The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.5 Kentucky Fried Chicken Sign Variance AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 8, 1987 SUBJECT: V-8422 Keith Holmes Sign Variance Appeal for Kentucky Fried Chicken. EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A - Resolution Upholding Zoning Administrator's Action Denying Variance Request Background Attachments: 1. Building Permit issued October 5, 1981 , 2. Letter dated December 21, 198l' -from Alameda `County Planning Department to Harman Management Corporation and Cal-Neon 3. Alameda County Variance Application 4. Alameda County Zoning Administrator Meeting Minutes of January 27, 1982 5. Resolution No. Z-4621 for V-8422 adopted March 3, 1982 6. Appeal Letter Cal-Neon dated March 10, 1982 7. Letter from Zoning Investigator dated April 30, 1987 8. Letter from Harman Kentucky-, Fried Chicken dated May 12, 11987 RECOMMENDATION: O� 1. Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2. Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3. Question Staff, Applicant, and the public. 4. Close public hearing and deliberate. 5. Adopt Resolution upholding Zoning Administrator's action denying Variance request, or give Staff direction and continue the item. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None. DESCRIPTION: Background: The existing 17 foot tall freestanding Kentucky Fried Chicken sign erroneously received Alameda County approval on September 30, 1981; a building permit was issued on October 5, 1981; and on December 21, 1981, the County Zoning Administrator notified the property owner and sign company that the freestanding sign was not in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. The notification indicated that in order to comply with the Ordinance, the Applicant would need to remove the 17 foot tall sign and apply for a low profile sign (maximum 6 foot height, and maximum 24 square foot sign area) , or relocate the sign beyond the required 30 foot frontyard setback area, or apply for a Variance to retain the sign. The Applicant subsequently applied for a Variance. On March 3, 1982, the Alameda County Zoning Administrator denied the Applicant's Variance request to allow the 17 foot tall freestanding sign within the front setback and not within the middle one-third of the lot. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COPIES TO: Representative Owner File PA 87-068 ITEM NO. 6+ File V-8422 The Applicant appealed the Zoning Administrator's decision to the Dublin City Council. On May 24, 1982, the City Council continued the appeal indefinitely pending completion of the sign study and adoption of the Sign Ordinance revisions. Consequently, the sign has been in place for approximately five and one-half years. Since the Applicant has recently filed a Site Development Review (SDR) request for a storage addition, it would be appropriate to resolve the sign issue at this time. The City's Sign Ordinance revisions adopted May 12, 1986, did not result in changes affecting the Applicant's Variance request. Section 8-87.34 b) of the City's Zoning Ordinance relating to freestanding signs prohibits the location of freestanding signs within required setback areas. The existing 17 foot tall freestanding sign is set back 15 feet from the front propertyline (within the required 30 foot front setback) . The intent of Section 8-87.35 of the Zoning Ordinance relating:to alternate types of freestanding signs is to allow certain types of signs (1) low profile sign, 2) office building master identification sign, 3) service station display structure, 4) shoppingcenter ,master identification sign, and 5) C-2-B-40 directory sign) within the required setback area. Subject to approval of a Site Development Review, the Applicant may utilize a low profile sign with a 6 foot maximum height and a 24 square foot maximum sign area within the front setback area. In order for the Applicant to retain the existing sign in its present location, the City Council would need to overturn the County Zoning Administratar's denial by adopting a Resolution making the following affirmative findings based on fact: 1) the Variance authorized doe's not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity; 2) special conditions and extraordinary circumstances apply to the property and do not apply to other properties in the vicinity, so that the strict application of this Chapter deprives the property of rights enjoyed by other properties; 3) the Variance authorized meets the intent and purpose sought to be achieved by the regulations in this Chapter; and 4) the Variance authorized does not adversely affect the orderly development of property and the preservation of property values in the vicinity. Staff recommends the City Council uphold the Zoning Administrator's action denying the Variance request in that 1) granting the Variance would constitute a grant of special privilege, 2) there are no special circumstances related to the physical characteristics of the site which would warrant granting the Variance, 3) the Variance request is inconsistent with the intent of the Sign Ordinance, and 4) the Variance request adversely affects the orderly development of property in the vicinity. Should the City Council decide to grant the Variance request, or if additional information is needed, the City Council should continue the item to allow Staff to prepare a Resolution approving the application or provide the necessary information. -2- RESOLUTION NO. - 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN -----------------------------------------------------------7------------------ UPHOLDING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S DECISION DENYING V-8422 KEITH HOLMES SIGN VARIANCE FOR KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN WHEREAS, Keith Holmes filed an application for a Variance, V-8422, to allow retention of a freestanding sign located in a required 30 foot front yard setback and not in the middle one-third of the lot in a "C-2-B-40" (General Commercial) District, located at 6797 Village Parkway (Kentucky Fried Chicken) ; and WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found.to be categorically exempt; and WHEREAS, upon holding a public hearing on March 3, 1982, and considering all reports, recommendations and