recommended to reduce any potential confusion stemming from the change in the driveway's direction. The additional pavement markings are primarily directional arrows as well as a "STOP" legend for southbound on-site traffic. This "STOP" sign is to prevent broadside collisions between vehicle entering the site via the driveway and on-site vehicles travelling southbound in the aisle. In addition, two pavement legends direct on-site vehicles away from the driveway in question to the remaining two exits. A "DO NOT ENTER"legend is recommended to inform on-site vehicles that the drivewav is one-way only. These additional recommendations are depicted on the attached Figure 1. RECEIVED liO ; J I :+i rur-tti�aa+ rhm 157-001 Attachment t-77-n t 7"1\ T1 ,T a :� 87-122 Hucke Signs 4637 Chabot Drive,; [! TJ0 memo and PLE Y I 0 ,±:i .,� t., Figure dated received 11/7/85 a� A^tt : as il� \,� ; l ♦r i l\�` �lt o ,u+7 -`c � � .n L ,t` 1 t r ., \1. - r ..< • �It\ 1, to r '1 ,t. � v\ .� L �. ,♦ t .. \ � a 1.. - `t ":'�•. �`\`� n..\�1,,,Yf`\:d.W�ph4;�\ <.��`1 ,�.� ti t �a�)\ �: S i�" r .�:` t/ C �1..a�t-z eY qa p1. .� �V� `• ♦ t•�,, �{:',.'.)>� t.l ;. � t ., � � < }�� 1 wt c t. t n l. h „� L. \, t 1 S�,y� i•r� v •it< ��t.\� �C::�.:�•'�t�t., ,dpi 1 �" a d ,`l 1� �.\a1.l�a 9! a� y� `@a>:. 1a:<. p�. �Y\ 51: �ft�i'.lh. 1Qr. 1-�`; Z.`\ l•`1i`y�triM1ly �.ti\1`t t)t a» .:u1`Z�� ,0``1`. ,.�\., rA. .,1 ;'��,. ��'�, "S tY1`.i';tlt l\^4l, � �:.'l+�• '�a:}`1,11'•c.�i RCS�j�`,'� ;`��,'a��i:11.'y}a+�• `�� t�,.,1.��+� �y��'"14A.� �?��'•;.:c:,4�'4;`}1,a'lt�.1'1t � t � p� .TG ` .i,�a a.♦�.ta4� .;t,�Fla�'rt�,ra� 1'o a�.4�:.'l��a;��h?i �4 yFS�\w�tf,t 1i a,5.t��,�11,. �2� .!4,.•L�,.Qe�iit�'��xf�� .•.n...,..•.a+..11.•:.,a�1...,.nt),..,<a u�u.�,..1•.:..i1,,.....,h..,..,..:.. ...�ic�":�f?,�n�, ta�,,�.-2.exl;�..i V..\e...,.i-;i... .•:n�.,..,."c....,..1,V.�..dcKt.i`....1y�.•u,. t..� . ., _ �, __. ..... ......__. ."... ...._....�_... ..r............. .. .......... r ... ... ... ... ..w.a,.. .. •..�.l.lcf. .n«......r. � ..[/..n..._a....�.1. .llYO12,1:1ilMLwl• _ Y.t(6:1:\u�l..L.11r:w�1n.L.l.M..:'�HWi�� we)l - _ .�f—r� 1 RAJ�3 C.S, \w\` \ • \ { ,� .; f�� 1 \ it EXIT Cn rrJS'f Iy� � 0 Jtife �w. t—O VA IAN 00 NXIMEME \\ k c t T PARNI110 SPACES - I VILLAGE PARKWAY FIGURE:: CITY OF Recommendations for the Parking Lot W; ' . .. ' DUBLIN of 7016 7150 So. Village Parkway � s 157.040.11.'W I . ;^ • - ;�•`• '87 - 122 IDON HUCKE 25 Crocker Ave . , Piedmont, CA. , 94611 - (415) 547 5066 August 9, 1937 RECEIVED. Planning Department 6500 Dublin Elvd . Suite D P 1 Dublin CA 94568 '- . PLANNING. Sign Development F9M4 Don Hucke --� - 7016-7150 Villace Parkway . The enclosed application for a Sign De•;elcpment P.eview is for the purpose of obtaining a permit for two free-standing Directory signs, described en the enclosed drawinc. These Directory signs will serve -two ;gain purposes: -D1=__laJ postoff ics addresses and names Of tenants in the rear portion of the _hopping complex who nC9l h jL�.° no suitable leans of directing customers to their place of hus ness. 2 . Get Yid of-7 a mish-mash of locater signs that various tenants have tacked on to the side and ends cf ti:e front builcings. A nOtice will also be sent to tenants tc. discontinue tiIIile the use of so called sandwich lions in front of their stores. All of this will , of course , improve the appearance of. the buildings and: h'orefu-ly improve bushes= fcr tho=e tenants in the rear :'o=t cn Of the c0 ilex . At this Sam= t;-? I re=.ect:ullV reC: c.t ,fie riannln Department: lh-�r g 1 Y. the tainted slcus c: all C the b�.?ildi c a_. vo ou h- , -view s a-,pYCVe tiler e_^. IDa=.2 in 1" v Of the Sec. 6-37 . 33 limits the area of businaSS Sion= t0 42 sz.f V. but can be increased In a Sign Development Review as can t'ile heicht 0= the letters and --'ength . r 'he sign Cfrantled vO the Buck I assume that the Sseci_ cs. ions fo ..i1 _ _ -'ter their building at 7075 Village F_r � Y St'.,�' company f.. .. �:.-: are consistent with the Dubli:i General Flan and certainly rive li,.itS 11 that apply tc similar,,hu_ nes_es and b; ildings in the same area. Usinc those sic-. limitsion all of the ct.her businesses in the comple;: would, I am sure, place them all in the permitted class and allow a General rulinc to let them stsn'd as is. I will see to it. that future new Tenant= c;ho desire tic chanze t'he sign language are not-if ied to check with the Flannir.g Department obtain any nec,_ssary permits,- etc. K-122 flucke Sins r1h r%! Applicant's Letter dated `7 received August 9, 1957 All of these buildings except Building too. E on Lot 2 were originally designed for light industrial ::,ack in t := 1550's. Thus they all had big truck high roll steel doers 12' x 14 ' . The rear buildings still have these doors while the front buildings have been filled in ,,ith glass but still retair. .the 14 ft. high over_incs . This just naturally puts the s cas on all cf the buildings hic`,er than the 14 ft. limit. Comments on each of the business sign=_ i n question are as follows: -� 7015 V. P. John 's Transmis-gion This seems to meet the present ordinance =.:cent for h_icht of the letters . I did not climb up to measure '.ham but as a cuess I believe they are certainly less than 24 in-ches . hich. The present locater sign or signs will be removed. 