HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.8 Neg Dec Civic Center T f
O0 J
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 27, 1987
PUBLIC HEARING
SUBJECT: Review of the Negative Declaration pertaining
to the proposed construction and operation of a
52,000+ sq. ft. Civic Center with Adminstrative
Offices and a Police facility, including
approximately 214 parking spaces and
landscaping on an 11.6+ acre site.
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Draft Resolution regarding Negative
Declaration
2. Planning Commission Resolution regarding
Negative Declaration
3. City of Dublin Civic Center Project
Description
4. Negative Declaration/Initial Study
5. TJKM Traffic Study
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Open public hearing.
2. Hear Staff and Consultant presentation.
3. Take testimony from public.
4. Question Staff, Consultant, and the public.
5. Close public hering.
6. Adopt Resolution approving the Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The estimated funding necessary to construct
the Civic Center Facility is included in the
approved 1987/88 Fiscal Year Budget.
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the City's plan to build and operate a new Civic Center
facility (on the 11.6+ acre site located between Dublin Boulevard, Sierra
Court, the Alamo Canal and Interstate 580) an Environmental Assessment must
be completed prior to beginning construction. Per the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act, Staff has completed an Initial Study
analyzing the potential environmental impacts associated with the
construction and operation of this facility. Staff has found that this
project, inclusive of the appropriate mitigation measures, will not have a
significant effect on the environment, and therefore a Negative Declaration
has been completed.
On July 6, 1987, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the
draft Negative Declaration/Initial Study. After hearing the Staff's
presentation, taking public comments, and listening to comments from the
Project Architect, the Commission deliberated on the item. They posed a
number of questions to Staff, and ultimately voted to adopt a Resolution
recommending that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance which finds that the proposed project will not
have a significant effect on the environment. The item is now before the
Council for consideration.
A review of the Initial Study (Exhibit 4) shows that there are several
potential environmental impacts associated with this project. All of them
have been or will be mitigated by the measures listed in the Initial Study.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO. A COPIES TO: Planning Department
1 .
An item of concern is whether soils on the site have the capacity to
support the foundation and potential seismic activity. A "dynamic analysis"
report by y -a Structural Engineer is to be completed.'"'The recommendations in''
that report will be applied to the project in order to insure sound
foundation support.
Another item of concern is traffic. It was found that traffic generated
by this facility will not create adverse impacts on the existing transpor-
tation system and therefore no mitigation measures are necessary.
Finally, with respect to noise, it shall be required that the Civic
Center facility be constructed using noise mitigation techniques to insure an
adequate internal sound level.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving
the Negative Declaration.
-2-
A:
. ........
RESOLUTION NO., 87
,":A RESOLUTION.,OF ,THE. CITY .COUNCIL*-!-�
OF 'THE CITY OF DUBLIN
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED 52,000+ SQUARE FOOT CIVIC CENTER FACILITY ON AN 11.6+ ACRE
SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST'CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND SIERRA COURT
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin proposes to construct a 52,000+ square foot
Civic. Center with City Administrative Offices and a Police Facility on the 11.6+
acre site located on the southwest corner of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , together with
the State Guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain
projects be reviewed .for environmental impact and that environmental documents be
prepared; and
WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted finding that the project, as
proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this application;
• and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Negative Declaration was given in all
respects as required by State Law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the Negative
Declaration at a public hearing on July 6, 1987, and recommended that the City
Council adopt the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did review and consider the Negative
Declaration at a public hearing on July 27, 1987; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the construction and operation of
the Civic Center facility will not have substantial adverse effects on health. or
safety, or be substantially detrimental to the public. welfare, or be injurious to
property or public improvements; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council finds as
follows:
1, that the project to construct and operate a 52,000+ square foot Civic
Center facility on the 11.6+ 'acre site located on the southwest corner of Dublin
Boulevard and Sierra Court will not have a significant effect on the environment;
2. that the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in
accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline regulations; and
3. that the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council hereby approves the
Negative Declaration for the construction and operation of the Dublin Civic Center.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of July, 1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
EXHIBIT
�r`r ,, �y.y.;� y :. ;tii��. ���}x;.vt' w',�y�x:''r�7i n•ra. •��.Y J. ;� � '�.;,t �,nyS_'t ;r'r .�:.,�
"t q -�v�� "
S .�:A`' :•'t"t 7.3:f , _°i.s r
3/ `�.J 4,ri(' �nD� ��1 �i}r u�? n 4!f{'�'•" _ -a F's�y e`'9.r;�.t t i'1tJ j 'y�r,�r',�.r y+/P�.t✓.•�,ffr X� jlj�f,[S!r'f£,y1 i
{{<n4;'' ��(�� s t ,r1 "tti �d r.p'; : ra•`6 r.•,. x•, &4t?. �✓/i� F+A�! fl{G .
�t� � )J' '�'���J.�qh�S" L f j 1J rF. n�, r r� y-�J hi •x'!y''aJ �W i - tE�.
tt Z a ' � �c•Ir r•J'7,1'r• t f r 3+ty t ., 3 . r �r tilt dn�ra��}f J1zL�t..L
RESOLUTION NO 4`87
rr tsS:� ° .r - ^ (,.� s � n�r't gr7 v r ''''d ( •�JT"Y i.
' ' lr uSS t. �. < • ] -}� T.d(`rry 4, ,. lr'J Y3n�• �f,,,.yfn,yf
ti� L . ...,.•• -..x:.o......—........:....t....)t,.;h- r.."s r r!��'� 1 Ft 1 1 C�� f ro`�
1' A RESOLUTION -OF.,THE:PLANNING COMMISSION {'
,r
OF T HE CITY OF
i/4 {br - i '1i T•a .f t, t tit rRrJ Ytr rip 1 � {�� i
r -:. :rti...•,. .... ,. «.•...._..,•. ,' .. ' 't t K s✓ •! ,ia ;��, i,,yJ !!����p , ,y%�r
---- -- - - - r . _ rP ?L K•
f 3
n.a'',r` Y}. ;.," , i6. 1_...� t„J.,i � _., n ,x � „ltYY �., 'r '.�-;SII+..�7fCs{'�i y ,'ri F f. a'• ti .
rRECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCII. ADOPT ANEGATIVE 'DECLARATION OF R t $ i
`•• ENVIRONMENTAL"SIGNIFICANCE FOR CONSTRUCT ION 'AND OPERATION OF THE'PROPOSEDr `
•;
- ''52,000+'SQUARE FOOT;CIVIC='CENTER-FACILITY ON
AN 11.6+ ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD
AND SIERRA COURT
WHEREAS; "the City of Dublin.proposes'to construct a 52;000+ square '
foot Civic Center with City Administrative Offices and ''a"Police=Facility on°the
11:6+ 'acre site located.on 'the southwest corner of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra
Court; and r
- WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act' '
QA
with the State Guidelines and City environmental regulations',".
require"that .
