HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.5 Circulate Proposals Telcom Paging System 00-30
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 23, 1989
SUBJECT Authorization to Circulate Proposals for
Telecommunications System and Telephone/Data
Cabling and Paging System
Report by Paul S. Rankin, Assistant City Manager
EXHIBITS ATTACHED o Executive Summary and Selected Excerpts from Design
Criteria Study
o Telecommunications RFP
o Cabling/Paging System RFP
RECOMMENDATION Approve the RFP' s and authorize Staff to circulate
them among providers. Also, waive formal bidding
requirements and authorize Staff to negotiate a system
package for approval by the City Council.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The following estimates are based on pricing submitted
by vendors and the Consultants bidding of similar
systems :
Estimated Phone System & Cabling $75, 000-90, 000
Voice Messaging Option $15, 000-$25, 000
Funds are included in the Civic Center project budget,
to provide for the purchase of a phone system.
DESCRIPTION The City of Dublin currently leases phone equipment
for City Offices from AT&T. The City owns the phones used at other
locations (Shannon Center, Senior Center, Corporation Yard) . In August of
1988, the City Council approved a Consultant's agreement with CSD to prepare
a review of the City' s telephone needs.
The first phase of the Consultant' s work was to review our existing system
and develop criteria which can be used in a Request For Proposal (RFP) . The
Consultant also obtained budgetary price information from several vendors.
Current System
The City' s current system has several deficiencies which impact the
organization. The system is extremely basic and does not include features
which many systems now consider standard. The Consultant prepared a flow
chart which compares the current system to the proposed system.
One limitation of the current system is the fact that if a caller reaches
the wrong office, it may be impossible to transfer the call. This can only
be done if the office which the caller meant to call has the line in their
office. For example, the Planning Department only has the first line of the
City Manager' s Office on their phones. If call comes in on the City
Manager' s second line and they want the Planning Department, the caller must
hang up and redial.
The current system also has limitations on the ability to determine whether
a phone is being used. If a Secretary in Development Services has a call
for a staff member, they must use the Com Line to announce the call .
However, the current phone system does not have the ability to alert the
Secretary as to whether the staff person is already on another call . This
can cause delays and unnecessary interruptions.
The current system also provides only one Com Line for the entire
organization. This is an internal line which allows a caller to reach
another station within the building. If someone in Planning is speaking
with someone in the City Manager' s Office, the line cannot be used for any
other purpose. This means that calls received by Development Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO:
Glenn Rudh, CSD
ITEM N0.
.cannot be announced over the phone until the Com Line is clear. The fact
that the Civic Center facility is spread out will cause a greater impact
than our current office layout.
The long-term cost of leasing phones is also a concern. Given that the
pricing of most electronic/computer systems has been reduced in. the past
five years, the City may find that it is cost effective to own the
equipment. Most organizations have found that this approach is beneficial.
Proposed System
The RFP' s are designed to provide the opportunity for the City to review two
types of systems.
o Centrex
The RFP for a telecommunications system specifically acknowledges that the
City is interested in receiving a proposal from Pacific Bell, for "Centrex"
service. This system operates from Pac Bell's Office. The City would only
have phone instruments and not the actual switching device in the City
facility. Pacific Bell offers this service for a monthly fee. The review
of their proposal will attempt to compare costs over time.
It is also important to understand that the City will be requesting that
Pacific Bell submit a complete proposal including the phone instruments and
the Voice Messaging option. Since the break up of the phone companies,
there has been some reluctance by local , utilities to also recommend specific
equipment. The Consultant has recommended that Pacific Bell consider a
joint bid with equipment suppliers . If specific written authorization from
the City is required by Pacific Bell, Staff will provide the necessary
document.
o In-House System
The second option which will be evaluated is a completely "in-house" system.
The City would purchase the switching equipment and the telephone
instruments . There are a variety of vendors and systems which may meet our
needs .
The Consultant has reviewed the plans for the building and determined that
at the time of installation, 102 station lines will need to be provided.
They will be wiring 136 which will add additional flexibility within the
finished portions of the facility. The Consultant believes that in order to
accommodate growth, the system .needs to support 230 lines. The RFP does not
address the purchase of any equipment for the expansion space. However, the
main system will be sized to accommodate this growth in the future. The
actual number of locations which will have phones at the time of
installation is approximately 160 . This includes all work rooms, conference
rooms, and offices which are anticipated to be in use in the near term.