testimony, the Zoning Administrator made the following findings of fact: a) • There are no special circumstances applicable to the property which deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by. other property in the vicinity under the identical zoning classification as the property has no extraordinary circumstances which deprive it of the opportunity for`the permitted low-profile sign in the front: yard or a freestanding sign`behind the 30 foot setback line; i 1 b) the granting of the application-will constitute a`grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone as approval of a :freestanding sign in the front yard represents a privilege not available to other parcels inthe vicinity; C) the use will be detrimental to persons or property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare as approval of the freestanding sign in the front yard represents a precedent having the effect of removin g the B-40 zoning from the property this should be considered by the legislative body not accomplished by administrative action; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator, unable to make the three I mandatory affirmative findings of fact, denied the Variance request; and i WHEREAS, on March 10, 1982, James McLey of Cal-Neon appealed the Zoning Administrator's action; and WHEREAS, the Dublin City Council held a public hearing on April 26, 1982, and May 24, 1982, to consider said appeal; and WHEREAS, upon considering all reports, recommendations and testimony, the Dublin City Council continued said appeal indefinitely pending completion of the City sign study and Sign Ordinance revisions; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 1986, the Dublin City Council adopted Ordinance No. 7-86 revising the City's Sign Ordinance; and WHEREAS, said Sign Ordinance revisions and subsequent Ordinance amendments did not establish or modify the City's sign regulations affecting the Applicant's request to retain a 17 foot tall freestanding sign within the 30 foot frontyard setback and not within the middle one-third of the lot; and WHEREAS, on April 30, 1987, in conjunction with the Citywide sign survey, the City Zoning Investigator provided written notification to the Applicant and Property Owner that the existing freestanding sign was illegal and must be removed by May 30, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has not exhausted the appeal process for said sign, and the May 30th deadline was extended pending City Council action on the appeal; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on said appeal on June 8, 1987; and HIBIT. i 1191 }t ''�S ._. _. :R�,w41e?: �'�' s�:'S.r .��FSI •4� _ „F. z'�t.��' _ .� _ 'Ei•ffitk WHEREAS, roper notice of said public heaL._-.g was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending the appeal be denied; and WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED- THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find that: ' 1) The granting of this Variance will constitute a grant of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity, in that all properties within the City are limited by the City's zoning regulations for the specific district in which the property is located. All properties within the C-2-B-40 General Commercial District are required to maintain a 30 foot frontyard setback in which no freestanding signs shall_be located, except for those alternate types of freestanding signs identified in Municipal Code Section 8-87.35. .of the Zoning Ordinance (i.e. , low profile signs six foot maximum height and 24 square foot maximum sign area) and subject to Site Development Review approval. i t 2) There are no special conditions or extraordinary circumstances related to the physical characteristics of this property which are unique and which do not apply to other properties in the vicinity, $o that the strict application of the sign regulations does not deprive the property of rights enjoyed by other properties; in that although the site is irregularly shaped and slightly smaller in area than that required in the C-2-B-40 district (site area existing = 37,069. square feet required site area: — 40,000 square feet) these conditions do not affect the property development's ability to maintain the required 30 foot frontyard setback nor does it affect the placement of a low profile sign. With respect/ to placement of the sign not within the middle one-third of the a lot, special circumstances do exist in that the site is currently developed with a driveway located in the approximate middle one-third of the lot. Placement of a freestanding sign within, the middle one-third of that lot would be a detriment to the site. 3) The granting of this Variance does not meet the intent and purpose of the Sign Ordinance in that the sign is not compatible with adjacent land uses, and the sign (due to its size and location) represents excessive signage which results in a loss of prominence for other business sites in the vicinity. 4) The granting of this Variance adversely affects the orderly development 3 of property and preservation of property values in the vicinity in that the s sign does not conform to the C-2-B-40 district setback requirements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby a deny the Variance appeal for V-8422 Keith Holmes Sign Variance for Kentucky Fried Chicken, thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator's action denying the Variance.request, and hereby directs the Applicant to bring the freestanding sign into conformance with the City's Zoning Ordinance relating to freestanding signs prior to July 15, 1987. ;i PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1987. z j AYES: fi NOES: '! ABSENT: �t Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk a ,A -2- a �a�tly i.'+. W1� M1p•a7';.r" •nP.. 4Fi u J "Y�a`��q•^T�+f 1 f°Fa y, ,oa^a.'ro'��'i�.a^7A�'.F�".�`�F,p�,�.'�X,o-�'��'`� ,^�i4°� ': a ""c°f'.'!� r al ^s. ..,„� �.�. �!yyyy�y. �+. R ,�, �q,, p' -•app �r . 13 a`...:.1.11',.l s'�:R'.+.'f 1.s J.t 2...a'Y'i+!_tiiilG'.— E 4N..�..�y1�n M��R.:i:S��lai•. ...... .:.. 5.�_ a' ..1�`tv:cl-µdc..... _..n ).S _V....{a R_�..a�,'\.. :.�"!(,�fj•YS,}e4.�`_tt"�.�„F.