7022 V ;• Eo:: itiorld e�ea of sign s°_°_-T,s to melt limits sat on Fuck Sto'+°_ wilding . This _ntvirely new t of business in Dubl_- _n _�35 and was a n � r� , tenant had tc get his me=sage across service was available for Dublin citizens. With UFO service for shipping in Dublin it has proven to he a definite Succe_s . Fe intends, I believe, to make a francni=_= c:Ein out c= tai beginning Te deny the moderate advert-=_ :g he now hz= would be a hardship to a na:a and fresh business. 7020 V . P. ?•!'cCurlev ' s Floor Covering This business ha= ju=t been sold and I do not knew :r„at the new Owner plans n=ee and signs. I am,, n^tiSying hi_ _n- w ivinc t,h-z'/ he musk, contact the Planning De^a,c•msnt if he J:a_ any idea c= changing the Signs . 7030 V . P. `l,.ti+in Trophy Fl-use :h 15 tenant i_ c sub-125=c2 C= Alan \i.._c . of vile From my inspection. of the sicn it seems to be a qu_=-tion cf measurement, - the entire surface area C= the area c-- G,:2 leGt2_"S only . At an-r Ya.2 it is certainly with_- present ' :=ts cf SDR and I ie:,uest. that I \ be ailcwec \•o remain. -7023 V . P. , The Frame Co lhi- sign l`=en here, since la! 7 any cc_•Gainl: C:W2s under" the limit ofnthe~707 V.P' building. I knc:c that all wcrk. o the inside of tie st•orz in 1577 was done under a permit - whether or c n�\• that included the sicz I do not kne::. At any rate it certainly is not above present. limits. 7042 V . P . , lrlador Ceramics - I didn ' t• qet' up to measusre the height of the let•t•=rs but my guess is that then are not over 15 inches high which is .certainly not out of line . Their locst•e_• signs will be removed. 7054 V . D'=_ Needle Arts and Craft I believe that the letter height and width and the area are within the limits set on Buck Stove . The awning, I 'm told, was put up by an outside company who were supposed t:, get any necessarey perM; ts. )4r . Day , the o.jner, is quit= willing to apply for and obtain a post facto permit if you desire one . 7050 V P , Duh.i in Garden. Supply Here again , I believe , the sign should be satisfactory under the limits allowed to 7076 V.P. Because of th.e fire doors required by the County at the rear of the rear buildi:gs and because of the Flood Control ditch easement of 12 ft. back there, a platform in the back of each building is a safety necessity and they were built right a_'t.r the buildings were fin ished in the early 1970'x. The new manage- of this store has agr to build a ne•:7 fence around it to __:•rove the appearance fr-:= t;,e car was` side. None of th__.= pl =f=orm=. are visible frog, the freeway - I checked t�iat out pets onally ., _ 10F6 V . P . lei inc Shoes I believe that, thiE S; 9-' is within all spec_ as approved under a previous SDR. 7078 V . F . , ?_uck Stove Co Approved previously 7080 V. F . , Car "Esh No signs at pre_ent - will have space on Directory I diCn' t' get _: and, measure the lettz: hzicht but it certainly =- less than 21 inches. Cther:ai=_e it shout_ OK 7102k V . P . , Vallev_ Auto All loco-er sip:= will be removed when n_rect•.ry =_ic n: are up. I believe all other spec= are OK the _ control Sic: 15 a St-atee sicn 'an - t be counted ) 7102 V . P. K=r.c Fu her?„e Approved pray:iously . 7104 V F . Tir-6 , Sign is, I believe , Q; .� L'ocater signs wil' be removed . 7106 V . F . , Dcld ' s Workshop Locat;er %.,ill be removed. Approved previ c'.,=-1}• .- 1� y' P , H . C K Machine Shop No signs 7114 V . P . , Video Central Seems to be OK - note on widlth not explained and not apparent. 7114:1. V. P . , Electra-Dor signs seem to be OK , certainly within Euck Stove limits. Locater sign .rr l i be removed 7130 V . f'. Perkwav EJo(iv 51,01) I believe this is easily within Buck Stove SDR limits but some art (? ) designs can he removed if absolutely required. - - 7136 V. P. Aut_'mot•ive Consultants Letter size ice cue=_t.ion.able - I did not climb up to measure 1t. I 'd guess it less than 24 inches easily .rithouot the painted background . I 'll get him to change it if you insist but it =_e=ms quite harmless back there. St:ecker's Lounce is business has been sold and the -a er will take over as soon as the li:ucr lice=se is transfers==.Jft— hop=full;• Sept. 1st. He will be tc•ld to get a sign permit fr'cm y^u. 7140 V. P . 