Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
8.1 General Plan Amendment Study Request
. ... .......w,. Y.y, ..�.� 5.,..+•};;aSµ vJr.:! i .,:�. .W:.,�.:iirw«.. ,..,,,. }..,.,-.�:: ...,...,;.es.s..,.�.rs_S�f..c.c.:.16:axane..r:.r,.:t3;.z.ltad:..�_:>>..,.... ... ,r_. _ .... .. : 1 ► -20 AGENDA STATEMENT ;- CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 27, 1987 SUBJECT: PA 87-091 Gregory Group, Inc. - General Plan Amendment Study Request. EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Request for General Plan Amendment Study by Gregory Group, Inc. , April 7, 1987 2. General Plan Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Site Plan Detailing Existing Topography of Site 5. Copy of Tentative Map for Tract 4077 6. Conditions of Approval for Tract 4077 7. Copy of Declaration of Deed Restrictions Covering Lot #41 of Tract 4077 8. Copy of September 8, 1986, Petition from s Neighboring Property Owners Objecting to Development of Lot #41 of Tract 4077 9. Copy of Approved Building Footprint for Lot #16 of Tract 4930 10. Environmental Assessment Form, Interim 11. Attachment regarding Existing General Plan Policies RECOMMENDATION: (See below. ) FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Undetermined. Applicants pp ants to pay for Study and Consultant costs directly related to their proposal. DESCRIPTION: I. Background Gregory Group, Inc. , is requesting the Dublin City Council to authorize a General Plan Amendment Study to allow a review of a 10+ acre hillside property located in the western hills of the City. The site is identified as Lot #41 of Tract 4077, which lies west of the cul de sac terminus of both Padre Way and Via Zapata. The Applicants would like to gain City approval for residential development on the site in connection with an adjacent parcel which fronts along the south side of Bloomington Way (Lot #16 of Trct 4930) . Lot #41 is a remnant, undeveloped portion of Tract 4077. The General Plan Map and Land Use Element designate the following land use for the site: Open Space: Included are areas dedicated as open space on subdivision maps, slopes greater than 30 percent, stream protection corridors, woodlands and grazing lands. The adjacent parcel on Bloomington Way is designated for the following land use: Residential: Single family (0.9 to 6.0 units per gross residential acre) .. Detached and zero lot line (no side yard) units are within this density range. II. Zoning History and Previous Actions The subject property is the southern terminus of a northwest - southeast trending ridge which separates Koopman Creek to the northeast from Clark Creek to the southwest. Slopes vary from almost flat along the ridge line to as steep as 30%. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COPIES TO: Rich Angrisani c/o Gregory Group, Inc, ITEM N0, 94- L File PA 87-091 4 F r ea"' The bulk "of the .site was included within thKKe `lands zoned'to an A, Agricultural District in 1956 (96th' Zoning;unit) , ;;The overall acreage of Tract 4077 ,totaled,d25:2_++, acres. Portions ofsthatacreage,:wererespectivelq =A '1.rezoned in 1962 and 1978 to .a�R-1-B-E District ,'_; .7,,000,square foot minimum lot size (471st .Zoning Unit) and a R-1-B-E District".".,- :10;000 ;square foot minimum lot size (1364th Zoning Unit) ... ,The, area above?the:,520'„co ntour.elevation was retained, and remains, in the--A,,'Agricultural ',District-'designation. . This contour elevation had implications relating to,`ihe .water4ervice elevation ' cut-off. f' The Tentative Map application for Tract 4077 was filed in 1978 by the Woodland Development Corporation.,. " Gregory 'Group,•:'I'nc. , .subsequently. purchased the property and 'developed,.the 46 -lots ultimately approved for the project. -The project layout detailed on the''origirial'•Tentative Map submittal proposed the inclusion of an alignment 'of a future..roadway:which would have provided for the extension of Padre Way along the crest of. the -ridge. Through the project review process,• which included preparation and review of detailed soils and geotechnical studies and the preparation.of an'.Environmental Impact Report, the development plans were -modified several times. .' The project review process ultimately led to the elimination of.the..:proposed future roadway along the ridge line and a commitment by the Developer .to commit-to permanent open space the large remnant parcel comprising that portion of the top of the ridge within Tract 4077 (Lot #41) , The Conditions of Approval ultimately adopted for Tract 4077 by-the Alameda County Board of Supervisors on July 16, 1979, 'included the following condition pertaining to Lot 41:,- j ' Condition #39 'Lot #41, B1ock,B. shall-be•preserved as permanent open space, concurrent with the filing of the .Final Map. Prior to the Final Map, Subdivider shall •submit `for -approval by the Planning Director the instrument or means by which this will be accomplished. The required deed restriction covering Lot #41 was recorded by the Gregory Group on March 30, 1981 (see Attachment #7) . A review of the Planning Application files for Tract 4077 revealed that Lot #41, by virtue of its not being a "for sale housing unit", was not made subject to the CC & R's established for the remainder of the 46-lot Canyon Creek Subdivision. III. Issues The purpose of this hearing is to present the request for authorization of a General Plan Amendment Study before the City Council, and to have the Council determine whether or not to authorize the Study. The purpose of the Study would be to consider clarifying or changing land use policies covering the subject property. If the City Council decides to not authorize an Amendment Study, all of the existing policies will remain in effect. In essence, the remainder of 'the property would continue to be used as open space. As a result of the previous subdivision applicaton, the site has been committed to open space use, and the General Plan reflects an open space designation. The road network and site grading for Tract 4077 clearly reflected the agreement that Lot #41 would be retained as an open space parcel. Homeowners in Tract 4077 and the adjoining portions of the Estate Homes project have purchased their homes with the understanding that Lot #41 was designated as an Open Space property. Approval of the request for a General Plan Amendment Study covering this property may set a negative precedent for future requests to consider overturning commitments to'reserve areas for open space use. -2 • _ - - - .x.�. _r .. .•frt`. .. rai;`•i .Y..j.v. .t. __.eeL .. . IV. Recommendation Based,on ,the :above,..Staff; Report, .,Staff,recommends that the request for authorization of a General Plan Amendment Study be denied. Should the City Council decide, however, to authorize the Study, the City Council should provide conceptual direction regarding the scope of the Study. -3- . - , ' ; _ .