Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.1 BART Dublin/Pleasanton Extension l0 CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 23, 1989 SUBJECT ORAL COMMUNICATION - Presentation by Representatives of the Bay Area Rapid Transit District regarding Proposed BART Dublin/Pleasanton Extension Project Report Prepared by: City Manager EXHIBITS ATTACHED o Notice of Preparation of Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed BART Dublin/Pleasanton Extension Project o Notice of Community Scoping & Information Meeting - Flyer -- - RECOMMENDATION . Receive presentation FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION The Bay Area Rapid Transit District is presently undertaking environmental review and preliminary engineering for the development of the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Extension. The proposed extension would start at the existing Bayfair Station and continue to the Dublin/ Pleasanton area. BART is also considering a project alternative for an ' additional 2-mile extension to the East Dublin/Pleasanton Station. During the next several weeks, the BART District will be holding scoping/ information meetings to get the public involved in the Dublin/Pleasanton Extension EIR. Those public sessions which have been scheduled are noted on the attached Notice of Community Scoping and Information Meeting. Staff has requested that BART make a presentation to the City Council prior to the public scoping sessions in order that the Council might understand the process which BART will be undertaking over the next year. This presentation is only for Council information and is not a public hearing. _ The City Council will be able to have additional opportunities to provide comments to BART during the process . T t.� -------------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: ITEM NO. r RECEIVED JAN 121989 CITY nc DUBLIN TO: Agencies FROM: Bay Area Rapid Transit District (Lead Agency) 800 Madison Street P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, California 94604-2688 Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed BART Dublin/Pleasanton Extension Project [References: Division 13, Public Resources Code, Section 21080.41 The Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) proposes to construct and operate a 12-mile, two-station, extension_of the BART system from the existing Bay Fair Station in San Leandro to the Dublin/Pleasanton area. This proposed extension is the initial phase of a future BART extension to Livermore. The planned extension would provide through service to other BART destinations in the Bay Area. Stations are proposed for Castro Valley in the vicinity of Redwood Road and Norbridge- Avenue and West Dublin/ Pleasanton near the I-580/680 interchange. BART is considering a project alternative of a 2-mile extension beyond the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station site, with a third station located in East Dublin/Pleasanton near the future I-580/Hacienda Drive Interchange. The proposed project includes phasing scenarios related to projected ridership for the years 1995, 2000, and 2005; an interim park/ride facility at the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station sites and parking design options. The _ EIR will also address possible Joint Development at BART stations which may include retail services, office space, or other development options to be determined through cooperative planning by BART and local communities. This Notice of Preparation is submitted to inform you that BART will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an Enrvironmental Impact Report for the proposed project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . Caltrans, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, will prepare the federal environmental documentation related to joint use of the transportation corridor. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency' s statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed BART extension. A project description is attached for your review. Probable environmental effects to be addressed in-t-he EIR will include: - • Traffic and parking impacts at the two proposed stations in Castro Valley and West Dublin/Pleasanton and the third station alternative in East Dublin/Pleasanton including vehicular impacts on the operations of intersections adjacent to stations; the adequacy of station parking supply in relationship to ridership forecasts for three time periods (years 1995, 2000, 2005) ; internal station circulation; pedestrian linkages with adjacent residential areas and commercial uses; impacts to the freeway system; interface with other planned transit systems (San Ramon Valley Corridor transit service) and roadway improvements proposed by local communities (such as Forest Avenue and Lake Chabot Road in Castro Valley) ; and — traffic impacts for cumulative development in station study areas. • Noise and vibration for both the construction and operation