1i:-f. `Cr Locater sign W:_ be removed . The can sign on th; e n.Drth side of the building is,- believe , legal accerdizg to the definition of Secondary Frc' t_g- . The sign overlooks az open plaza -and/or an auto parking area . The advertising value is unmistakably good . NOTE The property _uest;on is owned by Dcn c:ucks Kathryn . . Hucke (my wi:_ ) =hylli Hucke Sutton (my ca•-l'ghter) I have their permission - year their plea= - tc repre_ent th?m is an necessary legal way in this matte:. Submitted by - Dcn Hucke 25 Crocker Ave. Piedmcnt, CA. =�:_1 547-5061a A Pan Hucke RECEIVED DUBLIN PLANNING 1 r 1 (J ; � r la _ o ^? . . . . � _ J 1 c7 u in I� ;r _ ., Chi i V 3r 2\j to -r �}� Rex ZI, �- � :S i i9Jurr!inHm or /3 r o n z e c� r co z C- i ; l f eel ', e ' lip _—_.-------' � H las a Yn e 0 19 A to 03 s S c� I\ . f,-)Z-4 l v ' � Q'i,ct. 'rue Ut��l NUCKE '87 ' 12 2 �.. M�ft stow 0�, L�IJ HUGKE 25 Crocker F.ve. , Piedrlo `J, CA. , 94E11 - (415 ) 547 5055 kkkkl;kkkhkkkkkh•/:/;kk/ckkJcrkkf:kkkkkkkk�ckkkiskk�Ctkk/ckkkkkickk�;kk*kkkk - �a«ua-'y 15, 19212 Fiamning Department R G C C C I V E D E50G Dublin Elvd. G r. J Dublin, CA. c «❑ Att. Ms Maure•=• r`1'a _� ., �►'-'�:v DJ�W:v rte,,..•.. The enclosed tit1= re_ sr l_ a-:A ten new ?.r'=_ prints of t L+rczertJ with aCcompa. '71' C evLE.S, 'vll i i , 1 C=rtalril1 feGL'=/ you Vc. Uroc==s cur r.0 ==t_= r perms . i Gr two directory sl7«a SiJ _ Car. co ahead and h:zve tJ ft Ira�e 117 EZ- 1_.val+ Ed. 1 �=�1eV. t:1t tint= include c r . _ or t; %:.ice L d r -''' t.. y 11 C_ `V r1. 1 ✓_:Ilav�G« have 2�iC= IG CV- .1.._ Ua5`v _'�era_ ri!"_..•J335 2. the it—== in your Ja.-__r 1 1 v.. 1_-VV_r• '- it II Y.V J`Du succ== Jl Cr- I C:_::CJ�� the I.00c v_V» vl L::e >_ r + L 51/Cj.l• 1 found Lt1�V tll� C..r_V_..r T,JLanv_Y �__� la rrvnV C_ V31� ii C'«•_ Kor:c re_. .al rc Cc» i____ �YCY lrYl '7 J- �� l « 1= 1» �_r- -__ LG Village Far/.W Y , 5C _ C:ic�`:e, the °:.° t7C In =5=.-v of 7100 Vzl_= __ p= k;:n.r to a1== b= parallei_ t. t =_tr=et. ..:nc=► c== G=- �1 v l_VV=_ C_ .. __+�_V E=k; - for �rw____.._ VG u=_ 'V ter= C» hot-h Side= G= th=- uir.C • - . Oricin7-1 ly E 1 LJ' a_» C'r11y --r.;G=_ C•1 Condit-tonal U=- Fermi -L- WEE L_ C 1 E E r u_• E vc_� hl: inCr L.ChMiCa1 L'lavL _ tha a_c v.._ tova� U_ tv r _ 1- d�V � 1 _ yi w_ 1,L _ _ _v:_ , . uc, u: - _ a: Liy daL'•_ :.Y 1 1C D.;.- Wi_- cQVer`vl== vc«ar:v°_ vi cam' C' are Gil t:i=r .,r`,_-rt tiia=: _-.= . _L WGIi -Z• i1$ an = -=-Ve aoc cr =or LL= G,T:2 v c:r =v G; W; �..t _i_rcc .'Lr-• -= w_tLj w%ic;h idea r he_'_- ._-- °=-='-'tom,, . Tile -.. L0 sec 'vh3�1 1 Gain A'a. '�" ` '•11' , , L:JC -.6 C•1G _ C.�.'. 5-;- � back E V _ -_ f h- 7 J rey^,i-2=v a he G M v GT SJ.:3C . . C�a vC ate. lI 1 1 S7-122 Hllcke Sims Applicant's Letter dated j :a received January 20, 19SS p • IL � ►i if a\ � jt:e� •��//''��■i�` � S Sea om 11 '. ��Siii ;4 J� r i( +�t �.r� �'.;• �►�� `��.ev F 4 w..t�, .� w� .\ r . .e. �r.a..Pw�•Y�'. a, '. + 1 �•i '�..�• :� '+ � �,� �Syr �w� •�� ,,� ��Y ♦. ��itiyt..;(3';'�,�.-.—�.�. � t! ��T' �,L.0 t 4� �� ..:.rw t�lil ( \. t� � ��it ti =♦••F eT �\ �• +.a � �: yl .• i t T.V R�RII'�N• �i��, r• t. ' , t',te\ �T ` j`r,' •.r ♦ 'lni' t � .. 1 � T � W:,. w .:�e.� �w.r.�. �', a� �. '. + � IU40if�lliia'ICl 1 SI t � _ ' -" ' t • L � .i. � z• �'�t Z � L tt i t f lit ? � A�dA��t; �: �.`` � :� c �1...11rL � { a� �s�i� rt�:r• t y -f ,r•} ~t � tL � � � • 5 .�;�. L t ,. ��IMV��.. •. w+.. ` ... t1 'Tip �tti 4 +�...: 'i ay+ .y S\ n i�iifw� •v t eta� � ^C t � i i L ! 1; 'a � •.'..+��V � -. z .«; a. � v1 f. t 1 S t S 1''�tit ` - y�' ti ♦h f if Fri `� r,t ^ � p. � •+ ♦: L \ t'I `� \♦ ! �{r;. t it �Vry L1 1 � 6` ; ..= tf , t t.L ±��.. �\..; -,t\o-�� t y '��( y iai ♦�f � ♦ 'i. tt 1 ♦ \ ,�t;\w�'�'� ♦F ) i t. 1t yi ' t° .+� �\ ~ t ♦� T ' ` >f., � .iM\.t ?.� y • +`. �F 4Y. r, t • i ,t - R \ F1 1 l 1 � n \ �.yt r , .♦ t \ y1 yRi } p.` L 5 � . ♦t '♦- �\ Y '7'�.�, t a . ♦ t � t �\ I` . . i'.. t °t �.• 9 'l LA�i`' aL 1; ♦ 1 t.; t \.`. r-' y a`' � \\e .+a� t � i� � �� t • +y ,il! -a 3. \yjt st t >r'-y r1' if S 1 f \I:� t y, _C�. 1 t\ 4 .T p`c't 1{1 ar• �,l i -�> o F t i ,t t l F a�� ♦ i�F.t. t.y 1L\ y_,.iF �_ � if i ♦, 't \ � .\t♦ 1' \` it-y - '� �\ y' �!� � t \.� t i l.� t.L i �1.� � �.i � t 4 (,��.'i,�r'+t� •.0 - vAdb 1` t- ♦ i ` t ! t•+\1 ♦{,."F 1 \,. t i t .� ti ,� .t afq zt a - ♦i'''j;t ♦,.,i t Y ♦ y ei Si F. t � '1` . l-' •'e �!.s`', t yt � � f Iti r. t+ 1 f � 4f' � t t • ' r v t L- fr� ,L t •tf. ♦i.+ ;.y + 1., _ r � ' .4r \ a ,._��.,I•k y L ?i.yv ai T t % t ;�, ' t C f. t +,t .:�., .1�;� ., ,r page 1 _Dori HUCKE 25 Crocker Ave. , Piedmont, CA. , 94611 — (415) 547 5666 khkkkkkk�ckk�c�c�+ckk�c�ckkkJ:k-r.f;-Y,J:rf:�khkkkkkk•I;kk�:t.l;kkkkkklck��+ckJct�:khkkk R � C1= I .Y. ED _ ,r R�'tP.RCS CG'JC�R:lING CONDITIO' AL U r F�RdIi CQ� " 12 PA67-122 HUCKE CiL:l3 DUBLIN PLANNING FREPAR:D FOR ;U LIN PLANNING CO's ATE:ION 1d TT_`!G MAY 2, 1966 A very simple application for two. directory signs in the front � - area of the property from 7615 to 7150 Village__ge Parkway that was outlined in my letter of August 23 , 1997 .?ems to have turned into a loner drawn. out and complicated procedure and I feel that we are uy-necessarily taking your time for a very minor matter. My original application - and idea - was to put- up two d r=otory signs to help the tznaat= in the rear portion of the ccmple:, to reach customers and tell them where they are located. My idea of flexible -"h011ght a CC=—rCmise�, i needed, WOUI location Was IleXlbl be si^—�_-+1e and easy . Certainly I was one: star, suc_ges`viO;:s. FowEve' .