` "certain pro j ects'be "reviewed for ,environmental 'impact and that"environmental`
documents'be 'prepared, and
WHEREAS,'*an'initial study=was conducted finding that th e"p ro
ject;
as proposed, .would not have' a significant effect on'`the environment;:and i
WHEREAS, a Negative'Declaration has been prepared for'.this
-application; land -
:WHEREAS,' public notice of-the Negative'-Declaration was given"in'all
respects as -required by State Law; :and
WHEREAS;` the Planning Commission did review and consider the '
Negative Declaration at a public hearing on July 6,1987;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
finds as follows: '.
1. that the project to construct.and operate a 52,000+ square foot Civic
Center facility on the 11.6+ acre site located on the southwest corner of
Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court will not have a significant effect on the
environment; _
2. that the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in
accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline 'regulations;
and
3, that the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission hereby
recommends that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration for the
construction and operation of the Dublin Civic Center.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
- r d �,t 1"r...•• tt Y \ tb s �4''J/t "t1``� Hiff
•' '. '., ,". t "�s ate, 'J« ) Li« a `' .,� ya. t . ty >' '�� - .: i r ,
�'_... .. n .. a#i„F \ S.. ....:t.`.y .....c3• .r(''.y.':+n.$Y't,. .,-:"11'x,_ r:.t.. �f. i a'',
A'. .'+J✓�•idGl�.tip..Etc+✓'w7..1.�..i.�N•J/�.4�Y. /......� . .. i....::l.a -;....�.�1.+b���iY.•1/i;�V'.i�(f.6�itl:r�c7t:u�/.YF.9i�.�i'1LlMd t' �Y9y ��I...'.taM
S Iry
CITY OF DUBLIN
CIVIC CENTER
Project Description
Purpose and Need
The City of Dublin has identified the need and provided funding ror the
development of permanent City Administrative Offices and Police Facility.
The proposed 52, 000 + square foot facility is to be located at a .central
location to service the existing City and areas which may be annexed into
the City in the future.
The proposed facility is planned to accommodate City Administrative Offices
and a Police Facility. The Civic Center will provide parking space for
approximately 214 vehicles. The majority of the parking will be open for
use by the general public and may serve as overflow parking for the
adjoining Dublin Sports Grounds complex.
Project Design
The project site involves an 11. 6 + acre property at the southwest corner
of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court. The subject property is north of
Interstate 580 between the Alamo Canal and a new entry road recently
constructed at Sierra Court. The facility is designed as two semi-circular
wings with an interior courtyard. The exterior has a paved plaza area
adjacent to the main entrance.
The Administrative Offices Wing is proposed to accommodate the following
components : office space for Administration, Finance, Recreation, Planning,
Building, and Engineering/Public Works; a Regional Meeting Room containing
1250 + square feet; a 160 + seat Council Chamber; a community television
studio; employee locker room; and associated support facilities . The size
of the Administrative Office Wing including the Council Chambers, Regional
Meeting Room, and Cabletelevision studio is proposed to be approximately
32, 613 square feet.
The Police Facility Wing is proposed to contain space for the following
functions : Administration/Records, Investigations, Patrol, Communications,
Short-term Holding Facility, Emergency Operations Center, and other support
facilities . Adjacent to the Police Facility will be covered parking and an
area to clean vehicles. The facility will have an enclosed sally-port for
use in the transfer of individuals in custody to the holding area. ' The
Police Wing is proposed to contain approximately 19,390 square feet.
Construction activity with the project's development will include grading,
site clearing, paving, drainage, building construction, and lighting. The
project will be constructed to comply with State of California Development
Requirements for Handicapped Accessibility and with Title 24 Energy
requirements .
EXHIBIT
z =
- 1 -
� �r•.ti?.'s) .Mr4. 'r�I LAM.'4'ir�er.-tj'!',tr,'�•;uet,rSfN'f+-`'f/,n"f'niy. �.y)y5/.61N+W }�{1fi31�rr7.�1G'"�il�r. '�.n'�:w�4''�'ji w.�ua..w» s'u��'�.u.`.1'�...,s, ... .,r ., . '
A noise study was conducted at the site to determine noise contours. The
noise at the site ranged from 60 db to 75 db with the higher levels
registering adjacent to I-580 and Dublin Boulevard (see diagram) . The
majority of the building will occur in the area with a 60db reading. The
construction of the building will include noise insulation features to
mitigate any unacceptable conditions.
Location and Configuration
The project is located on approximately 11. 6 acres fronting Dublin
Boulevard immediately west of the intersection of Sierra Court.
Approximately 0. 8 acres of the site has been utilized for the construction
of an entry roadway. The location is immediately adjacent to local and
regional transportation routes . A traffic signal at Sierra Court will
control access to and from the site. A secondary access on the west side
of the project will provide access for Police Vehicles and deliveries .
•- �J�, .i :e� COn � C•i:•"=�°:�::i-=��_:-��.i':i'::.•,gip::
' • ... -�iG.�-=s� \� 'i"� •Win.:✓ � :: :_:_i.•��_'"".';`:
• _� ""��C _•�.:-e-' �, .'...tom=:-:_�>;=_zx:-r.�.=:�:..:;_
t,
% 31
osEC'! _I
.i
J� .L
_ CITY OF DUBLIN . _ N
PROJECT LOCATION . MAP
Project Title DUBLIN CIVIC CENTER to of 02 11.7 0.4 os 1U CkT 4s w tO mil.
APN-941-1401-014-05
+ n.- A r. 6900 DUBLIN BOULEVARD. DHM—CA '
;e�i{ ?�'k t��[�.4�SY r"• � �� \'r Z�� c t 1 r' "t r ..�5
i5 M—N
t�ty �t`1��'?1�} �a.S x ;+ 'r1*L+} t \ t ' - 1 tr �1 1 •I+ tvri• �Ol/p gird
• t+x� 7�� �y�1L�•�•.. ti.- ,t`` t 1 �z n' � 1 �, 7 i h '1:-.� ,. ~'••� •� �:�r.