�.i Y.r„=,...'4".li .4_•...i(.. ,fi.. � APPLICA7 f .N FOR BUII G AND/OR ELECTRICAL, PLUP48 DAECHANICAL PERMIT ,., fECTOR'S-ORIGINAL '\ Cou y of lameda-Building Inspection Dept. 399 Elmhurst St.Hayward,CA 94548(881-8423) / TH AP ICATION,WHEN VALIDATED,IS YOUR PERMIT. Expires �1 Year;, ❑2 Years; ❑ , I v _ I e Inspection Request:881.6654 �, � y ! f# VALIDATE ' E. .�M L ' - �--� ` , naN a... . iHERE.� I. I DING ADDRESS: ` Q 7 yI �"� ��u 7y CITY RL BETWEEN CROSS STS: 11. APPLICANT: ❑OWNER;CONTRACTOR III. OWNER'SNAME: r�,4�/YI.[3-�.l //fCT,� -r PHONE ADORESS:�Z�� /_JrA/C L-� Z CITY yL��/�� ZiP 1 4 L'3 i4 iE 6y.�(� IV. CONTRACTOR'S NAME: 1 PHONE �O ADDRESS CITY�1rl� -SF ZI V. ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER NAME: PHONE STATE LIC.N: ADDRESS: CITY -' ZIP VI.LEGAL DESCRIPTION(Fill In one of the following): PART 2:,ELECTRICAL9 PLUMBING-9 MECHANICAL A.TRACT BLOCK LOT /) A ELECTRICALSERVIC B.BOOK BLOCK l 1 PARCEL $+z�: '..;:, 800 VOID or Less ' v qr.r`_(., '' .;;..: ver 80O Vohs r ..�. C.PARCEL MAP PARCEL Carer•• " Inc:�<•^'P -%'Ea.°bdd 100 NO.` "FEE Over "(rte. ^" Fee '• Ea.'Add KVA 0 100 800 200 KVA 4EFE] VII.DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE .5/6N Mae than 1 meter.50 Ea. = B MOTORS GENERATORS HEATERS FURNACES WELDERS ;Q ELECT CIRCUITe'�A MP CAP . Renewal New Adtlitian Alteration., ReDair Moved Demolish 7 TRANSFORMERS,RECTI ERS AIR COND S'•�x ; A.DESCRIBE NEW BUILDING:Gross Area Sq.FL .9 .. 7 OVER INC.INC •. NO FEE HP.KVA piKw NO. .::'FEE 11P.KVA OR KW NO. %FEE' 0 20 No.Stories Exterior Wall Covering OVEfI-�•' > WER-PC. 3 B.DESCRIBE PRESENT BUILDING: 0 1 15 50 21 30 Gross Area Sq.Ft.No.Stories 1 2 50 100 31 40 C.DESCRIBE ADDITION: 2 5 100 - 41 of Gross Area Sq.Ft.No.Stories 5 15 70 D.IS BUILDING/ADDITION: Heated: Yes No FOR MOTOR GENERATOR SETS; *- 71 100 Cooled: Yes No .1 )M='',;ADD 50'/a,_O TOTAL- 1tit -1-7 NO. F • NO. FEE VIILOESCRIBEALTERATION OR REPAIR WORK OR ADDITION *ITEM ITEM NO. FEE - I 1.'17ectrical c.•... 14.Watts Real •' .:i�' /�.� I '.Atwfancs:''t„^-C' _ ;'f '-6aaaE e�. ` 23.Ug1u StsioarEs 2- Elecinrai • •. Dry Chentirat Fie Eatirouistvng Aooaance or I�W" ; - ..:f"15.«� ..1,3" `t.% •:;,v'. 2t r 3.:Wall PC^9. AOW'1 Outbt Sritem •'•.'4 V;... 4.PwV P0wV System....,.: -.-_-� .Fuel ltvnkq APPI.Not listed Above 25.Flea Alarm S Y• IX.PROPOSED USE OF BUILDING nIa . - 5_ Goa Pyiq System;,- Dortiasde<: :r .a.:-w 2%Fir4.A1amn Detector Not Part of e e. Rahgarnt' a'° -,. 17.Etdmust Fans` '. i• >,... X. PRESENT USE OF BUILDING Z Rprp System .- .. - 7.Duct Pgktg System 18.Fans a Air RaWYry units to a duct..27.Fuel Storage Tanks system .less than 1.000 Gad. XI.VALUATION include costs of all Labor and Material d,CwMeter,}�• ,t -,:":i •• Sototios:aFuelevn^gAoolancea . 9. lrrigatiorlSritam .-( 19.Haaeng orccol Cohaol Elgin"';.: STU HP LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION t0.Register a .. I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9(commencing with Section 7000)of "ArOutlell. .•:1 "U"•_'' Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code,and my license is in full force and effect. / 11 fie 20.t> t eectwn :_, .- �: _ License Class CelS Uc.Number (065 12.Reba.- ng. 21.commerwlar ' i Date �� L� ontracto f`v• R .App/encea 4 :•?Steam rarlgettood y„ i ' OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION�� t3:8abr, I hereby affirm that I am exempt horn the Conhactor's License Law for the (lowing reason(Sec,70 _ Business and Professions Code:Any city or county which requires a permit to construct,alter,improve, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DINGADDRESSt demolish,or repair any structure,prior to its issuance,also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law(Chapter 9 1 (commencing with Section 7000)of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code)or that he is exempt , therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption.AM violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a per-' RCV'D -30-$/ D.I.S. XC.PERMIT PERMIf FEE mit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars($500).): ` --�{ n 1,as owner of the property,or my employees with wages as their sole compensation,wig do the GROUP Y� OVER 60 CNEL PLAN STOR.FEE work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale(Sec.7044,Business and Professions Code:The TYPE SPRINKLED GEOL.RPT.FEE Contractor's License law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,and who yN.' - ... . . does such work himself or through his own employees,provided that such improvements are not intended or WATER �`•n`-S p offered for sale.If,however,the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion,the owner- DRAINAGE FEE builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). 1 1,as owner of the roe SEWER I RECPT M PERMIT PROCESS FEE property.M.am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project(Sec.7044,Business and Professions Code:The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an GAS SUPPLY 6%IF ENERGY SURCHG owner of property who builds or improves thereon,and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) ' licensed pursuant to the Contracto('s License Law.). ENCROACHMENT PERMIT B ❑ tam exempt under Sec. B.dP.C.for this reason APPROVED C�/ ADD'L PROCESS FEE Date Owner USEZONE WORKERS'COMPENSATION DECLARATION .. •• ZONING APPROVAL BAL.DUE 1 hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self•ins.ure,or a certificate of Workers'Compensation (0 Insurance,or a certified copy thereof(Sec.3800,Lab.C.). ; HEALTH DEPT.APPROVAL Policy No. Compail INSPECTION RECORD OCertified copy is hereby furnished. Expiration'Date _ j Certified copy is filed with the county building inspection department or county 11-2 depertme Date�Lr `�T1 Applicant s` r. .-• CERTIFICATE 6F EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' ' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars($100)or less.) 'ts I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued.I shall not employ any person In • any manner so as to become subject to the Workers'Compensation Laws of California. Date Applicant 16-1 TZE-110 NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If,after making this Certificate of Exemption,you should become subject to the ' Workers'Compensation provisions of the Labor Code,you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this . •; permit shall be deemed revoked. , i! v.•. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY y.