- bi ^ seemed to Cork L' i mmed:avel:. . _ , two rC3�: i_�CLs 1 . The property in the SCli'vrl rears Bldg 15 , Where three of the tenants badly need a D=re:torY sign, ie_C 5 Yid mV Wif 2 r :�atilry�+ F. Hucke and Was deeded her in 19627 tit no sub-diyi:icn uian wa_ ever de � -^2"' � a./ tra.n.sfeY The :act• is that• NO velo.e:. r� t:�._ - CttD-pIVIGION is , or wa=,� 'eauired since the rcpe.-ty. was 02"iQin311y Sllb-dlvld2: and not more than :OUR of those lots are .v L^... T nckC ?4 involved . The G.uat� Asses_._ ' office lsu:hed at me �' S7-122 Hucke Sig,n 3 9pplicant's Written Statement, Planni: Commission Heetin, May 2, 1988 ,r - 7 Page 2 about it - Mrs. Hucke's rear building is a portion of Lots s , 4 and 5 , Tract 2662 and is properly and fully a separate parcel 941 -210-5-5 on F.larte�a County Tax rolls. This could very easily have Veen checked by ref erri ; to the City of Dublin s��b-divisio ordnance Whlt�ti '�1l� CO__eO =rom the Alameda County ordnance acrid has i ordna.. been used by the City of Dublin since 1° 2. This Bids. 5 has no access to the street without proper Fee-ments as noted below. 2. There apparently has been a question as to the legality Of a _-` directory sign on Lot 2 applying to tenaTt_ in the rear of Lots 4 and 5'. Mrs. Hucke owns the front building on the south end and the southern rear .building - my designation as Buildings 4 and 5 . Eoth deeds have plain y w''�tt° non e:iclus've easements IOY 1�C''e c_d egress over the envi crA.,.nc 'and drive ig _areas i.. all G_ Lots 0 G � an 5 . COpies Of =se deeds were furnished to staff in my let'ver Of August- 2J, ic I as noted. 1 don", blame them a bite for me,.;- n:. bounds as written - it is a Civil not tracing Out the II? A ? have a dickens c_' a time follcwi a Engineer`s Gree>; an.. - line la-� vey_nc class ca collece in 1921 y a^d - - - - i i e3= the: iCW, the -7u!-! v GCV2Y o v=!- ' It Wa-I1 v there no Yea=On whatever why the one =:gn _Z f re:- easement and o, 7100 V lll3v'a f 31 iw��' C :i.OV 1151 te:3:1•e in Mrs . `t'_CKc _ Y?�r bus 3 • The o- properties were rive= lding as we a. those c•r, Lot t'o Mrs- . Hucke a: di :fei'en'. times which L_turally re_: _ted in two Ia Cr b '' • by `meda Cozr-tv a= deed_ and two �3:-gel ='a_e i e..:' 94i_2,10-5-5 and 941-21Or -S and are adjacent and cOn:•; vZu-us- 1t• Certainly Seem- to me that they should be considered as one parcel in this action . i Page 3 ciat I appre e staff allowing a directory sign as big as 2'Z square feet, and that will be perfect for the -one in front of 7100 sign pr:;h.ably car: have Village Pa'L%`.7a1 . }�G4le'/er , .ile so-called -- es cm ` This proper-.y is a separate piece • only three tenon.. nom__ �^ i .,. _ belonging to my daughter Sutton and bile there is a common i u_=s _vn as to the legality of any easement driveway there is som e c ' ,. i t =ense in arguing about it. f between us and there is no c i , •.-.�. However, with only three t_ ant names on =it, certainly 22 _quaYe feet is far too larce. I would suggest a sign 4 feet wide and 5 } feet high, and because of the shape of the space where it has to I go, it should be parallel to the street rarher than at/ right l � i es. That way it will - entirely In Mr=. Suttc 'S _^"oJCrt:l an:a ang v y set back from the sid°_wa_i: I Page 4 i Hobbies - so as to catch cnssming cars uaf sre they Vet tG she driveway and can no longer turn in. There is an ideal space there back as far as staff ws it 1 ike to have it and 1 think they are quite right to want it at right angles to the str?et. Tenants have i approved such placing wit 1sut question. ?dine or ten tenant names ` can easily be printed on a 32 square feet directory. 