of the proposed BART track alignment art' stations. • Air quality impacts, with a focus on increases in carbon monoxide and other vehicular emissions from traffic around proposed stations. • Energy consumption from building--and operating the proposed _ extension. • Land use and socioeconomic impacts, such as consistency with adopted local goals, policies, and plans; consistency with current site zoning and land use designations; potential disruption to orderly and planned development; compatibility with adjacent land uses; effects on population distribution, density, and growth rate; potential disruption or division of established communities or neighborhoods; effects on neighborhood character and stability; effects on existing housing, including possible displacement of residents and businesses; effects on community facilities (including medical , educational , religious, recreational) ; effects on the local tax base. -- • Visual impacts, such as compatibility of the proposed Dublin/Pleasanton Extension Project with the existing community/neighborhood design character and scale of development; potential obstruction of views and scenic vistas from properties adjacent to elevated guideways or stations; view impacts from adjacent roads and scenic highways; conformance with local community design review objectives as stated in individual community general plans and policies (such as the Dublin and Pleasanton scenic highway policies for the I-580 corridor) ; new view potential created by elevated structures; light and glare impacts. • Police, fire, emergency medical service, and utility impacts. • Biological , cultural resource, s$rface and groundwater, and geologic impacts. Due to the time limits mandated by State law your response to this NOP must be sent at the earliest possible date. A 30-day response period has been specified for this project from the date of this notice. Responses are due by February 13, 1989. T _ Four scoping meetings are panned during the response period as follows: • Agency Scoping: Friday, January 27, 1989, at 2:00 p.m. in the BART Board Room, 1st Floor, 800 Madison Street in Oakland (Lake Merritt BART Station) • Public Scoping: Monday, January 30, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in San Leandro Community Library Center 300 Estudillo Avenue, San Leandro Wednesday, February 1, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in Castro Valley Norbridge School 399 Norbridge Avenue, Castro Valley Thursday, February 2, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in Dublin/Pleasanton Dublin High School , Little Theatre,: 8151 Village Parkway, Dublin Please identify a contact person for your agency and direct any comments or questions regarding this project to: - Marianne Payne, Project Manager DPX Environmental Analysis Bay Area Rapid Transit District 800 Madison Street P.O. Box 12688 Oakland, California 94604-2688 Telephone: (415) 464-6173 \ , January 10, 1989 -L�-.�y�-\ (Date) (BART S;gnature) Manager of Planning (Title). ATTACHMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR THE PROPOSED BART DUBLIN/PLEASANTON EXTENSION PROJECT 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) proposes to construct and operate a two-station, 12-mile extension of the BART system from the existing Bay Fair Station in San Leandro to the Dublin/Pleasanton area, herein referred to as the Dublin/Pleasanton Extension Project (DPX) . This proposed extension is the initial phase of--a future BART extension to Livermore. The extension would provide through service to other BART destinations. Stations are proposed for Castro Valley and West Dublin/Pleasanton. BART is also considering a project alternative consisting of an additional 2-mile extension beyond the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station. This alternative would provide a third station located in East Dublin/Pleasanton. Figure 1 shows the regional location for the proposed project. 2.0 ONGOING PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS Development of final designs for the BART alignment and stations within the proposed extension is an iterative process requiring close coordination with local jurisdictions and with Caltrans. The environmental review for the project is a major first step in this planning and review process. The environmental review is taking place conctfrrently with preliminary engineering, refinement of projected ridership estimates, and the cooperative planning efforts between BART and local communities for defining Joint Development scenarios at station sites. Extensive interaction with Caltrans engineering and environmental review staff is also required throughout the planning and review process. For this project, BART has established a rigorous public information program and schedule for agency and community meetings. Input to the planning and review process is provided by monthly Project Development Team -� Meetings with Caltrans and the Alameda County Transportation Authority; and