'••'d {� tt3-����rK r t �i Fi 1 tl, z � + t'� � r � ;1f111111• ,•,(111►�111. r:
�~� �y�`�� r4��y#s t� � :�'+F �t. Si��. ,+a r tip, ,+ i. +'' Y� ' •':i; �'
\7t 4 S'v t�a3 i ip L )'} 1 4 :y •'� / , '
�� ��,1�"s �� 2< r �.>g'"s{ a'�L. + S 1. ��dTt. � i r' , ,. .®• 1 1� i.� +
L
}+ //�' L''vYr\L�••} y-ko•wi 1i °,rt, LtC�� Y t Fy�,; 'ys' . +tiS 1 11.11 _ r
�/ {
'\ „S�'.'124 't'\ ry- ,• r. tt ti. , / �l r t
at"..� 1� +.- t f' ,I� rt;.y• ni, .+ '1.: �w Ir11111I -� [tr.
�L L';7,y�,tt� "S Sh � t,l�� i l +' .• 1 ,l ,•_i' r �
4. 'i amt RSA ,+. r{ IP x.: [ tL • 111\II/ - '
s•. 'tT r') `iltava is "ys 3 t t �� '' :' ' ;1; •1 1 1.1 1 +
4eR- •1./►rl1► t• .t �(: v+t 1 .,`� '^ .. .Ilt�'I�)k•1 1..
.� I.y lru4[!•. T•z<-x I r \ c l° '' t- C `:v• ,:t •
EXISTING DUBLIN
SPORTS GROUNDS
is .g R�`L. '_ilt��„ F - 5 S\ ] � •„' Idg11/ _ �'•
ryi x�� S- y4.`� S. t-'t .t y4.: 1• .t C porkies .
4a Y:Z �y st` Li
In
4 ti_
t
1 .
Ono 1� mh
f.t, s \ ®•
- • 7 1/u110 lilt
x t PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN ...-fin
r. Interstate 510 ..........
F ” "CAM hKA
C IVIC CENTER.
_ .0 I•T Y o •
~tr.'s: �t-'s r '�`. . . 1 .! •• ' ,
U f. Dl1Ul�UlVU. SOURCE
f' � - : �,'' , - 'r s r .,iJ'r Dv411n�Ird .:,II..r,.:,¢,J,r•,�,..Y•r 1A
, - �_ �.Mwr .•:. isr:►j /'�•(/"�f,:'L �•J.1•r. .1-.'.�:+Y. ! is_ J ..,� r� � ��S+"."'iti T.� _.� w
le -, G�d�.•.t• � 1
et 3 ~ + • INTERMIT ENT /•'1r�i : %/ 60db s.�,.....(�ti••4 •'s ' �,,. "
MECHAN CAL
NOI,
{T I /ys� l�,i';''•rl,' ss 's 'fit r'� i
65 db
h r '�; l �: 'err+ ' \� ;r ..:• .' t •tr• �
',r: l/ •}I'r' .c`r f'�!�
{ 1' I J r•, ,,6!�):'le' 1'• • •` lv .. r s�j�-r��t-'� Ir r. „s.s• /'"• -.+'� .
} I �I ! rl i'�Iy!<jr'!:; `>'TV,r�•r'�rj�i14;•..f,_ 75 •/„ti•"•/ � J"r .
�f •s•' •'••'s• ,r r ./+A �, •(f } 7.1.,h•j(L.i' r di) ,/r�•''•'r i-- '
{ !'fsr/• C�[.T�:'�J�ftrp � I ,s}t,�:[•ll>bII;:':Irl+'��, tar t' It /� •r�. .-••� ��, - ,
s � 'y I ,.) I .`•l:) ,i,, IrHrt.•�.°t ii.ri r� r ,t,r��; rrl'.f�r 'r•
\ I:f' •�•.i; •!r r.j� � r�r �/�sr fr I` (, r.J�.�"•. "'f` ���.
' \ - _1 :f., •1 ( +/-:i. �, try 'r,
\� ,:,.tc•�.:-I.I.I'.�j :��,�h.�:F ;,Its�,/ILI ' • ���... �,r...•'
IL
!Ir''' `\GNP ,.•'�,� �/
NOISE CONTOURS
ef-
loo
` R CIVIC 'C L N J CITY of DUBLIN
=
'�Ceftq;NTNrs.ss T w ^ir t •.,a.d+h.*^tr.'+.e.+w':r r .+ 'usar!arrvx fn ••
D. * �9H4 teL 7sYtt'MnN+ yw.P.vf.+ �,.T«
Jt
v, ." • ��.:.. >>, to t.At s 'it •
CITY OF DUBLIN
• Development Services / Planning/Zonmg.-�..829-4916,
P.O. Box 2340 / ,r 'kBuilding & Safety_;;.829-0$22
Dublin, CA 94568 r Engineering/Public Works .-* 829-4927
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR: CIVIC CENTER DEVELOPMENT/CITY OF. DUBLIN
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) .:.'.
LOCATION AND
PROPONENT: This 11.6+ acre site is located on the .south side of Dublin
Boulevard between Sierra Court (to the east) , Highway 580
(to the south) and the Alamo Canal (to the west) . The
proponent is the City of Dublin.
DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to construct a 52,000+ square foot City
Hall facility which would include the City Administrative
Offices and the Police Facility. It will include
approximately 214 parking spaces and landscaping.':;.; .
FINDINGS: The project will not have a significant affect on the
environment.
INITIAL STUDY: The Initial Study is attached with a brief discussion of the
following environmental components: Ground Water,
Flooding, Air Pollution, Wind Alteration, Soil
Consolidation, Seismic Activity, Liquefaction, Vegetation
Community, Traffic, Odors, Noise Levels, and Energy
Requirements.
MITIGATION
MEASURES:
Please see attached sheet entitled "Mitigation Measures."
PREPARATION: This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Dublin
Planning Staff, (415) 829-4916.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
EXHIBIT
y a 1 r
CITY OF 17U5LIr4 PA No. N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
' I
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.)
Based on the project information submitted in Section 1 General Data, the Planning Staff
will use Section 3, Initial Study, to determine whether a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report is required.
SECTION 3. INITIAL STUDY ' - to be completed by the PLANNING STAFF
Name of Project or Applicant: Civic Center Development/City of Dublin
A... ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING - Description of project site before the project, including
information on: topography; soil stability; plants and animals; historical, cultural, and
scenic aspects; existing structures; and use of structures This irregularly shaped
11.6+ acre site contains an abandoned continuation school; however, it is for
the most part vacant and generally flat. Much of the property is covered
with dumped fill. Beneath the fill soils are made up of a heterogeneous
(See attached sheet 1A.)
Description of surrounding properties, including information on: plants and animals;
historical, cultural, and scenic aspects; type and intensity of land use; and scale or
development. North: Existing Retail Commercial.
East: Existing Public Park containing a parking lot; baseball/soccer fields & lightin
West: Business Park/Industrial which is bounded by Alamo Creek.