The City would purchase a block of numbers from Pacific Bell. This would
also occur with a Centrex arrangement. This allows each station to have a
unique number. This will allow internal calls to be placed between any two
stations using an abbreviated number. The individual numbers eliminate the
current problem with a single Com Line to conduct internal conversations .
The City would continue to group numbers within a department and in most
cases, the calls would initially be answered by the Department Secretary.
Staff members who work after regular buisness hours could be reached at
their direct number if the calling party was aware of the number.
The proposed design does not include a central switchboard. Staff believes
that this arrangement complicates the ability for a caller to reach a
particular department. The building program provides space for an
information/cashier position. This location can also act as an answering
point for a number which will be listed as General Information. When this
location is not staffed, the calls can be received in the City Manager" s
Office. The proposed system will allow the call to be transferred to any
location within the City Offices or Police facility.
Costs
The Consultant has obtained budgetary pricing prior to the complete
development of the system features . These are considered to be estimates
which probably reflect list pricing. It is anticipated that the RFP process
-2-
will generate a more competitive bidding environment and that the pricing
should differ from those shown in the requests for budgetary pricing. The
Consultant has also recently completed bids for other clients and they
anticipate the cost of a complete system with cabling to be $75, 000-$90, 000.
Voice Messaging
The Consultant has also reviewed the possible inclusion of a voice messaging
systems. This will be included as an option which the City can either add
or delete at the time that a vendor is selected.
Voice Messaging (VM) operates on the same principle as an answering machine.
However, the equipment is sophisticated and allows several individuals to
have a personal "mailbox" on the system. The primary limitations of the
system are the amount of storage available and the number of users which can
use the system simultaneously. The RFP requests pricing on a system which
would allow 4 users (ports) at the same time and 6 hours of storage. The
system needs to be capable of expanding to 8 users and 16 hours of storage.
Staff expressed the need for the Consultant to design a system which does
not automatically result in the caller receiving the VM system. Given the
public service nature of City operations, it was considered important to
have the call answered initially- by a Staff person.
A VM system can provide many benefits for the organization. With a recorded
message, the caller can leave as much information as possible. This can
improve the ability of Staff to efficiently respond to messages . This would
relate to messages from Staff members as well as members of the public. The
use of an automated messaging system can also reduce the amount of time
secretaries and receptionists spend taking messages . It is anticipated that
the caller would be given the option to leave the message on the messaging
system. All phones in offices will be equipped with message lights, which
would indicate a need to check their message number.
The VM system would also provide the ability to forward primary numbers to a
general recording during non-business hours. This recording could explain
who to call in the event of an emergency ,such as traffice signals not
working, clogged storm drains, etc. The system would also be valuable to
police investigations personnel who may need to receive messages after
hours . Overall, the proposed system would provide a great benefit and would
result in more efficient handling of telephone messaging.
Call Accounting (Optional Item)
The Consultant is also requesting information on call accounting systems .
This system would collect data on the calls made from each extension. The
system could also provide cost information and a variety of reports . The
system would allow information on calling costs to be collected by
department.
At this time, it is not anticipated that this feature would be a high
priority. Upon receipt of the RFP' s, Staff will review the costs and make a
recommendation to the City Council . The estimates in the budgetary pricing
indicated that the costs range from $5, 200 to $30, 000 . Again, the RFP
process should provide more competitive pricing.
Cabling & Paging System
The cabling has been prepared as a separate RFP. Typically, firms
specialize in this area and this eliminates the additional mark-up which
would be added if the phone system company provided the bid.
The proposed cable specifications are intended to address wiring for the
phone system as well as wiring for data processing. The Consultant is
continuing to work with the IBM representative on cost efficient options for
the data processing wiring.
The cabling provider is also being requested to provide a basic paging
system for the Police facility. This is intended to be used in the event
that police personnel are needed at the front counter. In most cases, the
patrol personnel are not within a specific office and an overhead speaker in
open areas is required. The Consultant has advised that this scope of work
would be best paired with the cabling vendor. The paging system will be
accessed by the telephone selected.