planned meetings with local community department staff. Community meetings 1 will be held in San Leandro, Castro Valley and Dublin/Pleasanton concurrent with key project milestones. These will include initial scoping meetings, mid-project meetings to review project alternatives, and hearings on the Draft EIR. A newsletter will be distributed periodically which will help, inform interested parties of refinements in the project description and progress with the environmental review. -I-n addition, BART will provide ongoing coordination with the Valley-wide Citizens Advisory Committee, a volunteer committee comprised of members from the Valley Chambers of Commerce and other groups as required. A Rail Advisory Committee for the study has been established to serve as an advisory group to the BART Board of Directors. This committee is comprised of elected officials from each of the cities of Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton, the Alameda County Supervisor representing Castro Valley, _ the Alameda County Supervisor representing the Livermore-Amador Valley, and the BART Director from the 5th BART District. This committee will meet at key times during the course of the study. Completion of the environmental review is scheduled for December of 1989. Preliminary engineering and refinement of the operations plan for the DPX will take place concurrently with environmental review for the project and will extend to March of 1990:' BART will pursue agreements with local agencies and Caltrans/FHWA for project development through January of 1991. Right-of-way acquisition will begin in 1990 and extend to 1992. Final engineering design will begin in 1990 and extend through 1993. Actual construction is estimated to take place over a 5-year period (1990- 1995) with testing and start-up projected for 1995. 3.0 BACKGROUND — The proposed project is the result of 18 years of planning and community coordination. Table 1 identifies the chronology of planning studies and agency actions since 1971 leading to the selection of BART as 2 the preferred transit alternative in the study corridor, and to the alignment and station locations adopted by the BART Board of Directors in December of 1987. Measure B passed by Alameda County in November of 1986 provided funding necessary to implement the project. The proposed station locations and preliminary operations plan were derived from population growth and initial ridership projections A-n the study corridor to the year 2005 horizon. This corresponds with the horizon year for the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) forecasts of population, employment, and housing, for the San Francisco Bay Area. Ridership projections represent the projected tenth year of operation of the proposed extension, scheduled to start service in the year 1995. Criteria identified in the 1976 Livermore-Pleasanton Extension Study for planning the alignment and stations included: • Minimize BART construction and operating costs. • Maximize BART usage at a given population level . • Minimize total direct travel costs. • Avoid change in developed residential neighborhoods. • Minimize business and residential displacement. • Maximize environmental compatibility by using existing transportation corridor. -a • Minimize inequities created by a BART extension. • Preserve maximum open space. • Minimize valley population growth, while not restraining growth. • Maximize economic development of existing centers in the valley. • Maximize economic development at point of connection to existing BART line. • Minimize local government costs. • Maximize compatibility with existing General Plans. • Maximize compatibility with existing BART system and with other potential transit extensions. 3 4.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed rail alignment is within existing rail and roadway corridors along most of its route. The proposed alignment would start at the existing BART Bay Fair Station in San Leandro and travel southward to Interstate 238, turn eastward and follow--t-238 to its junction with - Interstate 580, and then continue eastward-'in the median of Interstate 580 through Dublin Canyon to the Dublin/Pleasanton area. The proposed project includes: • Route alignment design options • Passenger stations in Castro Valley, West Dublin/Pleasanton and an alternative station in East Dublin/Pleasanton • A tail track and track turnouts • A maintenance facility • Utility service and substations • Possible Joint Development scenarios at station sites • An interim park/ride facility at_the West Dublin/Pleasanton — Station site • Possible interface with other transit and roadway projects Impacts will be analyzed as they relate eo the construction and operation of the project and to various phasing and operating scenarios for service levels in the years 1995, 2000, and 2005._ Scheduling and cumulative impacts of the proposed BART extension with other projects and plans in the area, including highway and local road improvements proposed by Caltrans and individual communities, will also be addressed in the EIR. Major development plans around planned stations-rill be considered in the EIR as _ a part of the cumulative impact analysis. Separate environmental documents are being prepared by Caltrans for proposed highway projects. 