South: Interstate 580. The development of this site will not endanger significant .
(See attached Sheet 1A.)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - Factual explanations of all answers except "no" are re- .
quired on attached sheets. Please see attached sheets entitled "Analysis of Qualified
No, Yes and' Unknown responses from the 'Environmental Assessment- Form." (See Sheet 2A.;
COMPONENT TNIPA= SCALE OF IMPACT
NO WALMI D YES UNII N Z
NO
of lolo
1.0 WATER
1.1 Hydrologic Balance Will construction of the project alter the hydro- X ( ( 1
logic balance?
1.2 Ground Water will the project affect the quality or quantity of X 1 1 1
ground water supplies?
La Depth to Water Toblo Will the rate of water withdrawal change the depth X 1 1 1
or gradient of the water table?
1.4 Drainage and Channel Form Will construction impede the natural drainage pattern 1
or cause alteration of stream channel form? X 1
1.5 Sedimentation Will construction in an area result in major sediment X
Influx into adjacent water bodies?
1.6 Flooding Will there be risk of loss of We or property due X
In,floodia ? 1 1
A-5 ,
cm)WENT ,.,jPACTS S4 OF IMPACT
NO QUALIFIED YES UM<NCWN
NO
� o
. a1 IIH
01� 1ca 10
1.7 Water Quality Does drinking water supply foil to meet state and X {
federal standards?
Will sewage be inojal-iotely occommcdoted and X ( {
treated?
Will receiving waters(nil to meat local, st-'c and X { { 1
federal standards?
Will ground water suffer contamination by vrrfuce
seepo}s, intrusion of salt or polluted voter from
adjacent water bodies or from another rrsn!.ir•inated X ( :
o rifer?
2.0 AIR ( {
2.1 Air Pollution Will there be generation and dispersion.of F'sllutonts
by project related activities or in proxir.it,te.t!-.e
project which will erreed sore n:r:ti-n o o.'r X
quality standards?
2.2 Wind Alteration Will structure and terrain-impede prescMrc wins ( {
flow causing channeling along certain.eorrid7-s pr X ( {
obstruction of wind movements?
3.0 EARTH
Are there potential dap n related to s! failures? X
3.1 Slope Stability P ge 'pe
3.2 Foundation Support Will there be risk to life or property.ic-o r:e of X
excessive deformation of materials?
3.3 Consolidation Will there be risk to life or property heca r:e cf X ( ( {
excessive consolidation of foundatior rantp•iols?
3.4 Subsidence Is there risk of major ground subside:nce nssni:icted X
with the project?
3.5 Seismic Activity Is there risk of damage or loss resulting frrm earth-
quote activity?
3.6 Liquefaction Will the project cause or be exposed to liqunfoction ( ( {
of soils in slcpes or under foundations? X
3.7 Erodibility Will there be s•:bstantiol loss of soil r!•:n!o crn- { { {
X
struction practices?
3.8 Permeability Will the permeability of soils associot-r!svi'!:the { {
project present adverse conditions relative tc de- X { {
velopment of wells?
3.9 Lhsigva Features Will any unique geological features bn damojed X
or destroyed by project activities?
3.10 Mineral Resources Are there geologic deposits of potentinl r.7n-:ercial X ( {
value close to the project?
4.0 PLANTS AND ANIMALS
4.1 Plant and Animal Species Are there rare or endangered species present? X
Are there species present wtiich are pa•ticulorly { { {
susceptiblc to impact from human activity? X
Is there vegetation pre-sent,, the!as;of wMI+will X
deny food or habitat to important wildlife species?
Are there nuisance species of plant or niimz!s for X ( ( {
which conditions will be improved by tFe project?
4.2 Vegetative Community Types Are there any unusual populations of pinnts that may X
be of scientific interest?
Are there vegetative community tyres arlsich are X
particularly susceptible to impact frr.n teumon ectivity?
Are th_rc major trees or major vegetntien that will X ( {
be elversely nffr-..tr.-1 by the proipct? _
Are there ve3:.1anve rnmmunity tyls^.s 0'e Ipss ( {
of which will deny frail or hoSito•to rri'.-11iin X ( ( {
species, or to o suSst•:ntiol num! o!r°'i'•rr.-`cn i�l;:' _ { {
4.3 Diversity Is there substan'iol d:versity in the n-t••-n: r•sr..-rrn:'y { { {
os reflected in the numbrr and ypr of ss!nnt�:nni;r-1 X
species present or the three.-dimensinrr.l orr^nq-rr.-n'
of plant species present? {
A-6
V
c�
4
IMPACTS
SCALE OF IMPACT
•,,. :". r NO QUALIFIID UNCNMN
oI101
5.0 FACILITIES AND SERVICES
5,1 Educotional Facilities Will projected enrollments adversely affect the ex- :• I.
(sting or proposed facilities in terms of spacing for
all activities, Including classrooms, recreational :
areas, and staffing needs? X
'r Will the project impact the pipit/teacher ratio so I I
as to impede the learning process? X
Is the school located such that it presents a hardship
for a portion of the enrollment in terms of travel time, X
distance,or safety hazards?
5.2 Commercial Facilities Will there be an Inadequate supply of and access to X
commercial facilities for the project? ( I
5.3 Liquid Waste Disposal Are provisions for sewage capacity inadequate for
the needs of the project without exceeding quality X
• standards?
Will the project be exposed to nuisances and odors X
associoted with wastewater treatment plants?
5.4 Solid Waste Disposal Is there Inadequate provision for disposal of solid X ( ( I
wastes generated by the project?
5.5 Water Supply Is there inadequate quantity or quality of water X ( I
supply to meet the needs of the project?
5.6 Storm Water Drainage Will storm water drainage be inadequate to prevent I I I
downstream flooding and to meet Federal State and X
• local standards?
5.7 Police Will tha project's additional population, facilities, I I I
or other features generate an increase in police service X
or create o police hazard?
t 5.8 Fire Will the project's additional population, focilities,
• or other features generate an increase in fire services X I I I
or create o fire hazard? I
5.9 Recreation Will the project have Inadequate Facilities to meet X
the recreational needs of the residents?
5.10 Cultural Facilities Will cultural facilities be unavailable to the project
residents? X
6.0 TRANSPORTATION I
6.1 Transportation Facilities Are the traffic demands on adjacent roads currently I
at or above capacity? If not, will the traffic gen-
erated by the project cause the adjacent roods to
reach or exceed capacity? X
4 Are the other transportation facilities which serve the I I I
•`} project Inadequate to accommodate the project's X
travel demands?