-3-
Call Patterns and Costs
In addition to designing a phone system, the Consultant has also analyzed
call activity and cost comparisons for alternative long distance service.
The call activity showed that the majority of the calls occurred mid-morning
and mid-afternoon. This is considered typical of a business operation. The
Consultant also reviewed the amount of "Trunk Traffic" to determine the
number of main trunk lines which would need to be provided by the utility.
The study showed that 9 trunks would provide adequate capacity for future
growth.
The Consultant also reviewed one month of phone bills to determine the
destination of most calls . The study showed that 66.1% of the calls were
local calls . This would include those calls which are made to Pleasanton,
Livermore, San Ramon, Danville, etc. An additional 28.9% of the calls
placed, although they were not considered local calls, were made to
locations within the Greater Bay Area. For example, a call to San Francisco
would fall into this category. This includes calls to .numbers within the
following area codes : 415, 408, and 707 . Therefore, this analysis shows
that the total percentage of calls which are made to locations within the
Bay Area is 95% of the calls placed.
The high volume of calls within the Bay Area resulted in the Consultant's
recommendation that the City continue to use AT&T as the long distance
carrier. This was justified further by the cost comparison of alternative
service. In preparing the comparison, the Consultant included all monthly
fees and service charges to develop a cost per minute. The Consultant has
also indicated that AT&T has maintained competitive rates for long distance
calls within California. The analysis showed that the majority of: the calls
were within California.
Conclusion
The Consultant will be in attendance at the meeting to answer any questions .
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the circulation of the
Request for Proposals . Further, the City Council is requested to waive the
formal bidding requirements based on technical nature of the systems to be
purchased. Staff will review the RFP responses, negotiate a system price
and submit a final recommendation for City Council approval.
-4-
i
EXECUTIVE SUMNIARY
AND
EXCERPTS FROM DESIGN CRITERIA STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CSD was retained by the City of Dublin on August 8, 1988, to assist in
determining the City's overall communications requirements for the new Civic
Center complex. CSD's design activities have concentrated on increasing the
level of service to the public, as well as providing a system design which will
meet the long-term needs of a municipality with a significant rate of growth.
CSD has performed the following activities: .
1. CSD requested information regarding the City's services from your present
suppliers--Pacific Bell and AT&T.
2. CSD has obtained copies of the City's billings for usage for purposes of
performing an analysis to determine the proper configuration of outside
trunk lines and types of services.
3. City employees have provided CSD with stroke tallies of incoming calls to
determine the quantity of calls each department receives during one (1)
business week.
4. CSD has provided a user questionnaire which was completed by all City
personnel to determine user preferences for the new system.
5. Interviews were conducted with department heads and clerical personnel to
determine the preferred method of operation for each department.
6. A Request For Quotation was sent to all interested suppliers of
telecommunications equipment and services to obtain budgetary price figures
.for new properly designed telecommunications equipment.
Through the course of the above activities, CSD has uncovered the following
considerations for new telephone services for the City of Dublin:
1. The City's new facilities will require the use of one telephone system for
the Civic Center, as compared to the present configuration of separate key
systems. The present systems will not allow for the transfer of calls
between City departments unless the lines appear on the other department's
telephones. There is presently only one (1) intercom channel connecting
the City Hall offices.
2. Each City department has separate listed telephone numbers for receiving
calls. While this method is preferred for the new system design, there
is currently no capability to transfer misdirected calls to another
department or to a central "switchboard" for assistance.
3. The City will continue to grow at an accelerated pace in the future, and
consideration of this must be reflected in the specifications for the
maximum capacity of the system selected. CSD has projected an annual
growth of approximately 10%, which will meet the total capacity of the new
building's design 'over a ten-year period. In addition, while there is
presently no desire to connect the facilities which are located away from
the main location to the telephone system, CSD has allowed for this to
be done in the future.
4. There is a regk ,ment to be able to contact Ci' ersonnel after normal
working hours, and to be able to leave a message for key personnel when
they are not available. The present method of receiving written messages
can result in unnecessary delays. CSD has included, as an option, the
feature of voice messaging. This would allow the transfer of calls to the
voice ,messaging system after a caller has spoken to a City employee. It
is preferred that no caller will be sent directly to the voice messaging
system without human intervention, however, this feature can be utilized
after normal business hours.