1 For the "P." directory siy^:: 1 ask that permission be granted to use the same design as the Direc tory at 6591 Sierra Lane, a picture of s_c�ad i lett dated ry , which is shown on the page of m• __VV_ dat_ .;anua_ 1:� 1988 . It fits in far bett=r with the architecture of cur buildings 1 any gets away irom any a:-earazce of growing up out c a _lower pot. Much more approp ;.ate fcr Village ;arkway amd `;V-he Du'ZIi n atu,OSOhBre. Certainly _' they were allowed to pL't t :at Cc up o: Sierra Lane we sh ould ha':2 -the same privilege. The sic Will be completely boxed in sc as to hide the support po All of the tenants dir-actly concerned, ca tie soul,''. ___ of the and T -e, are cat c � 1 y oppose tc c,13ny-^ t:i_ 3r G� - _ Sou ti, driveway to "drive _z" instead of o ly" c= it is The natural f iOw of tra;_ :c. in and there; vile C-cmple\ wcL._d ie i t messed up, but rood. As it is, trucks, delivery van= a:::. cus-Cmers mostly come in the center larger rivewsv s:.d turn zi:`:= north or south - then naturally* o but the twc e^.d driveways. Fcr a large I truck or semi- it is aimps, impossible curing t•he da t turn around and go back . We tried two-way traffic in it wild continual complaints as well as a lot of scraped auto_. It is, tvi th the fence and the gas meters barely 19 feet wide. Probably, the Page 5 biggest problem, is the cheater who turns left from Lewis 3t. and swings some 20 to 25 feet the wrong way 1.:-o traffic to save going on to Amador Valley and making a "U" fora. The police and traffic folks over at City Hall asked us to make i "EXIT" only and while that hasn't totally curd the problem - there are always guys who will "take a chance" - ;_t is much bettar. You might ask the tenants from EOx World or John's Transmission who see the traffic picture every day . - Ina=_much as it seems that tie easement on Mrs. Hucke's deeds makes a sign way down there totally unnecessary, it is sort of _ moot ! (fLf stian. - i .� i COM'•{ANTS ON NUM-En D I^E:�i�. Oil trG 2 0 RESOLUTION N0. �--- 1 , 2, AND 3 - Apply to wall sign and sit2 review. i 4 . I believe I have coverad Lhe reason=_ W;._+ and how the } envire matter can be c.:ve:ad by c _y .wo direct-cry ? signs, quite legally wti h Flannl C C� tiS=1QP. OK 1 s i _ 5 . They wont be i E. see4 / 7 . Covered in above - variance on si r, "B" requz_ted Page E i 9 . OK _ 10. categorically opposed to using south driveway as entrance; fully covered in above 11 . Believe this is the function of the Planning Department However, I will certainly s4 to it that all new tenants are advised to consult with the Planning Department before putting up or painting any new signs and cooperate with the Department in any way that I can. 12 . I 'll be happy to consult with the DepEp as to the actual wording and layout of the sign. 13 . OK 14 . I believe this is not applicable here. 15 , 0; , but I '1'_ appreciate a little help. Respectfully su Limitted by Don Hueke, Ka:,hryn F. Hucke and Phyllis H. Sutton, 25 Crocker Ave. , Piedmont, Calif. 94611 -- (415) 547-500-6 f • r AV / li / •'� ,�j,�l ��...�.1.. r 'r!� ;; y, /,/. � .. /. t./w//'�"'►•'��'J /,r!//:1�/%�f(j.1, /, r( ,/ � �/ji�'%� ./j/ / 1/f,!/.�/�7.�'1�'�. /'� ."y/I°,l I/ :..�, '//� %.'f/'•i..r'�' 1'; ]J �Y/�(,, �,/ /� C 1. ♦.•.,/r' ..'.� rd� /� Arm / iii ,. / /� C 1. ♦...�.. '�:. 1 /� ///•►iii '�t� ,� rl' ,n..1 /,S•,%n.'.i l �d 'fU!J�r++'•%Lir�;S/•�f,%'N' J./•{.,'��.�.j!/,'f'�'Yir. .�"/R/''.!I��,l, •�.',%� �• �.�.y/�j'...,:/'' , /•rf/'��'EAw� lr r• �Y.�.. iXi/ti,�flr{ I''' , 7.Pi••;.rrlf,i,, / i i/%.,, / /.. ,;,�1„ ,/•i/ .. '.. ';�.•'••.•' 1•/�r�. r '�f'j,�, .�1�%/ //� / /� / C•% /,it '. .�'i!'f,I / � '�%j. /� ; //•••ii/. •/ ��.//',�i•1/:li�/�/' C/��'Y M //ry}/f ,��.! i/ /f., �� .. /�.Idl,4 1/'h /.•� 'L:...Sj.,'�1'.,r'. .r.'i. 1 .' !l�.i:/,•y i.j";;71•'•T•� �'`r!•,�:i�,y'..4',jl��,%lif�/ ,i nr. � 'f/'•./� .%l� l�y� �;✓.1�/Y,.: .i//,r iq. _ _. "' �:� ''• ;,•IIr:,�.,�fir•, ,' ;;:r;��,; •�•?' ,/':,� ,'; ,; ,/.,, � 1>.�,• ;_�'„ : rr,•: ",. . �..�' �/•i 4•Yl' .I�.i;l:'�%%:.�,i../ �%�i•ri/��•�'ih�r^.1`i I•. �/,�%•, l.!•,~ ''''1 ,�.!Y' /Iii%'• r•• .. '/' A r'a' 1/'y .a 1./,1+,�.}� l,i ,�,.J��'• '` '- •' •'" ,.r.. ••jam/', .•, ../,/• �• •%:y''it '�;�L'j;%':�/'./•.v;lj., !sf�.7� ,ir'�%•r/1'.rj'�1,�,lfr,;•t..:�jr,y7.i.�';i✓�'-•ice,•/ •/�•.+/^� °,,��•,.J,3•. ,r/,fry, ,,��,,r /,. _. :/''/,'i !�!✓� �%�:u if,.^y r'!'�:ja;�•�JH �•' .✓/ jG�'�:'C�:V'rr!, ayJ /� �'/• ..�a SC!� .%.'�.,��;� /.' _/ •,'.,.:�, .!. •r• ":/ '�1.{•:/S •,r/;'�1;•',r/•.�;,^�!,�:.:�/fi��'O�iC ,Y�,� r,`•,,r,,,J.;�:.•...' ,' •�• /.,�,;~ �j... ✓,/;1 y,•,. .. �i. . 'i �%i ./.• ','.t.l!1'\i,(.f,•!,t./ ,l�,y r.,;,1 ..r. •i! 'y.,ry ':. '.i,% ' ':./••'• '/••' !��':,�,✓,� ]•j/' •/, .. .•�• 'Oii%i�"�;di1�yL.L1i' 1'%/i/�i;/: •;i,•r„ ::r/!�:�•./�/�.;t;'�'U•r!'I; •!irk-: �•_ .y••,.•:♦�.0 ;! �!! - -- ....—..._... ;",�,�'�.,.��,<r;itiri'rr��f,�ay�.,'�„ .,,:�' 1L.�r-��.:,,�:� ' :!�-�% •s.�.�_-.-:�`�,..:,�.,.,.;::.�ij .....-�::.:.: - --- City :of Dublin- -: Dublin DowntoWn S . pecl . Ic ; P1 an = - Adopted by the City CaMcjl - on July �1, 1987 WURSTER , BERNARDI A--ND , EMMONS / INC . 6 3 \ 57-122 Hucke Sign: Downtown Specific •�' �•: k r ..•�♦ , .`. �:.,..., '" .. .. . .. _. i'� �� ,,ti _ �♦�.•.��,;::=`i �i`�� 4'1 / Plan Excerpts ... '.r.v•,y...,„s''.r••,n.,t.i•::r/.`+i y,,�,:.•.'f F r�—f.ttJJ%/I.i%r/f,.Y q •.'•.!1!.!Y1'•;.M:-.%t«.'..�..�•..�)•'�f....l` ••b.•"..,✓,.''r/"+';.� _. ..,'%',•r^�R.:!-�i•.7'',;y•.:�•?.�'r'';;:.%rG.[.:.{.....��yi%/ iC+,../'r/,lff0%yv".iI%i•Ln✓r��•r..Y�I'%'!�f��i^,1'r r•i",•;•?4''�••.:.7�..'rrii.I. 1�:�l/'aer r�•!r r r'��.'i,�•y.y'r i '[ :':7•.