6.2 Circulation Conflicts Will desig•s of tha pruiect or conditions in the surround- X I I
ing area increase accidents due to circulation canflicts.
6.3 Rood Safety and Design Will project residents and users be exposed to increased
t accident risks dun to roadway and street design or lack X I I
of traffic controls?
7.0 HEALTH
7.1 Odors• Will the project be exposed to or generate any intense X
odors?
I 7.2 Crowding and Density Will the residents and users be exposed to crowding or X I I
high density in their physical living environment? '
7.3 Nuisances Will the project be exposed to or generate factors that X I
may be considered as nuisances? I I I
7.4 Structural Safety Will design and proposed construction techniques fail
• to meet state and local building codes? X
8.0 NOISE
I I I
8.1 Noise Levels Will the project be exposed to or generate adverse X noise levels?
8.2 Vibrations Will the project be exposed to vibrations nnnoying to
humans? X
I I ,
1 I I
A-7'.
OOMPCIT IMPACTS
SCALE OF IMPACT
NO QUALIFIED XE.S c.MQaa*l
NO
I Io
aI1a1H
011010 .
9,0 COMMUNITY CHARACTER
9,1 Community Organization . Will the project disrupt on existing"t of
orgonlznlions or groups within tine community?
9.2 Homogeneity and Diversity Will the project change the character of the
community in terns of distribution or concentration
• - of income, ethnic, housing,or age group?
9.3 Community Stability and Will the project be exposed to or generate on
Physical Conditions area of poor stability and phyLicol conditions? X
: 10.0 VISUAL QUALITY
10.1 Views Will residents of the surrounding area be adversely X
affected by views of or from the project? I I I
;.j Will the project residents be adversely affected by X
views of or from the surrounding area? •
10.2 Shadows Will the project be exposed to or generate excessive
: shadows? X
11.0 HISTORICAND CULTLF.UL
RESO5iCES
1 1 I •
11.1 Historic and Cultural Will Ike project involve the destruction or alter-
Resources ation of a historic resource? X
Will the project result in isolation of a historic X
resource from its surrounding environment?
Will the project introduce physical, visual, audible I 1
or otmo:pheric elements thnt ore not in character with X I I
a historic resource or its setting?
11.2 Archoeo!ogical Sites Will the project involve the destruction or alteration
and Structures of an archoeolo:.)icol resaurco? X
Will the project result in is--3lotion of an archaeological ( 1 1
resource? X
Wili the project introduce physical, visual,audible I 1
or atmospheric elements that ore not in character with
an archaeological resource or its setting? X ( 1
1
12.0 ENERGY
12.1 Energy Requirements Ara there potential problems with the supply of I 1
energy required for the project? X
Will the energy requirements exceed the capacity X I
of the service utility company? I 1
Will there be a net increase in energy used for the 1 1 1
project compared to the no project olternative? X
1r 12.2 Conservation Measures Does the project planning and design fail to include X 1 1
: ovoilob!c crier
` gy consarvntion m^a;urr.:. 1 I (
i 13.0 LAND USE I I 1
13,1 Site No:ords Do conditions of the site, proposed site development,
or surrounding area create paten.iolly hazardous situ- X
otions? I 1
13.2 Physical Threat. Wil! the project or the surrounding area create a feeling �' --
of insecurity and physical threat o none the residents X I'
and users?
13.3 Sanitary Landfill Wil! the project bn.xposed to structurni damage,
noise, air, or vsrface nrd gsound water pollutionI ( 1
,:r other nuisnncrs ossacioteJ with a sanitary landfill? X I ( 1
13.4 Waterways Wil! tlsz project affect on existing -tcrwoy through
filling, dredging, draining, culverting, w-mle dis-
charges, loss of visual quality or other land use X 1 I 1
-'-- practices? I
1 f t
I I 1
I 1
• 1 I I '
A-8
OOh LENT S� OF XMPP=-
NO QUALIFIED YES - UMKM
NO
: 1 1 to
11a1H
I° 101
• I• I 1
Other Environmental Componentr.
C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE QUALI
NO NO YES UNENKOWN
(�) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish cr wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant %
or animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods
or California history or prehistory?
(2) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage,of long-term, environmental
goals?
(3) Does the project have impacts which are individually .
limited but cumulateively considerable? (A project X
may impact on two or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is relatively small, b•ut
where the effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
(4) Does the project.have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human R .
beings, either directly or indirectly?
_. A-9 :.
D.. MITIGATION MEASURES- Discussion of the ways to mitiga`e'#e' significant effects
identified, if any: Please see attached sheets entitled "Mitigation Measure S.
(See sheet 3A.) .
E. DETERMINATION - On the basis of this initial evaluation: r
171 The City of Dublih finds that there will not be any*sign ificant effect. The par-
ticular characteristics of this project and the mitigation measures incorporated into
the design of the project provide �ha Factual basis for the finding. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IS i:=QU1RED.
M The City of VL bl in finds that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect . .
on the environment. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED**
Signature and date: � _ 8-I
Name and title: Larry Tong. Planning _D tor
**NOTE: Where a project is revised in response to an Initial Study so than poi ens jal adverse
effects are mitigated to a point where no significant environmental effects would occur, a
revised Initial Study will be prepared and a Negative Declaration will be requ*,red i is`ead of
an EIR.
Sheet IA
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, INTERIM .(continued)
Civic Center Development/City of Dublin
A. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING (continued)' (Description 'of project) - mixture of
moderately stiff to very stiff clays, silts, and some sands. The site
contains mature pines and liquid amber trees. The site fronts Dublin
Boulevard, Interstate 580, and Sierra Court.
(Description of surrounding properties) - plant and animal environments,
nor will it lead to the loss of valuable historical, cultural, or scenic
amenities.
Sheet 2A
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, INTERIM (continued)
Civic Center Development/City of Dublin
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - Analysis of "Qualified No, Yes and Unknown
Responses from the Environmental Assessment Form."
` 1.2 (Ground Water) : Development of this site will substantially
increase the amount of impervious surfaces
located on the property and will lead to the
introduction of urban pollutants (runoff
from parking areas carrying oil/gas etc.)
which collectively may impact quality of
groundwater.
1.6 (Flooding) : The subject site is located in Flood Zone B
according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map
for Dublin, published by the Federal Energy
Management Agency. Flood Zone B is
identified as an area subject to 100 to 500
year flooding with an average depth of less
than 1 foot. However, the Alamo Canal
(which runs directly through this site) is
rated in Flood Zone A which is identified as
an area subject to 100 year flooding with
indeterminate depths. There is very little
potential that periodic flooding could
present a risk to property and lives.