- .v a'' .fir`,. .. , . l rcw!.. ar ,_�. ,. r•i; ., 'lr•,. ,r RECEIVED APR 8 1987 April 7, 1987 DUBLIN pLANNING CITY OF DUBLIN Planning Department Attn: Mr. Kevin Gailey P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568. RE: Tract 4077 Block B, Lot 41 Dear Kevin: The above referenced lot is presently designated open space on the City's General Plan. We feel that the current designation is not appropriate considering the construction that has occurred along the parcel 's boundary. We would like to have the General Plan designation changed to single family residential (0.9 to 6.0 units per acre). Please consider this letter a request to the City Council for authorization to perform a General Plan Amendment Study for this parcel . Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, FOR GRIEGO Y GROUP, INC. Rick A. Angrisa i RAA/smm Gregory Group, Inc. 220 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite C • Redwood City, CA 94065 • (415) 595-2100 ATTACHOM"E'm'T ..OW „ , cgs • • � S” �1LS' •1 `jF•!Q s i ♦�i ��� �♦�j�iiii ��t_s D h' a `►: �'�, '�r .���' � + _ m ■' rr ri isms ON or, � rk �* • �'t ,t q f �d t� 1f�`• ,• ♦♦ 1 ♦ ar s 4� , � ✓ ' 1m/ice i� .����1►��� •��,,`���� /� j s •• ,��� ���� ♦ ♦ ■rr•`�� / /� �j k� t:. 1 •,�s °a, t - ;� fit. A N OEM �1 t it u , X. t , l !'tip/,y ,J a./air+� i, i{y} a°+�1'#`d j� N[fS� ��T iiM1MI F � f/•e + +:1 � .Y -e / .s fxi• irjb ri' i• j•� ,ruff 4 ,W, x•! iy r , r �� f i T ,r t`>c r �:,� ".`/r+ {t r4��'+���h"��'•yt<`!-t r�ytls�f.,r�/y--.y.t�r !r'ti,r•f/� �ya 7 { j S r , r• I/4"3/:t1 f s fi 1 �ii4^_tAt t:tk/S c •t OX /f t Sl,, Y /1 (,.r. Y ' ! L rJ t?7 ♦ r �.ti� r � �+. r r �e::��� A e v�"GJ c4�� .. � ! r f F /f�+tq / I r 4 r x a? +•r+ ,}ilf,,,ay•j��'i'!o(�{�i A ' ah{ ti Y -. r e J f Y, ! '{n y f F �f H !y r7f f Vy ✓/ •-` / � ) � ': „w5 ! ✓fr <,- n� .c + � ri xr> �+ r f Js'", '3 r, �. r� , lyr��Z !1 f"e x� 14 rih��.tf.d� b f rr(Cr' f Ys. J4 ✓ 1r 5 3 .J < T ar- f r� r�,r f �+tif•yr•ry r! JJ '�S nfr ;t.Y, ny r�r rr+/r� a! . ,;:;:. -:,.;y.,•.,,..... '.., a. w, .,, .r•r +•x.:Yry `4�.fr l i / e ri �`(7 � r+ ySrr h fir. f i5 1'k�.. { � y r �Jy r`"/'+a t f t2./ f�f i t rt' �' 7 r rw �. :. •+— ,�>( � � ,+ •x I .i i + +•t/r _ fix, x- +rj+ � - )� ,i.: / t 1 Land Use and Circulation Section Residential Single-Family Residential (0.9fo6.0urnpwd ) Medium Density Residential (6.Ito 14 0„+na per wmj Medium-High Density Residential (fa f to 16.0 u."pw rnl Commercial/Industrial Retail/Office Retail/Office&Automotive j Business Park/Industrial Business Park/Industrial: Outdoor Storage Public/Semi-Public/Open Public/Semi-Public Facility Parks/Recreation Open Space;Stream Corridor Circulation ■o Arterial Street f Collector Street „,...,., BART • • • ••' Transportation Corridor • ` ♦ • �aa■�aaaaa` S1:L SIILL'i 3B ce Q / •.4�+ � 70,000 SA ,ow. I — G�U M1,U n - � \\`\\;\ 45c ll� �a r\. � R- D LL.J`T`f`—/ `. 2u r \``;;`` 1 _ r ' 6� 1 ,000QMBSA _ 4 20 fY \\\\\ l Q rerrs,Di .— e 4 b' DUelut SOIOOI \ \ \ •l• � i R-1-B-E I'A8 U .c not t, 80000 MUSA XILW , \\\\\\ Z PARK \ \ \ PA85-U. t 11 10 V O o~ J \ \ \ ASS cr CITY -ji 9.- ' •��'c. _E � 4 — _ - ie- a��.111 n U3. '�- - - .2r � .- �'\\`\\\ u 1 C.C. ort(. p .\// \ -I - ,_ R 1� / O t S 1J c. rt. I H.,� ,r c. .o, I, 1 -O �.. c C-1 :? rr Nu 11-115 Ae •Dj° "D "'�"" PA85-035 f i ;!�' l l _7l,rHL'.1:4 1 / �_O C,\7 •\.` ...,n•\ SHE r ` SEE. 51 ILET '113 _. \ i / /� Ste/ — // // // ///a•,/ // ys`+/ / / / / / / / �1' MCC Ile y/ p MW MOR ®R llir-all ==-"- � ��`���� �►�a♦: �� � � 1�� �:♦`'!tea-. �,+� ``�� ! ;ii i 7 Mmml - IN• ��.• � _ GQI VAP,�„� SRI ME ' On / �•� / �1,P , t you 4M," 5Z�=X.WW MEN �=hl ��J I N.0 v4 n 4140 J.- ............... EXHIBIT C U CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE MAP9 TRACT Jim , Jul y 16, 1979 . 1. The design and improvement of Tract 4077 shall be In 6nformance'with the design and improvements indicated graphically or by statement-on the face of the map labelled Exhibit B, Tract 40779 including street locations,: grades, alignments, and widths, the design of storm drainage.facilities Inside and outside the..Tract, grading,- of lots, the boundaries of the Tract, and County standards for roadways shown in typical sections. 2. The street surfacing shall be asphalt concrete paving. The Director of Public Works shall specify types of base materials to be used and shall .specify the structural design. The subdivider may, at his sole expense, make tests of the soil over which the surfacing and base is to be constructed and furnish the test reports to the Director of Public Works for use in:determining a preliminary structural design of the road bed. After rough grading has been completed, the Director of Public Works shall have tests performed to determine the final design of the road bed. 3. The minimum uniform gradient shall be 0.03 percent. 4. Where -easements are not obtained, -rights of entry shall be acquired by the subdivider in written form, originals of which are to be furnished the Director of Public Works from the adjoining property owners for' the -improvement -of drainageways outside of the Tract boundary. S. Prior to final preparation of the subgrade and placement of base materials, 'all underground utility mains shall be installed and service connections stubbed out beyond curb lines. Public utilities and sanitary.sewers shall be installed in-a manner which will not disturb the street pavement, curb and gutter, and sidewalks when future.service connections or extensions are made. .6., Precise plans and.specifications for street improvements, grading, drainage, and erosion control, street grades and drainage, including sizes and types of drainage structures, shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Wor 7. The ..subdivider. : shall . grade the tract, ..'install landscaping, ..sou ..,erosion, sedimentation, and -drainage control measures,i..and :improve all streets and easements, and shall contract with the County of Alameda to accomplish said improvements.:''Said contract shall be guaranteed by a faithful performance, labor and materials bond insuring to the County of Alameda in an amount equal to 100% and 50%1•respectively to cover estimated costs of-improvements.-,".Streets'covered by sai d contract shall have interim private street approval.until completion...' 8. The subdivider shall pay to the County of Alameda the actual costs of checking the plans, , specifications and easements,- inspections.i'of work and Investigations Incidental-thereto.-'..: : 9. - The subdivider shall Install street name signs and traffic safety signs in accordance.;.. with the standards of Alameda County.' sign an at d .10. Install street light standards and luminaires of the de the 'Iocatlons. '- approv ed by the Director of Public Works.::Apply,t 0' annex this subdivision Ao, An Se :Area,a, or..;to .establish 'a new:,County Service existing County,, rvice Area,,,t 1 e street lighting 0 h vice.---Apply LAFC.for.,this purpose prior•t submitting Jkv J, r V, the final map to the Directo of Public Works fo 7Y. 41 I,Mi X in H a M 4 e1 ft^ ref -�x -X MENT I#W r'0 /�•7v� .