•'. �f'l::f•9.•%r!•;:rFlf11,$:' •;'l �C✓r,.r..{..', °j',• -r r:[ -'.a'.ri-�.� . ... ....,......, .'' .�.. r �! �' - 'rte'-y�:.��' 'r% ',i�' jL.::.�::..'::i::'". .•..':....J.:i..��.',l.:u.,.:'.:.%:.:rlu.:� ../lc�c/rl:�.%'1L:.��..,t�r.l�/! An increase of height over a portion or all of the site up to that specified in the Development Standards section yy of this report may be granted if the city ,finds that such an increase would not be detrimental to adjacent residents. 11) The city shall seek the creation of a downtown plaza space for joint public and private uses. E. UpBPN DESIGN 1) Additional public improvements within the downtown area shall be used to identify the area more strongly with the City of Dublin. 2) The city shall require adequate landscaping between sidewalks and parking lots. 3) The city shall encourage and require a high level building, landscaping and signing quality. 4) Properties adjacent to the freeways shall be required to adequately landscape the edges of their property as rte' part of any development approval. 5) The use of tar and gravel roofs shall be discouraged. J6) Substantial a_e_s of sloped roofs shall be encouraced. The use o 7) _ f colorful fabric awnings shall be encouraged. m g) A strong pedestrian environment shall be encouraced along P_-aador Plaza Road. r 9) Uses along San Ramon Road shall be encouraced to increase their orientation toward that street and to implement appropriate building and landscape improvements. F. IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING 1) Implementation of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan shall be considered a joinlZ public and private sector erfort . The city shall re-eval•late the plan i;a_plement.Etion progress annually to determine whet-her private sector participation and cooperation warrants the continuation of projected' public funding levels. 2) The city shall consider the establishment a city-wide Business Business Licens° Fee Program. 3) The city shall esitablish a Traffic Monitoring Program to periodically assess current and projected traffic impacts and shall take appropriate actions to revise the downtown or other area plans to maintain traffic congestion at levels acceptable to the city. 12 'I/'..,1'��A/j/ ,f�JI'dl 6 j�r// ,�I*f�'�'ll,h`'�{��.;,7�;, ',/'� r' :.'..r,��' ,i��'�"Y,�.i„✓�C`f�,, �� VV , nht�"rn✓I C'✓;y'N�/Yi�� ,�'/ltji{ /�,��1�r� if r., ��5. 14JN• .r/� , i I\V11 'r/ice � .t� - ,.•\ �� •' � V. tA i •'t 1 `•1 -,I Zones Map • � Development _ DUBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN 6M;2w� 4 „1 t DUBLIN, -CALIFORNIA 9 Diagram 10 Zone $• Restaurant and Specialty Retail Located between I-520 and the proposed Dublin "Restaurant Row" this zone will be encouraged over time to increase its pedestrian orientation for restaurant, specialty retail and entertainment uses. Zone 9 : Amador Valley Boulevard Cc=ercial Strategically---situated in a good location relative to traffic access within the downtown area, this zone will be encouraged to intensify its development in the future. A mix of uses with some two or three. story structures is desired. Design cohesiveness amonc* portions of the area will be strongly encouraged. Proposals providing direct access to San Ramon Road will be- considered. Zone 10 : Villace Parkway Mixed Use Currently occupied by a wide mix of commercial uses, this zone will continue to serve a variety of needs in the future. Visual landscape and building design improvements will be soueht to compliment the city's substantial investment in public improvements along Village -Parkway. Zone 11 Retail/Office. Located on two streets which serve 1� e nearby residential population, this area will continlu'r-as^a mix of commercial uses. S,-,,ail scale resident-serving offices such as medi- cal or dental offices will be encouraged alone with retail uses oriented to the nearby residential areas. Proposals which incorporate residential uses will be considered. INTERIM USE ZONES EW Four areas of Downtown Dublin have been identified as interim use zones. These are areas which will likely remain in their current use for &6-he foreseeable future but for which sL'bst nti al later char-ge is possible. interim use standards will be developed for each zone to allow current uses to continue and to encourage property changes where acp:e_o=iate to miti cc.te negative visual + impacts on adjacent properties. Interim use zone locations and general standard are shown on Diagram 11 . Interim Use Zone a: r , J This area curre�nt.ly contains three warehouse structures containing non-retail uses and a large vacant property. The area is the 6otential location for a BART Park- and-Ride facility initially and a later parkin resource for a BART station- or other regional 31 1 i •� 1 j y I /f '//. r r''�, %�:./'� �I •jr „•J Mr,•I (. /�y./ fI(t ��✓r�y(✓/L'IM•I•/'.1 / 'i "/,r �•r. ,f !, r,!