2.1 (Air Pollution) : A project of this magnitude will not have
significant air pollution impacts according
to standards set forth by the Bay Area Air
Quality Control Management District.
However, during the contruction/grading
process, there will be substantial amounts
of dust generated here.
2.2 (Wind Alteration) : This structure, once constructed, will alter
wind movements within the area.
3.2 (Foundation Support) : There is potential that the soils on this
site are of a questionable consistency and
thus could create structural foundation
support problems.
3.5 (Seismic Activity) : According to the State of California's
Special Earthquake Studies Zone Map, there
are no active faults within approximately
one mile of the site. As an essential
public building, a dynamic analysis will be
performed by the Structural Engineer.
-1-
... .::. ... .....,r.; +r:.,,.�,,:..:::.. ..v.;..•, :r.: ,.». .n:y,., �.... .., u- :^?54.. ,... .�..a. _.�:::.. .�.a:.c:i;Y...nl'w�.:.lld:_...s1.wuik:S::.s....u.-'�.i:r s�..zl,�.:_.:s. .3J..:,;:x.:.E
3.6 (Liquefaction) : On the basis of the strength and density of
the soils on this site, potential for
liquefaction is considered minimal so long
as the groundwater levels remain below 10
feet. This notation was made in the
Geologic and Seismic Hazards Study prepared
for Amador Joint Union High School District
in March of 1973.
4.2 (Vegetative
Community Types) : The site has some mature urban landscaping
which is not native. The trees were added
at the time that the school was developed on
the property.
6.1 (Transportation
Facilities) : The construction of a 52,000+ square foot
Civic Center will increase traffic demands
on adjacent roads.
7.1 (Odors) : The project is adjacent to an Alameda County
Flood Control and Water Conservation
District facility, which may emit odors. It
is the responsibility of the facility owner
to maintain the canal in a condition which
mitigates this impact.
8.1 (Noise Levels) : The project site is located where noise
levels range from 60 db to 75 db. At the
level of 70 - 75 db, the Dublin General Plan
specifies that this is conditionally accept-
able for office uses (which is the use the
Civic Center can be grouped under) as long
as noise insulation features are included
during the construction process.
The project includes a Police facility,
which requires testing of patrol vehicle
sirens prior to use of the vehicle. This
noise would be intermittent and for a short
duration.
11.1 (Historic &
Cultural Resources) : Through the construction process, artifacts
of historic or archaeological significance
could be found on this site.
-2-
GL''''ir�dl�7il'.�J�S9?�.jf'��: �%3e1:"eS$�a7}'-w4+ "o�'r9L`:43+"",.f+:W.:S+i:""(I�'.'.<a'.Y.t�.lcsrrr �ipt7�Cf3'iTlF5G5�64ffi f°..F'u!►."'dflRSG3&Yr+;��15 °''""`--r er rs.'s�w-•ry_•.0 iS.:Y,F�ks.$�.:..
r
11.2 (Archaeological
Sites & Structures) Please refer to 11.1 previous page.
12.1 (Energy
Requirements) :' Proposal of a new 52;000+ square foot Civic
Center on this primarily vacant site will
result in a net increase in energy use
compared to no project alternative.
-3-
.�;r,.t?.:[y`l'�+��rli�R�LF°;x'v'7vca:+i^.xbt.�:�€+..erxr.:'.y;se«t��ns.aul:tira�:cr.+wY:r�... e+:�.W:.•::rc+.:••'>;.;�xxnw�.ra��:szs.:....�.usx.N..�.;�s:.u:¢w!uenz�:�a:xseXeat.,sitX�:�..�it3z��n•�.s.. ;.:' "^e:3YSr'ss__-�;"�/u;Edti.,rA",rl;:ec.ww.Z]�:.r".:W:'
Sheet 3A
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, INTERIM (continued)
Civic Center Development/City of Dublin
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
1.2 (Ground Water) : The City of Dublin's City Engineer (in
combination with the Project Architect and
Engineer) will be responsible for making
certain that the development of this site
will be completed utilizing the most advance
ground surface materials available in order
to curtail the seepage of urban pollutants
into the ground water system. In addition,
the City Engineer will be responsible for
making certain that the drainage system for
this facility will be properly tied into the
existing City system as well as making
certain that the finished on-site grading is
carried out in a fashion that provides for
smooth and unobstructed flows into the
appropriate drainage systems. This work
shall be completed through the review of
construction plans during the plan check
process to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and prior to beginning
construction.
1.6 (Flooding) : The City of Dublin's City Engineer (in
combination with the Project Engineer and
Architect) will be responsible for .
1) making certain that the finished grade
for all building pads, structures, parking
areas and landscape areas on this site are
finished at a level that takes them
completely out of risk of flooding;
2) making certain that all building pads,
structures, and parking areas are
significantly separated from the center line
of Alamo Creek at a distance of at least 100
feet for all buildings and building pads) ;
and 3) site grading as well a building
placement and parking lot placement are
finished upslope from Alamo Creek. This
work shall be completed through the review
of construction plans during the plan check
process, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and prior to beginning
construction.
-1-
h
i
2.1 ( Air Pollution) : During the construction grading process, the
City Engineer shall be responsible for
making certain that the project site is
either watered down on a daily basis as many
times as he finds necessary, or other dust
palliative measures are to be used to his
satisfaction in order to prevent excessive
dust pollution.
2.2 (Wind Alteration) : Although wind movement will be altered, this
change will not be significant enough to
cause any adverse environmental impacts,
particularly since extremely heavy wind
flows in the area do not normally reach
dangerous velocities.
3.2 (Foundation Support) : Prior to beginning construction, a Soils
Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist must
submit to the City Building Official and
City Engineer a Soils Report. This Soils
Report shall clearly identify all problems
associated with the soils on this site. The
Report will make specific recommendations
dealing with but not limited to problems
associated with site preparation, grading,
compaction, liquefaction, surface drainage,
erosion control and structural foundation
support. The City Building Official and
City Engineer shall be responsible for
making certain that the content of the Soils
Report is acceptable and that all site
preparation work is completed in accordance
with this report.
3.5 (Seismic Activity) : Based upon the results of the "dynamic
analysis" report by the Structural Engineer,
and prior to the issuance of Building
Permits, the construction plans shall
reflect the appropriate construction
standards set forth in the report in order
to mitigate potential earthquake damage.
This work shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Building Official
with the assistance of the Structural
Engineer.
-2-
.-.M»:..+ry.r r ...M:«... ....a4. .m .r,...a..ru........e......_.............................w..w..............w..............-.. ............... .......-... ......,......................,........,....ra.....,rr.w.........wva.u.0w..swwuu.wa... ...:..r.-,. .-. ....