•., .•i hereby affirm that there Is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this _�,`', ..`�.. v y. _ 'v,;`:=sG +� ',a > �; ,..•,; �`..:�. .;r permit Is Issued,(Sec 3097,Civ,CJ:-.. T.,{ 1r..1+ �..r t,,. s•M'e,.w:tq "�^,l _Y 'Sir ,. +,,A, ., a ...- .. r ,...,:t J)( '� ,ably„ {-, ' 'F - �l.:''1.... "t �, .- ::.t• •.� :t;,_•.. .�.�.5=�:y;:i.•s' t° _ � . t Lenders Name V. F ,t.. . �J y 74,7L, ! Lenders Addieas - ca •,.. •'lha :.y..dthsa. . to { �irL;�.IN^....?'�..,.�w.:•.�i.�`' At ,;� R 7 S't! 7.:t�.i �9. �tti .y..';. L t certlty.that I have_read ihIs nppgcstbn end slate that the above Information Is correct.)agree to comply wlth�,� '-` - t.•tiv: r M a+i`rA.-x.• ,,. '•g city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction,and hereby euthtuite reprase •_• r„� r .r ��;,,•:-.'.• 1 >. tatives of this county to enter upon the above-mentioned property for Inspection purp03e3, k tiS7 Jr 4 .(st' s�y}n ,`r � � O�aS' 31st :a '4, .. r ��. :.i.i,i "Y�y(!rtt'fl."�1�Slgnalure 0l Applcartla t:;(t•.d°..:�.•tvaL'a+ .,..�i,.�t,.,J. vl7k*%S,y:Dero':.a! rt.,,.;"Ti ^+R�?,t�l} tyrnr ,��a.^ya.Li,?_. ,.,,(.1�i?• ih,�. ,.•Y .,�;�. `�ti"c 'l. �..N 4•. : �~ �••9 ) Fp_'• APPROVALS APPROVALS' T �. F_OC1NI)gT10N INA�tEL C1, ' l{JD Qf3Q�lN 4ES :. FINA PLUMB „ 1? t+�^,. y, tr: �'P�FlQHOU D,�.L�li - �rw " ' - FIN t v1'•' � S• ?�'t I•�+'t •. -a r ``�f r`It: ..r; ....., r,' ,L`� 4 ,,. ,.,..•,.._, a.,,.m„n.ru..Iw r..':s.;r,. .k�.....;r:xa.t,.y,._"R?1t:4+:a;8a�i>A;Ss'�:t�•^ u .,3.'+u'.t1d'k,Ee'.Vi`2'`i'r3--' "Svi'.'.r(,'F�. ,i*s,Yth.rti'c.'FIYt :4r "�i'tYi[J> uS ,.:•^`,at:;:.r'X41 .tfv2ti7`sSbl+•�Y"t' -''.fi1h„tii44!..i.e.i,','a �.S:+bl•c ti�*�i� rt�ls ar's..�;;'J~�) t. ,{ ��-_ - ,,,,,•.ril��t//�!�(..i�•�:i•«:'i:i-�.ri..:.(:f�:)..r .,,t:S`.ii�-:ter....:.._-.. _._.._.__._._ _C_... . ... ..._ rr,rn.. - ,. Fyn d�'t =c 1-�'C\L�ko�v� --- — -----....r\V_F.I.I_T..E._'-P!'•�•g w�bl.A�K p6TAl1� WIA%T0 GOPY' WO j 7) ?JPGKDI WL,1411 'WH+Te RARvaR_M., 3 Fz - s`,S°T`1�35 M •' .cx f5• °`r •� •. NE1I1i c--4'F INT. ILLUhI. FaG.E GHANLt - d / 1•. t T CA nlrn� 1� iv �� 1'f exlhrll tt 1791ve-rt4rw menu/ 2 4:.D tp5 � 1 ti E 4J ,j r 'LL ..�orle(t) �� tzeFJS.�E �wr?rn-tct Dt7r�.s�•Y °'��K'1� `� �.:. Ilk 3 %Zet> fz07) ter r r: i PC)fie. �Jr+t're R/o coP�fl I�Rti�irraetnoaoms�r+ F5` .f I - pAJ cK aeTx.l L ou,�cz , n I�be Chonaed WOOD.POt-6 GOJEn►3jtemDSk11 Puthorized by IM Bui{�hW OLYMPIC iR712 6LD�K ' INE�+PII be kept at the bulldtnp sit.e for ♦+ s t'ra ing Inspector.Do not mark or otter. 1.', _ 'U, _ .T s t i• �r�qI fMll not be Interpreted tot»opperorot O �i2s`' 1l:liw t;'F-RBe STANGyNGt 4vI/'?jj4t any proriflons of tM Bultdlrq Code• N � r OCT 1\ � 4 - _ - - • ............ -�.... __ C+� � ' `�bl_eXj t71LSA1�Ex+o�rlwl4� -s • .,� f t=r e Owl" j y _ ,_ 1 r a" Vta,rLn'tf5.-•9 r o. s�t'sar� L4: i =-=5i� rcAU -�LC�/a.TOt,1 a =l r 666 - ` 3 t � o• Tnls If en orlDlnal unpublished CUSTOMER'S APPROVAL•,. - J08 NAME Y_S;xT-LAr we FRJEP �t"�IG�'1✓?'� SCALE d!7 Lt PTfcD DESIGN NO. °O Y - 'this i p created DY CAL•NEON -1 t rf .,r•r X1.1 P-71.1GJ+ PHONE DESIGNER DATE Cj 17» I. SIGNS.II te aubmllled la our Dan `•sonar uae+n eonnecllon w in 1 Oro• r r JOB ADDRESS V I L. E PAR A DRAWN BY. REVISION OL Iecl DelnQ Gtennad for you OY CAL DATE t yN'• ( (0'797 wNr w..,�•' O NEON SIGNS.u u nm to Os enown ,�_,` � !rr� CUSTOMER NAME PHONE SALES REP.7yf� SHEET `OP ; �� I to anyone oYlUde your Or0lnlb• '«^ _ JOO Np. ..�: . nrr. 3 3iCr,+„rrfc; ?�y"r'xur, .F,/",3s'..tk pl'*wrrn a K6 }. ..y g`vs 'rtz 'z 5•wr.t -r. -Y !` F. MIT, mot` ry°N"'4 •tr^ '' '�7�,, ,1(ri3 '�•. - ; �K-�• Y ,» fMc;.: ! *sx{f. %-r }•>,L; �}rf '>'rke;?r'. 7 ?f M F4, 7 :� � "SS �,( S s rrovd3 " " 4-1`..x„ . & °c i� s.ti ' y1!A' -v,';i i ?It ,?Il}M"t(Sftfw..;.r. ...r' 7,",Y,•Mt{A„�•..:,.k.� t,it,1 y 'a+•.,Vrn.� •Sy,Y ? •.y rwa ,�!x'�.,," 4.rr -.hr�.yu: S.,H;,4},:1 'r,•,1 i 4F•'s:d�,: `tA. 4 •p��A "° .,: }NSA'• rv71w`,vF',.n,tr' � r :/i+�l..`h{ .1+J N�w"t Y,.,tr.t'f. -'`'�:•h• +4t•J wi i" Yx� Y7.S' i -,>j. 2t- .'S,'r. .�-: .'.W r,Fit•;,�Q t Ui nyt� .kF,,p .1. .t�tw.d� FF,. '. ".t av,� .5 ri7xh,r7 t L �T ar C•,.,f1 .m.s 1 .i C. F c�nr: �, �kl.d ti ti.N(i s ... •;1�i.7i.'� ^•t. l�l�•'t'' '? .r2`..q.'la. x!17 •c:i• {�}.+^45�'E i!J-t. (`S,,,F,Y, «t -v: iri�r r.b+'rr,,� Lh �• f :y,'S..•-�c-,..tip r� •t I'".+ x., ... .tF,{�♦' aM, ,f •t'' ,.7./�,t,;,.,,y�J a,.b dAS..t.]. s°:+l',;:t a _.; r � at!r n .yx,..•tkry�> ,� i\} J ,.."-�„!�{�'F'ti l,.c• L�rF wa'dyi k a�7• d R; r; l [ r.tic��,,� �•!. „i i.} .?' v1 tv'{'#+'�4 t.f.ri 1'. ^t�vrL t�.,\ ( a,4�p ;�LF , G,.�J,+t, hr .F;fi't t* y,.l': i"ixZ + e., .tr<'§tcl Ci. iGx� �•F .'} �4 ii�sro•nµvr #!B..,r 1 .S'• t f '��1✓�.: F ,� �A �y' '.�� 'yy.•n�66�i''�.,G; !� ynY..R•c hoG `7"�.; �1,.';i5" �,,y' r #Il'...f^.5+: .r.,°^q,,'#. r .c t.,✓4,�i,�. tir n tt .,,r,,•, r �}? �, } '4i rx..- ;?{, ,y,. .r` �. -i,�,•:. ,,k.r.. °„N j s,t 1f :.'+ yt s r i Ird f d` J f .�,F: ti j,.:+.Z Y r ✓�"<r.; l ,y �tG"' 1Ck' �� h{ .� v vY 1' p . -� r I St 1� r Ry� Y ,^�+fJ}+r•J.,rrd C �r t +rCb tf `'C . .,"71 6y.Sr!11 ,+, r'.. �\.n•� v •r.��"r' ;i.T��t��+{+.f Y ['< 'v:G� ky'S w�r�rfi& �?'�.�7� � 'ki... �`,ft.b .s`.4!” + Yre�'£ ��gq y.. :'T ?T`:Yi)✓'F S1 .��,,t(r�[$I,'AC u..,D4 7p+ d"�v'jCi "p';t�yi�,✓ 5��5..rGti a. ,.�<t ,•,r ,J.,r/ s +>~ F f, ,J� ^r t�,"St�e: 1 L�✓ y Sr r )u10'T , ow"Iffi T�y}�", Nil r -fir j,� �3 r j ,.�;�£ a. 1 t k.ua' Y mod .I :./�(�... t,• .,. ...___...___.�_..•... _... .�...ryr�•-r—r•�...Nt'••..C+-.,y.I•S.•µ:+'y i. ALAMEDA COUNTY. PLANNING : DEPARTMENT ' 399 Elmhurst Street, Hayward, California 94544 (415) 881-6401 December 21, 1981 District Manager Cal Neon Harman Management Corp. 1601 Almaden Road ). 