5. Due to the Police Department's status, there is a need to be able to
transfer an emergency call to the County Offices in San Leandro without
remaining on the line, and the capability of forwarding all emergency calls
after hours, if desired. In addition, the Police Department will require
the use of internal paging through overhead ceiling speakers, which will
be accessed through the telephone system.
6. The network study revealed a majority of local calls and calls placed to
locations within the San Francisco Service Area, or LATA. This area covers
all of the "415" and "707" area codes, as well as most of the "408" area
code. Due to the total volume of calls, there are no alternative types
of services available to the City of Dublin which would provide the City
with a cost savings.
The following material has been included for consideration by the City of Dublin:
1. The Design Criteria, which details the system capacities, features, and
capabilities. CSD recommends the use of Direct Inward Dialing (DID) , which
.will enable callers to City Offices to dial a unique seven-digit telephone
number for each individual, as well as providing the ability for every
call to be transferred to any other City department or location. Intra-
office calls may be placed by dialing the appropriate three-digit station
number.
2. A Voice Messaging Cost Justification, based on the responses from the
questionnaire.
3. Attachment "A" , which details the types and quantity of telephone
instruments required at each location.
4. Flow charts which detail the present flow of communications into City
offices, as well as the projected method, using DID and voice messaging.
5. A spreadsheet of the responses from the Request For Quotation, detailing
the response from each vendor.
6. A sample of the Decision Modeling Matrix which CSD will assist the City
of Dublin in determining the criteria and rules for basing a purchase
decision. Recommendations of possible criteria, rules, and associated
weights have been included in the sample. CSD requests City management
complete this matrix with the assistance of CSD. This information will
be included in the telephone system Request For Proposal (RFP) .
7. The results of the network study performed by CSD.
The analysis of the questionnaires and the results of the stroke tally have
previously been provided to the City of Dublin. The Design Criteria must be
approved by the City of Dublin prior to the completion of the system RFP.
Included separately are the RFP for the telephone system, and the bid
specification for the cable and paging system.
COMMUNICATION FLOW CHARTS
CITY OF DUBLIN
All Calls to City Departments
r
Does
Incoming Call the caller NO !Dgat
live enough
via separate information to departmental process call?
numbers
Yea
Should
the call be Yes The caller must
i referred to a hang up and
different dial another
department? number for
most dapts.
No
Place caller on
hold. and use
intercom (If
available) to
announce call
Caller may
have to
wait if
intercom is
busy.
Announce Call
Is the
Take Message or No person Yea
rater to another available to Call Answered
person receive
call?
CITY OF DUBLIN
All Calls to City Departments Using Direct Inward Dialing and Optional Voice Messaging
ell D
Does
Incoming Call the caller No Put caller
give enough on hold. or
to Main information to gat
Number or process call? information
D.I.O. Number
Yea
INCOMING CALL Does the Yea Transfer call
BYPASSING TIE call require to another
CONSOLE transfer to a answer point
DIRECT TO different in City
DEPARTMENT dept? facilities
No
Ring Station of
call coverage
Yes person (or
Does the call secretary).
require DID call
screening? programmed to
ring at call
coverage
location.
No
Is the
Yes person
Answer Call available to Announce Call
receive
call?
No
Mae sage can be Is the
Man by No parson Yea
secretary. available to Call Answered
or...... receive
call?
i
Caller has
...caller option to
can be leave message Voice Nail
directed or to be System will
to Voice transferred to provide reports
Nail another of system
System person usage.
Item 4.5 Exhibit Missing
Telecommunications RFP
Item 4.5 Exhibit Missing
Cabling/Paging RFP
REQUEST FOR QUOTATION
BUDGETARY PRICING
CITY OF DUBLIN
BUDGETARY PRICE QUOTATIONS
VOICE
SWITCHING BURG. VOICE BUDG. TELEPHONE BUDG. INSTALL. L DATA ROOM PRICE PER
C01TANY SYSTEM PRICE MAIL PRICE ACCOU11TI14G PRICE INTERVAL INTEGR. ENVIRON. CABLE
API NEC Neax $67,563 Genesis $26,893 Summa IV $5,200 6 Weeks Yes 10'x10' $150
2400 SIM Cindi II Maxx 700
AEI Music Not Applicable
ATLT No Response Received
Centel Communications No Response Received
Executone N.T. $97,255 Meridian $24,486 Sykes Con $2,264 6-7 Weeks Yes No Quote San Bruno
SL-1ST Mail Tracks + P.C.