,
3.6 (Liquefaction) : The Soils Report mentioned in Mitigation
Measure 3.2 will set forth appropriate
mitigation measures in order to avoid
liquefaction. The City Building Official
and City Engineer will be responsible for
making certain that all necessary mitigation
measures are complied with and shown on
construction plans as well as during on-site
construction progress checks.
4.2 (Vegetative
Community Types) : Through the review of the design of this
facility, the Planning Director can make
certain that the Project Architect makes
reasonable attempts to save as many mature,
healthy trees as possible. In addition, the
Planning Director can make certain that the
approved landscape plans contain a substan-
tial amount of mature speciman trees in
order to mitigate the loss of any
significant trees.
6.1 (Transportation
Facilities) : In 1985 the City of Dublin Traffic Engineer
prepared a report analyzing traffic
conditions. This report was completed based
on a development plan submitted by the
previous property owner, Imperial Freeholds.
Their proposal included a 160,779 square
foot office complex on the same site as the
proposed Civc Center site. As a result of
this study, a signal was required for the
intersection of Dublin Boulevard at Sierra
Court. The traffic signal was ultimately
installed.
If studies completed in 1985 found that a
160,779 square foot office complex can be
constructed on this site and not have
significant traffic impacts as long as a
traffic signal is installed at the
intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra
Court, then a 52,000 square foot Civic
Center complex constructed in 1987/88 should
have an even less significant traffic
impact. A copy of the.Traffic Engineers
report is attached. :.
-3-
- -.... - --,..— �..•-. -..........-'-"....,_._._.,._._......-.,.N--r..,-.«.w.,. .«,....,,..:...v..o. .'.rsm�raaasouria'in.eee "CSssFL�E'LAt'�. 13!xFn.r '1tsr'ina:.7iA".�ia�di�t�n+aevrv�w.kscwa�,&✓a"'rii��thS" `
8.1 (Noise Levels) The majority of the building will be located
on portions of the site where noise levels
reach the 60 db reading. This is
acceptable. However,' in places on the site
' where noise levels exceed 61 db, and the
building is located there, construction
plans shall show special construction
r features to mitigate this impact. The City
Building Official shall be responsible for
making certain that these features are
y appropriately noted in the construction
plans prior to the issuance of Building
Permits.
a
With respect to police sirens, this testing
j will occur approximately 800 feet from the
3 nearest residential unit. The distance
should curtail any negative noise impacts.
i
11.1 (Historic &
Cultural Resources) : If, during construction, artifacts of
historic or archaeological significance are
found, construction in the vicinity shall be
halted, an archaeologist consulted, and the
City Planning Department notified. If in
the opinion of the archaeologist the remains
are significant, measures may be required by
.the Planning Director to protect them.
11.2 (Archaeological
Sites & Resources) : Please refer to 11.1 above.
12.1 (Energy
Requirements) : Proposal of a new 52,000+ square foot Civic
Center on a vacant site will result in a net
increase in energy use. However, its
construction will not adversely impact the
utility district's ability to provide
services here.
-4-
rp;; .. � rvu.wxwixrl] j r+tlS' 4+.i'`.t ^�'r;i1." mil_,% WV4
M
' 4637 Cbabot Drive,Suite 274
Pleasanton Ca. 94566 '
(415)463.0611
q MEMORANDr UM �...
rr; l . : j
DATE: January 2, - 1985
}f TO: Tam DeLuca, City of Dublin
Fes: Chris D. Kinzel, TJI4i
SUBJECT: Bedford and Imperial Traffic Study
:a
This memorandum is to present the firxiings of cur traffic
M, op:rnent on Sierra Court and the
Bedford Properties devel for the
serial- F'r'eeholds
project on the south side of Dublin Boulevard adjo
Ming the Lublin Sports
Grounds. . The purpose of the study - is to determine the appropriate
y distribution of costs for signalizing the PProPriatr
r., intersection of Dublin Boulevard
and Sierra court. estimated total signal installation cost is
$100,000. Two access alternates at the IRIDe- ]. Freeholds
ry were analyzed, one with a' driveway access onto Dublin Project site
location approximately 400 feet west of Sierra Cc�zrt B�levard at a
}, and the other with an
access road through the Dublin Sports G�tayds and joining
directly opposite Sierra Court. P.M. peak hour Dublin Boulevard _
volumes were used in detexmiraring projectionsiion apprrach
peak hour total approach volume at con
the intersection off Dube In
` Bculevard/Sierra Court is 2,189 vehicles per hour (vph) .
The Bedford project site would contain 192,648
square feet of gross floor
area, and, based on information provided by Susan Shipley of
was assumed that 30 percent of the project area would be Bedford, it
and the rest as warehouses. It is estimated that the Bedford used � offices
=1 generate 1,201 vehicle trips per daY and 240 vehicle trips
old
Peak hour,' and 144 of the 240 vehicle trips during the p.m-
-Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court. would use the intersecti� of
The Proposed Imperial office c=>plex'contains 160,779 Square feet of
floor area, which would generate approximately 11736 vehicle tri gross
and 347 vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour. With an access Y
opposing Sierra Court, all of the Imperial traffic would use the
intersection of Lublin Boulevard/Sierra Court, With an access of Sierra Court, only 320 of the 347 vehicle tripswoa � s
intersection, since left turns out of the site would be prop b,ted -
Therefore, if the signal �installat ion I .
cost were to be divided between
Bedford and Imperial based on
P.M. peak hour generation at Dublin
Boulevard/Sierra Court, . Bedford should contribute 29.3 percent
($29,300.00) , and Imperial 70.7 percent ($70 700.00 a
access opposing Sierra Court. If the ' ) Imperial
west of Sierra Court then Bedford Zr�erial aecess .were to be located
($31,000.00) , and Imperial 69.0 would need to contribute 31.0 percent
P?z'cerit ;($69,000.00) .
EXHIBIT .6 -
- r
Tam Deluca -2- January 2, 1985
A 170,000 square foot Bank of America building 'existed on the Bedford
Project site before being demolished -in August, -1984 Because of lack of
information, we were unable to determine the trip generation of that
building before the demolition. Since the available traffic volumes at
s Dublin Boulevard/Sierra-Ccurt were counted in AU 1Ct,- 1983, they probably
include some of the trips generated by the Bank of America building which
does not exist anymore. If the counts were cmxhicted now, it is likely
�. that the volumes on Sierra Court world ccune out lower than the 1983 counts.