{f l/"1..i'•u,7 l r',,+'1:.r,r1 1••r 14ry 4:1 1��1,.r1)Y!.:i''.v a.fy,kf{4'�,./l l t�.�:'f.►•wl`:.l�i i":'%,,,t�wr et�!9 i'�/t'�+.,!C;'�`i I 6-rf/(/'�;.."./�lI.,'r.,.L��,r.,,�ryt�.Ui1!lJ•1„�)�f/•,•�/+T y flY•',�•''�qu'"�f•p p���,�SJG'Y�n{r��./(;�,.1.��/�M•y'}}{�`,1/^'%;,4/�.Y:/t'1�+r,:w r��I!���/'�'�-�r.�Yf/J,:l r':j/..L y/;'���%K,.��.✓f�(,L•,1 i,`r/.4 T+J�y J,•1�.,aP•�',q(!�:/�C''Ei.���J1'�y�v,P�ll�,�l/,,9'�l1'•�t�l.I 1.1�`,,+1�l'kk a!tt'a's;rcy4`h•.iJ a6�,i,�/''!,;i*r.�Y,.i r+7/{r/s';./.9��/:yyi,��l-F J,,i'-.",y"",'r1lJ,�13'/��a7a ld„•��r,l.i�{/h j�r��`;�,�•'i•,'i,I�;f/.,�;{[/r,y.y rh'.r!�/f;�l�/;y•/n��hy/.I,.0 y i w�I r�,{.�'..�,�+•Y��"r."+/.F�r'dO�/t/r y idr'':b'.i�►�/"1•ffi','d•{Y�t:tl, <r iri i;%/�.;�a/S./F'i�f r'•.,.�,4, • ..._ { f t n.. � .. r�l^rrll/ Y• f• �f�•'/n�:;Z l'' I� � V.' r � rr.'�'':.lr.�./a...��.M..1 ., ..�,.,.,.u..I.,L•..,•1i,wZ';/r:'.:iiiwl3� i#'i`l��it 1..�i�tf4;�ilN�1�'�`'r' .{.✓' J "1.�.':.W;:;rh'j+.'r74Yif::��,��. ;'. i i i� '1'l.'l%, y'/ '•/,'.dy... r .. .. .li ,� ,•r .•'W'•k►/ y '.td..r,/. 'tie,4•,rrr i.../.r�S.Yrr..n`v i....l'.,,. Conditions of Approval Tentative Map, Tract 4077 • Page Two 11. Electrical, gas, telephone and cable TV service shall be provided to each lot In the subdivision in accordance with Alameda County ordinances. 12. Curb-side postal delivery service shall be provided in accordance with postal department standards. 13. The subdivider shall furnish the Director of Public Works, before filing the Final Map, a letter from the Dublin San Ramon Services District stating that it has agreed to furnish water and sewer service respectively to all lots except Lot 41, Block B, included on the Final Map of the subdivision. 14. Install fire hydrants at locations approved by the DSRSD in accordance with standards of the District. 15. Any substantial deviation of the tract's design and improvements (including grading), from that required by the tentative map, shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. This condition shall include any changes proposed or required . during preparation of the Final Map and construction grading and improvement plans and any changes proposed or required as a result of conditions encountered during actual construction. - 16. Prior to filing the Final Map, a detailed soil and geologic investigation report conforming to provisions of the Alameda County Building Code shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works. 17. Grading of the tract must conform with recommendations of the report required in Condition 16 to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the bond referred to in Condition 7 shall so provide. 18. Prior to filing the Final Map and in any event prior to commencement of grading, subdivider shall submit a complete grading inspection and testing program for approval by the Director of Public Works. Said approved program shall be adhered to throughout construction of the project, shall provide for inspection by qualified personnel, as determined by the Director of Public Works, and shall include submittal of pertinent inspection reports to the Director of Public Works. 19. The following shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works, prior to acceptance of final improvements by the Board of Supervisors: a. An as-built grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer including " original ground surface elevations, as-graded ground surface elevations, lot drainage, and location of all surface and subsurface drainage facilities. b. A complete record including location and elevation of all field density tests, and a summary of all field and laboratory tests. C. A declaration by the Civil Engineer and Geologist that all work was done in accordance with the recommendations contained in the soil and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and specifications. d. Where soil or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations are different from that anticipated in the soil and geologic investigation report, or where such conditions warrant changes to the recommendations contained In the original soil investigation, a revised soil or geologic report shall be submitted for approval and shall be accompanied by an engineering and geologic opinion as to the safety of the site from hazards of.land slippage, erosion, settlement and seismic activity. e. The subdivider shall provide security in an amount and/or manner determined by the Director of Public Works as sufficient to quarantee the stability of cut and fill slopes for five years following completion of the tract. i4a•�cevw,t�ttd3?stAW�'Srt:.hti7i'14.'1L��>.tr.:zh'lu::iT°,.•t�trtl�+'S'_v'�`hlbAE\��"..9�LvL'�:37:`�:'tl'V��l:”�i4p?'l 1'A�':?'!��tYRi'irta�S�i'1'�SXRlt�'.QIt�SSN1i`VYY�'tih�'Lrl�'t1Af7il2V1tillesi�S.i�Ls;�.+a�th.^�'�ca•:�•,r-,a C•V •y. �JA 'yif�ri '.i 7 j r it / F �YF � r e'(jy.'fl/!M' jdt it i'.••., , ..�tir� l t�,y�r e3/j}+f3'?�JLj 'tt1f;d,r ,7 /J v: IF,r•>f.r.',.Ji'f rr i/...ir./. / ,n.,r.:•:./'. ..; ;' _ :.i.... ♦7' - "'bf 1XA,11�IT•"�Sl•Y r.• .W;rdx 7/T" frr{wu y.r..�..,....;. '17'i`A•v,,.....✓..i. /.w....v,.r......j .�...,t",. ,rw....,....r,...../, .(. •..'.-' i, •(/ {i.t / 'J), rr�' N ,, I/. / r•.�,4'�iii•.C(,6(�f�}•}•«.�Ky �/y'iu.� I' 1,;� ,r ...n;r,� Sy, rX.( 9fr. . :Z- •n' ';r1r7TfJ'ti�A'��'f.,.l yi dk�r,.r °�+..✓iU��4•,r,/•f, .!•':1'�"7�::':�5h r r . !' �i 1 R /A,.A/r {' ,., /,.''' .�" a h' t�' •,� r'J ) v, ,!r qS y:. , }( •Y i'%.1,./ If,�( •d. !'/•<�•,• . d`y'. .�•e'fte:, r,, �' `• .L:",7,d r,:��;1; '. `h' 1.Yr�'' .° .1 -* r,r �., �.,a, �. r.r.iJy, p ', ,f A�;,..!r;:.l:i, f'�(,;. �•Jf l Gti' �y;� � ^f•�✓:• .+I;;.,'.;.• �,' (�,r. M.•CY'::a! '. '• '}• '%r. -i�yt{ Qq:l1l'9�r,V_%r w• i il•t•v �f}� i �•. >?,'r.:pY,••�; .ar � N,'', •f'/ j( (( r. 6J7 ,y' .1•� 1•'f i::5:' 'Iw. .la;(r.. ;( •l�f 6. ''%�f{ .AaI�L!?:M ,:✓•:AJ;'^.� .,,../•.i.A! 'If :5'r A/rr/•....r.ri�r�'. 41;'•yA Gr:/4' .M"1y7 1•f/N•dYru',p . L:J:J„5” •.,�1,i1I'7.1.��'�w l: /'. 'b• :'Mr 1•i••�1/'�'°, '�•.'3'�•'�..,p. .,K.•w:� .t1.•/,.^y{�}t/I ,G.. J,:.:'1.;'yi'•�i'.'J".�' :(r.r �•�j i/ I'r.�"P(' /� 'i,��i.'J. 1,:"1.....,�..� 'J' „ //, /,;... , ( ,/ 1•.lr J�, 1•(; 1Jr) i7. r.,i• .•1;1 d,.,vr!•fr. '(�'�i., .:J i„/,U.. r'�.' ,r r��J,J•il A' .(1 Yr . �° 1. �:h:.li•4•:':j1;''•,/••�i� ��'•'r/'�. (:•:ra�•" •,.�,5 :/ J.'�f.{�:'.'r�'•r .;:,:.i;i;��!r.;/d fnl:.ryr 1�' J+, "•.Fk:'i',.r...i�l.rl:•..Jt vrlrt.'�h11 f �y'�. ..,... Y 'I ., % '.f'• �7�..{:1.�f d n.: Nil.4 J,b:.......1•."r. ! Y1.1:�I�.s,r./ rY';..:,.•a.••.r r: :r: .Gi).:..rJf�•.i.s1'f• :(:• i~Conditions of Approval �:'`~' •� • ' Tentative Map, Tract 4077 .. .