�•!/r'/ii.�✓:'��•�t'4.7,Y''' /,iA•.; ''./I '�/;,, i`./ /J 'i ' i•,.,i/. .,/ , 'd�.F� •. ICl/ir4, � � '%�, ,J;I >I: / .,, , ..y'^", %�"`ici�'1,:,.�AU,i'L1:..4��//.C� A��.1"'s•':.'j'y e,f.'�" �. +re �'/••' �'� Yr►' s .r.v...,.i'/r•.;i, q�i:iQ.�Si�.G.�r'.�.:i:, .... .,,.. ,I'•�w%'• __ '�G�s..ss-.s� �,G:':.r.A.:G'i,'"i'1.�f✓d'.«2a.�..« .�,,. .. ........ ROPERTY CHANGES SHALL INCLUDE%. CREASED LANDSCAPING AND VISUAL. ANY ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO EX1S.fING: `� .':' i�:%��!� DEVELOPMENT SHALL STRUCTURES ;� v `�•`•` ` JS ►t�'�c= �� K CONTINGENT UPON �, •, �a �^ SCREENING SERVICE USE �� . ^T V T . .AND INCREASED �}: 1; .;�'� o' LANDSCAPING INTERIM USE LIMITED TO AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP It It �, ice•` �� .f � c. `��,. 0 tT tenL It L !� ANY PARKING L DEV ELOPMENT SHALL BE ADEQUA LYAANDSCAPED V PROPERTY I�ti1PROVESOF NEW _ STRUCTURES SHALL BE LIMITED TO REQUIRE CONSTRUCTION EXISTING BUILDINGS OR THOSE RELATED I ' ROADWAY TO REGIONAL TRANSIT. ACTIVITIES OR TRANSIT-COMPATIBLE C0PAMERCIAL USES se Zones and Standards Interim U DUBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA i - Diacram 11 32 i; -1'1. .J Ir,�'iI Y/,i%�' v1��r (,! p�,=Y:' �r ✓ /i ✓ � , � •f.•;�:`I fir/ti r !'i ''��i/i� �jr i..��,%i�l.r/��ly;Tr M� - /:! �/ '�' � / . .., f /I / ,7'�,f• ,111 / //�/ I / transit facility. The need to accommodate these potentials in the future combined with the property' s current relative isolation from Dublin Boulevard requires a different set of development standards than would be desirable for a future commercial mixed' use project related to a ��egional transit facility. Interim standards should: a) prohibit development which would preclude the economical development of transit parking. b) Require recognition that the property is highly visible from Interstate 580 and does much to establish the image of Downtown Dublin. C) Allow for a new street connecting Regional Street and Golden Gate Drive. d) Recognize the limited retail potential of the - : property until --roadway and transit improvements are implemented. e) Require an overall master plan emphasizing a mix of commercial uses for long term change for the area =prior to the approval of any additional structures or uses. Interim Use Zone B: CurrenC industrial occupied largely by older type structures, this area is in marked contrast to other development in the downtown area. While the area will eventually change, current ownerships patterns and the relatively sound condition of the structures suggest that some time may pass before substantial change will occur. Interim standards are needed to improve the apc_ earance of this area and should: a) Require substantial additional landscaping along the Village Parkway frontage as a condition of any future property improvements. b) Encourage improvements to the visual character of existing structures. C) Encourage additional landscape improvements to all parking areas. Interim Use Zone C: Auto dealership= uses contained in this zone are felt to be an asset to Downtown Dublin and will be encouraged to remain. However; it is realized that in the longer term, increased land values may eventually:;precipitate a change in land use. Development standards for this zone will be i - 33 - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS >>, z - Table C s / DOWNTOWN DUBLIN DEVELOPM ENT ZONES 1 2 g q 5 g ? g 9 10 11 LAND USES • • • • • • • • • �.: ir. �• RETAIL STOKES • • • `�;'�,' �1, OFFICES • • • • • • ;:.: '��, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS • • • • • • t` .' = 3 • RESTAURANTS (NON FAST FOOD) ® • • • • • • • • : , ,��. IIOTEL/Mt7,TfL • `-� • • • • ; a SERViCth COMMERCIAL • • • 0 • • • • • MM IA -RECREATION/ l�J • • • • • JTFR RESIDENTIAL • • • l�1 w AUTOMOIILE SALES/SERVICE • • ` DRIVE-IN BUSINESS • • t !. AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION • • - ■CN DISTRICT SHOPS& SERVICE . . AUTOMOBILE REPAIR FACILITIES •M-1 DISTRICT USES ` REGIONAL TRANSIT FACILITIES • • `/ '�� • OTHER C-1 DISTRICT USES � ' �•,• - OTHER C-2 DISTRICT USES OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 0.30 O.SO 0.30 0.30 i MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO* 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.70 0.35 45 35 35 t ' ►.4AxunuM IllDr,. IIEIGIIT (FEET) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 35 O i I � PCRMITTEO CONDITIONAL USE t '. r d L=SUIIIECT TO PLANNING PERMITTED ON AN INTERIM OASIS COMMISSION REVIEW AND APPROVAL AS SUPPORTAIVE OF DOWNTOWN GOALS O LIMITED TO SECOND FLOOR OR ABOVE SPACE ONLY * AN INCREASE TO MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO MAY III PERMITTED LAND USES WILL BE DFFIrJ[D AS 711E ZONING BE CONSIDERED THROUGH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING PROCESS OP.DIIJACE IS AMf.NDCD I . I ItJCIl1DING FAST fOOD KCSTAURANTS 1 i ' + �V 1 j•,i. � 1 �.1 •1`J' t \ i is \ \ ••�, •'1 IL ./ ♦•�' ,,y yl+,.r CtIKr'.n , \( .