1285 W. Tennyson Road San Jose, CA 95125 Hayward, CA 94544 Subject: Freestanding Sign, 6797 Village Parkway;Dublin Gentlemen: { - ) You are advised that the freestanding sign just construc d at'6797 Village Parkw9W Dublin, is not in compliance with the provisions of the z property is located in a C-2-13-40 Zoning District. The most significant feature Of the "13" District requirements is a 30' front setback. The 17.5' high sign may occupy no portion of this setback. The plans "Approved as to Zoning" for the installation of this sign indicated a ' 15' front setback and a 30' side setback. The side setback was based on the 90' frontage width of the lot that was indicated on the plans submitted for building permit. In actuality, the frontage width is 16012 requiring a minimum 53.33' side setback. As previously stated, the Zoning District requires a 30' front setback. For these reasons, both the actual side and the front setback are less than the Zoning Ordinance requirement. This prior Zoning Approval was revoked on December 11, 1981 when we became aware of the error. -- -- . Your alternatives appear to include at least two procedures. (1) Comply with u the Ordinance by removing the sign. Compliance could include replacing it with a "low profile" sign, not exceeding 6' copy height or 24 sq. ft. in aggregate area or relocating the sign at least 30' from the front property line. (2) File a Variance requesting retention of the sign at its present location:- Your attention is directed the.findings required for the grant of a Variance and the requirement that any Ablication be accompanied by language supporting these'affirmative findings. - - - It'should be noted that the facts of the structure being in place or that permits were obtained are not pertinent to these findings. Should you have any questions on this matter,please call Steve Richards of this - Office. Sincerely, P. r o i Z minis o - �. :. . .. t �c �IiPClittg Inspection RPF:tmy - DEC .41981 Enclosure COUNTY OF.ALAMEDA BUILDING-INSPECTION ATTACHMEN DEPARTMENT i. {- (�`+rY'(lf'r'..' ti'r,d^.9+^Ni,(-gglr•,�y+lm�l�• .Ra;S"4 j 7 � 'qY w'4,n tr.+;r_^^y e+..,i^ i.t ^6•e" ?.JK',9 !a :+ rG(+}r?eti.�i'F T"M1,yr i^.'+, yt,�.` p�a'iC $# tin ?x` ;T+.n �y^. d ,i.'::I `a'„� -,K<• !^4'\n '.•r d -+ ..;; r4.. (,ti';sr•+. uG?L"3q:,yz�2,,"{"j-''"v'` .:4�''`.a•1si Sj+ `+'``.t}}�v,i {•�.,.J R.,;tA, �, ,+ '� 1 I r,yf,S•-:-'i,,�t�'$ :d-i`, -t; n '�:r, r, �:a. a'r'.. a' r•��,? r.f ry ,3 h?y ,! ,,.�,''V;,r'S+ y,:Y.?" <4 ,�v� .. •\�_'(' ..X.�r�yr t , �,�,�'✓r F. 1 �7•'a r::�};T.;� p?TI�1lfiM?. 4:•»l. �,5 `t,\< 5�Y ,�,{,`ter C.,lr�e._.i7:. �3�4� f..X`��,r+.IS'Y ",`.,' ,x: �t5 t y:. +n.. 1x S(• t x„�(.�•#.Cc. ��'�.'�1 '` ,.# t ,..� A�v�C•t nv, .�q ,.'h TI .�rau,� �. v R. b ,. k4,-_� •�•lt .I, r•;-' 4 !,t '•^jt�''L%n •,�?a t dtr s „�, t �\�k;��x �,q_k� Y ,�� "# �".;.�•,:?�',c.1s ns.r, � St7 rl �'' �.. * �-� 7;3 �r1,}-. +i +fi LRt RPM F , .,,:hh �. WJ t..}y1 (:.�, T ; : :`}5,r•�1��1µ41"�'h$ ,} er r y�z'it A sr i r ,w r f! y+M a a r Se. u bl��' .`�,'•C,!'+ '� ,',+".+d'h-F`.h'pi.. d"�`�`p�`', ',tk'� ,..c.� �F a ..p�rlf �4,v��FS �:��4�'�• �.`.•,. vft` Wtit 4�1��✓.��f. ,.:�� w�',.�'i.°ti*Ty::TA..y"i � r� o>~. ;w +4+'�7.•;V'�-}}S'"�t�ij 4u ,�... � �,1,si•,rr `� 'tf`5«;SI',5,"-+' �,aa,�N+'t"+ \i...;�"'. 'sh'+�R' i b:� !;3'.a'�u'„ -•} �� 133 C 1 -� �+J it '� L•+ 4.z(!.'. ,d�.. i+S �l � 4�T.+} � e 4(„. � �. � �.. � T.a� �.��t'?k `5 � � �d .,n,2. •Si3a�+;<�� n�p`�•tc �,< ;�,- t'}ry �'}. �a11,1tt�tk`'t'3i,:t„ i f* ��♦tp� ti"�,r-,��` } , 1 � �. s ♦� .1;.•.`rl} 5 '�v1'1f.�SV'.� ,(!�y •�`U 18 • �v ,,!. .Y� �.r4Vr ,•i' ,'Tij y K2 ,��3'j�'.'4jr F "S�t4 �'��• `ti ' • � app' 1 y p', N Z� G„{_,1,J A}G'C . +,.4 '} � :,+ f�� ' nti;L'Y��.� .� .j��p�itli�'�,g k-5? 'il'}.e�r�+rZ' r, vr,? }sk� 4 $+.:irY. ,.,, .k'{. +.8+r�•,�!'fd•, i•1-u°'�_+i� i� ' r •.tiCJ' F��•�y E+"k'+�C, .�L�rt1?:sS, �: `'j+ �°�. �yp •-�, '� .7� �t ia��'.. ,� r,•+ 4'$ '� Y� �_ +`[�•�� ?•R`W �a �•x{Z'S`' �i'ul+L�4� 2`k �.i: y. �� !�V� S��•��f� .',aJ,' . '{`^` r-� �+ t� 1� :\'d •�'+6�!'!'t �.. a •� v r8. �� x�'g v w�,F �' �3 r• w' 'i.''Vi 1'114 1, .,r'/', x 0 Vr fe -,,py J� .5A 42 x 'F1 COUNTY OF-ALAMEDA APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE, do make application for a VARIANCE, of the provisions of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance to permit: (Describe in detail using separate pages if necessary.) FREi7 S ,,2,_t7 -26—, S/Orl-I 7 -7 ;J1 at the following address(es): -7 (street) (city or post office) (zip) and shown as Alameda County Assessor's Parcels) (map) (block) (parcel) NOTE: The law requires that affirmative findings of fact be made in each of the following if your application is to be granted: 1. There are special circumstances applicable to this property which deprive the property of privileges enjoyed n oy ed y other property in the vicinity under the identical zoning classification. (Possible disadvan- tages such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings as compared to other property in the vicinity and zone should be included. 2. The granting of this application will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon-other properties in the vicinity and zone. (The granting of this application will not be a special privilege to you considering other properties are subject to the strict application of the provisions of the. Zoning Ordinance)., 3. Granting this application will not be detrimental to persons or property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare. (Why?) Considering the above findings that must be made, this application is supported by the following facts: -77-).-- C_01_2z_ ,z e--)I= 774?-- /,,-1 T lZ S Fc 7 pq 61-4AE TO 4.OC,4 7-f o I-J. -,7�41E Z-OCA7 /oar 5/2AE 0� 77 -A=- 72- A PR_(_)�ZFF2L- -e f F�O/F A-1-1—/rte (J_'S h-1 ASS P r-:E�> Z n 2:' 4 1 6,ZT-77,eiZ 1_0c^7-/0-14'5 774iF- JA_j 7-62_Se=r_rt 0-1) ?10:ff>E:> -%,/(3 'S Al IS 7— A K-4 d -,z ....... S Mak S i�' \Iv x" Nl.~ Nl'x!.W, 4 as_4.3 T ATTACH � � ,+. r ,�IHM�s � mot:�.' t,.� 1:,•i:•- • C' iM- r r tr,r',.w.J�/.: -V/t !I ,1b:9'�•. { yy �� NA N: N �!. K,,,• 7,1M i�.:j�{} t %f)°t' �$�y 'ft✓1•:'N'•'.'L• ♦i T•„b• -. ,� v 4' yr v�;1 A,l �.: °�5:, t <:N"7a. .r.�il;'.t.('!! ,s,�t, r •tru'�$", `' S1d(`.aw y .`t'f fi. ..�'1'3-. �7t..�.• "..! 1., jv, l r:Jr,+. �,^g�'%y'`' a r y �!/ ;� a-,•N^::, t , 1�?,•�yl-. sy �r l tip l�.r.%7/a'l�f i�•,#4 ?ri(�IriY�,f+.�.. rAS,�,rJ ..tir�.f. .v. /t” >r�".ti��. ,.y;.Y1P4�, _:5 �i p�:r6'!..'7�f +7'i: �r )s .irf '✓ ';`P..l��f�''t�;+,'%�wtf�• � .i„ �': f�i, '�'^1'r`��.�.+'6r7:�"�'S,"+'irn��wX'.iCr RP1+�i��.(,'1�Y.�J17'.dL'.7k!/'AMh:!!15�.7"�lw lbw"is3:Sd]:tf :IGeY:+a:Y1r�n..n��t�0�,�'ifTti,�yytla•Yfd�„�l.:i'1":•'.�•+,+'_:fG:a�:3dl+"s'a1:f.L'°.1�:17"lii::::tx:7!�...r...,. .r.�. 1 1 I attest under penalty of perjury to the truth and correctness of all the facts,exhibits,maps and attachments presented with and made a part of this application. Applicant Date (land owner) Mailing Address 19 y IS s••�rt` �-�/`� ��°s .Phone (street) (city) (Z1p) t Signature -� '''�� Date (lessee or option holder) Mailing Address « y S t�e�.9' %ch h i., s.