• Page Three 20. Prior to any grading of the site, and in any case prior to filing a Final Map, a drainage, water quality, erosion and sedimentation control plan for construction and post-construction periods prepared by the Project Civil Engineer in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Soils Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist, shall be approved by the Director of Public Works. Said plan shall include detailed design, location, periods when required, and maintenance criteria of all erosion and sediment control measures. The plan shall attempt to insure that no increase in sediment or pollutants from the site will occur. The plan shall i provide for long-term maintenance of all permanent erosion and sediment control y measures such as slope vegetation. Sedimentation control measures shall be installed and functional prior to commencement of any grading operations on site. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be maintained by the developer for a period of 2 years following acceptance of improvements by the Board of Supervisors, 21. If grading is commenced prior to filing the Final Map, a surety or guarantee, as determined suitable by the Board of Supervisors, shall be filed with the County of Alameda to insure restoration of the site to a stable and erosion resistent state if the project is terminated prematurely. 22. Developer shall schedule contracting so that grading, installation of drainage facilities and erosion control planting will be completed and established prior to October 1 of any year of construction. No.grading shall occur between October 1 and April 15, unless authorized in wirting by the Director of Public Works. Under no circumstances shall grading commence prior to April 15, 1980. 23. Dust control measures, as approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be followed at all times during grading and construction operations. 24. Construction and grading operations shall be limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday) and the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 25. No cut or fill slope shall be constructed within three feet of the property line of the tract. 26. No cut or fill slope shall exceed 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope. 27. Cut and fill shall be balanced in the subdivision. No material shall be imported to or exported from the site. , 28. No fill shall be placed on the existing natural banks of Koopman Canyon or Clark Canyon Creeks. 29. No dwellings or structures shall be constructed within 20 feet of the existing natural creek top of bank or artificial top of bank created by the proposed grading. Prior to filing the Final Map, Subdivider shall record deed restrictions to accomplish-same. 30. The proposed storm drain that will discharge into Koopman Canyon Creek, behind Lot 40, shall have an outf all structure designed to control bank erosion at this point and also reduce the velocity of the flow in the creek. Flood Control District Standard SF-605 is recommended at this location. 31. In order to reduce the apparent height of their graded rear slopes, Lots 6, 7, 19, and 20, Block B, shall receive special design treatment through such measures as raising pads, utilization of front to back split-level pads, and/or selective use of retaining walls in addition to use of 2-story houses. Said treatment shall be approved by the Planning Director, prior to commencement of any grading for the tract. 32. Any water well, cathodic protection well, or exploratory boring that is shown on the map, is known to exist, Is proposed, or Is located during the course of field operations must be properly destroyed, backfilled, or maintained In accordance with applicable groundwater protection ordinances. �� f �.� r ,t r ri ��r. .� �/ � •f' /1 ry.'f•!. ' S e �'1�• r/+ •1'� f}� •t r A 73/>,it j,'h Conditions of Approval �•�: "";' Tentative Map, Tract 4077 , • j Page Four 33. Trash, construction debris, or materials shall not be allowed in the creek areas off site during any phase of the project. Subdivider shall clean up trash or construction debris, prior to acceptance of the project by the Board of Supervisors. 34. If during construction, archaeological remains are encountered, construction in the vicinity shall be halted, an archaeologist consulted and the County Planning Department notified. If in the opinion of the archaeologist the remains are significant, measures, as may be required by the Planning Director, shall be taken to protect them. 35. Street trees of at least 15 gallon size shall be planted outside the public right-of- way at the ratio of one tree per 40 feet of street frontage throughout the subdivision in accordance with a planting plan, including tree varieties, locations and staking details submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. 36. Prior to commencement of grading, subdivider shall submit for approval by the Planning Director a plan for protection of existing trees from construction activities. Subdivider shall implement all measures approved by the Planning Director. 37. Subdivider shall enter into an agreement with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company requiring that any home within the tract be constructed in accordance with PG&E's "Premium Energy Conservation Home Program". Said agreement shall be made binding on each and every lot in the tract. 38. Subdivider shall pay fees in lieu of park dedication to the DSRSD based on 22,780 square feet of land in the subdivision. 39. Lot 41, Block B shall be preserved as permanent open space, concurrent with the filing of the Final Map. Prior to filing the Final Map, subdivider shall submit for approval by the Planning Director, the instrument or means by which this will be accomplished. 40. Lots 1-7, Block A shall be developed with single story houses only. Prior to filing the Final Map, subdivider shall record deed restrictions to accomplish same. 41. Prior to filing the Final Map, subdivider shall record a maintenance agreement prohibiting homeowners from altering drainage patterns and systems without prior written approval by the Building Official and requiring homeowners to maintain interceptor ditches and drainage systems located on their owri property as shown on the as-built grading and drainage plan on file with the Public Works Agency. 3Y. IIIIII �T�„ 1 F r,l' e d- i to .,..:. t;. v' l: }1• r' ,' ,SIC. `•�, t 1;. ��)) 1 M 4 a \t ; ?:t';r'1`' \2 yy�yti�`9 �8 lc � 1 v )•, .\ } ' ,\..,t ` tt 1 r �at 5 ' i' .��:t:\ ��✓< 4�.r`) yL"�'3 ,7r{�r.^ v r ' �' 1�1"i�y rr� •1��.t.l� Sr� r lf.h i�`� t ,i 1, }t.•Tt y f P.42.•mot � Sy, �� �,\. 1 r y,1, .r \ 1 i. t�•� : F,' N. 'ii�• \'1 r 7 ., a \•',\ •w,n�' :1.;{ } �' • •`,�r ,f t).}, 11`�:,�t+t�� 11 l+'. '" j1 ,A Cyr�� lft�y 1 it l , u 'L ,�.>.. j v ♦ 4 i t) .:;! ,. '. Z ±qqr � � }, t' rrt �.ti ;tt i!fr 1, l (. 1, tt � t t ! ..S1V +11 / tr ,1 , 'S c,y l.a �:.t• k � i'\ r ,t� ;i aKi ,�, e. v4!.: `.a�:1?.\. F.. .\ r.+. 'Y�b:f;�``y!n:�l.`a..�, c'�}.; ...t .•tI'. ♦Ar,m....r+ '.} � �. .t1..,. ��?\.1•. r. ilWlt�ttOlS/.14�e ., i1fdEY,f1lM`GSf[' :y�#L�2N9F2S L1�1`L 1�L11 etilt.�fuA1!iPI1Kk1 wit! � - µwx �t�•.e:s:- ,.esa —TZ Lf h-7 rl This is that this is a true and correct / of..... ............................... - pECG� 7f.