Fujitsu Fujitsu $40,000 Genesis $11,666 No Quote No Quote 90 Days Yes 40-86 F $115
Focus 960 Cindi 840B 6'X 9'
GTEL NEC Neax $90,812 Genesis $26,383 Stryker $19,402 90-120 Yes 8'X10' $75
2400 IMG Cindi 840C SSI-500 Days 60-80 F
IBM/ROLM IBM 9750 $118,616 IBM Phone $40,000 No Quote No Quote 90 Days Yes 8'X8' $190
Model 40 Mail
Infortext No Response
NEC NEC Neax $47,286 NEC Voice $20,587 Control $6,880 90 Days Yes 30 sq.ft. $44
2400 SIM Mail Key PL150 62-82 F
Octel No Response
Pacific Network No Response
Engineering
Pac Tel Toshiba $57,553 No Quote No Quote No Quote No Quote No Quote Yes No Quote $50
InfoSystems Perception
PacTel Meridian NTI Meridian $58,485 Meridian $15,841 XIOX $6,707 8 Weeks Yes 8'X8' $125
Mail SP + P.C. 59-85 F
Pacific Bell Centrex $1,305+ No Quote No Quote No Quote No Quote 5 Weeks Yes NIA Included
$1,898/mo.
RCA NEC Neax $102,130 Octel $44,995 Sigma IV $30,000 6 Weeks Yes 60-78F No Quote
2400 IMG MCX 7000
RCM Systems N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A NIA
September 19, 1988 Prepared by CSD, Inc. Page 1
CITY OF DUBLIN
BUDGETARY PRICE QUOTATIONS
VOICE
SWITCHING BUDG. VOICE BUDG. TELEPHONE BURG. INSTALL. S DATA ROOM PRICE PER
COMPPI7Y SYSTEM PRICE MAIL PRICE ACCOUNTING PRICE INTERVAL INTEGR. ENVIRON. CABLE
Standard Wire and No Response
Cable
Tel Plus Siemens $86,326 Octel $34,535 Siecom $7,860 45-60 Yes 7' X 10' $196
Saturn IIE Branch Target +. Days 41-104F
Twisted Pair No Response
Communications
UCS/Bell South NEC Neax $77,900 NEC VMM $16,800 Sumna IV $3,900 90 Days Yes 60-8OF No Quote
2400 IMG Maxx 700 + P.C.
US Telecenters No Response
Voice Pro SRX 1 $72,710 OPCOM $40,100 Control Key $7,500 4-8 Weeks Yes None No Quote
DIAL
Walnut No Response
Communications
XIOX No Response
XTEND Declined to Bid
Communications
Page 2
September 19, 1988 Prepared by CSD, Inc.
Call ABy H o u r
City of Dublin
Dublin, CA
15.0
13.5
12.0
10.5
9 .0
a & - " I .
7.5
o
t
6.0
4.5
3.0
3
AEE
1 .5 -
'
i
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
Time of Day
Analysis by
i
Communications Sales Dynumics, Inc.
Local Trunk Traffic
City of Dublin
Dublin, CA
150
135
120
105
0
90
75 -
cl)
60
45 - -- -
30
15 - -- -
01 77 --------
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Trunk Number
Analysis by
Communications Sales Dynamics, Inc.
CITY OF DUBLIN
SUMMARY OF LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE ALTERNATIVES
SERVICE TYPE TOTAL COST COST/MINUTE
Current AT&T Service $ 17080 .166
Allnet Maxcess 3 11138 .174
TDX "1+" WATS 1,140 .175
MCI Prism Plus 1,143 .175
US Sprint Dial "1" 1,128 .173
These monthly costs are reflected of the fact that the City of Dublin
currently places most of its calls to the surrounding local areas. The
costs are a combination of local and long distance calls.