However, this would not change the amount of the in=Mrz±al impacts of the
two study projects,
Other Dublin future developments that might Contrib.3te to the volume
increases at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court were
considered in the Dublin Boulevard Traffic Study conducted by TaM in
March, 1984. A list of these projects is resented in the attached
Their locations are shown in the attached figure.
table.
f g
A separate cost which should be borne by Iiperial Freeholds, is the cost
for widening Dublin Boulevard to allow U-turns at the inter-section of
Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court, if their site a=ess is to be located west
of Sierra Court. An eight-foot widening will be needed cn the north side
a of Dublin Boulevard west of Sierra court for appromdmately 200 feet.
i rhm
Attachments
cc: Iarry Tong
i
Lee Thaq=n
15717
V11 �• I t' .} ' t Fy ?
,r. r
{ s
T U, U5E r?,-9 F� UI�Ft FOIE I�:VEID NIS
MF ,parking
Description 1.000 scr.ft. Units Units Stalls
1 Ccm�rcial 65.0
2 Commercial 175.0
3 BART Station 1,250
4 Motel - 80
5 Multi-Family - - -221
6 .NUti-Family - - 53 _
7 Office 20.0
Lt. Trr2ustri al 20.0
8 Office 23.4
Lt. Industrial 12.6
9 Motel - .. 150
10 Office 40.0
Research 16.3
11 Lt. Mfg. 157.0
Office 17.0
12 Lt. Industrial 78.3
Office 8.7
13 Lt. Industrial 39.2
Office 4.4
14 Lt. Industrial 107.6
Office 57.9
15 Lt. Industrial 74.5 -
Office 8.3
16 Lt. dial 82.4
: Office 9.2 - _
�l , ..[ _..w a' •`::.r!::r.��i uH•T,wnu.MVr+Illae.ii:lK�r/AVIV37i&':dWfi4_/lYa✓iNd«irLflVlKLiauVrMFYi`rQ411@q+'1'TYi47,3f�+h3:e�F"14.[•l/:.{�/W�� ° /.�f�a�;q,�''y' ► y,�'�.�.+.,T�°,� 6� it'�`•'1•�'3'$Sa'td:::.We..`Y!'M
/�• � t '2 Qt � .''a _. i f r : > ...
v. �(���\;rJ•i� ��..t�� .� j a� 1 Jt r a �1 y� y, r i � r !� ,
.../a• . • b y t i�r✓•lw b�jeo• i .'yrpyy ( `- r � .
• �� gds �. ./�,r >� rr� •h�f�l ,/Y'{��iG`iw,� t+ - -.+ „1 ..n', t i'�`(i s.�c � _
� �d � r/t>r�,�7 �• ♦ i'•, pt,•^[,r•i� �+ r,rlr 'r3 t_
:.�^', \ 4r/'r,rr r/i rf Or J' •"S+�`wr� �Z y ` •
` n •ji .r � �' - rryr -� � /j .^r,�;y;.::r�i:r:��::.�.:.Lr•..::::.::::.:
7 T.' �. >, / � ���.:. ::. ;.r.r•s�:.iii:%i 1it.'•':%:: ........, -;�
\ •^ ,�rf y^� "'•• ss \ 'Vaa>P ,f,•� � � •isi.'.t:%77r,:..�.i;.•:: :::•:{:, .:r: �':i':::jait�:i'iii�?�
Y�( � Y I 9 �q, - ! .. ..1.::f;�,:JJJ:..J. ..j.:�'i:.':�::•:•:.i::'lr�;i::::.�:'ij::;;%ti•
SAN
RAMON •'l: �7. 7Yari :{? .t: �: :•*
i
•i1
a
f
NN
f /
1 ••r �•ti.�'. yy
1 '
r
z ? 1
4
J
•'1
.4
•J.•
1 r'
.r.
1 J
w
ry1•r
s
s �' :'•a•;?• a ��'! ?�•�.:>::�:rii:i•::�j;%Yi�:•:•�'rt•�•�... .i."•.�...•..
- \ s t ,tts;74>'r w ..•. '��MV,ea°d�d b r� � �a
.� s v o s ► 4::
�• t
3 i
r
J
r
:A
7 ,
M1
w' L
Z^
J
s• r
R'
J \
1 A
• f �� y � a. ao S•/.JPESERt'E FORCES 'r�:;�Vii:%.':•:�-:%:�:':':::
a r t• i
r:
c r
:4
_ o
t M
N.ITlON.riC% •!t:?. •� .:TRA/NI. .•IREI�.
GOLF
JV _
t
2 -
°q:t'
r
.. ys �,5,� �'i'..'• Vie:.. c+�,\ .\ - ::t0�1 a::!............ :
Zt
i -
1 -
/
a• �
i
i
.a
p� 1
1
i .
J
r`
e
4 a
6 - -
i
a•• +
1 -
I � —
. f
r
e
i
c �
c
r .rI
cd•s �.
r`
Y
w
1 -
ry
r[ rwl
t
.l
3i
.T
r.•M.. r
W •i
t
r,
_ t
•G
`•r
'!r
i •.F: i
d a
� a
r.
1 %
t�3
�• rt
r-
r •>_ N:
t a
-
fF _
�/� op a i. 4 >s t • ,u.u..r. :... ::::��ti:is':�«''�::•i,�: =�`,'._''.�:����'��..___
,ten - ►�... �`[��� •1� i-= � ",...•_- - 1::�_�:::;�'':; '�:�:���::�-.�:r:•:::.:•..;;:•:::::.,::_:::�:::.
IRASRESERt :;•.::
\ >$ '�= C=. " _ - - _ _ .F::`.':`;CORR£C710N.aL::::"=:•:'
'• i`vo ..i �r[I t it. r.... � ,rC .+- . a' I•:�_:.:� :r�:_"'::•�"._::i: i ?;:.::/.1777TL?E::%:;::;F:::�:::
is
f: :.
So•- a t;t.��r. ~ �s 'I:i- ' _.�t7~ .:.� a•^\ `` •t _ %:���::::.:=:::::::c:::^�.i�:i:���::�:•:•...•.:..;-. .
0
/I
+a -
•z
e
z
J
3
v
z 1 ••o
:t
••a
w�J -
b•\I�
d _
s •t -
1 -
:1
V
a
n
M♦ Z
1
S Z
••s
t
,
FORD
4 /
,t•
0
l
D -
U
B ,
u w. :.
Jam• .:..1 _. ' •.. :._._ �, Q_..`�.�—� IMPERIAL • �' IttASA.rI
Olt
�+• 0 w1 a , � I
s
rr \� \•Si\/+ `I Yom• i7
0. t ^pGt
Irt}.i, S Wit• r �.••i(_•. I '3
Al