°_ recorded in the Upon Recording Return To: Office of 1he Recorder o0. y>�r County, Cal�f:rnia, as InS1rUr.'fOnt No. Gregory J. Erickson, President ��•ounty,altfcr n ( -Instrument N .. Gregory Group, Inc. . - .. }_ �n tf,e..10. �.,. 3000 Sand Hill Road day o��f.../! Pic....._........-----.....19. / Building 2, Suite 165 FIRST .N TITLE GIARA., COMPANY Menlo Park, CA 94025 By DECLARATION OF DEED RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION is made this 30 day of March , 1981, by DUBLIN HILLS ASSOCIATES, a California ge general partners, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant." RECITALS . A. Declarant is the owner of that certain tract of land (the "Tract") located in the Township of Pleasanton, County of Alameda, -State of California, delineated on that certain final map filed in the office of the Recorder of Alameda County, State of California, on the 20th day of June, 1980, in Book 118 of Maps at Pages 75 through 79 (the "Final Map") . B. Declarant intends by this document to subject Lot 41 ("Lot 4111) of Block "B" of the Tract as shown on the Final Map to the restrictions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that Lot 41 shall be held, sold, leased, encumbered, used, occupied, improved and conveyed subject to the restrictions contained in this Declaration, and that such restrictions shall run with Lot 41 and every part thereof, and . shall bind all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest therein, and shall inure to the benefit of each successor Li interest of the owners thereof. 1. Sloe Maintenance and Erosion Control. Within the area of Lot 41, no structure or other material shall be placed or 'permitted to remain or activities undertaken which may damage or interfere with established slope ratios, or create erosion, sliding, or sedimentation problems. In connection with the above slope maintenance restrictions, all trees, shrubs, and other landscaping on Lot 41 installed or planted by Declarant shall be maintained in good and healthy condition and shall be replaced as necessary. 2. Drainage Systems. Drainage systems installed or constructed on any portion of Lot 41 in accordance with the "as-built" improvement plan for the Tract filed or to be filed by Declarant with the Alameda County Public Works Agency (the "Plan") , shall not be altered in any way, whether by alteration of drainage patterns or otherwise, without: (a) the prior written approval of the Building Official of the Alameda County Building Inspection Department, and (b) during the five-year period immediately following acceptance by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors of final improvements described on the Plan, the prior written approval of Declarant. In addition, all interceptor ditches and drainage systems located on Lot 41 shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and good repair. 3. Right of Entry. During the five-year period immediately h following acceptance by the Board of Supervisors of; final improvements AITACHME"T COP f v I��G�aYtI oja-pee.-e Ov S7R1677, 0 S described on the Plan, Declarant or its authorized representative shall have the right but not the obligation during reasonable hours to enter upon and inspect Lot 41 and the improvements and landscaping thereon for the purpose of performing slope and landscaping maintenance as well as satisfying erosion and sedimentation control obligations created by the terms hereof, which Declarant in its reasonable judgment determines are not being properly performed or satisfied, and Declarant or said authorized representative shall not be deemed guilty of trespass by reason of such entry. Declarant shall have no right to perform such slope and landscaping maintenance or erosion and sedimentation obligations of any owner of Lot 41 until expiration of fifteen (15) days after Declarant delivers written notice to such owner of inadequate or improper performance of the same by such owner. This right of entry shall be personal to Declarant and shall in no event extend to any owners of Lot 41 other. than Declarant. 4. Payment for Declarant's Services. Each owner of Lot 41 who has not performe or who as improperly performed the obligations referred to above, and who has failed to cure the same within fifteen (1S) days after written notice thereof from' Declarant, shall pay a reasonable sum and/or reimburse Declarant for the value of Declarant's services rendered and/or for the amount of costs incurred by Declarant in performing such obligations for each said owner. Any sums not paid within said ten day period shall be delinquent and shall bear interest from the eleventh (11th) day after demand therefor at the rate of ten percent (100) per annum. The amount of any delinquent sums, including interest, shall be and become a lien upon Lot 41 upon Declarant's recordation with the County Recorder of Ala*reda County of a notice of delinquent payment (the "Notice of "Delinquency") , which notice shall state: (i) the amount of the sums in delinquency and the interest, if any, thereon, (ii) a description of Lot 41, and (iii) the name.. of the record owner thereof. Upon payment of the delinquent sums, or other satisfaction thereof, Declarant shall. cause the lien to be released. Said lien may be enforced by sale by Declarant, its attorney, or other person authorized to make the sale, after failure of said owner to pay delinquent sums, such sale to be conducted in accordance with the provisions of sections 2924 and 2924(a) through (h) of the California Civil Code, applicable to the exercise of powers of sale in mortgages and deeds of trust, or in any other manner permitted by law. No sale or transfer shall relieve Lot 41 from liability for any payment thereafter becoming delinquent or from the lien thereof. 5. Use. Lot 41 is hereby designated as open space and all residential use is prohibited, regardless of the zoning district . applicable to the property. In addition, all uses listed under Section 8-25.3 (Conditional Uses of the "A': , Agricultural, Zoning District) of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance are also prohibited. Lot 41 may be used only for the following uses, as set forth in Section 8-25.3 (Permitted Uses) of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance: a) Crop, vine or tree farm, truck garden, open air plant nursery, apiary, aviary, hatchery, horticulture. b) Raising and keeping of poultry, fowl, rabbits, sheep or goats or similar animals. c) Grazing, breeding or training of horses or cattle. d) Public or private riding or hiking trails. 6. Enforcement. The Restrictions set forth herein are created for the benefit of the ounty of Alameda, State of California, pursuant to a condition of said County's approval of a tentative map for the Tract shown on the Final Map, and are enforceable solely by the County of Alameda. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration on the day and year first above set forth. DECLARANT: Dublin Hills Associates, a California genera partnership BY: Lv�06�', STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) / ) SS. - COUNTY OF San Mateo ) • On this 30th day of March A.D. 1981 before me, Marl _ D. Cleveland a R-o—ta—r-y--Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Grecory J. Erickson known to me to be one of the partners of Ue partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this Certificate f4rst above writt n. �»:�:2::••�::2:�::� .__.:.__ _:�-:-:T -" --- Notary Public NO f T V S E,P 1986, UUBLiN PLANNING We the undersigned , own property adjacent to "lot 41" in Book 118 of maps ; on pages 75-79 , filed in the office of the Recorder of Alameda County , State of California . We understand the Gregory Group has purchased land from Estate Homes in order to build homes on the West end of lot 41. When our homes were built 5years ago we were told by the Gregory Group that lot41 was unsuitable for building on, and as can be seen in the enclosed photograph things have not changed . (note springs still running in the middle of the summer) . Now that eatate Homes have built along the North edge of Lot 41 we feel it is no longer suitable for some of the uses set forth in the enclosed covenant covering Lot 41 ie, raising and keeping poultry or fowl , the breeding or training of horses or cattle, or the use of riding and trails , any use that changes the waterShed or involes grading could have very serious consequences on our property which is below Lot 41 NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER c"7 /S06 Pa-AA-P- 7 a / e-1 1,11A .. / .� vo • �„��. l i Sad ��-�-- �J �� � � 7 L el5y G 97 Original :Dublin Planning Dept cc: Dublin City Council cc: Alameda County Records ] .. . cc: Gregory Group �� ��9- f �- ":t'iy' . �' Yi . fy' rr .y��,N ,{ y"ii�q.`•"k J.,+.r r i t t -a `'`',.�. ��zL' NG✓.:%.[Y�..� �, 5„ :.a. -TAT :1, t This is to y fthal this is a true and correct copy of......_.......................... `. 7 L.4 f- recorded In the Upon Recording Return To: Office of the Recorder ofl7..Gy Vt ; ,. "`q: Count , Califvwa, as Instrument No. J.?Erickson, President 8 5-32• .In ' ".. ;.` Gregory; Group,.:Inc. the._ -3000 Sand:.Hill'Road v --..._....._ _....-----.._.__._t9..._ FIRST A .N TITLE GUARAI COMPANY � � Building ,.,2, Suite 165 2 Menlo Park, CA 94025 By.. DECLARATION OF DEED RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION is made this 30 day of March 1981, by DUBLIN HILLS ASSOCIATES, a California general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant." RECITALS A. Declarant is the owner of that certain tract of land (the 'Tract'1) in the Township of Pleasanton, County of Alameda, -State of California, delineated on that certain final map filed in the office of the Recorder of Alameda County, State of California, on the 20th day of June, 1980, in Book 118 of Maps at Pages 75 through 79 (the "Final Map") . —B. Declarant intends by this document,to subject Lot 41 ("Lot 41") of Block "B" of the Tract as shovm on the Final Map to the restrictions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that Lot 41 shall be held, sold, leased, encumbered, used, occupied, improved and conveyed subject -co the restrictions contained in this Declaration, and that such restrictions shall run with Lot 41 and every part thereof, and shall bind all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest therein, and shall inure to the benefit of each successor in interest of the owners thereof. 1. . Sloe Maintenance and Erosion Control. Within the area of Lot 41, no structure or other material shall be placed or -permitted to remain or activities undertaken which may damage or interfere with established slope ratios, or create erosion, .sliding, or sedimentation problems. In connection with the above slope maintenance restrictions, / all trees, shrubs, and other landscaping on Lot 41 installed or planted by Declarant shall be maintained in good and healthy condition and shall be replaced as necessary. 2. Drainage Systems. Drainage systems installed or constructed on any portion of Lot 41 in accordance with the "as-built" improvement plan for the Tract filed or to be filed by Declarant with the Alameda County Public* Works Agency (the "Plan") , shall not be altered in any way, whether by alteration of drainage patterns or otherwise, without: (a) the prior written approval of the Building Official of the Alameda County Building Inspection Department, and (b) during the five-year period immediately following acceptance by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors of final improvements described on the Plan, the prior written approval of Declarant. In addition, all interceptor ditches and drainage systems located on Lot 41 shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary -condition and good repair. 3. Right of Entry. During the five-year period immediately a following acceptance by the Board of Supervisors of final improvements Dark areas (ringed) show springs still running in mid summer. Original Photograph at the Dublin Planning Dept. t ABINGDON CLASSICS ' The Color Monthly Magazine For MG Enthusiasts George H. Butler Publisher and President i; MG PUBLICATION,INC Res:8667 Bloomington Ct. R, P.O.Box 1635 Dublin,CA 94 568 Lafayette.CA 94549 (415)829.3456 MOMa� +G Y :6 described on the Plan, Declarant or its author' shall 'shall have .the right but not the obligation during reasonable-hours -= o:enter...'. upon and inspect Lot 41 and the improvements and_landscaping.thereon`•for-- the 'purpose of performing slope and landscaping maintenance`as-well as satisfying erosion and sedimentation control obligations .created by the terms hereof, which Declarant in its reasonable judgment.'determines-are.: not being properly performed or satisfied, and.;, Declarant ' or said authorized representative shall not be deemed .guilty -of trespass by reason of such entry. Declarant shall have- no `right--to perform such slope and landscaping maintenance or erosion = and. .tsedimentation obligations of any owner of Lot 41 until expiration ..'of fifteen: (15) days after Declarant delivers written notice to such owner-:of ,inadequate or improper performance of the same by such owner....,,Mls'`Tight '.of. entry shall be personal to Declarant and shall in no :;event extend to any owners of Lot 41 other- than Declarant 4. Payment for Declarant's Services. Each owner of Lot 41 who has not performe or who as improperly per performed the obligations referred to above, and who ..has failed to cure .the.same,within-;fifteen (15) days after written notice thereof from' Declarant, shall`•pay a reasonable sum and/or reimburse Declarant for the value .of � Declarant's : services. rendered and/or for the amount of costs 1 incurred - by,- Declarant . in performing such obligations for each said owner: ==:= Any.