-) t.` e. Phon Oc) (street)�--� (city) (zip) l Also Notify CAS- �`�''� Phone (representative, etc.) Mailing Address �•O•;�o�c ��ZS F (street) (city) (zip) PROCEDURE FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE: .I 1. Completely fill out application for Variance. Please print or type. i 2. File the following material: (a) One copy of the application; (b) Ten (10) copies of site plan; (1) Site plan shall include all applicable information required on"typical plot plan"instruction sheet. (c) Filing fee of: (1) $25.00 if property is located within an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District; (2) $60.00 if property is located within any other Zoning District; Check to be made payable to: "Treasurer, County of Alameda". The above material is to be filed with the Alameda County Planning Department, Public'Works Building, 399 Elmhurst Street, Hayward, California, 94544. Telephone 881-6405. Incomplete applications may be returned. 3. Applicant will be notified of date of public hearing at which he or his representative should be present. 4. Applicant will be notified by le :4�y;�of the action taken oh the•applicati 1 � � �t ♦"ia�. ,.l Y•,1 I.lr`, \. � �,�: ,yl"K � .1. I � :Ki i i. \.,Yt >,7- 1 4 9 `.i - , •1 lil y` A,��1 �ti��,�" �,\�y, 5.N[ ,i irk !. \.�.1 .+.a rr.y t.1v L r.+.-,..�y s( ,l ` i •-1„�a w r; �?:';v^•;ts�t r 1_x �'i,�i r .ei 1. a'\ti\ j\\,�. a "�ui S1� T r. ,•• - Y r t 4S,ti i 4-. 1 > A� '� ^ r`.!'.n.t:..�':'; l t • �e " ..`.C';. � '' � •� �i �r,M��`�t�,.r -�. :;t *a. 3Sr1 � i+ o '�` r�7 .� ;k-c !`I .,+ _.,�.. i v'1 \ \� �,.� ;r w...1��t '.1. �L'\'• �.�_�� •h:J :Z°^.�la.•�y...f�.Zx^,_ v\�; :C ^ :+`�. Mi'� .u, t� '- yS L t. '1 :;c'' � ,h 1.. +�v '-1 �ti r?ii',:� ,�'5.�� ,�� >`" �. � r.i ..t��:'..•,\.,�y't'� I.{.'.r I:Sa ,ti.A:'th',r•=V ,�'r„l ^'ti. '�' \ .•�. ., .P�..a sf t.. ,',�sa\,L'4`'i :�.'rJl:}r�;lf' R..,+ ;1`; �a ;d r•,+a,.(1', '•2 ti.ix'r '(a �- -1.. !v:ir ,ni.,+ f.;,./t � .�� ,I+ �`r �A�. ^.'�'�`'c� � R ��•.�, .TV.+ LALyI`+.�:1.'; .'�".��i.��i�`4t��i�V''i`Fr.i'W�-L.^•.... :!�'C,iALI',"7'k�a�,• rIF�:C. ��:95'��ary '•� v1 •i% � 7 r 1 a � �}.. YY ti\- ..a..a.r,w K1 ` r dp��l vn .•ti/Mr�y ;(- .t N1r\. 1 ?;•,.�^S t•C'1 t,.ti;�. {4�yfi�,h. na.�:Y;+t'," •1�• + L�.\ .ii��t I � y fi t't t r, '. � `h ! yy��11, _� .�`i. 5 ':2. ,� �S��`K {'�. ri � Vj �• `::4�.`.1�',��.W �.V.A��., r... .N,' .'4 t�.��.f. ^�} �}�`�•� t �... i• �. �l �}C_�rS x l t. ttis • i+�c.,�.l�a i�• Ti`t r W •! 3 �Y G�'w' { nC','�. :\1 4'd` i`�ci b, y\.- 4•? 'L rAr�:}� }��iZ �•'.$r°"t'�t';�• ”'. u�L(� 1.: t .' S`S4j�+1 t�''C •�tICEt��i.1�a`{�l�t T,r'"` y1,4Af�p4.t�� lV',r U.V.,l4r11.• ` germ,1.+�.,. �..r�'I �;?�+� �• .n• A'n`4a1�,-•IU •.4` �`.A �i• } J.�vy�' 1 •? e�ru�v,!#f,<e�}}�-��J�11�� '3+1��ytt�„�,�fj�M� ��a��fl`i�,Ak�� •1 , �� l `ham. .L' www�y+��C,-,�yil. ,� ti' ��;�,: '� } 4`7e 'ylr�!.•�i( w r. "�v\�•�°f T"'*Yl f�, tr�N,d�j'}`4}E k'�U1.U11��' ".'�4� 4i�.�'r� r? �:Y'', -Y��:i'�ca?:L:i <;ti��DXt��li. :r' � ,1<.� �. Ati).lr, �'w'^ ••ii• AY.- �,r - �-..:•�+ 'u.,yilrr N9',l�`�r_t,�:t�:::X.�,.la.-�'h.o-......f....r'4! ,,�._�;.\�,7., c..,.a.r .n, t�-w']e' +ria*.�F:.s..ivi_.r1.v,< <'�i.." �i.>.._.A.:,°`Y�y.. _Y��hi.4.;s..�.,li3t.>��:��.A�.+6a�r}h..'�..L�-, .}J.ClM�,I..'4�./�.J_fy. Z'... ...,.E .. ....-, ... '�! Zoning Administrator Minu—s January 27, 1982 Page Four rra 10. WILLIAM STEADMAN (LANDWONER) & RONALD MEISSNER (OPTION HOLDER), V-8421, (cont'd.) '-1 Mr. Meissner was present and spoke about losing a great deal of money if this matter is not decided by February 9th, as the.parcel map was filed December 18, 1981. .s Mr. Howard Ward spoke that in his opinion the trees should be removed as they are a nuisance to the neighborhood and are overgrown. Mr. Jack Abram of 4738 Proctor Road spoke next. He owns 7 to 8 acres of the area and plans to join the petition to request a study of this area by the Planning: ?_p Department. He feels the property,. owners should get together to come up with a plan conducive to the future of this area. What is neded in his opinion is a `.j plan for the future. i F Mr. Frank Severs spoke with only one comment: _to thank Mr. Flynn for his concern and interest in the entire situation of this area being. developed. Mr. Meissner spoke in rebuttal. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Flynn for looking into this issue and for trying to understand all the people involved. ' Mr. Flynn then stated he would approve the ,Variance as this would allowretention of the trees and allows flexibility with development on the site. He discussed Apprv'c that prior to the record of a final map, a .serious study of zoning will be made. Z-4589 11. KEITH HOLMES, V-8422, to allow retention of a freestanding sign located in a required 30' front yard and not in the middle 1/3 of the lot in an '!C-2-B-40' (General Commercial, 1 acre minimum building site area, with 30' front yard) District, located at 6796 Village Parkway, west side, 150' north of the intersection with Dublin Boulevard, Dublin, Assessor's No. 941-210-33. Mr. Roger Hamblin of Harman Management Corporation was present to give testimony. He explained that approximately $10,000 in expenses has been incurred so far for this sign which was carefully designed to follow the instructions and require- ments of the Planning Department. He listed all the various signs surrounding. the intersection. Mr. Flynn replied that -prior to 1974, there were no restrictions on signs in ;+ in this zone and the sign described by Mr. Hamblin were built prior to current regulations. Mr. Keith Holmes spoke, stating that he felt he should not have to be asked to cover someone else's mistake. He stated that someone should be responsible for overlooking the particular circumstances of this matter. Mr. Flynn informed the men he will correspond with the City of Dublin and ask regarding the retention of the combining district. The matter was continued to March 3, 1982, the taking of testimony remains open. 12. DAVID D. BOHANNON ORGANIZATION (LESSEE) KUPPENHEIMER FACTORY STORES (LAND (OWNER), V-8423, to allow installation of a sign above roof line in a "C-1" (Retail Commercial) District, located at 455 Paseo Grande, east side, 170' north of the intersection with Paseo Grande, San Lorenzo, Assessor's No. 412-34-9-6, 11-2. Apprv'd. Mr. Mark Wright was present and stated he was in complete agreement with the Z-4590 staff analysis. Mr." Flynn- confirmed the tentative findings of the application, and approved _ ;. the application as submitted. 