4 4.1 Proposed Alignment Preliminary engineering designs are being developed for the alignment for the route between Bay Fair and Dublin/Pleasanton. Each design option will be assessed in the EIR. For clarity of presentation, the alignment has been divided into segments and lettered in sequence from west to east. These segments are identified on F-igure 2. Table 2 describes the - design and location options and station plans being considered for each segment. Segment A: Fremont Line-Dublin/Pleasanton Line Junction at Existing Bay Fair Station. Segment A extends from the:Bay Fair Station southeasterly to Elgin Street and contains the proposed track connections between the DPX and the existing Fremont Line. A configuration of braided, separated tracks, with turnouts connecting into the present two-track line leading to _ Bay Fair, is proposed to accommodate design options for transfer service at Bay Fair as well as "through" service. Both at-grade and elevated design options are being considered. The existing "pocket" or storage track (third track) just south of Bay Fair would be utilized as a lead for the DPX. The southerly stub end of the track would be connected to the existing Fremont main lines, thereby allowing access to and from the south. A"replacement storage track would also be constructed. Segment B: I-238 Corridor from Lynn Court to I-580 (Castro Valley) . The BART alignment and profile options through the I-238 interchange have been designed to be compatible with I-238' s existing narrow configuration as well as to accommodate possible future wi*ning of the highway by _ Caltrans. Within Segment B, BART may run on either the north or south side of existing I-238. In both the southern and northern design options, BART would run on an aerial structure in order to cross the I-238 ramps at Mission Boulevard. 5 The southern design option would require a subway or aerial structure to cross I-238 west of Mission Boulevard. The northern design option may require the acquisition of right-of-way that would not otherwise be necessary for the reconstruction of I-238. In either case, extensive use must be made of aerial or subway construction in order to be compatible with both existing and future highway characteristics in this corridor - segment. BART is coordinating with Caltrans engineering on design options for this segment to ensure that BART designs would not preclude future highway modification while still allowing BART to proceed with the extension project on schedule. Segment C: I-580 Corridor from I-238 (Castro Valley) to Foothill Road (Dublin/Pleasanton) . East of the East 14th Street overcrossing, BART would reach the same grade as the I-238 freeway and would continue in the 80- foot-wide freeway median at-grade through Dublin Canyon to Foothill Road with aerial sections at stream and road crossings. The entire I-580 segment is designed by Caltrans to allow 80 mph operation with a horizontal curvature of 3040 feet and a maximum 3.4 percent grade. Major portions of - I-580 have been completed, while other portions are still under construction. Segment D: I-580 Corridor from Foothill-'itoad to East of I-680. This segment contains two design options, both within the same general alignment along I-580. Differences are associated with the placement of the BART tracks relative to the freeway lanes. Similar to the I-238 interchange, close coordination between BART engineers and Caltrans is required for this segment to maximize future design flexibility for freeway modifications while maintaining BART' s schedule. Also. included in this segment would be a tail track option for BART. D-1: Median/At-Grade Design Option. ''The existing freeway median from west of Foothill Road to several hundred feet east of Foothill Road is 80 feet wide. This median width is adequate to accommodate BART without 6 modification to the travel lanes. Further east of Foothill Road, the existing I-580 would need to be widened to allow the BART station and tail track to fit at-grade in the median. The proposed 'Test Dublin/Pleasanton Station would be located in the median between Foothill Road and I-680, connected to parking areas on either side of I-580 by pedestrian overpasses. D-2: Median/Aerial Design Option. For this option BART would run in the existing I-580 median on an aerial structure between Foothill Road and the I-580/I-680 Interchange. Consideration will be given in the EIR to the possibility of future direct freeway flyover ramps from southbound I-680 to eastbound I-580 and from northbound I-680-to westbound I-580. For this option the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station would be located on an aerial structure in the I-580 median with provision for parking on both sides of the freeway. Crossover, turnback, and storage tracks would be located west of the station. 