=sums not- paid within said ten day period shall be delinquent and shall bear interest from the eleventh (11th) day after demand therefore: -at the rate' of .ten percent (10%) per annum. The amount of any delinquent sums,- including interest, shall be and become a lien upon Lot 41 upon Declarant's recordation with the County Recorder of Alameda -County_'of a notice of delinquent payment (the "Notice of "Delinquency") , whih notice shall state: (i) the amount of the sums in delinquency and the interest, if any, thereon, (ii) a description of Lot 41, and (iii) the name of the record owner thereof. Upon payment of the delinquent sums, or other satisfaction thereof, Declarant shall- cause the lien to be released. Said lien may be enforced by sale by Declarant, its attorney, or other person authorized to make the sale, after failure of said owner to pay delinquent sums, such sale to be conducted in accordance with the provisions of sections 2924 and 2924(a) through (h) of the California Civil Code, applicable to the exercise of powers of ,sale in mortgages and deeds of trust, or in any other manner permitted by law. No sale or transfer shall relieve Lot 41 from liability for any payment thereafter becoming delinquent or from the lien thereof. S. Use. Lot 41 is hereby designated as open space and all residential use is prohibited, regardless of the zoning district . applicable to the property. In addition, all uses listed under Section 8-25.3 (Conditional Uses of the "A": , Agricultural, Zoning District) of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance are also prohibited. Lot 41 may be used only for the following uses, as set forth in Section 8-25.3 (Permitted Uses) of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance: a) Crop, vine or tree farm, truck garden, open air plant nursery, apiary, aviary, hatchery, horticulture. b) Raising and keeping of poultry, fowl, rabbits, sheep or goats or similar animals. c) Grazing, breeding or training of horses or cattle. d) Public or private riding or hiking trails. _ ___.�_�.............�.............-.+..�-.—e.....�.-.- .+.-...r.ev..vw�.n..rnvw+-uemsw[nmMV316iGY#)T.^,'!^^Ti1>'.•`.LR!'RiFL'.Ra'?'-3'. .,-.. .. ... -._ .-... ` -"-. �,t��wf vii�L�t5`.vfa-�.�`� xlu��•� � �A tiH7�w� .. �i�,1X..q,wr: f� ti'K'^'�° °��r�+�1�,f+,,,_s..�1f'vI.a Sr`: 6. Enforcement. The Restrictions set forth herein are created for the benefit of the County of Alameda, State of California;- pursuant to a condition of said County's approval of a tentative map . for the Tract shown on the Final Map, and are enforceable solely ,by the County of Alameda. .. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this,--Declaration on the day and year first above set forth. DECLARANT: Dublin Hills Associates, a California genera partnership • BY: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. : COUNTY OF San.Mateo ) On this 30th day of March A.D. 1981 before me, Marla D 1 vel and a otary blic in and for said County and State, personally appeared Greco J. Erickson , known to me to be one of the partners of the partners p at executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this Certificate Prst above writt n. Notary c -:-_..:7r..:..:_�--_ . . _ - ry l C 7Z- WIN 9: t +`'9:$`e�kr�F.��.`>ft ''' e.i�".�k�. 17G"s L• { i�179i.u� `t.�'`;h I!�.`. � � ri i s rrf Tt :;x y��,y-+j 'F t �.-� r n j t5 r'Y"`,s rJ:� �R r 'r t �� '£ A�- G m» - •. �:.(, +grir , �;�.:sl c, r- ;iM of N�, s�r�.��(' -i�r,�L,+ ��a«^i -r (✓. Y� r^.,�d�. x ff f/_.w.� °F7 i.� , Y ��7 ',u tt i •j,,,. ..fcs a r+ ,• r -..� f r. F ry+. -„�;a t q"a^ p � '_ .. ' � _cr' .a'f, }' t ��'w SF'•. t r ft 3r i_ x J} c -tF°r Y r -..t{ R•r"`7'i y. _ r S +� d � l> / Fr��f c 9�'`� � rt7 � r Jr jj4+ri4 } . � � '�':a•�.„ a -s •� � 3+ i'yva e {'�3>a�k p� nY sr+ s,fi.''Sr.y'`• a � � .$: �• 'R1fi...: �'� �1�.} �C �} t!� tiVj��DIY✓' t:�d S°��"ijLJ �t . _. ` t �r , r �;• r,\� `C i l S r .+a raj / itr r} ,a tiY�ay + 3 r '! �,(i�ta� / ., ♦ > � t t r r Sr mr J r � • � 't, r Y x r �\ .rte Ff r a ^� , S{ye � . t�;ii. �' * > f , � • � — /! }�i* { �♦ _�rl J a a r F, .�`�{ + t ° r - it+r�,f'�rq 8 L -r ; a ... '� �� y tF' ♦� rK pyf 3u,� '7j, ti y {!i.+✓ Y _..r� a�FY } { r r , I �� �\ Y?d r, �.:.� yr rat+F s 9 `fM!",� r 1� r�'r € a";`•F y - r I - I 0 �' \ r i v a \ r t or r c+r n j..a�x ,:P +' r•f� �ce 7 l �+{ \` - tr t r r a d � ♦ Y +yd } 31v-d� �' t Ax A,f�.���,� r ,�� � r '.',. , 1., •, `,\♦` yy r{4 t '•"..'f' �°>^s� y. �,,�\ �/i F ; %tf:-.. �`s tl3. .r. �r , ... �\� ` Q �',"1 a `f�" a t'r`s4,�♦ `.h ki .�� ,r x �•, � . � at � rf ( av +X � ♦ s � f} i yr ) 1 J a t 7i _�� v / p 42.5' f rry I 1 1 o { j 1 1 , 1 1 ; ' % L MIN pi�'a1i�.R1 I n'PAZTtABNT © b AS TO Z0MING t ®alai- "••. �.Sub;-eCt to rs 'cc:te.d • �giie �/ ,r V apt G 76.67 '' ,� ;SCr9�E•',, ., lbH u :t Y f •8 � } )z/}w a„•e x+� �••'✓'Sk �'. .n. 5s F '. �-,:� , _., Dd11,1 yS ;, ./.v�s.,: 1.•r�1 '��n ` CITY OF DVgLIN PA No. ` 70V i ENVIiRONMEIVTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, 114TERIM (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section.21000 et sec.) The State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines require the City to take an active role in preparing environ- mental documents. This comprehensive Environmental Assessment Form is designed to assist the City in preparing a complete and accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in conformance with the State CEQA Guidelines. The form has three sections : General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The applicant is requested to complete Section 1, General Data. The Planning Staff will prepare either Section 2, Exemption, or Section 3, Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink. SECTION 1. GENERAL. DATA - - - to be completed by the APPLICANT 1 . Name (if any) and address of project: .Lot 41 , Tract 4077 2. Proposed use of property: Single family residential . 3. Name, address, and telephone of Applicant: Gregory Group, Inc. 220C Twin Dolphin Drive, -Redwood City, CA 94065 415/595-2100 •4. Name, address, and telephone of contact person EM in addition to applicant or E instead of applicant: Rick Angrisani , Associated Consultants Group, Inc. 4850 Dublin Blvd Dublin, CA 94568 415/829-0230 5. Attached plans are II prel iminary or fully developed. 6. Building area: sq.ft. 7. Site area: ^ 11± ❑ sq.ft. or acres. S. Current zoning: O.S. 9. Maximum Building Height 2 E3 ft. or®stories. 10. Describe amount of daily traffic generated by number, type and time of day: typical residential traffic approkimately 10 trips per unit. 11 . Number of off-street parking spaces provided: 4 der unit 12. Number of loading facilities provided: 0 I& him ATTACHmENT � 0 A'97- o'9i 13. Proposed development schedule: beginning: - 11/87 completion: 11/88 14.a. If residential: number of new units 4 ; number of existing units L ;number of new bedrooms 16 ; unit sizes unk ;range of❑ sale prices or ❑rents link i type of dwelling Msi ngle family[] duplex[] multiple. 