��J r � _�• 1 • � F.h.• -. C\�.•�-_� - �, '` � -fir 1 _ ��.I � ,�,, • -� • . ;,r�- •♦ ..,,, Ali;= , �_• ,,` �� ,:.`.,:; ;, ,. Or ♦.- wry_. .\`\/ '•y \ \' •' I \, /410Y ZJ•CO. -� - -�_ _'• ✓,1 �',� \.l \-. \`V ,;,.� ,� ,-— . • .,:rte•• ., ' , \`� •`',+� \``;\ L r �` rte- ?i '� J. •A ti ,\ S /= Jy \ \,•. G •D\ . � i�\ ,�;� . •', act' � �=`. -_ • • _• '�'. • \ \ � _/ -j `� `r\�, (vim�.(--( , ` 771 r,•-n r.r�g l 87-177 }IUCkE` jl ils I INIc :3 TAI t= FOU1•C' 'G,9c7 (N. Iocltan) --- .-._-...- _____A --=al- I 'i t. •t'.r• ,__ .. .lnl•R. ..__.. ...w-......... ......-9,0•Q,... . .. .. I:e e• - -. � IYn.nn 1 '� 4 t.•• t Y!r' 1 ,n' a �,-�' •I •q _ )(-Il kl , -A_11w.1' i } ✓ 1 S4ry. 111 -1 I �1' t.`• I�ol ,117 fj--- v.` �_ G• - 6LD6. -A E�C N?Eh CX151'��IG �1 iL01ti_�..,r2 I ' ,I c �. •• vso .�Q. '': t. ._.-1C, �� _ P� O.•t ;. 1(710 Y ff C W;\-S- I ;� t w11 't•r Y� ', /.►.t\.•Y).f 1 l I.I.l l.1\s•'11 _r• a i I '' �• 3 •lr�t 7116 7L40- may} i ... '�• \) :.�;. •,'/y.\ ♦��-,�1' \, .•,•�•�. `.,�•, '�10:� •7106 V k.C. r.vlul o.r.a d /108..,1i .. .i l+ I'l ♦ I.` . *..,\''•\�•\'T04i♦ :70 0- �..tl,,...r.•.•.. -- 1112 -.i. 4 1117 r1--__. _l,twf •. Nvlr• •f r��1!,C.•••t 1181\ � 1 I I I 1 1 � 4 � �:.'�1 .f.y�t`'•. r ♦ .tl 1.1.1 __ III./ +- .• ♦ .i`11 P4.1�� It Z' '.�• °iC ",rai 'i!a-' -11•' �1'• �i 'il- �'l �i[f-.�. Tftt• .. _ a�L� ..._ .- Iw'• ., .:.r• a. 1, ,•/r t!♦•!.�Lr S.I 1'rw•i•fly,I r, I L•i S11 .I, R.... • I (.. ..f 1 i 1 '`. • ' 'Ir'r' E t v'a ;• •� 1 t• i C'.c vat �•i..wJ..j'` •' t 1 t ,'i'�a� 't , 1 i i � •�� f •� I �:-....tw.v )l.d: \r 'I �� 1, -_ ..__. _ • -N • t 1 Ft 1 1 -1.' j i it I I a �•' y,e r� o•t 4 va.7 '� _ \ t J. '1. 1 1 1r , r.• F r ?. u _ ]!al.t_ L i-1 � L.r 1-1 J. L.L t J�' F'%.•,•1 : �I :i !iJ. .f +� I1 i1 t1 �_1__.VI 11111 !1 1 ± i \•:� .i I �? .�: 1 ' �' __.K2 - 1 " -� 3 1.iL�1�J�_� s t1 r• ' ,•1 It•� -\p$[Q},.�•��. ..I' I [�1 I 1 I .L�! - ?..�._..«..1, •' •) a•..r..�.,1n h.r...�, - �' r �M l :YPHa .1. rr��_ `«_ -I lru. •�:...r r•: r N 1 i, ri 1 �'•'1 111:1 'hQ-1. -_ , ! ••. ua raw. I .. s I •t. V.-a •... O'asta . [;•.t. h,rra t.1a Lfa'r.`-a.. jl ti-... p 4.G Y.o re o..a�b•nrca __ --- '--I ` f.., ['. !�_ . I .S .... .• _ a•.l!L[ i ''t . �►.era ;.1" W4.. •118 e - less X41, •. .1 ,. l •w.p h1L.let, /.Jyl'.:1,•� �' `I• '`• •� . ' 1 Nl.r.a.. . I / f''1 ..If Rl.1t I. ••`'�-If1.1 I,tl,•... 1 1 ' �••1. i .. •' i41' • 1P ;�]• � . � �- •l • •� v _ 1 ° 'I•'1 to ' ,'7 ` V6, P',L 6'6, r_ - • '' \.. VI J �} i I 3 ;T`.;:.: ��_ t' °c l �.�t��. "4 (' 5T N'�� I�L�G:�3 :i e �; I ,� N F?; D� 'I I wi I �zre s•c�QR MCItL �+` •�i 1;0•1:0 • .[.r• ., 2V.IG��• • \ 1[CPO Nrt,: . ' \ •I•• t' ! �: !'�:�.: r to . • 1• • L', /f., fru f •i- ..r•a e' •1,t./ g : :. •vrl „•,f.. fm 1•!:.1.11 ;. .n•1!10 1 • . fly I • q• ..t• t•.t•11.,f..a..t'u.. f t.0 e• u �r • 4.1118 / .1 �+' ' ••��' '' vlll• 1•.tr.0 It f••s•r •f L' • l• • � � ` •• tl' I •' nsn>=pro /� I � / .! •! q '�' '- [.It.a:.t:...::::n.:i:•i a«µ...11 f f a "',- )tl7• . , �'.r...,.� t•..• �, I';= ,. •; ':� ;:- T. r.113 /r.•• .,t•r.r„•t ..11 r•Ir.. ... �c: � .f •e•.t•r r! 1. i' f 1 •r •. O i t'' r.:•.tr•:fl. 1 f 114 ` l� ^ • � i :A..t.. • q •.wr N t.. •.l a s•rs• •sA� a1. •,�• .. I. tul Utl• ,u.1•••. .tt A• U to/:H•l7 TJt'^r''' •1 1•fU..,... ,1.. ybut b N 1•f!•:.u. •'- �-.ti'_:. N A� tagt.•r 11•. u,. r,,. t. IC I �.• .,� ..f.:uu.. lll�� r� � 1 rr q• 1, I .�.. ••5' •.1 p►-. • �, Ate. �� ; ,, I ��' ,, � .� �� :,.: �� :,i _ f.��w,,;�:,'.J , �� .:�_; !alit -,OSO 7018 .'7044 Tor `• b _ ly S•' r.: r•• ,1"' r' 1.{' "lii' 1 ,. y 70661 •. TB u I '100 '/ .7io` -� 71C! 7114 ., -./'• l �. �ii• rte-_ _•._ .. - _.- �,� a•r�..�.n:ea 1.►.�--� 711 '`''� i � `�;�` 1. a•�� `,1 � i 'TIRE-)17D.•=- TFEE---TRCL .7,,^„_�•4�a?L ♦' -1.1• \ •��- t L A G E ,'� 1 • e3i. ^~{t w ' -` ".r••.- , c•:= t;t;! 1 1 {- P A r K VJ A 7 . \ _l�'.'• -. 1.`11 P L O T L. A N z �•._ >�. , � - --•---1',11-:1 i ! n 4�1�t1• _ 1 . n �. ,1lftttfll(,.L we M.0".CAW. FILE COPY tmI.1 DO[ l [t .btrue rw •`fly; :v*.y„ - { _.. ."•. ., .... . . ''•- -. _ .. _. L:.1 Relx•av CL^.G 07 � trd •':. . .-L..._ ' �::%t.•I -_ - •;.��An�i - . .- ?'i 7 S �„• :re y. / J• ,. re. a7 l tai» SSOP'S MAP 941 210 :�• cad. /.. Na1.16-001 Scale-I's 200• MAP CFA SUB.OF PLAT OF THE OC(JGHERTY RANCH(POR,PLOT 59)cBw pvm TRACT 2662(skmN 36) P•M.1032(ek.79 ft2c) 1 TRACT 2717(P.k.5ODp•38) PM 2i49"Pya6) P.M. 2166(ek.9aPg.12) too -� �QOCaq � �N? -�-%J.:::�.;.;.�� t yam: /J �• - � O V I ' t tOPA.M Ins , s u � ,. arnn-r,so' II --- - 206 — w.00+ r�tr.vJ. ...oa., Zia k. G. I p a• nI •� It �i• M ♦M , It.• —+-: � f flirt • ^� , �OtJOUCd/ a ••+m, •-••- I O. i t E) �..... t t n nr /I t 2C6 OlpM�fly sl • 19 1 t Im. tOOal0/ r- - ifJ• - • .••� ADO •" 207 I6 O.Q ��.� r�r; ttw�v/ 2 rt 1500 1 140' c.,•.,� .�.;`iy'../ trr.rol• /'�•�\. it ♦`� 1401 � 207 APA