4.2 Alignment Extension for the Third Station Alternative - Segment E: I-580 Corridor from East of I-680 to the Location of the East Dublin/Pleasanton Station Alternative. Within this segment, BART would continue to be in the existing I-580 median at-grade. This would require widening the freeway by one lane either t6 the north or south. Design options at the Hopyard Road Interchange will be assessed for this segment .including possible freeway widening. Segment F: I-580 Corridor from the East Dublin/Pleasanton Station Alternative to End of Tail Tracks. BART would continue to run at-grade in the median of I-580 in this segment. The-_f-reeway would be widened on _ either one or both sides of I-580 to accommodate BART tracks. 4.3 Proposed Stations •`__ Two stations are proposed for the DPX project: one in Castro Valley and one in West Dublin/Pleasanton. A third station alternative in East 7 Dublin/Pleasanton is being considered by BART as the terminus for the extension in response to potential parking and traffic issues related to projected ridership forecasts. Previously completed patronage studies were used to develop conceptual designs and parking requirements for each of the station locations. The 1987 patronage projections will be re-evaluated and revised as necessary to determine right-of-way and acquisition needs and parking requirements for each station site. Conceptual designs, including station access routes, surface parking or parking structure, and required acres for each station will be refined during concurrent preliminary engineering through consultation with local jurisdictions. An interim park/ride facility and design options of an at-grade or elevated station will be assessed for the West Dublin/Plea-santon Station location. Joint development scenarios at proposed station sites will also be addressed to include potential joint use of BART property for retail , office, and commercial services. Castro Valley Station. The Castro Valley Station site is located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Redwood Road and Norbridge _ Avenue. This site was adopted subsequent to a detailed evaluation of alternatives by BART and Alameda County staff as well as extensive public review. The conceptual station plan identified that an estimated 12 acres would be needed for the station and parking; 9.7 acres of the Castro Valley site is currently owned by BART. Previous studies projected about 6320 daily one-way passengers to or from the Castro Valley Station by year 2005. This patronage estimate is lower than other stations considered, and reflects the resident population within walking distance of the station and the relatively high percentage of transit use anticipated at the station. Based on this initial projection, a need for about 1000 parking spaces by year 2005 was identified. .Z 8 West Dublin/Pleasanton Station. The proposed West Dublin/Pleasanton Station would be located in the I-580 median between Foothill Road and I-680. Parking areas would be both the north and south sides of the freeway in the cities of Dublin and Pleasanton. Pedestrian access from the parking and transit loading areas to the station would be via a pedestrian bridge over I-580. —_ In initial studies, the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station was projected to attract about 18,090 daily one-way passenger trips to or from the station by year 2005. These projections assume that the bulk of the southerly San Ramon Valley corridor BART trips would use the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station. With development of the San Ramon Valley corridor transit service to a transfer station at the East Dublin/Pleasanton Station site to the east, some of the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station ridership would shift to the other station. The initial studies indicated the need for 3400 parking spaces by the year 2005 if this station serves as the DPX terminus. BART has acquired a _ total of 16 acres at this site, 7 acres in Dublin, and 9 acres in Pleasanton, for the proposed Dublin/Pleasanton Park/Ride Project. This interim facility was planned to accommodate 1400 parking spaces. The additional 2000 or more parking spaces regpuired for the station would have to be accommodated. If the third station alternative is implemented, the parking requirement for the West Dublin/Pleasanton Station is estimated to be 1300 spaces. 4.4 East Dublin/Pleasanton Station Alternative The alternative East Dublin/Pleasanton Station would be located in the I-580 median between the Hopyard Road interchange and the future Hacienda Drive interchange. The conceptual station layout has been designed to accommodate transfers between BART and a possible transit system for the • San Ramon Valley along the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The conceptual layout utilizes the railroad undercrossing for pedestrian access to the station platform. 