14.b. IF commercial: scope of project[] neighborhood, Q city, ❑ regional sales area C7 sq.ft. orb acre; estimated employment per shift ; hours of operation 14.c. If industrial: materials involved ; estimated employment per shift hours of 'Operation ' 14.d. If institutional: major function ; estimated employment per shift estimated occupancy ;.hours of operation 15. Describe City permits required:M Site Deve.loFMe4,t Q Advviiv►ista+ive. CoMi-tioW Q5e- f•ernnit; 0 ReclaSS ►Ca60A(Y2-ZDniV'O) ; C] Plav+v a pevdopme"r - 0 Cove iiiovW USe.ftrw'rt; Q Sigvti 0\(j; 91 O+ke.r GPA 16. Describe other public approvals required: ® unknown;CI loccl cgencies;[l regional agencies; state agencies; [] federal agencies; for CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify that tha information submitted is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that the findings of this Environmental Assessment apply only to the project as described above. Signature: Date: (Q A s Name (print or type): Rick A. Angri sani x S 1 j mV ii Existing General Plan Policies regarding`the' Gregory' Group, Inc Request for a General Plan 'Amendment Study . r, .r F The following' list'-contains -the existing'policies`:that could have an effect on the residential development proposal t 7 Residential Compatibility Require all site plans'to respect the privacy and scale of residential development nearby. Open Space: Natural'Resources, Public Health and Safety Maintain slopes.predominately over 30 percent' (disregarding minor surface humps _or hollows) as permanent open space for public health and safety. Continue requiring reservation of steep slopes, and ridges as open space as a condition of Subdivision Map approval. - Open Space: Agricultural ' Approval of development of agricultural land not under Williamson Act Agricultural Preserve Contract shall require findings that the land is suitable for the intended use and will have adequate urban services, and that conversion to urban usewill not have '.. significant adverse effects on adjoining lands remaining under contract. ' Open Spacer Outdoor Recreation, Appearance Restrict structures on the hillsides that appear to project above major ridgelines. Use subdivision design and site design review process to preserve or enhance the ridgelines that form the skyline as viewed from freeways or major arterial streets. Erosion/Siltation Control Maintain natural hydrologic system. Regulate grading and development on steep slopes. Review development proposals to insure site design that minimizes soil erosion and volume and velocity of surface runoff. Restrict development on slopes of over 30 percent. Geotechnical Analyses A preliminary geologic hazards report must be prepared for all subdivisions. Any other facility that could create a geologic hazard, such as a road or a building on hillside terrain, must also have such a study. Each of the hazards described in the Seismic Safety and Safety Element must be evaluated. This hazard analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineering geologist. iST/n/ •, ..,, :,,, f?'4' .. �;.• t ,�.},�.t, 4 r {�, y n. `+t � r .i� � t.{� !' 4�t;}n a�y�4a4�k��w.'�Cr _ rd W V uim •. �., .. ...., (+},y.. .'}�`f h�rf���t�kk+� gay, ri.— t` t A� -�'`'� i's. r'�'<f s. v j"�' 'Jtrw.? :,y+f�'t'� - ,.t s S � Fire Protection .r; Require.special precautions..against..fire as; a condition development approval in the western hills outside the primaryx;` , planning area „ r r a tk s� Enact a high hazard ordinance specifying- 4 Fire retardant roof materials, spark arrestors storage,-. and vegetation clearance around structures ���' Sprinklers for all habitable 'structures beyond'five .minutes response time from a".station r; r Flooding ,a Require drainage studies of entire small watersheds".' assurance that appropriate mitigation measures will,'be 'completed as needed prior to approval of development in the ex tended.planning`aarea. ==`_ . .. ,.. _. ....,„..� _..r. ..r Tk.�.�.r-5.: ... 4 �....� _�..F.'U"}, � �t;t�:ar..re,4.��.". ,E���.;�.t..;t•3,Y,w,e"�-.. -.. 10 ( O-L/o CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 27 , 1987 SUBJECT Report on TriValley Transporation Plan EXHIBITS ATTACHED Memorandum from TriValley Transportation Subcommittee & Attachment RECOMMENDATION Receive Report and Consider Recommendation of TriValley Council representatives . FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Undetermined at this time . DESCRIPTION On June 18 , 1987 , City Council representatives from the Cities of Danville , Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton , and San Ramon met at the Tri-Valley Council Meeting with the purpose of discussing transportation issues . The, representatives at that meeting were presented with the attached goals and objectives , which proposed the development and implementation of a TriValley Transportation Plan. Those representatives present agreed to discuss the proposed objectives with their individual City Councils and recommended that the TriValley Transportation Subcommittee meet during the summer to establish a scope of work to accomplish Action Item 1 . A. The work of the Subcommittee and action by individual City Councils will be presented at the next TriValley Council meeting which will be held in September in the City of Danville. ------------------------------------------------------ Q COPIES TO : ITEM NO. Item 8.2 Exhibit Missing Memorandum from Tri-Valley Transportation Subcommittee GOAL: DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Objective 1: Improve coordination, information sharing and cooperation among Tri-Valley jurisdictions. Objective 2: Coordinate local transportation capital improvements including location, scope and timing. Objective 3 : Improve coordination of efforts to increase the amount of Tri-Valley .'transportation .funding. . Objective l: Improve coordination, information sharing .and cooperation among Tri-Valley jurisdictions. Action JA: Share transportation information among Tr * i-Valle jurisdictions including General Plans, Capital y Improvement Programs, and current development activities. Action 1B: Meet quarterly as a full Committee, rotate hosting agencies, and develop subcommittees to address specific issues. Objective 2 : Coordinate local transportation capital improvements including location, scope and timing. Action 2A: Coordinate regional transportation improvements including: Freeways Park & Ride Lots Interchanges State Highways Inter-city Arterials Transit Service Action 2B: Coordinate local transportation planning including: Capital Improvement Program Local street interconnections Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Programs Level of Service (LOS) Standards 2 _ TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLAN June 12, 1987 :- Page Two Objective 3: Improve coordination of efforts to .increase amount of Tri-Valley transportation funding.the Action 3A: Support lobbying of funding agencies to .increase the Tri-Valley's share of transportation funding. Action 3B: Support the increased use of assessment dis as a funding mechanism. tricts Action 3C: Support the use of Joint Powers Authorities Tri-Valley jurisdictions as a funding mechanism. - 3 -