13. ROBERT LAVASSANI, V-8424, to allow construction 6f two dwelling units so as to reduce driveway width from 20'. .to 17'.; reduce the distance between access drive and a dwelling wall from'.the required 10' to 9.35' reduce a 0M EATTACH ENT tip+� � ,t P� IMF .t t' •.ct -'�_�}y i + - tP y.'te'a,�k �i.s}.. .. .� n -•..t.. . .y: .'.\'..�.: . .. .., 1.}_+i ! ,,,. .,.:��. 4.c' ...;f'_.. S hP..rk -. . '.5,;!!".:�sk^..Y.rat.,w.i4.','�..1-..CN!P1�v.�':.sti'.�:Y:i4N 1v.:7k`!3.A1f:.24.t'L•a:.a.W:...1w7?:ik.. 4+.. p.,. n..,. ..,. e. ..__. .... ... •.,.... ,..h. ..ti...,.,,.....w . r......x...a.. .n._••.. .... ,.. ..._.. ,,..._.. ._......... .. 'N`•(F'f�,4tPR �� toy r ' tYJ '�l��tiaM�g� 5r► ,�ri��!�" �r,,,•r K}'�i'j3,�"P'4!•r�'lW�r•rr4+{�Frf�, ��+� � , t f i'h+/'•:. .q} �/. t1 3ip'�'�F"V��yw'�f i4hY.l I�j, w r.9' 'I�FfZ} wA.• IMit RESOLUTION NO. Z-4621 OF ' THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF ALAMEDA COUNTY 'r ADOPTED AT THE HEARING OF MARCH 3119821-CONCERNING V-8422 r� r. f WHEREAS Keith Holmes has filed an application for a VARIANCE, ;.; V-8422, to allow retention of a freestanding sign located in-a required 30' front yard and not in the middle 1/3 of the lot in an "C-2-B-40" (General Commercial, 1 acre minimum building site area with 30' f ront yard) District, located at 6797 _ Village Parkway, east side, 150' north of the intersection with Dublin Boulevard, Dublin, Assessor's No. 941-210-33; and f i WHEREAS the Zoning Administrator did hold a public hearing on said application at the hour of 1:30 p.m. on the 3rd day of March, 1982, in the Alameda `. County Public Works Building, 399 Elmhurst Street; Hayward, California; and WHEREAS it satisfactorily appears from affidavits on file that proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS this application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found to be categorically exempt, class 5 h; and W14EREAS a Pre-Hearing Analysis: was submitted recommending the application be denied; and WHEREAS applicant appeared at said meeting and presented testimony . in support of the application; and WHEREAS the Zoning Administrator did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony as hereinabove set forth; Now Therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Zoning Administrator finds that: (a) There are no special circumstances applicable to the property which deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity under the identical zoning classification as 'the prbpetty has no extraordinary circumstances which deprive it of the opportunity for the permitted low-profile sign in the front yard or a free-standing sign behind the 30 foot setback line; (b) The granting of the application will constitute a grant of special privileges-inconsistent with the limitations upon.other properties in the vicinity and zone as approval of a free-standing sign Y '' in the front yard represents a privilege not available to other parcels in the vicinity; (c) The use will be detrimental to persons or property in the'',neighbochood or to the public welfare as approval of the free-standing sign in the front yard represents a precedent having'the effect of removing the B-40 zoning from the'property--This should be -,.considered by the legislative body-not accomplished by'admihlstrative action. . . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Zoning Administr ,.. ` ator does hereby deny said application as shown by materials labelled Exhibit "A" file with the Alameda County Planning Depactment: 4%2— t , RICHARD P. FLYNN 'ZONING ADMINISTRATOR '�, 4 A;� ' :'° tr ALAMEDA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT � '�� + . a \tlt < °1' -"'" ' Str r'ii'jF � r•4t.'v"? 't^, '.'+r':'+$ fir s. t `a rjt 3 !t S.:. } . �r!1iS� •4'.15.?i'�'r\r*• , t �_ r' . , � i i f t 4•i t Y ,'� tt .' 5� !w\ f k"�,�'fKft'�'r'u[r + nF r 'Illy• ` . \v a �5 .LT w , t •• r}y,f R .d.'1S' 1+. __.,_...n3u..� tt;.:.�... .utr_._.��•4 s\�i Pf't}�j t,;,, ,.j� r t TA M_ E �x rt'y t'� ,�`' ',4� �„f _SI A�Ht i',tt \� i+.} i•jtt a > \'ft., �j�'�i`W,t�a+�R,��k ~ �t�w: t5��t „t"t �•frp ri3 lis+,, :7��1 \ 4 `�}Ar�`�,§,,a yx t1t�t q�"�;4,r'�' �.�:'1 } '.:¢ +�`•M�i i ��i'lrv�n%a F:iLiite:.r�Th1�t�.. .,\S '7., ,i' k1n �'�:•"�i,�`�hit^. �i.r. ''P' ''4 . \ < x •�7'S'\� �� ,?,w�.•Crl '?';te! �,`?\ •',�:- F �1 � Y��. T*F+a �;h:1'�� l�'R: � \ ° r;_ rr p, ,s} S +,��:"F'`� �f��',z`r ;C ,f-- ,vi �i y r r ^ ..✓t a: P.. i. 1 . !ti. .l 4t:. .;P,.v ,t^1\ q MP "!i, •.tM>u., : <i, k ^'* ......r,0 l"s�I. _ ..1--ry.�i�•_ a..._.,✓,.��a.,. ,., ,. .. ... 114' Y Q � t..t*• .t •i. }' f 1 � d r � .. tip ;.k1 UD ' 1982 CO 7 M.archj0,'.l982 v. 0 City Council C= M City of 'Dublin rTj P.O. 'Box 2340 -:7 Dublin Calif. 94566 We are .appealing,.the"'decisi6n 'of the Zoning Administrator - 9 -4621 'dated 3- 8,' n which .our application on Resolution #Z 3 Z "i i .variance (V8422) ,.W*asdenied`7;,'Keith'Holmes -is `66 appli-' for a cant. Prior to drawing And, plotting the sign in question I contacted the County Planning Department with pictures and an','-,,'* address. At this time .l .was given verbal guidance and*a''tab 1. e'.. to determine size, height and setback. My drawings were ulti- mately approved by planning, who said they were familiar with the property. The plans were then submitted to the Building Department where they were reviewed, and approved. The sign was then installed as approved by the Planning and Building Departments'. At this time we were advised by Planning that approval*was mistakenly given by the County. In. our opinion tl.ie.,sign meets the necessary criteria for approva, ---'Sincerely -4 j ames McLey, _ r.,: 'Jm:cll I A ........ ILI,I= ' Ay ...... "PLASTIC WOOO & ELECTRIC SIGr\' AT.TACHMENT 01 ALM:�OEN ROA1D,;SA6TJOSE:"Ci N, " LING AO[DRES :'P 0 Bt ; V�v t: Q 0 CITY OF DUBLIN Iff- P•O. Box 2340 DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 94568 CITY OFFICES April 30, 1987 6500 DUBLIN BLVD. CERTIFIED MAIL ADMINISTRATION' 829-4600 BUILDING INSPECTION Harmen Cafe Employees Profit Sharing Plan! 829-0822 1270 E. 2100 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 CITY COUNCIL RE: ILLEGAL SIGN AT 6797 VILLAGE PARKWAY IN A :C-2-B-40, GENERAL 829-4600 COMMERCIAL, DISTRICT CODE ENFORCEMENT D6ar Tenant/Owner: 829-0822 A -sign survey made September' :18, 1986, revealed: a freestanding sign at the above address. ENGINEERING 829-4927 Site Development- Review* 5-583 approved only a "Low Profile" sign not to exceed 6-feet-high and-2T square feet of sign area You have a FINANCE freestanding sign 17-feet-high with 100 square feet of sign area. A 829.6226 Variance to retain the sign was denied. PLANNING Section -8-87.74(a), Ordinance".7-86,'* states, "any signs and their 829-4916 supporting members erected without first complying with all ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of -their construction, errection or use- is an illegal sign. and subject.'.to summary removal.,- POLICE 829-0566 Therefore, .you a I re require( to -remove'.'-the,*freestanding sign by May 30, 1987. PUBLIC WORKS Your cooperation is appreciated. --.-,If you have an -please 829-4927 y .questions feel free to contact me at RECREATION 829-4932 anita Stag'ner Zoning Investigator ............ Attachments: — Sect. 8-87.74(a) Ord.'...7-86 eff. 6-11-86 -c Sign' A ...... c:.. mortiza' tion File'.*;-..- Kentucky Fried Chicken '. AT T. TACHMEN Harman kentucky Fried Chicken® Ffn dt0b'wc k 0 6797.-Village Parkway Dublin, CA 94566 May 12, 1987x,,:;-�' i Fz- U i • i Y �v:\ � 3 Juanita Stagner '" " ==• •- Zoning Investigator. CITY OF DUBLIN P. 0. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 i F RE: Sign at 6797 Village Parkway, Kentucky Fried Chicken Dear Ms. 'Stagner: We received your letter of April 30, 1987, regarding the illegality of our sign at the referenced location. At the time this building was remodled, all of the necessary permits were obtained and any requirements or restrictions that were made known to us were complied with at that time. I am enclosing copies of correspondence with your office and the Chamber of Commerce regarding events relating to this sign. Sincerely, Keith Holmes Division Manager KH/ kj enclosures AT-TACHMtri 1 N Harman Kat Kentucky �� 4en,, Fried Ckiekex 6797 Village Parkway n .. Dublin, CA 94566 May 6, 1982 Dublin Chamber of Commerce o Attn: Leonard Bowe A .7465 Village Parkway Dublin, CA 94566 RE: -Suppose Sign Violation ' Gentlemen:-, . ! j p� After many meetings witti both the,'Alameda Planning Commission and. the Dublin City Council it appears that we are going: to have to re-design our sign so that we' can -meet local regulations. Before construction started, our sign company, the district _ . manager and myself went to the County to receive sign regulations i as to size, height, and location. We submitted drawings, render-, ings, and plot plans to the County. After receiving the permit to install the sign:,we had the County inspect the excavation, we than proceeded to install the sign— After final inspections were made we were told by the County of Alameda that we were in violation of local city ordinance and that they had given us the wrong informa- tion as to zoning requirements. ~ ti We were willing to install any size, shape, and color of sign that they would allow, but now we feel 'that we should not have to pay for mistakes made by. county employees. The sign is not in poor condition as others on the Bouleyard, and maybe this could give us j .time to change our'sign when others in the area are remodeled. This . would also allow us to expense the cost over a few years. We don't want to make enemies with the Alameda County or the Dublin City Council as we would suffer with future dealings with these government agencies. Any help and support from the Chamber of Commerce would be very much appreciated as this is something . that could happen to any businessman. in-the area. ` It is very had for a small businessman to make a profit in ` these economic times as you can see from the closing of many business outlets in the area. It is also very frustrating when you follow instructions to the letter 'and later be told that the job is wrung, especially when you deal with people who don't have- to spend their own money. ' t u r• .'a 2 May 6, 1932 We would like the businessmen in the community aware of the problem that we encountered and would appreciate any support in this matter. ' If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (415)786-2900. Si ncerely,:,.; Keith Holmes { t Kentucky Fried Chicken sDivision Manager, KH/bb :T HE CITY OF DUBLIN liw" A sasss (415) 829-3543 � r+ March 30, 1982 v � F Cal-Neon P.O. Box 6325 San Jose, CA 95150 F The City Council has received your appeal=regarding the decision !of the Alameda County Zoning Administrator on Resolution No. Z-4621 ; dated 3/3/82 denying variance V8422, .Keith Holmes applicant. _ s It was their decision to set this matter for hearing on April 26, 1982. The meeting will be held at the Dubli in Library; 7606 Amador Vall ey Blvd. , at 7:30 p.m. Very truly yours, Dorothy Hock, City Clerk cc: Planning Department, Alameda County � • a'1 . "� Loa "�tw; < q r TF€E CI TY..OF,,DUBLITTN 7 .,;r ^�ri � r YiFI T✓t L t t .. .,. Box 2340 Jublin.CA 94566 e....;' :.*Y�-' .�.;. (415) 829-343 June 3, 1982 Mr. Keith Holmes r ' 1295 West Tennyson Hayward, CA 94544 Subject: Variance V-8422 Kentucky .Fri.ed Chicken Sign - f , Dear Mr. Holmes: This letter: is written to inform you that the City Council at its meeting of May 24, 1982, continued the public hearing on your appeal , until such a time that the City's sign regulations have been compre- hensively reviewed. You will be notified when your appeal is to be considered. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Richard C. Ambrose City Manager RCA:jef .cc: Cal Neon �ih b\ C f 1 •t 1 S .: . .. .. �� C t .1 S k\OY,C r�.'+rSe .4 1f L1� • 1,r s� fxxl�. tii � ,,i• a� �.. \ . 1 .\ ,• � a, a. n r* �'; \ � ``;Vjrn ,",�`` ry<<r.i,t Ltie' �`'„ � , , l�t ea•u� : x ,t r ,., , >+,�f��' x '"' Ya'-:G:. �;• w .t4i 1tit.,�,�.r', V�•SY,, 'LPL t .hr` i , -- r YZ�,1•,• - S •6r-•t1{4 � ,�~ `y�i�.c.7 .. � � K.ti: �'�' �E'°i�14''<<t� 2 i w n; .t 13 � �¢�,�y �i"�J<', r. _ V�- ♦'i +i .r,A, �t��, +.}, '�� • �'a ,,.r„, .,�4..v...�7,�..r �;_r.tl� t'!.:,.�,' .. ..,._ ...-:1, .,..._ _.. .?�,= .tk•:.'�: .�,.: ..,KS�+....,,.�,r3`��F..�:�.,_:t .�'�., ,.� 1 .►�:,.