9 Earlier studies showed that the East Dublin/Pleasanton Station was projected to attract 12,010 daily trips to or from the station. It is estimated that up to 2500 parking spaces would be needed by year 2005. This does not include possible park-and-ride demand for San Ramon Valley corridor transit service should this also.-serve the station. A total of 30 acres accommodating 3000 parking spaces, has been previously identified for the BART station. This would accommodate the projected 2500 space demand projected for BART users, plus an additional 500 spaces which may be required at this 'site to accommodate the San Ramon Valley transit system. 4.5 Yard And Maintenance Facilities - A 350-foot maintenance space would be constructed to the east of the terminus station within the turnback track area. The maintenance facility would include a 25-foot by 50-foot storage structure, with access from adjacent local streets. Two maintenance-of-way access points would also be — constructed along the alignment. 4.6 DPX Operational Plan The planned extension would be desigrfbd to operate as through service. BART will develop operating scenarios for the two-station extension and the third station alternative for the years 1995, 2000, and 2005, in conjunction with the results of revised patronage projections. 10 AVAILABILITY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION Copies of the following reports and documents are available upon request from BART. 1. Livermore/Amador Valley Rail Alter-natives Study, Final Report, - December, 1987. - 2. BART Livermore-Pleasanton Extension Study Supplemental Analysis, Final Report, February, 1986. 3. BART Livermore-Pleasanton Extension Study Update Analysis, Final Report, December, 1983. 4. Livermore-Pleasanton BART Extension Study, Final Report, July, 1976. 5. BART Negative Declaration for the Proposed Dublin/Pleasanton Park/ — Ride Project, March, 1987. 6. BART Board of Directors Policy on a Preferred Route Alignment for a Livermore-Pleasanton Extension, Afril 10, 1986. 7. BART Joint Development Implementation Policy and Program Information. 8. Resolutions of the 1) Policy Liaison Committee of the Livermore/ Amador Valley Rail Alternatives Study (November 4, 1987) ; 2) the Livermore/Amador Valley Transit Authority Board of Directors (December 7, 1987) ; and 3) the BART Board of Directors on "Adopting a Mode and Implementation Schedule for the Dublin Canyon Rail � . Extension (December 17, 1987) . 11 Table 1. CHRONOLOGY OF PLEASANTON/DUBLIN/LIVERMORE EXTENSION STUDIES October 1971 Livermore-Amador Valley Transportation Needs Study is completed. Study recommended three types of bus services: - Express buses to BART rail line - Local bus routes - Subscription bus service to Lawrence Radiation Laboratory and. Sandia Corporation - September 1971 Livermore-Pleasanton BART -Extension Project and Board of Control is created. June 1972 Consultant team of Livingston and Blayney, DeLeuw, Cather & Company and associated firms is selected, and work begins on study. August 1972 Citizens Advisory Committee for extension project is _ created. October 1972 Issues report is published. December 1972 Data report is published. January 1973 Regional Transit Travel Projections Project/Task I patronage forecasts are completed. February 1973 Telephone survey of 400 households is conducted. - March 1973 Evaluation Criteria report is published. March 1973 Preliminary Alternatives report is published. April 1973 Alternatives are reduced-rrom 6 lines in 2 corridors to 3 Valley lines and 2 corridors by Project Board of Control . January 1974 Final Alternatives report is published and public meetings _ held in Livermore, Pleasanton, Castro Valley, and Danville. February 1974 Regional Transit Travel Projections Project/Task III patronage forecasts are completed. March 1974 Project Board of Control _selects route and stations for _ BART extension to Livermore. August 1974 Patronage forecasts for Bus Alternative are completed. November 1974 Implementation program is completed. March 1975 Draft Final Report and draft Summary are published and public meetings are held. Table 1. CHRONOLOGY OF PLEASANTON/DUBLIN/LIVERMORE EXTENSION STUDIES (concluded) July 1976 Livermore-Pleasanton BART Extension Study Final Report issued. December 1983 BART Livermore-Pleasanton Extension Study Update Analysis Final Report issued. February 1986 BART Livermore-Pleasanton,-Extension Study Supplemental - Analysis Final Report issued. April 1986 BART Board of Directors Policy issued on a Preferred Route Alignment for a Livermore-Pleasanton Extension. November 1986 Alameda County Measure B. , March 1987 BART Negative Declaration for the Proposed Dublin- _ Pleasanton Park/Ride Project issued. November 1987 Resolution issued of the Policy Liaison Committee of the Livermore/Amador Valley Rail Alternatives Study. - December 1987 Livermore/Amador Valley Rail Alternatives Study Final Report issued. December 1987 Resolution issued of the Livermore/Amador Valley Transit Authority Board of Directors. - December 1987 Resolution issued of the BART Board of Directors on "Adopting a Mode and Implementation Schedule for the Dublin Canyon Rail Extension." Table 2. PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES Segment Proposed Alignment Alignment Design Option Proposed Station Station Alternative A. Fremont Line-Dublin/ • Through service and transfer Pleasanton Junction service at Bay Fair • Connect DPX tracks 3 and 4 • Use existing storage track as lead for DPX • Construct replacement storage track • Add auxiliary track north of Bay Fair Station for turnback movement B. 1-238 corridor from • Cross 1-238 ramps on aerial Lynn Court to 1-580 structure at Mission Blvd. • Run south of 1-238 - Cross Run north of 1-238 -238 welt of Mission Blvd. i) subway aerial structure C. 1-580 corridor from • BART at-grade in 1-580 median Casio Valley Station: North- • Joint' Development at station 1-238 to Foothill through Dublin Canyon west quadrant of Redwood Road site Road dnd Norbridryu Avenue D. 1-580 corridor from • BAK at grade in 1-580 median • BART on aerial structure in West Dublin/Pleasanton • West Dublin/Pleasanton Sty .,)n: Foothill Road to east of Foothill Road 1-580 median between Foothill Station: at-grade located in elevated East of 1-680 • Widen 1-580 where median is • Crossover, turnback and 1-580 median between Foothill • Interim Park/Ride Facility less than 80 feet ' storage tracks west of Road and 1-680; pedestrian • Joint Development at station station overpass. Parking in Dublin site and Pleasanton. Table 2. PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES (concluded) Segment Proposed Alignment Alignment Design Option Proposed Station Station Alternative E. 1-580 from East of • BART at-grade in 1-580 median East Dublin/Pleasanton Station Joint development at 1-680 to San Ramon • Widen freeway one lane located in 1-580 median station site Transit Corridor • Widen Hopyard Road Interchange between Hopyard Road and Hacienda Drive interchange F. 1-580 Corridor from • BART at-grade in 1-580 median San Ramon Transit • Widen Freeway for BART Corridor to end • Relocate frontage roads of Tail Tracks , � ` , �.� � 1 4t•, kt r -,l,l.rd,e• Walnut Creek erkell f Emarrak1.. '� I! ,�';rl•f �- \,`t,.,:. r s .. :7 --� '• w.-,...-. {{//11 �'.. Gl..'4 :, ,Y' �' j-�,�— �'-�';;:W `• •�� ... EIS' �. �.��. •.�.. � - •,� 1 ,:� di ..-1•_�•' 1.,�_— ' ,.�'. :fir 1��4.�- ..;.. ��1 4._, ... � ~ -����..` ^,`'• t �_�.��•\��� '�e, \ .. 1�..�';:�. (�~•.• ..... ,y,,e1 - is• !! ,r•:' ,. r _ 'i ' Ir lrwr 1; `5 � ! ..... �. `' � '� + 1` `, y �•.. �,._ 5....~�I �\'annnnre ... LEGEND ✓:. .. �\` s .:l. ._ Q Proposed station locations a e•ItMw 0 , rF 0 1 2 3 4 5 miles at Win" .� \. Figure 1. REGIONAL LOCATION MAP J '0A P , /l 3, N6• ITT., !1,�, t 1. x s Wk NO, 'x jy;, 'IT -4QQ P r,• IV, Gl � 4 R L N, d Ag % "p 11 Y-11 ......... ... ILA 11 17 'T- tW ...... I- all IF 1 1 V, I Zx` x- —"Y V�l 4 Fl: d —:4 0 1/2 N, A —TT mil LEGEND Station Route segment Figure 2a. BART DUBLIN/PLEASANTON EXTENSION ROUTE A vl! -- I It -M— 0 -Sr u �ls,` ..I„t.i( 1 � la a ` �..'S 1 1- -; � c A,:.\�,} �i�\�<.- ;I- !� +'•'i' S(.c:b\�.,� �J• 5 -,�f ArtADpV�) .`, \ i, A N1 I, Sh n l4moii VV ji" i,M. ;_�'r•pam•/I4,'.�;:..;-\:.�.',"..t',1:t r�.:'./\\1:.c�%_1.,::.L~:,./n<�\'1.�.:,.-".;;.,,te�,.,.'_,_,,A f�`,f,�.'.\t 1"•rL.^,Vil.,'!1:r•�•L,L.'.•..t'::i\.t�J�s'i:\y�t�.a-_"\,�1 Jr.�s.+:�r...r„•.�\_:t1."..•-1•"'-.I y.^•�"m%I 1,.`,s'.-_i.\(�r,...�.�:•.r:t•..*.y".l•��,r y'._.�.,r�.r r.•I..`•�,:Y...."��'�',:.�I'dIte,:\-p1?_�f:":I•`•�.l/':_.��,..,`.1't i�NI y..'_,:r`''r.r,-K`.4\'C``�t�1•.�J.,�tj,'.��l Y}.^:;.:�s:',�a,„�:/�.".t II1.IZ I Ii,I 1 I'} gr 17 S, 4, Wk blamr.nn 2 d . ..... Win j All -V A tam 4 QI. W'. L NZ .........*. ...... x. 3 ZZ. "k, K "A-1 A "-z�-' ;,V �Z, 04 3*1. 0 " J; J -XV It. I V.AIWI� 4 17 00% 0Z -4 0 2 �g mile LEGEND Milepost Station Route segment Figure 2b. BART DUBLIN/PLEASANTON EXTENSION ROUTE 4- 411 -1;L Zoe 11. a .0 U Gels • M ■ • Y •■N •••• w M •• " •■ 5 N1 NOTICE OF uOMMUNITY SCOPING AND INFORnATION MEETING BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT DUBLIN/PLEASANTON EXTENSION What The Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) proposes to Is construct and operate a 12-mile extension of the system Proposed from the existing Bay Fair Station in San Leandro to the Dublin/Pleasanton area. The proposed extension would start at the existing Bay Fair Station and travel south to I-238 , turn eastward and follow I-.238 to its junction R�C ENV E D with I-580, and then continue eastward in the median of I-580 through Dublin Canyon to the Dublin/Pleasanton JAN 1 »$g area. The study will examine a new station at Castro Valley and a West Dublin/Pleasanton station. A project alternative will also consider an additional two-mile extension to an East Dublin/Pleasanton station. BART is currently beginning the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) , pursuant to the California Environ- mental Quality Act (CEQK) . What's The purpose of these scoping/information meetings is to Your get the public involved in the process at an early stage. Role Local residents, business owners and property owners are encouraged to participate. At the meeting , a descrip- tion of the proposed alternatives to be addressed in the EIR will be provided and citizens will be given a chance to suggest items that should be addressed in the EIR. - Where For your convenience, BART is holding these information And meetings at three separate locations throughout Alameda When County. The same general information will be presented at each meeting. The meetings will be held as follows : San Leandro Castro Valle? Community Library Ctr. Norbridge School Board Rm. 300 Estudillo Avenue 399 Norbridge Avenue San Leandro Castro Valley Monday, Jan. 30, 1989 - Wednesday, Feb 1 , 19oi 7:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. Dublin/Pleasanton Dublin High School Little Theatre 8151 Village Parkway T Dublin Thursday, Feb. 2, 1989 7:30 P.M. .; Contact If you have any questions or comments about the meetings or the BART Dublin/Pleasanton Extension Project or would like additional information , please call Marianne Payne at (415)464-6173 or Marianne Payne, Project Manager write: DPX Environmental Analysis Bay Area Rapid Transit District 800 Madison Avenue P.O. Box 12688 Oakland , CA 94604 SAN RAMON SAN b'$ LEANDRO CASTRO VALLEY p Proposed Alternative m West Dublin/ East Dublin/ Existing � Proposed Pleasanton ° 0`vd, v Camp Pleasanton Bayfair Castro Valley Station DUb�t^ �,o C Parks Station Station n Station F a 7 I Cd Y 9�4 1-580 O a 1580 e Blvd. DUBLIN S o °^ Sf 7 V = 1.238 ,r -0 �,v StoUaidge a Hacienda LIVERMORE r„ ,g a a Business 0 6i jOwo a a p Park fires Rd � d 9� a Stoneridge Dr. I HAYY�ARD PLEASANTON 1 � I i i �9 ■ p O A7 Not to Scale LEGEND Proposed Route ® Alternative Extension to Third Station at East Dublin/Pleasanton BART DUBLIN/PLEASANTON EXTENSION ROUTE [+ y ) gal •. �A r 7rd � T }wJ J a, •+• : tit: r 'y,r'ti .'.re r,.; .;, 'C 5`y;su` �`;P`"?rr = a., n'�."rct:: n1' `�al'. .�, ,. n +- ,fir•fr.> �r:t � 3 L-. I �. s s-. ' r .rrr ,{ r �' �w a ,✓ + ,..r•.>.e Yr � Y L�' Fx+ p¢'. r� � t, {, QQ �"�`r r<Y'..c.- -��.�{. aa��`��+ v 4:( 4 j.. r p! '�,,r r[a,F. tp S„4 :,f 1 ^is..n. �1 1• i4,y .r F r -rj d Y tV��, r � - N ,s•- SM rr ,r + i -,'t w i r f F ! rr.`t t i•, t#et ,{ .Y-a f?v -<':rt... ^.:: #.hit.:.'�= t a,'7 i ^ ,�' t ' yrt NOTICE OF PDBLIC AGEHCTSCOPING-MEETING> A �} .Yj .i. t'r• .,: .r '' c• t 3 t 4-.{c 'r b . 4 BAT 'AREA RAPID TRAKSIT�DLSTxICT 3; , r DUBLIN/PLEASANTON EZTEHSION Study _-The ,Bay Area Rapid,Tr.ansit;;District ,(BART) ,;proposes ;to - . Descrip- `,:construct:and •:operate; a',12=mile=exte'nsioa':'of f`the.;system tion -..from. the existing Bay .Fair.,-'Statiori: in'-Sane-Leandro to -the ..Dublin/Pleasanton :area. -The ' proposed ':exteasion would -start at'-lie ;exist-ing Bayf Fair,Station;and 'travel 1 south to .I.`238 turn eastward 'and -'follow I-238 to Its -rjunction 'with '-1 ' 580 and -then con tiaue`:eastward -in. the .:.median-.of I-580 through :Dublin Cafiyon 'to the -.Dublin/ Pleasanton area::; The study" will examine a- new station at Castro. -and a:.West`'Dublin/Pleasinton ' station. . A project alternative •will"'also 'consider-.an additional two-mile extension to 'an East Dublin%Pleasanton- Station. BART -is currently beginning the preparation .-.of -an_ Envir- onmental. Impact Report (EIR) ,` pursuant ..to` .the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) r Purpose/ The public agency scoping meeting will be held for the Goals purpose of describing the project alternatives to be Of addressed in the EIR and to receive comments from public Scoping agencies about items to be addressed in the EIR. This Meeting early agency consultation is being held in addition to the formal CEQA noticing procedures. Dates The meeting will be held- as _follows: � - And Times _ BART " Board Room, lot Floor 800 Madison. Street Oakland, CA Friday, January 279 1989 . 2:00 P.M. The date - for receipt of- written 'comments in -response to the Notice 'Of Preparatioa is February 13,­ 1989 - Contact If. you :have any ^;questions •'or .-comments .about the meetings or ' the BART Dublin/Pleasanton Extension Project or would - -:=_4- like additional information, :.please '_call' Marianne Payne at (415)464-6173 .'or •write to:'; Marianne Payne; ProjectManager ; DP% Environmental Analysis Bay 'Area 'RapidrTraasit District`r d 800 Madis'ohi iY t rK-gia.v Yii. r i Pr.FO. Boxj`'12688 ? k n c `? k t 1 - � �} ri} t' ir�J�+ •+'a• -_}' rr0akland�A;s.IA�t°74604-`xi�,u "✓' �'' �.� ` c• �!� '•a t #+, � t ; -; � i s E -.`} 1 t F i s - Yi re'•} k r M.r 5r 5 S 4 J a ?:. '� is- .x V.r'r :"V 3`t q Y ,tr 4rt t�4�' c c '•t �+� �!Y. :•y ti - r ,sr y r t3k •i 4th% 5�y�r2`3.1 x+ t� 'C r?.• ti t1r x j l' { u .s i .•�` •.+ i .:; 1.1 di ,i+. ;,. ,F ° �'� a � 1r � Lit}K Lv � x°Y+ `y,.- FN�r �"